Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, November 16, 2007
Nicholas G. Hahn III :: Townhall.com Columnist
How Tehran Became Tiananmen
by Nicholas G. Hahn III
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


On June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square was red with blood. A destroyed paper-maiche monument to democracy lay in ruins. Over ten years later, students at Tehran University picked up the fallen Goddess of Democracy from Beijing and brought its spirit to Tehran. Spawned by the ever repressive Mullahs and the closure of the reformist newspaper Salam, students took to the streets and demanded an open society. The Basijs and police forces chased the students back to their dormitories. Students were taken, blindfolded, shot, and thrown off their dormitory balconies.

Amir Abbas Fakhravar founded the Confederation of Iranian Students and worked for regime change within the Islamic Republic. After exposing these atrocities at Tehran University in newspapers now banned in the Islamic Republic, Fakhravar spent over five years in jail and suffered brutal physical and emotional torture at the notorious Evin prison. His treatments have been described as the first known example of “white torture” by Amnesty International. He was placed in a completely soundless and colorless room. His clothes were white, his food, served on white plates, was also white. “After a while,” he told me, “you start to forget things, like what your mother’s face looked like.”

Fakhravar left prison to take a university exam, and never returned. Here he remembers watching President George W. Bush’s State of the Union address in 2002: “The day President Bush announced on television that Iran, North Korea, and Iraq were the ‘Axis of Evil,’ I hugged my father in front of the television. And we both cried. I told him this was the beginning of the end for the Islamic Republic. It gave us hope for the future.”

This story bears a striking resemblance to that of Natan Sharansky’s experience after reading President Ronald Reagan’s famous condemnation of the Soviet Union: “My Soviet jailers gave me the privilege of reading the latest copy of Pravda. Splashed across the front page was a condemnation of President Ronald Reagan for having the temerity to call the Soviet Union an ‘evil empire.’ Tapping on walls and talking through toilets, word of Reagan’s ‘provocation’ quickly spread throughout the prison. We dissidents were ecstatic. Finally, the leader of the free world had spoken the truth––a truth that burned inside the heart of each and every one of us.”

After seeing this blaring similarity, I realized that history would speak of Fakhravar synonymously with Sharansky, Tehran akin to Tiananmen. At my invitation to participate in a forum examining the threat of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Fakhravar spoke to the students of DePaul University in Chicago, Illinois. This student leader from Tehran would make his return to the university campus, and this time he wouldn’t be imprisoned for his speech.

When I greeted Fakhravar at the airport baggage claim, I thought, and evidently hoped, that he would one day be able to greet me with the same exuberance at an airport in Tehran. I later discovered he was thinking the same thing––hoping to welcome his friends from the United States to a new, free, and prosperous Tehran.

Upon his arrival to Chicago, Fakhravar was adamant about touring DePaul’s Student Center, the main student gathering on campus. As he walked through the building, I saw that the excitement in him was racing. The flurry of activity––open discussions amongst students and between faculty, student-manned information tables, the mass amount of student computers connected to the world at state-of-the-art internet speeds––this all seemed to fill Fakhravar’s heart with joy.

Suddenly, he stopped in front of a bulletin board used to advertise student events. He turned and looked at me different from ever before and pointing to the flyers on the board, he said, “This is our dream in Iran.” The diversity of ideas on display lit up his eyes with a hopeful vision of the future for his country.

In my introduction for Fakhravar, I stressed that despite our differences in language and ethnicity, we as students are one. The student generation is always the generation of liberty because it is the generation of prosperity, progress, innovation, knowledge, and dreams. Fakhravar captivated the audience with his personal stories and then surprised them with a seemingly unexpected denunciation of war. “I don’t want war. No one wants war,” he explained, “but it is the Islamic Republic who does.” After Fakhravar was through, he received a standing ovation––as the Natan Sharansky of our time rightly deserves.

As I watched him absorb the admiration of the audience, I was reminded of a time I, too, was captivated by Fakhravar’s story.

Over the summer, he invited me to his apartment in Washington, D.C. I wore a tee-shirt with an image of the Statue of Liberty painted on it. I remember the smirk that shot to his face when I pointed it out to him. He remembered that when he saw the Statue for the first time, he was stunned by its beauty. As a student in Tehran, he had only seen it depicted with a blood drenched skull for a face.

During a delightful Iranian meal, I remember a joke he told me, one that is enjoyed amongst the people of Iran. A Mullah was found drowning in a pool. One man went to save him and said, “Here, give me your hand.” The Mullah gave no response and continued to flail his arms. Again, this time with more urgency, the man said, “Give me your hand!” Still, no response. Another man who had been watching this, called out to the man trying to save the Mullah: “Don’t you know that’s a Mullah? Don’t say ‘Give me your hand,’ tell the Mullah to take your hand!” It reminded me of the jokes those behind the Iron Curtain used to tell each other, just to keep from going insane.

Before the evening was through, I asked to see his written “confession” from prison. He smiled and fetched it out of his room. In the meantime, I was told by his friends that he wrote it not as a confession, but as an attempt to convince his torturers of the power of freedom. Fakhravar remembered that when he told his captors he had written a poem, one of them prepared to hit him, but on second thought, sat down and permitted him to read it. As Fakhravar read the multiple paged poem, complete with doodles, I noticed that he had returned to that very day at Evin prison. At times, Fakhravar’s Persian was so engaging and fluid that it became too difficult for his friends to translate for me.

Almost on cue, Fakhravar broke from the Farsi and began to read in English. He told me that the leaders of freedom in Iran, perhaps a reference to himself, are like shooting stars in the sky. They are stars which “all the stars in the sky could gather around and follow.”

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
an inspiring sounding figure
One hopes that Fahkraver has the success of a Sharansky rather than that of the protesters at Tianiman square.

It is also good to see Hahn acknowledging that sensory deprivation is a form of torture. Too often conservatives have tried to limit what counts as torture so that we can do it too. We helped Sharansky by offering a vision of what a society could be, not by bombing the Russians or by declaring a need to reduce ourselves to the tactics of the Russians in order to protect ourselves.

Communists Never Lie
They never kill innocent civilians. All people in China are content, as are all people in Iran. The American government is the one who oppresses its citizens. Haven't you noticed all the political dissidents disappearing or missing limbs(actually, more than a few who got in the Clintahammuds way did). America has a long history of invading countries and setting up puppet governments, who are still oppressing the poor, miserable, enslaved, starving, fleeing their home at such a rate the government has to guard their border to keep too many from LEAVING. Sickening, a person or country should be judged by the results of it's actions, not by what anyone says about them. I gotta go throw up, I think I'll print out some of Boutte's comments to throw up on.

Boutte = Troll
'Nuff said.

Tehran`s Shining Freedom Stars
What a wonderful moving article. My heart aches for all the young students, their parents and all my fellow Iranians suffering under brutal mullah`s regime.
The present regime has totally destroyed the beauty of original Iranian culture.
Thanks again and please tell Mr.Fahkravar and all those who struggle for freedom, our prayers are with them.

Boutte is right
This article has all the earmarks of a typical neocon/neolib smear campaign, with the final goal being a bombing campaign against Iran (or, less likely, an outright invasion).

Do you want to see a change in Iran? Then open talks with them, open trade with them, and watch the people clamor for change. But if all you do is threaten them and bomb them, they will line up behind the leaders they have, preferring even the mullahs to a foreign occupying force.

Look--the same thing happened in the old Soviet Union, where the Russians (and others) decided to line up and fight for a ruthless, bloody dictator (Stalin), rather than surrender to a foreign invader (Hitler).

This is all so obvious, so straight-forward. But American leaders, both D's and R's, prefer threats and invasions to the cultural and intellectual challenges of diplomacy.

Liberals Do Not Grow Up
Growing up means facing and accepting responsibility. When has any liberal ever accepted responsibility for anything they, themselves, did? Being liberal means never having to say you are sorry. It is always someone else's fault, though they haven't a clue how to solve any problem, except to raise taxes..from someone else. Now where is that stack of Boutte comments I printed out? You never can find a lib when you need them. I gotta go throw up.

They arn't called D.U.I. fer nutt'n
Mr. Nobody writes: Friday, November, 16, 2007 2:25 PM
re: Tienanmen was a phony "Was this the Chinese goverments official story?"

Yes it is, word for word.

Paolo writes: Friday, November, 16, 2007 9:26 PM
"or, less likely, an outright invasion".

The United States Navy has completed hydrographic survey's of the entire coast of Iran. We are in the Stan's on every boarder. We have spies and sabatoures in Iran now, almost every day one is captured or executed. We have UDT in the waters of every major landing area on a regular basis. SEAL Teams are incontact with locals, read this from the Iran Daily:

The ministry said in a statement that its personnel also seized a cache of weapons from their hideout..“They were arrested after a tip-off from the public.....The aim of this separatist group was to create division".
The provincial capital Ahvaz was the scene of deadly attacks in October 2005 and January 2006, which Iran blamed on elements linked to Britain... the Intelligence Ministry said it had foiled a plan to carry out a “terrorist act“ in the oil-rich border province.
Iran accuses arch-foe the United States... of fomenting unrest in its sensitive border provinces......arrested six culprits involved...trigger sectarian violence by killing prominent religious figures of the province.
The terrorist group was not identified by the ministry."




lala writes:
lala writes:
"We have spies and sabatoures in Iran now, almost every day one is captured or executed...read this from the Iran Daily:"

What a laugh. Iran Daily also reported a few weeks ago that 14 spy squirrels were captured infiltrating the border.

Boutte and Paolo
Boutte writes "Indeed, today's China offers an increasingly attractive alternative to the USA, not least because China on its way to owning us."

Are you still here,at least live up to your ideals and move to the great socialist ideal.I will help you pack.And Paolo why dont you fly over to Iran.While you are there you can talk and hug a few people and explain how we are all good people who need to communicate and be more sensative to each other, before they hang you.I served because I believed in this country and its ideals.If you two feel somewhere else is better heres a ticket BYE TROLLS

An Apologist for Murder
Boutte sounds just like Walter Duranty reporting from Russia on how well things are going there in the early 1930's. Boutte is probably a Colonel with a red star on his shoulder.

To Paolo
I have no reason to believe you are gay, but just for safety's sake: if you are, don't follow wanna-be-lib's advice to visit Iran.

http://www.indymedia.ie/article/77340

And these are the folks we are supposed to play nice with? Talk about rewarding evil...


On Tiananmen
If the events that night *were* so badly misreported (and as the fact remains tacitly not acknowledged by our media pundits), then we really have to question the accuracy of, say, the media's reporting on the 'quagmire' in Iraq, don't we?

youth just ain't what it used to be
It seems to me the youth of Iran, especially those in college or recent grads, are much more "westernized" than the rest of the nation.

That's a far cry from the youthful college grads of 1979 Iran...those that seized our diplomats and helped to bring about Ayatollah Khomeini.

Iranian youth of today have had the "dubious pleasure" and perspective of having lived under the Islamic revolutionary system its youthful ancestors wrought 30 years previously.

And I don't think they are particularly fond of it. That SHOULD redound to our benefit.

I don't know the particulars on Tienanmen. I do know many here view the world thru rose-colored glasses, and it MAY be that Tienanmen was much more complicated than what a photo of a tank and student depicted.

Even as I am strongly opposed to this neocon adventurism that has infected this administration's foreign policy, I do think it is crucial that we do all we can(SHORT OF WAR)to support democracy movements around the world, but that does NOT include sanctimonious lectures to Putin and others whose support we need in fighting the Islamist threat(he has his own problems with Islamists in Chechnya)..the same Islamists whom Bush would probably view as "freedom fighters".

Persian inputs
Here is a snippet on Fakhravar from http://www.iranian.com: "On the last day of the hunger strike in New York with Akbar Ganji Sunday, someone pointed out Amir Abbas Fakhravar. I had read differing views on his effort to overthrow the Islamic Republic [see: "Hope" and "Keep looking"]. I decided to interview him and hear his own words." http://www.iranian.com/JahanshahJavid/2006/July/Fakhravar/ index.html

Go to the cited URL and click on "Hope" and "Keep looking" for both sides of the issue.

Lon
Your analysis is lost in abstractions. It serves as a rationalization for the UN and Clinton's failure to intervene in Rwanda and for the Behavior of England under the Chamberlin regime.

What one does is take into consideration the ideal and the practical. Your analogy to the Soviet Union does not take into consideration the practical problems; it was not feasible or prudent to go to war. When the USSR invaded Hungary and Czeck in clear violation of UN Charter(and neither of these countries had weapons of mass destruction nor a threat), the UN failed and showed it to be a phony.

So whether one goes to war is a matter of prudence; not some philosophical aversion to war. The odds were against us in our own Revolution and many people felt like you at that time and sided with the English as a matter of prudence or what they considered as a suicidal mission.

It was the "prudence" of the West including the Catholic Church in Europe that could have stopped Hitler in the early 30's. But people like you won out and only postponed the reckoning.


Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.