Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Fair Tax: America's Last Best Hope
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Shortly after 911 one of my conservative friends said that the country was going to hell in a hand basket. He declared that the conservative movement had officially lost its way in America and that the fall of the republic was near. I disagreed with him then. But I must admit that the current selection of Republican candidates has me more worried than I’ve ever been.

Despite the negative outlook, I think there is one last chance for America to regain its past glory and, perhaps, to turn back the tide of socialism that threatens our future prosperity. This last chance comes in the form of a single piece of legislation which, if passed, will cure almost all of what is ailing America. I know that seems like an extreme position but I think it can be argued persuasively.

If you are not convinced that the Fair Tax is the single greatest piece of legislation ever written, please take the time to list half a dozen things you hate about the current political climate in America. Then consider seriously the effect the Fair Tax would have upon that which you dislike about this country. I’ve done so in the space just below:

Jesse Jackson. Recently, I heard something really stupid coming from a black man. He said that the “3/5 of a person” racism of the 18th Century was still a reality in the 21st century. As evidence supporting his claim, he said that a black family makes about 3/5 as much as a white family makes today. I didn’t bother trying to challenge his statistics because I’m just so damned tired of these arguments about “institutional” racism.

The reason why there is black/white income disparity in America is because white people control all of the large corporations. But those large corporations were medium sized corporations before they were dubbed “large.” Before that, they were small businesses.

We’ll never solve this racial disparity issue until at least a quarter of a century after there is an explosion in black-owned small businesses. That cannot happen as long as a poor black man has to hire an attorney to set up his business (for tax purposes) and an accountant (to help him navigate the tax code) before he hires a single worker – one who is not employed for the sole purpose of dealing with tax issues too complicated for the average business owner to understand.

The Fair Tax will solve these problems by abolishing the IRS. Within ten years, I predict that the black/white income disparity will be cut in half. In 25 years, it will be virtually non-existent. When this happens, we will no longer have to listen to racial antagonists like Jesse Jackson. Some day, people like Jackson can go back to counseling adulterous presidents while themselves committing adultery.

Al Sharpton. I don’t like Al Sharpton. He once sodomized a white friend of mine and wrote “cracker” on his forehead after smearing him in fecal matter. Actually, that isn’t true. But I thought that telling outrageous lies about racial incidents that never occurred would land me a regular spot as a race relations expert on The O’Reilly Factor. But, in all seriousness, the reason we won’t have to listen to this national embarrassment in the aftermath of the fair tax is the same as above.

Local Government Waste. Just a few miles from my house, the local government has been over-seeing the expansion of 2.3 miles of road connecting Market Street with Oleander Drive. They have been working on this project for 42 months. If they were to complete the work today, that would come to an average 556 days per mile. Why does it take 556 days per mile to turn a two lane road into a four lane road?

During the last 42 months I have heard some local politicians talk about re-naming Market Street because it might be offensive to blacks (reminding them of the local slave market which happens to have been located near Market and Water Streets in downtown Wilmington). But what offends me is that it takes government contractors 42 months to extend 2.3 miles of road. The Fair Tax is the only thing that can help.

By constantly reminding people of government spending (23% on every purchase) the Fair Tax is a powerful psychological weapon in the war against government waste – whether local, state, or federal. As long as the IRS uses the withholding tax scheme, people will remain ignorant and apathetic with regard to government spending.

Global Warming. For the record, I am a staunch supporter of global warming. I prefer seeing women in bikinis as opposed to mini-skirts and snow boots. But I cannot applaud all of this senseless research on global warming. The Fair Tax will help us cut down on all forms of senseless government spending including, of course, excessive federal research grants. If we do not do something soon, we will soon see Volvos with “Stop Continental Drift” bumper stickers next to the ones saying “Stop Global Warming.”

Marxist Feminists. Marxists feminists are simply irritating. I know, because I work with these people. They are incapable of interacting with men – especially capitalist men – without allowing their sexism and their ideology to cloud their judgment. Sadly, one of these people has a good chance of becoming president. Marxist feminists will never again be taken seriously after the Fair Tax is enacted. This is because no brand of Marxism will ever again be taken seriously.

The ACLU. Ever get tired of hearing about prayer in schools and the intelligent design debate? Me too.

The ACLU has made a living off of litigating “separation of church and state” cases in our public schools. It has made a lot of conservatives ask what can be done to eliminate the ACLU from America. But I propose that we solve the problem by eliminating public education from America, which will indirectly eliminate the ACLU. There aren’t enough nativity scenes to keep these people in business without our failing public education system to help them get by.

With the aforementioned psychological leverage provided by the Fair Tax, we will no longer have to worry about the public dumping more money into the sinking ship that is know as public “education.” And once we have private education we will again be able to teach about the evils of socialism and government waste to children not under the supervision of unqualified educators drawing a paycheck from a government that is performing functions it was never meant to perform.

Aside from ending sentences with prepositions, there are few tasks this brilliant piece of legislation is not completely up to. If we can just find a president who is committed to the Fair Tax our best days may be yet to come.

Dr. Adams insists that you log on to Boortz.com and FairTax.org for more information. In his next column, he will explain what the Fair Tax can do for herpes, hemorrhoids, and male pattern baldness.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Don't waste your time supporting it.
Face it, there is no hope of passing the FairTax, so people should not bother to support it. Our rulers have deemed the FairTax to be an unwise course of action for us to take, and they always know what is best for us. It is never wise to impede the guidance of our shepherds.

The abolition of the IRS would translate into a tragic loss of power for our rulers, for they need tax deductions to serve as the carrot, while the IRS serves as the stick. Without such tools, our rulers cannot steer the people. Fortunately, our rulers realize this, so there is no chance that they will allow something like the FairTax to take hold. As such, it is a waste of time to continue talking about something that our rulers do not want. After all, they make the policies, not the citizens.

I hate the IRS but
this is just a silly article. Can't find a lot of economists that are suggesting racial economic equality will happen under fair tax in the next 10 years.

Hamiltonian Protection and Tariff ?
Why not make those who seemed determined to destroy our remaining industrial and manufacturing centers pay? It workked for over a century with the Alexander Hamilton and Mathew Caey principles in which America expanded and grew. The rise in prices would be offset by increase in revenue to the voracious leviathan government. Even Hillary would like that. It would also mean more employed Americans.Why should most favored nations be allowed to flood our markets and flood our unemployment lines with impunity? Why tax American citizens for the cost of our enormous government when there is a steady source of revenue on the docks? WE may have to pay more at Wall Mart , but we would have more money in our paychecks to cover that. Free trade, like socialism is a nice sounding illusion with dire consequences. Mike Guy

"Fair tax" is a crass name
It actually describes nothing about the system. Steve Forbes' "flat tax" is self-explanatory, as well as FAIR!

Not that simple
Mike lives in a bit of a dream world here but there is nothing wrong with a little dream most of us share. The issue is that there is a lot more involved in the issues Mike brings up than what the fair tax can impact.

I do believe people will become more aware of taxes with the fair tax but some of us do not mind the tax as we take out a lot more than we put in.

A lot of Marxist that I know would love to give all their money to the Govt in return for all their needs being taken care of. Be it health care, house, food, etc.

Not everyone is so hard core but many Americans today want the best "deal" possible and there is no better deal than the government taking our money at the point of a gun to give it to somebody else. If I am a low income person then I can sit on my butt and be taken care of, who cares if I only make 30,000 a year if I am getting 80,000 worth of services... even if those services lower the standard of living for us all.

The fair tax might be a start but I am still not sold on it. We also need school choice and to cut the size of our govt by at least 90%.

The truth of the matter is most of what our government does is illegal. If somehow we could enforce the laws then we would never fear a Hitlary Presidency as there would be NOTHING she can really do to hurt us the way she wants. We the citizens of this country are protected from her Marxist policys and those of our party as well which puts us on the slippery slop to communism and slavery.

I really need to check out that book;
while I've heard there may be some sleight of hand involved in the promotion of the FairTax proposal (most troubling- if true- is the hiding of the tax in the retail price instead of the tax being added at the end of the transaction), it almost certainly MUST be better than the current system.

That being said, Dr. Adams may be trying to make a little too much soup from one potato.

Fair Tax close to perfect
Two problems with Fair Tax.

1) Make it per capita instead of family size. Easier to administer and no marriage penalty.

2) Must be in place of income tax. Must include dismantling of IRS.

Good things about Fair Tax.

1) Taxes consumption not income. If people consume less they save more, lowing interest rates.

2) Encourages recycling and repairing rather than replacing.

3) People will see the real cost of government which will lead to smaller government. Add local & state taxes to the 23% plus the 8% we currently pay and it quickly approaches 50%. We don't need that much government.

Ah, now there is my favorite dream
thanks for saying it jcdean:
"..cut the size of our govt by at least 90%."

I cannot understand how the fair tax could end the anti Christian tho Liberal Union...

Question for randomthoughts...
How is "must include dismantling of IRS" a problem? That's one of the best things about the Fair Tax proposal! Why would we need the IRS since the Fair Tax would be the sole source of income for the government?

Also, I don't understand your "marriage penalty" comment. Single people will still receive a rebate based on their basic living expenses. How would they be penalized? I have two children, so I would be rebated extra (compared to a single person) based on additional living expenses I incur supporting my kids.

There really is a silver bullet.
But most people are truly ignorant of it. The FairTax is a tax reform bill that is in both U.S. Senate and House (S. 1025 / H.R. 25), has existed and been perfected over more than a decade. The FairTax is said to be the most thoroughly researched legislative proposal in U.S. history and has more support and co-sponsors than all other tax bills combined. Even detractors say it would grow our economy 10% in the first year alone. It would eliminate and replace the entire current tax code. Folks will take home 100% of their paycheck for the first time in many decades. It would fully fund Social Security, be easier to enforce (much smaller number of collection/enforcement points, fractional), save over $500,000,000,000 a year (yes, that's billions) in compliance costs, remove any reason to shelter money offshore and bring back the multiple trillions of dollars the U.S.' wealthiest have stashed away offshore back home into our economy, increase the tax base drawing in the current U.S. underground economy estimated also in the Trillions of dollars, etc., etc.

Bullet pt 2
The Fairtax is the biggest threat to the power and structure of our Federal political machine (not government, mind you). It would eliminate Congress' ability to control and manipulate through taxation. The Fairtax would eliminate all the political federal tax favors legislated since the creation of the income tax system. It would eliminate all the tax loopholes created for our politicians' campaign donors that they worked so hard for, and the ability to create any more. It would eliminate the whole K Street tax-favor-for-campaign-contribution corruption machine. It would level the political playing field. The only legitimate reasons I can find that anyone could have for not wanting the Fairtax is 1) having a vested interest in the perpetuation of some form of our current system or 2) not really understanding it (or being deceived about it).

Stop and think about that: it would eliminate all the tax code and loopholes written by our politicians for their campaign contributors and special interests, OVER DECADES, would seriously curtail our legislators' ability to tax, and would utterly evaporate the K Street tax-based lobby machine and its inherent corruption. Now why is it that it gets so little press and so few really know about the FairTax proposal?

I highly recommend reading a very thorough yet neutral piece on it – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairTax

That Was My Idea
"We will soon see Volvos with 'Stop Continental Drift' bumper stickers."

Hey! I've been pushing the concept of plate tectonics as the next global cause for weeks and weeks. That's MY idea!

I am the president and chair of Global Tectonics Prevention and if you will send me $1 for every centimeter of ground movement that you have ever heard of, I will raise the consciousness of plate tectonics everywhere! Together we can prevent ignorance from hindering people's knowledge of plate tectonics!

Our motto: Canada!!! Get out of the waaaaaayy!

The FairTax is too simple
I have just finnished taking to tax courses for my accounting degree. I HATE the current tax system. However, I have read the FairTax book and the acctuall legislation itself. It is too simple and incomplete to satisfy our nations demands.

While the current tax structure is insanely complex, and even stupid at times, the FairTax takes the opposite extreme, and is too simple.

The nation needs to take some steps before it could possibly insitute a FairTax without causing the economy and government to colapse. Mitt Romney's tax proposals accomplish several of those steps. If we start to eliminate, reduce and simplify some of the taxes now we will be better situated to handle the chaos that would occur while changing the tax structure. Also we need to institute Mitt's spending cuts, and caps, because the FairTax does nothing to address spending, and in fact claims to be revenue neutral, so that Congress could continue to spend and tax just as much.

Also the 16th Ammendment needs to be repealed. Finnally the FairTax legislation needs to be rewritten to fill in the gaps it currently has. For example, social security and medicare would continue to be paid for by the FairTax, instead of withholding, yet nowhere does the Legislation describe the ammount or percentage of revenue that will be allocated to those programs. The FairTax claims that it could save social security by providing even more revenue for it, however is doesn't stipulate that any of the revenue actually be reserved for them.


Social Seucurity Solved (or NOT)
Many corporations have gotten into hot water because they missused funds that were allocated for employee pensions. With the current social security program the government is essentially doing the same thing with funds allocated to social security, but under the FairTax there wouldn't even be a fund set aside. I would not trust my employer to pay for my retirement, if they didn't keep a fund separate from the general fund for that purpose. The moment I see my employer using pension funds to cover business expenses, I know I need to start maxing out my 401K match, my IRA's, and probably need to start an annuity or other personal investment vehicle to pay for my retirement.

Fair Tax is NOT fair
Mike I have to disagree with you on this one. There are a lot of people touting the “Fair Tax” as an answer to all of the evils under the sun. Just listing a bunch of stuff and describing how and why these things are bad does not make the Fair Tax a good thing. Neither does naming it “Fair” make it a good thing. It is neither fair nor good as I have previously posted after looking at some impacts that it has and some of the assumptions made by it’s proponents.

First let’s look at some of the assumptions made by it’s proponents that make it “fair” for all.

- 22% price reduction on all good sold because the “built-in” taxes on goods will be removed. This is the major item that is used to offset the higher rate that most people will pay. This depends on business voluntarily reducing prices in anticipation of an end of year cost reduction. This will not happen in the short term and if it happens at all it will be over several years as competition works it’s way into the system. Meanwhile you will be paying the higher “fair tax”. I view this as a bird in the bush and that it should not be counted.
- 8% pay increase to workers from removal of the SS tax on employers that is paid for employees. The Fair Tax assumes that the businesses will give this money to the employees. This is another bird in the bush that is likely not to be seen. Businesses view this as an expense and just eliminating it does not assure they will give it to the employees. In any case, if you are retired this has no impact on you at all.

cont...


pt 2
- The pre-bate will offset necessities in spending. This pre-bate is calculated based on the federal poverty level and would currently be app $3200.00 per year. For most people this pre-bate will not come close to covering every day expenses. I spend more than double this every year on groceries alone.
- The government will pick up a huge amount of taxes as the so-called underground economy is taxed. I view this as another bird in the bush. Shifting the taxes from an income-based system to a sales tax based system does not guarantee that all the tax scofflaws will all of a sudden be brought into the system. There are probably just as many ways to cheat the system on sales tax as there are on income tax. The sales tax cheats are just not as prevalent now because the rates have been relatively low.
- The 16th amendment will be repealed and make it not possible for the government to use both taxes. LOL, another bird.

Now lets look at the things that are bad that effect the average person.

- This program is really bad for retired people or others who have a lot of savings that they have paid taxes on and are now using those savings. The tax rate is 23% on all purchases. Most retired tax payers are in the 15% bracket so they would experience a tax increase here.

cont..

pt 3
- The program taxes ALL purchases of goods and services. This includes medical costs, whether you pay for it or insurance pays for it. This is a major hit. If you have a heart attack, get rushed to the hospital, stabilized, and then a stent put in the total costs are going to run in the neighborhood of $100,000. You will be liable for $23,000.00 in sales tax on this. In addition, after you go home and start sucking down all those meds at a rate of $300 or $400 per month you will be paying a 23% tax on these also. This is a MAJOR hit and problem with the fair tax system. If this tax system had been in lace last year I would have had to declare bankruptcy or die.
This is a few of the bad things that come to mind and, to me, make the fair tax system a loser.

Spend, borrow, and spend
Mike,
Com'on give me a break. Reducing income flow to the government coffers will not slow down their spending!

Have you heard of the deficit? How did the deficit come into existence? Government can't get enough to throw away now so they borrow and throw it away.

What would change?

I would like to see...
...some more detail about this "monthly dividend" that is supposed to be sent to every household by the Federal government.Can the Federal government even find every household in the United States? How much for every household?Based on what? Would we have to depend on the Post Office getting every check to the right person?

After all,the price of everything we buy will shoot up almost overnight.The resultant bad publicity for elected officials will be overwhelming.If this monthly stipend is supposed to go every man,woman,and child each month,what happens when parents or guardians drink or gamble their stipend away and children go hungry?

I know,the "devil is in the details",and the fair tax people probably have answers for this problem,but I have not seen any answers.We have some districs where many,if not most,of the people don't pay income taxes,such as Rangel's district in Harlem.

What the people will call "the cost of living" will take a very large jump,all at once,and the demagogues among the politicians will have a field day.

I need more details.

Fair Tax, Flat Tax, Value Added Tax, or
the present day IRS run extortion system, well none of it matters...

Until we has a country drop ALL the socialist entitlement programs NO tax plan will work...

Vic - prebate covers tax
Vic,

In pt 2 you are complaining that the prebate won't cover the cost of your groceries. The Fair Tax doesn't claim to be some Marxist wonderland. The prebate is only covering the amount of taxes that would have been paid on the base necessities.

A little 7th grade math (but only if you didn't go to public school) shows that at a rate of 23%, you would have to spend $13,913.04 on base necessities to have paid the $3,200 in taxes.

If you are spending almost $14,000 a year on basic food then all I can say is, "Bon appetit!"

Nam65-66
The details on the pre-bate are included in my post, pt. 2. That is currently proposed at 3200 per yr in which they would mail you 1/12th of that each month.

To Hankreardon:

Where in my post did I say that the unFair Tax is a marxist ideal or should be? Why don't you learn how to read before you go into your so-called 7th grade math. You also need to read the book as I have. The supoosed intent of the prebate was to offset the cost of necessities in the working poor. If this prebate doesn't cover the cost of groceries for me in a two person family, it sure as h*ll isn't going to cover what the working poor get from the current system through rebates.

My point is that for everyone except the VERY wealthy, this is a tax INCREASE.

FairTax..
Some get the FairTax, and some won't. Some can learn, and some just never will. I've tried to explain it, get people to read the book, etc. Nothing works for most people. They simply will not accept anything as straightforward as a system that relies on on a consumption tax. Politicians will do anything, underhanded or not, to avoid discussing the FairTax as presented, but we must succeed if our system of government is to survive.

In re: Stop Contintntal Drift
"Free the Indianapolis 500!"

Vic - more on Fair Tax
Vic,

I don't agree with your other comments in pt 1 and pt 3.

In pt 1, you're saying that you think transition to the fair tax will be difficult so let's not do it.

First, your assumption that retail prices will not adjust for "years" is just ridiculous. Retail markets are very, very competitive. Most big chain stores (which is most of the retail market) have standing offers where they will match competitors prices automatically. Consumers are aware of this and ask for it when there is a price difference. So all it takes is for one retailer in a market to lower prices, and all others will automatically follow. Do you seriously think some company like WalMart won't lower prices and drive all other retailers to follow? Of course they will.

Second, your assumption that employers will not pass on the 8% they are paying to their employees is equally wrong. I have a company and when we hire a new employee we consider the 8% in what we pay them. Any company that doesn't probably isn't in business any more. There will be a lot of press that people should expect an 8% raise because of this elimination of the SS. If an employee doesn't get the 8%, they will know their company is trying to take something from them. This is not a good position for the employer, because they will have justifiably disgruntled employees and will face poor morale and may have people leaving. It wouldn't make business sense for most companies.

Your pt. 3 just conveniently ignores that these taxes are already in medical costs (as well as everything else). The Fair Tax is basically tax neutral on current prices. If you don't understand that, you should probably read a little more about the Fair Tax.

Vic
So, you think that the Fair Tax is unfair because it doesn't cover the cost of food for a family of two? And you don't think that sounds Marxist?

Sure smells like a little bit of the old "to each according to their needs".

Vic and Nam65-66
Have you read the book? Have you read the legislation itself? Have you visited fairtax.org?

The answers are there. The idea that the Fair Tax will unfairly hit the elderly or the poor is certainly addressed. If you think that because you're only in the 15% bracket for your federal return you're ignoring the huge amount of taxes already embedded in the price of everything you buy.

And yes, businesses will drop their prices once they no longer have to build those costs into their pricing structure. Face it. Business don't pay taxes, they simply server as collectors for the government and much of what they collect is hidden (embedded) because of the way our "saintly" federal government manages the current tax code.

By the way, Merry Christmas and Happy Hannukah to all!

Vic, you're not listening.
Nam65-66 points out that the prebate covers the TAXES paid on necessities. It's not another govt giveaway that covers all your expenses.

Your post (and all of the other negative ones) demonstrates that you have not read and digested the book and so haven't learned the details of exactly how the FairTax works. I urge you and all the others to do so and then come back and comment with the benefit of knowledge.

You say, "If this prebate doesn't cover the cost of groceries for me in a two person family, it sure as h*ll isn't going to cover what the working poor get from the current system through rebates." Where in the book (you claim to have read) does it say that the FairTax is a substitute for whatever programs may be covering those things at present?

Fair Tax
My objection to the "Fair Tax" is based on what I saw while working for the army in Korea in the late 1980's. Wealthy families,such as the Kennedys would arrive in country on private jets while those with clout, generals and colonels, would come at govenment expense to "view the trooops" or examine programs. Their first stop after getting off their airplanes always seemed to be the shopping centers where tailors turned out all wool suits for ninety dollars - as opposed to the then two or three hundred dollars (or more) in the States. Ordinary working people bought in the country. I recall deciding a shirt I liked was "too expensive" at $3.50 and seeing the same shirt on sale in Walmart after I arrived home for $20.

The wealthy and powerful will avoid the "fair tax" by shopping in the poorer nations, as many already do. Working people will pay the tax. Bill D.

More Tongue in Cheek
One of the things I like about Adams is that he isn't afraid to think outside the box. In that vein, we should also consider that the FairTax will allow used guns to be bought without taxes of any kind, and new ones will be purchased from a paycheck received with no taxes withheld.

On the downside, the FairTax, by increasing the attractiveness of the US as a manufacturing and business center, may increase immigration to the point where white males become a minority. Or maybe that would be a good thing since, at that point, we'd be able to use EEOC regulations to demand promotions and better pay.

Other flights of fancy to follow.

Thank you, Dr. Adams
Enactment of the FairTax will not reduce government spending, and it is not designed to do that. It is by statute designed to be revenue neutral. Once passed, we can all start working to eliminate federal spending on the 65-70% of programs which are unconstitutional

The FairTax as I see it will also not cause the Revs Jackson and Sharpton to go away. The bill is perfect, but it's not THAT perfect.

The FairTax will be the greatest transfer of power from inside the beltway back to the people since the Founding Fathers concluded that our rights were unalienable, i.e., from God, not from a king, not from government. Amen, Mike.

In response to Bill
The fact that some, particularly the wealthy, may be able to use foreign markets to avoid paying some taxes, just like they do now, shouldn't blind us to the fact that the FairTax will be a much more efficient method of extracting "their fair share" then the current income tax system. Currently, the very rich receive more then 50% of the wealth from non-taxable sources. As a result, they pay no taxes at all on this "income".

Under the FairTax, we don't worry about the source of the wealth, but, instead, focus on taxing their consumption. And while the super rich may hop a plane to Europe to buy a new BMW, as soon as it enters the US, it would be subject to taxation as a new purchase.

So the FairTax may actually be a better mechanism for dealing with the super rich tax avoiders.

But, leaving that aside, even if the super rich are able to avoid paying any taxes at all, the benefits that would accrue to the low and middle income brackets have to be recognized, and we need to avoid "cutting off our nose to spit our face". Let's focus on what the FairTax offers everybody, and not worry that some may take advantage of the system.

To all proponents
Yes, I have read the book. pp 83-85 cover replacing the EIC credit with the prebate allowing a family of four a spending "allowance" of 26,000 for "necesities. The entire idea of the pre-bate was supposed to be so that it would silence the voice of the socialists who will scream at a tax increase on the poor.

As for the bird in the bush promises of wage increases and price cuts I have a bridge in NYC for sale as well as a condo in Florida, all ya'll contact me via GunnyG (he has my E-Mail address) and I'll arrange a fire sale for you.

I would prefer a flat tax of 10% with no exceptions or deductions. That would be fair.

If this proposal actually had a chance of making it through I would be worried. But it doesn't so I'm not.

The Naysayers Are Right
Let's leave the current tax system as it is. It's perfect.

Dr. Adams
I almost had an orgasm when you said what you did about the fair tax. It started me thinking and I wonder if the fair tax would keep local governments from hitting us with any extra tax like they do now? For example, the local government here was adding a 1 cent “restaurant” tax to pay for the “Hoosier dome” and it seems they will have our children paying all their lives for it! NOW “tax man” Mitch Daniels (yes the one who worked for bush) helped our not so esteemed mayor raise that another 3 cents to pay for a new Indianapolis Colts stadium. The only place this benefits is downtown, not the whole city. Would this fair tax stop UNFAIR tax such as this? I only ask because I have not read the book, and would like to know if it would stop states from taxing the common people for playhouses for the rich. Anyone?

Free Ramos and Compean
If we can’t have HOM