Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Michael McBride :: Townhall.com Columnist
Turning Surge Into Victory
by Michael McBride
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


When I cracked 1776 on Wednesday to give it its long overdue read, there were two pleasant surprises. I found that it was autographed by the author…something I am appalled at myself for not remembering. And secondly, alone on the inner leaf just prior to Part One, I was greeted by a simple and profound quote from General George Washington…

“Perseverance and spirit have done wonders in all ages.”

I should grace the elegance of his words by stopping now, but I fear that my editor is expecting more, and that my semi-conceited verbosity cannot be held in check.

Why Surge?

Developing synergy, while not one of the nine generally accepted “Principles of War,” is an essential element in warfighting. Synergy is developed by having sufficient resources available to conduct all aspects of warfighting required to complete the specific mission to an overwhelming effect.

Too few troops… and units will not be able to conduct all the necessary ops required to fight and win a counterinsurgency struggle. They will not be able to simultaneously hunt down armed and indiscriminant murderers, protect logistical lines of support, conduct aggressive patrolling operations, conduct community confidence building and infra-structure re-building efforts, and deliver the expected results to an impatient Congress in a timely manner.

Too many troops… and a discontinuity of effort between units can develop, the logistical tail can outgrow the size of the dog, and the cost to deliver the expected results to an impatient Congress can exceed their expectations and diminish their support.

Getting the proper sized force in place is critical to ensuring that a lean, aggressive force can break the enemies force and their will, ensure its own security, build confidence amongst the local populace, and do so in a timely and efficient manner.

Three years of combat operations in Iraq has greatly diminished the capabilities of the insurgents in Iraq. Yes, they have become more lethal with their explosives…this is simply an outgrowth of the ability to get their hands on better technology, but they are not becoming a better organized, or more effective combat force. Indeed, I think it is very safe to say that if we pulled out today, the insurgents would not be the winner, as they are nearly spent and exhausted, but some third party would likely step into the vacuum that their diminished ranks could not fill.

The goal of the Surge is to complete the task of breaking the will of the insurgents, at the same time, having enough forces available to discourage the rise of a non-governmental third party from interrupting the growth of this fledgling democracy. A simple principle, and well within the norms of our current warfighting capabilities. Situations in combat change and often commanders must be prepared to adapt their strategies and underlying tactics mid-course…this, however is no cause for alarmist, defeatist behavior.

What should the Surge look like?

The Surge should be aggressive in its combat action. It needs to be forceful, lethal, and determined. It needs to re-establish our military supremacy over the situation in Iraq, and in doing so it will re-establish a determined Iraqi populous support for our efforts and their democracy.

Forget hearts and minds, winning insurgencies is about winning the confidence of the general population. If you fail to build a confidence in your inevitable victory and the chances for a long lasting piece, they will waffle in support, biding their time until a clear winner emerges.

Insurgent forces are usually unimaginably brutal in their tactics, not so much to garner support, but more in their efforts to establish security around their ruthless operations. Populations paralyzed in fear, typically do not act against insurgent forces that have a hope in prevailing. Our Surge must extinguish any ray of hope that a post-US Iraq will degenerate into a vengeful free-for-all amongst all the competing political and military entities. To do so, we must crush the ability of our enemies to threaten the general population.

Secondly, we must completely isolate Iraq from any outside political, military, or any other de-stabilizing influences. This includes the harsh interdiction of Iranian, Syrian, Al Qaeda-ian, or any other foreign entity that desires to affect the outcome in Iraq.

This means securing cross-border routes from Iran and Syria, with extreme military measures if required. Lethal combined air-ground operations are likely required to eliminate these as routes of re-supply and re-enforcement. Constant patrolling and interdiction is the order of the day, and this requires a significant number of resources to execute across long international boundaries. This will greatly reduce the combat power of the insurgents and force them to rely solely on “popular” support, which is likely minimal.

This action will additionally have a negative impact on the morale of the insurgents. In order to defeat them, they need to be, and feel, isolated. Isolating the battlefield, aside from providing additional security for our forces, will have an immeasurable effect on the ability of the insurgents to effectively recruit for, and conduct operations within Iraq. The more isolated they are, and they feel, the less effective their operations will be. They need to be impressed with an overwhelming sense of isolation and hopelessness. For, as anyone who has gone through SERE (Survival Escape Resistance and Evasion) training knows, the sense of isolation is a powerful corrosive on the human will. We need to firmly impress the sense of isolation on the insurgents.

We need to win the information war. We need to quit dancing around this one.

The military and the Administration need to redefine this part of the war, and they need to do everything in their power to communicate to the Iraqi people and to all Americans, that we are, even to this point, winning this war. We need to redefine the measureables, swarm the conservative talk shows, and embed as many conservative bloggers over the next few months as possible. Instead of dead US servicemen dominating the MSM, the American public needs to hear about kilowatt hours distributed across the Iraqi power grid. They need to hear how many small businesses opened up last month. They need to hear of dead insurgents, traffic volume, GDP, oil sales, school openings, local elections and everything else that peaceful societies take for granted and fail to appreciate. The public needs to be inundated with every bit of positive news that can make its way out of Iraq. To fail to do so, simply isolates our troops in their efforts and forces them to carry the enormity of their task solo, while the pack wolves known as the MSM circle like vultures waiting for failure. We have to gain traction on this aspect of the war, it is critical to keep the definition of the fight out of the hands of the defeatists….both MSM and Congressional.

How long will the surge last?

Until victory or until the perseverance and spirit of the American will erodes. Victory in Iraq is achievable by our amazingly capable and determined Armed Forces. Their effort will only be undercut by self-serving politicking and pointless impatience.

If we decide we want victory we will have it. If we quit on our effort, we will have defeat.

How did Indianapolis get into the Super Bowl?

Spirit and perseverance.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael E. McBride retired as a Major from the Marine Corps and blogs at http://www.mysandmen.blogspot.com.

Be the first to read Michael McBride's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Surge to Victory
Dear Michael, Excellant article, especially the comments on propaganda issue.
Would it not be positive for Tony Snow to begin each day's press briefing with an update on the "positives" in Irag and Afganistan.
schools, hospitals, public works, victories on the war front by US and Iragi forces, for example.
What a great forum and a great newsman to cover, without interruption, the positives of each day and there are many.
Sincerely, Dennis Reardon
email djr4usarmy@yahoo.com

Why do so many here assume
that democracy is even feasible in Iraq?? Why are we throwing away our young men and women to prop up a sectarian, incompetant and sychophantic farce of an Iraqi government? If people tend to get the government they deserve, then Iraq has certainly gotten its' just deserts with al-Maliki. I shouldn't be OUR blood paying for his corruption, nor his Shiite cabinet death squads. As I have said before...it would have far better to install a relatively benign Musharrif-type strongman, kept the Iraqi Army intact and go home. President Bush had to live out a neo-con fantasy that we are destined to remake the Arab world in our image. It isn't happening.

You hit the nail on the head
In order to prevail, we have to win a counterinsurgency struggle and break the will of the enemy. Unfortunately, that is a lot easier said than done.

Iraq is their home. They live there. The British couldn't break our will in the 1700s. The Germans couldn't break the will of the French during WW2. We couldn't break the will of the Vietnamese in the 1960s and 70s. The English couldn't break the will of the Irish. The Israeli's couldn't break the will of the Palastinians. The Soviets couldn't break the will of the Afghans during the 90s.

If China came in here and occupied the US, would they break our will to fight back no matter how many millions of soldiers they sent? Of course not.

Please give me an example in modern history where an occupying country has been able to "Break the will" of the people who were being occupied. Many of the "insurgents" in Iraq are not Islamo-Fascists who want to attack America. They are people who have lost loved ones to American bombs and want revenge. Arabs have long memories and talk of Alexander the Great's invasion as if it happened 25 years ago.

Maybe our 21,000 soldiers will be able to defy history and accomplish what no one else has. But I wouldn't count on it.
The truly amazing thing is that Bush and the Neo-cons never expected an insurgency and failed to plan for it. It's not our troops that will be at fault if we lose this war. The fault will lie with our leader's failure to understand history and human nature.

Celtic Dragon
Why are you so insistent that the Iraqis are incapable of self government? Sounds a little ethnocentric to me. Japan worshiped the Emporer prior to VJ day. Now they sell us cars and electronics. Germany was bent on killing Jews until VE day. Now they are selling us cars and telling us how to live our lives.

MoQtada El Sadr just vowed to disarm the Mahdi Army and to cede control to the Maliki government.

Perhaps when the region is stabilized and the Iraqi economy has recovered and is growing you will realize that the sky is NOT falling. Wring your hands if you must, but do not demand that freedom be sold out for a particular political party's sake.

InIt2WinIt

Hamilcar Barca

Hamilcar Barca
Insisting that OUR way of government is best for THEM is the result of ethnocentricity, my friend. Indeed, it is impossible to say if democracy is the final word in human governance or not, but one need only look at the wreckage of "elections" held throughout the 3rd world to see that it cannot be unconditionally imposed. While you examples of Japan and Germany are bright spots, keep in mind that both countries were culturally and ethnically homogenous, had civil institutions that were generally free of corruption and highly educated populations. The apples and oranges comparison comes to mind when I look at Iraq.

Stop trying to be their friends
and start being their bosses.

I spent a lot of time with people who were brought up in families that had servants, and one thing I have observed (and that I also learned in charm school -- don't ask) is that socialists and 'democratic' people have a hard time understanding that they don't have to be everybody's best friend. These are the people who want their daughter's friends to think they're "Hotties"; they're the people who want to know their maid's family history and excuse her for not showing up except when she doesn't have anything better to do because she has "issues"; they're the people who don't want to 'upset' their toddlers by insisting that they toe the line; and they're the people who want the whole world to be their friends.

Some of this is an outgrowth of the Civil Rights Act and it used to make me cringe to see the way White patrons allowed Black waitresses and clerks to sass them and disrespect them because they were afraid any attempt to make them do their job was "Racism". Now we are afraid to speak up even to identify the enemy, lest his feelings be hurt and we be called "Islamophobic".

I would remind you of the saying "Grab them by the b***s, their hearts and minds will follow." That's what we need to do. We can't be their friends if they don't respect us. Get in there, kick toosh and take names. Once they respect us, they'll collapse like a cheap suit. They always do. And stay there long enough to whack them again whenever they raise their heads.

celtic-dragon's contradiction

First, celtic-dragons asserts:

"As I have said before...it would have far better to install a relatively benign Musharrif-type strongman, kept the Iraqi Army intact and go home."

But then he complains:

"Insisting that OUR way of government is best for THEM is the result of ethnocentricity, my friend."

So which is it? Do we have the right to impose on them what we think is the best solution, be it "our way" or some tyrant-lite we think is appropriate -- or is doing so "ethnocentric"? You really cannot have it both ways.

Your second statement expresses one of the left's most cherished ideas: multiculturalism, which is the idea that all cultures and systems of government are equally moral and valid, which is the basis for the standard leftist claim that we do not have the right to impose any particular form of government but must instead let them choose how they will be governed and by whom.

Because President Bush foolishly accepts this disastrous leftist doctrine, he has permitted the Iraqis to engage in "self-determination" -- and when that "self-determination" that you leftists hold so dear to heart results in the election of a Maliki, the tolerance of the Shia death squads, the release of terrorists we capture, the vetoing of our military operations against the militia, and all the other horrors being tolerated by the Iraqi government, President Bush finds himself trapped by his acceptance of YOUR idea.

What is particularly galling is that those of you on the left do not have the sense or the grace to acknowledge that the situation in Iraq at present is a consequence of trying to implement YOUR IDEAS. And rather than have the grace to admit that your ideas are disastrously wrong, you are all frantically demonizing the whole Iraq undertaking in the hope that no one will point out just how it refutes your cherished notions:

What is happening in Iraq is exactly what happens when you permit "self determination".

What is happening in Iraq is bad precisely because we DID NOT impose our ideas of individual rights, rule of law, separation of church and state and constitutionally limited government.

What is happening in Iraq is proof that all cultures and systems of government are NOT morally equal and valid -- and your constant condemnation of the situation in Iraq is proof that you know it.

If you want to bash Bush because he has accepted your ideas, fine, bash him, he deserves it, but please bash the ideas at the same time. Admit that multiculturalism is wrong and that the American system of government and the culture that it created are GOOD and are desperately needed everywhere, including Iraq.

The war can still be won -- but not unless we dismiss the left’s ideas and return to fighting the way we did in WWII.

Re:Mike agreed
I agree with your points,Mike. That area Iran/Iraq was once the learning center of the known world. People flocked their for education before Islamic fundamentalism took control.This could be part of the key that will lead that region to democracy. To instill national pride in their accomplishments in the past.
Yesterday I read an article that Shell oil is planning to set up the technology for Iran to exploit their natural gas reserves. While I read that I kept thinking why is Iran dependent on outside sources for technology? Because of Islam. They have no intellectuals capable of doing this. Islam destroys intellectuals and without intellectuals you have no scientists or creative thinking.Iran doesnt have the skill to even keep what oil wells they have running efficiently,they are losing 6 barrels of oil to every 100 that they pump at the oil heads.
Part of the problem in Iraq is our leaders both democrats and republicans dont have a clue about the cultures of that region. Without first learning how these people think and live we will continue to run into a wall. MacArthur was well aware of the Japanese culture and used it to his advantage in turning Japan into a democracy.We need to do the same in Iraq.

Mike makes a good point
and doesn't even realize it.

>Admit that multiculturalism is wrong and that the American system of government and the culture that it created are GOOD and are desperately needed everywhere, including Iraq.<

The Kurds established a democracy long before the invasion of 2003, and are trying to continue to build a cohesive society in spite of opposition from the Bush administration. As for multiculturalism, they have invited Iraqi Christians to seek refuge in Kurdistan, since they are safe in no other region of Iraq.

But there really is no Iraq any more and never will be again most likely. Fallujans do not want to live in a country with Basrans and vice versa. Mike mentions self-determination as the reason for the electiom of the Maliki government. Now that's a joke. Not one Sunni or Kurd voted for the United Islam list. Maliki was elected because Bremer set up a flawed electoral process that ignored regional and provincial dynamics. Bush never pushed self-determination, he pushed, and still pushes an unity that does not now, never has, and never will exist.

Tsk tsk Kimmy
You need to know that anyone can tell that your concern for our troops is as transparently manufactured as would be my concern for your well-being.

Our troops enjoy greater overmatch in weaponry and body/crew protection relative to the threat they face (and considering the available, mass-produced technologies) than any other large combat force has ever known. The limitations of technology with regard to protection from explosive hazards are daunting. This is especially so when the options considered have to mounted on a human body that is only so big and must move around quickly and with large range of motion in hundred-plus degree heat.
We also have some pretty good weapons that our troops could use at any time to tilt forver in our favor the scales of close combat. The cost in collateral damage (and the soldiers are far more aware than are you that this means killed and injured innocent civilians) and even fratricide argue rather strongly against that.

What the troops don't have, and what we really ought to give them, is absolute certainty that their nation is committed to winning the war. They deserve to have people at home quit using specious arguments about "lies", "neocons", "Vietnam" and "quagmire". [Remember when leftist "journalists" were using that term in reference to Afghanistan?]
What the troops deserve and should expect from us is a public debate fueled only by the desire to achieve victory against the blood enemies of our people, our culture, and our nation. Only those who wish to voice alternative options and methods for achieving victory over our enemies should enter the debate at all. [This would have the side benefit of clearing most of the rancor out of the public airways as it would disqualify most every beltway democRAT.]
What our troops need and what would save more of their (and our) lives than any other means of protection is for us to recognize that we are at war with some really nasty people, and that our victory would be the best outcome for all peoples of goodwill.

Hose
The Germans couldn't break the French will in WWII? Um, the Frogs surrendered. Their will was broken. They collaborated quite extensively with the Germans also (see Vichy) - to the extent that they even manned Waffen-SS division.

Sure, all the French NOW claim that they were in the Maquis, but those claims don't square with reality. The "resistance" never was much of anything until immediately before D-Day and after up until Oradur.

BikerKnight
The problem with people like Kimberley is that they can't believe the really nasty people are really nasty--or are anywhere as nasty as the folks like Kimberley know themselves to be. Not that the folks like Kimberley would ever admit even to themselves that they believe themselves to be utterly evil. Rather, they project that belief out on the rest of us. Since we are all seen as evil by these folks, we deserve only to lose and die.

Check out non-normie.com for more on why folks like Kimberley believe the way they do (as well as why the Islamo-nazis believe likewise).

We who are normies and recovering non-normies would rather deal with life as it is, in hopes of making it better for our families, friends, neighbors, and everyone else. Non-normies all suffer from a serious case of arrested development. You can't talk to a non-normie using logic--and you can't believe a word a non-normie says because they all reason from conclusion backward to premise. All you can do is identify them by their illogic, tell them they're not normal, laugh at them, and be prepared to defend yourself when they go ballistic.

Although the number of non-normies in this country is relatively small, they've magnified their influence over the rest of us out of all proportion to their numbers because they're driven to control everyone around them.

Besides identifying them and laughing at them on an individual level, we normies and non-normies need to work together to push back in a larger way against the efforts of the non-normies to run our lives.

Unlike non-normies, I'm open to suggestions for how to do this. Check out my blog. Maybe we can start a counter movement.

Why Biden's Plan makes sense
http://www.controlcongress.com

The key problem is the Kurds, Shiite and Sunni want to have their own homeland unless they are in charge of the other groups. This is why the Biden plan has bipartisan support. What do you think?

ACUF-The now outgoing Central Commander, Gen. John P. Abizaid, told Congress two months ago that more troops were not the answer for Iraq. He specifically said that he had met personally with all of the commanders in the field and all agreed that more soldiers would not help. An anonymous “Army officer who recently commanded a brigade in Baghdad” told the Washington Post bluntly, “The plan will fail.” The “surge” in forces was too small and it did not accord with Iraqi politics because Prime Minister Nouri “Maliki must protect [Moqtada] al-Sadr,” who heads the largest, most aggressive and anti-U.S. Shiite militia but holds 30 seats supporting Maliki’s coalition government.

Each of the Shiite, Kurd and Sunni factions still believe they can prevail at least in slightly larger homelands and have no reason to be reasonable. Based on efforts in Yugoslavia and Lebanon the State Department types think any decent order would take six to 12 years to impose. The generals want none of this. While supporting an increase in troops, cracking down on death squads and ethnic militia, and imprisoning more insurgents, hawks Bing West and Elliot Cohen put the real problem facing the president well. “The paradox of American strategy in Iraq is this: President Bush can achieve success only by threatening to do something he is morally opposed to doing—leaving swiftly and risking chaotic civil strife. If the president showed the same iron will toward Mr. Maliki that he does toward Congress and public opinion, Mr. Maliki would blink first.”

Donald Devine, the editor of Conservative Battleline Online, was the director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management from 1981 to 1985 and is the director of the Federalist Leadership Center at Bellevue University


Dividing
For a nation that has been fairly successful in blending immigrant "minorities" into the mainstream for over 200 years...we sure seem anxious to divide other peoples' countries for our own conveniences. And sorry, I can't imagine the day that I would agree with any original idea the was able to escape the vaccuum that occupies the cavity between Biden's ears. MM

Iraqmire
Celtric-dragon you are exactly right: It isn't happening.

Bush will waste as many American soldiers' lives as he thinks he needs to waste to keep from acknowledging that he lied for neocon reasons.

Bush and company cherry-picked and manipulated the intelligence, and they outright lied to carry us to war, and then they conducted it on the cheap causing unnecessary death and dismemberment of our soldiers. Then to add insult to injury, they've cut the VA short by $3billion while giving hundreds of billions to Halliburton and the other war profiteers.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.