Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, January 22, 2007
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Shaking Hands with the Unemployed
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Editor’s Note: The following column contains some very naughty words.

It should come as no surprise that a men’s restroom at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport has become a playground for those who want to masturbate in public and have sex with men they don’t even know. After all, Atlanta is a hotbed of homosexual activity and public restrooms are favorite gathering places of many homosexuals.

But some may be surprised that, since December, police officers have arrested and charged 11 men with public indecency in the Atlanta airport. That is because there has been little talk about the arrests. And that, in turn, may have something to do with the fact that “Dirty Nearly Dozen” includes University of North Carolina Professor Dr. Hugh Tilson and Spelman College Professor Lev T. Mills.

It unsurprising to find out that Mills is a Professor of Art. Such departments attract some of the most far out non-conformists among us. But it is surprising to find out that Tilson is a Professor of Public Health. Before his arrest, I had always considered public masturbation to run contrary to the public health. But in the age of diversity, I’m becoming increasingly willing to reconsider some of my basic assumptions – some of which may be based on antiquated notions of morality.

And so today, I wish to extend an olive branch to Professor Tilson – and maybe even a fig leaf – in the hopes of bridging the gap between the so-called traditionalists and secular-progressives that seem so at odds in today’s cultural wars. I do so in the form of an offer to substitute in one of his public health classes while he takes the time to straighten out his legal affairs.

This Monday, I will travel to UNC-Chapel Hill to substitute for Tilson, giving this brief quiz as a means of generating discussion for the rest of the week:

1. The university has, in recent years, placed a high premium on making students feel “comfortable” in a university setting. How comfortable do you feel taking a class from a public masturbator?

2. Next month, the university will sponsor “The Vagina Monologues.” On a scale of one to ten, how badly would you like to see a film called “The Angina Monologues,” which chronicles a man’s recovery from a heart attack induced by seeing another man masturbating in an airport restroom?

3. An Atlanta TV station recently reported that no public masturbator had yet sexually assaulted anyone in an Atlanta Airport. But some were watching small children urinate in order to become sexually aroused. If a small child had been aware of this, was he not a victim of assault?

4. What are the public health benefits to be derived from ejaculating on the floor of a public restroom?

5. What are the public health benefits to be derived from impersonal sex?

6. How much money do we spend on AIDS research relative to cancer research?

Why the imbalance? Are professors the ones responsible for this? If so, why?

7. Is it more likely that Professor Tilson will be a) fired or b) promoted to a high- paying administrative position in the Office of Campus Diversity as a result of his recent arrest?

8. Would your answer to the previous question change if Tilson were arrested in the ladies restroom?

9. Does Pee Wee Herman regret his decision not to become a college professor?10. Which profession has lower moral standards: a) The acting profession, or b) the professoriate?

I can hardly wait to get to Chapel Hill on Monday. Needless to say, I will drive and not fly. It promises to be a stimulating week.

Editor’s note: In Dr. Adams’ next installment he will examine the issue of whether Lev T. understands the gravity of the situation. To be continued…

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Quiz
I think I scored a 9/10 on that quiz, just not sure.

re: question 3
Since the Atlanta media are so keen to find the up side, give them time, Mike. They'll spin it around to reporting it as assault with a friendly weapon!

Any bets.....
....about which political party these professors/victims support?

:-)

Mike Adams article
We badly need more Mike Adams. A straight shooter who has the good sense to criticize many of our college professors.

What a sad bunch of educators we have in colleges and universities. Should be.

Mike Adams article
Correcting the last statements in my comments.

It should read SHOULDN'T BE.

Holy Sh*t
I haven't been through the airport in Atlanta since about 1990 but it appears that things have changed. Oh well, just one more reason not to fly.

Put the blame where it belongs...
...on society! If gay professors were permitted to marry there would be no need of this!I mean really marry,not the fake marriage of Governor McGreevy!If society weren't so judgemental,our men's rooms would be safe,especially in our well policed locations like airports!


Not Loyal Democrat.

Perversity is risky
Suppose a pervert professor, while in a state of masturbatory rut, propositions the wrong person in an Atlanta airport restroom, and ends up in the hospital. Will the academic community file a civil rights lawsuit? Wouldn't surprise me.

Rolling my eyes
You know, even if you think homosexuality is OK, there's a time and a place for everything. And in public usually isn't it, for a lot of things, not just this.

I'm looking for the people who will seriously try to defend these idiots.

none, Straight shooter?
Now THAT's funny!

Name65-66
Society, huh? Okay. I can see how a person would be inclined to go to an airport, walk in the bathroom, unzip his trousers ( or dress, who knows?), arouse himself by staring at little boys and shake his pistol until he shoots silly string.... BECAUSE SOCIETY MADE HIM!

If that sounds silly, read your post again. Because that's what you wrote.

It's not society's fault. Lose the old, tired, insufficient excuse from the 60's and hold sexual deviants to the consequences that they deserve.

You will get arrested
You will definitely get arrested if you attempt to smoke in the airport. How far our culture has fallen!

Sheesh.
Déjà vu example of “Oval Office Sink” leadership.

My life stolen
I want the five minutes it took to read this back!

Come on Mike, you go from excellent article to absolute garbage faster than I can spot a candybar.

Nam65-66 & JF
...Nam, you are ever so silly. We should have homosexuals marry because OTHERWISE they'll go to public restrooms and masturbate? So then unmarried heterosexual individuals can also be found in restrooms masturbating? You've just made a huge case for the terrible psychological instability of homosexuals. Poor things, they have no other options...? Is that what you mean?

JF, I just disagree, is all. This article may be of lighter weight than most of Mike's but it's a morsel nonetheless.

JF
You are wrong. No one is covering this story but Adams. The implications are serious, given that these perverts are watching our children. Plus, he is a PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSOR.

Mike
I sure hope none of these students these deviants teach, come in, and he has to shake hands with them.

Confusion
Dr. Adams appears to have confused the titles of his columns. This column seems to bear the title that belonged to another more recent column having to do with panhandelers. This column should have been given the title of the former "How to Manhandle Theose Who Panhandle". Or is that stretching the pun too far in referring to a UNC (Chapel Hill) professor as a panhandler?

Unemployed
If I cannot use a public Restroom without being approached or seeing Gays,Why can't Female Prostitutes solicite their trade at the door also,I would much prefer that!!

Relax RR and Krystal...
...I just suffer from a bad case of ECS(East coast sarcasm).I'm in a twelve step program for it,but I haven't been able to get passed the first step.

As I stated,I'm not Loyal Democrat.

Nam65-66
Whoops! You had me going.

Gay "marriage" no solution
I encourage those who believe gay "marriage" will solve their problems to read the following, written by a gay:

"The Truth About the Homosexual Rights Movement"
By Ronald G. Lee
New Oxford Review
February 2006
http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3650

serious topic
JF, I happen to think that columns exposing those who watch children pee for sexual pleasure are of the UTMOST importance! why do you need those five minutes back? got a plane to catch?

I don't know...
In a way, I agree with JF...I didn't enjoy reading this column very much. It bored me. But at the same time, I very strongly agree with all of you who say it's important, because it really is. It's disgusting that people would do this to begin with, but the fact that it's not being reported in the media is even more disgusting.

65-66: Don't worry, I got the sarcasm. I actually enjoyed reading your post more than the article...it wasn't nearly as important a message, but it was more entertaining. :-)

When in Atlanta...
Always wash your hands after touching doorknobs. You never know where they've been.

GEM



I'm flying out of Atlanta
in a couple of weeks. I'll definitely NOT send my kids to the bathroom unattended.

Just wondering...
What is the relevance of the title to the actual article?

One more example
Adams discusses yet another example of how sex is the highest priority of the left.

Higher than health.

Higher than dignity.

Higher than morality.

Higher than life (abortion).

As soon as you recognize that leftists believe their desire to instantly gratify themselves whenever they feel the urge to have an orgasm supercedes all other considerations their behavior actually becomes quite logical.

Jimmy Joe
"Shaking hands with the unemployed" is a term for masturbation.

oh great....
This coming Saturday I'm flying to Atlanta on my way to Florida to visit my brother. On DELTA airlines, no less.

This brings a whole new meaning to "layover," in Atlanta.....

I'm wearing latex EVERYTHING to walk through that cesspool....

Maybe these professors misunderstand the whole concept of not bringing anything more than 3oz. of liquids on airplanes.....perverts.

This is just your average weirdo report
JF, I happen to think that columns exposing those who watch children pee for sexual pleasure are of the UTMOST importance! why do you need those five minutes back? got a plane to catch?
***************************************
Respectfully, we'll have to agree to disagree:
1. This has nothing to do with unemployment, which is what I thought this was about originally.
2. This column is nothing more than rehashing some metro back page summary of the weekly crime arrests.
3. Whats to argue? They are pervs. These types of arrests happen all the time. These arrests will continue in the future. Its on the same level as pervs looking through holes into women’s restrooms etc. Not worthy of a serious discussion in a column and is a general detriment to Adams’ more worthy articles.

Hmmm... Spin?
Let's see... Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Airport is the world's busiest airport, with 60million+ passengers travelling through the terminals a year.

That's an average of, roughly, 5 million passengers a month and does not count non-passenger "traffic" (airport employees, vendors and their employees, family, USO, etcetera).

And Mike can find ELEVEN incidents in just under one month? Even assuming a roughly 10% arrest/charge/detection/report rate... assuming 100 *actual* incidents with 89 unreported/undetected/etcetera)... that's less-than 0.002% of *ALL* the traffic through Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson.

That's *HARDLY* a "hotbed" or "playground" and certainly nowhere near as prolific as Mr. Adams alludes.

Re: "It should come as no surprise that a men’s restroom at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport has become a playground for those who want to masturbate in public and have sex with men they don’t even know. After all, Atlanta is a hotbed of homosexual activity and public restrooms are favorite gathering places of many homosexuals."

Hyperbole, anybody?

Happy Jake
I completely agree.

Shower time
I was just passing through the Atlanta airport the other day. Ugh.

HOw about the others?
So Mike found out that a couple of professors have been doing the nasty solo in the men's room? What about the occupations of the others caught in the sting operation? Were any of them perhaps businessmen? You gotta watch those capitalists--talk about free enterprise! I could go on, but won't; the point is that Mike has no more right to make his plain inference that all professors like to spoil the serenity of a man taking a leak than he would allow liberals to say that all conservative men become aroused by close contact with their AK47s.


Again???
Adams is clearly the most gay- obsessed opinionator I've read.

Why don't you just get it over with and make the leap, Mike? A double life takes too much time and energy.

Ewww
Maybe these disgusting professors are going for bathroom tenure. Ewww.

Another thought
You are the only person I know who spends time in an airport worrying about what is going on in the men's room...next time, try the peanut snacks in the convenience mall - much more staisfying.

JoJo
He's gay! He's gay! He's gay!

Isn't the "he's gay" put-down offensive to gays?


I still remember the 6 foot wooden pe*is
in the dining commons.

Folks ask me why I actually support coed bathrooms (which I do, sort of) and all I have to do is state that the presence of women would end the gay solicitation as the women wouldn't tolerate it. Women wouldn't tolerate the masterbation and all.

A man complaining about this probably would be arrested himself on hate crime charges.

that's right...
NO ONE should be masturbating anywhere. It's a sin. Oh no. I said the "S" word!!! Also--it's particularly weird that so called "professors" as high and mighty as some of them think they are--are passing their "free" time this way. Don't they have papers to correct? Or did the pages get too sticky? Why does sex and everything related to sex take such precedence in this country? Think what a world we could live in if we spent that kind of time praying instead?

JoJo
If it's such a non-issue, have the papers and tv pick it up in their front page and prime time reports. I'm sure it wouldn't cause too much of a disturbance in this "gay-friendly" America (sarcasm.). Oh, wait, it reflects a bad light upon the gay community by exposing this - we wouldn't want to disturb the shiny, squeeky portrait of homosexual America.

Mike S. Adams has an opinion
But, if that opinion is derived from nasty facts that mainstream steers clear of, and involves blacks or homosexuals then clearly something is wrong with the writer. right?

Sorry, Mike. Stick to articles about Rich, White, Home-owning, Heterosexual, Gun-owning Males. Opinions about anything else make you sound obsessive. (more sarcasm)

For SamIAm
When did I ever say that an honest declaration of your gender preference was offensive to anybody, including gays. What's ofensive is trying to separate the part of yourself that you don't like by attacking it.

What was that minister's name again?

If there is anything more icky than anaymous sex between men in a public bathroom, it's a "straight" man hanging around in there so he can write about it on the internet.



ooops
anonymous.

reagan guy
"Stick to articles about Rich, White, Home-owning, Heterosexual, Gun-owning Males. Opinions about anything else make you sound obsessive. "

Opinions about other topics don't qualify as obsessive - writing about those other topics in 3 out of 5 columns seems a little curious.

Pirate
The reason you support co-ed bathrooms makes sense today. But it's pretty ironic since separate bathrooms were created,and required by law, to PREVENT people from having sex in them.

Now we have to eliminate them to do this. Some people may call this progress. I call it something else.

Be careful

Rosie O'Donnell gave a co-host all sorts of grief over saying "I don't know where that hand has been." HUM

re: Reagan Revolutionary
Reagan Revolutionary wrote:

"If it's such a non-issue, have the papers and tv pick it up in their front page and prime time reports. I'm sure it wouldn't cause too much of a disturbance in this 'gay-friendly' America (sarcasm.). Oh, wait, it reflects a bad light upon the gay community by exposing this - we wouldn't want to disturb the shiny, squeeky portrait of homosexual America..."

>>>>>>>

Nevermind that *eleven* reported/deteceted/charged incidents in just under one month amounts to roughly 0.00022% of *ALL* of the monthly traffic through Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson Airport. Over 60 million passengers... an average of roughly 5 million-plus a month... pass through Hartsfield.

Even assuming a roughly 10% report/detection rate... assuming 100 *actual* incidents, with 89 unreported... that's still LESS THAN 0.002% of *ALL* the traffic through Hartsfield.

EVEN *IF* we account for 50% of the traffic through Hartsfield being women, that would be an average of 2.5 million men per month, *AND* assuming 100 *actual* incidents, that's still, *ONLY* 0.004% of all the male traffic through Hartsfield. EVEN IF we *ASSUME* that half the male traffic are children, then with (assuming) 100 *actual* incidents, the incident rate rises to *just* 0.008% of *ALL*, adult male, traffic through Hartsfield.


It *IS* a "non-issue"... it is no more of an issue, if not less-than an issue, than the incidents of theft at Hartsfield... *because* the incidence rate is BELOW 1% of ALL (adult male) traffic through Hartsfield. Disgusting? Absolutely, but this is *hardly* indicative of a prolific problem.


Evidently the liberals hold no monopoly whatsoever on hyperbolic, emotionalistic fact-less, irrational fear-mongering...

Packrat
Didja HAVE to mention two-ton Rosie....

I was TRYING to eat my lunch..

CMoore
How's the new Scientific Atlanta working for you? You still have sexual deviants exposing themselves in public restrooms where people, including children go into. Fear-mongering? Emotional-what? First homosexuals want out of the closet, now the media should sweep their activities under the rug. Which is it? Hyperbolic... what!?!? Wow. Did I touch a nerve? Is "fear-monger" a word?? hehehehe. great post!

CMoore
Homosexuality is always an issue for the people who are most afraid of it, usually in in terms of their own gender insecurities.

I've noticed that people who are secure in their sexual identities usually have more interesting things to think and talk about.

JayJay
Is 3 of 5 out of the norm for Dr. Adams? i've only started reading him in the last 2 years. I think it's a vital piece. It's something that maybe no one reads much about - but he happened to write on it. The writer comments on his experience in the world and publishes his work without sugar coating. Yet, he writes them about Homosexuals. No one would blink an eye at a 3 month (all summer long) attack on the gun industry. Because guns are bad. Gays are good. The media is trying to teach me this. Apparently I'm not the lemming that they wanted me to be.

JayJay
"Homosexuality is always an issue for the people who are most afraid of it, usually in in terms of their own gender insecurities."

Aaah!! Thank you, Dr. Moore. I was waiting for that one. I KNEW I forgot one. Rich, White, Heterosexual, home-owing, gun-toting, HOMOPHOBIC (not really a word, but I'll humor everyone) males are the bane of America.

That's the next one I need to learn. My opposition to homosexuality stems from my supposed "fear and hatred" of them. I don't like Shakespeare either. What's that called? Bardphobia? get a grip - Homosexuals are like any other entity, no right or priveledge over anyone else.

homosexuality
We SHOULD be afraid of it. VERY afraid. Ever hear of AIDS?? We should be afraid of EVERY deviant behavior. And yes, for the record, I WILL define deviant. If you're offended by my referring to homosexuality as deviant, well then, I'm offended that you're offended.

Missed the Point
I think several posters completely missed Mike's point. Most (if not all) liberal professors attempt to portray an elitist attitude… “I must occasionally come down from my elevated position of intellectual superiority and educate you commoners on how a truly advanced society should operate. You should dispose of your antiquated religious beliefs and your prehistoric so-called ‘family values’ and free your mind to open expression and a liberated…blah, blah, blah.”

Then they get caught j**king-off to little boys in the airport.

If two catholic priests got caught doing this do you really think you would have had to read Mike’s column to find out?

cracking up laughing
Thanks for the analogy - I couldn't come up with that to save my hide. I think the same posters will continue to search for a way to critique Adams' column and protect their beloved deviants.

substitute drugs for homosexual term
And is this even a story at that point?

Really, the instances of drug use in the same stalls must be multiples of these instances. Why is this not being discussed?



JF
Drug abuse at the Atlanta Airport isn't being discussed because it's not as sexy and titillating.

Exactly
JayJay writes: Monday, January, 22, 2007 1:50 PM
JF
Drug abuse at the Atlanta Airport isn't being discussed because it's not as sexy and titillating.
*********************************
Exactly. Thats all there is to this.

re: Reagan Revolutionary
Reagan Revolutionary wrote:

"How's the new Scientific Atlanta working for you? You still have sexual deviants exposing themselves in public restrooms where people, including children go into..."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Sure. There are deviants exposing themselves in public restrooms, including restrooms used by children, *BUT* at an incidence rate of LESS than 0.001% of ALL traffic through Hartsfield AND THAT is assuming a much higher number of incidents than are actually confirmed.

EVEN at a incidence rate of 0.01%, it is a statistical improbability of witnessing or being approached or accosted by one of these pervs. There's a far greater risk to being groped by TSA than being approached by a willie-wanker in the men's room.


So, evidently, the chances... the incidence rates... don't matter to you. If *ONE* person does it, it's an epidemic problem that must be quelled immediately!


Yep. That's fear-mongering (re: using emotional rhetoric -- "omigosh! the CHILDren..." -- to engender fear and motivate a response) and hyperbole (re: grossly exaggerating the problem) at it's irrational finest!









SamIAm
Oh! LOL! Thanks. Didnt know that!

It don't Matter
Heterosexual, Homosexual, Vegisexual......

Just don't do it in the d*mn bathroom. Is that such a hard concept to grasp?

Reagan / Cooper
I think there is no other subject that arouses such fear and excitement in otherwise well-meaning people than that of homosexuality.

It fact, it's so horrible one just can't stop thinking about it, over and over!

sekhmet
Apparently it is...yuck.

I'm disappointed...
...Kimberly has not responded to this column yet. She brightens my day with her wit and charm, like no one else can.

JayJay
I think its not so much fear of homosexuality as it is a justified lack of tolerance for their sexual promiscuity. There is a reason AIDS is so prevalent in gay culture. This article simply chronicles a minute portion of a greater trend (or actually multiple trends, since Adams addresses the moral bankruptcy of the professoriate as well).

And "homophobia" is not a fear of the homosexuals, but fear that their lifestyle will damage the moral fabric of society.

A Left Handed Education
I would like to see Professor Tilson take his class with him the next time he visits the Atlanta Airport, (I assume his visit was for the purpose of research), and show his class how unclean the floor of the men's restroom is. (Of course, he would use his left hand to set the stage for the class.)
This could lead to a serious discussion on the need for government control of cleanliness at airport facilities. A proposal to educate the public on this need could be funded by an additional 1% "per hand" tax applied to each airline ticket. He could write a book and explain how young boys using the restroom at the airport contributes significantly to the uncleanliness of the restrooms. The subsequent positive book review by The New York Times would lead to appearances on the morning MSM news shows followed by an appearance at a congressional committee hearing to propose more government control of airline rest rooms.
What a future lays ahead for this professor! Parents are already putting money aside to send their young ones to Chapel Hill to be educated by such a prominent educator!!!
P.S.-Remember to use your left hand.

Some of you are missing the point
Mike Adams is writing about this incident not because it is about homosexuality, but because it involves two professors, one of whom is a public health professor. His main focus in all of his articles is the debasement of the professoriate. This is just another example. We should all be concerned about this because these are the kind of people we send our children to college to learn from. Do you want your child to learn about public health from a man who is masturbating in an airport restroom? Hell, I wouldn't even want to use that restroom, much less sit in his class and pretend that anything he says has gravitas.

CMoore
Wow. Put the calculator away. Did you read Icedog or "Rand"y's posts? Can you see the forest through the trees, yet?

not important column just read on Rush
Well, the case just got important. Rush just read straight from the article on air a few minutes ago. Things should heat up soon for the Ivory Seater Peter Beater.




Folks....
Any gay man who is having random sex with whomever walks in an airport restroom isn't 'out of options'... Rather, he is exercising WAY too many of the ones he DOES have.

the true American decline
This columnists describes .0002 percent of all passengers using the men's room as a "hotbed of homosexual activity". All that reveals is his fantasy life.

Aids is no longer prevalent in the gay community, it is most prevalent in the drug-user community, but I realize that's not as much fun as gay-bashing. As for homosexuals "damaging the moral fabric of society" I think that's happening right here in a more serious way.

I've written this before, but not so long ago gays were executed in Switzerland by cutting up their bodies while they were still alive, making it last for four days.

Why do you all think this society is so distanced from that kind of fear? And if you're so worried about the "moral fabric of society" and public health problems, why is nobody talking about drug use?

Further, why does it seem like people on the right never have a better time than when they're throwing up their hands in moralistic outrage and condemning other groups? Why would you take the word of some idiot who's teaching in a third-rate college to form your opinions about other members of our society?

re: Reagan Revolutionary
Reagan Revolutionary wrote:

"Wow. Put the calculator away. Did you read Icedog or "Rand"y's posts? Can you see the forest through the trees, yet?"

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Did you read Mike's first paragraph -- you know, his "introductory" or "thesis" statement??

"It should come as no surprise that a men’s restroom at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport has become a playground for those who want to masturbate in public and have sex with men they don’t even know. After all, Atlanta is a hotbed of homosexual activity and public restrooms are favorite gathering places of many homosexuals."


Did you READ *my* posts? I was addressing Mike's hyperbolic fear-mongering outlined in his introductory paragraph.

A less than 1/10,000 rate of incidence *HARDLY* makes Hartsfield's restrooms "playground[s]". And it is *HARDLY* indicative of a "hotbed of homosexual activity".

agreed
As I said, I think it tells us more about the columnist's fantasy life than it does the facts.

AIDS no longer prev. in the gay comm.
Yes, and the Chinese are excellent drivers.


You recon
Bwarney Fwank has been to the Atlanta airport yet? He can research whether or not these Profs should get a golden parachut or a gerbil.

Okay
All y'all can have sex in the bathroom, and I can serenade you with the Rodeo Song in the key of OFF!

"Oh, it's 40 below, got a heater in my truck....."

and top it off with such hits as Badger Badger.

People hetero- homo- vegi- geo- or sheepo-sexual doin' it in the public bathroom get on my nerves, so I'll get on yours in return. Happy?

JayJay's Top Ten Rebuttals
10. Shut up, you're gay
9. Shut up, you're gay
8. Shut up, you're gay
7. Shut up, you're gay
6. Shut up, you're gay
5. Shut up, you're gay
4. Shut up, you're gay
3. Shut up, you're gay
2. Shut up, you're gay
#1 (three-way tie)
Shut up, you're gay
Shut up, you're gay
Shut up, you're gay

Hooray
Glad you got my point.

You should do something about your tourette's, however.

There're lies, d@mn lies and.....
CMoore writes: Sure. There are deviants exposing themselves in public restrooms, including restrooms used by children, *BUT* at an incidence rate of LESS than 0.001% of ALL traffic through Hartsfield AND THAT is assuming a much higher number of incidents than are actually confirmed.

-----------------------------------------------

Put the calculator away or learn how to use it. If you did a little research you would find that these men were being directed to this particular restroom by websites and it had become known as a meeting ground for perverts that can arrange their travel plans around a "sexy" rendezvous. Not exactly a chance encounter with the law, it’s similar to getting arrested in a cat house and claiming you only happened upon it because you heard the piano music.

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/10796669/detail.html


Your claim that the "arrests" would include only 10% a percentage of all such activity in the restroom, (by the way I doubt all 60 million travelers make that particular restroom part of their travel itinerary) boggles any attempt to be mathematically accurate. All the arrests took place on two days - try throwing that into your “equation”.

Stawman with his aldente swingin'
OK,
Let's get some facts straight:
First, Adams does not say anything about AIDS and Atlanta--he does say that Atlanda is a hot bed of homosexual activity--NOT THE AIRPORT but the entire city...

This fractional percentage incident rate non-sense is laughable because your focusing attention on anything but the actual topic.

Which is primarily why two, so called professionals, would be in public bath rooms endagering our health--one of which is supposedly a Public Health professor...

The CDC report: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2005report/table1.htm

Shows 18,722 male-on-male HIV/AIDS cases showed up in 2005 UP from 16,556 in 2004.

While injection drug use was a fraction of this at 3,506 UP from 3,314 in 2004. Less than 25% that of homosexual behavior.

High risk sexual behaviour--not homosexual--came in at 4,333 up from 4,095 in 2004. Less than a 25% for homosexual behaviour.

The homosexual propaganda is getting old.

Homosexual behaviour is 4X more likely to get you AIDS--IN AMERICA than IV Drug use.

Fear mongering? What is so fear mongering about asking why I have to work extra each year to give a bunch of irresponsible high risk behaviour guys my hard earned money for AIDS research when only a fraction of like money goes to heart disease research.

That is another key point missing from the liberal argument cache. I suppose its behind the "your a homo!" retorts.

Heart Disease according to the CDC is "the leading cause of death for American Indians and Alaska Natives, blacks, Hispanics, and whites."

http://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm

Calling Adams homophobic and fantasizing about being a homosexual--really helps your arguments by the way--man they persuade me I'll tell ya'

Meanwhile keep killing your friends and loved ones with propaganda and nestle yourself indignately with ignorance.

Big bear hugs at you!

?????
JayJay writes: Aids is no longer prevalent in the gay community, it is most prevalent in the drug-user community, but I realize that's not as much fun as gay-bashing. As for homosexuals "damaging the moral fabric of society" I think that's happening right here in a more serious way.

==============================================

Is that why any health care professional will ask if you have been involved in any high risk activity like gay sex when you give blood? Or are they taking time out of their day for gay bashing too?

http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/wha/wha_aidsr_crs.htm

Or from the gay community:
http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/transmission.html

oh boy - JayJay, please read closely
>This columnists describes .0002 percent of all passengers using the men's room as a "hotbed of homosexual activity". All that reveals is his fantasy life.

Sure, this describes .0002 percent of all passenger traffic (I will concede the point although it is not grounded in factual data). The point of Adam's article is that here deviant behavior intersects with academia, which is probably closer to .0000002 percent of all passenger traffic, but might be as much as .02 percent of all academics. We can quibble back and forth all day about the extent to which such behavior takes place, it is irrelevant to Adams' main premise that: 1) these are the people teaching young Americans in the colleges, and 2) there is a conspicuous lack of media coverage (which I might add, in relation to the Duke Lacrosse rape cases).

>Aids is no longer prevalent in the gay community, it is most prevalent in the drug-user community, but I realize that's not as much fun as gay-bashing. As for homosexuals "damaging the moral fabric of society" I think that's happening right here in a more serious way.

According to the CDC, 35% of all new infections occur during homosexual intercourse, of which there are around 40,000 new cases each year in the US. I would call that prevalent. This threat alone is bad, the compounding homosexual activity with drug use proves especially dangerous.

>I've written this before, but not so long ago gays were executed in Switzerland by cutting up their bodies while they were still alive, making it last for four days.

So you would suggest the past violent persecution of homosexuals is equivalent to modern-day Christians who merely do not want them to get married and/or would prefer they engage in their lifestyle within the confines of their own home and not in public?

>Why do you all think this society is so distanced from that kind of fear? And if you're so worried about the "moral fabric of society" and public health problems, why is nobody talking about drug use?

Um, they are...

>Further, why does it seem like people on the right never have a better time than when they're throwing up their hands in moralistic outrage and condemning other groups? Why would you take the word of some idiot who's teaching in a third-rate college to form your opinions about other members of our society?

I didn't read anywhere in Adam's piece in which he trashed or was otherwise critical of the homosexual lifestyle. I think his beef is with hypocrites who teach Public Health at the local college and then engage in behavior contrary to that, and create a minor public health hazard at the airport. His beef is also with the apologist media which refuses to cover these stories which potentially affect the safety of people (with small children) at the airport.

Dr Tilson
I don't think the thing should be sugar-coated as the evidence won't stand up in court.
More seriously, he is very bright, has a distinguished career, a wonderful family and is all the attributes that normal standards tend to hold in high esteem. However, this incident, if true, is a major stumble and I am shocked to have heard about it. But, that does not mean that it should be covered up, glossed over or otherwise dismissed - air it out and let the rules of law and public opinion resolve it.

Statistics
Here's a statistic! I dropped my bilfold in the men'sroom in the Atlanta Airport and had to kick it along the floor clear out to the curb before I felt safe in bending over to pick it up!

And Just Look!
They stole one of the l's out of my billfold while I was kicking it along the floor! Tricky Devils!

Career Choices!
Just be happy that Dr. Tilson is bright, has a distinguished career, a wonderful family and all the attributes we hold in high esteem!

Otherwise, he could be working in Denny's or Applebees. Think that over!

More Career Choices.
Is Proctology in the Public Health Medical Career Cluster? Will I be edited for using the term Cluster in this context?

THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY
Interesting the Atlanta police grew a pair and actually busted a few of these deviants.

Not too many years ago, the gay activist catchcry was for society to tolerate the private activities of consenting adults.

Now, when police monitor public toilets for lewd behavior, they're accused of "homophobia."

Gay activists are evidently now seeking endorsement for the public activities of consenting adults.

If some s*domite started floggin his meat in front of me or tried to grab my bag I'd put his head in the trough, hold it down with my foot, and p*ss on it!

re: Hockey Goon
Hockey Goon wrote:

"... Put the calculator away or learn how to use it. If you did a little research you would find that these men were being directed to this particular restroom by websites and it had become known as a meeting ground for perverts that can arrange their travel plans around a 'sexy' rendezvous. Not exactly a chance encounter with the law, it’s similar to getting arrested in a cat house and claiming you only happened upon it because you heard the piano music..."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Wow... Hockey Goon, you actually managed to both write *AND* hyperlink on the web. Can you read, too?

I never claimed it did *not* happen. I never claimed that deviant weren't misbehaving. So your efforts to demonize my assertions I never made are simply pointless.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"http://www.wsbtv.com/news/10796669/detail.html

"... Your claim that the 'arrests' would include only 10% a percentage of all such activity in the restroom (by the way I doubt all 60 million travelers make that particular restroom part of their travel itinerary) boggles any attempt to be mathematically accurate..."

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Again, I have to wonder if you are capable of reading. I never claimed any such thing. Rather, if you'll pay attention, I made an allowance for the sake of argument by *ASSUMING* a HIGHER rate of incidence than confirmed.

It's quite simple. There's no way to *KNOW* exactly how many incidents occur or have occurred since a percentage have *NOT* been reported or detected. Thus, rather than rely upon simply the *confirmed* incidents (the 11 noted by both Adams and the article you linked) -- which, by the way, results in an average 0.000022% incidence rate per month -- I made an allowance that is (probably) *VERY* high in order to illustrate the incidence rate.

By the way, according to the "Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network" ( http://www.rainn.org/statistics/punishing-rapists.html ) "61% of rapes/sexual assaults are not reported to the police".

If we accept that figure as valid, we can infer a similar rate-of-report/detection for these kinds of incidents as well. Thus, with 11 incidents in under a month representing 39% of *all* incidents, then we can infer a grand total of roughly 28 incidents with roughly 17 unreported/detected cases in the report period (re: "since December"). With an average 5 million passengers per month, that brings it *DOWN* to a 0.00056% rate of incidence for *ALL* the traffic.


But, you are absolutely correct. I did not bother with a complete statistical analysis *BECAUSE* my assumptions result in a VERY GENEROUS rate of incidence that is STILL so statistically small as to be a non-issue. If we factor in, as you pointed out, that only a small percentage of "travelers make that particular restroom part of their travel itinerary", then the rate of incidence goes down even further.

By discrediting my accuracy -- which was knowingly and intentionally skewed *IN YOUR FAVOR* -- you actually serve to prove my point: The rate of incidence is so statistically small as to be nearly non-existent.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"... All the arrests took place on two days - try throwing that into your 'equation'.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

They did? On just two days? Where's your source?

Mike Adams said "since December" and the website you linked said, "Atlanta Police have arrested 11 men on indecency charges at Hartsfield-Jackson Airport IN THE PAST MONTH alone..." (emphasis added). Nothing in the article you linked says anything about all of the arrests taking place on just two days.

So... 11 confirmed incidents in one month is still a fairly reasonable assumption. Gee... that's actually the number provided by your article, so... well... gee... it WAS factored into my equation.

What's wrong

What's wrong with doing the aforementioned in the privacy of one's motel room, apartment, or other PRIVATE abode? If the persons had done this, Mike wouldn't have a column and they would not have to explain to the cops sbout their "activity"

Nah, too easy, too simple.

truetolife
Perverts aka homosexuals brag to heterosexuals about the numberous partners they have during an orgy. Any wonder why these perverts have the highest rate of stds of any human?

Anti writes:
"Perverts aka homosexuals brag to heterosexuals about the numberous partners they have during an orgy."

Hey, Ant, if you know people like this your problem isn't homosexuality, it's your low class of friends.

Why don't you get out of your bedroom and find people who aren't into orgies?

Icth
"The point of Adam's article is that here deviant behavior intersects with academia"

That has to be the most stupid statement of all. So Mike's friends got busted? Must mean all professors and intellectuals are deviants! Burn the books! We could do what the red Chinese did and go from school to school throwing them out of windows!

So what about the fundamentalist minister who recently got busted having gay sex - does this also mean that there is a vast intersection between the gay community and Evangelical ministers?
==============================
"So you would suggest the past violent persecution of homosexuals is equivalent to modern-day Christians"

I never said it was equivalent. I'm saying that just a few changes in social circumstances and most of you would be sitting in the front row with your box lunch, with this columnist cheering on the hooded guys. I'm saying it's the same continuum, and your protest that all Evang. want is for them "to stay in their homes" is rubbish. Have you even been reading these posts?

I don't care
I don't care if it's homo or hetro. Give the rest of us a break. It's about discretion.

Britney is not near as cute as she thinks she is. Rosie isn't as bright as she thinks she is.
Nor is Barney Frank.



Atlanta, how Appropriate...
Atlanta, headquarters for the C.D.C.

Get you S.t.d., at the home of the C.D.C.

I for one, am proud to be homophobic.

idiocracy of the "liberated"
Another example of the harvest: "if it feels good, do it" and "it's just anybody's opinion, what's right, what's wrong" and so on: the dicta of this f...ed-up (literally), "no limits" culture for the last 40 years or so.

One almost longs for Victorian reticence, when a glimpse of stocking was simply shocking. (Of course private behavior was the same because human nature is static; but a clear distinction obtained between private and public. It was, in the final analysis, a question of good manners, and of consideration for the perceptions and feelings of others.)

What quaint, old-fashioned ideas I do have.

elitist wet dreams
given 60 million passing thru Atlanta Airport of which 11 are arrested for indecent behavior of which 2 are college professors... let's see... divide by the number of kinky professors... carry the one... by my calculations, the odds that Mike Adams (a college professor) would jerk off in a restroom while making connections in Atlanta are better than 2-1.

Billary's Teithmaster 'New Math' just...
Doesn't Compute...Must be a loooong 'happy hour'.

Talking about wet dreams...
The visual of Hillary's thighmaster is just TMI (I'd say disgusting but...) Who would want to get anywhere near her thighs!

Reflection
I believe we all need to step back and take a look at this for a moment, because this an esteemed professor at the number 2 public school in the nation. Are you kidding? An airport bathroom? And a public health professor to boot, wow. He must have the sex drive of a 15 year old....or, well, nevermind it's just creepy. Don't blame society, becasue society doesn't care, the man deserves no respect.

J.'s reflections
Good points. One of the things the libs are great at is deflecting what the key points are. Even if I find homosexual behavior is abhorent or I am in full agreement that anything goes, there are times and places where that is just not the case. And a public restroom is not one of them.

I don't care what the ratio is of folks who go in and just pee and those who masturbate or do other things in front of others, any more than one is too many! Especially if the individuals are those that Mike Adams pointed out.

JP, Otis, Colo, J.
Let me guess, you are....Christian!

Real credits to your religion.

JayJay...
Ya think!? :-)

I may not be the devout Christian I should be but it is amazing how one views the world from a Christian (or Catholic as I was taught as a child) does for one's world view and how we see relationships.

I attend a Methodist church today but that will only last until they start condoning all version of lifestyle as equally valid (my congregation hasn't gotten there yet). My wife is a life-long Methodist but I think she will also be willing to go elsewhere if/when that happens.

Icedog
How true. If these were Catholic Priests, there would be non-stop coverage. Not just locally, but nationally. However, liberal professors are part of the protected class in the MSM. Catholic Priests are not.

CMoore and mixed Hot beds
I do not know of any statistics on Homosexual activity but the CDC has some useful information:

Atlanta is ranked #8 of 92 American cities (with populations >600,000) in AIDS "rate of cases" and prevalence (Table 7.)

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/2006supp_vol12no2/pdf/HIVAIDS_SSR_Vol12_No2.pdf

Given that AIDS and Homosexual activity are intimiately linked...(see posts above) and sodomy does not always lead to AIDS, I would call Atlanta a "hot bed" of homosexual activity.

Although you could make an argument it is warm compared to NY, Miami or Los Angeles.

CMOORE focuses attention on the 0.0000xxx incident rate at the Airport. Meaning what?Proof that Altanta is not a hot bed?

I think this was an honest mistake on CMOORE's part but Adam's indicated Atlanta--not the H-J Airport alone--was the hot bed.

Given the entire year of 2005 there was ONE forcible rape, 16 violent crimes, 12 aggravated assualts, and 3 robberies at the H-J airport (http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_11.html)

--Arresting 11 men in a bathroom over a single month for masturbating while viewing other men and performing sex acts with Children nearby qualifies as ALARMING!

Finding out two trusted educators are participates is doubly so.

Defaming someone because you don't like what they say is reckless and irresponsible.

No argument holds water that starts with spit. You look foolish even though you may be smart and you change no one's mind.

Given this proclivity for incident rates, is performing sex acts with Children nearby or masturbating while watching military men at acceptable levels at the Airport?

Do you want your children to attend the classes of the two instructors arrested?

I don't--that is not homophobic.

Acknowledging that people are dying because of a lifestyle choice is not homophobic.

Pointing out that AIDS research gets more money than Heart Disease is certainly not homophobic but necessary in a land where political correctness runs amok.

Not wanting to pay for their treatment drugs as "science catches up with their sin," is not homophobic.

Choosing to ignore facts can kill you.

Deliberately and knowingly derailing open discussion on such a topic is irresponsible.

Do try to think about these things as you write.

Big Bear hugs at you!

Quix
"Not wanting to pay for their treatment drugs as "science catches up with their sin," is not homophobic."

Shame on you.

There are morons and there are MORONS
Cmoore, if you are so interested in numbers, why don't you go take a few statistics classes? Your numbers are meaningless in soooo many different ways and a complete waste of space.

Sloopy
That's exactly the kind of thing people write when they can't comprehend another person's post. If you could understand it, you would be able to debate it intelligently.


Jp, Otis, Colo, J.
My comment was meant as sarcasm, because the sentiments you express are the perfect example of why I left Christianity and the people who call themselves Christians.

On a more temperate note - this is a subject I feel strongly about not because I'm gay but because I've had alot of gay friends over the years who ultimately knew me well enough to tell me their personal stories.

People like yourselves, and the idiot who wrote this column, have absolutely no idea what life is like for most gay people, or the diverse entities they present as human beings. You talk about the fact of their gayness as if that made them something other than human beings, who are in fact 99.9 per cent exactly like you. If I wonder aloud what causes the extreme fear and aversion to homosexuality, and conclude that it can only be some kind of irrational, personal horror at the very idea of it, where you have to relegate all gay people to pedophiles or bathroom sex jockies, of course I wonder why this is so and then wonder what you are saying about yourselves. After all, what are you so afraid of? To Quix, yes, i would let my college age children take classes from the condemned if they were good teachers and humane people. My children were not stupid. Do you think that gay men (it's always the men, even in Nazi German) woudl somehow be able to hoodwink my sons, and convert them from their welcome, yet bothersome testosterone-drive pleasures to a life with the same sex? Do you think that homosexuality is such a terrific choice that people choose it in a rational manner, or are seduced by the benefits of it's life-style? Then you really are talking about your fantasies.

You all write as if the only way to measure the value of any human being is who he has sex with - as if, human beings only had a single dimension to their lives.

By coincidence, I watched a doc tonight about the experiences of four homosexual men who had survived the Nazi regime ultimately but who had spent years in prisons and concentration camps for their genetic crime. I know, I know, it's tacky to bring up Hitler to conservatives but it was still a lesson in scapegoating gone bad.

I've read alot on the subject, and over the centuries there have been many civilzations, some advanced, some not so much, who found a way to institutionalze homosexuality and bring it within the boundaries of the culture so that everybody would have a respectable place, and the larger group could remain in harmony. I won't bore you with details, but you can trust me that it is so.

When people are angry or afraid about others there is always a reason. But that very anger and fear can have tragic consequences, as we have learned from early 20th century lynching parties and Jewish progroms & expulsions. I would like also to say that the fears that made these things possible were always, always the end result of astonishing ignorance.

Last, I once sat in a meeting where this subject came up and a member said that she was against homosexuality byut in fact had never known any. I happened to know that at least 45% of the people there were gay - she didn't recognize that fact in any of them, because she was looking for a kind of unreal sterotype that wasa never going to appear.

We are enslaved by fear, and fear-mongers, if we don't laugh them off. The truth is, over the course of my life I've noticed that really secure, "manly" men don't have a problem with their gay acquaintances.

Clarification
The Sentence that says "not becaue I'm gay' was misleading; I'm not gay, I'm female and have two sons, and have never been attracted to a gay life.

Re do Math

Not all persons going through ATL are male. so you need to double your rate.

Not every one uses the bathroom at the airport ( they're so dirty and full of people) , so multiply the rate by an unknown factor.

So may go twice, reduce the rate.

Without controls, statistics are guesses designed to try to prove a point.

JayJay
One cannot have a rational debate with you, because like all cowardly liberals, once you are cornered by reason you hurl epithets. Thats why you will never amount to anything but a sniveling liberal who seeks to address your own personal insecurity by haughtily asserting your own "moral superiority."

solution
Here's a solution for those homosexuals who need to spy on little boys to get their hoo-hoo-dillys standing at attention. When caught, the offending homo is immediatley field castrated by police. Once his "boys" are "liberated" the offender will have the sex drive of a brick. Thus preserving the safety of our public restrooms.

Bye
I'll let Icth respond to your cheerful recommendation for castration, Harp - he seems to think everyone on this thread is presenting rationale discussion but me.

Castration of gays is such a great, Conservative, Christian solution to homosexuality - and it's easy to see from the rationale discussion on this blog that that's what we coulod expect if Ch. Cons. come into the power they long for.

Castration was also a satisfactory solution for the Nazis, along with less permanent forms of torture. Why not do some research and take a lesson out their playbook?

Jo Jo
I have friends who are homosexual, and I have no issues with them. I have issues with grown men and women behaving like rutting pigs. I have issues when public facilities are ceded to behaviors that should only be practiced in private. I have an issue with people who apologise for behavior that they would condemn when the focus shifts from homosexual to heterosexual.

You mentioned that you have two sons, what do you think their reaction would have been if they had witnessed the acts in question? Assuming that they will produce grandchildren for you someday (a safe assumption given your discription of their testosteron charged lives) would you want your grandchildren to witness these acts?

No, I didn't think so.

Jo-Jo
Pu-lease! What is there to comprehend?

A. He can't do basic math
B. He quite apparently understands NOTHING about what makes a valid statistic
(just a FEW of the problems with his approach
have been pointed out by others already)
and

C. What in the heck do his 'numbers', if he understood them in such a way as to reflect the frequency with which the population engages in public sex acts, have to do with the fact that this bathroom has, and I quote:

"become a playground for those who want to masturbate in public and have sex with men they don’t even know" ?


Answer? N O T H I N G

What percentage of the population (present in this airport, much less the population potentially present in this bathroom) is engaging in this behavior has exactly NOTHING to do with whether this behavior is appropriate and acceptable or whether it is a problem that needs to be dealt with.

John-of-Gilknockie has done a good job of explaining why, if you are capable of understanding it.

Liberals
This is a perfect example of changing the subject from nasty and universally disgusting public jerking off to the high plane of ignorant discussions of the statistical liklihood of such acts by Professors versus Christians! And even rational posters taking the bait and baying off into the woods away from the game that Professor Adams has so aptly treed. And what is so disgusting are the smug self-evaluations of intellectual Superiority; based on that very ignorance. And, I do not confine my subjects to Statistics. Arrogance and Ignorance seem joined at the hip in Liberals. In all fields of knowledge...Or lack thereof.

JO-Jo
Would you allow your children to run across streets and hwys without stopping and assuring their safety? Why do gays practice unsafe "Sex" in unsafe places, then make hetrosexuals pay for it and still to continue this practice. You say you know some(many)gays. How many are in the same relationship with the same person? How many protect themselves from AIDs. That was a first. Four Homosexual men had a genetic id for homosexuality,(not). The same choices that are touted for homosexuality do not seem to bring much happiness, is that why they continue risk aids with flaunting protection, or is it because they can expect others to pay for bad choices.

Just asking
Here's a fair question: Why is it that you morality - arbiters never talk about all of the heterosexuals that stalk, kidnap and sexually abuse kids? Since statistics show that there are more of them than gay predators, why aren't you asking that they be castrated?

Why are you all devoting so much time and energy to the subject of gays?

Nam65-66
Marriage does not guarantee fidelity.

Hey, RJ
I think you forgot to take your anti-depressants today. Incidentally, I think that since Icth considers me irrational he would find you a geniuine intellectual peer, along with the guy who was recommending castration.

"why should a social conservative help a self-defeating, sadistic, periluteal phasic, borderline psychotic male or female who is narcissictically hostile?"

Huh??? Does this description only fit gay people or do you know any heteros who could be described that way? Or are you describing both preferences?

"Secondly, why do you and your ilk consistently confuse heterosexuality with bisexuality and homosexuality,ie.,child abuse?"

That sentences doesn't make sense. I only said that children can be abused by both gays and straights - why don't you and your ilk ever concern yourselves with straight people who abuse children?

And, thirdly, please give a rational response as to why you believe we should be teaching neurotic children to *******ing"

I don't know what you're talking about. Maybe Icth can translate - he seems to be smarter than me. Did I say we should be teaching children anything destructive? What is ********ing? I guess we liberals are naive, or at least don't spend as much time as you do picuring children who are learning *******ing, whatever that is.

I think all social conservatives, religious or not, would like a reasonable explanation as to why individuals like yourself are not put into high risk insurance pools to accomodate your self-destructive and suicidal sexual behaviors, similar to others who engage in high-risk
behaviors.

Perhaps you need something stronger than anti-depressants, something anti-psychotic. Why should I be put into a high-risk insurance pool? You're the one who seems to be infatuated with the idea of children ******ing. As for me, I haven't done anything high risk in years, if ever. The most high-risk thing I ever did that I can remember was to go fishing without a license.

Calm down, sport. You are conforming to stereotype.

Re: oh great....

truetolife writes:

> I'm wearing latex EVERYTHING to walk through
> that cesspool....


Oh, come on. You remind me of the Texas senator
Molly Ivins mentions in one of her books, the one
who wore a shower cap over each foot when he took
a shower in his San Franscisco hotel because he
was afraid of catching AIDS. (Which was all the
more ridiculous when you consider that hotels are
for out-of-towners.)

You people remind me of a bunch of little girls
who are afraid of catching cooties. You probably
touch restroom doorknobs and door handles without
a second thought most of the time, nevermind that
so many people walk out of restrooms without washing
their hands. But the moment you hear that people
have been masturbating in certain restrooms as well
as urinating and defecating, you're all but standing
on chairs shrieking and waving your petticoats around.

You must be the macho, testosterone-soaked right-wingers
in all those liberal stereotypes...


-CB-


Re: Solution

Harp writes:

> Here's a solution for those homosexuals who need to spy
> on little boys to get their hoo-hoo-dillys standing at
> attention. When caught, the offending homo is immediatley
> field castrated by police.


'Course, heterosexuals NEVER prey on children, no sirree...



-CB-


It Isn't Just Mike...

...who seems to be obsessed with homosexuals.
I think it's a LOT of conservatives.

Anyone whose followed the Townhall.com forums
for any time at all has to have noticed that
the longer an exchange lasts, the greater the
possibility that somebody will find a way to
work homosexuals into the discussion.


-CB-

Hurrah for Creight
At last, a voice of sanity in a sea of madness.

JJ and CB: IMAGINE
the nerve of conservatives discussing homosexual's in response to an article about......homosexuals!

I know, I know, it's hard for you guys to follow a train of thought. I'll make this short in an attempt not to surpass your attention span.

Go back to past articles about child molesters..don't worry, kids, townhall has 'em. Some of them are even about..*GASP* MEN abusing little girls!

I imagine it's too hard for you to predict what the commenters posted about, so I'll make it multiple choice. Pay attention now, and try your VERY best:

The conservative commentors thought such child molesters are:

A. Great! We need more of 'me.
B. Okay...I mean, live and let live, right?
C. People to be dealt with harshly
D. Child what? I thought we only talk about
-homosexuals at town hall.


Yes, little fellers, the correct answer is C!!

Surprise!

Guess what the liberals had to say..oh, you don't have to do you? *snort*


Are you idiots for real? I mean, REALLY??? REEEALLY???

imagine, part II
You need a wider view. Here's what Townhall posters write about:

A. All gay people are evil
B. All Liberals are evil
c. All people who don't like the war are evil
d. All people who aren't Christian are evil
(especially all muslims)
unless they're Jewish, in which case
they will be turned into Christians
at the end of the world
e. All child molesters are evil, but since
they're all gay anyway they don't
have to be listed twice
f. All Media and people who work for the
MSM are evil, including the single '
mother who delivers our paper are evil
g. All single mothers are evil unless
are widows because of the war
h. All college teachers are evil unless they
write gazillions of hate messages on Town
Hall, in which case they are automatically
brilliant, and not evil.
h. All people who try to think outside of
hamfisted, bumper sticker generalizations
are evil because it means they are using
the devil to confuse the people who are
not evil.



Tsk Tsk
I think it's funny that you keep talking about MY suicidal sexual behaviors to children. My children will find it especially funny, as will my grandchildren. Obviously, this close-to-psychotic fantsizing about me is giving you some kind of pleasure, but it also tells me alot about the kinds of people who frquent these sites, specifically, you.

Got to go - I'm about to have a ten year old for breakfast.

A long day
After which I need to drown some puppies for a black mass.

A last one for VG, Castrate-man, et.al.
This is going to be it for me, guys – just wanted to say it’s been fun, if not very enlightening. I’m not a frequent Townhall poster but I here’s why I have been so involved in this one:

Over my numerable years I have known many people whose lives were damaged, and sometimes ruined, by people like you. They were well meaning, good people who fought in your wars, served in your elected offices, healed your sick relatives, and in one case, devoted years to helping drug addicts get off the street, where they wouldn’t pose a threat To your tidy little lives that enable you to continue marginalizing them even further.

Many of them were beaten up for sport while still kids, most likely by the children of people like yourself and your friend, Mr. lets-castrate-gays. Two of them were hospitalized. One was run out of his small Pennsylvania town when it discovered that he preferred men, not in the local restroom but in his own private home. Another ended up with two broken arms.
When they told me their stories over the years, I couldn’t go back in time to fight on
Their side, but I can do what I can.
I never waste an opportunity to retaliate for them – my friends, alive and dead, and all
the homosexuals who were tortured, executed, imprisoned, castrated, and ostracized by people just like you right up until and including the twentieth century.

As I said, I couldn't be of help to them much when they most needed it, but If I find pleasure in flipping most of you the bird, it’s in their names.


We trust our children to these people?
We trust our children to these people.

AND we are not allowed to object because if you object you are a homophobe.


Personal injury lawyer on a banana peel?
http://www.givemetheinfo.com/blog/blogger.html
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.