Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
It could never happen in America
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Karlo Kraljev (karlo.kraljev@email.t-com.hr) of the European Human Rights Panel is spitting mad. And it’s not because his spell-checker is still broken. It’s because he thought “My Apology to the European Human Rights Panel” was a satire. He claims that the article was satire because it claims that another article (“How to Bomb a Gay Bath House”) was satire, which is a claim he still refuses to accept.

I don’t know how Karlo Kraljev manages to come off like a victim of anti-gay oppression. After all, the European Parliament appears to have named him Secretary of Satire for the entire continent. And, in the following note, he informs me that I’m about to be banned from Europe altogether:

Mr. Adams we have informed the European Parliament of your activities, and we will ask the Commission to prohibit you from entering the European Union on the grouds [sic] that you are spreading hate, and calling for genocidal extermination of human beings only because of their sexuality. Not long ago our group has successfully fought for the same sanctions to be applied on the Jordanian radical cleric who wanted to murder Americans. We value all human life the same, you do not, and that is why you are a Fascist. You are right that Europe is socialist, and the people of Europe have stong [sic] influence over their government, this is why we assure you – this process (after two years) will end positively. Sicerely [sic];

European Human Rights Panel

When I first read this letter, it was hard to get over the fact that I would have to spend the summer at Wrightsville Beach watching American girls in bikinis instead of going to Europe to watch French women grow the hair under their armpits. But then a soothing thought entered my mind:

It is great to live in a country that would never grant to any government or government- sponsored entity the right to a) determine what is or is not satire, and to b) impose punishments upon speech it does not understand.

But that soothing thought was short-lived because I made a crucial mistake: I read the student newspaper published by the University of Rhode Island. According to the newspaper, the University of Rhode Island Student Senate denied the appeal of the College Republicans who had been punished for running a controversial “White Heterosexual American Male” scholarship advertisement. The ad was obviously satire because the scholarship has never actually been granted to anyone. In other words, like a gay unicorn, it does not really exist.

College Republican Chairman Ryan Bilodeau found himself in the rather Orwellian position of debating whether the "White Heterosexual American Male" scholarship violated senate rules prohibiting discrimination. In other words, here in America, he had to try to prove his innocence in the absence of any evidence of actual guilt.

If successful, perhaps Ryan could slowly explain to these college kids that satirical speech is protected by the United States Constitution, which cannot be trumped by the student handbook. This is more evidence that students need to spend more time in high school learning about the constitution and less time putting condoms on bananas.

Matt Yates, the student in charge of handing out the punishments, required that the College Republicans write a letter of apology to be printed in the student newspaper. The CRs were also sentenced to have all club activities approved by a student committee until February 2008.

The senate, with straight faces, actually debated whether the mock scholarship was a) protected free speech or b) trumped by the student by-laws. Then, Yates, showing all of the intellectual sophistication of a European gay rights activist, argued against its status as satire because the CRs never told him it was satire.

Yates stopped short of saying that all satire must come with a pre-approval label saying: WARNING! YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ SATIRE!

From there, the intellectual sophistication of the senate discussion reached new heights. They even discussed whether the CRs were guilty of “false advertising” for writing the satire.

But Yates stopped short of saying that Jonathan Swift should be exhumed and tried for false advertising. Referring to Swift, Yates said “He never really ate any American children! The lying bastard!” WARNING: THE PREVIOUS TWO LINES WERE ONLY SATIRE! (The previous warning was approved by the University of Rhode Island Student Body Senate Satire Committee, which may or may not actually exist).

Senator Jesse Whitsitt-Lynch pointed out that the First Amendment does not guarantee a right to commit fraud. Dr. Mike S. Adams responded by saying that a college education does not guarantee that you will not grow up to be a dumb-ass. But a hyphenated name virtually guarantees you will grow up to be a narrow- minded feminist.

Ryan Bilodeau was right when he suggested that the Senate really wanted to force the CRs to state that they are a) racist b) heterosexist c) ethnocentric and d) sexist. That is why the student representatives voted by a two-thirds majority to uphold the punishment originally handed out.

And, now, on the verge of being banned from Europe, I’m looking for a good place to take a vacation and write my third book called “Redneck Jihad.” It will be full of unidentified satire, so you can bet it won’t be written in Rhode Island.

Dr. Adams’ second book “Feminists Say the Darnedest Things” will be published on October 4th.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
I wonder . . .
. . . if the URI senate would recognize a satirical apology. I mean, if they stopped short of offering classes on proper wiping techniques post-BM and how to tie big boy shoes as penance, one would have to imagine that the CRs could get away with apologizing publicly that the URI senate doesn't collectively have two matching brain cells to rub together for warmth.

Well, it was just a matter of time
before the left came up with the idea of putting "idiot labels" on speech.

America's Youth Isn't Dead
I already e-mailed this article to Dr. Adams, but this seems an appropriate place to let other people hear the same message. Maybe, with our help, My school will "spend more time... learning about the constitution and less time putting condoms on bananas."

Hello Dr. Adams,



My name is Tom Geairn, I am in 11th grade and I’m from Chesterton High School. To be frank, My classmates and I are disillusioned with the current state of public education. As of now we are taking a stand. We refuse to be expected to blindly follow the misguided footsteps of the liberal media. We refuse to be force fed lies in the classroom. We refuse to have our voices silenced. So, we are started an activist group, a sector of the YAF. Having been refered to you by a debate coach and having read your articles on http://www.townhall.com, I and my classmates are asking for your support. Anything that you can do for us would be great. We would LOVE for you to come and speak at our school sometime. It would also be great if you could mention us in an article or something somewhere. We are out to destroy the image of America’s youth as blind sheep. I think that this vision is in line with yours. Please help us shape the future of America! I hope to hear from you soon!



Sincerely,

Tom Geairn III

The Shining European Path
Whoa!

I just realize my cultural revolution is well advanced in the European Union. The European Parliament exercises with revolutionary prudence and solicited dedication the three principles of Maoism!

The gang of five would be proud!

You don't say?
Banned from Europe, where do I sign up? I'll never spend a tourist dollar there.

Important Question for URI
If male alumni of URI can be called URIs, then can female alumni of URI be called URINEs?

Wouldn't URIs and URINES like everyone to have attended URI? Then we'd be a URI-nation!

Those European Human Rights Panelists don't read these comments do they? If I shortened their names up to EHRPs they wouldn't think I burped at them, would they?

(You see, URI sounds like Yuri - that's a name - get it? See, the joke wouldn't work if you didn't know that Yuri is a name. But see, now I've told you about the name so even if you didn't get it before, you have it now. You can laugh. Unless you're a URINE, you might not like that, but you've gotta be able to laugh at yourself, right? Don't ask the European Human Rights Panelists about that, though. They might not want to do that. Laugh, that is...at themselves.)


Let them wait
The Ironic thing is that when the Islamofacist control all of Europe, the homosexuals will really learn what discrimination truly means.

Anybody ever wonder how it came to be that Germany basically leads the EU? and that the EU is composed of all the countries that Germany invaded in World War II?

And the old becomes new again.

Another Important Question
It occurs to me that John Kerry had a dust up about a joke that was insulting to military men and women.

Should John Kerry have warned everyone that his remarks were going to be a joke? Should he have said whom the joke was aimed at?

What if he didn't aim very well and the joke misfired - insulting the military instead of the president? Would his prior acknowledgement of what he was trying to say absolve him of being stupid?

The way it ended up happening, John Kerry simply looked like he was trying to cover up a thoughtless insult...

I guess with or without speech labels, John Kerry would end up roughly about the same.

Just wondering...

(Would we be cited for not labeling our speech? Would there be a fine? Is this happening only in Europe?)

(Ow. My brain is hurting again...)

Yuri
Unfortunately for PriceyInTheOC "Yuri" is a Japanese girls name, "Yugi" would be a guys name.

On the topic of "satire", if liberals understood satire they wouldn't be serious about their political beliefs.

Mike Adams
Mr. Adams, you are too much. Keep up the good work.

Looks like I'll be heading to URI soon
Ryan Bilodeau is a personal friend of mine from the CRs and I imagine shortly I'll be going down to URI to aid him in whatever manner I can. I cannot believe URI's student Senate is such a socialist POS that they can't figure out either A: Satire or B: The First Amendment.

Heads will roll.

Alice: yes means no and no means yes
And I quote:

"We value all human life the same, you do not, and that is why you are a Fascist. You are right that Europe is socialist, and the people of Europe have stong [sic] influence over their government, this is why we assure you – this process (after two years) will end positively. Sicerely [sic];"

European Human Rights Panel

It's too bad Dr. Adams has had to suffer exposure European Union bureaucrats or young conservatives have to endure the actual fascism of multi-cultural propagating leftist university senators. Unfortunately, one has to actually be literate and have an education in order to understand Dr. Adams, or the US Constitution.

It's apparent that the these Europeans don't even know their own not to distantly past history. Germany was ruled by the National SOCIALISTS (NAZIS aka as fascists) who also terrorized the world and killed millions.

The Soviet Union (known as the Union of SOCIALIST republics) were also ruled by party organized fascistic communists aka socialists. They terrorized and killed their own population by the tens of millions.

In both cases, the citizen had absolutely no influence on the dictatorial regimes ruling both nations and about as much as the average European has on the 'enlightened' liberal/leftist bureaucrats ruling the European Union. And these EU apparatchiks practically boast of being socialist?

But the Europeans value all Human life the same? Is this why they have promoted abortion to a sacred right and freely exercise euthanasia for the critically sick, demented and aged in their second rate, overburdened utopian state run hospitals?

If lies like these can still be sold with such ease to the average European, it certainly explains why many of their welfare states are nearly in a state of collapse. Let me except Poland and the Czech Republic where they, and their leaders, still know and fully appreciate, what socialism and who socialists really are. (The Czech prez Havel just called the environmental movement the communist outpost in the Western World).

Calling Dr. Adams a fascist is akin to the pot calling the kettle black. I wouldn't worry about any American ever being banned from Europe - they've always needed us more than we ever needed them.

in the doorway
Yuri is also a Russian masculine name equated with the name "George". BTW, in Japanese it means "lily".

Geo

What a sterling example of Dr. Adams column you are!

Clearly, you don't understand satire any better than the "European Human Rights Panel".

Thanks for the entertainment!

EU, go ahead....
...and ban me and my well organized gang from having any presence over there. We're kinda easy to recognize. Our outfits are either blue, black, white, or khaki. Our 'rides' are a color that's referred to as 'haze gray'...and they're a bit bigger than your European models. That would especially apply to the latest of our large rides, which carries the name of someone you really detest because he resisted socialism. That ride is known as the USS RONALD REAGAN, and my gang would be the big blue team called the US NAVY.

Humour is dead
To be safe today in company under the age of 45, you should always stick to words of no more than four letters and one syllable, and should be aware that f*** and s*** can be altered easily to take the place of every single part of speech.

Also, "YOU SUCK!" is an eloquent argument, and "SUCK IT!" is a polite alternative to "F*** YOU" and either one will cover almost every eventuality.

If you are a college student, on no account should you quote anything that was written in a book containing words of more than two syllables, that was written by A Girl, or that goes for more than six pages without someone tearing off her clothes and having sex.

That way you will never learn anything, and you will come out of college with all the friends you met in AA and Weight Watchers Club and all the vocabulary you will need in your daily life from now on.

Please be warned, however, that the only literate secretaries in the world are over age 50 and the supply is dwindling. Therefore you may have a hard time finding anyone to protect you from your vocabulary when you finally get a desk of your own.

I'm not sure of my intinerary yet ...
but some European country will get some taxes from my airfare dollars. I'm sure we'll have a quick stop somewhere as we fly to Israel this summer. Do they have direct flights to Israel from NY? I don't know but I hope so!

Geo...
You missed the point entirely (big surprise, there).

The mere fact that anyone, with a government bureaucracy or an NGO would attempt to squelch a person's opinion simply because that opinion is unpopular is a real problem.

I recall, when I was in elementary school, we were shown a film to explain to us the First Amendment. This was in the 1970s, for perspective...

The film opened with a guy in his 20's or 30's walking up to the front door of a synagogue. He pulled on an arm band that was black with a familiar white circle and swastika. He then began to rail about how great Hitler was. The film then went into his trial where he was acquitted on the basis of his First Amendment right to basically be an a--h---!

Now, this was just on the cusp of the real disaster in public education. In my school, at this time, we said the Pledge of Allegiance every morning. We also sang "America" afterwards. We didn't trust the Russians, thought there might be an "atomic" war and, thankfully, were young enough that we didn't understand how there could be P.O.W.s because the United States wasn't at war. (We didn't understand Vietnam!)

Well, it's a crying shame that that film is probably not being shown in schools anymore, because the P.C. police have ruled that "hate" speech is illegal. (We'll shut that darn Constitution up soon enough!)

The only problem is that they very people who are denouncing hate speech are the ones defining it and spewing the most hateful vitriol into the "public discourse" while shutting everyone else up.

Whether or not the EUHRC is a real thing, an NGO, a government bureaucracy or a figment of Mike Adams' imagination isn't really important. Whether or not some, or all, of the bureaucrats in Europe know who Mike Adams is or not is irrelevent. The simple fact that people think that you can be barred, banned or jailed for what you think, say or write should scare the living bejeesus out of you. I know it scares me.

I can't understand
why Mike Adams would not want to see the enormous hair growth under the arms of European women. I understand they braid it now....

Wait
I'm really confused. Isn't the entire liberal ideology just satire? Are you telling me that people REALLY believe in income redistribution, racial discrimination in hiring and school admissions, stifling employment and our economy to protect the brown-spotted tree louse, etc, etc?

Foolish me...all this time I thought the liberals and dems were just bad, but struggling comedians. I'm really scared now!

Banned from Europe
That's rich. Banned from Europe eh? Oh the shame.

Since when did red-blooded Americans ever care what Europe thinks about us?

Europe is like a spoiled step-child. Bratty as hell when they want something, but perfectly willing to crawl to mommy and daddy, when they get into trouble.

Let the Islamo-nazis smack them around for awhile. Europe needs a lesson in order to remember what it is like to live under real Facism and dictatorship. Sharia law will ensure that they feel the whip again.

Then watch them cry and whine for the United States to pull their fannies out of the fire that they built for themselves....again.

Brats, they never learn. Maybe it's because too many of their leaders graduated from brain-dead institutions like URI? Or is it Yuri?

In any event, it all sounds rather USSR-like to me. Never did like those people.

Incidently Doc, I'm borrowing this line from you:

"Dr. Mike S. Adams responded by saying that a college education does not guarantee that you will not grow up to be a dumb-a$$[sic]. But a hyphenated name virtually guarantees you will grow up to be a narrow- minded feminist."

I don't care who you are....that's funny as hell!!





If it came to a fight ..
we'd be in dire straights. The police are highly politicized and if they don't shape up and lick the masters hand they can expect the treatment accorded the border patrol and others.
George or Bill or Hillary .... there is a great force of evil inexorably grinding down on the mass of humanity and most people are soul dead and don't care.
Europe will be an Islamic state in the near future and that is undoubtedly the very best thing that can happen to it. Pat Buchanan was right all along.

EU?
Europe?
Didn't some guy named van Gogh get the point from the Muslims about negative attitudes toward them?

Rhode Island?
Isn't that a place that's smaller than several cities in Texas and Georgia, with less people?
Too bad the senators on the school senate could not afford out of state tuition and go to UNC-W.

Geo
Your words are demeaning. You are spreading hate. In Europe, we value all life the same. You are not allowed to come to Europe anymore.

The value of life.
If all life forms have equal value in the EU, then it follows that he (the writer: Karlo Kraljev (karlo.kraljev@email.t-com.hr)) has exactly the same value as say, pond scum. Or am I missing something?

Constitutional rights are absolute?
The senate, with straight faces, actually debated whether the mock scholarship was a) protected free speech or b) trumped by the student by-laws.

I am curious as to what extent private organizations can modify constitutional rights. Professional sports organizations can prohibit possession of weapons in their venues, in conflict with the second amendment. Does URI, as a public institution, not have this privelige? I believe this to be the case. If not, could someone enlighten me as to how absolute constitutional rights are.

No "European Human Rights Panel"
All,
It appears that there is no "European Human Rights Panel" at all - it doesn't exist, at all, anywhere. And there's probably no "Karlo Kraljev" either. The email address is from one of those free non-verifiable email providers, similar to our MSN or Hotmail email providers. This is clearly a scam. Maybe one of Dr. Adams students is fooling with him. Or maybe Dr. Adams is fooling with us.

badger poker
Private organizations can and regularly do curtail "constitutional" rights. You could be legally fired for saying something deemed inappropriate but constitutionally protect. You can be fired for carrying a gun to work. The Bill of Rights limits what government can do to you, not your boss or your lodge leader or your professoriate.

But with that in mind, schools that receive public funding should not have such omnipotent power, nor should that power be entrusted to the inmates of that institution. Unfortunately, college administrators use intimidation to keep students from pursuing legal recourse when they screw them over with "disciplinary hearings."

At the same time, "sins" such as politically incorrect speech or satire are treated disproportionately stringent compared to physical or sexual assault. At W&M (read Walter Williams article about their cross scenario) they actually kicked a guy out of school for only a year after he drugged and raped a girl at a party. The school talked the girl out of pressing actual legal charges because it would make the school look bad. She got in trouble when she made a banner with the rapists name and displayed it when he was ready to re-enroll. That place is f*cked up, pardon mon francais.

http://www.splc.org/newsflash.asp?id=500

Not all Europe is socialist
I always wonder why so many of you despise Europe so much. Don't forget that in Europe there are more than 30 countries, each one different, some of them very good allies of the US. And in all countries there are leftist parties and conservative parties, people who love the US (like me) and people who dislike the US (but I think that it is strangely the same in the US, where there are a lot of people who dislike their own country)

By the way, the European Union or the European Parlament can't ban anyone from travelling into Europe. In Europe satire is also protected speech, etc.

Don't believe everything you read.

Kind Regards from Old Europe

Explanations
When you have to explain a joke to somebody, it's never funny to the person who needs an explanation. When you have to point out satire, the person who needs the explanation is needlessly and excessively uptight.

Reminds me of the line in "Ferris Beuller's Day Off" where Ferris comments on his principal's anal retentive ways, "I'm not saying he's uptight, but if he ate a piece of coal, he'd sh*t a diamond two weeks later."

Liberals, atheists, and Democrats label conservatives, Christians, and Republicans as mean and narrow-minded and intolerant, yet we're the good-natured ones laughing at ourselves (and others) and NOT going to pieces when things don't suit our fancy.

Sheesh, get a life, Europe.

The CR's Critical Mistake...
...was not to have called it an affirmative action program. As long as you slap that label on it, you can pretty much discriminate in any manner you please, student handbook, laws, and constitution be damned.

Let's Have a Contest Kids!
Perhaps thread posters can submit draft suggestions of an apology for the URI CRs to use. Here’s my entry.

Dear Colored Foreign Lesbians,

Assuming there are actually any of you on campus and may have read this advertisement [insert original offending ad here in its entirety] we are sorry you are ineligible to compete for our highly coveted scholarship. Please accept our heartfelt apology for this most unfortunate circumstance.

Sincerely,
URI College Republicans

Audir10
Your post about 50+ secretaries is a hoot. I work in a small law firm - ALL of the secretaries are 50+ and we are all quite literate. We joke among ourselves that, when we start retiring in a few years, the attorneys are going to be hurtin' cowboys/girls!

Don't believe it can't happen here
Townhall, which I thought was a place for free exchange of ideas, is removing posts expressing disapproval of amnesty for illegal aliens and the jailing of our law enforcement officers for trying to stop illegal aliens. Furthermore, any column in that vein usually draws a high number of comments and it is quickly withdrawn from the front page. Try to find Dr. Paul Kengor's "America's Berlin Wall?"

Vacation down under
Instead of Europe, try vacationing in Australia and New Zealand. Better beaches, rational people and they drink a lot of beer.

Sandman
Here's mine:

To the Student Body of the University of Rhode Island (SBURId),

The University of Rhode Island College Republicans (URICr) would hereby like to offer the following heartfelt apology to all SBURId’s. We apologize that our attempt at satire is apparently above the heads of those who would govern your education here. We apologize to all minorities here at URIne because you are apparently too soft in the heart to be able to function after said satirical advertisement. We also apologize to all minorities here at URIne because you are apparently too soft in the head to be able to recognize the said satirical advertisement as satire. We would further like to apologize because to all minorities here at URIne because you are apparently too soft in the head or heart to be here at URIne without the good gifts of those who would govern your education here.

Further, we would like to offer the following in way of farewell, please remember us:
Alas, poor URICr! I knew them, Matt Yates: a fellow
of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy: he hath
borne me on his back a thousand times; and now, how
abhorred in my imagination it is! my gorge rims at
it. Here hung those lips that I have kissed I know
not how oft. Where be your gibes now? your
gambols? your songs? your flashes of merriment,
that were wont to set the table on a roar? Not one
now, to mock your own grinning? quite chap-fallen?


Re: Let Them Wait

Shadowsbane writes:

> The Ironic thing is that when the Islamofacist control all
> of Europe, the homosexuals will really learn what discrim-
> ination truly means.

And maybe they'll learn to stop using the word "fascist"
indiscriminately against anyone they happen not to like,
much like the way boys in junior high school use the word
"faggot."


> Anybody ever wonder how it came to be that Germany basically
> leads the EU? and that the EU is composed of all the countries
> that Germany invaded in World War.

Yup. One could even say that Germany's return to European pre-
eminence was a real triumph of the will.


-CB-


Unanswered questions
To whom are the CRs being asked to apologize and for what? Are they being asked to apologize for discriminating against non-white foreign lesbians? If so, shouldn't such an apology follow the establishment of guilt for said discrimination first? Wouldn't there have to actually be a scholarship first before the CRs could be guilty of discriminating in the awarding of that scholarship?

Was there some kind of Kangaroo Court or administrative hearing in which the CRs were pronounced guilty of discrimination? What evidence, if any, other than the offending ad itself was presented at this hearing/trial? Was the running of the ad itself deemed to be prima facie evidence of guilt, thereby negating any need for due process and permitting the administration and student senate to skip straight to the sentencing?

Liberals - What a Humorless Lot
I am going out on a limb here, but I guess The Onion is not distributed on the URI campus, nor is there a URI Lampoon. Pity, but for students in need of a good comic read, might I suggest a decent alternative: Verbatim transcripts from the proceedings of the URI Student Senate.

Reality v. Satire
Is the claim of two letters from an apparently completely fictitious organization, the "European Human Rights Panel" a satire?

Because if that's a 100% satire, then Dr. Adams point about living in a country that "would never grant to any government or government- sponsored entity the right to ... determine what is or is not satire ...." doesn't really make sense, because the comparison he's making is to a fictitious situation. Am I missing something here?

The rest of the column (about the state school in RI) seems like a real story (but can't be verified) and better supports his idea about PC and satire, but it doesn't support his message about the Europeans at all. And these activities of undergraduates just seem too trivial to make much of a point about government-sponsored censorship in the USA.

I think this recent pair of Dr. Adams columns don't hold together that well

You missed the point entirely
What do you expect from euroPEONS?

There's been varied information about the legitimacy of the "panel", they claim they're important, some say it's real, private organization and others say it's completely fake.

The domain "email.t-com.hr" doesn't exist and it has no IP address, so you can't reply to it. Dr. Adams does link the address to windows live, but that means nothing. Draw from that what you want. I'm leaning toward it being fake, with Dr. Adams being behind the spoof but it still doesn't change my opinion of europe or worthless euroPEONS.

Re: Not all Europe is socialist

euroconservative writes:

> I always wonder why so many of you despise Europe so much.

It's because so many Europeans not only despise us, but have
such infuriatingly misguided and petty reasons for doing so.

What it boils down to is the liberals' resentment of the
overachiever. Anyone who's conspicuously stronger, better
off, or more successful than his peers arouses suspicion in
the liberal mind and must be hobbled, because they believe
that life is a zero-sum game and that therefore, one can
only advance at the expense of others.

America, being the only superpower, is an obvious target for
the hostility of such people. If we'd never invaded Iraq,
they'd have found something else to hate us for.


> Don't forget that in Europe there are more than 30
> countries, each one different, some of them very good
> allies of the US.

Your point is well taken. And according to what I've read,
many regular Europeans like America just fine. It's the
Left, particularly the elites in government, the media and
the universities, who are vocally anti-American.


> And in all countries there are leftist parties and
> conservative parties, people who love the US (like me)
> and people who dislike the US (but I think that it is
> strangely the same in the US, where there are a lot of
> people who dislike their own country).

American anti-Americanism is an interesting phenomenon.
Some claim that these people don't dislike America at
all, but merely dislike it in its present form and have
a more (to them) agreeable vision of what it should be.
Of course, that's just a disingenuous way of saying that
they hate America as it really is.

Thanks for speaking up and reminding us that not all
Europeans despise the U.S. It's unfortunate that the
ones who do are generally so much more vocal than the
others.



-CB-

freedom
The liberals are the ones that want to take our freedoms away from guns to speech. And notice how the liberal tv and print news distort reality. Orwell had it right except for the year.

PC versus satire was the point
Patriot,
The euro stuff is fake and the RI story is real. I'm dropping Dr Adams from my read list. It's just too wierd to run such elaborate spoofs, and have readers sort though them. Not for me.

CAUTION, a joke
I understand that about 10% of the U.S. population is very fond of underarm hair.

WRONG
"You can be fired for carrying a gun to work. The Bill of Rights limits what government can do to you, not your boss or your lodge leader or your professoriate."

No, there is nothing in the 2nd Amendment or the Constitution that says that the right to keep and bear is ONLY protected from gov't encroachment. The First Amendment refers to Congress, but the 2nd is an absolute.

Creighton Beryll
The misguided euroPEON anti-American obsession is well known, even among euroPEONS.

http://www.taemag.com/issues/articleID.17764/article_detail.asp

"Strangely, it is always America that is described as degenerate and "fascist," while it is solely in Europe that actual dictatorships and totalitarian regimes spring up."

"On the whole, American society is sweepingly condemned as practically the worst association of human beings in history. Fresh evidence can do nothing to dispel such views, which, filled with distortion as they are, reflect little on the true strengths and failures of American society. But they tell us a great deal about the psychological problems of those Europeans who proffer the criticisms."

"For European leftists and the majority of intellectuals--who were likely to adhere to communist ideas--anti-Americanism was rational. This crowd identified America with capitalism, and capitalism with evil. What was less rational was their wholesale swallowing of the most flagrant and stupid lies about American society and foreign policy, with a concomitant flight from accurate knowledge of the political systems that the U.S. was battling."

"Obsessed by their hatred, and floundering in illogicality, Europe's anti-American dupes completely forget that when the U.S. acts against terrorists in her own self-interest, she is also acting in the interest of Europeans, and in the interest of many other countries threatened, or already subverted, by terrorism."

"For skeptics of democratic capitalism, the United States is, quite simply, the enemy. For many years, and still today, a principal function of anti-Americanism has been to discredit the nation that stands as the supreme alternative to socialism. More recently, Islamists, anti-modern Greens, and others have taken to pillorying the U.S. for the same reason. To travesty the United States as a repressive, unjust, racist society is a way of proclaiming: Look what happens when modern democratic capitalism is implemented!"

"Why is the USA casually accused of "fascism," when it is a land that has never known a dictator over the course of two centuries, while Europe has been busy making troops of them?"

"In the best cases, the Ameriphobes put the jihadists and those who would resist them on an equal plane, not pronouncing in favor of either."

"Tens of millions of immigrants have streamed into the United States. If the picture of America drawn by the European press is accurate, then those immigrants from all parts of the world were deluded fools. Why choose the American capitalist jungle with all its evils, rather than the lands of peace, plenty, and liberty they came from? Why didn't they write their families and friends basking in the paradises of Ukraine, Calabria, and Greece warning them of the perils of poverty, precariousness, and oppression in America?"

"The great irony of this anti-American obsession is that it aggravates the evil that it aims to extirpate, namely the go it-alone impulse famously ascribed to the U.S. By criticizing the Americans whatever they do, on every occasion--even when they are completely right--Europeans (we are not alone in this, but we lead the dance) compel Americans to disregard our objections--even when we are right. The American reflex, conditioned by the constant avalanche of anathemas coming at them, causes them to keep thinking: "They're always blaming us, so why consult them at all? We already know they'll vilify us."

And so America's enemies and allies alike, valuing animosity toward the U.S. over influence on her, condemn themselves to impotence. In the process they strengthen the American superpower.

Jean-Francois Revel, who lives in Paris, is author of How Democracies Perish, The Totalitarian Temptation, Without Marx or Jesus, and the new book Anti-Americanism, which will be released in an English translation in November by Encounter Books."

Even the french get it right, once in a while.


Khan
Yes, I never meant that the RI story wasn't real. I'll keep reading Dr. Adams, He makes good points and uses satire appropriately, like Ann Coulter. ;)

Khan’s point – to a point
Though I usually agree with Adam’s positions and enjoy his columns, there is a germ of truth to Khan’s point about Adam’s often blurred line between truth and satire, particularly of late. I think his recent practice of seamlessly mixing presumed truths and satires within a single column justifiably leaves many readers wondering from sentence to sentence what is truth and what is fiction. It also opens the good doctor up to charges of avoiding accountability for his statements when he can selectively claim at whim that this particular sentence was satire, while that one was the truth. In other words, if you accept his statement, then it’s truth – if you successfully call him on something, it’s satire. It puts me to mind of the Simpson episode where Krusty the Clown was running for Kongress and was continuously spouting politically incorrect statements. His response to his critical handlers – “It’s a joke! Whenever you give me that look, it’s a joke!” Personally, I do not thinking mixing and matching truth and satire works very well in general. Good satire is structured on certain rules, and I think that Adams can be credibly be charged with breaking a few here lately.

2nd...
Fletch is right, the Bill of Rights doesn't spell out our rights, it's a restriction of Governemnt. AOL got sued because they wouldn't allow CCW holders to even have guns in their parking lot, which went to far. AOL still banned gun inside the building, as was their right. I don't think that it's *smart* to ban guns in workplaces but it is legal.


Tom Geairn III/The Crawfish
Tom, if you're for real, I wish you success.

Crawfish: A very big high five to your posting! I loved it.

euroconservative
euroconservative writes: "Not all Europe is socialist. I always wonder why so many of you despise Europe so much. Don't forget that in Europe there are more than 30 countries, each one different, some of them very good allies of the US. And in all countries there are leftist parties and conservative parties, people who love the US (like me) and people who dislike the US (but I think that it is strangely the same in the US, where there are a lot of people who dislike their own country)
Kind Regards from Old Europe"

Well said (especially since my mother was from Europe). However the current, controlling interests in the EU are primarily from the socialist countries. I do admire those conservatives in Europe that have to put up with liberal bovine excrement.

Have you also noticed that our Liberal Americans seem to think that only France and Germany count as Europe? How else could they deny that over half of the EU countries are in alliance with the US in Iraq.

beez and AudiR10
I really appreciated your comments and felt I had to add to them.
I, too, find that younger, particularly college-educated, people are showing certain traits which reveal their utter ignorance and unwordliness. Many of these young people appear to have difficulty in communicating effectively and understanding the importance of honest debate and free speech. I agree with AudiR10 that younger people often substitute four-letter words for nouns, verbs, and adjectives rather than resort to a more concise vocabulary. Many also resort to arguments ad hominem and vitriolic pronouncements rather than engage in free-thinking and the exchange of ideas. This is especially disappointing to me because I am well-under the age of 45 and tend to get tarred with the same brush.
Those educated ignoramuses scare me. They are drunk with the power to shut off debate and to persecute independent thinkers that has been granted to them by the faculty and administration of their campuses. Like many of their professors, many of these students have no experience having to make it in the real world working at real jobs, and have not an inkling of how their actions are destroying the very rights they abuse.
Like beez, I attended elementary school in the 1970's. Back then, the educational system was not quite as corrupted as it is now. I remember that constitutional rights, such as the right to exercise freedom of speech and the right to peacably assemble were, were routinely taught in the classroom. When I went to college in the 1980's, the left was clearly dominant at the private Benedictine college I attended, and competing ideas were respected and allowed into the debate. The respect for the right of others to express their ideas, no matter how repugnant to others, existed with the expectation that ideas, rather than the person, were debated. We had benefit of being exposed to ideas we might not agree with but which encouraged us to engage in critical thinking.
As Mike Adams has shown, those days are clearly over in socialist Europe and in the halls of our educational system. Since liberals have not succeeded by dumbing-down the debate or by making personal attacks on persons with differing viewpoints, they have resorted to outlawing everything that does not fit their narrow-minded, secular, pseudo-egalitarian worldview.
I have a suggestion. Let's divide the country into Liberal LaLaLand on one side and Redneckville on the other. Just like the America-haters who continue to perplex us by seeking entry into the land of the Great Satan, I would bet that after about a year the number of left-wing nut jobs seeking to escape their own utopia would exceed the number of people seeking to have their rights taken away in exchange for governmental nannyism.

Homogenitality
I confess I enjoy Dr, Adams' commentaries; he is smart, witty and uncompromising when it comes to entertaining fools.

In this column, a fevered EU homosexual talks about homosexual sexuality.

If you think about that, homosexuality is an oxymoron. Intrinsic to human sexuality is the requirement that sexual congress MUST be hetero in nature. The requirement that sexuality be hetero in nature is absolutely central to the meaning and purpose of sexuality.

When homosexuals engage in sodomy, (oral, anal, or maybe even (!) auric or nasal [are there any orifices left?] genitals may be involved at least by one member [pun unintended] but it is anything BUT sexual in nature.

Maybe the proper term is homogenitality or something.

EU Needs More Children Not More Laws
It's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Speech Codes, laws that regulate carbon emissions (EU ready to outlaw the incadescent light bulb -so is California, but you know what I mean), laws, laws, and more laws.

But the real crisis to hit Europe is the paucity of native European children. Plainly speaking, there are few, so very few children. Most rural villages in Germany have long closed thier schools; in parts of Scandanavia home schooling isn't a right, but a necessity. OBs are out of work, and in many Euro hospitals they can count on one hand the number of children they deliver in a month.

The only area of growth in the European population is the arab underclass. Sealed off in thier urban and suburban ghettos they are teeming with children. The average age of a native Euro is about 38; for the arab underclass it is about 19. The arabs average about 4.7 children per couple, the Euros about 1.2 and that's including the Catholic Poles.

Europe as become a wealthy, genteel, metrosexual playground where for the next decade they can fantasize about problems which do not exist. Yet, the Grim Reaper will come sooner or later. Within 30 years, Europe will be one giant geriatric ward, where the Mosque will replace the Cathedral, and the burka will replace the mini-skirt.

But go on Europe, continue your slumber. Happy dreams.

khan
posted, "It appears that there is no "European Human Rights Panel" at all - it doesn't exist, at all, anywhere."


A Harvard University website titled "International Human Rights Clinic/Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School" indicated "In February 2004, a European Court of Human Rights panel decision found for the first time in its history a breach of Article 14 of the European Convention on grounds of racial discrimination." http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/hrp/clinic/past_projects/europe/echr.html

Maybe Harvard Law doesn't exist either, khan. What planet did you say you were from?

Read the original letter from the"Panel"
It reads like it was written by a student who needs some remedial English classes before he finishes his freshmen year at Public State University. It does NOT sounds like any official European panel whose crapola I have ever read.

I don't think the group exists. I don't know if Mike Adams thinks the group exists or not, but I doubt it.

Khan does have a point. The satire is not always easy to pick up on. Even Neal Boortz linked to Dr. Adams column exposing the KKK at KKKent State. Liberalism are outrageous enough that it's hard to tell the difference.

For example, liberal activists trash a Mike Rogers' office, descrating a "We Support Our Troops" sign with red paint, presumably to show their support for the troops.

Hopefully Loyal Democrat will post here and clear things up for us.

Khan
We will not miss you.
Come back when you grow up.

SandMan
Yeah, it comes from all of that whining! Click on my handle and read the article on WHY liberals are malfunctioning humans. It explains a lot and comes from several years of observing their moronic posts.

Steve O
I posted some pics from the libturd's protest in the Land of Red Nancy Pelosi on my blog. Click on my handle and give them a look. BE WARNED, the LAST picture will inflame and anger a real American.

JD Wrightwing
Per your suggestion, that is a very basic idea of not having a single federal system, but republic of united States. This distribution of laws and regulations would allow citizens of the union to 'vote with their feet'. Having dozens of different states leads to different ideas being implemented, experimenting with laws simultaneously, leading to the adoption of the most successful ones by the others.

The concentration of federal power is greatly limiting our ability to pursue local governance - though you can still see it in some forms as you compare and contrast the governments and the 'average' people from California and Michigan to Texas and Georgia.

DavidMac
"European Human Rights Panel" is NOT the "European Court of Human Rights," It's similar, in name, to confuse the ignorant into thinking they're legit.

Doc Adams
Your problem is you are looking to Eurabians, excuse me, Europians to understand humor.

The nearest you can get is the British but they are either so dry we miss half of it or so inane we wish we had missed half of it.

The French, forget it, have you ever tried telling a Frenchman a joke? Believe me humor is way below them.

The only thing that brings a smile to the Germans faces is the thought of a few panzer divisions headed towards Paris.

Eastern Europe is too busy worrying about Russia reviving the old Stalanist ways and Russia is too busy trying to clone Stalan so they can get Eastern Europe back.

About all that leaves is the Italians and although they do smile alot I think that has more to do with good wine.

The US Sense of Humour
Does no one in your country have a sense of humour? Seriously?

I thought the original advertisement was hilarious (And has been run as such by satirical comedy programs in my own country) and the bull detector was screaming full blast at the mere mention of "Heterosexual White Male" scholarships. Perhaps the Republicans running it didn't phrase the campaign or advertisement as good humouredly as it could have, but really...

I'm just glad I can crack a joke and not be yelled at. And we don't even have an explicit constitutional right to Free Speech. :D

Unbelievably Hilarious!
Folks, keep your posts relatively short, this isn't a blogspot, and no-one is particulary interested is pseudo-scholarly diatribes.

SandMan writes: Wednesday, March, 21
Contest:

Dear Applicant,

Despite your unorthodox method of coming to our attention, the Scholarship Board is delighted that you have responded to our Scholarship Offer.

We must unfortunately inform you that the details you have provided to us do not qualify you for the Scholarship we have on offer.

We extend our best wishes toward you in any other Scholarship applications that you may wish to make.

Regards,

College Republicans

Wacky
What do you mean, we had Ayatollah toilet paper back in the 70's. We know humor. ;)

Great posts
Good job by many TH posters. I have been in tears with laughter reading your comments.

For euro conservative:

You wrote "And in all countries there are leftist parties and conservative parties, people who love the US (like me) and people who dislike the US (but I think that it is strangely the same in the US, where there are a lot of people who dislike their own country)."

Good observation. Allow me to confirm it for you. There are three basic kinds in the US (and there are of course exceptions to this).

There are people who love their country. These people are known as "conservatives".

There are people who only like their country when a Democrat is President. These people are known as "liberals".

The third kind are the people who love their country but are afraid to admit it when there is a Republican President. These people call themselves "moderates" or "independents".

Wacky
Evidently not. My example was deleted. *shrug*

drolmorg
There is no website important enough to take it hard. ;)

EUP on HR
Does anyone 'sides me think the letter was written by a student in the University of North Carolina?

The writing style appears to be that of a sophomore stoned on marijuana, perhaps his sophomoric approach to satire?

BTW, TH is having numerous problems with their servers, not to mention the occassional attack by Left Worms and Moonbats.

Mike, I am looking forward to your next satirical column !

Pappy Michael
Has to be Dr. Adams because the return email address doesn't exist. Dr. Adams claimed he replied, twice, but it's not possible.

I guess the Bottom line is
Jokes about killing gay people just aren't very funny -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4725959.stm

http://direland.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/irangay_teens.jpg

http://direland.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/irangay_teens_3.jpg

(only an indecent pig would find the above humorous in any way - and this happens to gay people on a daily basis across the globe - even young boys like these)

But I'll be the first to admit that the European Human Rights Panel should find better things to do than continue providing material for the sort of sophmoric drabble that is Mike Adams.

Allen
I never made it past the first link and if that's what you think "jokes" are, no wonder you're angry.

Why don't you admit that the European Human Rights Panel doesn't even exist and then maybe you'll actually get the satire.

Patriot
Whatever - this whole thread and Mike Adams last two columns are particularly bad, unfunny satire under the best of circumstances.

As to the links, of course you couldn't make it past the first one. Please peruse some of the many other "gay themed" threads here at TH - I have seen this much gay bashing since Andrew Dice Clay was popular. This sort of tripe certainly doesn't help the poor kids in those photos, now does it?

Making jokes about murdering gay people is just not funny, sorry folks. Micheal Savage was actually mocking the murder of a transgendered women on his radio show today - was that satire? That make you guys proud?

To all
This is a copy of my letter to Dr. Adams:

The Conservative Mind

Dr. Adams the European Human Rights Panel, or Karlo Kraljev, or Karol Adam Kralj do not exist. They where fabricated by me, so I can play a trick on you. This is way I what to apologize to you:

Im sorry it was so easy to make you believe EHRP exists, this is because - you wanted it to exist so you can show the World what kind of martyr life a conservative has to live.

Im sorry it was so easy to make you believe Europeans are going to ban you from their continent, this is because - you are prejudice toward Europeans, like EU cares what you think.

Im sorry it was so easy to make you believe liberals are some psycho, crazy people trying to get you, this is because – you think they are some psycho, crazy people trying to get you
Im sorry it was so easy to make you believe homosexuals have your destruction on their agenda, this is because – you have their destruction on your agenda.

Im sorry it was so easy to make you believe you will be prosecuted for your words, writings and thoughts, this is because you know very well your words, writings and thoughts are rubbish.

Im most, most deeply sorry for you (and all conservatives) that incest is illegal (my deepest feelings).

It was so easy to make you believe all those false things because you are a man of bigotry and prejudism, as are all conservatives.
I have proven beyond any reasonable doubt: Conservativism is just a pretty word for bigotry, incest and prejudism.
And, I have almost forgot, liberals do understand satire, but Dr. Adams let us be true, today – THE JOKE IS ON YOU.


The French Liberal



P.S. Im so sorry, my previous letters, where not labeled: WARNING! YOU ARE ABOUT TO READ SATIRE!

Allen
Whatever? OK, that's how we'll treat your lack of a sense of humor.

Whatever.

none
Liar.
It wasn't you, because Dr. Adams claimed correspondence, which isn't possible.

Not even a good try but I do believe you are french.

Patriot
Try this address EHRP@post.t-com.hr, if you think Im a liar

none
email.t-com.hr doesn't exist, Dr. Adams could not have replied to it. If somebody has since registered and created it, that changes nothing.

post.t-com.hr
post.t-com.hr doesn't exist either.

patriot
try to send me a letter, And ask Dr. Adams was there a third letter from EHRP which he didnt publish?

Why would I do that?
DNS is what translates names to IP and vice-versa. If a domain doesn't resolve, it cant be reached. In effect, it doesn't exist, unless you know the IP, if at all.

[10:30 AM] * Dns resolving http://www.t-com.hr
[10:30 AM] * Dns resolved http://www.t-com.hr to 195.29.150.179
[10:30 AM] * Dns resolving webmail.t-com.hr
[10:30 AM] * Dns resolved webmail.t-com.hr to 195.29.150.95
http://www.t-com.hr and webmail.t-com.hr resolve to IP because they exist.
t-com.hr, according to thier website is "Croatia's leading telecommunications provider of both fixed telephony and Internet services."


[10:30 AM] * Dns resolving email.t-com.hr
[10:30 AM] * Dns unable to resolve email.t-com.hr
[10:30 AM] * Dns resolving post.t-com.hr
[10:30 AM] * Dns unable to resolve post.t-com.hr
These do not resolve.

Perhaps Croatia just doesn't know how to set up DNS or perhaps they got blacklisted for SPAM from their internet cafe or hotspots, but they don't resolve. Maybe I'm just lucky. :D

*shrug*

Flag as Offensive offensive
What for Townhall provides this offensive option?
So we can all be governors of everyone's manners? I thought the point was to satirize the thoughtless, recursive, hypocritical nonsense of the enemy. It may appear a good idea, but methinks it's the philosophical equivalent of taking your ball and going home.

Flag this.

Satire
Funny how selective folks can be as to what is funny and what is not.

Dr. Adams,
excellent!!
So many good points made. I doubt the EU or the URI gets any of it.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.