Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Michael Reagan :: Townhall.com Columnist
Newt: A GOP Dark Horse?
by Michael Reagan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Fred Thompson's gone. Duncan Hunter's gone. All these people are gone. Huckabee could become Huckabeen -- gone by next Tuesday. So could Rudy after next's Tuesday's Florida primary.

All of a sudden you've got this Republican primary coming down to McCain, Romney and Ron Paul. With all this uncertainty, just where can a conservative go? All of a sudden radio talk show hosts, who reflect the opinions of grass-roots conservative voters, are all over the lot hammering on Rudy, hammering on Romney, hammering on McCain and hammering on Paul.

Listening to them you get an idea who they want or don't want. They don't like McCain. Most probably they support either Huckabee or Romney. Although they think Rudy is gone, he could come back if he wins in Florida next Tuesday.

If Huckabee is finished, I think they go to Romney, who is somewhat more conservative than the rest. At any rate, conservatives could be faced with backing either McCain, or Romney, or Huckabee or even Rudy.

Or they could end up backing none of them.

Who, then, could conservatives end up backing? Well, who recently has come out with a new book? Who's doing all the shows talking about his new book? Who is advocating common-sense solutions to the most pressing problems America faces?

Newt Gingrich, that's who. He was out of the race for a long time, he toyed with the idea of running until Fred Thompson entered the race, and then he more or less pulled back.

Why Newt? Ask yourself why Ronald Reagan won. He won because he was able to excite a group of people in America that the liberal wing of the Republican party has never excited -- the grass roots.

Newt Gingrich is the last Republican to have done that -- to reach out to the grass roots, to all those conservative Republicans and Reagan Democrats. Remember, it was Newt who engineered the miraculous Republican take-over of Congress in 1994 -- something that was deemed impossible two years after Bill Clinton won the White House.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was out there quietly working the phones and hoping for a wide-open convention where the delegates -- not the primaries that selected many of them -- decide for themselves who they want to carry the GOP banner in the presidential election in November.

If Newt throws his hat in the ring he knows that in the blink of an eye he will have the grass roots behind him.

Look at what happened Saturday in South Carolina. McCain won with 33 percent of the vote, which means 67 percent of the voters said we don't want McCain; only 30 percent said yes to Huckabee, which means that 70 percent said no to him. About 15 percent went for Thompson, a mere 14 percent went for Romney and 2 percent went for Giuliani.

So basically the voters said a resounding "No" to all of the above.

So who can electrify the base and get them to come out from their bunkers and ignite a groundswell? On the record, the only person capable of doing that is Newt Gingrich.

Covering all the issues that concern the grass roots: Romney represents the Reagan economic approach; McCain, the national security issues; Giuliani represents the hard-line-on-crime position; and Huckabee covers the religious position. Everybody has a piece.

Newt Gingrich covers all of those issues, and in the eyes of the grass roots, he covers them brilliantly. Just as his Contract with America dealt with many of the issues that concerned the grass roots and won Congress for the GOP, his agenda goes right to the heart of our current problems. He's offering concrete solutions to all the concrete problems and that's what the grass roots crave.

As a result, if the nomination gets thrown open in a brokered convention, the person who comes out of the struggle the winner will most likely be Newt Gingrich.

If I'm right I'll back him to the hilt. If I'm wrong I'll follow my dad's lead and support the nominee no matter who he is.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Reagan, the eldest son of Ronald Reagan, is heard daily by over 5 million listeners via his nationally syndicated talk radio program, “The Michael Reagan Show.”
Lets Draft you
Hey, why not get the real Reagan!!!!

We who grew up with your dad (I still have my old Campaign button) really want another conservative in office.

thanks

I have a dream...
Newt debating the Hildebeast with a panel of Michael Reagan, Russ, and Sean asking the questions.

My heaven.
Hillary's hell.

Run Newt Run.

Newt's Baggage
Newt will better better serve America as a resource for conservatives (as he brings his superior intellect to bear on the issues). He has an all too recent social history, too much like Rudy's. The Family Values folks won't join him.

Not so fast
Lately Newt seems to be following the fatal path George Bush Sr did in compromising his positions to accommodate extreme leftists. For instance, Newt, just as GWB has, has thrown in the towel on the America's fault global warming hoax. He seems to be joining the faith in government bureaucrat solutions crowd. No thanks!

Newt Is Smart AND Canny

Very, very little of what comes out of his mouth is political drivel. For years he has been the most consistently clear politician out there. He is not perfect and does have some baggage, but I would love to see it come down to a choice between him and Romney (now that Fred has stepped aside.)

If he got the Republican nod, he might even hold out for genuine debates as opposed to crass media side shows. THAT would be something to see!

Newt - Please Do It!
Newt - Please Do It! Otherwise I may not vote in the Presidential election for the first time since - gosh I forget - the early 60s!

Newt could save the GOP
Newt could beat Hitlery hands down and smoke B. Hussein Obama in a landlside.

Newt, run, for America's sake, run!

Don't ignore Paul
Well I think the analysis of Huck's supporters generally going to Romney is correct and I also don't see Guiliani going anywhere. However, if the race comes down to McCain, Romney, and Paul, there will be supporters from Thompson, Huckabee, and maybe even Guiliani that would support Paul, how many is unsure of course.

If Romney was a true limited government candidate, then he would do much better but he sounds like he likes mandating health care and other things. McCain has so many positions contrary to most conservatives on constitutional issues. If you look at Paul's comprehensive economic plan he put forward today http://www.ronpaul2008.com/Prosperity it looks pretty conservative to me.

I'm not saying he will win, but he came in 2nd in NV, it looks like 2nd in LA, and double the overall votes of Guiliani, so don't write him off yet.

What if
vamtns41 you have a conservative Congressional candidate who needs your vote and you don't vote? ditto Senator? Congress is down to 11% last I heard, so any candidate with a good conservative message that challenges the incumbent or is an incumbent should have a good chance of winning..if all of you who say you won't vote if the nominee for POTUS isn't who you back. Do you have to vote straight tickets in your state? I don't in mine. Leave it blank or write in. But at least vote for the down ticket candidates..if the demonRats get the majority plus the WH, we will be the former Republic that once stood.

The only spin faster is Dick Morris.
Newt and his self made
mirror got to close and
merged, now the mirror
immage of his dreams,
Newt/Newt sounds sort of funny.

Newt had a chance to do something about the RINO's and failed, grade F.

New blood, this old gene pool poll no workie.

Newt
Sorry Newt has the same negatives as Rudy, his personal life, be great him explaining in the middle of a debate how his philandering is different from Bill C.

False Premise
Mike,
I enjoy your radio show and have great respect for your opinions. However, this time you botched the analysis big-time. To suggest that a 33% vote for McCain is equivalent to a 67% vote against McCain is a false premise that ignores the fact that voters only get to vote for one candidate. It could also be argued that 67% of voters selected individuals that were more consistent than John McCain, or 70% of voters voted for candidates more fiscally conservative than Mike Huckabee, or 98% of voters voted for candidates more socially conservative than Rudy Guiliani. I would argue (without documented evidence) that there are many individuals for whom their second choice would be more than satisfactory. While I do not entirely disagree with your ultimate conclusion, I do caution you about building too much of your opinion on a false premise.

somewhat more conservative?
"If Huckabee is finished, I think they go to Romney, who is somewhat more conservative than the rest."

Mike, I love you man, but I guess you and I have a different definition of what conservative is. Ron Paul is the ONLY conservative in the race!

Nom. Gingrich and Winning Lotto Numbers
Wishful thinking. You're about as likely to get one as the other.

Still, wishful thinking is nice, especially when all you have to look forward to is another mortgage payment, or Romney/Giuliani/McCain getting the nomination.

Oh Please!
Gingrich has also made some stupid comments lately. What has Roney been smoking. Gingrich is out.

Newt the disgrace needs to stay HOME
NO
NO
NO NEWT either

He is no different than

McCain the back stabber who dumped the poor wife
for the MEGA rich trophy wife

YOU larry Criag, Tom Foley, McCain, Newt
two timmers are a disgrace to this nation
and to the consevatives

NO WAY will Mccian or a disgrace like Newt ever
get my vote

IT IS THE PRINCIPLE now

we want decent, respectable, honest, wholesome,

NO MORE SCORNED interns
dumping the wife
etc.

R U ALL NUTS?? or is it the WATER
are you all insane

NEWT
the disgrace

NOT A CHANCE

You are all having a mental breakdown

Newt already said no
This came up once before in the fall. Newt took himself out of the running, saying he just wanted to concentrate on his various think-tank projects.

To paraphrase Rumsfeld, we are going to have to go into this campaign with the candidates we've got.

Cancel the election
As an unhappy Republican voter, I'm not any more inclined to rally around Newt Gingrich than I am around any of the other unsatisfactory front-runners. However, even aside from my own opinions (which I don't claim are necessarily typical of anybody) I think that, if Gingrich does somehow emerge as the Republican nominee, the country could save a lot of money and effort by cancelling the November general election and immediately inaugurating the winner of the Democratic nomination (Hillary, Obama, or whoever). Gingrich may-- or may not-- energize the "Republican grass roots", but I think his appeal to the independents and possible crossover Democrats needed to win is zero. Or minus. He could be the reverse-Hillary, energizing the Democrats against him even more than they are energized already.

Newt Gingrich
If you think that a man who dumped his wife the day she had cancer surgery for the cute young thing can get Christian Conservative's vote for President, then you are living in a different America than I am.

It is too late for Newt
The ideal team would have been a Thompson/Gingrich team but it was not to be. It's too late now and besides, Newt has signed up for the AGW scam. But I guess since Fred was the only one who didn't sign up for that scam that really doesn't matter.

@buzzkat
buzzkat writes: Thursday, January, 24, 2008 4:47 PM
Not so fast
...For instance, Newt, just as GWB has, has thrown in the towel on the America's fault global warming hoax...

------------------
Hicks.

How can you look at the pictures of the pollution in Beijing and not be the least bit concerned? Are you aware that that pollution makes its way to California? Our demand for cheap goods is fueling China's growth. Of course, nobody can prove what is happening but many scientists find the evidence compelling.

I think the Republicans who have proven they only look out for themselves are just afraid that they will make a sacrifice for their children and future generations and what if it turns out to be unnecessary? Oh, my gosh, what a horrible injustice. The biggest injustice in the history of humanity. Boo Hoo.

I love Newt But..
He would be 100% more effective in a republican cabinet than in the Oval Office.


Oh please let it be true!
I wish this could be true. But my understanding was that for Newt to run he would have to let go of his bipartisan research and action organization he started up to tackle some of America's biggest problems. I understood that this was the real reason he chose not to run.

As long as we're day-dreaming here.....how about Condaleeza Rice for his VP candidate?

GeorgiaGal, are you absolutely sure about the cancer surgery scenario of Newt's first divorce? That's what I used to believe too but someone challenged me about it and now I suspect it's something manufactured by Clinton Inc.

In any event, if there were more true conservatives running, I would be a little slower to consider Newt because of his very less than stellar marriage record; however, we live in perilous times for our country. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate (although Ronald Reagan certainly came pretty close but even he had a few minor flaws and a few family issues of his own).

Because of these dangerous times, I'm looking for a true bona fide Conservative. That sure is not McCain. I just don't know about Romney (although I believe he's 100% better than McCain). I keep coming back to Newt. He's definitely a true Conservative. Like our beloved Ronald Reagan, he is also an outstanding communicator. He would definitely be able to clearly explain why the Conservative choice makes more sense for America.

ink og neato
""How can you look at the pictures of the pollution in Beijing and not be the least bit concerned? Are you aware that that pollution makes its way to California? Our demand for cheap goods is fueling China's growth. Of course, nobody can prove what is happening but many scientists find the evidence compelling.""

First of all ink, the Kyoto scam has absolutely ZERO effect on China or India. They were exempted from the treaty. So what is blindly following that overweight tenneseean going to do to address the pollution in china? Oh, and just in case you were unaware, Bill clinton refused to sign Kyoto, but suddenly bush is evil for not signing on to an economic death sentence for our country.

The total willful lack of logic in liberalism always astounds me.


$.02
Sign me up! Newt would get my vote and that's the only thing that will get me to the poll's. The Republican party is no more in my opinion. With the collection of moderates (liberals) running for president I see nothing to vote for or against. I say if the country is going to be destroyed, let the democrats do it. I don't trust Mitt, Rudy, Huck and especially Ted McCain any farther than I could throw them. Run Newt, Run. If nothing else we would get great theatre watching Newt and Hillabeast debate.

Newt - weak on defense?
Has anyone ever heard "Bill Clinton cut the defense budget"?

Guess who was Speaker of the House from 1994-2000. You got it, Newt Gingrich himself.

Article I, section 8, says "The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes....to provide for the Common defense and general Welfare of the United States". Newt controlled the outlays for the Department of Defense while he was Speaker of the House. We Conservatives need to look at the problems of the past with eyes wide open in order to solve the problems of the future.



WHAT IS THERE NOT TO TRUST
ABOUT MITT?

$.02
In my opinion Newt blew it as speaker because he got caught up in the celebrity of being Speaker. His holding daily press conferences and appearing all the liberal talk shows distracted him from the task at hand. Had he just paid attention to the job at hand he would have been successful. Rush warned the 94 class that the msm was not their friend and it was pointless to seek their approval. Newt should have listened.
That being said, Newt is brilliant and has tremendous ideas and given another shot I think he would act differently than when he was speaker. I think he's wiser. For the evangelicals out there, remember Ronald Reagan was divorced and twice married.

Newt time is gone
Newt is no longer the reduce the size of gov conservative he once was.
No thanks here.

Hmmm
Interesting take Michael. It is clear there are millions of folks trying to figure out how not to end up with a candidate that we have to compromise too much on. That is certainly the situation now with the four we have.

Somehow I think the press will bury Newt before the election. I imagine his negative polling numbers are very high and am not sure how he would ever overcome that.

Clearly this is what we may all have to do:

"If I'm right I'll back him to the hilt. If I'm wrong I'll follow my dad's lead and support the nominee no matter who he is."

Al Gore...

Isn's Al Gore the Dark Horsey with the broken spring?

I still find a few idiots hoping for President Gore. I give these stupids the same question that my mother gave us as children....

"Did you bump your head?"

No Newt
I like Newt but he turns into a quivering mass of jello in front of the Clintons. Basically a smart man but no backbone. He wants the Clintons to like him, really like him.

LucyGoosey
Condi Rice!? Are you crazy? Condi is clueless and speaks gibberish.

You've forgotten one thing...
Newt was unwilling to cut loose the 5013C affiliation he has to make himself a candidate! Mike.. do your research man!

Al "Wooden" Gore

Were he a Republican, would rank right about halfway in our current crop of wannabees.

The Democrat field is a very scary JOKE.

The Republican field is only slightly better (since Fred dropped out.)

The President's job is an EXECUTIVE job. That's why so many governors do so well and why legislators do not. The Republicans have two proven executives running in Rudy and Mitt. The Democrats have none. In fact Rudy and Mitt are the ONLY two grown-ups in the race in either party.

Still, I welcome Newt to run.

I love it, let's do it
Newt is my candidate.

PS But don't name your perfectly beautiful horse, "Newt".

Anybody but McCain
Newt would do.

No way in hell!
Ronald Reagan would ever support John McCain. I won't either.

We need a new choice
I'm not sure Newt's the answer, and it's for absolute sure none of the current idiots are. I can't believe that in this entire great country, there is not another brilliant, decent, honorable, true conservative who will rise before the convention. Pray without ceasing!

Huckabee is NOT a Huckabeen.
I love Newt, but I also think he's better as a resourceful, conservative leader and perhaps as a cabinet member. IMHO I think Huckabee is closer to Newt than any other candidate both on the issues and his solution oriented style of vertical leadership is very similar to Newt's transformational leadership style.

The latest from RCP shows Huckabee in 2nd nationally behind McCain and ahead of Romney.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/r epublican_presidential_nomination-192.html



Newt For Prez
Michael Reagan's article hits the nail on the head. Newt Gingrich NEEDS to jump in here and take the lead. These other guys don't have what we need, though they are great people.

Newt?
Newt is not a loyal man. No way. Let him serve in the cabinet if anything.

You want to know why good men don't run for office? Because the MSM slams them and rips up their every action. Why would a good man want that? And then people who read the press are only too willing to believe all the lies.

We are a tear apart society, not a build it up one. It's a crying shame.

We'd rather spin the gossip than find out and stand for the real truth.

Everyone nurses their favorite little bias.

I read and hear it every day.

Newt???
No way.... I can just see the mud flying now!

Newt and GW
How can you compare tax incentives to encourage cleaner emissions, which is what Newt wants and is a brilliant way to shut down the libs on this issue, to a carbon-credit extortion/profiteering/slush fund? Don't be a liberal's dream come true and act like the only thing to do regarding the environment is nothing. True conservatives must be good stewards. Do your homework.

Newt should be...
Chief of Staff for the next Republican prez. After a successful run of 4-8 years in that capacity he could then run for prez to continue the revolution.

brokered convention????
Personally I think a brokered convention with the Republican leadership that we have now would be a disaster. I know everybody fantasizes about a real conservative coming forward to save us from the RINOs that have taken over, but the truth is that the party elites are all RINOs and a brokered convention would simply give them the power to nominate who they wanted.

I like Newt but really...
That opening salvo was just stupid. If given a choice between Rib Eye and Porterhouse, I will usually choose Porterhouse. That DOESN'T mean I don't like Rib Eye. Though it might mean I don't get the choice often enough.

Imaging four nearly identical candidates and one that was quite different. The four all appeal to the same 72% of the voters and end up with between 21% and 15% of the vote. The least like guy gets 28%

Voters were forced to name ONE candidate. You almost certainly get a different picture if the vote had been on who should NOT get the nomination. Playing games with numbers the way he does it here is a foolish waste of time.

And I would support a run by Mr Gingrich

OBQuiet
I think you have hit on the answer. Run national primaries like American Idle. Start the campaign and after 1 month of speech-a-fying have a vote to elliminate 1 candidate. Do that at one month intervals until there are only two candidates left and then hold the election.

Newt lost it
Newt lost it when he tried to out-green Al Gore in a global warming "debate" where both sides were in agreement. Don't call us, we'll call you.

newt
Right on. I've been praying for a Gingrich Presidency for years.

J T Hollywood, CA

Newt & J C Watts (What a ticket).....
...these two would make!

Newt has grown much in the ten or so years he's been out of Congress; and, that growth has been all in the conservative, solutions and leadership directions. His views on global warming are, basically, broken down to be encouragement of ACTUAL technological solutions to any kind of man made contributions (if, in fact, any exist) to the problem in question -- the same types of solutions he has promoted for virtually all (our) problems. Too, he has grown in his own moral stature (and if you think that is not possible then you don't belong in either the conservative movement or the Republican party).

All of that said, anything lacking in his character would be MORE THAN made up by a running mate such as J.C. Watts -- the very DEFINITION of character!

Enough said???

TBC :>)

Huckabeen!!!
PLEASE let this happen!

Yeah!
Sign me up! We need to do something; time is running out.

You have to vote
Look,
Those of you who say you may not vote because there are no good candidates are missing the point. ANY of the remaining Republican candidates will be better for the U.S. than Hillary or Obama. If you are conservative and do not vote, the Democrats win. WAKE UP. You have to vote for the Republcan candidate no matter who it turns out to be because we cannot survive a Hillary presidency.

doctordoctor writes:
Thursday, January, 24, 2008 8:14 PM
WHAT IS THERE NOT TO TRUST
ABOUT MITT?

For starters let's recall that just a few short years ago he was pro-choice. Now that he seeks the GOP nod, he has decided that he is pro-life.

A flip in the right direction or a flop just to get the support of the sheeple?

I am also curious why at 60 years old it took him so long to realize that the unborn have a right to life?

Don, get a life!
"Now that he seeks the GOP nod, he has decided that he is pro-life."

I'm sure you know that that statement is a gross misrepresentation of Romney's position.

It was while he was governor of the most liberal state of the union that he decided that abortions should be harder to get and actively worked on the pro-life side. EVEN BEFORE THEN HE WAS PERSONALLY PRO LIFE!

If his change on that position were only political expediancy why would he have done it when, and in a state, where his new position was unpopular.

Are you opposed to people admitting their mistakes and changing for the better?

CHECK OUT THIS NEW "NEWS MAX" ARTICLE. You will be pleasantly surprised.

http://w3.newsmax.com/romney/?s=al&promo_code=43CE-1

Newt, Newt, Newt
Let’s go Newt!

Newt is the most brilliant politician in the past couple of decades, at least since Reagan. (Why was Reagan so brilliant? Because he talked with me 10 to 15 times while Gov and soon thereafter.)

I know Newt screwed himself out of office, and Clinton screwed himself into an impeachment, but who cares.

Let’s go Newt, the most brilliant politician at this point in time.

Newt balanced the budget not Clinton. Newt took care of welfare, not Clinton.

I am hoping for for a smoke filled room at the convention, and the report from that room will say Newt, Newt, Newt. Remember, Clinton’s second term was almost livable, because Newt ran the Congress.

Bush’s terms have been unlivable because no one ran the Congress.

Let’s just see a couple of phrases from that old document called the Constitution, and remember that the Congress is just as important as the President, if not more so.

======

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law;



Baggage but brilliant
Newt is the most brilliant pol in politics. But, his baggage is just too much from the past and he would be a poster boy for mud and lies that he might just fold anyhow. If he ever did get to the Convention, he might make some noise. But, delegates may already be decided through the primaries. McCain will get creamed by the media even if he gets the nomination. When the media endorses anyone in the Pub primary, who cares? They will try to destroy Newt too. That is why either a guy like Rudy or Mitt, the two grownups and perhaps tougher than even the BASE thinks, will still be around by the Convention.

Oh you single issue cry babies.


In spite of the First Amendment, I would like a law that said no one can mention the word Abortion, unless it is a lady asking for one.

Just think, there is no way any one man from any party can do all the things by himself, needed to be done by a President. He can not be an expert in the thousands of items that need attention.

The President will be in office about 35,000 hours per term, so if he solved one problem each hour, 24 hours a day, he couldn’t address them all.

That’s why the most important job of the President is to appoint his staff. And the staff appointed by a Republican will be more conservative than the Liberals appointed by a Democrat.

So get off of this single-issue nonsense, whatever the issue. We must elect a well rounded person, one who can at least recognize the problems that will need solutions during his term.


Jim, on "single issue cry babies"
You are absolutely right on that point!

As to your other points in your previous post:

"Newt, the most brilliant politician at this point in time.

Newt balanced the budget not Clinton."

You are again correct but Newt also has some personal baggage and unfortunately was so thouroughly demonized prior to his departure from congress that he may not be able to win in a general election even if he get's the chance from the convention.

Also, as ThunderThud correctly pointed out:

"The President's job is an EXECUTIVE job. That's why so many governors do so well and why legislators do not."

IMHO Newt would be more valuable as an advisor or in a cabinet position.

I think that the "far and away" leading cantidate at this moment is Mitt Romney, especially after last nights debate. He is ahead in delagate count and right now he appears to be ahead in Florida and maybe even California!

"News Max" just put out an excellent article about Mitt Romney. If people get to know him, he WILL win! Check it out. It is at:

http://w3.newsmax.com/romney/?s=al&promo_code=43CE-1

jim
"In spite of the First Amendment, I would like a law that said no one can mention the word Abortion, unless it is a lady asking for one."

Thanks for proving once again that liberal "tolerance" isn't so tolerant.

jim, and ANOTHER thing...
"In spite of the First Amendment, I would like a law that said no one can mention the word Abortion, unless it is a lady asking for one."

In the nineteenth century, the House of Representatives passed a gag rule which forbade anyone to bring up the issue of slavery. Fortunately, the abolitionists were too devoted to their cause to be dissuaded by such nonsense.

Your proposal sounds like a throwback to that era. Call us "one issue crybabies" or whatever other name you want, but we will still exercise our rights of free speech in spite of self-appointed would-be censors like you.

Newt- Dark Horse
I think it would be a very big mistake for the party to attempt to parlay Newt into the candidate of choice. He has avoided the entire campaign debate process and would be seen as a last best hope attempt by the Republican Party. Desparate undecided party with not hope for the future. As much as I dislike McCain(RINO) if he is the choice I will make my dislike for the democratic nominee by exercising my right to vote for an alternative to Socialized medicine, high taxes, reduced second amendment rights, gag rules on radio talk or other conservative views. I know we are all anxious about the outcome of the nomination process; but really, I think we fear most the Clinton nomination. Lets not lose our heads of this..enjoy our summer and get ready to go to the polls in November and tell the Democratic Party we want nothing of their social engineering. Lets quit talking about not going our to vote or not voting for the candidate nominated by the Republican Delegates. If you don't like the process...then get out and change the world. Your one vote is the beginning.

What are you smoking Mike?
Let's set aside the political stances and what he's for or against. There is no way the American people are going to accept a candidate that didn't run. The entire electoral process would be destroyed. Democrats would start talking about how the GOP didn't listen to the voters and selected thier candidate in a smoke-filled back room. Even if Jesus Christ came back to Earth and won a brokered convention without running in the primary, he would be rejected.
There is NO WAY someone that wasn't voted on can win the election. That is just red meat for any opponent. A properly nominated mushroom could beat Newt in that type of race.
Try putting something that floats in your next trial baloon.
As one of the Fredheads looking for a new home, I would support Hillary Clinton (GASP!) before I'd vote for someone that tried this tactic.

Still Undecided
I believe, like many here, we lack for TRUE conservative leadership. I was originally for Hunter, but he just didn't have the draw/appeal/name recognition. When he withdrew, I threw my support to Fred (wow, was that short-lived). Unfortunately, I believe he entered too late, and bailed-out too early.

Now, I'm leaning towards Romney, but not with a lot of excitement.

FWIW, Ron Paul is only slightly less crazy than Kucinich (sp?) and he's a certifiable loon; just MHO.

Dallas Tide, Here's a link for you...
I also like Hunter VERY, VERY MUCH. I hope we see more of him in the future.

There is a really impressive article about Mitt Romney on Newsmax. If you havn't already seen it, here is the link:

http://w3.newsmax.com/romney/?s=al&promo_code=43CE-1

I am willing to bet that you will be as impressed as I was. This guy is really something!

No Newt
While I admire Newt for a lot of reasons (I think he is a brilliant mind) and I agree with MOST (but not all) of his positions, he would be a disaster as the Republican nominee. He carries too much baggage, some deserved and some not, to ever beat any Democratic candidate, no matter who it ends up being. The Democrats (with the assistance of the media who HATE him) would make mincemeat of him and we would end up with Hillary/Obama.


We have a conservative
Romney is plenty conservative, although a convert on pro life, so was Regan. If you cannot trust a convert, then throw out all the epistles of Paul. He was a convert too.

My ideal ticket. Mitt/Newt
These guys are both fantastic communicators, both statesmen (which we need as much or more than just conservatives).

Go Mitt/Newt

The $40 Million Question

How many people would be intelligent enough to vote for a true conservative who ran as an independent?

Would there be enough Republicans breakaway and independents as well as Reagan Democrats to garner enough to win if the person had a great plan to solve America's issues?

@skywalker81
Perhaps those who reject the current list of contenders have a greater concern than you have considered: the essence, the identity, of the GOP.

There are those who would consider the 2008 battle *less* important than the war for the very existence of an actual a conservative party in the United States.

The rest of you are on a multiple choice test from the enemy:

a. the liberal who promises to be conservative in the future, and who has been tough on crime

b. the liberal who is slinky and denies he was ever, ever a liberal (in the most pernicious sense of the word)

c. the man who is from the perceived self-sabotage wing of the Republican Party

d. the man who is, in certain bent mirror images, at least a fiscal moderate, yet a believable social conservative

Face it, if you pick once, you will be doing it every time.

Hope for the best, prepare...
If John McCain is the only Republican who can beat the Democrats in 2008, as many are now saying; the Republicans and America are in deep trouble.

Both Dole and McCain are war heroes who are genuine patriots; however, the political arena they both found themselves in is surely not patriotic. It is nothing but a corrupted, self-serving, etc., etc. unpatriotic system that must be changed. Else, America will continue its decline into oblivion.

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst…V-O-T-E…else don’t complain!

I like the idea; however, Newt has some negatives that the “Clinton Machine” would love to grid-up and spit-out. Do not think Newt would like the task of taking on the “Evil Ones”. But then who would??


The Dark Horse Let Me Down
Newt, I would still vote for him, but never for McCain. I might as well vote for a Democrat. Of
course I might write in Jim Demint from S.C. If
Mitt Romney wins iI will support him.

nyet to newt
smart...ok! conservative..okay...well...okayyy!
morally disciplined...NO!
IF YOU CANT KEEP YOUR WEDDING VOWS...get a divorce. dont pull a juan mc mexico,rudy,and newt!geeez iam tired of all this garbge.....
darkhorse, mystery man,resurrected moses abraham
lincoln from the grave,they are all going to come from the spirit world...and meet at the convention...and form a joint presidency! that is my prediction!
elvis

Enough about the baggage
Why do we always fall for the set-up? The fact is Newt exhibits sincere contrition regarding his personal imperfections-would that we all do! Are we not obliged then to forgive and look beyond that. We sound of all knowledge and little wisdom. The idea that we allow the dems to make mincemeat of our candidates is largely due to a glaring failure to defend our own.

The fact is I could throw a collective landfill up as our nominee and the stench of the Clintons would still make us blush!

Bush was "reading to children" (sacre bleu!), yeah, and Bill was "getting serviced" in our White House. Are you kidding me? Please, do bring up baggage. Let's go there, shall we?


Huckabee is NOT out
The MAJORITY of Americans have NOT voted yet. Don't count Huck out. He is the consistent pro-life, pro-traditional family,pro-gun rights, pro-fair tax, candidate. I will NOT vote for liberal activist judge appointing Mitt. His walk talks louder than his talk talks. Visit RoeGone,org. A vote for Mitt is a vote for McCain. John is not conservative. If Mike doesn't win I hope Newt gets in the race.

A Tale of Two Mitts
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video_log/2008/01/mccain_a _tale_of_two_mitts_web.html

Mitt Romney dissing Ronald Reagan. Yeah, he is a "real" conservative...(sarcasm intended)
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.