Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, February 04, 2008
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
My Unsolicited Thoughts on N.C. State
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Recently, North Carolina State University celebrated the opening of its new Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (GLBT) Center. Located on the first floor of the Talley Student Center, it is supposed to focus on “educating” the university community and serving as a “support system” for people of different “sexual orientations” and “gender identities.” This is presumably because GLBT people (whom I refer to as Gilberts) are emotionally fragile and need psychological support and constant affirmation by straight liberals.

Dr. Jose Picart, NC State's vice provost for diversity and African-American affairs, recently admitted that diversity is not always “harmonious.” So, he – just like other supporters of the GLBTs - is trying to force something on the university that does not come naturally. I think that’s a pretty appropriate philosophy given that the gay rights movement really is about forcing things that are not natural.

Dr. Deb Luckadoo, director of NC State's Campus Activities unit, and Justine Hollingshead, director of the GLBT Center, will be in charge of scheduling activities for the new center. Among those activities will be a "brown bag" lunch on the last Thursday of each month. Among those topics will be the creation of “transgender awareness” as well as the creation of GLBT "allies" - those people who are more than just “tolerant” of Gilberts. Allies will be accepting of Gilberts, too.

Dr. Luckadoo says that the center also plans to invite speakers who focus on combating hate and discrimination. One such event will be the showing of "Journey to a Hate-Free Millennium," a nationally recognized documentary. The showing will be followed by a facilitated discussion. I plan to drive up to Raleigh for that discussion on Feb. 18 at 7 p.m.

When I arrive at NC State on the 18th of February, I will have some pointed questions for Dr. Luckadoo. Most of those questions will focus on NC State’s policies towards Christians wishing to share the Gospel on the public university campus.

Last semester, Dr. Luckadoo approached two pastors who were handing out Biblical literature on campus and asked them to stop. She said they needed a permit in order to engage in solicitation. One of the pastors pointed out that they were not “soliciting” anything. They were simply handing out something free of charge.

Luckadoo responded to the common-sense retort by saying that the pastors were “soliciting thoughts” and, therefore, would need to confine their activities to certain areas and to obtain a proper permit in advance. I would argue that the pastors were engaging in protected First Amendment religious expression which, when not otherwise disruptive, should be free from government intrusion, especially on a public university campus.

Dr. Luckadoo recently referred to GLBT Center programs as a “support system” that “benefits everybody” at NC State. But certainly she must be aware that many in the NC State community disapprove of the new GLBT Center. Indeed, numerous Wolfpack alums sent me information from the NC State website when the Center’s opening was announced. To my knowledge, all who did so were Christians who were understandably upset about the use of tax dollars to teach people to be “allies” who are more than just “tolerant” of Gilberts.

Besides managing the GLBT Center, Justine Hollingshead will conduct diversity training across campus. Perhaps at her next session, she could mention that the First Amendment right to the free exercise of religion predates the constitutional right to sodomy found in the … say, which Amendment was that based upon?

The fact that Justine Hollingshead founded the university's "Project SAFE" program - which has already trained more than 300 faculty, staff and students to be GLBT allies – shows something rather obvious: NC State does not need a Gilbert Center in order to teach the masses that the Old and New Testaments are both wrong about homosexuality.

Nor is there any evidence that Gilberts are being harassed in any significant way. But the same cannot be said about Christians wanting to share the Gospel at NC State. They are running into troubles that should be addressed if Justine Hollingshead was at all serious when she said "Creating a place that is a safe, non-judgmental environment for all people - including members of the GLBT community - is one of the university's priorities." I read that quote from the university website so I guess she must have been serious.

Many of my friends want to see the new GLBT center abolished. But I disagree. At NC State University, we should allow the gay community to have its own resource center. But, in exchange, we should demand that the administration rescind speech zone and permit policies that have been used disproportionately against Christians sharing the Gospel.

In a free and open marketplace of ideas, we can best show Wolfpack students the truth of the Christian message via its juxtaposition with the falsity of moral relativism.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Luis
3) Homosexuals are proselytizing children and flaunt their sexuality.
What you call proselytizing is merely stating ones side of the argument. I do not believe that there is anything wrong with homosexuality and will continue to voice my opinion. You disagree with my position and are equally free to say so. However, since you are unable to form a cohesive argument, you are trying to shot the opposition down. Furthermore, while I don’t like the flaunting of anything, the flaunting of homosexuality that you oppose is the direct result of the type of oppression you and like minded people have provided. Any time something is oppressed, the most radical or extreme element will break out and expose itself as openly as possible.

Finally, I do actually think you are insane. You may take that as personally as possible because it is personal, from me to you and only you. Therefore, when you respond to this particular point, it should be from you and only you to me. Your continued use of the plural is how I base my opinion. You not only fail to explain how you know “exactly” what millions think, you use the plural when discussing a personal point between just the two of us. And my my, that was very interesting about the phallus. Does the syrup come in different flavors? Of course, most of the lesbians I know want nothing to do with such things. As lesbians they don’t find men or their parts sexually attractive. Of course, your thinking the subject even had a point once again show how little you know about human sexuality homo or hetero.

Luis
No, you simply have not answered a single question, nor have you addressed the inconsistencies I have pointed out. Your entire argument, which you repeat instead of actually defending is based on 3 main points, each of which I have countered. To reiterate:

1) Homosexuality is contrary to God and nature or evolution.
The religious prohibition is valid for believers or members only. It does not apply to our nation as a whole based on the Constitution. Nature and evolution are blithely disregarded whenever it suits our desires, let alone needs. The dairy industry is a prime example.

2) Homosexuality spreads diseases, causes misery and shortens life spans.
The diseases inherent with homosexual behavior are identical to the diseases inherent with heterosexual behavior. As with all medical problems, science can and will address this issue. More importantly, behavioral statistics do not show causation. It has shown that promiscuous people tend to be depressed; but it shows equally that depressed people tend to be promiscuous. The same with life expectancies. Whites live longer than blacks. Women live longer than men. Right-handed people live longer than left-handed people. However true the statistics may be, they say nothing about causation. Finally, misery is a state of mind like all other emotions. In this case, you and your supposed millions are contributing to this misery by your actions.

Mike, we know what the millions...
Finally, I believe that you are insane. This is based upon your use of the plural. Why don’t you take time and actually answer my specific questions in the singular. It will take you too long to consult with millions.
_____________________________________________

...think about homosexuals.

But you can see that our answers to your inanity are prompt, so you can't complain about that. We do not need to consult with millions about your inanity, your desperation. We know exactly what decent, normal people, and that is most of us, excluding, of course, the libs/leftists/homosexuals/homosexualists, know about the perversions of homosexuality.

Mike, new d!ldo available
I see now you conceded that sex is for more than just reproduction and that homosexual contact results in pleasure. It looks like the irrefutable is starting to be refuted.
________________________________________________

Neither you nor anyone needs us to 'concede' that sex is for more than just reproduction, God, evolution, and common sense take care of that nicely. But any such concession by anyone, us, or God, or evolution, or common sense, DOES NOT APPLY to what homosexuals engage in, sometimes called "sex."

If we think about it much, and we don't, the 'pleasure' that you say we conceded, which we did not, is canceled out by the frustration of male homosexuals in knowing that the sperm went somewhere not intended by God or evolution, or common sense, and in the case of female homosexuals, there was no sperm (although we hear that some clever homosexual has invented a d!ldo which has a reservoir in which a syrup in stored and at a critical moment in their 'sex' a button is pushed which ejects the syrup to simulate ejaculation by the partner--is that not trying too hard? to imitate real sex?). That frustration is well documented, look it up, although we do not recommend any of the work by Saint Alfred Kinsey, because, besides being a confused trisexual/translesbian/quatrigender/quintirrotus himself, or something like that, he endorsed homosexual activity without reservation.

We should be insisting that you pay for our time in instructing you. But you are probably young and still gullible, innocent, impressionable, malleable, hoping for the best for the homosexuals that you don't care much about one way or the other--funny position for some so dedicated. The libs/lefties/homosexuals/homosexuals are depending on you and people like you for support, but it won't do any good.

Mike, analysis is not your...
Here’s a new one. If my use of the term insane is an insult that shows I have no argument, why is your use of “silly, inane lib/lefty babbling” not the same?
______________________________________________

...possession.

First, we are referring to your babbling, not to you. Your are another victim, along with the homosexuals, of the lib/lefty/homsexualist propaganda, the lib/lefty/homosexualist party line. You are passing on their nonsense. We are referring to your material, to your indoctrination.

And even though it would be simple to impute silliness, inanity to the passer on of sillin, inane babbling, we know that you can't help it, and to a certain degree do not blame you. Too large a part of the US generally is operating under similar nonsensical, lib/lefty ideas, but we are fixing that. We are not making this personal.

But you have called us insane. You have made it very personal. You are referring to the source.

We do not doubt that you cannot see the difference.

Mike, your comments are STUPID
MikeR writes: Saturday, February, 16, 2008 7:57 AM
Luis
Very interesting. Perhaps you should make it simple for me because I fail to see where you answered the nature/evolution question. Do you find the eating of cheese unnatural or contrary to evolution? Did you know that most of our dairy cows live in completely female herds and are artificially inseminated?
______________________________________________

We do not resort to the use of this word very often, but you need it: Your comments above are nothing but STUPID. You are desperate and apparently can't see it.

Luis
Very interesting. Perhaps you should make it simple for me because I fail to see where you answered the nature/evolution question. Do you find the eating of cheese unnatural or contrary to evolution? Did you know that most of our dairy cows live in completely female herds and are artificially inseminated?

Why does some of your reasons for wholesale condemnation apply only to homosexuals when the reason applies equally to some heterosexuals?
.
What is the reason for your use of the plural when speaking in the singular?

Here’s a new one. If my use of the term insane is an insult that shows I have no argument, why is your use of “silly, inane lib/lefty babbling” not the same?

How do you explain the inconsistencies that I specifically pointed to?

I see now you conceded that sex is for more than just reproduction and that homosexual contact results in pleasure. It looks like the irrefutable is starting to be refuted.

Finally, I believe that you are insane. This is based upon your use of the plural. Why don’t you take time and actually answer my specific questions in the singular. It will take you too long to consult with millions.

Mike, in a word...
...nothing favors homosexuality, nothing makes it look good, and we mean the studies and statistics on the health and living of homosexuals, God, evolution, common sense, the sterility. ALTHOUGH every single homosexual except one, matthew I think, says that they practice 'safe' 'sex,' no anal 'sex' for them, they live in nice, neat cottages with flowers in the windows and a white picket fence, or at least a nice three bedroom suburban in a respectable development, with Baptist neighbors who love them, all have respectable incomes, respectable jobs, all of them, but that is not what the studies say, and they attempt to defend their perverse way of life.

Mike, more on your babbling

No, you have never called us mean, vitriolic, vituperative, hateful, and we have never said that YOU did--we said that that is what the libs/lefties/homosexuals/homosexualists call us, but you have called us insane. Insults, that's all you have. You cannot refute homosexual sterility, homosexual perversions, the shortened homosexual life expectancy, the homosexual proselytizing of children, the homosexual public flaunting of perversions, so you resort to calling us insane.

No, married, normal couples are not restricted, by anything, to sex only when the female is ovulating so that the sex produces a conception, but, then, the male is not sticking his pen!s in her rectum like the homosexuals in their filthy 'sex.' The normal couple are copulating the way God, or evolution if you prefer, intended. Not to mention common sense, which is.

Pleasure is not all that God, or evolution if you prefer, intended that sex in normal people produce. If there is pleasure in homosexual 'sex' then that is all there is and as we indicated before, studies show that homosexuals are very frustrated by their 'sex' not producing children, to the point where there is research going on for doctor perverts to remove the sex organs of females who are brain dead and place them in male homosexuals--we haven't heard what the analog is in the case of female homosexuals, but you can bet there is someone crazy enough to do it. In the meantime the homosexuals will continue adopting and proselytizing. (By the way, look into the children who were adopted by homosexuals and who are now adults and see what unhappy lives they led.)