Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, February 23, 2007
Mike Gallagher :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama vs. Hillary
by Mike Gallagher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Like gaping motorists driving slowly past a car accident, it’s been a little disturbing to see so much blood in the waters that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are swimming in during their race to the Democratic presidential nomination.

Let’s see if we can sum up what transpired over just a few days: David Geffen, a Hollywood movie mogul and political leftie who used to be in the “Billary” circle of friends and money-raisers, has abandoned the Clintons and is now on the Barack bandwagon. It’s not entirely clear why the feisty little movie guy turned on the Clintons – evidently, there were some presidential pardons he had expected from President Clinton for some buddies of his that never materialized.

A number of Hollywood types are on record as saying that not only does one not want to be David Geffen’s friend, you sure don’t want to become his enemy. He is said to be one of those creepy, power-crazed billionaires who doesn’t like not getting his way.

Not only did he slam the Clintons by embracing the Illinois senator, but at a fundraiser for Obama recently, he poured gasoline on the fire by saying, “Everybody in politics lies (but the Clintons) do it with such ease it’s troubling.” He went on to tell Maureen Dowd of the New York Times that Bill Clinton is still having trouble keeping his pants zipped up around flirty women and that Hillary’s candidacy is a train wreck.

It doesn’t take a political policy wonk to imagine what kind of shrieking and gnashing of teeth took place in the Hillary-for-President camp. It’s highly unlikely that Madame Hillary smiled politely and said something like, “Oh, that darn David Geffen, he’s such a rascal” when she heard his slams. No, a more likely scenario involved plenty of obscenities being hurled and a few lamps hitting some walls.

There are a few undeniable truths in life: fish swim, birds fly, and a Clinton goes right for the jugular. The irony of the rap against David Geffen, that he is a much-despised, vindictive person, is that in the political world that also describes Hillary Clinton.

So it didn’t take long for her to come out swinging.

She dispatched Howard Wolfson, the longtime Clinton spin master, to demand that Sen. Obama denounce Geffen and – get this – fire him from the campaign and give back the money that was raised at the Obama fundraiser. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Mike Gallagher is a nationally syndicated radio host, Fox News Channel contributor and guest host and author of Surrounded by Idiots: Fighting Liberal Lunacy in America.

Be the first to read Mike Gallagher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Trouble over the horizon
That's right nothing but trouble, we have Edwards who is a left wing nut who won't get anywhere, Hillary who will make as bad of a president as her pervert husband and Obama who is way too inexperienced, wants to cut and run from Iraq and not fight the war on terror on any front or by any means.

Obama is nothing but talk, he is making this campaign all about race, as he claimed in a interview not too long ago, because I'm black I can't get a cab or his wife's stupid comment about because he's black he has more of a chance of being shot at a gas station, not to mention the fact that he seems to think he speaks for all African-Americans when not one of his ancestors were slaves, remember his father immigrated from Africa and his mother is white.

The Democratic nomination can go eithier way, Hillary might get it or Obama might but whoever does these two names will be on the ticket, Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton.

For the Republicans the only one we have is Guiliani who has two things going for him, one, he will be tough on terror and protect us and win in Iraq and two, he will secure the border. I know that a lot of conservitives dislike Guiliani because of his stance on abortion and gay marriage, but I don't have a problem with gay unions and if it turns into marriage then so be it, I disagree with all out gay marrige but we have bigger things to worry about at the moment, at least unions will give them benifets of married couples and will shut them up for a while, and I don't think Guiliani will push abortion because he realizes that if he does it will be the end of him. And unlike the rest of the Republican canidates Guiliani answers questions.

Mc Cain is too old and is pro ammenisy for all illegal aliens and pro open borders, Romney is a good guy and does deserve a shot at the whitehouse but won't get it simply because he is a Mormon which should be the least of our worries when it comes to electing a president.

Again it will be Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton and Guilinai will get the nomination from the GOP and beats Hillary by 500 votes, and vs Obama he could possibly beat him by more than 500 or less, if that turns out to be the case then it mightturn out being like the 2000 election, and with the liberals in there now God only knows what will happen, but no matter what does happen with these choices only trouble lies beyond the hill and over the horizon for this great country.

Socialism and the rich
Socialism is not about redistribution the wealth; that is a lie that socialists have told for many years in order to gain supporters. Socialism is really about CONCENTRATING the wealth into the hands of a very few. Evidence of this was in the former Soviet Union where party leaders lived in luxury while the "unwashed masses" had to be content with a "simple" lifestyle. And who can forget Romania's Micolae Ceaucescu whose luxuries included gold fixtures in the palace bathrooms? No wonder there are rich folk supporting socialism.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.