A few weeks after
Citigroup (NYSE: C) said it would
rid itselfof one of its only consistently profitable
assets, it's shedding its highly lucrative Phibro commodities
trading unit.
No surprises here. Phibro houses commodities trader Andrew
Hall, whom Citi owes roughly $100 million in pay for 2009.
Being more than 30% owned by taxpayers and all, there's no
way Citi could pay Hall the GDP of a small nation. Remember
what happened when taxpayer-owned
AIG (NYSE: AIG) tried to pay a few hundred
mil to its derivatives traders? As Stephen Colbert put it:
"Our founding fathers knew that when the rights of the people
get trampled, we must become a torch-and-pitchfork-wielding
mob, empty of all thoughts; an injured, vengeful animal,
lashing out blindly at shapes and colors ... Let's go get
AIG!"
So Citi's avoiding a spanking from regulators by selling
Phibro to
Occidental Petroleum (NYSE: OXY). Nothing
wrong there.
What's odd is the price. Occidental is paying $250
million. Assuming it also has to pay Andrew Hall his entitled
$100 million, we'll say the real price was maybe $350
million.
Yet Phibro's average pre-tax earnings were $371 million
per year from 2003 to 2008. In other words, Citi sold the
unit for what looks like
maybeone times earnings. If you think that seems
like a pittance, you're right.
Granted, the past five years' earnings could have been an
anomaly. Given the volatility in commodity markets, they
probably were. But were they such an anomaly that Citigroup
thought the unit was only worth what it earned, on average,
over the past 12 months? That seems implausible, if not
ludicrous. These people are
bankers. If there's one thing they're good at, it's
selling absurd financial products at even more absurd prices
by trumpeting short-term results.
Bank analyst Dick Bove succinctly explained how he feels
about this oddity: "This decision has nothing to do with
creating value for shareholders and it has a lot to do with
the government's perception of how a bank should run, and
proprietary trading is not one of the things the government
wants banks to be doing."
Well, yeah. Commercial banks
shouldn'tbe doing proprietary trading. But they
shouldn't be liquidating their assets at insanely low prices,
either.
For related Foolishness:
Understanding Citigroup
Citigroup Wants Taxpayers Out of its Hair
What's Next for Citigroup?
This article was originally published as
Citigroup Hates Its Profitable Assets ... Againon
Fool.com
Copyright © 2009 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights
reserved.
|