Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Two Letters of Recommendation
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


From: Mike Adams
Sent: Thu 2/26/09 4:37 PM
To: Shannon K. Jones

Good afternoon, Shannon. I received your request for a letter of recommendation to UNC School of Law. I also received your resume, your transcripts, and your LSAT results. Based upon what I read I have written you two letters of recommendation. The first letter is for North Carolina Central School of Law, which I believe would be a better choice given that your grades and test scores are good but less than stellar. The full text of the letter follows:

To Whom It May Concern:

As a professor at UNC-Wilmington, I have had the pleasure of knowing Shannon Jones for the last four years. She has been a good student and an asset to our program. I would like to take this opportunity to recommend Shannon to N.C. Central School of Law.

I feel confident that Shannon will continue to do well in her studies. She is a dedicated student and thus far her grades have been strong. She has a 3.1 overall GPA. In class, she has proven to be a leader who is able to successfully develop ideas and presentations and to implement them.

Shannon has also assisted us in our main office. She has successfully demonstrated leadership ability by speaking with prospective students. Her advice has been a great help to students, some of whom have taken time to share their comments with me. Many noted her pleasant and encouraging attitude.

It is for these reasons that I offer recommendations for Shannon without reservation. Her drive and abilities will truly be an asset to your law school. If you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Mike Adams
Associate Professor
UNC-Wilmington

As you can see, I wrote this letter without any reference to your status as a black female. Instead, I relied on your legitimate qualifications as a potential law student. But I also wrote a second letter based upon the sliding scale that is used for minorities (especially double minorities) in the law school admissions process. The full text of the second letter follows:

To Whom It May Concern:

As a professor at UNC-Wilmington, I have had the pleasure of knowing Shannon Jones for the last four years. She has been a good student and an asset to our program. I would like to take this opportunity to offer a minority recommendation for Shannon’s consideration by the admissions committee at UNC School of Law.

I feel confident that Shannon would do better in her studies were she to attend another law school. However, I am confident that Shannon will be given special consideration at UNC School of Law. Even if she lands near the bottom of the class, she will be guaranteed a good summer job by the progressives working in the placement office. She is a dedicated student and thus far her grades have been strong - although they are about half a grade point below the average expected of white male applicants. Her LSAT score of 156 is also well below that expected of white males. But her status as a black female should more than make up the difference.

Shannon has also assisted us in our main office. She has successfully demonstrated leadership ability by speaking with prospective students. Her advice has been a great help to students, some of whom have taken time to share their comments with me. Many noted her pleasant and encouraging attitude. This will undoubtedly help her to console other struggling minority students many of whom suffer greatly from the double standard operating at the law school.

It is for these reasons that I offer recommendations for Shannon without any reservations aside from the fact that she is not actually qualified, which I understand to be irrelevant in this case. Her demographic characteristics will truly be an asset to your law school’s mission as you have defined it. If you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Mike Adams Associate Professor UNC-Wilmington

As you may have guessed, Shannon, I only intend to send one of these letters of recommendation. The one you choose will reveal whether you wish to be judged by the content of your character or the color of your skin. It will also say a lot about your character.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
What fork in the road?
The choice astride the horns of a dilemna.

Shannon?

Will would sue. Something about his transgendered status, and no bathroom for him/her at the law school.

Hmm
Why hasn't shanon just asked "The justice Brothers" to just go protest the school she want's to go to? Isn't that the way it's always done these day's??

It's really sad that MLK isn't alive to see what buffons like Sharpton and Jackson et al. Have done to HIS comunity and HIS race.

Some of them learn but most are still mired in the same old dogma of self pity and victimhood.


Douglas will be here shortly
His posts will contain the words:

Dishonest
Conservatives
Leading
Psychologist
Victimization terms, at least three.

He will invoke victim status, use the 1964 civil rights act, fail to address Dr. Adams by his proper title, offer a psychological assessment of conservatives. cite studies without a link, and evidence without reference.

Anyone care to take a wager to see if it comes to pass?

It is sad
That in 2009, we are not past this type of nonsense and that it still merits discussion.

It is because of academics like Dr. Doug that this can never be put to rest. After all, solving a problem is never as enticing as keeping the issue alive to kick around like a football.

The RU 486 (morning after pill) should render the entire abortion debate moot but the left would never be able to raise as much money and scare the crap out of women about how evil "conservatives" want to eliminate their "right to choose" murder without keeping it alive artificially. I am saddened to see our nation unable to get past this because of political expedience.

The worst part is the blatant dishonesty of the left when you compare public policies when you blindly change the complexion of the oppressed or promoted.

this is true
it also reminds me that we forget to look at their character, after all, look who is our president. Would Obama have been chosen if he was white? I doubt it. Michelle Hart said the rest of what I was going to say.

We are all so tired of this S H eye T
We put up with it for twenty years lately and it just keeps going on. If you want to be treated like everyone else act like everyone else. Marry the mothers of your children and stay out of jail as it cost too much to keep you in there. We can't do anything about it however because we are all cowards.

LettersToPotus.com

Eric
"it also reminds me that we forget to look at their character, after all, look who is our president. Would Obama have been chosen if he was white? I doubt it. Michelle Hart said the rest of what I was going to say."

He is white. Half white.

this is strange
will shannon make as much as a white male student coming out of law school?

not according to every study done on the subject.

more importantly, adams certainly could have written the second recomendation without the snide and racist remarks.

adams makes the assumption of reverse racism while being racist himself by assuming that another law school would accept her simply because she is black.

tell the truth and let the chips fall where they may but the fact that he brought race into it is his issue not hers.

Anderson859
What does Dr. D and NASCAR have in common?
Circular repetition. Nice post prediction by the way.

What is the purpose of this?

Adams presents two letters that are radically different in details, but seems to think that the minority status component is what distinguishes them.

I don't understand the point he is trying to make. I suppose he is insinuating that minority recommendations are "bad" and that people who accept them are "bad".

But it would be impossible for any intelligent person to come to such a conclusion based on the two letters. This is just illogical garbage.

So I guess his purpose is to give his commenters something to whine about and more hostility to feed upon.

Enjoy.


Dr. Douglas
Look what a little projection will do to modify your behavior.

Nice to see you read my posts before posting your ususal inane thoughts.

But, you do not disappoint! I called it ! Refused to address Dr. Adams by his title, avoided the words you ususally use, and substituted others to make your same points.

See, you can be trained, just like Pavlovs dog. Dr. Adams posts, you come slobbering and drooling in your state of indignant jealousy, and then once again, lose intellectually to the better man.

Hey, if you apologize to Dr. Adams, maybe he will let you touch one of his guns someday.



Doc DUHg
"What is he purpose of this?" Why ask us such an inane question?

I hope I would read and article, study it and think a bit before posting. Then maybe ask for assitance.

Your unceasing hostility to authors and posters here disqualifys (sp) you from any help from this site.

Dr Doug - you said it.
"I don't understand the point he is trying to make. I suppose he is insinuating that minority recommendations are "bad" and that people who accept them are "bad".

But it would be impossible for any intelligent person to come to such a conclusion based on the two letters. This is just illogical garbage."

An intelligent person wouldn't come to such a conclusion; however, someone with very little intelligence could - as you did. Illogical garbage as opposed to what? logical garbage?

Christianlib (oxymoron) reverse racism

How is Dr Adams' second letter either racist or reverse racist? As no time does he discriminate on the basis of race as far as I can read - so please explain which phrase is racist.

And what on earth do you mean by reverse racism - that Dr Adams is being racist against whites the way that modern Democrats anti white Jim Crow legislation is? Or are you trying to pretend that discimination on the basis of race against white people isn't equally wrong and immoral as racism against other ethnic groups and so requires a different name?

It sickens me that liberals still can't judge people on the content of their character and remain childishly fixated with judging people by the colour of their skin and the contents of their underwear.


To All Dr. Adams Fans
I do not understand why you indulge posters like Dr. Doug. You know that he wants you to respond. Everyday its the same thing. He posts - gets a rise out of nearly everyone of you - he gets attention and nothing ever changes. If he wants to post, fine let him, but don't waste your time responding. You have better things to do.

Dr Doogie
Why dont you stop writing since you never seem to get the point of anything. Here's the point dr doobie, quotas, affirmitive action and other instances of preferential treatment of "minorities" are racist. They all suggest that minorities can not achieve things on theor own but rather need help or special deference in orderto be successful. Sad very sad.

christian lib and a
You realize these are not real lettes right? You relaize he is making another point right? You relaize you have both forgotten to take your meds right?

Dr. Douglas
Your post was dishonest, bigoted, and, most importantly, non-refereed.

James
You are right! We give too much time and credit to Dr doogie. He is a small minded being who clings to things, like his degrees and peer reviewed journals which he thinks makes him better then all those around him. He suffers from a man crush on dr adams that consumes his every thought. Dr adams is all he can think about. I bet he makes everyone around him call him "doctor" and when he gives his name at a restaurant wait list for a table, i bet he uses "docotr". Wanna bet?

Character?
Professor Adams must not realize that this post speaks volumes about the content of his character.

Texas Bulldog
He treats this issue with the amount of character it deserves.

Dr. Adams...

Dr. Adams,

I simply love the way you use satire to draw out the 'nutters' from under the sink and the baseboards.

Sadly that particular genera will be here long after the real humans have faded into history.

Several people on here actually realize that there is no actual individual named "Shannon."

You use this to illustrate the double standard that Dems use to ensure the new enslavement of a group of people, to ensure a Dem voting base.

They have destroyed a large portion of the very fine American Blacks, many of whom fought for their rights, and won them...

Great men and women...

Douglas, DuBois, Sowell, Walter Williams, The Tuskegee Airmen, and hundreds of thousands of others not so well known...

Sadly I cannot remember the name of the Black lady who started her own cosmetics industry many years ago.

War heros, as the cook at Pearl Harbor, Hundreds of others, The Rainbow Division in WW I, Blacks heros in Viet Nam, such as Powell.

I know, personally, or by reputation in our own community, many who are fine workers, or managers, or owners of their own busineses, a few Lawyers ( Don't hold that against them :) ), One fine Judge !
And, a couple of College Professors.


Blacks, if left to their own devices can compete with the best !

When they are forced into ghettos, and subsidised, they are placed at a disadvantage that is far worse than the original slavery, some of their ancestors were subjected to.


Since I know from simple observation of factual evidence, there can be NO successful refutation of any of my comments, I rest my case.


Nepotism also ?


Mary
Location: OR
Reply # 13
Date: Feb 27, 2009 - 6:46 AM EST Dr Doug - you said it.
"I don't understand the point he is trying to make. I suppose he is insinuating that minority recommendations are "bad" and that people who accept them are "bad".

But it would be impossible for any intelligent person to come to such a conclusion based on the two letters. This is just illogical garbage."

An intelligent person wouldn't come to such a conclusion; however, someone with very little intelligence could - as you did. Illogical garbage as opposed to what? logical garbage?

~~~


Well. Could it be that mr dugh has recruited a staff member from OR, or Relative, to add assistance to his ignorant, predictable, ration of hate that 'it' [sic] liberally applies to various TH columns?

I do suspect so.



Monty Python...
I'll bet Dr Doug didn't get that either. Satire is great stuff. I remember as a kid first thing after checking the box scores, turning to the op ed pages to see if there was an article by Art Buchwald. Didn't always agree with him, but I loved his satire. In some of the great classic literature, satire was used with devastating effect. Unfortunately, if you aren't familiar with the history and the times, it doesn't always come across as well in modern times. That is one of the great pities of the destruction of classical liberal education.

Flag every post of Dr Doogie as
offensive and then move on by. His posts are offensive to anyone using their brain. Don't waste time reading or, especially, responding to the nimrod.

Treat the other trolls to the same treatment. It works great for me and I don't have to yell at the computer when I read their screed.

Two Letters
Do you think it is possible that Dr. Adams is sick and tired of the "Affirmative Action" BS and the "I'm a victim of racism" BS that goes on forever? Will there ever be a day when the situation improves to the point where those who support this BS for personal gain stop complaining? I don't think so! Therefore I have decided that I want to come back as a beautiful black woman in my next life!

FeedFwd...

FeedFwd
Location: TX
Reply # 24
Date: Feb 27, 2009 - 9:36 AM EST Monty Python...
I'll bet Dr Doug didn't get that either. Satire is great stuff. I remember as a kid first thing after checking the box scores, turning to the op ed pages to see if there was an article by Art Buchwald. Didn't always agree with him, but I loved his satire. In some of the great classic literature, satire was used with devastating effect. Unfortunately, if you aren't familiar with the history and the times, it doesn't always come across as well in modern times. That is one of the great pities of the destruction of classical liberal education.


~~~

Amen !

"A modest proposal"...

Perhaps the most famous.

~~~

However, when about half our present population cannot read or pronounce most of the words in a 'Guffey's Reader', and many can't master a 'Dick and Jane' story, what are we left with?

Too many dull witted carping whiners.
~~~

Post Script...



I did enjoy Monty Python, but was difficult to understand at times, as the spoofs were a mile a minute, and you had to be quick.

Another satirist, under-rated, I think, was Benny Hill.


Hmm
This satire represents more than one of the troubling reasons that Affirmative Action should be scrapped. The notion of preferential treatment has existed since the beginning of man and we have all learned to live with it more or less. AA was a noble idea to manipulate preference to the benefit of society at large. Unfortunately it immediately fell into the hands of the wrong people. Dr. Adams highlight the two main groups. One group is the people who for various reasons would use AA to place minorities everywhere and anywhere they can, no matter what. The other group is the folks who won’t tolerate the idea of preferential treatment being extended to any other than the elite of our society. Through the efforts of these two groups, AA has hurt us much more than it has ever helped; and that’s too bad, because it was a good idea. AA was never meant to advance the unqualified. It was meant to create opportunities to some folks who would never have them otherwise despite not being the best qualified. Some things in life can look good on paper but just wont stand up to human nature.

christianlib
I always thought you to be a bit deranged in your thinking but not stupid. I may have to reconsider. Read the first paragraph. What Dr. Adams is saying is that "Shannon" is a fine young woman, but she needs to go to a law school that better fits her academic abilities based on her academic record. There are different levels of law schools with differing degrees of difficulty. So no, he is not being racist. He is trying to see to it that "Shannon" attend a school she is much more likely to succeed at. I graduated law school. If I had tried to go to Harvard Law School, it would have been a disaster for me.

I could point the racist finger at guys like you, trying to ram minorities into schools they don't qualify for, only to see them crushed when they fail. "Studies show" that the drop out rate is very high for those not in the shcool they actually have the talent for. My only conclusion is that racists like you want to see those uppity blacks put in their place by leading them to certain failure by your wrong-headed diversity policies.

For FeedFwd @ 09:36
You're right that doogie wouldn't understand Monty Pyton, even if it were delivered in cent-percent Americanese--as hasn't yet gotten UP to "D!ck & Jane", let alone "Noddy"!

additional flag needed
The stuff that blatherers of the "Doctor" Douglas ilk pollute TH with prompts me to suggest once again that another flag is needed.
Specifically, "Flag as foolish."

wbheff @ 10:13
Some other suggestions for TH:

Flag as idiotic,
Flag as moronic,
Flag as clueless,
Flag as vacuous,
Flag as irrelevant to the article (Such as this post.)
Flag as laughable.

Using any of these suggestions would sure help with the scrolling.

Regards

Stupid
Its too bad stupid isnt painful. Although if it was dr doogie would be on oxycontin.

Re: "Dr. Doug"
Sorry fellow Adams fans but I think YOU are being had by Dr. Doug. I suspect he is on some liberal site each morning posting stuff to tick off those dummies who think abortion is health care, Social Security is secure, the minimum wage is not zero, Obama is a uniter, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and other such tripe. He is playing a shrewd game of devil's advocate. I could be wrong. Maybe he is just another leftist academic who just doesn't get it but I ain't buyin' it. I suspect he'll "come out" on April 1st. Maybe he IS Mike Adams!

buster
That would be a good april fools joke. Especially considering Dr. Dung Beetle posts on many other TH columns as well, with the same sort of quackydoo. Maybe Adams has a shower in his office as he would need to frequent it regularly after pretending to be Douglass throughout the day.

buster
That would be a good april fools joke. Especially considering Dr. Dung Beetle posts on many other TH columns as well, with the same sort of quackydoo. Maybe Adams has a shower in his office as he would need to frequent it regularly after pretending to be Douglass throughout the day.

A VIOLATION of Federal Law

Mike Adams has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as ammended. That law states in part: ANY ACTION OR INACTION WHICH HAS A DISPORPORTINATE IMPACT ON ANY GROUP COVERED BY THE ACT SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO VIOLATE THE ACT." His second letter CLEARLY has a disporportinate impact on a covered party.

What I want to know is why we still need the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or any other civil rights act for that matter. Discrimination no longer exsists in America and that fact was CLEARLY demonstraited in the last national election. If there had been discrimination, Obama would NOT BE the president now.

So when are we going to get back to EVERYBODY being treated the same? How long are we going to continue this "most favored race/sex/sexual orientation" garbage? Are we going to keep
doing it until it completely ruins this nation? We don't have very far to go now until it does that.

Buster
You may be absolutely right about doogie but al lthat tells me is he is a spineless lefty lib who cant take a stand on anything. Besides he has an electronic "kick me" sign on his back LOL

$64,000 question
When will "minorities" be satisfied tha tthey are no longer discriminated agianst? What will it take to prove America is finally a "color blind" society? When will enough be enough? When can we expect EVERYONE to perform up to an agreed upon standard?

roy
You are letting your racism show again. Do you know Justice Thomas' academic record? It sounds like you are assuming Justice Thomas would have needed preferrential treatment to get into Yale. Maybe his academic performance alone all but insured he would be accepted.

n
No, Justice Thomas has commented on how he was accepted through AA and how he still feels pangs of guilt and inadequacy. That’s a shame because I think he has accomplished great things on his own. He may have been admitted to law school through AA but he made it to the Supreme Court on his own. Any debate in that area would have to focus on whether he is an inferior Justice or not.

Jeffrey
Actually, he's more than just half black and half white, but most people just looked at the black. Like I said before, he probably would not have been elected if people hadn't focused on skin color.

MikeR
You are correct about his accomplishments apart from AA which makes me believe he could have gotten into Yale without AA.

Mr Adams
If you can't write a favorable letter about Ms Jones, then you should have just declined like a decent human being. Letters of recommendation are not appropriate outlets for your partisan banter. You are doing exactly what we criticize liberal professors for. Check your political agenda at the door, or we won’t be able to tell liberals to do the same.

SSG R
You do realize he is making a point and there is no Ms Jones, correct?

n
coulda,woulda,shoulda. the fact remains that is how he got in.

Obama is Burris on the National Level
People only saw his color (like Burris) and now that they have a radical leftist kook spending every penny in sight they realize that their own white guilt has perpetuated a massive fraud on the American public. Soon the entire country will all have exactly what we have here in Chicago. A one party organized crime controlled government who gets all their pork barrel spending projects green lighted by the sycophants in the state controlled media. Their new motto is:
The Democratic Party, bringing the poverty of the welfare state to a suburb near you!

Welcome Back Barry can I see your REAL birth certificate? How about your college transcripts?. No? OK well I’ll just trust CNN then. Thanks anyway!

christianlib?
The point is simple - people should be judged by their accomplishments, not gender or race.

Numerous underqualified students are placed into programs they can not possibly be successful with the only criteria for their placement being a minority status.

It is much more racist to put someone in a no win situation than it is to give them an honest evaluation of their abilities. Dr. Adams letter of recommendation (yes, I know it is fake) showed an honest evaluation of the student's abilities.


"will shannon make as much as a white male student coming out of law school?

not according to every study done on the subject."

This is a flat out lie. Studies actually show that for the same work, women are paid better than men. This is especially true for female executives.

Character
Monkeyfish, regarding the oxymoron... I agree. Character is more important than are accomplishments. After all, William Jefferson Clinton looked good on paper, but was utterly lacking in good character, much like the idiot in the White House today.

n
In his autobiography, "My Grandfather's Son," he concedes he was admitted to Yale Law School in part because of his race,
http://www.newsweek.com/id/161228

Similar statements were made to Dennis Prager.
http://townhall.com/TalkRadio/Show.aspx?RadioShowID=3&Conte ntGuid=8b54ead4-9c5c-4dff-acba-aedc11a408db

Thomas’s bitterness over the way he was treated afterwards is expressed strongly. It is through that, he makes a strong case against AA. While he got on the Supreme Court through his own merit, he might never have had the chance without AA. I think that causes him internal conflict.

Douglas has just remodeled his house,
adding a new bathromm. To save money, he sawed his existing toilet in half, and it now fits him even better than before. However, in one of the bathrooms, he must face the wall. The benefits extend to his wife, who gets to excercise one leg at a time. The dog doesn't know what to think.

AA
Thats the problem with AA. It ALWAYS leaves open the question as to whether or not a person achieved their accomplishments through preferential treatment or their own merits. Its time for us to set a standard and then expect EVERYONE to achieve it. PERIOD!

NC Central
Not mentioned is that NC Central is a black college. And being a white guy who went to a black college, Shannon would be better off being at the bottom of the barrel at UNC than in the middle of mediocrity at NC Central, but that would then depend on her character and her striving to get her LSATs up and grades to be admitted on merit - I lasted a year at the black college on scholarship; the academics were none existent - it was worse than high school. And those that attend black colleges set themselves up for a career and lifetime of classist workfare, their skill always suspect in the workplace as being earned without merit - unless of course they end up in a purely black environment, which is the goal of the black college in the first place.

I hear Gabriels Horn!
On another column, Mellor said that he agreed with Dr. Adams today.

"n", regarding Justice Thomas
Justice Thomas may not have gotten into Yale back then without AA if for no other reason that when he applied there was still a fair amount of discrimination against blacks in many schools and without the AA-edge he may have had difficulty getting accepted no matter what his qualifications. And he obviously was able to handled the required coursework since Justice Thomas did graduate and then go on to greater things.

Justice
Regardless of skin color , you would be doing her a disfavor by not stating the truth . If she is not qualified , nothing you say will help her. Only if she qualifies herself is she fit or able to take on the responsibility .

Same thing with reading
Reading this brings to mind people who demand in college that their use of ebonics on tests, papers and thesis should be acceptable. As an employer of people who come in contact with and communicate with intelligent clients, I would not be able to hire people who use ebonics. They can make demands in school, but in the real world, proper English counts.

Speaking English
Reading this brings to mind people who demand in college that their use of ebonics on tests, papers and thesis should be acceptable. As an employer of people who come in contact with and communicate with intelligent clients, I would not be able to hire people who use ebonics. They can make demands in school, but in the real world, proper English counts.

Congratulations, Dan!
I think you've described the situation perfectly.

Well done.

The New AA
The old AA was "I can pass the test, just give me a chance".

The New AA is "I can't pass the test, so lower the standards."

Liberals are SO gullible
You people actually believe that Ms Jones is a real person. You just can't resist the urge to jump onto anything you feel offends SOMEBODY, NOT you, just SOMEBODY, Anybody! Get a life!

Since when is a white guy...
...allowed to speak to racial issues? Have we suddenly left AG Holding's cowardly nation behind? Or have you finally taken leave of your senses?! You can't test the mettle and character of a black person, especially a female. You're white! Don't you know your place?

I congratulate you for your moral courage. I sincerely hope that Shannon appreciates your honesty and chooses the option that will provide her with the best outcome. If she's been a student of yours for 4 years, I strongly suspect she will. I also suspect she will sense the genuine love and respect for her that is unmistakably evident in the choice you present to her in your letters. If you thought she was an "entitled victim" rather than a smart, capable American, I don't think you would have dealt with her pending decision in this manner.

Shannon Seems Sharp
enough to understand ObamaSpeak/Write. Please share this with Shannon, all the professors at all the schools you can and your known world. See if understand ObamaSpeak/Write:
This will take some thinking on the part of readers of this post, but give it a try. If you have questions, please ask for clarification.
It has taken me awhile - 45 years of studying Islam with Muslims, at grad level, 8x to Middle East since '04, world travel before and since including to Africa and Asia, more years dealing with international relations, national defense and politics at all levels+a few other things, but I have figured out finally ObamaSpeak/Write.
Muslim or not - I will not argue that point here - Obama is as he has spoken/written strongly influenced by Muslims, Black Separatists, Socialists, Communists, terrorists and other worthies.
Obama has a plan. He spoke/wrote about it in his 2 books, "campaign rhetoric" - his words, platform as a candidate, in the Obama/Biden Plan - whitehouse.gov - elsewhere and is putting it into effect as fast as he can before too many get it clear.
His plan is to bankrupt the U.S. fully, to the point we will welcome those who have the $$ - oil-holding, producing and other countries, like China. Then we will be in dhimmi.
You can figure it all out as I have by studying all he has done before, on and since 1/20/09. Forget all your beliefs, Western thinking and know a key tenet of Islam is to "seduce (fool) 'em until strong enough to take them over."

Posters, many... & Black Prince...

Several of you, clearly understood that there never existed this "Shannon" lady.

Dr. Adams never sent those two letters, nor anything like them to any person or institution.


IT IS SATIRE !

Satire to make a point.

As 'Black Prince' posted, he clearly understands the damage being done, and my only quibble with his post,

Re: his first paragraph : "Mike Adams has violated Title VII "

and his subsequent statements, is :

I think 'Black Prince' should have said,

IF Dr. Adams had actually done this...
"Mike Adams has violated Title VII... "


YES ! Black Prince, you are on MY 'Always Read List' !

Well done Sir!



FeedFwd...


FeedFwd
Location: TX
Reply # 24
Date: Feb 27, 2009 - 9:36 AM EST Monty Python...
I'll bet Dr Doug didn't get that either. Satire is great stuff. I remember as a kid first thing after checking the box scores, turning to the op ed pages to see if there was an article by Art Buchwald. Didn't always agree with him, but I loved his satire. In some of the great classic literature, satire was used with devastating effect. Unfortunately, if you aren't familiar with the history and the times, it doesn't always come across as well in modern times. That is one of the great pities of the destruction of classical liberal education.

~~~

FeedFwd,

I often read some column comments, 2 or 3 times when it is interesting as this one is.

I replied to this earlier, in. re. Monty Python and The Flying Circus.

I would like to add one more comment. vis a vis your post...

" an article by Art Buchwald. Didn't always agree with him, but I loved his satire. "

AMEN. And, you have dated yourself.

Me too.


The Rat


Rich D.

Rich D.
Location: PA
Reply # 52
Date: Feb 27, 2009 - 1:09 PM EST Douglas has just remodeled his house,
adding a new bathroom. To save money, he sawed his existing toilet in half, and it now fits him even better than before. However, in one of the bathrooms, he must face the wall. The benefits extend to his wife, who gets to excercise one leg at a time. The dog doesn't know what to think.

~~~

Rich D.

" now fits him even better than before... " I concur.
~~

" However, in one of the bathrooms, he must face the wall. "

Finally he meets someone as low in intellect as himself.
~~

" one leg at a time. The dog doesn't know what to think. "

Poor confused dog.

However, I am certain this poor dog has been confused many times at this house.



Still laughing here.


Black Prince...
Black Prince
Location: GA
Reply # 38
Date: Feb 27, 2009 - 11:30 AM EST A VIOLATION of Federal Law

Mike Adams has violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as ammended. That law states in part: ANY ACTION OR INACTION WHICH HAS A DISPORPORTINATE IMPACT ON ANY GROUP COVERED BY THE ACT SHALL BE PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF INTENT TO VIOLATE THE ACT." His second letter CLEARLY has a disporportinate impact on a covered party.

What I want to know is why we still need the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or any other civil rights act for that matter. Discrimination no longer exsists in America and that fact was CLEARLY demonstraited in the last national election. If there had been discrimination, Obama would NOT BE the president now.

So when are we going to get back to EVERYBODY being treated the same? How long are we going to continue this "most favored race/sex/sexual orientation" garbage? Are we going to keep
doing it until it completely ruins this nation? We don't have very far to go now until it does that.

~~~

See my comments above.

I alwys read your posts.


The Rat

AT LEAST two standards...
will and should continue. "Male and female created he them" means that the two genders are actually VERY different, and God made them to BE different! Rejoice in it!
Now, as far as the differences between "victims" and everybody else--that's a different story. There is a minority of our population who are taught from babyhood to "beg" for what they want. ("I can have that??") They are almost born with their hands held out--and taught carefully that if everybody else doesn't put in that hand exactly what they want; that they are to vandelize, riot, rape, and steal until they DO--because they are "down trodden and oppressed" and "They owes it to us".
UNTIL we learn to NOT be guilty when we TURN DOWN one of these shysters; we will continue to allow a double standard, us against them...

Poor Mikey
Poor poor Mikey. Keep working hard to try to make those liberal mad, Mikey boy!

Maybe one day you'll have your own wikipedia biography.

God, it's awesome watching the impotent rage of conservatives manifest itself at townhall.com. Mike Adams is a pretty awesome example of a white, male Protestant who thinks that he's oppressed by society.

Nice post, Tommy boy
Actually, most of the rage I've seen in the political arena comes from libbies, who are outraged that the average American knows better than to buy into the "progressive" agenda.

As for Dr. Dougie, only an imbecile could fail to see the logical conclusion derived from comparing the content of these two letters, and only a blind, deluded fool could fail to understand that this phenomenon is both real and destructive to the American way of life.

RE: terence
"Actually, most of the rage I've seen in the political arena comes from libbies, who are outraged that the average American knows better than to buy into the "progressive" agenda."

Yeah, I guess that explains why we crushed the life out of you in the last election. Clearly the American people hate Obama. LOL.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.