Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, November 19, 2007
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Devolving Standards of Decency
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


And look where we have since gone in the name of “progress.” Less than twenty years later, the Supreme Court would say that these “evolving standards of decency” prevented Georgia from executing a man for the crime of rape (see Coker v. Georgia, 1977). The man had a sordid past that included murder, though not murder in the first degree.

And somewhere in between these two cases (beginning in 1965) the Court would imagine a new Right to Privacy. It would take less than a decade before the right to contraception would give birth to a right to abortion, which would remain intact long after the right to avoid pregnancy via the act of sodomy would become part of the constitution.

People very seldom take seriously the retort of one politician who was asked whether a woman impregnated by a rapist should be able to terminate the life of the baby. His suggestion that we should execute the rapist and not the baby was pithy but wholly unrealistic in a society that has so progressed and matured in the eyes of the Highest Court.

There may well be many progressive readers of this column who are satisfied with the status quo; namely, with the extension of rights to rapists and rape victims, but not to the products of rape.

Leaving only one of the three persons in the equation (rapist, victim, and baby) without rights could well be seen as a devolving standard of decency that marks the regress of a secular society. This conclusion is perhaps best avoided by assuming that the unborn are not fully human and, as such, cannot be fairly characterized as persons.

But, in order to avoid an eerie feeling of hypocrisy, “progressive” supporters of abortion rights must simultaneously assume that the convicted rapist is a person who has somehow managed to retain his full humanity and personhood in the wake of such an awful transgression.

Somehow I cannot muster the hubris to assert that the humanity of the fetus is surpassed by that of the convicted rapist. I thank God that evolution has not conspired to make me a part of such a mature and progressive society.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Let's have some statistics. . .
I'd like for Touj or another of our dear leftward friends to find some numbers here.

Let's start by finding the number of pregnancies occurring from rape, which can all be assumed to be "unwanted". Then compare this figure to the number of "unwanted" pregnancies occurring from consensual relationships. Somehow I think the ratio will be small.

But let's not stop there. Let's further pare down this number to only those instances in both situations where a failure to abort truly would kill the mother.

I highly doubt that the ratio will be large. I highly doubt that this is the greater in "greatest good of the greatest number".

What we would have, then, is a tremendously small number of children who "have" to die, compared to an immense number who could be given up for adoption and have the chance at a productive life. Why should this great majority have to die for a small percentage that actually "has" to? What kind of morality is that?

Yes, I am male. So what? I practise responsible birth control. I don't engage in behavior likely to cause unwanted pregnancies. I can guarantee that no young lady will ever have to go through that kind of emotional strain because of me.

Future Consequence
Where life comes from its not our place to take away. G-d knits us together like a spiderweb in our mothers womb. That baby feels pain,chokes jerks away,there is plenty of proof in todays technology.
My mom was pregnant with me 4-5 months she was involved in a car accident.My dad was drunk driving and an army vehicle was speeding back to base hit our car. My mom flew through the windshield rolled down a hill and hit a telephone pole. She said Psalm 23 then passed out. Everytime she jerked in pain she could feel me curl up in pain inside her. She trusted in G-d to keep me safe she carried me full term.Very strong woman of faith. Life wasn't easy especially with an alchoholic dad but G-d had a purpose for my moms and my life.
I read an account of dream and vision this pastor saw in hell. One thing he saw was women carrying around umbilical cords with fetus shapes dragging behind them. A choice to murder is not a choice, its a future consequence unless repentance comes you will have to face before your creator.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.