Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 06, 2009
Michael Reagan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Forget Bush, Not Reagan
by Michael Reagan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


If some media reports are correct -- a dangerous assumption nowadays when media skepticism has given way to unquestioned Obama worship -- former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush says the GOP needs to abandon nostalgia for the Reagan era.

I'm inclined to doubt the accuracy of that report since Jeb Bush was probably the best governor Florida ever had, and one who clung ferociously to the Republican principles exemplified by my father, Ronald Reagan.

Even if he did say something silly like that, my argument with him and Mitt Romney and the other participants in the so-called listening tour is not about my dad, but about the absurdity of a listening tour designed to tutor Republican bigwigs on what the public really wants from government,

My short answer to that question is that I want the government to get the hell out of our way and let us act like the free people our founding fathers wanted us to be, and not like subjects of an all-knowing, all-powerful federal government.

The listening tour is nothing but Republican gimmickry. The reality is that had they been listening over the past four years of the Bush presidency they would have seen the disaster of 2006 coming and they would have seen the catastrophe of 2008 coming.

Instead, they turned a deaf ear to the Republican conservatives not only on Capitol Hill, but to those out across America.

They lost in 2006 and 2008 because they stopped listening to the "nostalgia" for the conservative principles which guided my dad's administrations.

They receded backwards to the principle of losing elections, a habit that gripped the GOP until Newt Gingrich came along and showed them how to win congressional elections by standing for something, and my dad showed them how to win gubernatorial and presidential elections by championing the principles that made us the wealthiest and most-powerful nation in world history.

The lesson they taught was that you don't win elections by saying "me too," and trying to substitute a Republican version of big-government, wild-spending quasi-socialist agenda for a Democrat big-government, wild-spending quasi-socialist agenda.

Democrats know how to be socialists, Republicans don't. They can only try to imitate the real thing, so you end up as Benito Mussolini, half-socialist and half-capitalist, and not as Joe Stalin, socialist all the way to the death camps of Siberia.

If the GOP listeners want to know what the conservative majority among voters want and are thinking about, all they need to do is listen to Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and -- in all modesty -- Mike Reagan.

Our voices are the voice of the majority of Republican voters and open-minded independents. We don't have tens of millions of listeners every day because we have a message that contradicts the opinion of our audience -- we have such a vast army of listeners because they recognize that we are echoing their own opinions and telling them they are right in thinking as they do.

They recognize gimmicky when they see it. Watching TV this morning, I saw a pornography star who is running for the United States Senate announcing that she is on -- guess what -- a "listening tour," to learn if voters want her to make the run for Capitol Hill. It seems Republicans aren't the only ones using gimmickry these days.

If Republicans had really been listening, they'd still be in control of the House and Senate and there would be a Republican in the White House.

They didn't listen then, and they aren't listening now. If they start listening, what they'll hear is a demand that the Republican Party get back to the principles and beliefs embodied by Ronald Reagan, and get back to the principles of genuine conservatism which echo Thomas Jefferson's sage advice that a people who fear government cannot be free, but a government that fears the people is a government where the people are the masters and the state is their servant.

Finally, it isn't nostalgia for the Reagan era we need to forget, but the big government, wild-spending of Jeb Bush's brother George's administration.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Reagan, the eldest son of Ronald Reagan, is heard daily by over 5 million listeners via his nationally syndicated talk radio program, “The Michael Reagan Show.”
AMEN, Michael!
Excellently put.


I've finally realized that the GOP is not, and has never been the party of limited government that I thought it was.

The few times that the GOP's national leadership has been taken by believers in limited government such as Ronaldus Magnus are the exception, not the rule. When such leaders do take the reigns, they are invariably met with massive resistance from inside the party and struggle to make any progress.

Every other GOP president in the last 120 years, with the possible exception of Coolidge, was a big-government pro-business progressive, not a believer in individual liberty.

It's time we BILGes (Believers In Limited Government) started REJECTING the socialist wing of the GOP, and do all we can to promote fellow BILGes so as to take leadership of the party and make progress again.

I believe this will require vocally supporting third parties such as the Libertarian and Constitution parties when the GOP runs UNACCEPTABLE candidates such as McCain.

Consider - had Michael, Rush, Sean, Neal, Mark & Glen thrown McCain under the bus - as he has so often thrown us - the GOP leadership would now be cowering in fear of the limited government wing of the party. There would be no debate on whether to go left or right - we'd simply be working for a conservative victory.

Amen, Michael Reagan
I don't want to see or hear another Bush, ever. If Jeb thinks he's going to be a conservative leader, he has another think coming. I don't want to hear from Romney, either. Or any "moderate" Republican.

Reagan legacy
Reagan is the only president in my lifetime (and probably the lifetime of most people in this country) who served out his full terms, then handed the reins of power over to a successor from his party.

Guess he did something right.

Meanwhile, the Bushes gave us Clinton and Barky.

Remember Reagan, forget Bush.

Keep Up the Good Work
Michael
I agree with you. I think all the Republican Party should follow the example of Rush and Hannity and even you. Then the 21% of people who now consider themselves Republican can start holding their meetings in phone booths.
What's the matter Mikey some say something bad about your daddy.
I thought for a minute your cry-babying was gonna shut down my computer.
The Republicans are with no leaders, no ideas and no clues about why the are out of power.
The American people rejected your vision of America.
And Michael don't forget that it was your daddy who sold weapons to Iran. So for all of you who want to return to the days of Reagan those of us who lived through it remember it a little different than you.



We don't need "listening tourers"
I'm telling you guys, Ron Paul 2012. For the love of all you hold dear, go to the campaignforliberty.com site and learn more about him and real conservatism.

End the income tax.

End public schools and go to vouchers.

End our wasteful spending home and abroad.

End the genocide we call abortion.

End social security, which cannot sustain itself beyond 2042 at best.

He's a man of VALUES. He stands for what is right, he is not a political prostitute for votes like all these jerks who have destroyed the Republican party.

Good article--
Mike is right. Many of us wanted the borders closed, illegals deported, no jobs shipped out of the USA, small government, and lower taxes just to name a few. Romney, I believe, is too wishy washy and no way for Taco Jeb. Hunter and Tancredo were my choices, but the MSM didn't like them, and yes I like the way Sheriff Joe follows the law and enforces it, not like Peso George. We need a solid, no nonsense conservative in a hurry before the Obarfster sells us out completely.

It's not about forgetting...
Broken record time: It's not about 'forgetting' the transgressions, failures, and crimes of the Bush administration. It's about GETTING ANGRY about them.

I will promise you this: The GOP of old would not recognize the GOP of today. The GOP of old would be raising the roof on the litany of crimes perpetrated by the Bush administration. Heck, they'd be the ones yelling the loudest.

And don't start with the 'Bush was bad, Reagan was good' stuff. That is not the rhetoric that will rescue you this time... (After all, do we really want revisit how he sold weapons to Iran? I don't think so.)

Abandon the Reagan era?
Wise American patriots need to abandon the GOP and establish the Conservative Party! A Party that is truly Of the People,By the People and for the People! Even if it takes an armed revolution to throw these Liberal scum and Socialist/Communist pigs out of our government!

Trying to piece the GOP back together is a waste of precious time! The politicians of both Parties have abandoned the American People in pursuit of their personal fortunes and world control agendas.

How sad that the American people are allowing these Criminals in government to destroy our Free Republic! And doing it with our tax money! How stupid have we become??

Almost ready to give up.
I'm not quite, but almost ready to give up on the Republican party if they (we) don't get their act together. What a mess we made of '08 by nominating that stupid RINO. Republicans have done so well with principled conservative candidates, but we let those MSM bas---ds tell us that we had to be "moderate", and look where it got us. The only reason Conservatives voted for old stupid was that the alternative was and is so horrific. God help us survive until '10 when we can fire some of those criminals and then in '12 when we can really clean house.

I will ask again
Since Pres.Reagan is considered the God of
Conservatives please explain: Approved Abortion
as Gov.,approved amnesty for illegals,involved
in big tax hike as Prez.?????

I voted for him 4 times..and would vote for him again...but I bet not a single person can figure out why I asked these questions!!

Mike R., you are against listening? I learned
trigonometry at age 51!! Still learning, thank goodness. Would you consider the KKK group a
conservative bunch?
Elvis

Vote Present!
What is the problem with these statists?

Griffers! They run government, but still want us to STFU.


btw: I heard the best comeback to the Liberals a few minutes ago. The host was asking what should the GOP/Cons should do to avoid being called "The Party of No", when a woman from Illinois called in and said:

#1) Do not fight or say, "Nyet".

#2) Let the Dems. spend their way into oblivion.

#3) Let Obama and the loons pass all of their crappy legislation.

#4) Let them hang themselves, so no one will ever vote for them again; and.

#5) Smile, nod, and vote, "PRESENT".

Forget them all
Reagan began the policies that have lead to the current fiancial crisis. He presided over the illegal Iran-Contra affair, Bush was just a disaster.

Check out the numbers. The Democrats are better for America

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_0 5/006282.php


Xerxes
Wow! What are you so angry about in your life?

We can all listen and arehere to help. Maybe have some group therapy for you to resolve whatever transgressions you need to take out on others.

Way to represent yourself with such high caliber.

Out of your rabitt-assed mind
Elvis, What's the matter with you? You're obviously a very confused individual. Please get off the drugs and get some rest. Maybe you'll be more rational.

El Rexbo @ 11:34PM - a prediction
When you see the GOP senate caucus tamely, courteously vote to confirm Obama's upcoming SCOTUS nominee, you'll be ready.

*Forget* the RINO's. ALL OF THEM.

Until or unless the GOP publicly repudiates and expels all of the RINO's, they're not for real.

And the GOP shouldn't get a single penny from ANY conservative, until they get rid of the RINO's.

IS OBAMA DESTINED FOR GREATNESS?
Is Barack Obama destined for presidential greatness like an FDR or Ronald Reagan, a transformational figure changing the course of world history for the better? Or will his presidency end in failure and defeat, a disaster to his country and the world, one of history's tragic fools? Click my name for the answer.

Forget McCain, Not Reagan
Why is this the 1st TH column about the antics of this "National Council for a New America" that McCain has co-founded, in 3 days. 1st thing the GOP needs to do is put Mack out to pasture, not follow him around like clueless ducklings. Hello?! Are you learning disabled?! He did it his way & fell flat! Get a clue & ditch this loser! Anybody'd think Mack was blackmailing them, the way they fawn on him.

Wasn't GHW Bush the one who called Reagan's economic plan "voodoo economics?" He was the culprit who let the Dem Congress toss him into the briar patch of breaking his "Read My Lips" pledge, & started unravelling the wildly successful "Reaganomics."

Simply put, we've seen 21 yrs of the Empire striking back; concerted pushback & phoney "discrediting" of the Reagan accomplishments, low taxes, private enterprise & freedom generally, by the statists, leftists, & careerists within the GOP as well as its supposed adversaries. Anyone who advocates minimum government is the real enemy; their iron rice bowl is threatened.

Our present recession was caused by deliberate calculated government-motivated hyperstimulation of the economy with the housing bubble; it's now being used as a bogus argument for totalitarianism. The Repubs aren't arguing with that! Could you imagine if a Reagan had inherited this mess instead of the thug from Chicago? We'd be pulling out of it even now, & there wouldn't be trillion$ flushed down the crapper as so-called "stimulus."

WHy never a mention of Savage?
Finaly a mention of dumping Gosh Walley Bush and his bushed party! But why no mention of Michael savage or Ron Paul. The only Republican who is consistantly standing for the Reagan years is RON and you guys here act like he doesnt exist!

YOU still need to pull your head form the elephants behind Michael. Get behind Ron Paul and talk him up. You have 3.5 years to get a paul presidential bid going and get someone who is 100% AMERICAN elected! Palin pales in comparison and I and millions of others will no longer vote the Repulican't pink ticket!

Let the Dems have what they want?
Denise,
I heard Dick Morris say basically the same thing as your post says last night. He said the Repubs should just let the Dems have everything they want so as to not be viewed as obstructionist. I suppose that's going to happen one way or the other since they have such large majorities- but it's hard to imagine the Dems ever simply letting the right have what it wants if it were in charge.

Problem is, leftist policies are very hard to reverse, once someone is receiving a check it's very difficult for a politician to remove that check and stay in power.

From cheerleading to whining.
Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and -- in all modesty -- Mike Reagan spent most of the last 8 years defending Bush's actions and policies. Sure there was a little criticism sprinkled in, but out of republican partisanship, they jumped in bed with a liberal republican.

After the first 4 years of total disaster under Bush, they all supported him for reelection. They played up his few good points and ignored his liberal big government policies.

In 2000 when I first heard "compassionate conservative" I was insulted and my BS radar was blaring. Conservatives believe compassion is a personal trait not something forced by the government. The term is just a code word for liberal. Bush was my least favorite, tied with McCain for the GOP nomination.

In retrospect, I wish Gore had won in 2000. He would also have been a disaster, but likely would have been a one-term president and we would have avoided Bush.

Now after 8 years of kissing Bush's butt, these paragons of conseervative thought are ready to throw Bush under the bus. They helped put him in the driver seat and enabled his horrendous policies.

The republicans will not gain any credibility for at least 10 years.
And neither will Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and -- in all modesty -- Mike Reagan.


Well put wmou!
I felt like many in the conservative movement became the same type of mindless shills for Bush that the Dems were for Clinton in the 90s. Sadly, Clinton's signing of welfare reform (yes, I know he vetoed it more than once before signing it) gives him more conservative bona fides than anything Bush did. Passing a tax cut is meaningless when you bloat government the way he did.

Become Independent
So Long GOP

As President Reagan said "I didn't leave the party the party left me"

Nothing is more true than these words. I became an Independent after this last election.
NO MORE STATUS QUO No more GOP unless the person under consideration has MY principals and I'll no longer ever look at a party affiliation again...

I'm sick of all the idiots in the white house and Congress and I think we should throw ALL of them out and start over in 2010,2012

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security

Right on!
Edna, thanks for our declaration in your response. Michael, you are a true conservative and voice for our cause. Is it any wonder revolution has such appeal when tyrants the likes of which we now have in power presume that in a short time they can steal that which not only God has given, but which our founding fathers spelled out in such concise form. May we have a real revolution, committing such as we now have in government to the realm of the irrelevant, and should they rise again, to the sea of forgetfulness.

Trolls
You know you're on to something when the trolls come out and start spewing insults without a shred of credible logic to back up their invective.

In John McCain, the Republicans ran a moderate candidate, a war hero, someone who the media had lionized previously to the point that he had saluted them, "You're my base." Until they threw him under the bus when the national campaign started, as anyone with half a brain knew they would. He decreed any harsh rhetoric or criticism of Obama off limits and ran a squeaky clean campaign, keeping the gloves on at all times. He embraced amnesty, decried torture. He reveled in being a "maverick" and in disappointing more conservative Republicans. He was the poster boy and very template of the Media's preferred moderate Republican candidate.

And after he got beat like a drum, the Democrats, the media, and the so-called moderates are urging the Republicans to do what? To lurch further leftward. To try to out- liberal the Democrats.

Makes sense to me.

Forget all the Bush clan
Please!

idiots
Listen to what? Run on republican issues or change parties. We want Life, Liberty, and the Persuit of Happiness, not a nanny state. Reagan was 10x the man any Bush ever was. Romney is a Bush lackey at best.

Just a thought...
But maybe Jeb Bush and John McCain should be keeping a somewhat lower profile these days. The two biggest setbacks suffered by conservatism in the last 30 years were both named Bush. Sorry, but I'm just not taking a "third time's the charm" approach to any more Bushes.

And don't get me started on John McCain. Had he shown even a hint of willingness to challenge Obama directly, or shown a desire to win the election, I'd have more respect for him, even in a loss. Sarah Palin did both and did it well. That's why conservatives still like her (and why the left despises her.) The girlish backbiting of the McCain camp post-defeat underscores this. If Sarah wants to have a future in GOP politics at the national level, she would be well served to steer clear of this "Listening Tour."

WMOU...
In part I agree with you about the blind loyalty to Bush that many conservatives engaged in. Point taken, and there's definitely some nostra culpa to be spoken.

I was wary of Bush's "compassionate conservatism" from day one. It sounded way too much like the familiar "thousand points of light" nonsense of his dad, and moreover it was insulting. But here's the crux of the issue:

What were we to do? Stay home and let Kerry get elected? Not defend the relentless assault of the left from all quarters that went on for eight long years? The lesson to be learned from Bush is this: don't trust a candidate who doesn't understand and live by core conservative beliefs. They will inevitably morph into right-of-center, big-government statists.

In the meantime, at least SOME credit is due for peace at home, solid judicial appointees (far better than REAGAN'S, I might add) and making the first serious attempt at privatizing social security. As MR cousels, Bush should simply be forgotten. The vilification is a waste of time and energy.

JEB BUSH
Jeb Bush should hang his head in shame. His brother's four short years in Washington being the compassionate conservative and spending like a drunken sailer have destroyed the Republican Party. After George's leadership, even easily swayed Republicans are now questioning capitalism, saying there must be "something in between Communism and capitalism". I remind these people that capitalism has made us the country that we are and has sustained us for 250 years!

Ronald Reagan was a great president because he actually believed in conservatism, made good decisions, and wanted to be president, not for his ego or power, but for the betterment of his country - something that our leaders lack today. It's called character, love of country, and common sense.

DCortez: The Life, Liberty....
...and the Pursuit of Happiness Party is over!!!! The Land of the Enslaved and the Home of the Whimps don't want it. A Constitution-based country required brains and balls.

The American people have spoken: They are not Sons of Liberty; they are simpering little piglets. All they want is their own little tah-tah in order to suck at the public sow.

The Pubs are between a rock and a hard place. No real American can get elected. Tough love is a hard sell.

The American people have long been selling their birthright for a mess of caca, but they don't care. Ergo, the circular firing squad of the Republicans.

There is no way to stand on principles and get elected. There is no way to be Democrat-light and get elected.

And look to California. It's a mess because of Dem policies. But who gets the blame? The Pubs. No matter what happens, it's the Pubs fault.

There will ever be another Republian president in my life time. ACORN will see to that.

The Republicans have no clothes
"(Republicans) lost in 2006 and 2008 because they stopped listening to the "nostalgia" for the conservative principles which guided my dad's administrations. They receded backwards to the principle of losing elections, a habit that gripped the GOP until Newt Gingrich came along and showed them how to win congressional elections by standing for something, and my dad showed them how to win gubernatorial and presidential elections by championing the principles that made us the wealthiest and most-powerful nation in world history." - Michael Reagan

My memory of President Reagan (I was 35 when he first became president in 1981) is of someone who was great at cutting taxes, but lousy at cutting spending. Also, he was the first president to take our country down the dead end path of running up huge deficits as a way to avoid making the hard choices necessary to live within our means as a nation.

As a result, we became accustomed to having our cake and eating it too, we lost our regard for the need to sacrifice in order to build a strong fiscal foundation to ahieve genuine and lasting prosperity. President Reagan gave us the false prosperity of mortgaging our future, and we've been trying to live in that fantasy world ever since.

The day the Republicans are willing to tell us where exactly they plan to make the cuts that will give the small government they say they favor is the day I may start to believe they are truly guided by genuine principles.

Until then, they are offering nothing but the same old hot air that Republicans have been blowing our way since 1981.

Bush League
Had the Bushes stuck to the principles of Goldwater and Reagan,Jeb would be President.

RE : Forget Bush Not Reagan
I am 57 years old.I have seen Presidents come and go.I believe that President Reagan was significantly the most successful,honst and patriotic President the United States has ever had within the last 50 years.
Considering the current state of affairs of the Union.I recall his words and I fear that we are the generation that accomplishes the undoing of America.
"Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom, and then lost it, have never known it again."
--Ronald Reagan

Do you remember?
"Read my lips,no new taxes"...George Herbert Walker Bush-1988.

"Read my hips,no new taxes"...George Herbert Walker Bush-1990.

"What happened to my second term?"...George Herbert Walker Bush-1992.

JeffJenn
I'm not sure you realize who had control of the purse during the Reagan/Bush years. As a practical matter, Presidents can neither tax nor spend. Those are powers delegated to congress. Presidents CAN propose... sometimes they get their way, sometimes not. What you're effectively doing is a cursory review of a deficit line graph and drawing some wrong conclusions.

Defense spending skyrocketed under Reagan, but so did the liabilities of our massive entitlement state. Congressional democrats gave no ground on this. It wasn't until 1994 that we had both houses of C. Six years later... we had a balanced budget. What you have to realize is that many expenditures are years or even decades in the making. You're right about one thing though -- the Republicans won't say WHERE they want to make cuts... because the answer is obvious and would be political suicide.

Ronald Reagan, Patriot
I fear that we will never have another Ronald Reagan as President. I had the honor to call him my President. He made this country strong and proud. The Republicans of today just don't get it.

Jose922: The Pubs of Today Do Get It
Today's voters want their goodies. They see conservatives as standing in the way of their goodies.

Here Here
Jose922 !!!

I too remember the Best President Ronald Reagan !! What a strong, charasmatic, wonderful leader and man he was. He knew who Ronald Reagan was, the values he stood for we all stood for deceny, he knew how to charm byr lead, he knew how to empower America without denegrating the rest of the world, he was a superstar because of his humility, he was intelligent, he surrounded himself with the best and they knew his loyalty. Ronald Reagan embodied what an American President was and is suppose to be - a pillar of strength, knowledge, leadership, intelligence and moral courage.

There will NEVER be another one like him - sadly, but we should NEVER forget him or what he stood for. If we do that then we WILL be in power once again.

Republicans sell free lunch
(Samuel): "You're right about one thing though -- the Republicans won't say WHERE they want to make cuts... because the answer is obvious and would be political suicide."

I agree with you to a point. My criticism of Republicans is that all they really do is pay lip service to cutting spending. Everybody's for small government, especially when you're never told that you'll have to give up something to get it.

This is why the Republican party can only go so far with their so-called principles. If conservative prinicples are so wonderful and they did such wouderful things for our country under Reagan, why did the Republicans abandon them and lose out to the Democrats?

Oh, I forgot. Somehow the Democrats mucked things up and managed to blame the Republicans. If only it weren't so easy to fool the American people.

Maybe when the economy gets back on a good footing , the Republicans can regain control of the government again with their spiel about cutting taxes, while complaining about, but never really addressing, spending.

Ronald Reagan, A man of Character
who was beholding to no one. He could lead this country because he know how to lead is own life, i.e., with character. And because of that he had the wisdom to know who and what the country was and where it needed to go.

The question now is, are there enough people in this country who run there own lives with character?

Occam's Razor

The simplest answer is the usually the CORRECT answer.

History speaks VERY clearly on this, though the GOP tries to distract you with its right hand while the left hand is doing the dirty deed.

1980, 1984, 1988, 1994: campaigns based on strong conservative principals, and landslide wins.

1992, 1996, 2006, 2008: campaigns built on squishy "moderate" offerings, and the GOP gets its butt kicked.

2000 and 2004: a candidate hiding his essential "moderate" nature eking out squeeker wins against arguably THE most incompetent opponents since Dukakis, in which the gun issue played big both times.

Which is exactly why the Dems are avoiding that issue like the plague nowadays.


But there it is: the election history of the last almost-three decades, and the message is as plain as the noses on your faces.

What's so hard to understand about that, that a "listening tour" is even necessary? Hell... just look at those eelection results, and you have the answer.

Jesse Jackson was right (once)
when he said... America, get out the Bushes!

The Bushes have destroyed the Reagan Revolution and handed over this Nation to sacking Vandals.

Micheal, you nailed it. It will be a long time before the public trusts the Republicans with the keys again. They went on a drunken binge and we are now paying for it with these facists in power.

My vote goes to the chimp
It's been said before, but bears repeating. Bonzo would have made a better president than Reagan. I'm just sorry I was forced to live through that decade.

What is wrong is obvious....
those ON the listening tour are what is WRONG with the Republican Party. Willard Romney brought gay marriage to MA, made abortion a $50 co-pay procedure and then claims he is a conservative. John McCaim was the worst possible candidate and has always been a RINO. Jeb Bush might have been a good governor but I for one will NEVER vote for another Bush. I read some lips and watched a fake born again conservative start us down the path to socialism and one world government. Jorge set up Obama to win. I bet he voted for him.

Demonizing George W.
Folks, the man won two elections and increased the congressional majority in his second term victory. It wasn't G.W. that the American people were upset with. It was the Republican party with which he is associated.

George W. Bush tried to lead Republicans into an era of "Compassionate Conservatism", but conservatives are not yet ready to be compassionate.

I'll repeat it until I lose my voice. (Well, ok, so my voice is in no danger... maybe until I get carpal tunnel) Start paying attention to working class financial issues, and quit making excuses for not having answers to those issues.

I'm tired of hearing multi-billionaire's and their mouthpiece's whine about Democracts buying votes. Buy some votes of your own! Make the American Industrialist a hero again. DO things that make Americans feel more comfortable with big business than big government, or expect to keep losing.

Re: Nuts in the head
"It's been said before, but bears repeating. Bonzo would have made a better president than Reagan. I'm just sorry I was forced to live through that decade."

Well, you certainly got your wish this time, didn't you.

Re: Jeb Bush an honorable Republican
"I'm inclined to doubt the accuracy of that report since Jeb Bush was probably the best governor Florida ever had, and one who clung ferociously to the Republican principles exemplified by my father, Ronald Reagan."

Considering the that this specious rumor was started on the Leftist Blogosphere, that is a pretty accurate assessment.

When I inquired of Jeb Bush about this is what he told me in his e-mail reply:

"I did not say we should abandon president reagan. I said we should take our values and our principles and apply them to our challenges today. That is what I said and that is what I believe."

Too bad his dad and his brother ruined the Bush political "brand-name" or else Jeb would now be President instead of that Bonzo in the White House now.

ShaneRoach re your #48

You wrote: "George W. Bush tried to lead Republicans into an era of 'Compassionate Conservatism', but conservatives are not yet ready to be compassionate."


Oh, please... what a crock.

"Compassionate conservative" turned out to be code for "liberal Republican". That's exactly the s**t sandwich the GOP tried to serve with McLiberal while calling it fois gras on petit points.

What sells and wins elections, as I wrote in my post #44, is a traditonal small-government, fiscally responsible philosophy based on individual responsibility as personified by Reagan, not the GOP version of nanny-state paternalistic Dem-Lite "me-too just a little less" profligate Big Government BS the GOP's been shoveling for at least the last 8 years.

Your idea of "compassion" is just like the rest of the RINOs and the Dem/libs: giving a man a fish.

I believe in teaching a man to fish for himself.

YOUR way feeds him for a day, and makes him dependant on you for his sustenance, classic liberal ideology.

MY way makes him independant and able to feed himself and his family.

Which one is TRUE compassion?


Re: Government is the problem
"I'll repeat it until I lose my voice. (Well, ok, so my voice is in no danger... maybe until I get carpal tunnel) Start paying attention to working class financial issues, and quit making excuses for not having answers to those issues."

You mean like George the 2nd did when he supervised the halving of most "working class" 401Ks? You haven't a clue about compassion if you think it can be delivered by any government.

ShaneRoach...
you make some valid points, but you're wildly left-of-the-mark on compassionate conservatism. All that means is right-of-center big government entitlements + tax cuts. You can't turn conservatism into something it isn't. REAL COMPASSION is enabling Americans to care for themselves and their families. It is NOT creating whole new classes of State Dependents.

Liberal "Compassion" is nothing more than expensive, patronizing enslavement and condescension. So you're right. I'm not ready to go there.

Re: Classical Liberalism
"YOUR way feeds him for a day, and makes him dependant on you for his sustenance, classic liberal ideology."

No, not "Classic Liberal" but "Modern Liberal" ideology.



Re: Classical Liberalism
CLASSICAL LIBERALISM: A term used to describe a political philosophy commonly held in nineteenth-century England and France but now undergoing a renaissance in the United States. Classical liberals advocate free markets, a vibrant array of nongovernmental institutions (such as civic groups, schools, churches, etc.), and minimal tax-financed government services. Classical liberals firmly believe that both persons and property should be protected from physical harm. They also emphasize the strict enforcement of contracts. Classical liberals, following Lord Acton, consider liberty to be the highest political value but not to the point of becoming a worldview. Examples of classical liberal thinkers include Frederic Bastiat*, Lord Acton*, Alexis de Tocqueville*, John Locke*, John Stuart Mill*, and Friedrich Hayek*.

MODERN LIBERALISM: A term used to describe a political philosophy with progressive cultural and political viewpoints. Modern liberals are not always hostile to the free market, but they do think that if left to itself the random nature of the market will produce poverty and inequality. They argue that state action is necessary in all areas where human welfare is at risk, including direct government assistance, pensions, unemployment insurance, and health care. Liberals actively lobby for social change through political and legislative means. Their motivation for proposing radical reforms usually stem from a perceived violation of justice, fairness, or a sense of social equality. Today's usage is often associated with such terms and concepts as legal activism, government regulation of the economy, and the redistribution of wealth. Key thinkers include John Kenneth Galbraith*, Upton Sinclair*, John Rawls*, Reinhold Niebuhr*, and Walter Rauschenbusch*.
From: Dictionary of Terms for Free and Virtuous Society
*=WIP

Hahahaha, Acton!

Yeah, you're right as to the definitions of types of "liberalism".

However, I used the word "classic" in the sense of its other definition:

"authentic, authoritative b: typical (a classic example of chicanery) (a classic error)"

So... I'll restate as "typical liberal ideology"... just for you!



Reagan new how to govern between the two
extremns of anarchy and tyranny.

Sadly today, most of the citizenry don't even know the difference.

Thanks
That's me you are talking about. If you watched the one with Cantor, Bush, and Romney this African American received a round of applause for saying the same things you are saying in this article. I watched as the Three Musketeers glossed over the fact that the Brother had exposed their Hypocrisy, as they looked around for another questioner or at the wall behind them, but anywhere accept at the Brother. By the time I heard that other great Republican, Colin Powell, talking about me wanting to pay more in Punitive Taxes and have Obama and Michelle be my mama and daddy,I was ready to throw up. I have stopped looking at 2010/2012 because John McCain will still be there. I am thinking after reading this article 2016/2020.

On Virtual Representation

I wish the Republican party would think
I wish the Republican party would think logically.

If you become more like a party that has all of the advantages: big media, unions, and voter fraud (ACORN), fund raising fraud (see Obama's internet scam, or funding raising "miracle") you take away any advantage you have and will lose every time.

A) does anyone believe that the democrats have a future with Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid running the show? The more they talk, the more crazy they sound and no amount of lipstick is going to cover up their crazy. Remember how the media painted Joe Biden in the elections? Notice how his reputation dropped to make Dan Quayle's seem like an Einstein? We need more media coverage on Pelosi. Who cares if it is biased. She is a loser and no amount of bias is going to cover it up. As much as the democrats hate the Clintons it was the Clintons who restored people's confidence in a rational left. It won't take long for the public to lose it.

If all Republicans cared about was power the key would be to let Democrats hang themselves. If the Democrats haven't done it yet I guarantee they will with cap and trade and universal health care (they have been tried 30 times over with disasterous results.

B) Republicans lost because democrats pretended to be them. Look at Rahm Emanual's strategy. They clearly stated their strategy. Does anyone else understand the implications of this move? Of where the country actually is? Of course the strategy was disengenious because who cares if you nominate a conservative democrat with Nancy Pelosi in charge and every democrat voting party lines.

I hate to be Polyannaish
I hate to be Polyannaish, but this is the last chance that big, Parochial government has to impose it's will before their is way too much exposure (internet media) to show how awful they are. The internet is destroying Islam, exposing entrenched bureaucracy in Europe, as well as catching and announcing many would be scandals. It was correctly used to fight the immigration bill and it almost succeeded in blocking the ridiculous spending bill. It succeeded in allowing and expanding the tea parties protests.
The faster conservatives figure out creative ways to expand the internet and promote awareness the sooner the paradigm shift happens.

Right on
You are right on Michael.

Republicans lost the conservatives while doing things like doubling the size of the Dept of Education and abandoning choice in education, Creation of Dept of Homeland Security, Medicare part B, Federalization of airport screeners, campaign finance reform (otherwise known as political speech censorship), and saying conservatives are the problem.

Republicans lost the moderates in large part because of a too interventionist foreign policy and not enough protection right at our own borders.

GOP leaders ought to read and listen to Jim DeMint “How Republicans Can Build a Big-Tent Party” and Michael.

Lets not
forget the comment attributed to Christy Todd
snobWhitman..I don't have it verbatim but it was something to the effect that they, meaning the Rockefellar wing of snobs in the GOP had to do something about the Conservative wing. She said this back in the the late 90's/early 2000's not sure. Would appreciate it if someone who is smarter than I regarding computers could find that.
Anyway, that is what they have succeeded in doing, isolating and ignoring us for almost a decade. Now they want us to believe they have the answers when the are doing the same old stupid go along get along they insisted on that lost them the majority and very likely set the state for the loss of the Republic.
We have been hammering them with what we want
from our leaders and are ignored. I am sick of this passive go along with the nominees of this
warped occupier of the White House..there's none that are honest or who revere the Constitution as ORIGINALLY written. But doofus's like Hatch will roll over and piddle on themselves to give due respect to the prez's
nominees EVEN when they know their ideology is toxic to the Constitution and the Republic.

Confidence in the GOP isn't building
The real problem as I see it isn't which past president did it right or wrong. The problem is average conservatives aren't seeing any real leadership in the GOP, anywhere.

If I have to go back to My Dear President Reagan who is DEAD and a personal hero of mine, for freedom in America, there is serious lack of leadership. There are plenty of FoxNewsies that get some of it but the open negativity and anger over the Election LAST YEAR isn't finding any better candidates in the GOP.Frankly, I wish the GOP could be more progressive like it was w/ Lincoln.

I really never had problems with President Bush until I was paying $4 at the pump and he was talking with the Saudis and saying speculators were causing the high gas prices. To me, he may as well have said Texans were to blaim. C'mon.

Get rid of the Mac's. He failed against Bush. Romney failed against Mac. Pass on him, too. Find a M McConnell who isn't afraid to be Republican. I don't think I'm unique.

I don't like Jeb for Prez. If others in our country had wanted Jeb, his chance would have been when his brother ran. He probably couldn't have gotten the nomination.

The press attack on S Palin's family would be nothing next to what they would do to Jeb. His daughter 'ain't the twins. It isn't fair but she isn't as strong as Sarah's daughter and Noelle's issues aren't a sweet little baby but a drug problem.

Average folks need to see leadership. I, like most Americans, want simple platforms, straightforward handling of the press, and leadership that doesn't hide out behind more appealing future leaders. I did, vote for McCain but who else was there?


shaneroach
Geez man! Do you know why there is a federal government? It was not created for the benefit of individuals. It's not just that it was not considered during the federal convention, it's that there was a concern about those who wanted a "leveling".
What was the main concern during the Convention? REVENUE! They were not attempting to consolidate the nation, though there were a few such as Hamilton. Even when having a national government was spoken of, it was not to take away the power which the states were ALREADY exercising for their citizens. The UNITED had to with defense and commerce that occurred outside of state borders, and being financialy solvent.
Also, the examples you used yesterday concerning societal obligations for the poor fail to consider the context and dependency on all the other commands to Israel being observed. You apply only one part of all the covenantal obligations Israel had as a result of God choosing them as a unique people. Would you then say that stoning sodomites or rebellious children applies? How about worshipping God alone? If not, your analogy fails.

for Paul fans
I was a Duncan Hunter man myself, but really knew nothing of Paul until too late. I've been late getting in the political game period. Anyway, I like what I have seen in him, but have to wonder if his age in 2012 will be a liability? I also think that the importance of the office of the President is overrated, and would frankly like more Conservative/Libertarian reps and sens, particularly as making a strong case for their states rights to exercise the powers which have always been theirs, except for the clear liilegal usuraptive acts of the federal government.
Federal - external
State - internal

Reagan was a moderate
Sure I would take a buch more Reagans right now, but we really need hard core Federalist minded folks. Reagan got behind Social Security, medicaid and medicare, along with other unfederal type of government, so I just really don't see him as a true conservative. A Bush? Oy vey! Show me what Bush 1 was doing in Kuwait. Common Defense? Certainly wasn't. Bush 2. NCLB, c'mon. Iraq? Sorry folks but Afghanistan had Constitutional merit, but not Iraq. BCRA? Why did he not veto this? Did he ever actually read the Constitution, or just look at John Yoo's briefings?

No
kg, I will not surrender to defeatism. You are lumping ALL Americans into the parasite class. You forget that the occupier of the White House did NOT receive a mandate. 67 million voted for, 62 million against (not to mention those who voted third party or stayed home in disgust), the DemonRATs (I use that to describe the progressive/marxists in control of that party as opposed to the rank and file democrats who don't realize their party eas hi jacked by traitors) anyway, the DemonRATS are overreaching, they really believe the devils lie that the majority of Americans want this
so called change because the election was stolen in 2000 and again in 04, and are looking at the party switches in '08 that were mainly from Operation Chaos to keep Hilary in the campaign. They are so smug, so arrogant they believe they are now our rulers.

Republican versus RINO
It is ESSENTIAL that Republicans and conservatives NOT repeat some of the mistakes that dragged them down recently-- mainly spending and growing guvment like liberals.

Notwithstanding that caveat, Republicans won 5 of 6 elections after Carter, several by blowouts until the coronation of the ObaMessiah... only Slick Willie's second term was a win for the left-- and HE was dancing like a center-right pol (the era of big govt. is OVER). Slick had claimed a mandate in '92, but gadfly Perot queered those results, and with a Libertarian/right message at that... Slick got only 42% of the vote.

It was NOT the traditional Republican message that the electorate repudiated in 2008... it was Dubya's neoCON adventure in Iraq, followed by the economic collapse, which the LEFT in Congress (Dodd, Barney "I want your Frank," Schumer, etc.) had engendered with demands for sub-prime mortgage lending.

The ObaMessiah/Glowbama will likely learn to regret it if he overplays the big guvment stratagem. The tea parties are a sincere rejection in the making. His negatives are HIGHER than Dubya's were after 3 months.

Defeating Obammunisim

A great article Mr. Reagan. I too strongly beleive the next GOP presidential candidate MUST be an unwavering, unapologetic Reagan conservative. Only then will we defeat the Obammunists and take back the White House.

By the way, my pickup sports a bumper sticker with Ronald "Maximus" Reagan's official White House portrait along with one of his great quotes, "Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them."

Chuck


Forget Nostalgia
Looking back on what's happened, I would say to forget nostalgia altogether. Dole and McCain both ran on nostalgia -- people who were supposedly accomplished that were treating their campaigns as looking back to the past than ahead. They had no vision for the future. The reason Dubya won was because he had a vision, regardless of whether or not you agreed with it, from compassionate Conservatism to the Spread of Democracy.

As time passes, the number of voters who remember Reagan and his legacy dwindles. I barely remember him. The Democrats have started to phase out references to JFK or FDR because people have no living memory of them. We should do the same. In politics you cannot rest on your laurels, and with every age comes a new political fight.

Ronald Reagan Quote
Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.
It is Govt. Job to get out of the way and let the free market place find its own level it gas always done since America was founded . But those in Power sadly always seek more power and control our Fore Fathers warned us repeatedly in their work .
Obama is their King George and how ours now as well !!!!
Government we have found was always the Problem never the fix .
It is obvious Reagan was our own Crystal Ball reader on Obama reckless spending habits sneaking us into radical Socialism and really Closet Marxism without question .

Amen and amen
Amen and amen

How Can You....
argue with anything in this article? Mike nailed it.

I would add that I hope never to see another Bush in the WH. GHWB and GWB were marginally better than the Dem libs of their vintage. We can improve on the Bushes. As to Jeb, I would say, "You go home now," although pragmatically, I would definitely favor Jeb over a Dem in the senate for FL.

Credibility gap
"If the GOP listeners want to know what the conservative majority among voters want and are thinking about, all they need to do is listen to Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and -- in all modesty -- Mike Reagan."

"Our voices are the voice of the majority of Republican voters and open-minded independents."


Yet despite this "majority" voice they could not stop McCain from gaining the nomination. They went so far as to trash him during the primaries for not being a "real conservative". Then they collectively had to eat crow and grudgingly support him during the general election. Some "voice" they have turned out to be. And what Republican president has ever managed to reduce taxes, lower spending and reduce the size of government? No one. Anyone ever get two out of three? Again, no one - not even Reagan.

El REXBO...SMILE.
Thanks for being concerned about my RABBIT
QUICK MIND!Smile.
Confused...me...? No way,amigo.
But I noticed you didn't answer my questions!
I will have to answer them my self.
Reagan was not a FAR RIGHT PERSON! He was as
conservative as circumstances allowed! And you didn't respond to the specifics I mentioned!
Come on...Iam waitng!Smile. Anyone else is invited to respond! I remember very clearly
when Reagan was Prez there was FAR RIGHT people
slamming Reagan for being mushy(liberal).
Iam the only one who remembers?
My reason for mentioning the KKK

OOOOPS! el rexbo
OOOOPS! Excuse me for hitting the wrong key!
KKK: were they not conservatives? Don't take my guns(I agree),believe in the Bible,etc., etc.
Reagan WAS RIGHT OF CENTER!!! Period!But not some fanatical looney who couldn't reason with reality!
As I said- I voted for him 4 times!
I will get my rest. But the facts are the facts
and please address the original issues I brought up? Thank you.
Elvis
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.