Join The Debate!

IMPORTANT WORDS FROM AN EX-MUSLIM

Ali Sina is an extremely erudite ex-Muslim. His words can be taken as authoritative. Here's the synopsis and introduction to his book "Understanding Islam and the Muslim Mind":

My book, Understanding Islam and the Muslim Mind is finished. I believe this book is a devastating blow to Islam. Thousands of people, both Muslims and non-Muslims have changed their views about Islam after reading faithfreedom.org. It is time to take this message to a bigger audience.

I have been called an extremist. I accept this charge with honor. Islam is sheer evil. It must be opposed completely. Anything less would be a compromise with evil. How do you nullify a total lie? With half-truths? To say we should adopt a moderate stance vis-à-vis Islam is a logical fallacy. Islam says, kill the unbelievers. How can one be moderate in the face of that? Does moderation mean accepting that Muslims only jail or beat the unbelievers? Islam teaches one man can have four wives. Should we compromise and say two wives are okay? Either Allah is God or else he is the figment of a sick mind. Does moderation mean recognizing him as real but asking Muslims not to pay heed to his hateful and violent Quran?

I vehemently reject any recognition of Islam as a legitimate religion and call for its total denunciation. Seventy years ago, if someone had called for a total denunciation of Nazism, he probably would have been called an extremist as well, yet a decade later everyone adopted that view. Should we not learn from history? Evil must be rejected completely and without reservation.

Introduction

When the US invaded Afghanistan and then subsequently, Iraq , we were told that the problem with these countries was the absence of democracy, and for that reason and reason alone is why these states are and have remained rogue states, harbour terrorism and threaten the peace of the world. Therefore, since the problem was deemed clearcut, the solution must be equally so: Remove the dictators, establish democracy, and the problem will simply resolve itself.

In fact this was the idea propounded by Natan Sharansky, a Soviet dissident turned Israeli cabinet minister. In his book, The Case for Democracy, Sharansky made a distinction between what he calls “free” societies and “fear” societies and criticized those who argue that democracy is culturally contingent and so, is unsuited to Muslim society. He writes that the democracy that hates you is a better friend than the tyrant that loves you.

The American administration, after 9/11, appears to have taken Sharansky’s advice to heart. Acting on this principle the Taliban in Afghanistan were decisively removed, while Saddam Hussein’s tyranny in Iraq was crushed. Immediately following, free elections in both countries were called. Later, in Palestine , a free election was held as well. Despite the facade of fair elections held in these countries, true democracy remains but an illusion.

In Afghanistan , girls cannot go to school, while their teachers face death threats for attempting to teach them. In July 2006, Mark Hume, a Canadian carpenter in Afghanistan was shot dead. His crime? He had helped build a school in a remote part of Hindu Kush . In post Taliban Afghanistan still freedom of conscience is nonexistent. For anyone who elects to leave Islam, it could mean forfeiting their very life. At present, Iraq is in a virtual state of civil war. In Palestine , a terrorist organization, Hamas, won in a landslide, when free elections were called. Yet, despite these outward changes, in none of these countries can it be said that real democracy does exist.

Was Sharansky wrong? In theory, no! There is nothing wrong with the concept of democracy. Democracy is certainly better than dictatorship. One profound truth of all democracies is the fact that no two democracies have ever gone to war against each other – not since the early Greek states. It seems that for war to happen, at least one side must be dictatorial.

So, why has real democracy in these countries not worked? The answer can be summarized in one word: ISLAM.

Islam is the reason no true and long lasting democracy can be established or has taken root in any Islamic country. Islam is also the reason why these countries have remained poor, underdeveloped and backward.

The reality is democracy cannot be imposed from above. To construct a democracy, you must have the right foundation. The foundation of democracy is, at its heart, freedom. Freedom must come first.

In Islamic countries, people do not have an understanding of freedom. They confuse freedom with anarchy. True freedom, as constitutionally-guaranteed freedom, they actually fear. Freedom, as is defined in the context of democracy, means freedom of thought, freedom of expression and freedom of action, as long as your freedom does not limit the freedom of others. This understanding of freedom as frightening to them as it is alien, since such freedom is not rooted in Islam, and therefore, is not a part of Islamic society.

It’s not their own, personal freedom that is frightening to them. Those Muslims living in non-Muslim nations have and do know to take full advantage of their freedom in their host, democratic countries, as they promote their faith. In fact they often demand even greater freedom, in insisting upon freedoms that are not accorded even to those natives, non Muslim citizens. What it is they most fear and what it is they really are actively fighting against is the fact that within democracies, those whom they perceive to be their natural opponents, the infidels, or non-Muslims, are likewise free, and as such, are granted equal opportunity. For Muslims, who seek to establish their political dominance over all others through coercion, having instead to compete on a level playing field with people of other beliefs, sets up a challenging and often frightening prospect. Allowing equal advantage to those who otherwise exist in natural opposition to Islam and according them the ability to promote their ideas, or worse, permitting them influence those Muslims who might then be "lured away" to new ways of thinking and seeing outside of Islam, is an intolerable situation to Muslim sensitivity. Such a freedom is regarded by Muslims as a direct threat to their ability to promote the Muslim position.

Muslims cannot tolerate views that by their very nature are either resistant or in opposition to their own. This became clear to the non-Muslim world with the case of the recent cartoon conflagration. Millions of Muslims worldwide, almost overnight, rioted, in Islamic as well as Western countries. They burned embassies, desecrated and destroyed churches, killed innocent people, all because a Danish newspaper had published a few cartoons depicting Muhammad, their prophet.

Before any serious attempt to bring democracy to the Islamic countries can begin, we must first lay the foundation of democracy. For this to even happen, for Islamic societies to be able to make this transition, they would have to become tolerant, learn to respect people with differing views, while their governments would have to ensure that all freedoms are safeguarded for all citizens, regardless of their faith or gender.

Democracy is a mighty edifice. It cannot be built on moving sand. It requires a sound foundation. Democracy, true democracy, does not mean dictatorship by the majority. Democracies are constructed for the protection of the rights of the minority. This very concept, so fundamental to democracy, is alien to Islam, which both regards as well as insists on treating members of the minority, non-Muslim citizens, strictly as second-class citizens. Under Islamic law, non-Muslim citizens must agree to pay a penalty tax, and as the Quran emphasizes, they must feel themselves subdued and made subservient to the ruling Muslim majority.

What does it take to build this solid foundation? How can we as non-Muslims convince Muslims to be tolerant of views contrary to their own religious beliefs and learn to respect the rights of people, rights that would include the right to dissent, even the right to leave Islam, to believe in other faiths, or not to believe at all?

Islam does not permit Muslims to leave Islam. Likewise, it does not allow people of other faiths to exercise their religions freely, let alone be allowed to preach their faith freely. Islam does not recognize equal human rights for those who are not Muslims, nor does it recognize the equality of women regardless of their faith. Islam does not allow freedom of thought, nor freedom of speech. It is for these reasons that democracies in Islamic countries don't work. As long as these countries remain Islamic in nature, there cannot be any true democracy. Furthermore, as long as they remain undemocratic, and in allegiance to Islam, they will remain a danger to themselves as well as to the World.

The number of Muslims living in the West is increasing, not only from immigration, but because Muslim families are reproducing at a much higher rate – at nearly three times faster than westerners. While an Italian woman, on average, gives birth to 1.2 children, a Muslim woman is more likely to have four or five children. The same disparity in population growth rated exists throughout Europe . You need a ratio of 2.1 children per woman just to maintain the existing level of the population at replacement rate. At the current rate, in just a matter of a few decades, Muslims will become a major political and cultural force, and could reach the `majority in many European countries.

The bottom line is Muslims will never assimilate, just as they cannot accept, nor can they live by the tenets of what is and must constitute a true, living democracy. For they to do so would mean they would essentially have to relinquish their faith, to compromise for something that cannot be abided, nor allowed under Islam, which is full acceptance of the equality between Muslim and non-Muslim. Given that, the historical and demographic pattern that has persisted for centuries dictates the following. Once the Muslim population becomes a majority or even a near-majority within any nation, they no longer will have to accept, nor seek compromise, in upholding human rights of non-Muslims or in maintaining equality with the non-Muslim population. At that point, once they have achieved political dominance and secured power, they would be expected to move quickly to terminate all freedoms. Non-Muslim citizens, living in their own native countries would be relegated to second-class citizens, or worse, become persecuted in the way Hindus are presently persecuted in those countries that were once their traditional homelands, such as Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh, just as Zoroastrians, Jews, Christians and Baha’is are persecuted and brutally mistreated in Iran today.



The Western world is currently caught between a rock and a hard place. Whatever viable options that may still remain open are rapidly dwindling, as time is no longer on our side. With every minute that passes, as each new baby is born to a Muslim family in the West, the threat of Islam grows, while the hope for democracy and freedom to live on becomes a fading prospect. With the birth of each new Muslim child in the west, the pace of that threat is increasing, exponentially. This threat should be taken more seriously than the threat of terrorism.

It is not just the non-Muslims who are trapped, Muslims also have no options. They are prisoners too. They can’t have peace or tolerate others simply because this would be against their faith. They have to fight us, force us to convert, subdue and humiliate us, or kill us if they want to be believers. We are all hostages of Islam. All these wars, all these pains and sufferings, these senseless killings, are the result of the belief in Islam. Mankind has been taken as hostage by the ghost of one man – a psychopath, a narcissist, a sick needy man of the seventh century Arabia who burned the world to satiate his intense low self esteem. Low self esteem is the root cause of all evils.

The British ethologist and science writer Richard Dawkins wrote: “The likelihood is that, in 100,000 years time, we shall either have reverted to wild barbarism, or else civilisation will have advanced beyond all recognition – into colonies in outer space, for instance.”

Where we are heading as a civilization will be forever determined by what happens in this century. If mankind is destined to revert to wild barbarism, it won’t take us 100,000 years to come to that. If humanity falls to Islam, and all freedoms are lost, mankind will be forced to revert to barbarism, a condition that would occur within a mere100 years. Under present trends, at some point during this century, the entire world could become Islamic, beginning first with Europe . From there, in a matter of a few centuries, after the world has succumbed, civilization would not only fall, but would face its ultimate demise, in total cultural annihilation. This is the same fate that has befallen all previous civilizations that have been subdued, then forced into cultural extinction, under Islam. This is an obliteration so complete that almost nothing is left to memory. What we know today as civilization and culture will be called taghoot (ungodly) and jaheliyah (ignorance) and will be destroyed. Little trace of what it is today will be left, just as little of the ancient civilizations of Persia and Egypt are left. If Islam is allowed to take power, the remaining embers of mankind's light that have marked civilization’s progress would be extinguished, perhaps forever.

Presenting such a terrible, dark picture should not be dismissed as hyperbole, or as some wild, farfetched scenario that could never possibly come to pass. If appropriate action is not taken soon to stop, and turn around this inexorable tide of events, such a dark scenario is all but certain to unfold. Presently, humanity, under the nations’ governments, and through the influence and power of its cultural and political leaders, is, however blindly, being led down a course that can only lead to its defeat. So locked in this direction are we that, within a few short decades, the course of history could be pushed past the point of no return. If you are not already scared, then now may be a good place to start.

In this book I have tried to shed light on one of the most complex and explosive dilemmas humanity has ever faced, and to do so in a way that would allow free societies to both contain and eventually harness the threat.

In order to protect ourselves, we must first know our enemy. It is only by knowing our enemy, by knowing what they think and believe, by understanding what motivates them, and by knowing what their goals are, both near-term and long-term, can we then construct a roadmap from which to counteract their movements. What is ultimately at stake here is our survival. Compared to the scale of threat that Islam poses, Nazism and communism were a mere picnic, a brief historical period, a mere interlude, while Islam, by virtue of its alleged divine authority has the potential to change the course of history for ever.

So what is it that makes Islam and Muslims so different? Why do Muslims hate and distrust us? Why do they regard us as their enemy? Are these just grievances? What do they want? Is Islamic terrorism just an aberration? Is there a peaceful Islam that needs to be resurrected? Is there even such thing as a moderate Islam? Can moderate Islam overcome an extremist Islam? Has the West been in any way responsible for how Muslims feel or have reacted? Is poverty, lack of education, lack of opportunities and widespread dictatorship within the Muslim world the cause of Islamic revolts worldwide or are these symptoms of a yet bigger, more fundamental problem that has hitherto not been addressed? Will this nightmare end any time soon? Is this actually the beginning of World War III? If so, how can we fight it, and what will be the consequences if we are to lose? These are some of the questions that are examined in this book.

As great and as widespread as Islamic terrorism is, it still does not represent our gravest threat. Our ultimate challenge is the Islamic demographic explosion, which threatens to overrun the already dwindling populations in many civilized countries, particularly in the west. Even if we were to overcome the war on terror and achieve some kind of military victory, by somehow subduing terrorism, we would still most certainly lose the "population war".

The problem is not "Islamic extremism", which is a misnomer. The problem is Islam, itself. Many modern writers have condemned Islamic extremism, but have carefully avoided invoking the perception of being seen as being even slightly critical of Islam, the religion. So they claim that the terrorists have hijacked Islam and misinterpreted its "peaceful message". This book serves to refute this contention, as it endeavors to show what is the root cause of Islamic violence, as it is stated and defined in the Quran, the Hadith (traditions) and the Sunna (the examples set by Muhammad – the Islamic scriptures.

Islam, at its essential core, is unflinchingly violent, extremist, reactionary, intolerant, anti-western and misogynistic, whether it be Sunni and Shi’a.

In this book, I try to explain that when there is conflict or a confrontation between extremist Islam and moderate Islam, extremism always wins out. There can be no moderation in Islam. Moderate Islam is not true Islam. That is how, as it so often occurs, moderate Muslims can so easily and with so little aforethought can become extremists. Countries that have had long-held traditions of tolerance and moderation have become extremist overnight. It is hard to imagine that Arabs, prior to Islam, were among the most tolerant people of the world. Religious hostilities were once nonexistent.

Today, as we witness such widescale religious intolerance in Pakistan , it is difficult to believe that only a few centuries ago the Pakistanis were tolerant Hindus. It is also hard to imagine that the Iranians who today threaten the peace of the world and have taken human rights abuses to its lowest rung and whose president insists that Israel must be wiped off the map are the very same descendants whose ancestors were the authors of the first charter of human rights recorded in history. Wherever Islam goes, tolerance is extinguished and terror sets in.

It is a mistake to count Islam as a religion, to in any way grant it the same status that is accorded Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism or Buddhism. Wolfgang Bruno, who is currently writing a book on the ex-Muslim movement, has written: "Westerners view Islam as a religion currently beset by many problems and aggressive groups, but still one that can offer comfort and moral guidance to millions of people. That is a fundamental mistake. Islam is not an addition to the American or European diversity rainbow. In fact, it wants to scrap the diversity rainbow and replace it with an Islamic cave." I agree with Bruno. I trust by the time you finish reading this book, you’ll come to see why.

There are few choices in front of us. We must either, defeat Islam, surrender to them and submit to their dominance, or prepare ourselves to wage war against them and kill them before they kill us. Muslims also have few choices. They must fight against us, kill us, or subdue us. Asking Muslims to live in peace with others is asking them to betray their faith. Muslims are obliged to wage the Jihad. This is their religious duty. As long as Muslims believe in Islam they will have to fight and promote it with violence any time they feel they have the upper hand and can win. The Earth belongs to Allah, they believe, and it is their obligation to reclaim it and establish his rule.

There are many Muslims who are peaceful, but Islam is not peaceful. It is unrealistic to expect all Muslims not to follow their religion fully- to believe in it and yet not to practice it. We must either, accept and live with Islamic terrorism until eventually we succumb, or denounce Islam altogether. We must either recognize that Islam is the disease and all these wars, terrorisms and miseries affecting the Muslim world are the symptoms of it or brace ourselves for the gradual or sudden destruction of mankind. My hope in writing this book is that sanity prevails and we do the right thing.

With Islam there can be no democracy, no equality for women, and no peace. That is why America is failing in Afghanistan and in Iraq . That is why there can never be peace in the Middle East . To build democracy we need a foundation. Islam cannot hold such a foundation. The very concept of democracy, freedom and equality is antithesis to Islam.

SYNOPSIS

In writing Understanding Islam I have tried to take an unabashed, unwaveringly honest look at Islam – free from the many prejudices that have held back honest scholarship, and without the constraints of political correctness, which have only served to distort and retard serious discussion. This book starts by analyzing the life of Muhammad, the founder of Islam. To understand Islam is to know its founder and creator. Islam is the brainchild of Muhammad.

The facts about Islam and its author are either not well-known or not easily attainable to the average reader. At the forefront of writing such a book, stating the truth about Muhammad and his religion is neither a safe enterprise, nor politically correct. Thousands of books have been written by the apologists of Islam over many years and yet none have managed to take on the truth and address the questions that need addressing, and can no longer be avoided. Only those historical texts that were written in the first three centuries of Islam can you find the truth about Muhammad. It is from those sources do we learn that Muhammad was not the benign, religious leader many of us have been lead to believe. He is described as a marauding chieftain who rose to power through raids and robbing innocent people. He acted and conducted himself as a violent criminal, one who would not hesitate to commit assassination, rape, torture and even genocide in order to reach his goal of total power, with complete dominion over all others.

The history of Islam, subsequent to Muhammad, is also fraught with violence and bloodshed. The source for all this violence is the Quran and in the examples set down by Muhammad. The deeds of Muhammad were recorded in traditions (hadith) and Muslims and Muslims follow his footsteps and this is why Muslims are so violent and so ruthless. The first chapter of this book focuses on Muhammad. Who he was. How he came to power. What fired his will?

Islam, as a religion, raises several questions, not the least of which is, should Islam even be considered a religion? Does it fit the definition of what is a religion or is it simply an overgrown cult? Did Muhammad receive revelations from God or was he a mentally disturbed man that, like Hitler and other great megalomaniacs of history, suffered from a condition known as narcissistic personality disorder? What is it that drove him to behave so? Was he the model for good, ethical decorum or was he only interested in dominating others and building his empire while using religion as a pretext from which to treat others as a means to his ends?

Islam is essentially a political movement. Its goal is to dominate the world? What kind of government Islam proposes? Would this government be fair and just? Islam does not recognize equality. Men and women are not equal; Muslims and non-Muslims are not equal; slaves and free people are not equal. How can such a doctrine of inequality be compatible with democracy? Islam is indeed a fascistic doctrine that glorifies the state, disdains reason, scorns art, promotes vigilantism, is misogynist, and practices censorship of thoughts. Islam is the only major “religion” that does not adhere to the concept of fairness and teaches its followers to do to non-believers what they themselves find objectionable if done to them. Islam is the only major religion that encourages its follower to lie and deceive others, and regards such acts as "holy deception". Islam is the only major religion that openly preaches hate and incites its followers to fight against the non-believers, to slay them, to crucify them, to chop their fingertips and to be harsh with them, as it is explicitly enjoined in the Quran.

Hitler said, “The broad mass of people... falls victim to a BIG LIE more easily than to a small one." [1] Muhammad based his entire religion on this approach, yet because of his mental disorder, he was also the first to believe his own big lies and therefore, became so convincingly the part from which he had cast himself in, that he was able to leave others, those who saw and heard him, spellbound, transforming them into fervent believers in his cause. This is the psychopathology common among many charismatic, cult leaders.

Muhammad based his entire religion on this philosophy. But because of his mental disorder, he was the first to believe in his own big lie and acted so compellingly that he left others spellbound and convinced. This is an ability shared by all psychopaths and cult leaders.

After analyzing the cultic nature of Islam, this book takes the position that the possibility for Islam to be reformed is virtually nil. It explains how every attempt to reform Islam throughout its history has met with failure, that the ills affecting the Islamic world are rooted in Islam itself. Islam will not benefit by pruning. It needs to chopped and burned. Muslims are dangerous to the degree that they practice Islam and follow the examples of Muhammad. Even when the Westerners convert to Islam, they become equally and as quickly dangerous. American converts plot terrorism against America; Jewish converts start hating Israel and celebrate each time there is a suicide bombing in that country; British converts despise Britain and call it "the third most hated country of the world" (after Israel and America). They become terrorists and not only cheerfully kill their own countrymen, but would not hesitate to kill their own non-Muslim parents.

By following Muhammad, by choosing to emulate him, Muslims as a whole, have chosen to live, however unconsciously, in his narcissistic bubble universe. Thus, they feel entitled to privileges without commensurate achievements. They become supremacists by virtue of their beliefs and demand submission and servitude from their non-Muslim hosts, even when they are still only the minority. In the West, they often live a parasitic life, feeding off the welfare, adding to the index of crime, and repopulating rapidly, with the stated goal of taking over their host countries in the name of Allah.

Muslims are trapped in a web of lies and shackled by fear. The fear of hell has paralysed their minds. As a result, they are rendered incapable of rationally examining their faith in a way that would allow them to question it. So they reflexively dismiss any doubt about Islam, once the fear of hell and the "punishment in grave" arises. Islam is not only a doctrine of fear, for those who would oppose it, but a doctrine held together by fear, for those Muslims who would dare to question it. The same fear that has inspired its strength in conquest over those who are marked its enemies also settles into the minds of believing Muslims, instilling a terror that can displace what little will or resolve they may have left to challenge its precepts. That is the fixed formula for Islam’s success, of how it has managed to both survive and thrive for so long.

By virtue of having this shared mindset, and based on the intransigent and inalterable teachings of the Quran, Islam cannot be reformed. Any reformation of Islam is considered, "innovation", which is deemed to be a sin graver than heresy. All the doors of reformation in Islam were closed by Muhammad himself. No one can change a single verse of the Quran. Therefore this book must remain what it is and as history so abundantly shows, a manual for terror and a prescription for misery for all humanity.

Within this tight, psychological grip, Islam, functioning as cult, destroys the identity and the selfhood of its believers and imposes itself as their new identity. That is why Muslims cling to Islam and will defend it with their lives. For a Muslim, Islam is everything. Without it, he is simply nothing. Muslims cannot get rid of Islam until their selfhood is restored. If one has been a Muslim, one must seek fundamental changes in one’s psyche until one’s lost identity re-emerges and the chains of Islam are broken. But this won’t happen unless Islam is discredited completely so that each Muslim starts looking for his or her lost identity and begins to recover his selfhood and his humanity.

This book also exposes the unholy alliances between Islam and the extreme Left on the one hand and the extreme Right on the other, and reveals how all these strange bedfellows have together formed an axis that spins them ever more quickly around their common hatred of democracy, America and Israel.

The entire hand is not played out, however. We can not dismiss nor overlook the danger of the occurring a major backlash. The inability of politicians to deal with the threat of Islamofascism is also helping pave the way for what could arise, in there being a renewed Eurofascism. If governments fail to protect their own citizens, the citizens in turn are likely to rise up and take matters into their own hands. This could advance, as it escalates, into a bloody civil war across all of Europe, as well as Australia . Unless Islam is discredited and Muslims are weaned from jihad, civil war is all but a foregone conclusion. Within this growing reality, the November 2005 riots in France are but a prelude of things to come.

Finally, this book discusses how to deal with Muslim hooliganism, how to confront their bullying, the alternate riots and tiresome outrage of every perceivable affront, as it discusses how to realistically repel their aggression with strength, without stooping to a likeminded violence or surrending to this obvious use of coercion.

This book does not attempt to provide all the answers to the problem of Islamic terrorism. What it instead endeavors to do, is to remove the mist surrounding Islam, and to open a window into the Muslim mind. Islamic terrorism affects everyone. Although it appears to be senseless, it actually is not. It is methodical and doctrinal. It’s my hope that this book will help the reader to make sense out of the senseless.