Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Nathan Tabor :: Townhall.com Columnist
Protecting the Unborn: A Step-By-Step Approach
by Nathan Tabor
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Saddleback taught us an important lesson: presumptive Republican nominee John McCain says he knows when life begins. Democratic Presidential heir apparent Barack Obama does not.

But Obama’s agnosticism on the question of the beginning of life is actually nothing knew. In 1973, in the era before 4-D ultrasounds made their way into the lives of ordinary American couples, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to specify when life began in the historic case known as Roe v. Wade. In fact, when read with its companion case, Doe v. Bolton, Roe allowed for abortion to take place during all nine-months of pregnancy. That’s why abortionists were able to get away with the heinous practice of partial-birth abortion.

Nevertheless, the High Court has allowed for certain restrictions on abortion: parental consent, 24-hour waiting periods, requirements that women be told of the risks of abortion and alternatives to it. The Freedom of Choice Act, which Obama has co-sponsored, would wipe out such restrictions, leading to an even more permissive policy where abortion is concerned.

I would like to make the case that if unborn life were strictly defined in the law, our courts would be required to protect, rather than devalue, unborn children. That’s why I recommend passing state laws which would categorize the unlawful killing of unborn babies as murder. After that, legal protection could be extended to unborn boys and girls whose lives are snuffed out in abortion facilities.

There is something of a legal precedent for this. A few years back, Congress passed and President George W. Bush signed into law the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, also known as Laci and Conner’s Law. Under this landmark legislation, anyone who attacks a pregnant mother and “intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child…shall be punished…for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.”

While this was an important step forward, this 2004 law applies only to federal cases or those who commit such a crime in the course of violating a federal law. Since most crimes are matters of state law, similar legislation needs to be passed at the state level. Fortunately, a number of states have already done this—the unlawful killing of unborn babies is classified as homicide in 36 states.

However, in other states, while injury to a pregnant woman may be a crime, the killing of unborn children is not considered a separate offense. The tragedy of such a schizophrenic policy has become painfully obvious in North Carolina. There, Lance Corporal Maria Lauterbach, a Marine stationed at Camp Lejeune, was viciously assaulted and killed while pregnant. Since there are no laws in North Carolina which equate the killing of a fetus to murder, authorities have brought no charges with regard to the death of Lauterbach’s unborn child. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Nathan Tabor organizes and educates Christians on their role in Politics.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Nathan Tabor's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
ken
So you don't believe in "freedom of conscience", then? ---

Of course I do. Freedom of conscience does not extend to others, however. That is why we have laws. I can swing my arm as much as I like, as long as you are not in the way.

Pregnancy is a technically challenging case. But it comes down to the fact that the mother is an individual whose body is being used by a dependent being that poses many risks and causes many physical changes to the body of the individual. It is therefore the individual’s choice whether she wants to agree to the associated risks.

What you have to do is demonstrate why a fetus would possess more rights than any normal person, especially when it is they are not formed, independent individuals with knowledge of self.

dreadnaught
---Give us a break. YOU deserve respect ??????? One who condones the murder of a defenseless baby? ---

Whatever, Osama. I don’t condone the murder of babies but the right of a person to control their own body.

---FREEDOM TO KILL ?---

It depends on your definitions of life and killing.


---A fetus is a human being.---

Only in the sense that it contains human genetic material, but so do those 40 million skin cells you shed everyday or those that are constantly reproducing in cultures for use as skin grafts.

My definition of a human requires more than genetic material. It requires little things like the ability to live as an independent being and self-consciousness.

---The fetus does NOT keep his mother from eating. Nor from defecating, or going to a market or a mall. All the fetus does is LIVE for a time, within the womb of a woman who CONCEIVED him!---

Ignorance truly is bliss, isn’t it? Read a book on the physiology of pregnancy and childbirth. While you are doing that, look up some facts about maternal mortality.

---Protecting LIFE isn't an "ideology," you simpleton!---

Simple is your worldview and definition of life. And yes, your opinion that you are protecting life is an ideology.

---YOU confuse LIFE of the innocent unborn with the wholesale death inflicted by jihadis, and that's clearly a non-starter---

Jihadists are about enforcing a religious lifestyle and so are you. Technically, it means enforcing god’s [allah in Arabic] law. There are both violent and non-violent forms of jihad. I hope you stick to the non-violent form.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.