Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, February 14, 2008
Michael Reagan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain
by Michael Reagan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


In 1976 the Ford vs. Reagan campaign for the Republican presidential nomination got so heated it looked as if my father and Jerry Ford would never again talk to one another.

When it was over and Ford had won, what did Ronald Reagan do? He simply went all-out to help Ford win his re-election, as did I and as did my sister Maureen. My dad simply followed his rule of backing the Republican candidate no matter who he was.

Assuming that John McCain will be the Republican nominee, you can bet my father would be itching to get out on the campaign trail working to elect him even if he disagreed with him on a number of issues.

Unlike my father, a lot of conservatives stayed home in 1976, and we got four years of Jimmy Carter, whose main legacy was to drive the Shah of Iran from power and create the Islamic Republic of Iran with a bunch of wild-eyed mullahs running the show. He also gave us 20 percent inflation and long, long lines at the gas pumps. And don't forget 440 days of Americans held hostage by the mullahs.

By staying home those conservatives made possible the future election of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

We are still suffering from the legacy of James Earl Carter, thanks to the conservatives who refused to follow Ronald Reagan's example and instead sulked at home while the nation was being handed over to the worst president in American history.

We were still in the middle of the Cold War in those days, and by staying home conservatives risked losing that war by allowing an incompetent leader to become commander in chief.

Four years later Ronald Reagan took over, the hostages were immediately released, and he went on to win the Cold War. Now we have another world-wide war going on with a hidden enemy sworn to kill us all, and the policy of the Democrats running for the presidency is to throw up their hands and withdraw from the battlefield, leaving it to the enemy -- and our fate in the hands of Osama bin Laden.

Is that what the let's-stay-home-on-election-day conservatives want? Do they want the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, Barack Obama, as their president? Do they want the pseudo-Marist Barack Obama -- who reportedly has a photo of the murderous Castroite thug Che Guevara hanging in his Houston, Texas campaign headquarters -- hanging that photo in the Oval Office?

Do they want Hillary Clinton, the duplicitous former first lady, back in the White House enjoying all those furnishings she and her husband tried to swipe from the mansion?

Do they want a Democrat spending even more money that the government doesn't have on scores of programs right out of Karl Marx's playbook?

That's exactly what they'll get if they sit out the election and stay home on Election Day. That's called biting off your nose to spite your face. Or even more to the point, political suicide.

Let me say this. There has been plenty of battling in the primaries, and I've been in the middle of the battle, but until now haven't committed myself to any candidate, waiting until we had a nominee.

That's over.

If John McCain is the nominee of the party, this Reagan will happily campaign with him. The alternative is unthinkable to anyone who loves this nation.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Reagan, the eldest son of Ronald Reagan, is heard daily by over 5 million listeners via his nationally syndicated talk radio program, “The Michael Reagan Show.”
I still haven't made up my mind,
but if I do vote for McPretender my bumper sticker will read "I'm voting for McCain.....But that doesn't mean I have to like it".

Michael
Quit telling us what Ronald Reagan 'would' do. I don't claim to know what my father would do...neither should you.

Regardless, even if RR would back McCain, I don't care...I will not! Are we to believe RR never made a mistake?

Defeat McCain!!

true to a point
I admire and respect Reagan for alot of what he did and for who he was. But those were different days. Party loyalty doesn't dominate my mind. What has the Republican party done for me lately? Not that it is about me, but I don't want to cave to Moderates anymore. Sorry, but I just can't support McCain

It's not over... 1
Do some research!!!!
When McCain reaches 1191 as declared by the MSM, that will really not be the case. He is not guaranteed all of those delegates.
HE MUST WIN THE 1191 DELEGATES AT THE CONVENTION!!!!
DID YOU GET THAT!!!!
HE DOES NOT WIN THE DELEGATES DURING THE PRIMARIES!!!
.
Bound or pledged delegates are committed to the winner of the primary to vote for that candidate in the first round. Many states have yet to pick delegates. Of those that have, MH and even RP have very high delegate counts even though the latter hasn't won a single primary. How? Well people just simply apply to become Delegates. More of the MH and RP supporters are activist enough to be willing to become delegates than McCain supporters.
.
The primaries and caucuses are nothing more than window dressing. Delegates are not chosen the day of the primary/caucus. The only thing the primaries/caucuses do, is to commit the BOUND/PLEDGED delegates to the winner either by winner take all or proportioned out.

At the convention, there will be bound/pledged and unbound/unpledged delegates. NOT ALL DELEGATES FOR EACH STATE ARE BOUND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
.
The unbound/unpledged can vote for anyone!!!!!
.
At the convention, if McInsane does not get 51% of the delegate vote on the first round, then they vote again. In the next round, delegates can vote for whomever they want.
.
Read and learn please!!!!! and spread the word to everyone you can.
.
According to the sight below, here are the bound and unbound totals as of today.....McCain has 796 bound and 18 unbound delegates.
.


It's not over... (2)
Now let’s do some math:
McCain needs 395 bound delegates to reach 1191 of the remaining states:
.
Texas - 137 bound and 3 unbound
Ohio - 88 UNBOUND
South Dakota - 24 bound and 3 unbound
Wisconsin - 37 bound and 3 unbound
Vermont - 17 bound
Idaho - 26 bound and 6 unbound
Hawaii - 20 bound
Pennsylvania - 74 UNBOUND
Oregon - 27 bound and 3 unbound
Puerto Rico - 20 bound and 3 unbound
North Carolina - 69 bound
Indiana - 27 bound and 30 UNBOUND
Kentucky - 45 bound
Mississippi - 36 bound and 3 unbound
Rhode Island - 17 bound and 3 unbound
Nebraska - 30 bound and 3 unbound
New Mexico - 29 bound and 3 unbound
.
There are 561 bound delegates left of which Mr. McCain must win 71% of to reach 1191.....now when was the last time he won with 71% of the vote?
Now Huck will probably win Nebraska, Kentucky, Mississippi, and South Dakota.......if this happens, then McCain would have to win just about every remaining delegate, and that is not likely to happen.
Basically, McCain would almost have to run the board of the other states to win......not likely.
.
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Vermont is the only winner take all state remaining, so even if McCain wins a state, he does not get all of the bound delegates.
.
.
THE MSM IS LUMPING BOTH BOUND AND UNBOUND IN THEIR TOTALS.......VERY MISLEADING

Romney and McCain
Romney will be endorsing McCain. Conservatives do not like McCain,review Obama's web site to see his plans. After reviewing the web site, then review the US Constitution. Make your voting decision after that review.

2006: "Let's just sit this one out!"
Wasn't it the plan to stay home for the elections in 2006, in order to teach Republicans a lesson about how Americans really felt about illegal immigration? I distictly remember Laura Ingraham saying that on her show.

Judging from the type of candidates we got for our primaries, it was not successful to stay home. It did not bring the party to the right.

Well, "If at first you don't succeed, try, try again!"

Thanks Michael!
I always thought that Ronald Reagan went home to his ranch in California and abandoned Gerald Ford.
Thank you for setting the record straight!
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
At least in 1976, we knew that Ronald Reagan was waiting in the wings for 1980.
Who is the Ronald Reagan waiting in the wings for 2012?
Exactly!
So let's all agree to hold our noses and support John McCain.
Also, let's hope that he picks a REAL conservative as his running mate. Because his running mate might just be our nominee in 2012.
Personally, I like George Allen, the Senator who introduced him at CPAC last week, but there are several strong candidates who could help McCain's ticket by attracting disaffected conservatives!

Greg B
If anyone would know what Reagan would do it would be his son. Maybe you don't know your father, but I confident that I would know what mine would do in a given situation.

Michael has cited what his dad has done in the past and what he would then do now. That's good enough for me. I probably don't like McCain anymore than you do, but that's no reason to deny a man his opinion of his own father.

If McCain is the nominee
and it appears that he will be, I will vote for him even though he and I are far apart on many issues.

Of those that matter most to me, national security, and the courts, his views are considerably closer to mine than those offered by the other party.

The masochistic tendency on the part of some conservatives who believe that it is better to lose everything than to accept the fact political parties are themselves a form of compromise, is something I will never understand. As the saying goes, half a loaf is better than none.

I was a young adult in th 70's and I do not want to see a repeat of the Carter era, or perhaps even worse.


Sense!
Thanks Michael, for making some sense. These people who think that "4-8 years of Obama/Hillary won't be bad for this country" need to wake up. The damage they could do the Supreme Court alone would set us back for decades to come, snd that's not even looking at the disastrous economic policies that could be implimented with a favorable Congress. It's time for conservatives to come together and face off against the real enemy here, and it's NOT John McCain.

Michael, your Dad was a great President
There is something you have forgotten about him though, that you should remember. I believe he stated that "I didn't leave the (fill in the blanks) party, it left me!"

Sorry my friend, but the Republican party is no longer anything worth supporting. It should fold its tent and its members join up with the Democrats, who are also not worth an ounce of support.

If you want the real story about what has happened to our beloved country, I suggest you visit my website, JOEOLIVAFORPRESIDENT.ORG, and find out how "we the people" have been scammed by the elites from both parties, and our inheritance stolen from us. It is the only place you will hear an antidote to the DEM/GOP/MSM propaganda. Thanks, Joe

Support For Republican McCain
Mr. Reagan, you are right! This is not a contest for purity this is a political battle and if my fellow right-wingers choose to make a point by sacrificing appointments to the Supreme Court and if they presume that those of us willing to vote for Senator McCain are soft-headed moderate wimps let them digest this: Here is someone who was given the Constitutional Oath by a Captain of Marines in 1971, who stood for Ronald Reagan in 1966 and 1970, and who backed Barry Goldwater in 1964 telling you that if you lie low and hand the Presidency to Hillary Hatefulness or to Barack Cotton Candy your smugness is all the comfort you deserve in your willingness to crash the Republic into a Consolidationist/Socialist wall!

re: orlandocajun 3:02
Like you said, it's "his opinion"...not fact.

I, for one, am tired of Michael speaking for his father. In fact, I suspect RR is also tired of it. I respect RR; Michael is no Ronald Reagan and should quit speaking for him.

Let's not be too quick
I think McCain needs to sweat it out for awhile and make a lot of concessions. Conservatives need to go to the convention with an agenda to reform the nomination process so that this establishment lock can be broken.

I'd like to see and end to winner take all primaries especially in the more liberal states like New York. Also there should be just one primary day for all the states. Any state that refuses to comply, they get their delagates taken away. I think there should also be a penalty for states with open primaries.

michael
if i thought for 1 second that Mccain would be any better than Carter then I would be on board,,,

You could even say Carter was more socially conservative than mccain,,,

Thus,,,, i'm sittin this one out.

Staying Home
Because the Republican party no longer upholds the principles of the Republican party.

My "loyalty" is to the principles that the party reflected, not to the party.

Unlike many of you media types... my job/income is not tied to a republican victory.

I'll not follow your advice based on some sort of Party-spoils program that we ordinary voters never benefit from.

When you have lost your way, sometimes you need to backtrack to go forward in the right direction.

Continuing down the wrong path out of "loyalty" is either folly or deceit.

Ronald Reagan wouldn't be President
If conservatives had not voted against Rockefeller Republicans sometimes, Ronald Reagan would never have been elected president.

If McCain can be a maverick disloyal to the Republican Party, then why can't we?

Reagan Would Do What Lincoln Did

I am as big a fan of the great Ronaldus Magnus as anyone but with all due respect Michael, John McCain is not a benign Gerry Ford and the internal Republican crisis is more serious than it was in 1976.

Gerald Ford had not done anything as egregious as McCain-Feingold or McCain-Kennedy. Had he, Ronald Reagan would not have dropped out nor campaigned for him. Ronald Reagan never supported traitors and would not do so today.

The perfidy to condemn McCain is in his own record for all to see. Michael, before you stump for McCain you should read the Senate debate on his bills. You will see McCain saying things that your father NEVER countenanced.

Ronald Reagan would do today whatever it would take to be himself the conservative alternative to McCain or he would support whoever could be that alternative because he would care more about the country than his party's unity which is exactly why Abraham Lincoln left his party in 1858.

Like Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln was an ardent party loyalist -- until his party went south, literally. Abraham Lincoln could not countenance a party platform that promoted the expansion of slavery. Morally, his party had left him so he left the party.

The Republican Party today is telling voters to elect a man who deliberately destroys the Constitution and the rule of law and who has no respect for the canon of founding principles that anchors this country's moorings.

No Michael, Ronald Reagan would take the moral road like that of his presidential equal of the previous century. And like Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan would get together with fellow contempory patriots such as Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, et al and lead the conservatives out of the tattered GOP tent into a new, bigger and stronger tent -- and watch the GOP tent collapse just as Lincoln watched the Whig tent fold.

The GOP has left conservatism. Conservatives should leave the GOP.

There Is Another Option

I am as big a fan of the great Ronaldus Magnus as anyone but with all due respect Michael, John McCain is not a benign Gerry Ford and the internal Republican crisis is more serious than it was in 1976.

Gerald Ford had not done anything as egregious as McCain-Feingold or McCain-Kennedy. Had he, Ronald Reagan would not have dropped out nor campaigned for him. Ronald Reagan never supported traitors and would not do so today.

The perfidy to condemn McCain is in his own record for all to see. Michael, before you stump for McCain you should read the Senate debate on his bills. You will see McCain saying things that your father NEVER countenanced.

Ronald Reagan would do today whatever it would take to be himself the conservative alternative to McCain or he would support whoever could be that alternative because he would care more about the country than his party's unity which is exactly why Abraham Lincoln left his party in 1858.

Like Ronald Reagan, Abraham Lincoln was an ardent party loyalist -- until his party went south, literally. Abraham Lincoln could not countenance a party platform that promoted the expansion of slavery. Morally, his party had left him so he left the party.

The Republican Party today is telling voters to elect a man who deliberately destroys the Constitution and the rule of law and who has no respect for the canon of founding principles that anchors this country's moorings.

No Michael, Ronald Reagan would take the moral road like that of his presidential equal of the previous century. And like Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan would get together with fellow contempory patriots such as Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, et al and lead the conservatives out of the tattered GOP tent into a new, bigger and stronger tent -- and watch the GOP tent collapse just as Lincoln watched the Whig tent fold.

The GOP has left conservatism. Conservatives should leave the GOP.

McCain says nothing for conservatives
"I think McCain needs to sweat it out for awhile and make a lot of concessions."

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/2 0080214/NATION/437382070/1002

John McCain's campaign directory said today that there would be no "pandering" (concessions) for conservatives.

McCain's neo-con (= liberal) group has thrown conservatives out of the party, saying we will be replaced with liberal independents and Democrats, as they create the new Republican Party.

He's right
You at least stand a chance with McCain.

An Obama or (an increasingly unlikely) Clinton presidency would yield hoardes of liberal federal judges, and from what I understand, the judiciary has always been a major beef with conservatives. It's obvious now that McCain will be your party's nominee, and he's already pledged to nominate judges in the Roberts/Alito mode. He's taken stands that have alienated some of you folks--but when has he actually gone back on his word?

Even if you discount all of that, ask yourselves this: If you knew then what you know now about President Reagan, would you have voted for him?

New Party
I learned this the hard way too, but just because you can't see your post does not mean it's not there. Just keep going out and coming back in until it shows up.

Big difference
between the 1976 election and today. Carter and Ford weren't running campaigns to start wars. McCain, by his intemperate comments, is.

As
someone said here, lets see how things play out.
That breakdown of pledged and unpledged delegates is interesting. I have said McCain is no sale, but there are conservatives who are
trying to get a Contract with Conservatives (GOPUSA) and have an online petition. This is to hold the nominee feet to the fire. They don't want to admit it in their arrogance but
look at all the talk about unity, trashing talk radio, Doles letter. That tells me they are running scared inspite of their big talk. I'm angry about members of his team saying they won't pander to Conservatives or they won't be
going after Obama. I don't want to be pandered to, I want results. It looks like the establishment republicans have more money than brains but they do know they have to call on the
conservatives among them to mollify us. Lets wait and see who the Veep choice is; and see if there will be an agreement with Conservatives.
They won't admit it publicly, but they NEED us.
this may sound ghoulish, but McC is 71 now, not in really good health so who's to say he will
have more than one term or even complete the first. The main thing we must remember is
we have to stop the B. Hussein Obama express and
the Hitlery trainwreck. There are even Democrats
that won't vote for her, maybe that's what the GOP suits are counting one, hence their contempt for us. A case of counting their chickens before they hatch.

Sophistry
The "if" game is fun to play, but your scenario is wrong. It doesn't matter if you father would support McCain. Let's play Harry Turtledove and see what happens if Ford had won in 1976:

Ford, being another McCain who after he left office spent more time with Democrats than Republicans (like George I... seeing a pattern?), would have done little different than Carter did. He was no great inspiring leader like President Reagan. He was an inarticulate liberal-lite.

The seeds of what Carter made worse had already been planted. Ford might have done better than Carter did as President.... and then in 1980 would have gotten the blame and instead of the Reagan Revolution, we would have had another Democrat in the White House anyway, without the 8 years of President Reagan, however.

Michael Reagan, you, like so many other milquetoast Republicans, make the assumption that McCain and Ford both would have implemented conservative policies.

Get this through your skulls:
MCCAIN WILL NOT IMPLEMENT CONSERVATIVE POLICIES, BECAUSE HE IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE.

Look at his track record; appeasement of Democrats, opposition to tax cuts, disapproval of conservative judges, focused on amnesty for illegals, infringing upon the 1st Amendment in the most egregious way possible.

So, no, I am not giving up supporting a conservative agenda to teach the Republicans a lesson as you all keep pretending. I'm giving up nothing, because a vote for McCain is a vote for a liberal, just as much as a vote for Hillary.

Get it yet? We conservatives are not sacrificing a thing by not voting for McCain, because if we vote for him we get nothing we wouldn't get from Hillary or B. Hussein Obama.

Wu Wei
I know that McCain is stubborn but if conservatives keep showing up for the primaries and keep his delegate count down they will have some leverage. The movement would need a leader to go to the convention to make a lot of noise about what needs to be done. It is unacceptable that 1/3 of the party can lock out the majority. I could accept it if the guy who did this was a conservative because he would be generally acceptabel to most of the party. But to allow a member of the minority to play tricks with the system to lock out the majority is suicide for the party. Put bluntly, we were effectively disenfranchised and he needs to pay for it.

I think you are right that McCain will make no concessions because he is more arrogant and pig-headed than Bob Dole ever dreamed of being. But it is still imcumbent upon us to make the case and fight the fight. When he goes down in flames we can pick up the pieces and move forward.

Greg B says
"I, for one, am tired of Michael speaking for his father. In fact, I suspect RR is also tired of it."

So, you scold Michael for speaking on behalf of his father, and in turn, you speak on behalf of his father as well....sigh.

I admire Michael for speaking out on this issue, because this election is probably this most important one we will ever see in our lifetime.

It has nothing to do with skin color, gender or age. It has everything to do with what can potentially kill, and I mean literally, kill this nation. The Obama Plan of Hope will kill us and this country. Reagan would know this and of course his son knows this.

None of us truly like McCain, but it would be absolutely ill advised to stay at home and not vote---at least to try to take our congress back.

Read the article here about The Real Obama. Then you decide what you think RR would do. I'll tell you what, he would be McCain's cheerleader.




Re: Tea Party 3:36 PM
My vote is not for sale and can not be bought with promises. Actions speak louder than words.

Defeat McCain!!

Your father would back Ron Paul
Just as he did in 1978. Remember that, Michael? Or did that slip your mind in the rush to anoint McCain as the next Emperor.

Here:
"He's taken stands that have alienated some of you folks--but when has he actually gone back on his word?"

He gave his word when he took his oath of office, to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Two words for you: McCain - Feingold.

"An Obama or (an increasingly unlikely) Clinton presidency would yield hoardes of liberal federal judges, and from what I understand, the judiciary has always been a major beef with conservatives. It's obvious now that McCain will be your party's nominee, and he's already pledged to nominate judges in the Roberts/Alito mode"

Just how did he phrase his "pledge"? He likes to parse his words so that it sounds like he's doing the right thing, but doesn't have a to break a promise because of how he worded it (example: his continued stand on amnesty).

He is already on record saying that Alito is too conservative. What's he going to do, nominate me, Adolf Hitler, or the head of the KKK to the Supreme Court? Then he can say, "I tried to appoint conservative judges, but the Congress blocked me"... and has kept his pledge w/o keeping it, simply by offering up nominees he knows won't get through, and then can run through liberal judges which will get through.

That's why I am now convinced that, although I will vote for Hillary or nobody if McCain is the nominee, I will strenuously support the most conservative candidates for the Congress and Senate I can find.

Before anyone starts defending Dole
Read the book Bob Dole: American Political Pheonix. It was written by one of his former staffers.

Michael - Part 1,
What did your father say about Simpson/Mazzoli in retrospect? In a time of war, why aren't the ports and borders secure?

You ever read the Koran? Guess what? Islam is incompatable with the western liberalism (the good kind). If the primary function of government is to keep its citizens from dying violently, then the "War on Terror" can be won by removing visa's of people from mostly-Muslim countries, and placing a moritorium on all immigration from mostly-Muslim countries. We've done just the opposite. Remember, Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslim...and I sure as hell can't tell the difference between a Muslim and an apostate, can you?

Why did Rumesfeld cover up Able Danger? Why did Rep King stop investigating Able Danger? What happened to Lt Col Shaffer? Why did Republicans allow Jamie Gorelick onto the 9-11 Commission rather than being questioned by said commission?


Michael - Part 2
Do you have any evidence at all, other than McCain's word, that he'll nominate and fight like a rabid pit bull for strict constructionist judges?

If I'm not mistaken, the oil embargo caused gas lines, not Carter. And in case you forgot, Nixon's disasterous economic policies (guns-n-butter) ushered in the bad economy Carter inherited. Don't get me wrong, the worst thing in the world is to elect a limp-wristed castrati to be Commander-in-Chief, but to say that he's worse than Wilson or FDR is quite a stretch. Wilson gave us the income tax (now 16,000 pages long) and FDR gave us a welfare state that has destroyed liberty and personal responsibility, and is rapidly bankrupting the nation. And to say Carter is responsible for Iran's mullah-ocracy is rather simplistic as well (again, read the Koran). Muslims are who they are.

Also, four years of Carter gave us eight years of Reagan. Two years of Clinton and a Democrat Congress got us ten years of a GOP Congress. Why'd the GOP lose? Because they compromised their principles and accepted Bush as the leader of the party. In all those ten years, the only meaningful liberty we got out of the GOP is the abolishment of the 55 mph speed limit.

McCain is slow death by poison, Obama is a bullet to the head. I compromised my principles in '04 and voted for Bush (That reminds me, what did your father think of GHW Bush? Be honest.). I'm making the stand now: I'd rather die on my feet, than live on my knees. I hope you McCain voters have a good pair of kneepads and a tube of lubricant. The only thing I'm going to lube is the slide on my sidearm.

Thanks
It is really easy to see the dem crazies on this blog. Thank you for saying what has needed saying. This election is not about conservatives and whether they are worthwhile or not. It is about what will take place in the future - trillions of dollars in health care (where is that money); the safety of this country; cutting spending; right to life; and the Supreme Court. There is only one choice for President. Republican and no amount of crazy will con me into not voting or voting for the deranged party. I am a Republican; I vote Republican.

Political Parties Are Not Religions

There is nothing sacred about the Republican Party or any other political party. Why all this hand-wringing about "party unity". Unity with the likes of McCain or Olympia Snowe? Phooey!

A political party is an arbitrary arrangement of like-minded people who agree to pool their resources and votes to further common goals.

Ask yourself, "What do you have in common with the GOP?" Think back over the past few years and answer the following:

1) When a Republican is attacked does the Party support the person? Should we ask Trent Lott, Tom Delay and Newt Gingrich?

2) When the Elephants controlled Congress did they open ANWR, repeal anti-oil refinery and anti-nuclear plant regulations? Did they curb junk-science environmental whackoism?

3) Who gave us the EPA, OSHA and Title IX? Which party was it that didn't have the guts to convict the impeached Clinton. Who made up the gang of 14?

THE GANG OF 14!

That alone should have blacklisted McCain forever within the GOP. Did it? Nope. Why? Because the fops running the GOP are spineless dunderheads. Imagine if John McCain had defied his party as a Democrat. He would have been excoriated in an instant! Not only was he allowed to stay in the Republican party but he and his fop supporters now have the audacity to lecture those he stabbed in the back on PARTY LOYALTY! Outrageous!

John McCain's groveling for the conservative vote shows that the jellyfish fops of the GOP will run to get inside a new tent once they see that it is popular to do so.

Of course, the defining characteristic of a new party is that people can only gain entry by agreeing to uphold the principles of the party.


You neglect to mention
That Ford was right of center and did a good job with the situation he inherited. He was particularly good at vetoing exhorbitant spending bills that the Democratic Senate and House sent him.

McCain on the other hand has gone out of his way to alienate what should have been his core constituency. For that reason alone he has just about as much chance of winning in November as a snowball has in the desert. That is even before the DNC attacks him on his temperment. If McCain had any sense of regard for the country he would withdraw. Instead he feels he is entitled to the nomination, and doesn't care if his selfish motivations drag the country down with him.

3 remaining candidates are puppets
Only Huckabee and Paul represent "We the People". All others are beholden to the Washington/Wall Street puppeteers.

Huckabee is still a viable "conservative" candidate. What is it with people?

If McCain is unable to win enough "bound" delegates in order to prevent a brokered convention, wouldn't that say something? Who would have the momentum? Think McCain could out-debate Huckabee on issues?

Why do yo suppose Washington/Wall Street are so happy with McCain? He is "one of them!"

People need to pull their heads out if they want to save our country. All of this unhappiness with McCain but folks aren't willing to do something about it. Very disappointing...

Romney
Romney just endorsed McCain and will release his delegates to him--making him just 78 short of the number needed.

I guess all you waiting for the great conservative hope (aka Huckaberry) to save you from McCain can call it a day now.


McCain has it wrapped up
"I know that McCain is stubborn but if conservatives keep showing up for the primaries and keep his delegate count down they will have some leverage."

It is not possible for anyone besides McCain to get a majority of the delegates anymore. Hucakbee has been mathematically eliminated.

Also, Romney is endorsing McCain today, which will McCain almost over the top, assuming Romney's delegates switch too.

It's a good idea, but it's too late and none of the party insiders want a brokered convention.

Great column, Mr. Reagan!
I don't like John McCain, either, but I do plan to vote for him if he gets the nomination. With all due respect to my fellow Republicans, I don't see the point of cutting off my nose to spite my face. That's basically what we'll be doing if we sit this one out.

Oh please
VT_Knight, you have got to be kidding. Huckabee is not only not conservative, but he is dishonest and lacks good judgement. Anyone who flip-flops on most major issues, allows over 1,000 convicted criminals to be released, destroys computer hard drives to cover up criminal activity, and enriches himself using his public office has no business being elected as dogcatcher.

Greg
Read what I said, My vote isn't for sale either.
But I won't sell it to the DemonRats either. I don't like McCain at all. I would love nothing better than a brokered convention..or that out of the ashed of the GOP a new conservative party would arise. That doesn't solve our delimma now, we've been snookered. I almost didn't vote in '06 but I decided to because I didn't want to be a party to having the drug addled demonRat leadership take over this country.
I'm talking about putting pressure onthe suits, not caving in; I may yet write in another candidate, I don't know. I've said I won't vote McC. The arrogance of some of his advisors aren't helping matters that's for sure. I'm
just saying lets not cut our noses off to spite our faces, we need a GOP Congress because as it stands now, he's gonna lose big. We conservatives have to become modern day minutemen and make a stand at the bridge, that being NOT staying home pouting, but going out enmass and vote at least for the down tickets.
With the DemonRat Congress at such low approval rates we do have a chance to take at least one house back. If we stay home, it's surrendering
not only to the DemonRats, but to alqaeda.

McCain is a Democrat
John McCain is a Democrat who calls himself Republican. He legislates with Democrats all the time; he was the Democrat's first choice for vice president in 2004; Democrats have asked McCain to switch parties many times.

McCain is also going to run a Democratic / liberal Republican administration, just like his coalitions when he was a Senator.

So I don't buy the scare tactics. The country would be in much more danger with McCain as commander-in-chief because:

He is soft on terror, like all Democrats
McCain has an uncontrollable temper and is mentally ill
McCain is a liar who no one can trust

Re: Shells 3:42 PM
Shells - you probaly can't help yourself, but, don't be a dumb*ss. One was speculative in nature, the other was stated as fact. That you can't make the obvious distinction comes as no shock.

Go ahead and knock yourself out...vote for your boy McCain. I can't, I won't...I respect myself.

Defeat McCain!!

I always vote for conservatives
This is an easy decision for me, because I only vote for conservatives, even if that means voting third-party or writing a name in.

I didn't vote for John McLeftist in the primaries, and won't vote for he, Hillary, or Obama in the general election. I'll vote for a third party conservative for president.

Some would argue by voting for a conservative that I'm voting for a liberal Democrat, but as the words sound, that is ridiculous. I never vote for liberals so it's never my fault if one gets elected. That just means I got out voted.

The ones who are trying to elect a liberal are those who vote for McCain, not me.


Et Tu
And you Michael, will you to betray the cause of the Taft/Eisenhower/Goldwater/Reagan movement of this nation. I was disappointed when Sen. Phil Gramm backed McCain. Why you?


Jackie
"This election is not about conservatives and whether they are worthwhile or not. It is about what will take place in the future - trillions of dollars in health care (where is that money); the safety of this country; cutting spending; right to life; and the Supreme Court."

I agree. Instead of wasting this money on a national health system I would rather waste in on another war in the Middle East.

Actually, I would rather it not be wasted for either of these noxious purposes.

BTW
I don't intend on staying home. Conservatives get my help and my vote.

Hayek said it best, "Socialism is slavery".

The Plumber says, "When good compromises with evil, evil wins. When Right compromises with Left, Left wins."

No more compromise. I'm writing in Duncan Hunter. McCain and the GOP can go to hell.

If you can vote for McCain

over Huckabee, your cries of concern for the future of this country ring very hollow.

McCain is the one who rejects

American principles of faith, family and freedom.

He rejects faith when he denies all men are created equal.

He rejects family when he refuses to protect marriage with a constitutional amendment.

He rejects freedom when he passes laws prohibiting free speech and seeks to outlaw gunshows.

You are quite bold to tell Huckabee supporters that rejecting McPain is bad for our country considering what McCain stands for.

If McCain is good for America, I would hate to see what you think is bad for America.

Tea Party 4:01 PM
I hear ya. I certainly won't sit it out. Just no way in hell I'd vote for McCain. These dolts that think he's the answer to the problem really p*ss me off. I have little patience for them.

Defeat McCain!!

Greg B
It was you that couldn't help yourself, and I just felt it took someone who is less than a dumb*ss than you, to snap you out of your Gotcha tactics. Splitting hairs and mincing words to prove absolutely nothing against some one who will not write you back is weak and cowardly.

So is staying at home and not voting. I can understand disliking McCain and not pulling the lever for him,but not even for your own party to take back congress?

Did you even read the article here on TH , The Real Obama?

Romney

ran as a conservative. Many of the people who voted for him, did so because they thought he was a conservative. His delegates are entitled to reject McPain who is anything but a conservative.

I see common sense
is slowly taking root around here. That is as it must be, no matter how much you or I may dislike McCain.

For you immature hard cases, go ahead, take your marbles, and run along. You obviously lack the judgement needed to make difficult decisions. You prefer to whine and cry about the perceived injuctice of it all.

As for me, I'll vote for the Republican nominee, as opposed to running headlong off the cliff into the waiting arms of socialism.

Forget it
Hey, Reagan....I don't care what your daddy would do...the dummy got fooled into selecting Bush as his VP....and the mole James Baker fooled Reagan. Give it a rest, we are not voting for a fraud, who called honorable vets(swiftboat vets) dishonorable and dishonest......take your Reagan junk and shove it.

If Gerald Ford
was elected in 1976 we wouldn't have won the Cold War so quickly because in one of the debates Gerald Ford said there was no Soviet threat so he would the continue the policy of detente. Vote for Constitution Party!

Romney's delegates are free
Romney can't make his delegates vote for anyone else.

There is no chance of a brokered convention, and of it choosing Huckabee though. If Mike wanted to be a consensus candidate chosen by a convention, he should have made friends with the groups in the party instead of enemies.

The anti-McCain percentage will increase
I think the anti-McCain coalition will grow, not shrink. McCain is a creation of the liberal media, and they will turn against him after the nominees are chosen.

McCain's wild temper, his record, his flip-flops, ... It will all finally come out instead of being covered up.

Instead of the phony image of St. John the Maverick POW who can't lie, he will be Psycho John the Double-Crosser & Liar.

Shells
No, I did not read it. Why should I? You seem to think that this crap Michael Reagan wrote is good. No thanks, I will not compile my reading list based on your recommendations.

I can tell by the terminology you use - gotcha tactics - that you must be a democrat. It figures...

Me a coward? You don't know me...and Michael is more than free to reply and engage me on this issue. However, I doubt he'd do any better than you have at convincing me.

Defeat McCain!!

Greg B
"I can tell by the terminology you use - gotcha tactics - that you must be a democrat. It figures..."

Again, you've proven you are the champion dumb*ss and I by far can never reach your loftiness.

I have been a conservative ever since I collected my first paycheck at the age of 15 and learned what taxes did to my earnings and where the money was going to.

I am voting to take back congress, which means a majority of R's....or did you not read what I wrote?

And as you stated, you also won't read The Real Obama article here on TH. Why? Because I recommended it? Pretend I didn't and read it. Or do you refuse to learn about the person you're allowing into office by not voting?

Truth hurts, and the truth is and you must know, despite McCain's blunders, what Obama plans for us all will turn this country into a living replica of Atlas Shrugged...or did you refuse to read that as well?

Go ahead, don't be informed and don't do a darn thing about it. Be a lummox. You're good at that.

Political Karma
He who votes for liberal Republicans gets more liberal Republicans

He who votes for conservatives gets conservatives

He who votes out of fear loses

Live free or die!

Thanks Michael
When this subject came up earlier in the week, I said that had Reagan and Goldwater been alive, they both would have endorsed McCain. Of course I was chastised and said how do you know? Same way Michael Reagan knows; based on prior actions of Ronald Reagan. This infighting between the right wing ideologues who are insisting on some sort of purity test needs to stop. McCain is the man - the voters have spoken. Reagan would want the Republican faithful to get behind the parties nominee. O

Moderate vs. Communism
As a Texan, I'll probably vote Huck in the primary to make a point that conservatives aren't happy. McPain will still get the GOP nod. I'll vote for him only to prevent the commies from trying to ruin this great nation!!!

Don - shame on you
"You obviously lack the judgement needed to make difficult decisions"

How difficult is it to give in and join the crowd, Don? Aren't we always telling our children that following the crowd is easier, but they should use their judgment and do what's right?

I have exercised my judgment and made a difficult decision. A VERY difficult decision.

Nearly half the country supports the Democrat candidates. That's nearly 50% of the population that's either insane or incompetent or both, by my way of thinking.

Now the Republicans trot out this liberal, and expect me to support him. At least 1/3rd of Republicans support McCain, and probably another 1/3rd will support him once he's the nominee.

So something over 80% of the population supports liberal candidates. That isn't a trivial thing in a democracy. I'm supposed to vote for who you say is the least liberal and then expect the 80% to receive some miraculous cure or epiphany and turn conservative?

No, better to let them put Obama in the White House and let the country be destroyed. From the ashes will come hard-headed, newborn conservatives who for a generation or two won't buy the liberal tripe, and maybe we can build a sane country, where most of that 80% has learned what we conservatives knew all along.

If not, the people in a democratic process have the right to have the President the majority wants.

I have shared my line of reasoning. You may not agree with my premise or my conclusions, but stop pretending that somehow I'm not exercising judgment.


I would like to kindly remind everybody:
I TOLD YOU SO!

I told you that Townhall was going to start an intensive PR campaign to "makeover" John McCain's image after his public pummeling (Ann Coulter didn't get this memo... you'd better set her straight Townhall!)

Those talk-radio guys (Rush, Laura, Sean, Hugh) simply did too much damage. When Mitt was still running, they trashed & spewed at McCain much worse than if he were simply a democrat (talk-radio listeners know this is true).

So now, TH has to work double-duty to get all you guys on board! The talk-radio people figured early on that Mitt was the guy & on the SLIGHT CHANCE chance that McCain did get the nominee....well, you all could be manipulated back into supporting him (For all you not on board yet... YOU WILL BE!...."national security" will be invoked! The Islamo-terror threat! You guys all end up puckering for that. You'll get manipulated into submission in the end!)

Michael Reagan Growing Up
Well, Michael Reagan is growing up now after his previous rants and and anger and mischaracterizations about Mac. Wonder if Rush cold hit puberty any moment now and grow up as well?

The same old song
"I told you that Townhall was going to start an intensive PR campaign to "makeover" John McCain's image after his public pummeling..."

Yup, happens every election. A RINO, a liberal Republican is chosen. Then the campaign by the liberal Republicans who control most of the Republican media begins. All discussion of the candidate's flaw stops.

The scare tactics begin: demonizing the Democratic opponents, pointing out that presidents appoint judges and are commander-in-chief. The RINO party leadership then says that THIS election is special, that this is the ONE AND ONLY election in which conservatives should hold their noses and vote for the liberal Republican.

But the same thing happening during every election for the past 20 years, since Ronald Reagan retired.

Instead of ending up with a conservative Republican Party, which we once had, we conservatives are now being kicked out of the party by a bunch of cross-over Democrats who disguise themselves as "neo-cons". Voting for liberal Republicans just makes them stronger.


Mccainiacs
The deal is conservatives who are more than lock step republicans - and who are willing to rise above deification of Reagan - including his son =- need to get this right - it doesn';t matter what Reagan would do NOW. Drum roll please - for some reason Reagan betrayed conservatism as a code of conduct or guideline for limited government, small government, the day he chose George HW Bush as his VP. At that point conservatism was show the door. Reagan was a great man for his time. Perhaps he believed that he could change or influence the BIG government wing of the party. He couldn't to any extend that mattered. Therefore, conservatives must ask -- are they Rockefeller big government hacks first or are they limited government conservatives with principle. The thing is -- we all need to make up our mind and stop trying to fit two pipes made of different stuff. It is called the dynamic fitting factor - pound on two pipes that don't fit until they do. When the first freeze comes the burst and no longer hold water. Frankly, as a conservative FIRST and an AMerican before that I can no longer take the beating by the republican establishment even when Michael Reagn is gonig the beating. Reagan caved to Rockefeller wing -- and it cost US the soul of the party and is well on the way to making conservatism that means squat look like a red headed step child with a despotic step mother. Third party in the fall for pres and thereafter -- vote for conservatives in the state, local and federal elections. No one has to stay home or sellout principle - that is yet one more false choice served up by the establishment that I can not keep down any more.

Shells
If you are a true conservative, a courageous conservative, a far-sighted conservative, an independent-thinking conservative, a patient conservative, how do you reconcile voting for McCain? Or are you motivated primarily out of fear? And to think you had the audacity to suggest that I was a coward. How wrong you are.

I'm gonna give you the last word. I've wasted too much time on this and need to get some work done. Good luck and fight on.

Defeat McCain!!

Humble Pie...

Humility makes a great leader... John is learning his lesson slowly, but surely.

I have to confess, John's pummeling by the right made him a better man, and our "Party of Prosperity" much stronger.

Look at the other side... (squint if you must)

Obama has never been challenged, Hillary cries a lot.

The left are wimps!


The voters have spoken...?
"McCain is the man - the voters have spoken. "

Yes. 1/3rd said they favor McCain, 2/3rds said they favor somebody else.

The voters have spoken, therefore, McCain should bow out.

Michael Reagan
I might hold my nose and vote McCain in November. It will depend on the international situation at that time and the democratic nominee's positions at that time.

It is much more complex than simply toeing the party line and you know it. If the party still stood for my values mostly, that would not be a problem. I have supported republicans, sometimes reluctantly, for the very reasons you cite for a long time. This year is different. The problem of the party moving left is getting worse and this year the transformation appears almost complete. I cannot support that.

I registered republican because they most closely mirrored my values. They no longer do so.


Rush Limbaugh vs McCain
Someone should call Rush Limbaugh and tell him to untie the 1/2 of his brain he has tied behind his back. He needs it on the McCain issue. He is relentlessly bashing McCain and is far from fair and balanced. Many conservatives hold up Ronald Reagan as the perfect conservative. There is none. Reagan was a great President but far from perfect. He passed the 1986 Illegal Alien amnesty bill. It was the gate opener for the 20 million illegals we have today. He appointed two arguably liberal Supreme Court justices, Sandra Day O'connor, and Anthony Kennedy. He increased income and gas taxes at one point in his term. He also sold arms to Iran. John McCain has a lifetime conservative score of 83 out of 100 by the American Conservative Union. Hillary Clinton has a 9 and Obama has an 8. McCain is pro-life,pro-family, will extend tax cuts, will protect us from terrorists and finish the job in Iraq. He admits the amnesty bill was flawed and will fight to protect the border first. Someone should tell Rush this is not about him (and his ratings and income), but about what is best for the Country.

Romney Throws Support to McCain
BOSTON - Republican campaign dropout Mitt Romney endorsed John McCain for the party's presidential nomination and asked his national convention delegates to swing behind the likely nominee.

"Even when the contest was close and our disagreements were debated, the caliber of the man was apparent," the former Massachusetts governor said, standing alongside his one-time rival at his now-defunct campaign's headquarters.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23168380/

Michael, we can never know
the outcomes of a road not taken. Yes, Aquavelvadeen might never have come into power. It is equally unlikely that RR would have transformed the political landscape had Carter not failed so miserably.

And who is to say what bumbling Ford might have done, completely derailing any following Rep. Without Ford there would be no Carter, without Carter there might not be a Reagan. It is not unfair to liken McCain to Ford.

What other speculations can we make?


Greg B
Obviously, we both feel very strong about our party. We are on the same side but looking in opposite directions.

I was part of the Super Tuesday crowd on February 5th. I voted for Romney. I told all my friends and co-workers who would listen why it was so important to have him in office instead of Mccain and made them get out and vote, but most I know didn't but said they did. Alas....

Some think our party won't survive if we elect McCain, others like me feel our country won't survive if we allow Obama in.

We all want the same thing, but we have different ideals of getting it. Both ways are risky to be sure. Being an avid gambler, I feel in order to win what's best for this country right now at this very moment, is not to have a democrat as POTUS. Odds show to me that if we rally Mccain there is more a chance we will have tax cuts, Bush's tax cuts made permanent, and government spending with be cut.

I am not a rich republican, I eek by all right, but I eek nonetheless. I cannot afford to have anymore taxes removed from my paycheck. I doubt McCain would do that to us, but I can guarantee Obama WILL and PLANS to tax us all to our limits, and I've already hit my limit. I am no victim, and I don't qualify in the eyes of dems for any freebies. I will be screwed. My company will be screwed. We all will be screwed.

So, we shall see. I read somewhere here you said you would vote for us to take back congress. I am hopeful you will do this.



What happened to Romney's spine?
"Republican campaign dropout Mitt Romney endorsed John McCain "

What happened to Romney's spine?

No way--
My entire family voted for President Reagan and I highly respect the man. But there is no way I will vote for mcshamnesty. I would not be surprised if he chose juan hernandez as his running mate. I am writing in Duncan Hunter. My feelings now is that we are about to be totally sold out by both parties.

Away with the republican party!
I will support a third party candidate. I can't take this hypocricy. It's sahmeful to see how these politicians try to manipulate the base. if there is no third party, I will stay home. Romney has truly shown that he is a calculative and ambitious politician for his own gain.

This race is still on.
Those of you who feel that McCain is your guy & the one to best represent you on issues and principals please vote McCain.

For the rest of you conservatives, you need shut out mainstream media mischaracterizations and consider Huckabee (www.mikehuckabee.com).

Romney may "encourage" his delegates to get behind McCain (what a sell-out to the puppeteer power brokers), and the “GOP Leaders” may have “called the race” for McCain but I don’t see the MSM news networks moving Romney delegates over to McCain yet.

Until one candidate gets the required 1191 of bound delegates required to win this is still an election (not a coronation). If some here are tired of discussing the issues you may as well take a vacation because this thing ain’t over. For those of you who feel that McCain doesn’t exactly give you the warm-and-fuzzies that you need, you are not alone. There is plenty of truthful information at http://www.mikehuckabee.com which I encourage you to watch and/or read.

History will either tell the story of the 2008 elections where the voters held their noses and accepted the candidate of Washington/Wall Street puppeteers or it will tell a different story… one of a courageous grass-roots fight against the power-brokers and against the odds where the people took back their nation.

Peace and hope,

YK

Give me Liberty or Give me Death!
What happened to our country's spine? How can we continue to tolerate this puppetshow? Do you feel that you have liberty now?

Those of you who feel that McCain is your guy & the one to best represent you on issues and principals please vote McCain.

For the rest of you conservatives, you need shut out mainstream media mischaracterizations and consider Huckabee (www.mikehuckabee.com).

Romney may "encourage" his delegates to get behind McCain (what a sell-out to the puppeteer power brokers), and the “GOP Leaders” may have “called the race” for McCain but I don’t see the MSM news networks moving Romney delegates over to McCain yet.

Until one candidate gets the required 1191 of bound delegates required to win this is still an election (not a coronation). If some here are tired of discussing the issues you may as well take a vacation because this thing ain’t over. For those of you who feel that McCain doesn’t exactly give you the warm-and-fuzzies that you need, you are not alone. There is plenty of truthful information at http://www.mikehuckabee.com which I encourage you to watch and/or read.

History will either tell the story of the 2008 elections where the voters held their noses and accepted the candidate of Washington/Wall Street puppeteers or it will tell a different story… one of a courageous grass-roots fight against the power-brokers and against the odds where the people took back their nation.

Peace and hope,

YK

McCain must Believe...

If McCain does not put his heart into "our" message...

He will not win!

Turn full circle John! Hillary will eat you alive. She is not your buddy. Hillary smells blood.

Turn right and clock her!

It's your only hope.




Carter stunk
but if not for him we may never have gotten Reagan in the first place. I lived through Jimmy Carter and I lived through Bill Clinton. My happiness isn't determined by who wins elections. That said, I also don't vote for liberals no matter what party they happen to infest. John McCain won't be getting my vote.

It's not a matter of who I agree with more, McCain would be the guy over Hillary or Obama in that case. It's more a matter of, "can I agree with this person on at least half of what they are pushing." In the Senators case, I cannot.

It looks like I'll be writing in Ben Stein or something.

The truth if the matter is
I see conservatives hating John McCain not so much for his voting record, but for his personal actions. McCain seems to make a point of occasionally giving the finger to his own party. Part of that "maverick" identity.

Another thing is: politics have become intensely partisan (on both sides). Many posters who show up at TH practically get off on that partisanship. McCain is not that kind of politician. He genuinely likes democrats. He drinks vodka Hillary (no joke). His friendships with Russ Feingold & Lieberman & liberal republicans like Arnold Schwarzenegger & Giuliani are well known.

I may be wrong, but I sense a real unwillingness by conservatives to "bridge the gap" with liberals like McCain has been doing for many years in Congress. McCain has never been with the "right wing" of the party....he's a centrist; he's one of the moderate senators that formed the "Gang of 14" in direct opposition to the more extremist elements (the "nuclear option" crowd). If McCain is elected, I'd wager by his past actions & the sheer force of his personality that he could - if not unite the country, at least start by uniting the Congress. Most senators on both sides of the aisle respect him.

This editorial is so very true!
Seems to me that it is palpably absurd to argue this article is about President Reagan per se or whether you like McCain, Huckabee, or someone else.

It's really about avoiding a repeat of the awful history surrounding the election of Carter and the subsequent fallout of that event. It's about uniting in support of whomever is the Republican nominee. I strongly support that (even though I have a substantial dislike for both McCain and Huckabee).

These are historic times. I believe the continued future prosperity of this country and the saving of our western culture depend upon turning back the sellout proposed by the Democratic candidates.

Let's be pragmatic and stop pouting in the corner because we don't get everything we want. Let's make the best of what we have and work together.


Conservatives need to show their

political strength and defeat Liberal John McCain. He does not have the nomination until he has 1191 delegates. Romney's delegates are free.

If conservatives refuse to vote for McCain, the odds are that he will not win another primary. This will give Huckabee such momentum heading into the convention that it will be very difficult to stop him.

Jazzbo
"turning back the sellout proposed by the Democratic candidates."

Which Democrat candidate? Obama, Hillary, or McCain.

Also, I ain't hiding in a corner. I'm walking down the street in broad daylight with a rifle on my shoulder and a six-shooter in my hand.

When Right compromises with Left, Left wins. I compromised with Bush in '04. Never again.

carlos
I don't think anyone is taken in by this nonsense that mccain and the missus clinton are buds. Unless mccain has been suffering amnesia he must be fully aware of the clinton tactics having resided in the congress before the clintons arrived in town. The senate lives with this silly myth they are all buddies when in session. But the media has shown how particularly nasty the dims have been over the years. My new take is that mccain is not going to disappoint his wealthy, former rodeo queen wife, who has her eyes set on the white house. Pleasing his wife will guarantee mccain will not go down without a fight

McCain on Valentine's Day
"He [McCain] genuinely likes democrats."

True, he just hates Republicans.

Statement by Mike Huckabee in Response t
Statement by Mike Huckabee in Response to Gov. Romney's Endorsement of Sen. McCain:


"I am seeking the Presidency because I care deeply about important issues facing America—Life, Marriage, the Fair Tax, the Second Amendment, American Border Security and Sovereignty. I am as committed to those issues as I ever was, and my campaigning around the country has convinced me that the majority of Republicans want me to continue to fight for these and other conservative causes. So I will.

I know all about the rumors swirling around. That's why I just went on national news show this afternoon, to knock those rumors down. I am still in this race. As I have said all along, I am in this race until someone gets to 1,191 delegates. That has not happened yet, and so I will keep campaigning for the Republican nomination. Period. That’s my ironclad commitment to my supporters."

Right about Dad, but wrong about reality
I am confident that if the situation were as Michael Reagan perceives it, Ronald Reagan would do as he says.

But the situation is not as Michael Reagan perceives it.

This car doesn’t need a tune-up it needs an overhaul.

And I don’t see how you can clean out the barn without holding the people who soiled it accountable.

There is a common thread running through all of these McCain articles: “Intra-party squabbles happen in every election, but once a decision has been made we should get behind the nominee.”

In most of the other articles the tone is condescending, and the labeling of what has happened as simply an intra-party squabble is insulting.

Certain forces that have gotten their hooks into the Republican Party haven’t listened to Conservatives for the last 4 years, and don’t think their views are important. No wonder they label this an “intra-party squabble”.

In Michael Reagan’s case, I think it is just wishful thinking…..cognitive dissonance…..call it what you will.

He doesn’t want to believe what has happened.

Yes, but would Reagan prematurely?
Ronald Reagan was the first president I really remember. He was great. I used to always watch his TV addresses. I knew what he was saying was very important. I knew he represented us in the best possible way with tough decisions that our country faced.

I do not think Ronald Reagan would be proud of folks trying to prematurely call this race. Why should anybody else? We should be sick that “the establishment” is trying to force a candidate down our throat with key states still yet to vote & no candidate with the required 1191 bound delegates.

Huckabee will fight until one candidate has 1191 bound delegates, period. If he is not the nominee he will throw his entire focus on getting the GOP nominee elected in the general election. If he is the nominee (i.e. brokered convention, huge grass roots momentum, etc.) than I hope the reverse happens.

Reagan was a peoples’ president. Huckabee will be the same.

http://www.mikehuckabee.com

Peace.

YK

Huckabee already lost
Huckabee already lost, and he is destroying his future in the party by pretending otherwise.

Huckabee does not suck up to the party!
Wu Wei, you are exactly right. Huckabee doesn't need to suck up to the party. The party stopped representing its constituents years ago so why should he suck up? To be beholden to the Grand Old Party like the other puppets?

If you still have a vote in an upcoming you should cast it for who you feel will best lead "We the People". If that is McCain, fine. If it is not McCain I urge you to give http://www.mikehuckabee.com a test-drive and some consideration.

Best,

YK

Never
Ronald Reagan was a party loyalist. I am a conservatist loyalist. I will not vote for a liberal Republican.

I am now an Obama supporter. He promises the quickest route back to popular support for conservatives. Just as Carter was necessary for Reagan conservatism, I pray that Obama will lead to an American awakening.

Hard to believe that we have once again fallen for the allure of socialism, but with the nomination of McCain, even Republicans have abandoned conservatism.

Ronald Reagan was a great man. He may have voted for McCain. He would have put Republicanism before conservatism. I will not.

Why Huckabee has lost
"Huckabee doesn't need to suck up to the party. "

How could Huckabee hope to win a brokered convention if everyone in the party hates him?

Have I gone MAD?
Or did you say Romney endorsed McCain?

Good thing Romney didn't the nomination then, if he is the sort of guy who will capitulate his principles so easily.

Rest assured I will not be so easily duped.

Maybe I will have to go the extreme measuring of endorsing Obama so you blue bloods can get the point.

You can bet your last long island tea I'm not voting for McCain, though.

Because he has a better messsage
And because he is a better messenger.

When Huckabee is able to get this to the convention it will be with grassroots momentum in his sails. He will have more delegates and he will have influence. He relies on "We the People" to state our preference in the remaining primaries & for "We the People" to tell unbound delegates who we prefer.

The only way we get there is grassroots support. Stop telling me how it is impossible. Tell me whether you like Huckabee's stand on issues and his message.

Hope McCain has a nice celebration party
I hope he and the 13 other members of his gang have a real down home celebration after he FALLS ON HIS FACE THIS ELECTION.


Your a Reagan, but your no Ronald Reagan
Michael you have history to rely on to make claims this is what Ronald Reagan would do. In reality you don't know what Ronald Reagan would do in any situation other then guessing on your part. At no time can anyone say they know actually what someone is thinking or what they would do. You do this all the time. It's time for you to stop this using your father to make points, and you love making points especially when the critics are after Rush, Sean, Mark, and Laura. I haven't head Rush or any of the others say that they were not going to vote for McCain or stay home. Are you ready to dump Conservatism for John McCain. What would you dump if they asked you to Michael, just so McCain can win the Presidency. Do you see the Democrats ready to dump liberalism for Hillary or Obama. If you didn't see this as another opportunity to stay connected with the top GOP, then you would have understood the alarm many Conservatives have concerning McCain. Tell us Michale how you feel about the comment McCain supporters made to talk radio about Ronald Reagan. Reagan is dead, it's time to move on. Does this apply to you also Michael. Is it time for you to move on Michael and stop using your father to make points with the media.

Romney needs a spine transplant
"Good thing Romney didn't the nomination then"

Yes, a lot of people commented that the reason Romney didn't beat McCain was that he looked too weak. McCain was lying about Romney and all Romney did was look to the moderator for help.


McCain's not the man
Michael,

Your Dad is my favorite president of the last century. However, who he would have voted for is immaterial. It's who he would have supported from the beginning of this campaign season that is illustrative.

Ron Paul was one of only four congressmen who endorsed your Dad in 1976. He holds so many of the late president's beliefs that I believe that Dr. Paul is the Reagan candidate. It's a shame that you and Nancy didn't endorse him before the media began its blackout of the good doctor's message of fiscal sanity.

David Walker, our comptroller general and head of the GAO, recently appeared on 60 Minutes saying that if we don't stop spending the way we have been, this country will be filing bankruptcy within 10 years. Then the Iraq War controversy won't matter any more. McCain will not solve this problem because he is a NeoCon who will continue the Bush policies like the war, and he also supports amnesty.



I love Ronald Reagan
but I will never vote for McCain. Gerald Ford was a moderate but he did not continually snub his own party like McCain has repeatedly. He never considered switching to the democrat party. He didnt lie about his opponent like McCain did to Romney. I played along in 76 and 96-not this time! The Republicans nominated the worst of the candidates and have left me. Maybe they will listen to us in four years after they have lost the white house which is always what happens when they run a liberal.The Stupid Party!

Would Barry Goldwater?
--
What's the difference between a criminal malefactor and a prisoner-of-war?

Is John McCain capable of making the distinction?

Or did he bilge his Annapolis course in military law, too?

It sure as hell seems so, doesn't it?

A prisoner-of-war (POW) is an enemy combatant who is *NOT* considered (prima facie) a criminal unless there is evidence that he has, with malice aforethought, violated the laws of war.

And even if he can be accused of such violations, the process for leveling such charges, adjudicating them, and executing sentence upon conviction differ substantially from the purposes and usages of criminal law in these United States.

They are more akin to the purposes and procedures of military law, and continue so for good reason.

As a POW, a person may be incarcerated through the duration of hostilities. He may be paroled, exchanged, released, or offered the opportunity to defect to the ranks of his captor, but he has no right of habeas corpus, and no right to participate in a trial at law to determine whether or not he should continue in captivity or be released.

As an enemy combatant, he most certainly has no right to access such of his captor's military intelligence as may be pertinent to how he was captured.

To borrow an analogy, the Geneva Conventions do not constitute a suicide pact.

The enemy combatants held in facilities like those at Guantanamo are neither subject to nor entitled to consideration under the U.S. criminal code, just as John McCain was not lawfully subject to North Vietnamese criminal law during his imprisonment in Hanoi.

Somebody really ought to smash John McCain across the mouth to gain his attention and then appraise him of this fact.

Former Air Force Major General Barry Goldwater would have been eminently qualified to do so.

--

Liberal John McCain cannot win

the nomination if conservatives wish to defeat him. He does not have the delegates yet and he cannot get them unless disloyal or misinformed conservatives collude with him.

Yes...
your father would support McCain, since he is the ordained of the Republican elite, and, of course, your father was a part of that elite. We need someone better than McCain - OR your father.

Great Post Michael
The whining and simpering coming from some of these posts simply turns your stomach. People who can't come together as a team after the selection process is over are not team members and not part of any winning collaboration. What you said about Ronald Reagan wasn't your opinion, it was history. And, Ronald Reagan returned to win.

Those who choose to not vote in protest may have that right but should never delude themselves... they are now part of the problem.

Nice article Mike!
These "principled conservatives" are such hypocrites. They say they can't vote for McCain because he is not a true conservative. Yet, they voted for Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush2, none of whom were 100% conservative on all issues. And none of the Republican candidates in this nomination process were 100% conservative either. If they are true to their principles, they will never vote in another presidential election because there will never be a nominee who won't stray from conservative orthodoxy on one issue or another. They need to admit that are against McCain because they feel that McCain offended them when he supported the liberal side of some legislation and he hasn't apologized for it. They take it like a personal "hate crime" and opt to punish him over and above how they would treat any other Republican who sides with the liberal view on anything. These people are emotionally just like liberals. The conservative movement was based on the desire to make this country great through the sanctity of life, small government and a strong defense that allowed individuals to pursue unlimited opportunity. It is so maddening to see people who think selecting a president is all about a personal conservative litmus test - all at the expense of the country. McCain is a conservative and a Republican and is much better than the alternative to lead our country in a time of war. The Reagans get it. Hopefully, when the general election battles commence, it will become obvious that an Obama or Clinton presidency would be a disaster for the country.

McCain Adviser Won’t Fight Obama

Is this a problem for McCain?

ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: A top adviser to John McCain said Wednesday that he will step down from the Arizona senator’s presidential campaign if the presumed GOP nominee faces Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the general election.

“I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama,” said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR’s “All Things Considered.” “I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign.”

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/mccain-adviser-won t-fight-obama

Right on the Money
Rush, Ann Coulter, and the shreaking talk radio B Team.

Get on board, or this country get Obamo-sized.

They say McCain can't win
That's what they said about the NY Giants.

Re: The things change ..... .
"Sorry my friend, but the Republican party is no longer anything worth supporting. It should fold its tent and its members join up with the Democrats, who are also not worth an ounce of support."

Abraham Lincoln, before he helped found the Republican Party, was a loyal Whig. The only thing that will save the Republican Party is universal "term limits". There is something in the water inside the Beltway that longer you stay there the less these GOP legislators look like the Republicans the voters sent there. Don't believe me, just look McCain ACU vote rating in his last 2 terms in the US Senate. No wonder he authored legislation to help hide a candidates voting record during the 30 days before an election, when the electorate might be paying attention.

See: http://www.redstate.com/blogs/skey/2008/jan/26/about_that_ mccain_acu_rating

His 65 rating in 2006 (the latest year that these ratings are available) is worse than any Republicans except those liberal GOP Senators from the Northeast, and he represents a "Red State".

Amazing
There you McCain people go again. "McCain is not 100% Conservatvie, but neither was Ronald Reagan"?

As if voting for Ronald Reagan required the same surrender of pinciples as this vote would?

This is yet another attempt to trivialize what has happned. This is not a minor annoyance or "typcial intra-party squabble that happens in every primary election".

And Mike please, Conservatives are not hypocrites. The Republican hacks who write the above quotes are plenty capable of that.

This is one place where a free market principle holds for a government election. People must be held accountable for their actions, or they have no incentive to change their behavior.

If we reward these people with an election victory, why would these Republican hacks care about Conservatives any more next time than they do now?

Mike -


They need to admit that are against McCain because they feel that McCain offended them when he supported the liberal side of some legislation and he hasn't apologized for it.

Get on board with John
McCain or we'll find out what conservatism is not. Slaughtering babies; you know that Obama voted against the bill in Illinios (that later passed the US Senate 98-0) that essentially said if a baby was born alive in an abortion, you could not keep killing it thereafter. Obamacare; Barack Hussein's takeover of healthcare (see Hillarycare 1993 for more details). Surrender in Iraq; immediately in such as way as to assure defeat the most.

He will have Dem Congress so he likely will get much of his agenda through.

Re: Hysterical Historians
"If Gerald Ford was elected in 1976 we wouldn't have won the Cold War so quickly because in one of the debates Gerald Ford said there was no Soviet threat so he would the continue the policy of detente."

His actual quote was: "There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe and there never will be under a Ford Administration."

On the plus side his Chiefs of Staff were Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, who also served as his SecDef. On the negative side, his selection for VP was Nelson Rockefeller, which was probably the reason that Reagan challenged the sitting President for the nomination in 1976.

This cartoon says it all
http://www.townhall.com/funnies/2008/02/14/

thank you
thank you for expressing your opinion, michael.

i have not made my decision as to my vote. i will be, as i always have, following the election very closely, and i will make my decision when the time comes to make it. senator mccain has until november to earn my vote, just as your father earned my vote.

i do not cast my vote for a party, but for a candidate, i am a conservative, not a republican. when the time comes i will choose according to my principles, my values, and my beliefs, not according to the letter following the candidate's name.

i believe THAT is what your father would do and what he would ask me to do.

Mike - ''principled conservatives...''
--
"...[supposedly] need to admit that are against McCain because they feel that McCain offended them when he supported the liberal side of some legislation and he hasn't apologized for it."

Nah.

It's because - with McCain-Feingold most certainly - John McCain undertook with deliberation and malice aforethought the criminal violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Given that he's repeatedly sworn oaths to support and defend that Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, his criminality extends to the point at which he has plainly committed high treason.

It's not *JUST* that he's about as "conservative" as Josef Stalin, but that he's as thorough and complete a criminal as Waco Willie and The Woman With One Eyebrow.

The perception that "it's McCain's turn" (as the guy who came in second-best in the last GOP nomination fracas) or that he's the lesser of two evils (like half a glassful of cyanide won't kill you just as dead?) is "Rockefeller Republican" horsepuckey.

So if us "principled conservatives" want nothing to do with John McCain, what kind of conservative does that make *YOU*?

--

SJ DOC
You mean that having Rumsfeld, who should have been fired within one week of Tora Bora, was a plus?

--
Sorry, it was J.A. who said that.

Mike
Not Mike Reagan , the other one. It isn't the fact that McCain is not 100% conservative that most irritates us, it is the fact that he, John McCain, left the republican party a long time ago. He spoke openly of his contempt for social conservatives. He was going to bolt the party twice. That is something Ronald Reagan did not do. He also took every opportunity to fight against conservative republicans simply to gain favor with the MSM. Ronald Reagan didn't care what the media thought of him. He stood for what he believed and made believers out of us. John Mccain has betrayed us too many times.

As for Mike Reagan,,,,,,,,,,Yes your father would have endorsed the party candidate. But I don't have to and I am getting tired of being told that the fate of the world rests on my vote for McCain. It is the RINOs who have left us with this horrible choice and it will be their fault when Obama or Hillary becomes president. The very people who are now telling us that if we don't tow the party line the world will end, should have thought about that before they rigged the primaries.

Re: Lesser of two weevils
"McCain or we'll find out what conservatism is not. Slaughtering babies; you know that Obama voted against the bill in Illinios (that later passed the US Senate 98-0) that essentially said if a baby was born alive in an abortion, you could not keep killing it thereafter. Obamacare; Barack Hussein's takeover of healthcare (see Hillarycare 1993 for more details). Surrender in Iraq; immediately in such as way as to assure defeat the most."

Actually, Obama didn't vote against the "Born Alive Bill" in Illinois, he merely didn't vote, killing the bill by lack of a quorum for the "Culture of Death" and giving his fellow Democrats. Of voted in favor of the "Culture of Death" when in 2006 he voted with the Democrats for the Embryonic Stem Cell Research Bill. McCain also voted with Democrats in 2006 in defeating the Same-Sex Marriage Ban Constitutional Amendment. The same year the AR Senator voted with Democrats to require a 60-vote majority to cut taxes in the Senate. Also the same year he voted with Democrats against Border Fencing, and against an amendment barring illegal immigrants currently in the country from claiming Social Security credits. Finally, he supported Democrats in 2006 also voted with Democrats against Iran Sanctions. These are not all his "biparisan votes" that year, but you get the idea.

In 2006 GOP Senator John McCain was Senator Harry Reid's most reliable "Republican". Once elected President, how can you be sure that this George Soros supported "Republican" will not act like Democrat Senator he apparently is? I knew, you must have "Read his lips!"

Wu Wei
You have missed my point about the concessions. If Huckabee can go to the convention with a huge mass of delegates and persaude the Romney delegate to join him in a fight over the nomination process we might get some changes for future elections. This system that allows a guy with only 35% of the vote to get all the delegates in many states is screwed up. That's how we have been getting stuck with these not so conservative candidates because our vote gets split and a lib like McCain or the Bushes can walk away with all the delegates even though they don't even have anything close to a consensus. If the party forced a proportional system for awarding delegates conservatives would get the most delegates. We would probably see more brokered conventions but that would be better because then the libs would have to ally with conservatives to get anything. As it is, they get to walk away with the whole thing and thumb their noses at us.

How do we get McCain to and the RNC to reform the system? We threaten them with a 3rd party candidacy. That would be certain doom for the terrorist coddling Maverick RINO.

The election is about the future
This election is not about conservatives and whether they are worthwhile or not. Of course they are. As are the Evangelicals, and the moderates and, yes (gasp) the liberal Republicans. This election is about what will take place in the future - trillions of dollars in health care (where is that money); the safety of this country; cutting spending; right to life; and the Supreme Court. I don't like everything about McCain but that is also true of all the other candidates. Huck is just plain scary to me with his; "change the constitution to God's laws." That is a theocracy and we see how well that is doing around the world. In the end, there is only one choice for President. Republican and no amount of crazy will con me into not voting or voting for the deranged party. I am a Republican; I vote Republican. I will vote McCain in the primary because he is the best man for the job faults and all. It is my hope that he will be our candidate in the fall because I believe he can win.
Please take up the banner of convincing conservatives that the election is not about them or what they believe. It is about the future of this country.
Thank you for listening,

Jackie..
No, the liberal republicans are not worth anything. They are worth less than spit. Moderates are only slightly better.

Maybe Reagan would have backed McCain. Reagan signed a massive amnesty bill. Reagan destroyed billions of oranges to drive up produce prices in a New Deal-esque scheme to keep the farmer vote on his side. We know he was capable of violating free market principles and other conservative values. The fact that supporting McCain could have been added to the list of things he did wrong does not impress me. The man did not walk on water.

McCain is a pathological liar and an imbecile. You want to believe his lies out of some battered wife loyalty to the party? Go for it. THERE IS NO REASON TO BELIEVE HE'D BE ANY BETTER THAN OBAMA.

Conservatism was already a movement without a country. Now it's a movement without even a political party behind it. McCain and anyone who votes for him should just switch over to the Democratic party.

Re: Hysterical Historians
"You mean that having Rumsfeld, who should have been fired within one week of Tora Bora, was a plus?"

Why? As I recall the CIA with help from US SpecFor operators and a little Air Power, mopped the Taliban in what, 4 weeks? Help, the Ruskies spent 10 years, plus buckets of Afgan and Russian blood and could defeat the Afghan Mujahadeen, who had no armor, air force, and only a few Stingers.

Of course, Tora Bora was a great coalition victory for tribal militia freedom fighter forces (United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan, aka "Northern Alliance"), assisted by a handful of US, SpecOps, British SBS troops and some airpower, as they ran the Taliban out of Afghanistan into Pakistan. Now to see what a military debacle really is, look up the Khyber Pass, and what happened to the British Empire's troops there in May 1919, when "Every stone in the Khyber (was) soaked in blood."

Only someone who blogs on MoveOn.org would consider it a cause to fire the SecDef.

The future of the party
Well the election is about the future.

I've never heard of cleaning out the barn and getting rid of the refuse after an election victory.

The people who won have been told their doing a good, or at least decent, job.

The fact that there are differnet defined groups in the Republican Party does not take into account that Conservatives have been completely ignored for the last 4 years and their views considered unimportant.

The Party is too far off track.

Reagan Says
"and we got four years of Jimmy Carter, whose main legacy was to drive the Shah of Iran from power and create the Islamic Republic of Iran with a bunch of wild-eyed mullahs running the show."

That's pretty stupid - even for a guy named Reagan!

Tora Bora
Maybe Rumsfeld was a plus in 1976. He hadn't gone senile yet.

But you've got to be kidding about Tora Bora.

Cornering the enemy at Tora Bora was well done by our troops.

But I don't see how you can defend the strategy after they were cornered.

Nobody was trying to run anybody out of Afghanastan and into Pakistan.

People escaped into Pakistan -- an that was not in our interests.


Action says:
"As I recall the CIA with help from US SpecFor operators and a little Air Power, mopped the Taliban in what, 4 weeks?"

Mission Accomplished? Where have we heard that before?

"Help, the Ruskies spent 10 years, plus buckets of Afgan and Russian blood and could defeat the Afghan Mujahadeen, who had no armor, air force, and only a few Stingers."

Just billions of US dollars, training and weapons. It was Ronald Maximus who made bin Laden the man he is today...(he also sold weapons to Saddam AND Iran - Michael kinda left that out with his Carter jab...)

Ronald Reagan in 1976
Michael Reagan, that was a excellent column that you posted and thank you for reminding people of the magnanimous gesture that your father made to Gerald Ford in the national campaign of 1976 by working for him despite their differences. Maybe if Gerald Ford had not pardoned Richard Nixon so quickly, he may have defeated Carter and the country could have been spared Carter's mismanagement. But I also remember your father saying something about having had have been a former Democrat, that he could not in conscience vote for a national Democrat as they were too timid in foreign affairs and too socialistic in domestic matters. History has proven him correct.
I am a pragmatic voter first and, a conservative second, not the reverse. Many of these conservative leaders such as talk show hosts and writers idolize Ronald Reagan and speak of him in the most reverent of terms. But they choose not to look at the totality of Mr. Reagan's actions when they want to feed their own selfish egos as you point out so well in your column.They must look at everything Ronald Reagan did, not just what they want to see.
Republicans must unite behind the Republican candidate no matter what their differences. Personally, I vote for the Republican not for a four or possible eight year presidency, but at least for two Supreme Court justices who will sit on the bench for twenty to thirty years!
For the rest of the country's problems I'll let the President and Congress duke it out.That's their job. That's why we pay them the big bucks and benefits.
Regards,
Matt

McCain...
I hate McCain and refuse to vote for him but this is his most powerful endorsement to date by far and really makes me thing twice about my decision not to support Cain.

I do see this playing out like 76 all over again almost to a tee. Time will tell.

Re: Lesser of two weevils
"There you McCain people go again. "McCain is not 100% Conservatvie, but neither was Ronald Reagan"?"

Let's see McCain:
1. Supports the Global Warming Hoaks
2. Favors leaving political debate only to the NYT
3. Is against the definition of marriage that has been the standard of civilization for over 5,000 years
4. Thinks that human embyros are merely material for experimentation
5. Thinks that putting up a fense on our border would be too much of a burden for illegals
6. Think the bankrupt Social Security ponzi scheme can afford to record illegal workers
7. Opposes tax cuts using Obama-style "populist" rhetoric
8. Thinks that illegals should be rewarded by being placed at the head of the line for citizenship
9. His chief political advisor heads a George Soros supported organization that was that promotes "all the above" and was formed to insure that Florida voters will never again steal an election from "true believers" like Algore

Heck, John McCain isn't 100% conservative, he isn't even 10% conservative!

Re: Lesser of two weevils
"I hate McCain and refuse to vote for him but this is his most powerful endorsement to date by far and really makes me thing twice about my decision not to support Cain."

Our Nation can survive a President Obama, but the Republican Party will never survive a President McCain.

$.02
There seems to be an assumption that everyone is either a Republican or a Democrat. I left the Republican party after GHB took the helm and moved the party to the left. I voted for Perot and am damm proud of it. The Republican Party in my opinion is slightly right of the Democrat party. Since I'm not a Republican, I feel no compution to pull the lever for McCain. I will not sucomb to the fear of judges, socialism, etc. that the party hacks or screaming.
It's funny to see all the fake conservatives jumping on the McCain bandwagon out of fear.
I urge all true conservatives to step away from the Republican establishment and write in a true conservative. I myself will write in my own name, that way I know I voted for a true conservative.
Michael Reagan is a lightweight and is not a conservative. I would throw him in with the Kemps, Bennetts, Medveds and other non-principled Rockefellow weenies.

Nice Going Mike !!!
Mike it seems you have changed your tune somewhat in the past couple of weeks. It shouldn't surprise me but it does because I thought you were a Stand Up Guy, and couldn't be bought out or swayed.
I have not decided whom I will vote for on election day but I have decided several years ago that it would not be John Mc Cain. He along with George Bush and a Senate and House both Republican controlled have destroyed the Republican Party I have been a member of for 55 + years and I refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils any longer.
Also after the performance of Mitt Romney today in asking his delagates to support Mc Cain it further confirms my belief that the Republican Party elite are nothing but a bunch of phonies, and liars.

Re: Lesser of two weevils
"Personally, I vote for the Republican not for a four or possible eight year presidency, but at least for two Supreme Court justices who will sit on the bench for twenty to thirty years!"

Unfortunately, many "Strict Constructionalist" Judicial nominees of George the 2nd for Federal Appeals and lower courts, where they might get the experience necessary for a Supreme Court nomination, were not voted on BECAUSE of John McCain and his "Gang of 14". BTW, Sandra Day O'Connor from AR and Anthony Kennedy were two of Reagan's Supreme court choices. On the otherhand, Whizzer White, appointed by JFK, and William Rehnquist, appointed by "Tricky Dick" Nixon, were the only two dissents in the Roe v. Wade decision of the Warren Burger, also appointed by Nixon, lead Supremes.

John Acton
Do you have any idea how a situation got created where the Repuclian Party ended up with a nominee like this.

I mean, how did this happen?