Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, September 04, 2006
Mike Adams :: Townhall.com Columnist
Dennis the First Amendment Menace
by Mike Adams
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Although I’ve been writing about free speech issues for years, I’ve never actually called for the immediate firing of a university president. That is, until today. Anyone remotely familiar with the part SUNY-Fredonia President Dennis Hefner (716-673-3456; hefner@fredonia.edu) played in denying the promotion of Stephen Kershnar must surely agree.

Kershnar is a brave academic dissident who has challenged the politically correct student conduct and affirmative action policies at his university via a series of columns written for a local paper. He paid a price for his bravery recently when was denied promotion to full professor. This was despite a stellar academic record.

Kershnar’s promotion was widely supported - by colleagues, his chair, and other administrators – until it reached the desk of the president. The university’s top administrator wrote a letter denying the promotion, although he admitted that Kershnar’s teaching was excellent.

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the letter was the portion accusing Kershnar of failing (in his published columns) to grasp the difference between fact and opinion. Apparently, Hefner does not understand that such accusations of failure to differentiate between fact and opinion are not facts but, rather, opinions. And since Hefner is a university president (at least for the time being) the same newspapers that print Kershnar’s opinions would also be willing print his opinions. That is, if he had the courage to defend them.

But Hefner did not seek to expand the marketplace of ideas by engaging the professor in a debate. Nor was he in a position of needing to rebut any opinions he deemed unfair to the university. Every time Kershnar presented a conservative opinion in the local paper it was printed alongside a differing opinion by a leftist professor.

This puts Hefner in a special class of First Amendment villains. He isn’t satisfied with preventing debates from occurring on campus. He wants to use his power (not to be confused with his legitimate authority) to stop debate from occurring off campus, too. His zeal in insulating these campus policies from exposure to criticism is best explained by the fact that he was a major author of the policies.

Although Hefner was wrong in virtually every aspect of this case, Kershnar did absolutely nothing wrong until he perceived that he was facing swift and certain retaliation for exercising his First Amendment rights. At that point, he made the mistake of thinking he could work with the administration. He did so by offering to submit his writings to a university committee for prior approval.

Although Kershnar had offered to submit his writings to a “Prior Consent Committee” for a year, that wasn’t enough for Dennis Hefner. He responded with a request for prior restraint over the professor’s speech for an indefinite period of time – perhaps the rest of his career.

I have a special name for college administrators who are willing to withhold a promotion (and the money that goes with it) from a professor until he agrees to permanently relinquish his First Amendment rights. I call them academic extortionists.

But, fortunately, professors like Stephen Kershnar can always rely on the AAUP to come to the rescue when free speech rights – even those of conservatives – are threatened, right?

Wrong.

The American Association for Unprincipled Pacifists was under-whelmed by the magnitude of the prior restraint issue in Kershnar’s case. (After all, he wasn’t writing for The New York Times). So he turned to the only organization that defends both left wing professors (like Sammy Al Arian) and right wing professors (like Mike Adams). I am talking, of course, about the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

And the results of turning to FIRE were predictable. The organization used its media muscle to expose Hefner’s unacceptable conduct and, shortly thereafter, Kershnar was promoted.

But SUNY Fredonia still doesn’t get it. Christine Davis Mantai, director of media relations for SUNY Fredonia recently denied that Professor Stephen Kershnar’s promotion was a reversal of the president’s previous decision. Instead, she said it was a new decision made on a re-application, in which Kershnar better emphasized his contributions in the area of service.

This is more than a weak and disingenuous defense of administrative misconduct. It is an admission that Hefner still doesn’t respect the First Amendment. And it is more than sufficient justification for his immediate termination.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mike Adams is a criminology professor at the University of North Carolina Wilmington and author of Feminists Say the Darndest Things: A Politically Incorrect Professor Confronts "Womyn" On Campus.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Mike Adams' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Spoiled Brats Of The 60's
As mentioned above, those spoiled brats were also the marijuana smoking, pill popping, LSD freaking stoners in every college throughout the land.

Fossils
chr335 wrote in part (quoting someone else?): "Paleontology not only cannot come out with evolving fossils they come up with more intra species with no beginning or end.
This is due more to the fact of the improbablity of getting a fossil at all then lack of exsistence. it takes so many different factors that have to occur it is amazing we have any at all."

Yes, fossilization is extremely rare. For fossil animals to form many criteria have to be met:
1) The animal has to be relatively free from predation. Predators tend to carry off limbs.
2) The animal has to be either buried quickly or fall into still water. Wave action would break up the skeleton and separate it. Most fossils presuppose some sort of local disaster I should think. The tyrranosaur Sue is probably one example.
3) Over the eons the bone structure has to be replaced by minerals.
4) Reconstructing these animals relies heavily on comparative anatomy with sometimes significant parts of the skeleton missing.

On my home page news there was an article two days ago about the "Golden Age of Paleontology" that is soon to come. Even then the writer speculated that half of all dinosaur genera will be forever lost because there are no fossil specimens. Most species are known by only one or two examples.

As for Paul and evolution, yes, I agree it's a long shot, but I take the view that life is a manifestation of the universe that cannot help but develop, so it depends on your perspective. Do you have a better theory that doesn't rely on the circular reasoning of using a religious text to prove itself? Not being snotty. I just want to know. If there's something better I'd like to hear about it.

hard to get fossils
Paleontology not only cannot come out with evolving fossils they come up with more intra species with no beginning or end.
This is due more to the fact of the improbablity of getting a fossil at all then lack of exsistence. it takes so many different factors that have to occur it is amazing we have any at all.

i am really feeling disheartened by all the hatred both sides seem to be showing each other, and it saddens me when i know this bitter internal hatred will destroy this great nation of ours

Jimmy_Joe, Jay in Milwaukee, Sloopy
1. Sloopy: Pu_ta is Spanish for "who_re". Slightly different than the "cu_lo" situation in that Town Hall was at least consistent in its treatment of the English and Spanish versions of the word, not allowing either.

2. Jimmy_Joe: There was an easier way to find the offending word. Like you, I initially had no idea where I might have used the word "cu_lo" in my post. For future reference, just use the "search" option in your web browser. Or if that doesn't work, copy and paste your entire post into a word processing or text editor software and do the search there.

3. Jay: Yes, isn't it funny that the Spanish word for is taboo, but we can say the English word all we want to?

4. Good news: The problem is fixed now. Guess I got someone's attention posting my previous message on several columns. Now we can say "ridiculous", "reputable", and "pasta putanesca". I stepped on a few toes, though. Mary Katherine was really upset with me. Frankly, I'm surprised my post is still here on Dr. Adams's column. They deleted it everywhere else.

5. Even better news: As I found out when I tried to post the original version of this post, the townhall.com screeners have figured out how to ban a particular word without banning words that might contain that word. Now, we can say "ridiculous", but not "cu_lo"; "reputable", but no "pu_ta". And now they're being consistent about the Spanish and English words for "a(double-dollar-sign)hole", not allowing either. They've even figured out how to recognize it when you replace the S's with dollar signs.

Regards,
Trevor

Free Speech (sorta)
I had a supervisor once who criticised my memo writing. He said that I used "too many big words", ao that my memos required some people to have to "look up words" in order to understand my point.

My supervisor told me to use words "easier to understand".

I apologized and told him I'd be glad to use "easier" words. I also asked him to give me a list of all the words he didn't want me to use.

Needless to say, I didn't get the list of prohibited words nor did I foster congenial supervisor/subordinate relationship.

Shortly thereafter, he was laid off and I was promoted. Our branch manager said he liked my memo writing.

Phylo
You actually accuse someone else of not being a clear thinker! That is a good one...

LNC

Jay_in_Milwaukee
Jay_in_Milwaukee writes: "The only bone I can find to pick with this situation, the facts that have not been mentioned here, did Kershnar sign his opinions as Prof. Kershnar, SUNY-blah blah blah, or did he just sign his name? Did he or the paper publish a disclaimer that his views are opinions and and may not necessarily agree with those of the management?"

uhhhhhhhhh...hmmmmmm..let me think....

Kershnar's op-ed was about how he disagrees with his university's policy...and you want to know if he made it perfectly clear that "his views are opinions and and may not necessarily agree with those of the management?"


Did I get your question right??

University President
Time to get the tar and feathers out.

Trevor
I couldn't use the word indisput_able either. What does P U T A mean???

GoodOnPaper
WTF are you TALKING about??????

Three mistakes are apparent in this situation:
1)What you wrote about 1st
2)What you wrote about 2nd
3)Everything else you said

If you bothered to go to FIRE's website, you would see on display Hefner's opinion that Kershnar is in every way qualified for the promotion with the exception that Hefner does not approve of Kershnar's opinion pieces in the local paper. Hefner explicitly states that he is denying the promotion based on Kershnar's opinion pieces. Again HEFNER says this.

GoodOnPaper writes: "While Adams would love for you to believe that writing opinion columns is scholarly work, it is not. Again for you Adams fans:
WRITING OPINION COLUMNS IS NOT SCHOLARSHIP!"

Could you pretty please show me WHERE Adams and WHERE Adams fans suggest that opinion columns are scholarly work?????

The point here is that his opinion columns had NOTHING to do with his scholarly work, and therefore should have had NO effect on his promotion. And yet, ODDLY enough, that is EXACTLY what was preventing his promotion.

GoodOnPaper writes: "Once again, Adams wants you to believe that academic faculty positions are all about one's beliefs on current political events. In 98-99% of academic disciplines, such beliefs have NOTHING to do with what one is teaching or researching.

Are you being obtuse on purpose here???
Of COURSE such belief's have nothing to do with what one is SUPPOSED to be teaching or researching. Once again, in the face of indisput_able evidence (go to FIRE's website - you will see it in Hefner's own words) YOU want us to believe that the leftists in academia do NOT hold academic positions hostage to their political belief system.

Ecolution a total Scientific failure.
When you rely on one science(Biology) as the only criteria you defy all common sense.
Evolution is a statistical improbability/impossibility and no confidence limits even close to attainable..
Paleontology not only cannot come out with evolving fossils they come up with more intra species with no beginning or end.
Physics will never confirm Evolution.
If ideas evolve then the evolutionist ideas are totally passe.
And on and on


Its the biggest farce ever perpretated on an ignorant public.

FYI
If you go to http://www.thefire.org and examine the WHOLE correspondence you will see that Dennis acknowledges his excellence in teaching and research. He just relied on service/collegiality to deny him until he was exposed.

GoodOnPaper wrote:
> Again for you Adams fans:
>
> WRITING OPINION COLUMNS IS NOT SCHOLARSHIP!

Aw, that's just 'your' __opinion__

GoodOnPaper:
Thanks for those 2 salient points. I overlooked those.

Trevor and JimmyJoe
The filter's still speaking Spanish? (humor) It's the illegals. They're to blame. (/humor)

Sorry, baked, forgot the 2nd part
"I'm not talking about inserting ID, just eliminating the oft disproven Origin of the Species."

Disproven by whom? I'll admit the scientific Theory (which is different from the colloquial use of theory) has problems, but that's like saying the Kopernik's Heliocentric Theory should have been trashed as soon as we found that planets didn't travel in circles. Thankfully it wasn't and Kepler saved it.

Every scientific theory is a work in progress. It is never finished.

And if it's not evolution, then where did those species come from? That is the question the original paleontologists asked (Linnaeus, et al). I read in the Christian book "After Its Kind" that these first paleontologists were good Christians looking for answers.

If the ancient animals and plants weren't created, how did they get here? Science is going to ask that uncomfortable question (and already has), and will look for an answer.

Trevor
I had precisely THAT problem a few days ago... and couldnt find the "c_u_l_o" ANYwhere. I didnt even know what it was until you so kindly informed me just now! I ended up posting each paragraph individually, eliminating the offending word by process of elimination! R_i_d_i_c_u_l_o_u_s!!

bakedbones:
"Now, having read Godless, who's with me for eliminating Darwinism from American curricula?!"

Ummmm, didn't we just have a discussion about quashing the free exchange of ideas in academia...? Or was that subtle humor that went over my head?

What about Kershnar's ACADEMIC record?
Personally, I would like to have a look at Kershnar's resume before taking Adams' word that Kershnar has a "stellar academic record". Hefner mentions Kershnar's teaching but even undergraduate institutions like SUNY-Fredonia have some research and scholarship expectations of their faculty. Is Kershnar up to snuff in that area? Who knows?

Two mistakes are apparent in this situation:

1. Once again, Adams wants you to believe that academic faculty positions are all about one's beliefs on current political events. In 98-99% of academic disciplines, such beliefs have NOTHING to do with what one is teaching or researching.

2. As much as I want to take the liberal side in this, Hefner was inappropriate when he made Kershnar's opinion columns a promotion issue (if he was going up for tenure, though, there would be more leeway). Promotion is based solely on ACADEMIC accomplishment. While Adams would love for you to believe that writing opinion columns is scholarly work, it is not. Again for you Adams fans:

WRITING OPINION COLUMNS IS NOT SCHOLARSHIP!

Hopefully, in his effort to gain notoriety through his opinion columns, Adams is not shortchanging his own students, either in the classroom or as an ACADEMIC research mentor.

Those damned liberals...
Lydia said, 'There seems to be a trend involving three groups of people worldwide who wish to limit the political speech of those they disagree with: homosexuals, liberals, and Muslims.'

Yes, those damned liberals like me who find such a political basis for denial of promotion rather disgusting.

The only bone I can find to pick with this situation, the facts that have not been mentioned here, did Kershnar sign his opinions as Prof. Kershnar, SUNY-blah blah blah, or did he just sign his name? Did he or the paper publish a disclaimer that his views are opinions and and may not necessarily agree with those of the management? Did he at least once disguise his opinions as fact? Did his opponent?

Is the university exercising prior restraint on the so-called Leftist professor? I bet not.

I'll agree that it seems that conservatives and their ideas are being unduly persecuted in academia. I find such behavior disingenuous and disgusting from such places of so-called learning.

As far as the "re-application", it's possible his resume didn't reflect accomplishments or whatever the university chiefs were looking more, and that a re-do and reapplication fixed it all up. More likely it was window dressing.

Pardon me, Mr. (SUNY) President, your politics may be showing.

Who REALLY is Hefner
The biggest mistake that Journalists make is not finding out who REALLY are the people they write about.

Hefner rationalizes as a Gay. Gays pretty much think the same and their agenda always leaks through.

Some help for Phylo...
Phylo, ol' buddy... you seem confused. In an effort to help you out a little bit, I'd just like to point out the difference between opinion and fact is that in your opinion is there is no difference between opinion and fact, when in fact, there is.

Perhaps that helps.

( sheesh. ...what a maroon.)

Cry me a river
Sorry but I don't care. Why exactly should professors have more protections than the rest of us? I could be fired at any point for nearly any reason, or none at all, so excuse me if my concern is minimal.

Liberal or conservative, the whole concept of tenor and wreaks of the NEA at its worst. What if this person had consistently gone off in editorials pulling a Ward Chruchill? If you protect this individual than you there is no defense against the Churchills of this world either.

I like Mike Adams on occasion, but if the politics are too cruel, he can always get a real job.

Fredonia?
Fredonia? It sounds like something from a Three Stooges short. Like Moronica... hmm....

Phylo = STILL an idiot
Phylo, you worthless piece of human debris.

Kershnar's column was in the OPINION section of the paper. Not only was he expressing his opinion on a regular basis--BUT IT WAS ALWAYS EXPLICITLY AND PROPERLY LABELED AS OPINION, NOT AS 'FACT.'

Hefner seems to have a problem distinguishing between an assertion of fact and an expression of opinion. Here's how it is for Hefner (and Phylo):

What I think = fact

What you think = opinion

Phylo (still) out. Hope you tune in sometime before you die.

ridickulous
On Thursday, August 31, I attempted to post a comment here in response to Michelle Malkin's column of the previous day. My post contained the word "ridicu_lous" (without the underscore). I have to spell it with an underscore, because, apparently, we can no longer use that word on the Town Hall forums. Why? Because "ridicu_lous" happens to contain the word "cu_lo" (again, without the underscore), which is Spanish for "ass" or "asshole", and may also refer to anal sex.

This word is so obscure (at least to non-Spanish speakers) that it took me all day to find out the meaning of it. Moreover, we are perfectly free to use "ass", "asshole", and "anal sex", IN ENGLISH, with no censorship. So why has Town Hall banned the use of an English word that is very common (especially when describing liberals and their ideas), just to prevent people using an obscure foreign word for a body part that we can easily refer to in English?

I asked the editors of townhall.com that question. That was 5 days ago and I have received no response. Therefore, I'm taking this fight to the streets, so to speak. I'm posting this message on every column that comes up, in hopes that others will join me in this quest to reclaim the right to use the word "ridicu_lous" in this forum.

I am not a vulgar person by nature, so it pains me to have to do this. But as an example of the ridicu_lousness of this ban on "cu_lo", I would like to list a few of the ENGLISH words that we can use freely here (I feel confident in this list, since, if any of these trigger a censor, the message will not post):

piss
twat
dick
pecker
ass
asshole
tit
tiddy
damn
hell

(There were four other words that I originally included in this list, but they were censored, apparently only because they occurred IN COMBINATION, implying that if I had used them separately, they would have been permitted. Two of these referred to the primary female reproductive organ and began with a "C" and a "P", respectively. Another referred to the primary male reproductive organ and began with a "C". The fourth word referred to feces and began with an "S".)

So, basically, the only English word we can't use here is the one that starts with "F". Oh, and "ridicu_lous". We can't use that one either. Because, even though the English word "asshole" is not too vulgar to use here, the Spanish word for it IS.

Regards,
Trevor

ridickulous
On Thursday, August 31, I attempted to post a comment here in response to Michelle Malkin's column of the previous day. My post contained the word "ridicu_lous" (without the underscore). I have to spell it with an underscore, because, apparently, we can no longer use that word on the Town Hall forums. Why? Because "ridicu_lous" happens to contain the word "cu_lo" (again, without the underscore), which is Spanish for "ass" or "asshole", and may also refer to anal sex.

This word is so obscure (at least to non-Spanish speakers) that it took me all day to find out the meaning of it. Moreover, we are perfectly free to use "ass", "asshole", and "anal sex", IN ENGLISH, with no censorship. So why has Town Hall banned the use of an English word that is very common (especially when describing liberals and their ideas), just to prevent people using an obscure foreign word for a body part that we can easily refer to in English?

I asked the editors of townhall.com that question. That was 5 days ago and I have received no response. Therefore, I'm taking this fight to the streets, so to speak. I'm posting this message on every column that comes up, in hopes that others will join me in this quest to reclaim the right to use the word "ridicu_lous" in this forum.

I am not a vulgar person by nature, so it pains me to have to do this. But as an example of the ridicu_lousness of this ban on "cu_lo", I would like to list a few of the ENGLISH words that we can use freely here (I feel confident in this list, since, if any of these trigger a censor, the message will not post):

piss
twat
dick
pecker
ass
asshole
tit
tiddy
damn
hell

(There were four other words that I originally included in this list, but they were censored, apparently only because they occurred IN COMBINATION, implying that if I had used them separately, they would have been permitted. Two of these referred to the primary female reproductive organ and began with a "C" and a "P", respectively. Another referred to the primary male reproductive organ and began with a "C". The fourth word referred to feces and began with an "S".)

So, basically, the only English word we can't use here is the one that starts with "F". Oh, and "ridicu_lous". We can't use that one either. Because, even though the English word "asshole" is not too vulgar to use here, the Spanish word for it IS.

Regards,
Trevor

sedonaman
sedonaman writes: Tuesday, September, 05, 2006 9:32 AM
I’ve been a supporter of FIRE for several years, and one thing I’ve noticed is whenever it wins a case in court against University “X” for their anti-free-speech speech code, they have to go fight University “Y” for the same violation.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
It applies to a lot of areas of academia. I am a Michigan Graduate and was horrified several years ago when they fought tooth and nail to defend an obviously racist Admission Policy. I dropped out of the Alumni Group and stopped donating money (full disclosure is the most I ever gave was $500 toward a building fund one year and most years it was $100 so their lifestyle didn't change much due to my actions). My point was that once you are challenged, you have to rethink your policy and reform it, if any thinking adult is in charge. The next year when they called me for a donation, I explained that I could not support a racist institution. After explaining what I meant she told me that Affirmative Action was important--it is probably what got her into school. She never thought about who didn't get in because she did. We are raising a selfish generation. Actually as a baby boomer I am a member of a selfish generation.

Christians everywhere should be ashamed
I do beleive that Christians everywhere should be ashamed of thmselves.

Jesus said that all a Christians need is the faith of a mustard seed. Yet so many of us fall so short.

Liberals, on the other hand, clearly have the faith of an avacado pit. No amount of evidence, no amount of failure, no amount of contradiction will shake their faith.

This is why they do not and will never give up, and why they will never get it.


draft dodgers
Universities are staffed and run by '60s era draft dodgers. They're still trying to justify their contempt for their country.

Names Mix-Up
Apologies to all for getting the names backwards.

That's a terrible mistake to make.

Goodness knows Professor Kershnar has been through enough without idiots like me scanning too quickly back through the article and making that kind of obvious mistake.


"Speech Codes" and the military
"...challenged the politically correct student conduct and affirmative action policies..." If you think that speech codes are limited to conventional academia, you might be surprised to learn that criticizing "affirmative action" policies practiced by the military (specifically admission to the four military service academies) will guarantee a swift end to your career. Why? Apparently today said military academies exist only to provide career opportunities to "deserving" upon otherwise under qualified females & hyphenated Americans- not to provide the best professional officers that form the core of the military leadership that is supposed to be defending this country. Diversity! Diversity! "Diversity for diversity's sake" is the idiotic mantra that the left has managed to impose upon the military services.

Phylo,
he was saying that the accusation was an opinion. Like if I said, "Phylo doesn't distinguish between fact and opinion." That's really just my opinion. It would have been better for Hefner to counter with facts. You said, "x," but the fact is "y." Perhaps it was a poorly worded sentence.

huh?
I'm not particularly interested in this article overall because I don't have any context, but the following sentence by Mike Adams caught my attention:

"Apparently, Hefner does not understand that such accusations of failure to differentiate between fact and opinion are not facts but, rather, opinions."

Doesn't this mean that, essentially, there are no facts? Doesn't it mean that you can ignore the facts, spout your opinion, and then, when someone accuses you of ignoring the facts, you just say "Well, that's just your opinion."

This guy doesn't sound like a very clear thinker to me.

Phylo out.


They NEVER get it.
As Ann Coulter says, liberals never give up.

I’ve been a supporter of FIRE for several years, and one thing I’ve noticed is whenever it wins a case in court against University “X” for their anti-free-speech speech code, they have to go fight University “Y” for the same violation.

Academia’s defiance of the law is unprecedented, especially if the institution is a public one. See how academia has been, and still is, fighting TOOTH AND NAIL to circumvent the will of the people - TEN YEARS after the voters passed Proposition 209 in 1996 to end race-based affirmative action. http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/senate/committees/ucaad/ucaad.12.10.04.minutes.pdf.


Someone should be indicted. Then the rest MIGHT get it.

The iron fist of the left
Why people ever think liberals are interested in free speech is beyond me. They are interested in their free speech. Liberals have always seen the utility in crushing the opposition. This inclination is not much demonstrated while in a minority, but now that the have almost taken over the country, they are starting to show their true colors. Fascism was always a political movement of the left.

I agree
F.I.R.E. Him

Protected not defended
It shows the emptiness of the liberal university professors and staff that they have to be protected by speech codes and actions like this. Why? Because their ideas can't be defended. Why do educated people adopt these positions? I think laziness. Like liberals everywhere they want to say things that make them seem "cool". It would be too much work to spout the truth and then defend it. They will lose their seat at the cool kids table. And they were--and many still are--so wrong about socialism and communism, that they can't afford to admit being wrong again. Part of their problem is the disservice they do to those they bring in under the guise of diversity. They end up with all colors and genders of students who all think alike and thus never challenge their ideas. They become stuck in this 'monoversity'. It's a tyranny for sure and we are fortunate to have FIRE to fight it.

Liberal ideas are so indefensible that one of the best things that could happen for conservative ideas would be for Air America to get more play. The mindset of their hosts would frighten the average citizen. Alas, it is so poorly done and uninteresting that more exposure is unlikely. Even here in Boston, the channel is os weak that you can't pull it in. I only can listen and laugh while travelling in smaller towns.

Gurky
What sarcasm? The difference between fact and opinion is an opinion. That's a fact :).

Great column,
if a little short. Universities. Up is down in their world. It's amazing how much things have changed in a relatively short period of time.

This is the Mike Adams I like
Taking on the politically correct system. Well done Mike.

Freedom of Speach
Never confuse the issues with facts, or even opinions. Remeber, the President might not always be right, but he is always the president.

The old saying keeps coming back to me, power corrupts, absolute power corruptss absolutely. The president refuses to let anyone challenge his "opinions" as he feels his opinions are the facts.

Mike, I enjoy your sarcasm, however, this paper does not need any.


For clarity's sake . .
surely it is Hefner, not Kershnar that is deserving of your ire, people! Kershnar is the Prof, Hefner the administrator! Kershnar: good! Hefner : Baaad!!

And, FIRE : Goood!

Now, having read Godless, who's with me for eliminating Darwinism from American curricula?! I thought the ACLU should be asked to do it, but FIRE will probably be our only hope! I'm not talking about inserting ID, just eliminating the oft disproven Origin of the Species. I would certainly like Mike's input on the subject!

Petty Tyrants
The world is full of them.

Contacts
It seems to me that if someone wanted to call for Kershnar to lose his job, the SUNY senior administration (supervising all SUNY campuses) would be the place to go.

These are the people who occupy those offices:

http://www.suny.edu/System_Administration/system_administration.cfm?navLevel=2

Its a shame
That there are people, especially in a universoty, who so willingly censor those they do not agree with.

So much for honest debate.

Phone #s, e-mail addresses
Mike - I agree with you.
However, your providing subject information seems like you're trying to flood the wrong-doer with unsolicited calls and messages, creating havoc on phone lines and servers.
I'm sure you get that all the time, but it's not a gentleman's tactic.
Sincerely,
David

I think we should all thank FIRE
Because without the Foundation of Individual Rights in Education where would we all be?

They do a magnificent job.

THANK YOU F.I.R.E. !

More Support
Ditto Supporting. And can the President or his Director of Media Relations produce and lay side-by-side the two applications? Maybe the President needs to take his Director of Media Relations with him? What does Professor Kershnar say about the re-application?

If you want to hang someone like this out to dry, do it like you would capture a woodchuck and fill in the escape route. That is, report on the rebutting arguments as to whether facts support it or not.

To professorj
Well, you can still write to him. If you think that using one's position to deny promotions to people with different political believes is wrong - write to the jerk who does it. Express your disgust (if that's what you feel).

Because it sounds like your academia has the same kind of freedom that existed in the USSR: you are free to have any political opinion, as long as it is the latest version of marxism-leninism, as defined by the latest guidelines from Politburo. Everything outside of it is opportunistic, shovinistic, capitalist propaganda, and you are the enemy of the people for expressing it.

Supporting
But if we support your argument and want to contact someone, wouldn't it be the Fredonia Board of Trustees, rather than Kershnar?

We can express our opinion of him directly to him, but he likely won't fire himself.

Or is the goal to encourage him to resign?

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.