Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Friday, June 14, 2002
Is the war on terror a war of ideas?
by
Mona Charen
0
Mona Charen's Email
|
Mona Charen
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?
Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know
Yes (56 %)
No (24 %)
Maybe/ Don't Know (20 %)
Questioned about his alliance with Soviet Russia against Nazi Germany, Churchill is reported to have said, "If Hitler invaded Hell, I'd find something nice to say about the Devil." At the start of our war on terror, for solid tactical reasons, we had to accept as an ally Pakistan -- an undemocratic nation that had previously distinguished itself as a promoter of terror. It was uncomfortable, but arguably necessary, because our larger objective of toppling the Taliban took precedence. Perhaps the infusion of American thank-you notes in the form of dollars will tilt Musharraf in our direction more permanently. It's difficult to say. But accommodations with unsavory allies are sometimes necessary in international relations. The odd thing about the war on terror is not that we have to shave our principles to succeed, but instead the degree to which our principles and our interests coincide. A cursory glance at the Middle East and South Asia -- the region from which the threat emanates -- reveals three kinds of societies. In the first group are nations whose governments are (at least outwardly) friendly toward the United States: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the small Gulf states fall into this group. In these countries, the people hate the United States because we are seen as propping up corrupt dictators. The second group consists of nations with governments hostile to the United States: Iran, (formerly) Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq, among others belong in this group. The United States is highly popular among the people of these countries, probably because they assume that if their awful governments hate us, we must be doing something right. Last, there are the countries in which the governments are friendly to us and the people are, as well. That is true of only two countries: Turkey and Israel, the sole democracies in the region. It would appear that promoting democracy, even among our "allies," is in our interests. But not everyone sees it that way. As Lawrence Kaplan points out in The New Republic, many in the State Department scorn democracy and dismiss its advocates as naifs. They argue: a) that Middle Eastern nations are not ready for it; or b) that dictators are better able to control the terrorists within their borders than democrats; or c) that the successor regimes are likely to be more anti-American than the ones we endure now. Regarding a), lots of nations have lived down their undemocratic pasts: Japan, Turkey, Germany, Chili, Nicaragua, the Philippines and Spain. All were dismissed as unready for democracy, and all have feely chosen it. The notion that dictators can be more ruthless with their terrorists and radicals is a snare. The Israelis naively assumed at the start of the Oslo process that Arafat would be better able to handle groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Instead, the Palestinians Arafat "handled" were the democrats -- nearly all of whom are dead, while the terrorists were given free reign. As for the nightmare scenario in which dictators are toppled only to be replaced with regimes that are even worse, there is one prominent example, Iran. But the counter-examples swamp it. In the name of "stability," the State Department opposed the break-up of the Soviet Union, believing that fascists would succeed communists. It didn't happen. In Central and South America, thanks to patient American pressure and inducements, all of the formerly dictatorial governments, right and left (save Cuba), have embraced -- to one degree or another -- democracy. Is it possible to imagine a Saudi regime more inimical to our interests than the current monarchy? Sure. But we should take their warnings with a grain of salt. In the first place, this regime is almost as bad for us as we can get, with its oil money spreading Wahhabism around the globe. Second, the sheiks are worried not just about radical Islamists unseating them, they are concerned about the radiating effects of freedom. If Iraq should be liberated, who knows what ideas may stir in Arabian hearts? The war on terror should be a war for democracy. Our interests and our principles dictate it.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Mona Charen is a syndicated columnist, political analyst and author of
Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Mona Charen's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
©Creators Syndicate
News Articles On This Topic
Grab the parkas, snow boots: Senate's in session
Senate Dems reach 60 vote threshold on health bill
Senate sends big Pentagon budget bill to Obama
Abortion opponents watching Nelson on health care
Suspected al-Qaida leader in Yemen escapes raid
Adm. Mullen tours Iraqi market
Feds: Arrests in Africa link al-Qaida and drugs
Possible Senate opponent to Reid worth millions
Republican Snowe still courted on health care
Pregnant soldiers could face court-martial
Popular Articles By
Charen
Holder's True Motive
Democrats Whistling Past Graveyard
How Low Can He Go?
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
HC Bill's "Concessions" on Abortion = Zero
posted at 12:04 PM
Nelson to vote "Yes" & Obama gets snowed.
posted at 11:00 AM
What Was Nelson's Price?
posted at 10:55 AM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The Headliners Hour 2
posted on:12/12/2009
Today's Columns
O'Reilly :
Partying with the Preside...
Driessen :
Life in a box
Eileen McGann :
How Obamacare Will H...
Kudlow :
Without Bipartisan Support,...
Cooper :
Reading This Column While D...
Harsanyi :
All the President's Menda...
Klukowski :
High Court Rejects Chall...
Kennedy :
Gifts Under The Tree: Ther...
Blackwell :
Power Player of the Week...
Gainor :
Class Warfare: Government v...
Fields :
When 'Spiritual Elevation' ...
Chavez :
Climate Hubris
North :
Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Tucker :
The Rising Tide of Red Ink
Buchanan :
Shakedown in Copenhagen
Goldberg :
Global Wealth Can Heal th...
Malkin :
Welcome to the Democratic P...
Krauthammer :
An Anniversary of Sort...
Limbaugh :
Radical Is as Radical App...
Charen :
Giving Thanks for Life
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
DINA CAPPIELLO : GOP: Obama can't act on climate without Congress
Today's Cartoons
Saturday, Dec. 19
Lisa Benson
Michael Ramirez
Eric Allie
Gary Varvel
More