Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, October 01, 2006
Nathan Tabor :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Real Bad Thing
by Nathan Tabor
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Perhaps you remember a time when Coca-Cola was considered the “Real Thing”…when a hot dog was termed a treat…and when illegal drugs were classified as dangerous narcotics that would eat away your brain and sap your emotional and even physical strength, often leaving a person destitute and, at times, dead. Drugs were considered a bad thing—a really bad thing.

But then the anti-drug campaigns of the ‘80s gave way to the drug-induced haze of the Clinton years and drug use among teens was no longer shocking. Some misguided parents even viewed it as a rite of passage, and movies and sitcoms began routinely celebrating a habit that can kill.

Now comes news that the manufacturers of a new soft drink have decided to dub their high-energy drink “Cocaine.”

Next, are we going to see brownie mix named “Marijuana Gold”?

The makers of this badly-titled beverage label the drink’s name as “a bit of fun,” according to a report in The Daily Mail. I’m sure that residents of rehab facilities around the world are chuckling about it, even as I compose this.

The manufacturer has the audacity to call the product a “legal alternative” to the better-known form of cocaine. I call the whole episode a particularly sad state of affairs in the business world. The inventor of the drink, an individual named Jamie Kirby, was quoted as saying, “As soon as people look at the can, they smile.”

I find it a little hard to believe that mothers who have lost their children to drug-impaired drivers would smile. Or fathers who’ve seen their sons shot down by neighborhood drug kingpins would find it funny. Or any of the wives and husbands of members of Narcotics Anonymous, who have seen cocaine rob their loved ones of their very souls, would think it harmless.

“Cocaine” boosters are simply try to make a fast buck and, in the process, may be tempting young people to test out “the real thing.” Can we really afford to allow another generation of young people to become sucked into the illegal drug culture? What about the lost productivity in offices, on construction sites, and in other business venues where employees have succumbed to the seduction of cocaine? What about the huge health care bills that can accompany physical and psychological treatment for drug addiction?

David Raynes of the UK National Drug Prevention Alliance had it right when he told the British press, “It is people exploiting drugs. It is a pretty cynical tactic exploiting illegal drugs for their own benefit.”

There was a time when you could walk into a restaurant and, if you were under the age of 12, the man behind the cash register would hand you a candy cigarette for free. Or you could stop by your local convenience store and enjoy a pretzel cigar. Or you could sit in a lounge with your parents and drink a kiddie cocktail or two. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Nathan Tabor organizes and educates Christians on their role in Politics.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Nathan Tabor's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Confused again?

First he or she says .....


jerubaal writes: Sunday, October, 01, 2006 7:49 PM
APR
"I knew you would say that; I was baiting you since you cannot connect the dots between a libertarian drug regime and good moral hygiene."

---------------

Then he or she adds ....

>>"Besides that,I wasn't connecting apartheid to drugs, but to your so-called good morals."


--------------

Read it again, chump --

1) I was mimicking conservatives with the "good morals" claim -- your clue should have been "'drug-crazed' America"

2) Check your dictionary. There was no "apartheid" in the era we mentioned, which I was kind enough to let pass.

Perhaps if you spent more time expanding your own issues -- instead of repeatedly failing to prove me wrong -- then you'd stop making such a fool of yourself in public.

ONE MORE TIME: "I'm looking forward to your evidence that this was all caused by drugs (the pre-1930s)."

"Connect the dots" for us, eh? :-)



Besides that,
I wasn't connecting apartheid to drugs, but to your so-called good morals.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.