Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, May 19, 2008
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
University Awards Criminal Justice Degree to Cocaine Dealer
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



This will be, without question, the most difficult column I’ve ever had to write. But the drug problem at UNC-Wilmington (where I teach) has gotten so widespread that I have to say something. To do otherwise would be professional malpractice even if it means commenting on recent cases involving some of my students.

Just last year I told one of my upper level classes that, under our Constitution, states should have the right to pass laws allowing for the execution of drug dealers. That does not mean that I actually support the execution of drug dealers but that the Eight Amendment should not prohibit it. Nor should it prohibit the execution of sixteen year old killers or those who rape adults. The Supreme Court obviously disagrees.

I did not know that at the time a student listening to my lecture was facing imminent arrest and prosecution for dealing powdered cocaine in very high volumes. Just before his arrest I was tipped off by a police officer who informed me that he was in deep enough to make multiple home purchases with cash. This was despite the fact that he was only twenty years old.

Naturally, he soon found himself out of school and in the plea bargaining process. Remarkably, he was able to negotiate a plea that resulted in only a few months of consecutive jail time. Thus, after only missing one full semester of school he returned to UNC-Wilmington in the spring of 2008 while still serving prison time on the weekends. He received his B.A. in Criminal Justice from UNCW on May 10th.

Shortly after his graduation I sent a letter to him to see how he was holding up and what he planned to do in the future. He thanked me for not looking down on him for what he had done adding that it meant a great deal to him. Of course, the notion that I do not look down on him for what he did is rather silly. I just decided not to bother communicating my feelings of disappointment to him. I will instead direct my comments elsewhere.

First, and most obviously, the criminal justice system has failed in this case. People who engage in widespread dealing of highly addictive illegal drugs should be given a chance to rat out other dealers in exchange for lighter sentences. But the reduction should be from decades to years, not from years to mere months. Such light sentences fail to take seriously the damaged lives left in the wake of illegal activity like that of my student. Cocaine destroys lives and heavy dealers should be punished heavily.

Second, there has been an obvious failure of leadership within the ranks of our university administration. It could be argued that a student should eventually be readmitted to UNCW even after a felony conviction for cocaine dealing. But the notion of a) only having the student sit out one semester and b) readmitting him before he even finished serving his sentence for cocaine trafficking is preposterous.

How can we make a judgment about whether the student is rehabilitated if he has not yet finished his sentence? Is there some reason why we have so much confidence in him? Or are we simply holding him to a lower standard because he is a minority? Do we just expect our Hispanic students to traffic in cocaine? Are we motivated by a racism that is almost too subtle to detect?

Finally, I cannot express how deeply disappointed I am in my own department. When I became aware of this situation I naturally passed the information along to some of my colleagues. When I told a Marxist feminist in the department she simply laughed and made a joke about “applied learning” among the criminal justice students.

I respect all of my colleague’s rights to make jokes - in fact I wish they would laugh more often. But this is certainly no laughing matter. It is not the first time we have had a criminal justice student deeply involved in the dissemination of illegal drugs. And if we don’t start to take the problem seriously we will suffer further damage to our department’s reputation.

Just a few days before we conferred a criminal justice degree on a confessed cocaine dealer university police conducted a drug raid at a UNCW dorm. The range of drugs involved was great but a couple of arrests were for possession and distribution of very small amounts of marijuana.

The recent UNCW drug raid has many wondering whether we should be arresting students who are only involved in the possession or sale of marijuana. I’m wondering whether the students were making a valuable contribution to diversity.

To be continued …

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Greetings All
Frankly i do not care what the united States Or the people who live here have to say. Eight years ago after watching this stupid country vote a regular cocaine user in for president. I do not care what happens here anymore. I have to say if you let one into the highest office then what the hell does it matter if a regular person wants to finish a stupid degree. Who cares if someone deals cocaine if nobody bought it then there would be nothing to worry about.

Thank you, Anne!!
...for recognizing the whole point of this article: the irony of one being awarded a Criminal Justice degree after being arrested for dealing ILLEGAL drugs. The school/admin is too boneheaded to see that this guy BROKE the law and should have been kicked out of school, in the first place!

Smoking pot or doing other drugs recreationally is one thing(I do not CONDONE this behavior) but the sale and distribution is something else, esp. from one who is persuing a degree in CRIMINAL JUSTICE!!!

Judgment??
"How can we make a judgment about whether the student is rehabilitated if he has not yet finished his sentence?"

Uh, well, you can't make that judgement, so don't even worry about it. You work for a University, not the justice system. It's not your place to make a judgment. Shut up and do your damn job.

Will's soul
//will Location: CA
Reply # 3
Date: May 19, 2008 - 1:03 AM EST
Subject: Mike,
[snip]
I love you all. I believe you all, too, can properly come to your senses (the rational folks anyway), given a bit of time & soul-searching. (Remember, I said the RATIONAL among you - not the supernaturally inclined!).
//
----------
I'm confused. How can you assign value to an entity you cannot prove (i.e., your soul) but then deny the viability of a supernaturally influenced decision process?

Cheers everybody.

SC Harvard student murdered her mother
This is an old story, but interesting.

Here is he hyperlink:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE4DE1E3E F937A25757C0A963958260

What is the name
Does anyone know the name of the UNCW student?

Dear Mike
The obvious moral absurdities of all this aside, my question is this: What does this guy intend to do with his criminal justice degree? Become a cop? Go to law school? The man is a convicted felon and drug trafficker! Don't "little" items like that mean anything anymore? Just how does he intend to apply that degree? Except, perhaps, as a means for avoiding prosecution for ongoing crimes in the future. Am I just being unreasonably cynical... or has academia put the questioning such practices in its "politically incorrect" category?

letmeatwhatever
You make a very good point. COnservatives have an expectation that individuals will take a stand against inappropriate behavior. They have made a huge issue of Obama not denouncing the reverened Wright, at least right away.

Why is there no such expectation from conservatives for Mike Adams? Based on Adams own judgement of the situation, I expect him to resign his position.

letemeatfreehealthcare
Are you saying that it’s ok for Adams to reject your principles like Obama has, or are you saying that it’s a bad thing to reject your principles?

Of course the third alternative is that you are being like too many conservatives and liberals by saying it’s wrong when the other guy does it but it’s ok when my guy does it. Speaking of which, we have the reference to drug use. Dr. Adams has admitted to heavy drug use in the past. Should we reject both men as flawed and ignore what they have to say or do we give Adams a pass again?

Your speaking out.
Thanks Mike for speaking out. Our marxist/socialist University cultures are the achilles heal of our future as a democracy and the rule of law . One person can make a difference priciple is applied to your courage in this comment. Thank you for that greatly.

Are You Willing To Pay
for the treatment of an addict on drugs? Our tax dollars can and should be used to help students who really want to make a difference in our society.

Education does not help, some addicts do get help and some never will, they go to treatment just to beat the system, I know first hand as I worked for 28 years at a treatment center and could smell a fake when they walked in the door.

We need to get the Liberal Democrats out of office, yes, they want people addicted to drugs and that is what will keep them in office, they really don't care about the Citizens of the U.S., why should they, they can get cheap labor with the illegals they bring in.

Obama is as bad as they come and for anyone to say they will vote for anyone but a Republican is part of the system we are facing today. To make a difference, vote the thugs out and replace with someone who can and will make a difference, only make it clear to who ever you vote for that you expect something in return or they are out. Call your Senators, Representatives and let them know what you stand for, they will listen and maybe wise up before its to late.

Go to http://www.NumbersUSA.com and get the facts that face this country and then act, don't just sit at the computer and write to us, do something constructive and let your voice be heard at Congress.
Joy

Please, stop.
Again, I have to agree Dr. Adams. Its that darn gay issue that he and I disagree. Let's hope that this graduate will have to still face some problems getting employment in his chosen field.

DON'T RESIGN, MIKE!
Jack writes, "Dr Mike is a conserv-uh-tive. Conserv-uh-tives believe in principles. They believe in standing up for what is right. So why is Mike Adams still working for such a corrupt department? WHy hasn't he resigned?"

Jack, probably for the same reason Obama Shama likes hanging around indicted criminals like Tony Rezco and racists like the Reverend Wrong. Like cocaine, I guess it sorta gets in the blood, speaking of which Obama as also screwed around with - not to mention grass!


There is a town in Scotland
where some years ago a young girl was raped, a very unusual occurrence. Some days later, people going to work were confronted by the ugly sight of a man hanging by the neck from a lamp post, with his hands bound behind his back. The perpetrators were never caught, and there has not been another rape in that town from that day forward.

Lot to be said for summary punishment.

TheEnigma47 (#79)
People may well laugh, but it's not as absurd as many people think. We're definitely moving that way, especially with Christianity being defined in some quarters as a mental abberation.

When I was a college professor, my faith in Jesus Christ was regarded as rather an oddity, even by those of my colleagues who otherwise thought well of me.

Perhaps someone will find a "cure"!

Strange days indeed (most peculiar mama).

Ratas y Ratones (#10)
Thanks for noticing, and glad that you got a laugh out of it. That was my only intention, really. I was just having a bit of fun.

I don't have anything against Will or anyone else. It just gets so tiresome pointing out the anti-Christian bigotry of Will and many others that humor is the only way I can point it out without experiencing a spike in my blood pressure!

I respect anyone who can defend his views rationally, Christian, atheist, or what have you. There are some deeply ignorant and bigoted people who call themselves Christians, for instance. I certainly don't respect them, even though we claim to worship the same God.

I'm sure that Will perceives himself as having been the victim of bigotry. One of the most hateful things about bigotry is that its victims so often become its practitioners.

Anyone, just a long way of saying "thanks" for the post.


Ooga Booga!

Norman the Caveman

Future Actions at unc-w
Year 2010:

Today, officials at unc-w announced the expulsion of several students for actions that violated recently revised university rules and policies. These students were found to have been distributing Christian RELIGIOUS materials from their dorm rooms. One student was found to be in the possession of more than a dozen banned Christian books called The HOLY BIBLE. This book alone could be reason for expulsion, but these students also possessed other Christian religious materials as well as pictures of the man they call Jesus Christ. All materials were seized and destroyed immediately before they could infect the minds of other students. The university finds it an absolute crime to possess these Christian items even though they are not considered criminal by any state or federal statue. As the spokeswoman said, "We must protect our students from such Christian materials. It wasn't as if they were reading the koran" or planning violent jihad against the US Government. As the unc-w spokeswoman makes it clear, "We find that possession of Christian religious materials often leads to additional religious activities such as attending religious services, making donations to religious organizations and worst of all, acknowledging a belief in and praying to GOD. We just cannot tolerate these Christian activities."

Whoooa Here, We Missed the Point
Dr Mike is a conserv-uh-tive. Conserv-uh-tives believe in principles. They believe in standing up for what is right. So why is Mike Adams still working for such a corrupt department? WHy hasn't he resigned?

Mike, stand up man! Stick to your principles. Resign now!

Obamas scariest yet
Subject: Obamas scariest statement yet
"Islam can be compatible with the modern world. It can be a partner with the Christian & Jewish & Hindu & Buddhist faiths in trying to create a better world." Barak Obama 2008
Democratic Compassion Forum at Messiah College Apr 13, 2008

compatible = capable of existing together in harmony.
Islam is a 700 AD religion and has NO rights for women.

partner = to join as a partner.
Islam and the Jewish religion partners?
================================================

Of all the things Obama has said this is by far the scariest.

Obama thinks Hamas and Iran can become partners with America and Israel?

“At the “World Without Zionism” conference held in Tehran in October 2005, as the crowd
chanted “death to Israel, death to America, death to England,” the Iranian President
Ahminajead said...with the help of the Almighty, we shall soon experience a world without America and Zionism, notwithstanding those who doubt.”

Obama is talking about negotiating with the madman from Iran who has stated in no uncertain
terms that America and Israel will be destroyed in Ahminajeads lifetime?


UNC can gradute a coke dealer
But let a student get caught with a single joint and he loses all chance of getting federal education money.

This is just more proof that we have Lost the war on drugs. If the idiots want to pull out of a war, I suggest we start with the war on drugs, and then move on to the war on poverty.

In a country where I'm supposed to be a free adult, I face the threat of incarceration in my state because I'm a medical marijuana patient, but it's not legal in my state yet.

Because I want a chance to live a relatively normal life, I'm considered a drug offender.

of course the only wars our lib friends want out of are the ones that impact our national security.


Drugs
I am in favor of freedom. However, now that our society is funding health care and welfare, what someone else does that increases the number of people who need health care and support makes it my business and the business of every other tax payer who does not indulge in self-harming practices. Granted unpopular laws against actions that many people want makes enforcing them very difficult. We are becoming more and more a scofflaw country. I perceive that to a serious threat to the safety of everyone. What are the main reasons we need government (Federal)? I write: 1. Protect us from foreign enemies 2. Protect us from fellow citizens 3. Maintain a stable currency. All the rest is added complexity and difficulty and of secondary importance. That seems to have led to detriment of the three main functions of a central government.
Donald W. Bales

Universities
If this action at UNCW is accepted as norm, the entire United States is in deep doodoo. At the University level we should be teaching our students about respect for the law not rewarding illegal activity, and especially huge trafficing of serious amounts of illegal drugs. The fact that this student not only was accepted back into college after just one term, giving him the degree in criminal justice is down right apalling.

God help us all.

NC Wilmington Crock of Crap!
Mike... you are better than these people! Why the hell don't you just get to hell outa there???

Jesse
"You either believe in individual liberty, or you do not."

Liberals clearly do not.

David Brainerd II
BTW, Yale, in a tacit admission of severity in Brainerd's case, posthumously named a building after the man.

Conservative Hypocrisy
This issue is always good for exposing hypocrisy in a great many people who claim to be conservative.

To me, it's very simple. You either believe in individual liberty, or you do not.

Unless and until someone's drug use harms your person or property, it is none of the government's business.

All of the arguments in favor of the War on Drugs are rubbish, but that hardly matters. "Social conservatives" in particular often have no intellectually-coherent basis for their beliefs (e.g. George Bush, John McCain). They are as unlikely to be moved by reason as any moonbat liberal.

There will always be people who will destroy themselves, whether by alcohol or gambling or drugs or sex or shopping or eating or any d*mned thing you care to name. J*sus, I thought liberals were supposed to be the Utopians.

The world would be a lot better place if we all tended to our own business.

David Brainerd
What became of the good ol' days? In 1740 or so David Brainerd was expelled from Yale for saying, about one of the staff, "He has the grace of this chair." Pleas for readmission were refused by the administration.

If it is OK for a Wanna-be President
Whats the big deal. Barak Obama our soon to be President(shudder) admitted to snorting cocaine and smoking pot while in college.

Get tough
"As a former addiction counsellor, I have to say that legalization would be of no help in the fight against drug use in this country."

Why are we fighting drug use? Drugs are used in helpful and responsible ways all the time. You want a solution to the problem of drug _abuse_? It's called Death.

We need a gun culture where we're all trained gun owners protecting ourselves and ours against theft and robbery from the drug abuser. Chances of death is pretty high.

We need to let drug addicts die. While I would attempt to help those who I cared about, there should be no government intervention until they commit a crime and harm someone else. Throw 'em in jail with no treatment.

As long as the responsible are punished along with the abusers and as long as abusers are protected from the consequences of their behavior, we will have a pervasive drug abuse problem in our society.

Dealers? More power to 'em.

cocaine used to sold in tins
Like aspirin tins, in little pills. It was considered a cheap substitute for alcohol just to let you know how much it really costs to produce.

Legalizing pot is simply sane, there are so many negatives associated with it's illegality, the only documented drawbacks to pot that the prohibition types can come up with are related to it's legal status, not it's pharmacology.

Make growing your own pot legal, controlled just like making your own whiskey is controlled.
There's a huge laundry list of things that would START to go right with our culture after that, like young folks not instantly distrusting authority since they see with their own eyes that pot prohibition is not based on the given arguement but "whos financial ox is getting gored".

Make smuggling ANYTHING worthy of the death penalty since smuggling can be turned to a military weapon instantly, just add money. Make creating, smuggling or distribution of "the powders" worthy of the death penalty.

One other thing, heave drug use IS self limiting if it's really cheap. The users can always get $5 for a weeks worth of cocaine, because thats all its really worth without prohibition. They May then gently remove themselves from the gene pool if they or their friends & family cant reform them.
Self solving problem.

Quick edit - strike four!
You wrote, "It could be argued that a student should eventually be readmitted to UNCW even after a felony conviction for cocaine dealing."

My edit would have read, "It could be argued that a student should be readmitted to UNCW even after a felony conviction for cocaine dealing eventually."

Quick edit - strike three!
You wrote, "I will instead direct my comments elsewhere."

My edit would have read, "My comments will be directed elsewhere." First-person references are indications of pride, Mike.

Quick edit - strike two!
You wrote, "Just before his arrest I was tipped off by a police officer who informed me that he was in deep enough to make multiple home purchases with cash."

My edit would have read, "A police officer prior to the student's arrest tipped me off that he was in deep enough to make multiple home purchases with cash."

Quick edit - strike one!
You wrote, "the Eight Amendment should not prohibit it."

My edit would have read, "the Eighth Amendment should not prohibit it."

Cocaine-endowed Chair, Criminal Justice
Professor Adams, you may want to check with the university's Development Office.

Mike is right - the university does not
know if this "student" is truly repentant or just sorry that he was caught! Who knows what else he was involved in: was he also running guns? Guns usually go with drugs. I would not have been so quick to allow him back in the university. Did any of his customers become addicted? Were they students also?

Conga
It is not taxed as high as cigs in comparison to the damage it has done to society.That sir is my point.

Just in case any of you didn't realize
Legalization of all narcotic has been tried. The Dutch don't seem to see it as a wonderful social success that all of you claim it will be.

jax33, look at the alcohol taxation system before you write anything else so uninformed. We already tax the hell out of it.

Ken
You addressed an above post to "Will and other Libs". I take it from this that you think you are a conservative and that the legalization of drugs is a liberal position.

You have it backwards my friend. Socialism and leftist ideology is all about controlling what the masses do. Liberals constantly bewail the “sins” and failures of society at large and believe that if they just get enough control and pass enough legislation, they can fix everything and create a perfect world.

It’s never going to happen. We will never be able to legislate away human nature. You may think that drug use should be an exception because it is SO destructive. But what happens when the empowered Libs decide that you are doing irreparable harm to your children by instructing them in your religious views? They will label it brainwashing and put you in prison for it. Or how about Liberals deciding how parents should discipline their children because a spanking is SO cruel and abusive?

If we follow our Constitution the way it was written, and subscribe to the principles of a free society the way our founders intended, there will be a lot of people who will engage in destructive behavior, but at least you will be free to live your own life as you see fit, and you won’t have to fear that the health police will come knocking on your door at 2 am because you decided to have a hot fudge sundae.

drugs
alcohol has killed more innocent people than cigs.They should treat alcohol the way they do cigs.Claim it is a health menace then tax the hell out of it.I do not smoke ,but I do occasionely drink.I never have more than two drinks in a day.As to cigs,I have yet to have any anti cig people explain to me ,that why is it that most people who smoke or have smoked never get cancer.The anti cig campaign was nothing more than a massive tax increase on a certain segment of the population.

Hey Doc!
Thanks for the update. It does answer the question of your students from your past article.

By the way, I don't know if the university could have stopped him from getting his degree, but they certainly could have delayed it for a while. Maybe even long enough to force him to go elsewhere. No, it certainly doesn't look good to have a convicted coke dealer getting a degree in Criminal Justice!
But at least the next alumni party will be more exciting!

I agree with Yooper
and I question whether a state-supported school should even admit a criminal. Where is the "zero tolerance" that is so stringently upheld in grade schools?

Now I'll throw something else out. When I was a youngster we were warned to keep our noses clean or we wouldn't be admitted to college, we would be very restricted as to the types of jobs we might be able to get, etc. Think of it this way: you started earning your degree by not breaking the law. Thirty-five years later colleges have faced declining numbers of college age potential students, so they have opened their doors to people who would not have qualified, academically or morally, back when I was a student.

A local junior college wants to re-route a street to "prevent terrorist attacks." When asked, the president admitted that many of the students have criminal records.

You can put up all the barriers and pass all the anti-gun laws you want, but if a college makes it a practice to admit students who already have criminal records there's not much point to it, is there?

Ken
1. Most gays live happy, healthy (sometimes even "spiritual") lives.

2. The gay population learned from the AIDS epidemic of the 1980's. P.S. AIDS is caused from a VIRUS; it is not "God's wrath" (nor was the Black Plague, leprosy, tuberculosis or cancer).

3. Your man-made religion has taught you to view homosexuality as an "abomination" (a perspective of ancient jews living in the middle east 2500 years ago; the nomads who made up the stories that were later collected into a "bible", a sort of anthology of their "greatest hits" of cultural literature). You, therefore, view homosexuality through the lens of specific cultish ancient jewish notions. Homosexuality is not a "new" phenomenon. It is as old as heterosexuality I am sure, and has thousands of years of tradition.

4. I'm sorry for your cousin. But you sound like a family (from North Carolina?) that would probably never accept a homosexual family member no matter how he was raised. It sounds to me like your family was the real culprit in the tragedy, with your intolerances and fears and a headful of a literalistic bible used to inform your prejudices.


Renny ... you are obviously an idiot
First, return to school and this time stay in class, and don't play with drugs so you can learn to think in, and write in, complete sentences. Also, you might try writing your posts in a word processor and run spell check ... just a suggestion. If you were to accomplish these two things your weak battle to legalize your drug of choice would at least be presented in some sort of logical and readable fashion.

We have toyed with this "legalization of marijuana" for long enough, and there is weak evidence that it may make (well at least suffering) some pain easier. It does not "cure" anything. Now, you argue to leaglize drugs, and first question is ... which ones? All of them. You must be crazy. That is what we need, more "drunks" driving around. Have we not witnessed enough destruction from the dreaded drunk drivers? You want also to have pharmacies filling prescriptions for cocaine, marijuana, heroin, and methamphetamines? You have lost your mind. Perhaps you only mean to make SOME of these poisons legal. Which ones? Which will be the next drug of choice to ruin our great nation? Alcohol has done enough, and it is sure not the scourge that crack cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines are. Where do you draw the line?

You libs scream that there is a slippery slope for anything that treads on something you want to have protected. Therefore, can you not see the slippery slope that legalizing one or more of these poisons will create? The door will be open, and the vermin that want to sell these poisons to our kids will stream through to the courts to make this market work for them.

Wake up ...

re: renny
Your points are all valid except if we legalize drugs we must drop the cost and increase the purity to as close to 100% as possible. That will insure that we only lose one generation to this scourge. I know it sounds heartless but the fact is that narcotics (as opposed to the generic drugs) are lethal without proper control. Those people who wish to use them for recreational purposes will ultimately kill themselves off. Additionally, I propose a mandatory death penalty for anybody convicted for driving under the influence of narcotics not prescribed by a doctor. In fact a mandatory death penalty for the any crime committed while under the influence of un-prescribed narcotics. That should hurry along the natural culling process nicely.

Sorry to sound harsh but I had a broken jaw, nose, skull fracture and 680 stitches to put my face back together because of a doper on reds. I have no mercy in my heart for this particular crime.

WHAT happened to his Paid For Houses??
I, being a retired Correction Officer, 16+ yrs., can tell you that if All of his properties were not RICOed, he probably used them to bribe, Yes, BRIBE!! a JUDGE, or The State's Attorney, for a lighter, or, no sentence at all! BTW, you should thank Heaven that he didn't spend any more time in "Crime College"-[th' Joint] where he could learn from the more adept Convicts,how to get away with Murder, and lots of other more Violent crimes.

Will
I failed to see the connection between cocaine and que3rs. And I have serious doubts about how many flamers will take advantage of this new law, anyway. Why come home to Biff or Chad every night when you can flit from stall to stall sodomizing strangers? Isn't that more exciting to you all?

Will and Other Libs
The cost of drug use and addiction is staggering. Time and space here is too short to go into all the well known metrics. And, the supposed benefits of medical marijuana is, at best, tenuous, and far overshadowed by the societal costs in troubled families, wrecked cars and lives, and damaged relationships. Further, as a matter of debate the attempt to redirect the conversation from illegal to some other drug (alcohol) is not solving anything. We, as a nation of reasonable people, should be able to weigh the costs, and stop destructive behaviors. But, to try to argue for legalizing one bad choice because another is (currently) legal, is stupid.

And now for my favorite pagan, Will. What the Courts in California have done is legalize (albeit) temporarily a destructive behavior. When the good citizens of the state come to the polls and (again) voice their desire to overturn this horrible decision, I hope you will be as gleeful (not) as I to come here and sound the celebration. I fully expect to see some venom pour from your pen as you trumpet the disaster for homosexuality. Maybe someday you will understand the ugliness of this behavior and the species destructiveness of it, as well. There are consequences to be paid for this abomination, and I can only hope you are not one to suffer them. I lost a cousin to AIDS and it was not pretty. He made a choice, and I could only sadly bear the loss. He was a talented musician and a sad person all wrapped up in family disaster. We were near the same age, and all his cousins watched as his deranged Mother tried to rear him as a girl (which is what she wanted), and she destroyed a good person. He hated her for this, and went far away to SF to live out his few remaining months. And when the end came he forbade his parents to be there, and had himself interred in SF. I hope God was merciful to him in death, there was none for him in life.

We should legalize drugs
Prohibition doesn't work AND the liberal agenda that has embedded drugs in our children's culture should be lightened by legalization

1)take the money out of dealing

2) take the crime out of dealing

3) would take guns and violence off the streets (3/4's of all prisoners are in for drugs)

4) free minorities from filling the jails and prisons (2/3's of prisoners are minorities)

5) release Columbian and Afghanistan peasants from having their only cash-crops poisoned and destroyed; get the Delata Forces out of Columbia and send them to Iraq

6) eliminate the DEA and all its bureaucracy; free untold funds from state and local law enforcement devoted to drugs;

7) maintain school curricula with anti-drug messages

8) allowe drs. and dentists to prescribe

9) guarantee drug purity through pharmaceutical dispensing

10) take away the *outlaw* and *hip* attributes of drug dealing

I could not agree more with Dr. Adams
The dealers of the highly addictive drug of cocaine need to suffer as much if not more so then the users who get hooked on it. I speak from experience. Seven years ago, my wife and I attended a party in an affluent neighborhood. A woman who was a doctor, came up to me and blew smoke in my mouth. I thought it was marijuana, it wasn't...it was crack cocaine. She did the same thing to my wife. In seven years we went thru $600,000, lost two homes, I was fired from my job of 16 years, my kids were taken away, and my marriage with the love of my life is over. Toward the end, my wife and I would teach Sunday school high on crack. I would go for days on end and never sleep. I have lost everything I love honor and cherish. Crack cocaine is an equal opportunity destroyer. It doesn't care if you are democrat or republican,liberal or conservative, atheist or a believer, rich or poor. It will bring you down to the level of being sub-human. I have lost everything. What has my dealer suffered? He just bought a $700,000 home. Something is seriously wrong with this picture!


Some will always use drugs
Drugs should be legalized. There are a certain percentage of people who will always abuse drugs, whether or not they are legal. Making drugs illegal just compounds the problem of addiction, and ends up drawing all kind sof people into the criminal justice system who should not be there.

audi R10
bingo-you have it right.
The problem with "drugs" is that they aren't efficient killers- we need a drug that users love and kills them in a few years- subtly so they don't quit using.

I anticipate ...
... that this guy is not going to be the next Judge Roy Bean.


Middle School is the same
One of my 8th grade students was caught red-handed with a large bag of pot. Large. Read "intent to distribute." He was suspended for ONE DAY and came back the next day a hero to the other kids. He'll be waiting in the boy's room for new customers to pressure.

The rub
“How can we make a judgment about whether the student is rehabilitated if he has not yet finished his sentence?”

You see? That’s the rub. You AREN’T supposed to make a judgment!

Re-admitting him even before he has finished his sentence is just another opportunity for the university to demonstrate their non-judgementalism. The school doesn’t care about the student.

A few questions
I am not familiar with the actual work that could be done with a criminal justice degree. I assume it is a means of qualifying one to work in some legal capacity.

If a person involved in law enforcement either as a judge, attorney or "cop" were to be involved in the same set of circumstances would they be allowed to remain in their job? I would assume no, but I don't have background in those areas.

Would this be grounds for disbarring an attorney?

Would this be grounds for denying a security clearance ?

Tibby

Legalization is No Solution
As a former addiction counsellor, I have to say that legalization would be of no help in the fight against drug use in this country.

Those who claim that free-market access to narcotics and other addicting substances will alleviate the problem miss two seemingly obvious points.

1. They're addicting. There is no reason for a dealer (legal or otherwise) to lower the price for a given drug, given that users will pay whatever the going rate is for their next hit. The limiting factor isn't price, but how much money the user has in his or her pocket. If Joe Crackhead has $20, he'll buy a 20 rock. $50? A 50 rock. If he doesn't have any money, he'll break into someone's home to steal a DVD for drug money. And if he has $10,000, he'll use until he's either broke or dead.

2. Making drugs legal won't turn users into contributing members of society. Once again, it's addicting. Users think of little else beyond how to get their next score. They are, by definition, unlikely to be able to hold down gainful employment of any sort. Therefore, they're going to have find some way to finance their habit. No job? No money? No problem. Steal what you need for that next rock. It won't matter if you're buying from a CVS Crack Center or the guy on the corner.

Clearly our current efforts to control drug use in this country aren't working. But legalization certainly isn't the answer. All that will result in is more first-timers experimenting and finding themselves trapped in a vicious addition.

Degrees to Criminals
The subject at hand, is giving degrees to criminals, not the legalization of drugs.

What is an avowed criminal doing getting a Criminal Justice degree? Is he intending to become a law officer? Wouldn't he just become another turning-a-blind-eye type? Or would he take bribes to do so? Or, is he sincerely hoping to change his whole life and go straight?

If he intends to go straight, fine. As a Catholic, I would have to return the fruit of my sins -- the properties he bought from his drug dealing -- in order to be forgiven and start afresh. Is that what this dealer intends to do? If he donates the properties to a real charity and reforms his life, then great. Otherwise, this degree and his future are a farce, or worse, as far as I am concerned.

Laura Cap, post #25
I am inclined to agree with you. Still, I would make the distinction that people should be serving time for the CRIMES they committed to obtain drugs, not the drug usage itself.


Adams is an Optimist....

This individual - what will this convict be doing with his degree? As a minority, he likely will benefit from affirmative action and thus displace a law-abiding white male for a job in, likely, LAW ENFORCEMENT.

Yep, watch him become a cop. I would not be surprised at all to see this. It will be done underhandedly and quietly but he will get a job.

And the kid who didn't do drugs won't.

And that isn't racism?????

@ Frog #23
Hear Hear.

Very well said.

Will inadvertantly said (reply #3) what most people seem to agree with, when it comes to judicial decisions they agree with that have been forced on the rest of us by fiat:

"I do not even mind if it gets to the ballot box."

The implication being, of course, that he/they won't mind letting us vote as long as we vote the way he/they tells us we should...

/sarcasm on

Perhaps I'm not showing proper gratitude for being allowed to vote the way I'm ordered to by the self-annointed & enlightened, because after all they must know what's best for me and mine at all times in all ways...

/sarcasm off

BTW could someone please explain this to me: Leftists disdain old, bald, white guys, both living and dead (especially the dead ones). Why is it, that when old, bald, living white guys impose laws from the bench the disdain suddenly evaporates and those same doddering fools suddenly become wise beyond their years?

Anyway, thanks, Frog; good post.

West Texan, there is a prescription ...
drug with THC, the ingredient in marijuana that causes the high. It's called Marinol. One of my sisters attempted to take it when she was going through chemo treatments for breast cancer. The problem is that chemo makes you nauteous and throw up anything you ingest. The marinol never had a chance to get into her system to create the desired affect, that is, eliminating the nausea.

Though illegal, she found the smoke form of marjuana to be the best way to get the THC into her system and give her the desired relief. I had two sisters going through breast cancer treatment at the same time. My eldest sister, a devout Christian, wouldn't break the law and suffered severly from her chemo treatments. My other sister, a Christian as well but more open to different treatments, didn't have nearly the traumatic experience because of her willingness to smoke marijuana.


This thread is a great illustration...
...of the reason the Founding Fathers were so wise in establishing the USA as a constitutional federal REPUBLIC and NOT a DEMOCRACY. Yes, we elect our leadership democratically, but if we as a nation were to set law and policy by popular choice, we'd be tossed like a rag doll to and fro with every whim of the latest "hot" cultural storm.

Libertarian thought would allow all people to be free to be idiots. Please think people! Do you REALLY believe that liberty means that we each live in a personal vacuum and that our behavior(s) do not impact our community? Rubbish.

Liberal thought would have us establish any number of laws governing idiotic behaviors, but then when it comes time to prosecute and punish lawbreakers, we just pat them on the head and say, "We no you didn't MEAN to break the law and that you really are a GOOD person. Here's some of the people's money to get some help; please oh please don't do this again." Insanity.

With a republic, we at least have a CHANCE at getting some adults in charge. May God persevere and help us today as He clearly has for over 200 years.

War on Drugs
I never smoked, snorted, or injected... it IS easy to say no, it isn't as easy to change "friends" but it can be done with a sad heart. It is better to have no "friends" than to sink into the cesspool of drug use, it isn't "kool" or smart.

There is no "war" on drugs, as we use the police, we should use the army, kill the dealers and distributors and leave their bodies to dry in the sun for a few days. The scum student Dr. Adams speaks of, has learned there are NO consequences to his actions other than a one semester lay out and a few weekends tied up with gummint employees.

Users need rehab services. IF there is a medical use for MJ, then I'd imagine there should be another means of use than "smoking". There was a time when narcotics and MJ weren't illegal, but socially unacceptable.

Really?
Seriously, does it matter as far as meeting the qualifications for receiving a degree? It certainly should have some impact on the student’s future career choices, but what does one do with a CJ degree anyways?

Why will this adversely affect the reputation of the CJ department?

AudiR10
You missed the part where FOWG stated that these drugs are actually very cheap to produce.

It is the drug underworld and the fact that the drugs are illegal which makes them so expensive. And we are probably spending far more in the "war on drugs" which your taxes are paying for, than it would cost to give prescription cocaine to those who wanted it.

FOWG
I agree with you completely.

Simply saying that "Cocaine destroys lives" and therefore it should be a crime, is a very thin argument. It (that argument) is being used by liberals to control everything that people do from how much and what they eat to how much toilet paper they use.

The principle is no different than it was with alcohol during prohibition. We did not pass the 21st amendment because someone suddenly decided that alcohol was safe. It was passed because the citizens finally realized the folly of government acting as everyone’s de facto parent.

Life is tough and we all have our vices. Leave people alone and let them do what they need to do to cope with life. And by the way, executing someone for a purely political act (which is what drug trafficking is, is reprehensible!) I suppose during prohibition Mr. Adams would have been okay with executing Moonshiners? It's no different.

People will always find a way to get what they want and need. Criminalizing drugs just creates a drug underworld that is the real cause of crime.

FOWG
My difficulty as always is with the people who tout *legalizing drugs and allowing addicts to buy them with a prescription* and who fail to answer the question *and what happens when their addiction outstrips their ability to pay?*

Are you suggesting that an $8,000 per day cocaine habit should perhaps be paid for by Blue Cross -- without, of course, allowing Blue Cross to raise premiums on the poor, poor, pitiful poor drug addicts or all the other Blue Cross subscribers who do NOT have $8,000 per day cocaine habits?

Or perhaps are you suggesting we give out Cocaine Stamps funded by, um, someone elses taxes?

It seems to me that the 800 lb. gorilla in the Legalize Drugs Maaaaan Living Room is the old Ayn Rand query AT WHOSE EXPENSE? and the answer is the chirping of crickets.

I wonder sometimes,
just how society is going to deal with a "herd" of folks addicted to these hard drugs driving their cars through school zones, on the freeways, and through our neighborhoods. We as a society have not even been able to deal effectively with the booze addicted drunk driver who kill at will our neighbors and friends. The Libs around us (that is two groups, Libertarians and Liberals) who want these drugs legalized are ill prepared to even suggest what we as a society will do with the thousands of useless people that will result from the proliferation of said drugs. Oh yes there will be many who will imbibe and keep their lives together and be productive members of society

Seems that we as a society would by now learned how to deal with the addict, but we haven’t. So lets legalize more mind altering substances to see if that helps.

Long Sentences For Users
While I am not in college, my position has always been long mandatory prison terms for drug USERS if you want to clean up the drug problems. Drug dealers aren't the ones commiting offenses against regular folks, drug users are. Drug dealers (unless they are users, too) don't break into people's homes to get money or possessions to sell for drugs, users do. Drug dealers don't have accidents on the job, users do. Drug dealers don't hold up convenience stores and shoot the clerk to get money for drugs, users do. Drug dealers don't steal mom's, dad's and grandma's prescription drugs, users do. Drug dealers don't steal your car, users do. Drug dealers don't kill innocent people while driving drugged, users do. The pimples on the butt of society are drug users. Would Macy's stay in business if it had no customers? Stop rehabbing the customers of Mike Adams' student and put the creeps that do business with him in prison for a long time and watch the quality of life in the US go up for the rest of us. Some jerk dealer getting his criminal justice degree is not the thorn in my side but his customers may someday be that thorn. And for crying out loud, legalizing drugs may eliminate dealers but dealers aren't the blight on society. People want to legalize drugs so we have more creeps impacting regular folk's lives? How is having to go to the counter for drugs going to stop the jerks from committing all kinds of crimes to pay for them?

Future
The fact that the left leaning university system will confer a degree in any criminal justice or law enforcement isn't the BIGGEST; problem. Y'all just wait till somebody HIRES these felons. Make NO mistake The ACLU will probably hire'em. l It would be interesting to follow these idiots and see just WHO does hire them. Bethcha it will be a lefty socialistic bunch of fools.

In a nation of liberty, ...
why must I give up personal liberties because someone else thinks they will harm me? Why is it okay for government to use the power of legislation to promote certain behaviors above others?

I do not want anyone telling me what I can and cannot do based upon the premise that they are protecting me. Even protecting me from myself! The borders of my freedom end when they encroach upon another individual. This quasi "for the good of society" crap is just that, crap! It is a means of controlling people that can only be defined by the person or people who choose define it.

Let people live their lives as THEY see fit free of the encubmrances of the socail do-gooders. But let them also be responsible for their choices. Drink your life away? Fine, just don't get behind the wheel. Want to smoke dope or snort coke? Fine, but don't expect your employer to say you can keep your job. Want to marry someone of the same sex? Sure, but when you get an STD, don't expect government to spend my tax dollars tryinig to find a cure for a disease you are very likely to contract.

I don't have a problem with people having the liberty our Constitution affords. Just so long as they also take the responsibility as well.

Degrees
In my state, Washington, only the government or its licensees may sell intoxicating spirits. Tobacco products are also heavily taxed. And then there is that Devil himself: Gambling. Another State enterprise. And those wise men and women who claim to represent me in the capitol are quite willing to spend $40K+/yr-inmate to incarcerate drug addicts, but God forbid they might actually help an addict overcome his/her disability (isn't "Department of Corrections" a bit of an oxymoron?). Very curious.

FOWG and Savage99 have it right
We need to declare victory in the "War on Drugs" and quit. If we really want to spend money on the "drug problem" then we can spend it on rehab. Beyond that, if people persist in ruining their own lives, government attempts at interference won't make them change. We know that from decades of experience, hundreds (thousands?) of lives lost and billions of dollars wasted.

wHY nO iDENTIFICATION?
wHAT'S THE DEAL...Mr. Adams regularly identifies individuals by name, email and sometimes even their phone number. If this is all a matter of public record, why did he choose this time to keep the CONVICTED felons name a sectret?

Smoking gun
Monica said that cigar was lit but she
didn't inhail.

its the education system, stupid
Regardless of your thoughts on states rights and effective drug war tactics, the larger problem here is that the education system, from K through 16 is mired in feel good, immature, baby boomer self absorbtion, PC-laden, diversity-first, inneffective educational policies. The unexpected consequence of the drive in the 70s to protect and develop the self esteem of students, has led to a self-absorbed, me-first (and only) generation of educators who want only to feel good about themselves and don't believe in saying "no" to any student desires. And I work at a large metro university and see this every day.

Alcohol, tobacco and other drugs
The history of alcohol prohibition and repeal pretty much illustrates that as much misery is associiated with alcohol, legal use is better than making it illegal. It is certainly worth trying the same legalization on drugs. If it doesn't work, go back to illegal. As for tobacco, it persists as a legal killer because it makes money, because making it illegal would be unpopular and immpact the electibility of the lawmaker who supported it, and because its effects tend to be subtle, not rampant. Fortunately, tobacco use is more and more becoming a habit of the lower classes. It pretty much starts as a call for notice, for help, and as a symbol of rebellion.

Irrational, Ineffective, and Arbitrary
If you said "What are three words you would use to describe the war on drugs?" You are correct, and you control the board.

Prohibitionists are either stupid, or in denial. Not to mention hypocritical.

Prohibition drives up prices, and creates an enormous economic incentive for dealers. Not even the death penalty will stop the drug trade.

And do you really want to live in a country where the penalty for using unpopular drugs is death?

Small government means less powerful government, means more freedom and liberry for American citizens - as our founders intended. Drug laws are anti-American.

What part of that don't you get, Mike?

That's just your tax $ at work
Tell me again the importance of a college education? And how much does that cost???

mrbmrb makes some points. Unfortunately,

they're not a good ones!

1. Some colleges will admit anyone.

2. Some colleges will give a degree to anyone, regardless of whether they've actually learned anything or not.

3. Some people don't learn from their mistakes.

4. A college degree (even a Masters) does not mean that people can write beyond a 3rd grade level.

5. mrbmrb and his keyboard should probably not be drinking while posting... anything... in public.



(And if you thought mrbmrb's post above was entertaining, wait 'til you read his post on Burt Prelutsky's column!)

Sorry, you're all missing the point...


"University Awards Criminal Justice Degree to Cocaine Dealer."

All the debate (or whatever you want to call it) about drug use, and getting away with stealing cars, etc., etc. is another article.


Nailed it, Anne.
Wait!! "Just a few days before we

conferred a CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEGREE criminal justice on a CONFESSED COCAINE DEALER....."

Isn't anyone else reading this and saying, "What the h@ll is wrong with this picture???"...

...
This should boggle the mind of every reasonable and rational person who isn't in a coma!

I have believed for years, that all leftists ARE in a coma!

95% of Media, in a coma.
95% of Acadamia, in a coma.
95% of Politicians, in a coma.
I am going to guess here - more than half the population of this former Republic, in a coma!
The former Republic lasted 70-80 years, and after Pres. Lincoln, has been steadily, and continuously been being turned into a democracy.

i.e. Loudest mouth prevails, sanity is spat upon.

Are we doomed? Gosh, I hope not, but not looking very good.





Stop It Trog! You're killing me!
"Subject: Me Want Say One More Thing . . .
. . . me want you love me, yes, but me no want you love me like big kaleefornia peeple in black robe say man can love man.

Me not love u like dat. Me just want be friend with Will. (But Will not think me so smart, cuz me love God! Me cry so much!!!)"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Honestly, you got me laughing, bigtime!

"Strange Hole"

Killer humor!!

As for me, I not B will's fren. i B sory fer hinnnie.
A few posts above, I mentioned male rape, and hesitated for fear that Will would instantly "Arrive" (wink, wink) at that crucial juncture.





War on drugs
I ordinarily agree with Dr. Adams, but he's way off base here. He compares drug dealers to rapists. Drug dealers, unlike rapists, do not force their product on anybody. Dr. Adams speaks of lives destroyed by cocaine. True, but the choice to use cocaine is made by the user, not the dealer. I have worked in emergency rooms, and have seen lives destroyed by alcohol. I have seen people who were young and healthy a few minurtes ago die after being hit by a drunk driver. I have seen alcoholics die from blood loss when swollen veins rupture in the esophagus. Would Dr. Adams suggest that liquor store owners are responsible for these episodes? Would he suggest outlawing alcohol? It's been tried, and was just as big a failure as the War on Drugs. And, like the WOD, it enabled some very bad people to become very rich. And what about tobacco, which kills more people than all other drugs put together? Oops, I shouldn't mention that! Dr. Adams occasionally writes a column telling us of his favorite brands.

Wait!! "Just a few days before we

conferred a CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEGREE criminal justice on a CONFESSED COCAINE DEALER....."

Isn't anyone else reading this and saying, "What the h@ll is wrong with this picture???"

Just as the students at San Diego State last week who were busted for dealing, one or two about to get their BS in law enforcement, and one a MASTERS IN HOMELAND SECURITY... and the idiot who was about to get his Masters actually had the nerve (for lack of a better term!) to ask if this was going to impact his career!!!

This should boggle the mind of every reasonable and rational person who isn't in a coma!








so what fro gods sake
i stole a few cars when i was yopung, got caught with most of them and served my time. later inlife i made a living stealing anything i could get myn hands on from department stores, electronic stores, etc. got caught 6 ot 7 times and kept on doing it, in what i thought was sign of incipient paresis. a college granted me a degree.. then anothe one a masters. so what???? your column is a waste ot trees labor and paper. next time think about conservation and dont writ anything stupid again. well do the best you can.

FOWG
Interesting post. War on Drugs...

My wife and I have talked many times over the years about this same concept.

Legalize the user, and get them valid and useful help.

Sending someone to prizon for usage, does nothing to reduce the problem, and in fact creates more problems.

Prisons seem to be better than most schools for teaching you things. Things like new crime skills, brutality, same sex rape...


I would suggest that getting a take home prescription is not a good idea.

The prescription should only be administered one at a time, at the Clinic, under close supervision.

Otherwise, you would have thefts, more sales, and would have just created new "Dealers".

Think not? Try this...

"Honey, my car broke down, and I don't have enough money. Can I have some of your prescription to sell?"









Me Want Say One More Thing . . .
. . . me want you love me, yes, but me no want you love me like big kaleefornia peeple in black robe say man can love man.

Me not love u like dat. Me just want be friend with Will. (But Will not think me so smart, cuz me love God! Me cry so much!!!)

Put long peepee thing in strange hole "good," they say, but me not like. Me need learn be "rational," like Will.

But don't want you have wrong understand about how me love you.

Not that there am anything wrong wid dat!

(Me like watch old "Seinfeld," and "Will and Grace"--that how me learn what good and what not good. Me think you learn same way.)

Like George on Seinfeld say, "it not you, it ME!"

Kalieforneea say so! So must be true!

Now me wait four Luis to say crazy thing four make laugh. Silly, angry man. Not like put me long peepee thing in strange hole, but me not want hate anyone.

Me say, hope you marry nice man quick. Afteer November, ugly irrational people like me say you no can do no more. Time short. Move fast.


You freend,

Norman

To Will, the Arbiter of Rationality...
. . . who loves everyone, as long as they agree with him!

*****************
Will,

Me hurt. Me want you love ME, too!

Here big, big problem. Me love God. Jesus my Lord. Me love Him. Me want obey and follow Him. Me try hard, but fail sometime. When do, he forgive me. Him love me lot. He tell me so.

Holy Spirit open my heart to God. So me love Him, too.

So you think me stoopid ("supernaturally inclined"--Whatever THAT mean. Me not smart like you.)

Me sorry you not think me "rational" (whatever THAT mean, please see what me just write about dat--me not write good like u).

Cry many tears, cuz Will no like me. . .

Someday, me be tolerant and smart--like mighty Will.


Ooga booga,

Norman the Irrational Troglodyte.

Mike,
You say that states should have the "right" to pass laws "executing drug dealers", but the federal government tells me that my own great state of California does not even have the "right" to legalize medical marijuana, an idea our voters approved at the ballot box.

Oh look. You had to drag a "marxist feminist" into the conversation. Of course! That's so typically... Mike Adams. Radical feminists. Unrepentant jews. Militant homosexuals. As an evangelical x-tian, you have your Torah-inspired laundry list of preferred sinners.


By the way. My great state's Supreme Court has found that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional. Let me be the first to tell all of you yokels I TOLD YOU SO! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!!!!! Justice can prevail! And I dearly love my state. We have a judiciary that can take a stand & DO THE RIGHT THING. I do not even mind if it gets to the ballot box. The recent polling here suggests the populace is divided around 51-49%, or an even 50-50% on this issue (the 60% of Californians who voted to keep marriage between a man and a woman was recorded 8 years ago and times have certainly changed.)

I love you all. I believe you all, too, can properly come to your senses (the rational folks anyway), given a bit of time & soul-searching. (Remember, I said the RATIONAL among you - not the supernaturally inclined!).

Cheers everybody.

WOD II

If he goes to a drug store and gets a clean product with a consistant dosage for an affordable price, the pusher disappears and the number of young addicts plummets. The glamour goes out of it too if it legal and users are seen as losers, not hip lawbreakers.

What we are doing now leads to violence, corruption and costs the taxpayers plenty directly and indirectly.

We as a nation have to try something new.


War on drugs
I did in fact inhale. I've had limited experience with grass (I liked it and thought it preferable to booze on several levels) That is the extent of my experience with controled substances. I speak with all the authority of ignorance when the subject is cocaine or heroin or anything ele people choose to poison themselves with. A Libertarian view is that as a free citizn, a person should be allowed by law to ingest anything he wishes and I can see that point.

The govt. believes that the use of mind altering sbstances results in the breakdown of society and has an interest in supressing its use. That also makes sense.

What does not make sense to me is the current system where users are harassed and dealers are imprisoned, where customs officials and judges are corrupted by the vast amounts of money involved, where people ars mugged or burglarized for drug money, where the foreign policy of the nation is often warped in efforts to control the production and distribution of substances people want.

As I see it the driving force in the addiction cycle is the local pusher. It is he who offers free samples to young people to entice them to become addicted users and customers. As I see it, the only way to end the scourge of drug use is to eliminate the local pusher. (The subject of this column.)

If an addict could go to a clinic and declare himself as such which could be confirmed by testing and have a renewable prescription for the drug of his choice, I think that such an addict could then get his fix through legitimate pharmaceutical systems for next to nothing in cost. (This junk is cheap to produce, the expense is there because it is illegal.)

The addict will be offered free rehab at the issuing clinic.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.