Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Tuesday, December 05, 2000
The Supreme Court and American life
by
Mona Charen
0
Mona Charen's Email
|
Mona Charen
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?
Improvment
Detriment
We'll have to wait and see
Improvment (2 %)
Detriment (97 %)
We'll have to wait and see (2 %)
There is a sense in which the very fact that a presidential election contest had to be heard by the Supreme Court at all was bad for our democracy. It is not a healthy trend that we routinely relinquish control of our most important political questions to the branch that is supposed to be the least political. Residents of Florida, for example, have seen their efforts to enforce a death penalty for certain crimes repeatedly thwarted by a state Supreme Court that opposes it. Residents of Kansas City saw a federal judge take complete control of their town's school system, and the state of Nebraska recently learned that even legislating against a form of abortion that leading Democrats call "infanticide" is not tolerated by the U.S. Supreme Court. So for conservatives, watching this nightmare of litigation following the presidential election has elicited mixed feelings. In an ideal world, Al Gore's brazen attempt to call every incompletely punched ballot a clear vote for him would have been laughed off long ago without resort to a single robed eminence. (Perhaps the new slogan for the Democrats should be: "Others Merely Count Votes, We Read Minds.") But not only did the courts fail to stay out of Florida's electoral swamp -- the state Supreme Court made things much, much worse. The Florida court's decision ratified every contemptible step Gore had taken up to that point. Here was Gore attempting to change the rules after the game was over, attempting to use the courts to flout the clear intent of the law -- and the state Supreme Court said: "Gosh, it doesn't seem fair that the law permits only seven days for recounts. Let's give them a few more." That is when antagonists of judicial activism prayed for the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene -- not to make new laws that would benefit George W. Bush, but merely to state the principle that what the Florida court did was a travesty. National Review Kate O'Bierne was prescient when she wrote "uh-oh" the day the Florida Supreme Court held oral argument. The justices scarcely touched the matter of whether Katherine Harris had abused her authority in deciding not to accept ballots after Nov. 14 -- and that was the legal question at issue! So it was really not a big surprise when that activist (one might even say lawless) court delivered a decision that, by their lights, "did justice," but strayed far from the law. The U.S. Supreme Court is currently divided between justices who can find fancy language for doing what they want, and those who hew to the law. As such, they are representative of the nation, about half of which believes in rules and process, and about half of which believes only in winning by whatever means necessary. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg kept asking counsel why this court should not give extreme deference to the opinion of the Florida courts on matters of Florida law, stating again and again that this is the Supreme Court's practice. But as she surely knows, and as Justice Antonin Scalia and Bush attorney Ted Olson made clear, this is not a case in which a state Supreme Court was merely interpreting state law. Instead, the Florida court was using the Florida constitution to attempt to thwart the U.S. Constitution, and in Scalia's words, "That's the problem." The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and it grants power to state
legislatures
to appoint electors as they see fit. Some clever liberals like Mario Cuomo twist this language and insist that Florida's legislature did make the rules and intended that the Florida courts would interpret them as circumstances warrant. But that leaves you with the argument that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor could not swallow -- namely that changing a date from Nov. 14 to Nov. 27 is simply implementing the will of the legislature. If the framers had meant that state institutions taken as a whole would decide electors, they would have said so. The "living document" crowd may find that clause ambiguous. But the segment of the country that continues to believe in law can cheer today because the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the word "legislature" means legislature.
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Mona Charen is a syndicated columnist, political analyst and author of
Do-Gooders: How Liberals Hurt Those They Claim to Help
.
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Mona Charen's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
©Creators Syndicate
News Articles On This Topic
Obama calls small bankers meeting
Senate gears for second critical health vote
White House picks new cyber coordinator
Concessions lawmakers won in the health bill
Obama has powerful tool to pressure Myanmar
Gov't imposes 3-hour limit on tarmac strandings
Caring for Washington's warriors away from home
Abortion deal may be hard to keep in health bill
AP source: Giuliani supports Lazio for NY governor
Despite recession, crime keeps falling
Popular Articles By
Charen
Holder's True Motive
Democrats Whistling Past Graveyard
How Low Can He Go?
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
It's All About Connections
posted at 10:20 PM
Rudy Rules Out 2010 Run
posted at 09:03 PM
Other Hand-Picked Perks in the Senate Health Care Monstrosity
posted at 08:26 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The First Team Hour 2
posted on:12/19/2009
Today's Columns
Williams :
Black Education
Charen :
Maximum Achievable Damage
Feulner :
A Hand Up, Not a Hand Out
Prager :
Democrats Ensure America Wi...
Lukas :
Failing Public Schools Cost ...
Saunders :
A Cool Wind Braces the Ho...
Norris :
Away With the Manger
Adams :
Apology to a Sociology Stude...
Benson :
The Department of Injustice
Blackwell :
Senator J. Wellington Wi...
Thomas :
Snow Jobs
Sowell :
The "Science" Mantra
Limbaugh :
Obamacare Hazardous to Am...
MacKinnon :
A Warning and a Ray of H...
Schlafly :
Cut the Power of the Fami...
Hagelin :
One Solitary Life
Buchanan :
America's Party
Murchison :
Silent Night, Sordid Nig...
Barber :
The War on Christmas: It's ...
Hillman :
A Strategy for Freedom
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
MARGERY A. BECK : Neb.'s Nelson sees backlash on health reform plan
MARK WILLIAMS : Gas could be the cavalry in global warming fight
PETE YOST : Obama plan could limit records hidden from public
Today's Cartoons
Tuesday, Dec. 22
Eric Allie
Lisa Benson
Michael Ramirez
Gary Varvel
More