Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Michelle Malkin :: Townhall.com Columnist
Obama's AmeriCrooks and Cronies Scandal
by Michelle Malkin
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



President Obama promised he would end "Washington games." But his abrupt firing of the AmeriCorps inspector general is more of the same. The brewing scandal smells like the Beltway cronyism of the Bush years. And the apparent meddling of first lady Michelle Obama in the matter smacks of the corruption of the Clinton years.

If Obama keeps up with this "change," we'll be back to the Watergate era by Christmas.

News of AmeriCorps watchdog Gerald Walpin's unceremonious dismissal first broke last week in Youth Today, an independent national publication focused on the volunteerism sector. Walpin was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 and has served well, honorably and effectively. Too effectively. His removal came a week after he "questioned the eligibility of the largest and most expensive AmeriCorps program, and while the IG was contesting the 'propriety' of a settlement made with a mayor for alleged misuse of AmeriCorps funds," according to Youth Today.

*** Special Offer ***

The first taxpayer-subsidized program is the Teaching Fellows Program, run by the Research Foundation of the City University of New York. Walpin's audit -- which can be found online at www.cncsig.gov/AuditReports.html -- uncovered a multitude of grant violations, including criminal background check lapses and "pervasive problems of eligibility, timekeeping and documentation."

Walpin's office questioned duplicate educational awards of more than $16 million and costs worth nearly $775,000. CUNY refused to return excess funds that it had drawn down, failed to revise procedures to prevent such grant abuse and refused to provide proof documenting that its AmeriCorps participants actually existed. Walpin advised AmeriCorps' parent organization, the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), to cut off any new funding and re-examine past government funding totaling upward of $75 million.

CNCS, now chaired by Democratic mega-fundraiser Alan Solomont, has ignored Walpin's recommendations. The Obama watchdogs are snoozing. Expect the same kind of lackadaisical approach toward policing the $6 billion AmeriCorps expansion and new national service bill signed into law by Obama in April.

The second program Walpin challenged is the nonprofit St. HOPE Academy, run by Obama supporter Kevin Johnson, the Democratic mayor of Sacramento and a former NBA basketball star. In a special May 2009 report, Walpin's office blew the whistle on a highly politicized U.S. attorney's office settlement with Johnson and his deputy, Dana Gonzalez. The pair exploited nearly $900,000 in AmeriCorps funding for personal and political gain. Based on Walpin's investigation last year, CNCS suspended their access to federal funds after determining that they were:

-- Using AmeriCorps members to "recruit students for St. HOPE Academy";

-- Using AmeriCorps members for political activities in connection with the "Sacramento board of education election";

-- Assigning grant-funded AmeriCorps members to perform services "personally benefiting … Johnson," such as "driving (him) to personal appointments, washing (his) car and running personal errands"; and

-- Improperly using AmeriCorps "members to perform non-AmeriCorps clerical and other services" that "were outside the scope of the grant and therefore were impermissible" for "the benefit of St. HOPE."

But in the wake of Johnson's mayoral victory and Obama's election in November, the U.S. attorney's office in Sacramento rushed to settle with the new mayor so he could avail himself of federal stimulus funds and other government money. It was, Walpin said in his special report last month, "akin to deciding that, while one should not put a fox in a small chicken coop, it is fine to do so in a large chicken coop! The settlement … leaves the unmistakable impression that relief from a suspension can be bought."

Shortly after, the White House announced that it had "lost confidence" in Walpin. With Walpin's removal, the top management positions at CNCS are now open. The decks are clear to install lackeys who will protect the government volunteerism industry and its Democratic cronies. And a chilling effect has undoubtedly taken hold in every other inspector general's office in Washington.

GOP Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa is pressing Obama for more details. Tough questions need to be asked of the first lady, who has "taken the lead" in selecting AmeriCorps' managers, according to Youth Today. Her former chief of staff, Jackie Norris, will serve as a "senior adviser" to CNCS beginning next week. What role did they play in Walpin's sacking? And why?

Mrs. Obama's interest is more than passing. She ran the AmeriCorps-funded nonprofit Public Allies in Chicago from 1993-1996 and served on its national board until 2001. Like so many of the AmeriCorps recipients investigated by the inspector general's office over the years, Public Allies was found to have violated basic eligibility and compliance rules. A January 2007 audit reported that the group lacked internal controls verifying that recipients of education grants and living allowances were legal citizens or permanent residents as required by law.

Transparency. Accountability. Fiscal responsibility. In Obama World, these are proving to be nothing more than words. Just words.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Michelle Malkin makes news and waves with a unique combination of investigative journalism and incisive commentary. She is the author of Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild .

Be the first to read Michelle Malkin's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Chicago Politics = Thuggery
The political world has not treated the American public well over the last 20 years. When 98% of politicians seek office for personal gain and aggrandizement, our body politic cannot help but suffer. Furthermore, when an incumbent administration has an ideological bent and reach which undercuts our economic foundation, weakens our currency, and jeopardizes our economic strength and potential in our relations with other countries, it is time to rethink the process which puts such people in power. Our educational system in elementary and high school has been dumbed down significantly in the past 35 years. We are now paying the price for this foolishness because the ideologues within the system indoctrinate as well as teach. If we are to remain the country which propelled us to world prominence in less than 200 short years, we must rethink education as a tool to properly inform our young of the qualities which our founding fathers so correctly prized as they created our system. We have been found seriously wanting. It is time to act before our country becomes so seriously compromised that it forgets the path which made us great.

Experience Matters, Michelle has it!
"Mrs. Obama's interest is more than passing. She ran the AmeriCorps-funded nonprofit Public Allies in Chicago from 1993-1996 and served on its national board until 2001".

As a First Lady, she can use her experience to assist in developing/implementing programs - as long as SHE HAS PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE.

Michelle is different than Mrs. Clinton who undertook healthcare without prior healthcare program development experience. Michelle has worked with socio-economically disadvantaged students/people who benefit from these programs.

As the wife of a community organizer in chief - she is well qualified to take A LEADING ROLE in hiring the staff and using her past experience to shape the agenda for these programs.

I am guessing that the IG was on a witch hunt and was bringing down the team morale by being divisive. As a result, he was given his walking papers. What do you want Michelle? For Michelle and Obama to get stuck with partisan hacks? The IG is not that kosher, his first stop was Glen Beck, and that in itself gives the impression HE IS VERY PARTISAN.

Whooaaa whoooaaaa Obama is like Bush - I thought you guys loved Bush. What is the problem?

Reply to "Left Angle"
Sorry to be late to the party. However, here's your answer:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124511811033017539.html

Please read. Note the law that Obama violated was one he was co-sponsor on. See the following paragraph:

"That's because last year Congress passed the Inspectors General Reform Act, which requires the President to give Congress 30 days notice, plus a reason, before firing an inspector general. A co-sponsor of that bill was none other than Senator Obama."

Now, notice--Congress was not notified. The IG in question was given one hour's notice, not 30 days. Mr. Obama violated "his own law".

That's the law he violated, sir.

As to your extremely facetious statement about pressuring GOP congressmen/senators for an investigation, others have noted that it seems very likely the Congressional Democrats will simply close ranks behind Mr. Obama and block any investigation. Again--in the House of Representatives, speaker Pelosi can easily block all action with a simple majority. In the Senate, with 60 seats now Democratic, the minority is again reduced to irrelevance.

Your further comments about "to the victors go the spoils" are frankly schizophrenic. Wasn't it speaker Pelosi who stated she would lead the most ethical Congress in history? Others have also pointed out that Mr. Obama promised transparency and accountability. Your comments about the ancient "spoils system" are directly antithetical to these promises of ethical behavior by elected Democratic officials.

Don't you want to support your elected officials? Then, support them by demanding they live up to their promises.

Washington games vs Chicago games
He did what he said he would do, he ended Washington games and instituted Chicago games. That was his implementation of Change.

Not The Lead Story On The Evening News
Just in case you're wondering why the national media hasn't picked this up, this from today's American Spectator blog:
"Posted by Matthew Vadum on 6.17.09 @ 10:50PM

It makes perfect sense that President Obama has appointed left-wing newsman Tom Brokaw to the 2009-2010 President's Commission on White House Fellowships.

Of course Brokaw's ties to ACORN aren't nearly as strong as the president's, but he's definitely in the same ideological camp."
'Nuff said!

ME
Yes, I confess I am an alcoholic. Again, this has nothing to do with the topic! By the way, for those who don't have specific medical training, the terms "confused" and "disoriented" have very specific medical definitions, especially to a neuroligist! IT'S JUST A COINCIDENCE THAT THOSE TERMS, WHICH WERE APPLIED TO ME HAVE COME UP IN AN EXPLANATION FOR SOMEONE'S BEHAVIOR AT A MEETING WHO IS IN COMPLETE DENIAL!

The GOP wants $$-I'm about to show it!
It's sickening when my own reps don't listen. I've emailed them and they have responded but only to mouth Pres. Obama'a agenda.

I plan to go door to door if need be to ensure that this so-called representative gov't doesn't hold seats. I'm sick of it.

You can't go to Yahoo on the weekend w/o liberal spin. AOL is nearly as bad. I usually pay attention to AP and Foxnews reports but there is no trudging through the CNBC, MSNBS, ABC, CBS, even lately Al Jazira. This is what mainstream America get and they don't go beyond these articles. Mostly touting Obama scolding Republicans for getting in his way.

News flash: They are doing the job their constituents voted them to do!

Are these fpptprints on our backs?
Why yes! They are.

When I e-mailed the Senator who represents my district, my Congressman, the president himself to caution them that I do not appreciate votes and measures made to take away my freedoms and limit my parents when they retire, I got the presidents' reform package (healthcare, military, education, economy). At least in my state I KNOW my all my representatives are toadies.

This is a petty issue...
and it shows the pettiness of right wingers and
their contempt for a duly elected potus in prez obama. the goal of the right wing here is to find anything and I mean anything to overturn
the results of the last potus election. sorry guys that isnt going to happen, not on this bs anyway by a long shot. you guys are delusional in thinking so. Try winning some elections in 2010 and 2012. You know: thru the system.

Baradiel
Cute--since you are so smart, I'm surprised that you haven't published the answer to this mystery. The mystery is why the board which he was a part of agrees that he should be fired and why Republicans who might have heard what really is going on are not leaping to his defense. Well, this s Completely Unrelated but supervisors once talked about me in terms s8ch as "disoriented" when much of the time I was extremely rational. I guess it was fear of lawsuits in oUr litigious society that had had them talking in code. Fortunately, for me, and for the rest of the human race, I found a friend named Bill W. who stopped me from engaging in total denial (including lying to others) and I am much happier now. AS I PREVIOUSLY SAID, THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC OTHER THAN I NOTICED SUPERVISORS TALKING IN CODE ABOUT WHAT THE PROBLEM MIGHT BE WITH ME.

I suspect that if
conservatives had something interesting and important to talk about, all of these endless brain-dead, un-clever insults would lose their endless fascination.

sdeakins: KY
Man that's good, I like your sense of Humor. Fact is the Obama is no joke, he is either the Most Radical Leftist to be elected President or just a very Idealistic Naive Punk, take your pick.

Why is everyone picking on ...
... the Obama? Can't we just let him do whatever he wants to? It will relieve our collective racial guilt, it will impower us toward 3rd world status, it will be social justice, it will bring the world together with a coke. Can't we just all get along? Oh..the humanity...the humanity. Do it for the children or the polar bears for the polar bears are our future or is that the children?

So what else is new?
We already know that liberals/progressives/communists are gangsters.

haha
obama kill

No eggs
Mr. Obama acted in direct conflict with the law he himself put in place.
My questions are, If he had good cause to terminate this man, Why was he compelled to act so quickly, And without notifying congress ?

They're can only be two possible answers IMO.

1). He did not believe he would have the support of congress.
2). The speed with which he acted is because there is more here than meets the eye.
And he moved quickly to minimalize inquiry.

And to fire a man who has dedicated the better part of his life to civil service. And his latter years at that, On the phone ?

Where are the NADS of our elected officials ???

OBAMA VS WALPIN
MONITORING ALL THAT HAS BEEN DONE 'WRONG' OVER THE PAST MORE THAN 100 DAYS TAKING TO WHAT WILLIAM SHATNER WOULD SAY, "TO BOLDLY GO WHERE NO MAN HAS GONE BEFORE" THAT WE SHOULD CALL FOR

"IMPEACHMENT" PRECEEDINGS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BEFORE HE GETS US DEEPER, IF THAT CAN BE POSSIBLE... WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS GUY... I DON'T LIKE THE DIRECTION HE IS TAKING US IN BECAUSING IT IS GOING FURTHER DOWN INSTEAD OF GOING UP... BUT MAYBE THAT IS JUST HIS INTENTION...

WHAT IS TRULY ON THIS MANS AGENDA??? I THINK IT IS NOT THE WELFARE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OR THE FUTURE OF AMERICA BEING BROUGHT BACK TO THE COUNTRY OF GREAT MIGHT IT ONCE WAS...

Yes, cut and paste from Wikipedia...
Fascism, pronounced /'fæ??z?m/, comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
Fascists advocate the creation of a single-party state
Fascists believe that nations and/or races are in perpetual conflict whereby only the strong can survive by being healthy, vital, and by asserting themselves in combat against the weak.
Fascist governments forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government and the fascist movement.
Fascism opposes class conflict, blames capitalist liberal democracies for its creation and communists for exploiting the concept.
Fascism is much defined by what it opposes, what scholars call the fascist negations - its opposition to individualism, rationalism, liberalism, conservatism, capitalism, and communism.
In the economic sphere, many fascist leaders have claimed to support a "Third Way" in economic policy, which they believed superior to both the rampant individualism of unrestrained capitalism and the severe control of state communism. This was to be achieved by a form of government control over business and labour (called "the corporate state" by Mussolini).
No common and concise definition exists for fascism and historians and political scientists disagree on what should be in any concise definition.

Firing of Walpin
It sounds like to me that president Obama speaks out of both sides of his mouth. It is okay to investigate and find something out on Republicans, or other's not affliated with Him in any way, but forbid anyone investigating or bringing to attention CROOKS that steal from Governement Funds... Could it be that there is a coverup? Could it be that a seceret avenue of funding that could LEAD TO GOD KNOWS WHERE witin His Campaign funding (maybe) in question? Could it be brought out to the Public? I say that Mr. Walpin should be given His job back, that Obama should have this avenue investigated BY SOURCES OTHER THAN HIS WIFE SO TO INSURE THERE IS NO (PAPERWORK THAT BECOMES MISSING) DOES THAT SOUND LIKE A REPEAT??? And to show He is truly Transparent and against Greed and Crooked Dealing and Abuse of Federal Funds. Should these reports be found out to be as Walpin found them to be, Obama should give a public apology to Mr.Walpin, PERIOD!!! Should there be findings leading to any CORRUPTION NO MATTER WHERE IT LEADS, THOSE THAT ARE INVOLVED DIRECTLY OR BENEFITED SO OR INDIRECTLY SHOULD BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST! OR COULD WE POSSIBLY FIND ANOTHER BODY IN THE PARK DEAD OF A HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE SUSICDE?!

343 comments
Probably lots more by now and I read a hundred or so on another thread, quite a few by Mizzbizz. I can only hope her comprehension skills exceed her communication skills. Otherwise the many replies were in vain.

Stipulating that Obama is very bad, I am not pessimistic. I believe that most of the damage he can do will be to himself and to the Democratic Party. I believe the trolls and the mainstream media recognize this as well. That is much of the reason for their stridency and defensiveness.

Where George Bush was the most sucessful was in the areas where he freed this country to be the best it could be. Obama can damage this country but he will not be able to destroy its greatness.


Protected by the Race Card/Syncophants
"With Walpin's removal, the top management positions at CNCS are now open. The decks are clear to install lackeys who will protect the government volunteerism industry and its Democratic cronies. And a chilling effect has undoubtedly taken hold in every other inspector general's office in Washington."

Walpin DOES HIS JOB WITH INTEGRITY and the WH 'loses confidence.' But of course! THEY WILL NOT SUFFER ANYONE TO STOP THEM from pillaging and destroying America! EVERY FREAKIN DAY there's new exposures/evidences of Obama's deception about who he is and what his agenda is - he's a FAKE, A LIAR, and a CON MAN. He's corrupt! He's treasonous! I am so ANGRY at all the cronyism, corruption, enabling, and lack of outrage/courage to oppose it! WHAT CAN BE DONE TO STOP THIS?! Throughout the entire system, all the protectors are in place to keep the cronies safe and free to rob taxpayers and bring America DOWN. That 'old white man' Walpin is NOT supposed to do his proper job and expose crooks/scammers like that! so he's Gotta Go...

Obama is like a maniacal steamroller! He gave plenty of clues in his books, his associations WERE meaningful to his ideology, his critics were NOT racists, but discerners of reality & they have been ABUNDANTLY VINDICATED IN SUCH A SHORT TIME! Sadly, not enough people LISTENED OR CARED! CURSES ON ALL THE STUPID GULLIBLE IDIOTS WHO FELL FOR HIS CON AND PUT HIM INTO POWER!!! SATAN MUST BE SOOOOO PLEASED!

Baradiel-AZ
U say "racism is alive and well" and "at least we have an honest lib". I certainly agree the first statement is TRUE!! I have a small problem with the last one though.. Mike calls himself "a person of color". I find that to be a totally WISHY-WASHY word..Does that mean Black, Colored, Yellow, Red?? I always thought that to be an archaic British word originally in use to describe residents of India, Asia and other colonies.. But if a person LIKES that title, then wear it> CHEERS

Channeling Hannan
Weakness at home leads to weakness abroad...



"You cannot spend your way out of a recession or borrow your way out of debt. And when you repeat, in that wooden and perfunctory way, that our situation is better than others, that we are well placed to weather the storm, I have to tell you, you sound like a Brezhnev era apparatchik giving the party line. You know and we know and you know that we know that it's nonsense. Everyone knows that we are possibly worse off than at any other moment in our history as we go into these hard times. The world has said so. Our people have said so. The Chinese have said so as we monetize our money or, as Mr. Geithner would say, we use quantitative easing, which all others except you recognize to be monetization. The Germans, the French, the Russians, and Pravda have all but said so. The value of our dollar says so, which is why it is falling like a rock. In a 18 months, the voters will have their chance to say so, too. They can see what the fundamentals say and what those not drinking the Kool-Aid have seen all along: that you are the devalued Leader of a devalued Government."

- Paraphasing Daniel Hannan, MEP

08hayabusa: you present SOME truth
Leo Denofrio has, however, dropped out of the BC controversey.

The major players right now on the BC issue are Dr. Orly Taitz, Phil Berg, the USJF, and World Net Daily.

It is good that you have posted what you did, but try not to discourage others from discussing this issue on TH or other similar places.

We are already being shut down by the MSM.

If you are active, in this cause as I am, you would know this.

WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

VISIT http://WWW.WORLDNETDAILY.COM to find out.

USPatriot56

What did you expect
A socialist is a socialist,and a Democrat. Presbo will get away with anything because the lamestream media will not question him on anything , or his lackeys either. The liberal congress will not call for an investigation and/or an independent council.
The newspapers are going out of business because they wanted him to win so bad that they won't print the truth.It makes me sick to hear the news on t.v.
The bad thing is we still have at least three and a half more years of this B.S.

You're right, mike.
Racism is alive and well in the US. 95 percent or so of blacks voted for Obama, yet couldn't tell you the first thing about his policies. He has also nominated to the supreme court a woman who thinks that her Latina heritage makes her more qualified than a white man.

You are absolutely right mike, racism is alive and well.

At least we have an honest lib.

Baron in WA
Actually, I think I may have used misleading language in my post thanking you for your service. When I said, "they remind all of us who haven't been put in the position of having to put one's very life on the life for one's country (a group that includes myself)", the "group that includes myself" is those Americans who HAVEN'T worn the uniform of our country.

My DAD was a 20-year Navy man - but I must admit to being a lifelong civilian. But as someone from a military family, I deeply appreciate those who have made the sacrifices they have in the uniform of our armed forces for the blessings I enjoy today in America. If Hal Donahue didn't snipe on this board at other veterans, I'd even thank him for HIS service - but his Kerryish attitude toward his fellow servicemen make him, as far as I'm concerned, a modern-day Benedict Arnold.

Obama is a usuper
Here is what the father of the 14th Amendment had to say a natural born citizen was.

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirms the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:

[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]

Notice he said citizens (PLURAL) not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty. Obama's father wasn't even an American citizen and he definitely owed allegiance to a foreign sovereignty by being a British subject, which by the way made Obama a dual citizen at birth by the British act of 1948.

He is not a natural born citizen.

Will "Pay-Go" Really Pay?
With his first two federal budgets projecting the largest deficits in U.S. history, each above a trillion dollars, Mr. Obama wants to be seen speaking the gospel of fiscal discipline and distancing himself from the free-spending ways of Congress, of which he was a member for four years.

With his first two federal budgets projecting the largest deficits in U.S. history, each above a trillion dollars, Mr. Obama wants to be seen speaking the gospel of fiscal discipline and distancing himself from the free-spending ways of Congress, of which he was a member for four years.

“Paying for what you spend is basic common sense. Perhaps that's why, here in Washington, it's been so elusive,” he needled an audience in the East Room this afternoon that included some House members.

But briefing reporters, White House Budget Director Peter Orszag conceded some of PAYGO’s limitations. It doesn’t cover discretionary spending.

“PAYGO only applies to the mandatory side of the budget and to revenue,” said Orszag. That means entitlement programs such as Medicare and revenue programs like taxes. It’ll cover the compulsory health care plan the president wants Congress to pass – but over five or 10 years. In a single year, the plan may exceed PAYGO limits.

It will not covered the "public option" of Obama Care.

In addition, about 40 percent of the federal budget, programs for education, energy, the military, etc., would not be covered by PAYGO, said Orszag. A different set of Senate and House rules apply to those programs, he said.


http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/09/politics/politicalh otsheet/entry5076078.shtml


More for mike in WA (Part 2)
Mr. Walpin told the Times that a standing audit committee of the agency's board – consisting of chairman Alan Solomont, Vice Chairman Steven Goldsmith, and board member Eric Tanenblatt – lightly questioned the arrangement at one meeting, but agreed to “let's see how it works.” After that, he said, “I never heard a whimper” of complaint about the arrangement from the board or anybody else. “I never heard an objection.”

Again, the witness largely corroborates his account. The witness was not at the original meeting with the audit committee, but attended several later full board meetings in which Mr. Walpin mentioned his telecommuting arrangement without a single objection being raised.

Furthermore, both Mr. Walpin and the independent witness said Mr. Walpin always was extremely accessible regardless of where he was working that day, and that the board never indicated otherwise. Independently, both volunteered that Mr. Walpin had made clear the telecommuting would last on a trial basis only through June anyway, at which time they would review the set-up to see how well it was working.

So much for Mr. Walpin “insisting” on telecommuting “over the objections of the Corporation's Board.”


You really are a piece of work, aren't you mike. You talk about how this guy refused to show up for work, and tell us what would happen to you if did that, and you completely (conveniently) leave out that the 'commute' was from NY to DC. You also leave out that Walpin 'resigned' because he didn't want to make the commute anymore, was convinced by colleagues and subordinates to stay and telecommute, and that THE DIRECTORS HAVE KNOWN ABOUT THIS ARRANGEMENT ALL ALONG and never had a problem with it.

And you have the HYPOCRISY to tell us cons about "a FEW FACTS" we might "like to know.

If you wish to "enjoy the commentary" try not to come off like a typical lib troll who tells only what he reads at HuffPo, Dailykos, or democratunderground.

How To Spend $1.2tn - VI
Obama Says He Will Restore Funding To The Community Development Block Grant Program. Returning CDBG Program Funding To FY 2000 Levels Would Require $2.447 Billion In Additional Spending Per Year, Equal To $9.788 Billion.Obama Has Proposed A Credit Card Rating System, To Be Implemented By The FTC. Obama Co-Sponsored Legislation That Proposed This Rating System, At A Cost Of $10 Million Per Year, Equal To $40 Million Over Four Years.

Obama Would Expand Loan Programs For Small Businesses, As Specified In The Small Business Lending Reauthorization And Improvements Act He Co-Sponsored. The Congressional Budget Office Estimated The Cost Of The Small Business Lending Reauthorization And Improvements Act Of 2007, A Bill Co-Sponsored By Obama, At $3.4 Billion Over Five Years; Equal To $680 Million Per Year And $2.72 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Would Assist High School Students With Obtaining Access To College-Level Courses. Obama Co-Sponsored Legislation To Achieve This, Which Authorizes $50 Million Per Year, $200 Million Over Four Years.

Obama is a usuper
The framers put that clause in our Constitution to prevent foreign influence in our Executive Branch of Government, because they were going to allow immigrants access to all other branches of government, so as not to create a second class citizenry. They wanted naturalized citizens to have all the rights and benefits as native born or natural born citizens, but at the same time realized the Executive Branch needed a Citizen that was completely devoted to the nation with absolutely no foreign influence, hence the natural born clause. This was only one of two posts in government that an immigrant, or their children if they were born before they became citizens, were not allowed to process. The other post is Vice President.

Everything that Obama is, is what the framers were afraid of. He has ties to many foreign entities and he cares little about America.

Leo Donofrio brought one of the cases, Donofrio v. Wells, that reached the US Supreme Court and was denied without comment, and helped prepare a second one, Wrotnowski v. Connecticut Secretary of State, that was also denied without comment, that came before the Court immediately after his case.

I don't need to tell you that you don't get a hearing before the full court without merit. Why these cases didn’t get a open court hearing is anybody’s guess. But the Supreme Court decided to punt rather than do the right thing.

So if you want to get involved I suggest you go to Leo's site to see how you can help.

Complaining about it on a blog does nothing.

And by the way, when he is found to be a usurper, every single thing he has done is completely null and void because he never was a legal President.

Now it makes clear why this man is moving so fast about everything he does, doesn’t it?

He claims to be a Constitutional Professor, he knows his time could be limited. He knows he is not natural born.

CONT.

Obama is a usuper
Folks,
You need to get off the birth certificate issue. The birth certificate is not important. The fact that his father was not an American citizen is! THAT IS WHY HE IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN! If you stay focused on the birth certificate, eventually he will produce one, forged or real , it doesn’t matter, and you will never be able to bring this issue up again.

The man is a usurper, and everyone needs to get involved to have U.S. bring a quo warranto suit in Washington D.C. on Obama's eligibility. Since he has been sworn in as President this is the only avenue left to us. He cannot be impeached unless he commits a crime in office. And only the US Attorney or the Attorney General have standing to bring suit on Obama’s eligibility. And don’t count on Attorney General Holden. Needless to say, he has a conflict of interest as Obama appointed him.

Leo Donofrio has done all the legal work. Check out how you can get involved at his website Natural born citizen.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Leo has researched in depth exactly what natural born citizen means.

It means you have to be born to American Citizens in the jurisdiction of the United States.

In other words, both your parents have to be naturalized before you are born, and you have to be born in the United States or one of it's territories.

Obama's father was a British subject at his birth, as Kenya was still one of Britain's colonies in 1961. That gives Obama dual citizenship at birth.

That means Obama is not a natural born citizen.


CONT.

How To Spend $1.2tn - V

Obama Would Close The "Doughnut Hole" In The Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Program. Based On Estimates From The Congressional Budget Office, Closing The "Doughnut Hole" Would Cost Approximately $39.18 Billion In The First Fiscal Year Of Obama's Administration; Equal To $156.72 Billion Over Four Years. "Closing It Would Roughly Double The Cost Of The Medicare Prescription Drug Program, However, And Obama Offers No Way To Pay For It."

Obama Would Repeal The Social Security Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) And Government Pension Offset (GPO). Eliminating The WEP Would Cost $32.7 Billion Over 10 Years; Equal To $3.27 Billion A Year And $13.08 Billion Over Four Years. Eliminating The GPO Would Cost $38.1 Billion Over 10 Years; Equal To $3.81 Billion A Year And $15.24 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Would Implement The Lugar-Obama Legislation To Crack Down On The Smuggling Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction. According To The Congressional Budget Office, Implementing The Lugar-Obama Legislation (S. 2566) Would Cost $2.2 Billion Over Five Years, Which Averages Out To $440 Million Per Year And $1.76 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Has Proposed Creating "A National Network Of Public-Private Business Incubators" At A Cost Of $250 Million Per Year; Equal To $1 Billion Over Four Years.

More for mike in WA (Part 1)
The Washington Times claims to have gotten the following information from a "witness" who still works at CNCS and therefor asked to speak anonymously.

From Eisen's letter attempting to justify Walpin's firing.

“We further learned that Mr. Walpin had been absent from the Corporation's headquarters, insisting upon working form his home in New York over the objections of the Corporation's Board.”

From Wa Times:


Mr. Walpin disputes these statements, as might be expected. But now, in a Washington Times exclusive, so does another official who was a first-hand witness at several of the key meetings involved. The witness, whose bona fides are unimpeachable, is on the agency's payroll, and thus spoke on grounds of anonymity. The Washington Times contacted him through our own research, without Mr. Walpin's knowledge or suggestion.

In January, Mr. Walpin, 77, informed then-President George W. Bush's administration that he would be resigning his post, largely because he and his wife of 52 years had tired of his weekly commute away from his home with her in New York to the offices in Washington, D.C. He claims, and others confirm, that several career staff members subsequently talked him out of resigning, saying that they were proud of the work they were doing under him, and that they suggested he could often just telecommute from New York.

When he accepted their pleading and decided to stay, one staff member told the Times today, “Everybody was pleased. He really had taken charge of the office and gave it a sense of mission that everybody felt proud of.”

A witness at a subsequent meeting among Mr. Walpin and the agency's general counsel, Frank Trinity, and acting CEO, Nicola Goren, confirms Mr. Walpin's account – namely, that Mr. Trinity and Ms. Goren said they had no objection to the telecommuting arrangement and that (in Mr. Walpin's recounting of it) “there is no reason why it can't work.”

How To Spend $1.2tn - IV

Obama Would "Lead A Global Effort To Secure All Nuclear Weapons And Material At Vulnerable Sites Within Four Years." Obama Said This Could Be Funded By Ending The War In Iraq, At A Cost Of $10 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Proposes Doubling Funding For The Consumer Product Safety Commission. In FY 2008, The CPSC Was Funded At $80 Million. Doubling Funding Would Cost An Additional $80 Million Per Year, Equal To $320 Million Over Four Years.

Obama Has Proposed $2 Billion In Additional NASA Funding.

Obama Will Increase The Maximum Pell Grant To $5,400 And Ensure The Grant Keeps Pace With The Rising Cost Of College Inflation. The National Taxpayers Union Estimated This Would Cost $7.08 Billion Per Year, Equal To $28.32 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Would Spend $200 Million A Year To Develop "Regional Clusters" To Spur "Smart-Growth Strategies," Equal To $800 Million Over Four Years.

Obama Would Spend $5 Billion Over 10 Years To Protect And Restore The Great Lakes, Equal To $500 Million A Year And $2 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Would Increase PEPFAR Funding By $2 Billion.

How To Spend $1.2tn - III

Obama Would Provide $250 Million To "Bring Quality Teachers Back To The Gulf Region."

Obama Would Spend $1 Billion A Year In Autism-Related Funding By The End Of His First Term.

Obama Would Add "65,000 Soldiers To The Army And 27,000 Marines," Which Would Cost Approximately $11.04 Billion Per Year, Equal To $44.16 Billion Over Four Years. It Costs Approximately $1.2 Billion A Year For 10,000 Soldiers.

Obama Would Provide An Additional $1 Billion Per Year In Non-Military Assistance To Afghanistan, Equal To $4 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Plans To Implement Legislation That Would "Triple Non-Military Aid To The Pakistani People. It Would Authorize $7.5 Billion Over Five Years, An Increase Of Approximately $5 Billion In Spending, Equal To A $1 Billion Increase Per Year.

Obama Would Spend $5 Billion Over Three Years To Create A Shared Security Partnership.



How To Spend $1.2tn - II

Obama Would Double Federal Funding For Basic Research. According To The Congressional Research Service, Federal Basic Research Funding For FY 2007 Was $28.2 Billion; To Double This Funding Level Over Four Years Would Equal $112.8 Billion.

Obama Would Enact The Responsible Fatherhood And Healthy Families Act Which He Co-Sponsored. Obama's Responsible Fatherhood And Healthy Families Act Would Cost $528 Million Over Three Years.

Obama Supports Creating A National Catastrophe Fund, Similar To The One Passed By The House - Which Authorized $20 Million Per Year For The Fund; Equal To $80 Million Over Four Years.

Obama Would Spend $500 Million A Year For Religious Organizations To Help The Disadvantaged; Equal To $2 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Proposed Spending $90 Million A Year To Double The Manufacturing Extension Partnership; Equal To $360 Million Over Four Years.

Obama Proposed Creating $10 Billion In Additional Mortgage Revenue Bonds, At A Cost Of $50 Million To The Federal Government.

Obama Would Extend Trade Adjustment Assistance To Service Industries. The Cost Of Extending Trade Adjustment Assistance To Service Industry Workers Was Scored By The Congressional Budget Office At $2.5 Billion Over 10 Years; Equal To $250 Million Per Year And $1 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Would Double Funding For The Jobs Access And Reverse Commute (JARC) Program. According To The U.S. Federal Transit Administration, The JARC Program Was Authorized $156 Million In FY 2008; To Double JARC For Four Years Would Cost $624 Million.

Obama Supports Funding The National Science Foundation's Advanced Technological Education Program At $192 Million per year.

Obama Would Provide $25 Million A Year For States To Develop Early Assessment Programs To Increase College Readiness; Equal To $100 Million Over Four Years.


How To Spend $1.2tn - I

Obama's Second Stimulus Plan Includes $50 Billion For States And Infrastructure Projects.

Obama Will Provide Loans For Struggling Small Businesses At A Cost Of Approximately $5 Billion.

Obama Will Cover Loan Guarantees For The Auto Industry At A Cost Of Approximately $4 Billion.

Obama's Energy Plan Will Cost $150 Billion Over 10 Years, Equal To $15 Billion Annually And $60 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama's National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank Will Cost $60 Billion Over Ten Years; Equal To $6 Billion A Year And $24 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama's Early Education And K-12 Package Will Cost $18 Billion A Year; Equal To $72 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama's Home Foreclosure Prevention Fund Will Cost $10 Billion.

Obama's National Service Plan Will Cost $3.5 Billion A Year; Equal To $14 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama's Health Care Plan Will Cost $150 Billion; Equal To $600 Billion Over Four Years.

Obama Will Increase Foreign Assistance Funding By $25 Billion.

Obama Will Provide $2 Billion To Aid Iraqi Refugees.

Obama Will Provide $1.5 Billion To Help States Adopt Paid-Leave Systems.

Obama Will Provide $1 Billion Over 5 Years For Transitional Jobs And Career Pathway Programs, Equal To $200 Million A Year And $800 Million Over Four Years.

wiseone
Interesting commentary and I am quite open to looking further into it. You still didn't address the employee issues such as his refusing to report to work (and not work soley from home) when he was ordered to.

mike from WA
You're grasping at straws.

The US Attorney, Lawrence Brown, wanted to settle the case with Johnson. He was willing to give up the suspension and disbarment from handling future funds in return for a repayment from St. Hope (not Johnson, who misappropriated the money) of half the money, knowing full well that St. Hope is a bankrupt legal corporation that will never be able to pay the money back(except, possibly, with future gov't grants).

The comment about Walpin's reports being "oversimplified" were not even presented as grounds for firing him. It was a political doubletalk explanation/excuse Brown gave to rationalize going along with such a ridiculous settlement agreement.

It's plain as day what happened here. Millions in federal 'stimulus' money was going to be withheld from Sacramento if Walpin got his way, so he was asked to back off. When he refused he got fired.

The Obama administration is unconcerned about the fraud, waste, and cronyism committed by Johnson (as are you). The people of Sacramento knew (or should have known, as a warning appeared in the Sacramento Bee during the campaign) that they could lose this funding if they elected Johnson, but they elected him anyway.

And Congress doesn't give a hoot about the corruption either. Their noses are only out of joint because Obama didn't talk to them about firing Walpin before he did it.

And Brown? It wouldn't occur to you that Brown isn't going to buck the Obama Administration on anything. He is, as you point out, a Bush appointee. As such his on thin ice as it is, without giving Obama reason to can him, too.

Don't fool yourself.

Ms. Malkin on Racism
I am curious, as a person of color, I do believe that you must have noticed the incredible number of flagrant racists (like Beatle) and the others who speak "in code". Instead of looking for minutias to talk about so that you are always anti-Obama, why don't you dedicate one column about how racism is alive and well in this country? Oh, I forgot, that might take away your ability to make $$$ if you alienate "your crowd".

Dumb
can't you write about something else besides Obama.

NANCY
Where on earth do you get your info from? "A man of honor" who refuses direct orders from his supervisor to show up for work?! Which planet is your job located on? I am sure that when all of the dust settles there may be some type of mess he can point to and say "SEE" but it doesn't begin to explain his behavior. By the way, Ms. Malkin, he wasn't abruptly fired--as a civil servant he was offered the chance to resign honerably and only when he refused was he fired!

Dictatorship
When I was in school studying History I always wondered what it would be like to live in a country that had a Dictator. Now I know.

Albeit,thus far, it is a benevolent dictatorship. But Barry has almost 4 more years. If he gets reelected by the mindless minions that is 4 more.

How benevolent will it be in 2012? Hell...maybe by then our elections will be as legitimate as Iran's.

I call the White house hotline(202-456-1111) EVERY day.I call my Stupid DEMOCRAT Senators Benjamin Cardin and Barbara Mikulski, and my truly IDIOTIC congressman "Dutch" Ruppersberger so often the aides that answer recognize my voice!
I also call Pelosi, Reid, Boxer Feinstein,Durbin,Schumer, Menendez,Lautenberg, hell...,I call them all!

I urge all the posters here to do the same thing.The number for the Congressional switchboard is 202-224-3121. the operator will connect you to the D.C. office of any Senator or Congressman you ask for.Swamp them with negativity!

I know that some who post here are probably already calling......,but if you are a poster as angry as me about what is happening to this country under "SAUL ALINSKY'S RULES FOR RADICAL'S",and have not called, PLEASE flood the White House Comment Line and the congressional switchboard with your opinions about Barry Dunham's D.C.

I want to give a shoutout to the following nitwits. here they are; Proud American Democrat,Left Angle, Jillianeana,Tim,theone,Tupeorsueno(who posts like an illegal that hooked up with a computer),and MizzBizz ( who posts in such BUTCHERED English she must be a product of the D.C. Public school System).

ALL of you named are a danger to this nation because you vote.That's why you got the shoutout.There is absolutely NO excuse for your ignorance.Your posts are beyond stupidity. An amoeba could do better if he had hands to type!!!!!!






I'M NOT SURPRISED, ARE YOU?
Basically what Ole Jug Ears and that knuckle-dragging wife of his, Aunt Jemima - what they do is use their positions to be able to wrap their big, nasty lips and the big, nasty lips of their thug friends around the "honey barrel of the public trust". They're able to do this because their are enough braindead morons who voted them into office. No rocket science here.

katepatate

katepatate
Location: IN
Reply # 271
Date: Jun 17, 2009 - 4:10 PM EST Yakubu Kasavutu
Knew you were a leftist after reading your first sentence. First you have to call Michelle a nasty name and attack her personally. That is what all you leftists do. You, sir are a doofus and I will not respond again to anything you say. Look up doofus in the dictionary if you have one.

~~~

Sadly,

The troll will now think you like it, and that you were just teasing.

The trolls are mutant throwbacks to a Neanderthal mentality.

That is why the Cro Magnon Man, wiped them out and used them for vittles.

It is impossible to have a reasoned discourse with any troll.

Caveat: Ignore them or make fun of them.

DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT try to engage in any reasonable discourse with them.


After a few years visiting this site, I cannot remember a single soul who showed up with a reasonable opposing viewpoint.

Not saying their were NONE, but I cannot remember any that did.

I used to spoof many of them, in hopes they would see their idiocy, and retire.

Did not work. They are impervious to anything intelligent, or humorous, or insulting, AND, they get paid $ .10 per word by Georg Soros.

They get bonus points for hijacking a column.

Their arguments always revert to the third grade school yard bully version.

~~~

Some conservatives insist they have to refute the lies and idiocy.

O.K. I take a different stand. The vast majority of posters here fall into two groups. Those with brains, and those without.

I contend, that if every conservative would just simply ignore the trolls, they would lose interest, and move on.

Nothing, but nothing infuriates brat children like being ignored.

~~~

Ach du libre, You Hoosiers !

[ My family was here before 1800. ~ Rush County, later Madison, and Tipton Counties. Others in my extended family were here thousands of years earlier. ]






Searching for the Truth
The Inspector General does not serve at the pleasure of the President. Mr. Walpin needs our support. Try to find out anything you can on Alan Solomont (CNCS) and Kevin Johnson (St. Hope Academy) and report it here. We need a blast of sunlight to find the truth. Please bloggers help "We the People" find the truth. We have a man of honor and courage who needs us. The cockroaches do hate light and the press has gone to the "Dark Side." The Web is the light and we can shine that light on the corrupt who want to rule us.

standhisground: To answer your question
I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am not an "independent".

I am a patriot. I believe in the US Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and I believe that our nation, as founded, is a Democratic-Republic, NOT A DEMOCRACY.

I stand opposed to the globalists in both parties that are in cahoots with the international financiers who have hijacked our nation, and now are in the process of strangling the life out of this once great
nation.

I call for the end of the Federal Reserve System.

Yes. I would like to overturn the election results and hold a new election.

The fact is that Obama is NOT eligible to sit as POTUS.

HE is a usurper, who has gained power with the help of a corrupt media, a criminal political system, and an acquiescent court system that refuses to do its job and force Obama to produce his long-form birth certificate, his passport records, and his college transcripts.

If you want to get in on the battle to save America then visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com and start to learn the truth about this issue.

USPatriot56

STANDSHISGROUND,
I truly want to thank you sir, for such kind comments, and for your service to our country. I haven't told my story for many years, I was a little upset afterwards telling it again, But felt so driven to let Americans know, as you said best, Freedoms are not Free, never have been Free, and never will be Free, When you hear ignorant comments from people Like left Angle and his posse, that have know idea of what it has taken and how much Blood shed has been spent to have little things like freedoms of speech, that these nut job take for granted and abuse it just drives me battie, you just want to reach out and slap some since into them

standhisground: To answer your question
I am not a Republican or a Democrat. I am not an "independent".

I am a patriot. I believe in the US Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and I believe that our nation, as founded, is a Democratic-Republic, NOT A DEMOCRACY.

I stand opposed to the globalists in both parties that are in cahoots with the international financiers who have hijacked our nation, and now are in the process of strangling the life out of this once great
nation.

I call for the end of the Federal Reserve System.

Yes. I would like to overturn the election results and hold a new election.

The fact is that Obama is NOT eligible to sit as POTUS.

HE is a usurper, who has gained power with the help of a corrupt media, a criminal political system, and an acquiescent court system that refuses to do its job and force Obama to produce his long-form birth certificate, his passport records, and his college transcripts.

If you want to get in on the battle to save America then visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com and start to learn the truth about this issue.

USPatriot56

Birth Certificate
I don't know why Obama doesn't produce his birth certificate. He could buy one on any street corner in Los Angeles.

More for PAD
From American Conservative Daily:


"Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one of American largest grassroots immigration enforcement groups, issued national warnings about Shawna Forde and her key ally Jim Gilchrist of Minuteman Project months prior to her charges of double homicide in Arizona.

"“We knew there was something very wrong with Shawna Forde and did all in our power to forewarn groups and leaders ,as well as press and law enforcement, regarding our concerns,” said William Gheen of ALIPAC. “Shawna Forde does not reflect the immigration enforcement movement or the millions of Americans concerned about illegal immigration and border security.”

"ALIPAC issued national advisories and conducted a two hour radio broadcast warning about Shawna Forde and Jim Gilchrist, when the two tried to circulate photos and a story that Forde had been attacked and raped by a Latino gang in retaliation for her involvement in the immigration enforcement movement.

"ALIPAC leads the largest coalition effort among immigration enforcement groups in America and had only recently heard of Shawna Forde."


ALIPAC issued advisories on Forde and Gilchrist on Jan. 5, Feb. 24, and March 8 of this year.

Contrary to your accusation, Forde's alleged attack on Flores is a case of a conservative group's warning about a dangerous individual being on target. It's not about a conservative group (in this case ALIPAC or the Minutemen) breeding hatred and violent crime.

You should check all the facts before posting your drivel. Then you might be able to post facts instead of drivel.

How to force Obama to RESIGN
How to force Obama to RESIGN

Watch MOLOTOV MITCHELL explain what WE can do to get Obama to RESIGN:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId= 101291

USPatriot56

Chock Full O' Nuts
Wow, finally a tiny morsel that far-right wingers can believe they can sink their teeth into. Just a FEW FACTS that you might like to know: The U.S. Attorney who instigated the complaints against Mr. Walpin was and is a Republican Bush appointee. Arguing that the attorney serves under the president doesn't explain why he initiated the complaints or why he called Mr. Welpin's reports as being grossly "oversimplified", etc. It also doesn't explain why he continued to insist that he was going to work from home when he was ORDERED to show up for work. I don't know about you people, but when mysupervisor orders me to do something and I REFUSE I had better have some kind of outrageous reason in suport of myself. Also, you somehow, in your paranoia, fail to mention that there were numerous complaints against the gentleman, who says he was fired for being "diabled".

MSNBC Discusses The Birth Certificate
MSNBC Discusses The Birth Certificate

Go and see for your self.

Rachel Maddow does a report albeit a biased report about Obama's missing Birth Certificate.

It is worth a watch:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhuPw5WCO0A


USPatriot56

PAD
Re: Shawna Forde

You left a few things out (as usual).

From your same source:

"Pima County sheriff’s Lt. Michael O’Connor told reporters in Arizona that [the victim] Raul Flores had connections to Mexican drug cartels and his involvement was known to the Drug Enforcement Agency."

"Jim Gilchrist, president of the California-based Minuteman Project and a longtime Forde ally, said his group is separate and “we disassociate any affiliation between her, her organization and ours.”"

"Jeff Schwilk, founder of the San Diego Minutemen and an outspoken critic of Gilchrist, said he and others long ago recognized that Forde was unstable and dangerous. He said Gilchrist should have done the same."

Forde's ex-husband was shot (wounded, but survived) in his home in Everett, WA. Forde reported being raped in the same house a week later and was found with gunshot wounds in an alley 3 weeks later.

If Raul Flores was "homeless" what 'home' was he and his family staying in in Araveca?

Also, your source can't make up its mind whether a 3rd suspect (Albert Gaxiola) is also a member of Forde's group. In fact, your source provides no evidence of the existence of any such group beyond Forde and Bush, and provides only "auto theft" as Bush's criminal history. How does this make him a right-wing nut?

It's evident that the Minutemen, who use radios, not guns, recognized Forde as dangerous and disowned her.

It's equally apparent that Americans not involved in running drugs from Mexico had/have nothing to fear from Forde or her renegade 'group'.

But what's most obvious is the attempt to label the entire conservative movement as extreme based on any violent crime committed by anyone the left can claim has/had any association with any conservative group, even if their 'association' consists of being told they're not wanted because they're considered dangerous or otherwise repugnant.

Rowdy
What Rowdy said.