Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Michael Reagan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Liberty Wins a Big One
by Michael Reagan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Liberals, who hate guns almost as much as they hate cars, got a well-deserved lesson in Second Amendment rights when the Supreme Court spit in their face by ruling that the Constitution really does guarantee the right of Americans to own guns.

The ruling, which struck down the District of Columbia’s laws almost totally restricting handgun ownership, affirmed the traditional view that the Second Amendment means exactly what it says when it guarantees "the right of the people to keep and bear arms."

The avid gun-grabbers have long insisted that the accompanying clause, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state" restricts the right to bear arms to members of said militia -- a sophistry in view of the fact that at the time the amendment was adopted, the “militia” included all able-bodied adult white males.

As Thomas B. McAffee & Michael J. Quinlan, writing in the North Carolina Law Review, March 1997, Page 781, stated "... Madison did not invent the right to keep and bear arms when he drafted the Second Amendment -- the right was pre-existing at both common law and in the early state constitutions."

Obviously, the Founders were not gun grabbers, as the gun-grabbing community would have us believe. Actually, unlike today’s liberals, they had faith in their fellow citizens and in their ability to avail themselves of their rights in a safe and reasonable manner.

The District of Columbia law was based on the fallacious idea that by banning hand gun ownership by citizens except under the most onerous conditions, criminals -- a not un-sizeable part of the district’s population even with the exclusion of members of Congress as a criminal class -- wouldn’t be able to buy and own guns and thus continue their murderous ways.

C’mon now. Do they really believe that criminals buy their guns in legitimate gun shops? Or do they understand that their anti-handgun laws haven’t made even the slightest dent to the city’s incredible murder rate? Don’t they realize that their Draconian gun laws punish honest citizens unable to protect themselves and their homes, and not the thugs who are on a killing rampage on the streets of the nation’s capital? Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Reagan, the eldest son of Ronald Reagan, is heard daily by over 5 million listeners via his nationally syndicated talk radio program, “The Michael Reagan Show.”
Jim - Tarred Liberals
Jim,
You are healthy because you choose to do the things that are healthy for you. I do not believe you walk 3 miles a day because there is some government worker that checks up on you.
We can be conservative and liberal personally without the government involvement. Reasonable private insurance could cover those that need it without taxes.
Our social upheaval is again due to unnecessary government regulations on nuclear energy, oil refineries, oil exploration and drilling, subsidies that cost us up to 50 cents for a gallon of bio-fuel. Food is more expensive because we are burning it. Restrictions on diesel fuels (super low sulphur) have pushed prices through the roof.

Rich
"The folks at GTMO are combatants taken in combat against our forces. There is not doubt as to their guilt/innocence with respect to being a combatant."


You’ve really got to be joking.

You yourself say in your very next paragraph that hundreds were released from gitmo.

And it is not at all clear what kind of evidence exists for keeping the others.

Bureaucrats do not like to admit mistakes, particularly the longer they have held someone.

A warlord might approach a U.S. soldier after a firefight claiming he has people who were shooting at the soldiers. While there is nothing wrong with our solders taking these people in for temporary detention and interrogation, they should not be held for 5 years based on a warlord's word alone.

You also claim that of the 100s released, 40 “returned” to “the battle field”. You don’t know they “returned.” Believe it or not, when someone who has done nothing wrong and gets detained for years on end, they tend to get angry.

And nothing you have written has ANYTHING to do with the suspension clause for habeas in the constitution which the justices were required to apply here.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.