Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 27, 2009
Michael Gerson :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Teleprompter President
by Michael Gerson
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


WASHINGTON -- It is amazing how swiftly a presidential tendency turns from observation to joke to meme. Barack Obama -- called "the most eloquent political speaker of our time" -- has become known as the teleprompter president.

The issue gathered momentum when Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen read 20 seconds of Obama's teleprompter remarks at a White House ceremony before realizing his mistake. Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, at her nomination as head of Health and Human Services, was made to wait in awkward silence while Obama's teleprompter was adjusted. Then came Obama's use of the big-screen autocue at Tuesday night's news conference.

Coverage by Ron Fournier of The Associated Press began: "What kind of politician brings a teleprompter to a news conference?" A recent Politico story asserted, "President Barack Obama doesn't go anywhere without his teleprompter," calling it a "crutch." And in a popular new blog, Obama's teleprompter playfully chronicles its day.

If anyone is to blame for this technological dependence, it is probably Fred Barton, an actor from the 1950s. As author Laurie Brown tells the story, Barton was having trouble memorizing the vast number of lines required for live television. So he conceived of a scrolling screen of typed text -- an idea he shared with Irving Berlin Kahn (the composer's nephew) and Hub Schlafly at 20th Century Fox. Soon the device was used by Milton Berle and actors in various soap operas. In 1952, Schlafly got a call from a man identified simply as the "Chief" who wanted a meeting at the Waldorf-Astoria. It turned out to be former President Herbert Hoover, who ended up using a teleprompter for his remarks at that year's Republican convention.

For politicians, the teleprompter has always been something of an embarrassing vice -- the political equivalent of purchasing cigarettes, Haagen-Dazs and a Playboy at the convenience store.

This derision is based on the belief that the teleprompter exaggerates the gap between image and reality -- that it involves a kind of deception. It is true that there is often a distinction between a president on and off his script. With a teleprompter, Obama can be ambitiously eloquent; without it, he tends to be soberly professorial. Ronald Reagan with a script was masterful; during news conferences he caused much wincing and cringing. It is the rare politician, such as Tony Blair, who speaks off the cuff in beautifully crafted paragraphs.

But it is a mistake to argue that the uncrafted is somehow more authentic. Those writers and commentators who prefer the unscripted, who use "rhetoric" as an epithet, who see the teleprompter as a linguistic push-up bra, do not understand the nature of presidential leadership or the importance of writing to the process of thought.

Governing is a craft, not merely a talent. It involves the careful sorting of ideas and priorities. And the discipline of writing -- expressing ideas clearly and putting them in proper order -- is essential to governing. For this reason, the greatest leaders have taken great pains with rhetoric. Lincoln continually edited and revised his speeches. Churchill practiced to the point of memorization. Such leaders would not haven been improved by being "unplugged." When it comes to rhetoric, winging it is often shoddy and self-indulgent -- practiced by politicians who hear Mozart in their own voices while others perceive random cymbals and kazoos. Leaders who prefer to speak from the top of their heads are not more authentic, they are often more shallow -- not more "real," but more undisciplined.

This is the lasting contribution of Fred Barton and his teleprompter. The speechwriting process that puts glowing words on the teleprompter screen serves a number of purposes. Struggling over the precise formulations of a text clarifies a president's own thinking. It allows others on his staff to have input -- to make their case as a speech is edited. The final wording of a teleprompter speech often brings internal policy debates to a conclusion. And good teamwork between a president and his speechwriters can produce memorable rhetoric -- the kind of words that both summarize a historical moment and transform it.

Obama's goal at his recent news conference was less elevated -- to express his thoughts on the economy with precision, as he faces a crisis in which a stray word could have a tremendous cost.

During a wobbly first two months, Obama has had many problems. But using an autocue isn't one of them. A teleprompter speech represents the elevation of writing in politics. And good writing has an authenticity of its own.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Gerson writes a twice-weekly column for The Post on issues that include politics, global health, development, religion and foreign policy. Michael Gerson is the author of the book "Heroic Conservatism" and a contributor to Newsweek magazine.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Gerson's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
A Poor Excuse
The author's struggle to excuse Obama's dependence on the teleprompter might have some merit if he (Obama) could give a coherent message without one.

George Bush was genuine with or without a teleprompter, and you knew where he stood and what he meant. Not so with Obama.

Obama is an empty suit without his crutch.

Actually,
Chainsaw he's an an empty suit with an equally empty head.

Talking Head
On Tuesday I was wondering why BHO was, for once, giving a speech while looking straight into the camera, instead of speaking while
making his usual 90 degree mechanical head turns. These always varied from 45 degrees to his left to 45 degrees to his right every 1 to 6 seconds or so. At first I thought he finally developed a new speaking style, but then I heard there was just one teleprompter in the room that day, directly in front of him, rather than the two usually placed at the corners of the room in front of him. The only change was the position of the teleprompter...

All that "eloquence" of speaking, as he looks
oh-so-purposeful and intent into the rarefied distance, or somewhere into the crowd, but always at a 45 degree angle to his left or at a 45 degree angle to his right, and always shifting between the two angles at intervals randomly fluctuating from about every half second to about every 6 seconds, is only BHO intently keeping his eyes glued to his teleprompter so he'll know what to say.

There is a difference
Agreed, a teleprompter is a useful crutch.
Agreed, it makes the speaker seem more than non scripted rhetoric does.

The difference is in the writing, and by whom.
President Reagan wrote a lot of his speeches even before he was governor. And while he did stumble without a prepared speech, he at least knew his subject.

President Obama, on the other hand, is not the main author of his speeches. And after two years campaigning and two months in office shows little grasp of any subject.

Well then...

Why don't we take it a step further an allow someone else to give the speech? It's one thing to need a 'script' for the long speeches, but to require it for every outing is ridiculous. Whatever happened to notes??
There is an issue here and I think it has more to do with cognizance of the subjects at hand. Obama seems incapable of making any clear points at all without TOTUS.

The Puppet is not allowed to speak
When this punk sold his soul to the Bilderberg Group he agreed to let them script his presentations. They know what they want said to facilitate the destruction of our country and create their new world order. Honestly, stop calling this fool "brilliant" and an inspiring speaker - he is neither. We are on the cusp of either a revolution or a complete downfall in this nation. Pick your side.

Hoo-hah!
That's all I have to say about the "soberly professional" line. A bumbling tongue-tied doofus is closer to it.

And to those of us with eyes to see and brains to think, he was known as the Teleprompter Candidate a year ago. Not a thing has changed since then.

teleprompter
I think you really gave the president some slack because I think he uses a teleprompter to help him remember all the lies he has told. You know if you tell the truth it is easy to speak but if you lie all the time like he does it is really hard to keep track of which lie you told to which group.

a script is not ...
a teleprompter ... a prepared speech is not a teleprompter ... Obama cannot give a speech without a prompter ... period ... its a crutch ...

He is an eloquent READER ... not an eloquent speaker ...

Whose Words?
Something the author of this column fails to note is that while Lincoln and Churchill used notes or memorized their speeches, they were memorizing or reading THEIR OWN WORDS. Lincoln did not have a team of speechwriters to craft the Gettysburg Address.

Barack Obama, like most modern presidents, is basically an actor. The fact that he needs a teleprompter to remember his lines puts him in the same category as soap opera divas.

Gerson you are done...
Written by a washed up speech writer and ex-conservative.

Obama is a boring drone, in case you haven't noticed.

Teleprompter
Obama problem is, he sounds like Cliff, the mailman character from Cheers, without his teleprompter. I still can't beleive he got away with saying he had visited all 57 states during the campaign.

Howdy Doody
Obama is about as eloquent as Howdy Doody used to be, and for the same reason.

We will see the real Obama when there is a power filure during a crisis and somebody hides his binkie. I hope someone is around to record that day. It will be priceless.

You would
be surprised to learn that many of his speeches come from Socialist Party Teachers in Chicago.

When asked a question in one of his so called town meetings, he comes back with a few ums,ahs & ers until his mentors quickly put up the desired response.

It is very embarrassing to watch.

oBUMa
This empty-suit charlatan is nothing more than a very skilled flim-flam man, a huckster of great wool-pulling skill.

He is the beneficiary of a rare occurence in this country - the wrong man at the wrong time glorified and elevated to the highest office in the land by, inarguably, the dumbest, most ill-informed, shallow, ignorant electorate to have ever existed in this country.

God save us from this socialist menace who hasn't has an original thought since he began worshiping Alinsky.

good point
in that particularly the President in a formal context has to be very careful of his words. For something like the State of the Union address, Bush had it written out. Otherwise, he workedfrom note cards. If it's all teleprompter, though, I wonder whether Obama is giving a speech or just reading one. Is there any "there" there? What happens when he is in a sit-down with Russia or Iran. You can't teleprompter everything.

Why Not
Just print out the speeches and hand them out? You get the real meat by cutting out the "charisma" factor. Folks, his speeches without him speaking them are awful.

That said, if you're in a Q&A session where you don't know what may be thrown at you, a prompter is a very bad idea. Q&A sessions are supposed to be off the cuff remarks. By bringing a prompter, you give off the (in Obama's case, legitimate) air that you're only allowing pre-packaged questiones, meaning anything with meat will not get answered because they weren't selected before hand, much like his online White House question answering session.

Lemon
"You can't teleprompter everything"

I wouldn't be surprised if he tries.

What About Truth in Advertising?
Interesting spin Mr. Gerson. But you seem to have missed the main point of all those people complaining about the president's constant use of the teleprompter: he was sold to us as someone who didn't need it.

Barack Obama was supposed to be this eloquent man, with a firm grasp on the situation at hand and the admirable ability to speak with strength and conviction. We now find that he's actually ignorant on most subjects, relies heavily on speechwriters, and has great trouble answering simple questions if he hasn't been given them in advance so that the speechwriters could fashion a response.

When Mr. Obama delivered his great speech on race last spring, we were told how this proved he was everything his admirers ever said he was; only later did we learn that he didn't write the speech and, based on his actions, didn't believe much of what he said in it.

We were sold a president who understood our problems and ensured us he had real solutions. But all we seem to have gotten is a talking head that reads other people's writing well and offers the same tired "tax-and-spend/grant the government more authority" proposals that have been the hallmark of the Democrats for the last 100 years.

Mr. Obama made his campaign about "change", so where's the change? George W. Bush could read from a teleprompter too. He may have mangled the words occasionally, but at least he could go off script when he had to.

Obama's teleprompter
Obama's teleprompter simply serves to keep his core convictions and character, or lack thereof, secret from the American people. Everytime he comments off-the-cuff, we are given a glimpse of what he truly thinks and how different his agenda is from what he campaigned on. I have to believe that most American's still believe that we have been blessed with the greatest country on the planet and that they would not have cast their vote for Barak Obama had they known that his intent was to dismantle it from within, all along.

One more thing
"But it is a mistake to argue that the uncrafted is somehow more authentic."

This, Mr. Gerson, is patently false when applied to politicians, and you as someone who has worked with them should know that.

A politician speaking off the cuff is far more likely to tell you what they really think than a politician reading from a prepared script. Because scripts are prepared to argue a point, in whatever words the writer thinks will make you believe what you are hearing, whereas someone speaking without a script has only their own thoughts and beliefs to work from. And it is exactly there that Mr. Obama has proven to be such a failure.

justpaul
Amen brother, Amen!!! You said pretty much what I was thinking when I read this pile of poop: When you are supposed to be the reincarnation of Aristotle, Socrates, or Plato in speaking to the masses, you are not supposed to need promoter for a six minute speech!

All of the education that this guy has goes to waste any time he is asked to speak without a prompter or without a prepared script. I can do better than this clod because of my public speaking teacher at the community college where I started out (Rockingham Community College, located in scenic Wentworth, NC). Whe we had to give speeches, we were never allowed to have the entire speech at the podium with us; just a on sheet speakers note or a few notecards with major points of emphasis. You see, the reason she set that as a ground rule was so that we had to KNOW our topics and UNDERSTAND those topics for ourselves; that way we didn't need to read a speech to get the informatiomn across, and we could answer the questions we had to field after our presentations. Maybe Obama needs to try that, instead of relying on TOTUS so much.

TOTUS
TOTUS must tell Obama what to say, otherwise the inarticulate stammering and stuttering will expose the big lie that the Organizer-in-Chief is a 'great communicator.' Just like everything else about this man, his vaunted communication skills are a myth. In addition, Obama can't contain his true thoughts if TOTUS isn't in control and mentally deficient supporters might inadvertently learn the truth about him. I wonder if TOTUS receives Secret Service protection? I hope so, because it is the most important part of the administration.

Re: Glowbama!!!
This clown is like something out of the pre-WWII Germany, with the Americorp and all the propoganda crap that was in this era of history and now the same thing is occuring here before our very eyes, and I think theres the same amount of apathy that was rampant then and I think that it is going on now, if Americans don't wake up this will be another Nazi state!!!

I remember a debate...
when McCain, for once, got under the One's skin regarding nuclear energy. The One said, "I'm not opposed to nuclear waste." Huh?

And how about his remarks to Joe the Plumber, or the SF fundraiser about all those "bitter clingers" in PA? Brilliant orator? Hardly.

The commenters here are correct. Without a teleprompter, Obama comes off as a radical Leftist or an outright moron. Even an Obama supporter wrote recently that we may have a President who is as dumb as George Bush sounded.

You people are idiots
Anyone who thinks Obama can't speak well without a teleprompter needs to go find the transcript of his last press conference ( or any other press conference) and look at the off-the-cuff answers he gives. He speaks beautifully, and sensibly and thoroughly. There was no one in that press room the other night who had a better command of the issues than Obama.

The disconnect between what right wingers believe and reality these days is astonishing. It's because you people don't actually listen to or read what Obama says. You only listen to the right wing spin monkeys. And you think that they're giving it to you straight.

Go read Krugman in the NYTimes today. He's alarmed at how much Obama trusts the free market capitalists on Wall St. But you people believe that he is out to destroy capitalism!

When you folks talk to people outside of your tight knit circle of right wing pals, do you get funny looks?

Ever wonder why?

Try getting your news from someone other than those lying sacks of garbage on right wing rant radio. They are turning you into mind numbed robots.

Phylo out.

more right wing lunacy
You people probably believe that Obama has banned the term Global War on terror", right? Because that's what Sean Hannity told you to believe.

Wrong again:

From today's POLITICO:

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell calls to make clear that nobody has banned the phrase "Global War on Terror."

"I have used and continue to use that term, as do many here in the building. But there are alternatives that are just as fitting," he said. "We are not wed to any one nomenclature."

"We are still actively engaged in a global war against terror," he said.

Morrell drew some blogospheric attention, including here, for using a different phrase in a briefing yesterday -- though he was equally careful to note then that there was no rule against the phrase."



Now Gerson, right wing propagandist extraordinaire, tells you that Rush's ridiculing of Obama for using a teleprompter is ridiculous, and you think Gerson is spinning. What?!

Have you fools ever seen Sarah Palin without a teleprompter? There is a reason why the campaign didn't allow here to do a single press conference before the election. SHE DOESN"T KNOW WHAT SHE"S TALKIN ABOUT! And everyone but you people seems to understand that.

You people are being brainwashed. Snap out of it.

Phylo out.

Oh good Lord!
So, without a teleprompter, President Reagan made Mr. Gershon wince. Well, that explains the majority of the commentary here, written without either discipline or threaded thought.

The key element in a news conference is to gain the "unscripted" thoughts of the President. We want to know what is really on his mind, and not that which his speechwriters wants us to hear. I can understand needing a teleprompter during a State of the Union speech as this is laying out policy goals for the Congress and the nation as a whole. Needing a prompter for a news conference, though, is evidence that the President and his handlers don't want people to know the President's real intent, and to cloud same with rhetorical device. Did we not hear supporters of BO proclaiming him to be strikingly intelligent. Does his teleprompter addiction speak to that intellect or to a facade which we are supposed to admire?

Actually, I think that BO is at his most honest when he is without his "crutch" such as when he paraphrased the Communist Manifesto in his interaction with "Joe the Plumber."

Barney Fife, Mr. Gershon's alter ego, writes again.

Bushisms
10) "Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream." —LaCrosse, Wis., Oct. 18, 2000 (Listen to audio clip)

9) "I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family." —Greater Nashua, N.H., Jan. 27, 2000(Listen to audio clip)

8) "I hear there's rumors on the Internets that we're going to have a draft." —second presidential debate, St. Louis, Mo., Oct. 8, 2004 (Listen to audio clip)

7) "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." —Saginaw, Mich., Sept. 29, 2000 (Listen to audio clip)

6) "You work three jobs? … Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." —to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005 (Listen to audio clip)

5) "Too many good docs are getting out of the business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love with women all across this country." —Poplar Bluff, Mo., Sept. 6, 2004 (Watch video clip; listen to audio clip)

4) "They misunderestimated me." —Bentonville, Ark., Nov. 6, 2000

3) "Rarely is the questioned asked: Is our children learning?" —Florence, S.C., Jan. 11, 2000

2) "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we." —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004 (Watch video clip; listen to audio clip)

1) "There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." —Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002 (Watch video clip; listen to audio clip)

That is what Bush sounds like without a teleprompter.

And guess what? Bush used a telepromter for his speeches too!

Again, the disconnect between right wing reality and actual reality is astonishing. It's mind-blowing.

Teleprompter or not
The question is does he do what he said he would do during the campaign. Yes and no.
Transparent. No. Legislation on Internet before passage. No. No earmarks. Yes. Those are just a few, but they are very telling. Does what is said agree with what is done-that is the important thing not whether it is teleprompted or spontaneous.
Donald W. Bales

John
Do yourself a favor and go read the transcript of his latest press conference. Only the initial remarks are off the teleprompter. The rest is all off-the-cuff. Find the most egregiously silly remarks and reprint them here so that we can all see what a moron Obama is. Okay? I dare you. And no cherry picking. Use the quotes in full context.

I double dare you.





Phylo
I would rather have a President that can speak without a teleprompter even if he makes mistake.What we have now is a guy that does not write his own speeches but also one that could not present it unless he read it like a school kid.

When he goes on his own he stumbles and is uncoordinated.With President Bush we used to say it was natural because he was stupid but we forgive President Obama because he is the smart one.

I want to hear what my President has to say and not some other individual or group behind him. If I wanted that, anyone could read the speech on the writers behalf, case closed.

There is no authenticity anymore and it is all just a major production like on a movie set.If our Presidents only have to say what others feed him, why have one to begin with?

I would rather have him make some mistakes and apologize for them instead of being a fake.

Dr J
What I wrote to John applies to you too.

Wouldn't care, but...
I really wouldn't care that Obama uses the teleprompter...if we hadn't been subjected to over a year of fawning adulation by the media about how articulate he is, how well he expresses himself, ad nauseum. And at the same time, getting a daily barrage of how moronic Bush was, how he couldn't string more than a couple of words together, etc. etc.

You live by the sword, sometimes, the sword will come back to take a slice out of you.

More right wing nonsense
I'm sure you all believe that Obama's approval numbers have been "tanking". Because that's what all of the right wing radio hosts have been telling you to believe. Right?

Here is the average of most major polls.

RCP Average 03/09 - 03/24 -- 60.8 30.8 +30.0


Note that that is precisely the opposite of Bush. The same 30% who loved Bush disapprove of Obama. Why? Because those are the people who believe what right wing radio says. those are the same people who think Saddam had something to do with Islamic terrorism, too. The rest of us, the 60%, live in the real world.

By the way, there is a reason right wing talk show hosts are always quoting Rasmussen. They ALWAYS lean to the right. They were always showing much higher approval ratings for Bush than all the other polls. they must only do their polling in AR, TX, AL, MS.

Phylo out.

Obamateleprompterama
For a news conference? That is the sign of someone who is unsure of himself and one who is unwilling to answer questions that aren't already scripted - such as in preselecting reporters to be called on. What crap!

If you are not one of Obama's favorite softball pitchers, you will never get to ask a question. I would love to see him try to handle the hostile media as well as President Bush did, especially questions that begin with diatribes from idiots like Helen Thomas who really believes that her liberalism is mainstream a mark of her journalistic professionalism. She is in the same class as Keith Olbermann when it comes to journalistic bias.

Back to the point; Obama can't handle press conferences like that. Only friendly questions allowed. No skepticism allowed. No criticism allowed. Be nice or get out! He is a lying, sneaky wimp where everything is his way or the highway.

Phylo - Fair Challenge - Cherry Picking
Phylo - you have 8 years of Bushisms from which to pull, and we have less than 70 days, but also a campaign.

I, unfortunately, have a meeting to hold (part of having a job so I can support those without one) and have to run.

More later.

Regards,

Phylo's "real world"
Phylo obviously bought the hope and change line. We think for ourselves. We listen to other sources of information, not just the "right wing" and then we think about it. We don't take them at face value, we think beyond it, we think about what's hidden in their message. The NYT's article? It's out there to pacify people, manipulate them into thinking that Obama's not out to destroy this country. I guess you are one of the many that ignore who he associated with and his lies.

Obama, off the cuff, rambles without answering questions. He's long winded, not eloquent and if you had actually listened to the press conference, you would have heard that, too.

I would have liked to give Phylo the benefit of the doubt but frankly, I just consider Phylo stupid and angry. Why else would Phylo have to come on here and rant and insult people? Phylo is closeminded and refuses to look at other viewopoints rationally.

You keep signing, "Phylo out" but you never go.

Wants to do too much
Of course, when one's goal is to manage every iota of the lives and businesses of nearly 300 million people, it's difficult to know what one might need to say. If one's goal (as it should be) were to manage the federal government to protect the lives, liberty, and property of it's citizens, policy and answers to any question would be too easy to require any prompting.

Phylo
As someone who has had to speak in front of large audiences that has included some pretty powerful people, I would like to see you try and talk intelligently without any fumbles. You love to bash Bush, but you forget he was a Harvard grad too. He also has an MBA, something they don't just give away. IF he is stupid, then Obamba must be so as well. Obama is someone who can not formulate a coherant thought without stringing it together with a lot of "umms, ahhhhs, and errrrs"! Additionally, when he speaks extemporaneously, he will consistently put both feet in his mouth yet amazingly not fall. That's because the media won't let him!

Phylo
Hussein Obama has never been in front of a crowd without a teleprompter......not even once.
When he is asked a question, he already knows the question and his handlers have already provided the answer.

And to: a...Obama's memberable quotes are um,er,ah,um,uh um, etc.

David
You do not know what you are talking about. Go read the latest transcript from his press conference and tell me he can't string together coherent thoughts. Watch the press conference. he isn't stammering all over the place. He is in complete command of the subject matter, and he dominated the room. It's obvious that you didn't watch the press conference.

Phylo
so Obama took questions? Hand picked and delivered slow pitch style.

Unqualified extraordinaire
Obama isn't qualified to be a kindergarten teacher -- forget being President of the United States. ALL he can do is read from a Teleprompter. He offers NOTHING ELSE other than a walking talking embodiment of the greatest narcissism to ever be seen in the free world.

The sooner this incompetent Socialist is completely gone, the better.

While I think about it, the same goes for Phylo. "Phylo out." If only, if only....

Oh, pleeeeeze
That Q and A was staged. He CALLED on certain reporters/journalists and asked if they were there AND he had notes.

He knew what the questions were going to be ahead of time. Soft questions on top of that.

Phoney baloney Kenyan president.

If Obama did this...
What would you people say if Obama had an exchange like this one with Bush and Marth Raditz.

Q But do you think we’re winning? Do you think we’re winning?
THE PRESIDENT: I do, I think we’re making good progress. I do, yes.
Q Can I just add to that, a couple weeks ago –
THE PRESIDENT: No, you can’t. This is the second follow-up. You usually get one follow-up, and I was nice enough to give you one. I didn’t give anybody on this side a follow-up, and now you are trying to take a second follow-up.
Q They didn’t try.
THE PRESIDENT: I know you try.
Yes.
Q Can I just say –
THE PRESIDENT: They just cut off your mic. You can’t, no.
Q A couple weeks ago you said –
THE PRESIDENT: Now she’s going to go without the mic. This is awesome. (Laughter.)
Q A couple weeks ago you said that in Iraq, in 2006, you said we were winning and the strategy was working to keep up troop morale.
THE PRESIDENT: Yes.
Q How can we believe that you’re not doing the same thing here?
THE PRESIDENT: You tried to ask me that question before. It’s a repeat. Look, I said –
Q No, I’m talking –
THE PRESIDENT: Can I finish, please? The question you asked me before at the exclusive I gave you on the ranch was: You said that we were winning in the past. I also said that there was tough fighting. Make sure you put the comments in place.
So what I’m going to tell you now is, we’re making progress in Afghanistan, but there’s tough fighting. I’m under no illusions that this isn’t tough. I know full well we’re dealing with a determined enemy. I believe it’s in our interest that we defeat that enemy. And so, yes, we’re making progress. But it’s also a tough battle. We’re facing people who are willing to strap bombs on themselves and walk into places where the innocent dwell, or the innocent shop, and kill them.

Wow, what an exhibition of grace under pressure, huh?

Slow Talker.

It is almost impossible to communicate an important idea perfectly on the first try. Every good writer has to have the scrip edited many times before it is published. It would be wrong to demand that the president blurt out his every thought at the top of his head. We would be missing a more focused idea by demanding spontaneity. The teleprompter helps the president share thoughts that might have been edited many times. It is a great way of communicating what is truly on his mind.

Not an Issue
David from IL basically has it right. Some of us just can't speak without the crutch of a written-out statement in front of us. When I worked at the Pentagon, I wouldn't dream of getting up in front of the generals and "ya-knowing" and "err-ing" my way through a presentation. Thank goodness Obama spares us the dead air time and uses the teleprompter. Just like Bush.

Really, Mr. Gerson, is that the best you can come up with? Slow news day?

Phylo
Your oblivious to everything. Yes he can't string a cohesive sentence together without a teleprompter. you know it, everyone else knows it. I do know what I am talking about. If only you knew where I worked! The man is way in over his head, as are you!

planet Gene
When were you at the Pentagon? I was there way back in 94/95.

Obama press conf...
Let's start off with Jennifer Loven, A.P.

Question: Thank you, Mr. President. Your treasury secretary and the Fed chairman were on Capitol Hill today asking for this new authority that you want to regulate big, complex financial institutions.

But given the problems that the financial bailout program has had so far -- banks not wanting to talk about how they're spending the money, the AIG bonuses that you mentioned -- why do you think the public should sign on for another new sweeping authority for the government to take over companies, essentially?

Obama: Well, keep in mind that it is precisely because of the lack of this authority that the AIG situation has gotten worse.

Now, understand that AIG is not a bank. It's an insurance company. If it were a bank and it had effectively collapsed, then the FDIC could step in, as it does with a whole host of banks, as it did with IndyMac, and in a structured way renegotiate contracts, get rid of bad assets, strengthen capital requirements, resell it on the private marketplace.

So we've got a regular mechanism whereby we deal with FDIC- insured banks. We don't have that same capacity with an institution like AIG. And that's part of the reason why it has proved so problematic.

I think a lot of people understandably say, "Well, if we're putting all this money in there, and if it's such a big systemic risk to allow AIG to liquidate, why is it that we can't restructure some of these contracts? Why can't we do some of the things that need to be done in a more orderly way?"

to be continued



Obama's answer continued
And the reason is, is because we have not obtained this authority. We should have obtained it much earlier so that any institution that poses a systemic risk that could bring down the financial system we can handle and we can do it in an orderly fashion that quarantines it from other institutions.

We don't have that power right now; that's what Secretary Geithner was talking about. And I think that there's going to be strong support from the American people and from Congress to provide that authority, so that we don't find ourselves in a situation where we've got to choose between either allowing an enormous institution like AIG, which is not just insuring other banks, but is also insuring pension funds and potentially putting people's 401(k)s at risk if it goes under, that's one choice, and then the other choice is just to allow them to take taxpayer money without the kind of conditions that we'd like to see on it.

So that's -- that's why I think the authority is so important.

Question: Why should the public trust the government to handle that authority well?

Obama: Well, as I said before, if you look at how the FDIC has handled a situation like Indy bank, for example, it actually does these kinds of resolutions effectively when it's got the tools to do it. We don't have the tools right now.



Ummm, sounds to me like that's a person who knows how to string together a coherent thought, David. Notice the lack of ums and ahs. They put those in the transcript when they are there. Go listen to him deliver the answer if you don't believe me.

I must agree...
While it might be a fun distraction, conservatives who want to make a big deal about Obama’s use of the teleprompter are grasping at straws. During the campaign there was much ado about Obama’s dependency on the teleprompter. As a result, conservatives made gleeful predictions of Obama’s inevitable doom once the live debates took place. I waited eagerly to see him embarrass himself and throw victory to McCain, only to see that he was able to hold his own (and many even declared him the winner).

The teleprompter fixation tactic reminds me of something that the Left might do, since their strategy often involves perpetual ridicule of unimportant traits of their opponents (as they did with Bush, Palin and countless others). It is very effective and I’ve always been one to say we should fight fire with fire, but on the other hand I hate stooping to their level and with Obama there’s so much more important stuff to go after. Besides, conservatives might someday finally have a great candidate who also uses the teleprompter, and then this silly strategy will come back to haunt us.

There’s so much more we could focus on. How about the continuous disconnect between what Obama SAYS and what he actually DOES? As in when he says he wants to reduce the deficit, then proposes a budget that skyrockets our debt. Or as in when he says he wants more accountability from teachers, then supports the unions that are the biggest roadblock to teacher accountability. Or when he says he’s against lobbyists, then puts them in his cabinet. There’s no shortage of material to work with. Just as the “flip-flopper” label was a meaningful and effective tactic to defeat John Kerry, we should focus on Obama’s many flaws with tactics that are both effective AND relevant.

Still, I must admit I love Limbaugh’s satiric take on Obama’s teleprompter use.

From the press conference
OK, Chip Reid?

Question: Thank you, Mr. President. At both of your town hall meetings in California last week, you said, quote, "I didn't run for president to pass on our problems to the next generation."

But under your budget, the debt will increase $7 trillion over the next 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office says $9.3 trillion. And today on Capitol Hill, some Republicans called your budget, with all the spending on health care, education and environment, the most irresponsible budget in American history.

Obama: Yes.

Question: Isn't that kind of debt exactly what you were talking about when you said "passing on our problems to the next generation"?

Obama: First of all, I suspect that some of those Republican critics have a short memory, because, as I recall, I'm inheriting a $1.3 trillion deficit, annual deficit, from them. That would be point number one.

Point number two. Both under our estimates and under the CBO estimates, both -- the most conservative estimates out there, we drive down the deficit over the first five years of our budget. The deficit is cut in half. And folks aren't disputing that.

Where the dispute comes in is what happens in a whole bunch of out-years. And the main difference between the budget that we presented and the budget that came out of the Congressional Budget Office is assumptions about growth.

They're assuming a growth rate of 2.2 percent; we're assuming a growth rate of 2.6 percent. Those small differences end up adding up to a lot of money. Our assumptions are perfectly consistent with what Blue Chip forecasters out there are saying.

to be continued

answer continued
Now, none of us know exactly what's going to happen 6 or 8 or 10 years from now. Here's what I do know: If we don't tackle energy, if we don't improve our education system, if we don't drive down the costs of health care, if we're not making serious investments in science and technology and our infrastructure, then we won't grow 2.6 percent, we won't grow 2.2 percent. We won't grow.

And so what we've said is, let's make the investments that ensure that we meet our growth targets that put us on a pathway to growth as opposed to a situation in which we're not making those investments and we still have trillion-dollar deficits.

And there's an interesting reason why some of these critics haven't put out their own budget. I mean, we haven't seen an alternative budget out of them.

And the reason is because they know that, in fact, the biggest driver of long-term deficits are the huge health care costs that we've got out here that we're going to have to tackle and we -- that if we don't deal with some of the structural problems in our deficit, ones that were here long before I got here, then we're going to continue to see some of the problems in those out-years.

Amateur phylo-se-phiser, (philsopher)
sol
Location: CA
Reply # 43
Date: Mar 18, 2009 - 10:21 AM EST
Oh My ! Phylo Se Fiser
came across this post:

Welcome to elephantslayer.com.

Are you tired of seeing bogus Republican arguments win over the hearts and minds of too many of our fellow citizens? Well, this is the place where bogus Republican arguments come to die. I'll select a few of the bogus Republican arguments of the day, and the I'll break down why the arguments are bogus. I'm new at this whole blogging thing, so we'll see how it goes.

I also like to harass right wing columnists over at townhall.com under the pen name Phylo Se Fiser, which is a reference to the fact that I am an amateur philosopher. I'm currently working on a book that will correct the metaphysical problems underlying most of Western philosophy. I'll make some of that available as soon as I can figure out how to do that.

Looking forward to any comments. I love a good debate.

Matt Mullen

Phylo
You haven't seen the alternative budget/ideas because the democrat s and Obama ignored them. The republicans have an alternative but you won't hear about it.

And your answer to all these problems is to spend trillions of dollars?
Just fix the insurance premiums...no need to trash the whole healthcare system and create more problems than we have now.


Interesting transcript...
Quoted from The Patriot Post, Friday 13, 2009

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Barack Obama took that adage to heart when he dialed up The New York Times to clarify his answer to an earlier question posed by their reporter about whether the president is a socialist. We here know the correct answer is "yes," but Obama decided to dance around the issue.

We might note that Obama without a teleprompter is like a fish out of water. He began, "See, uhhh, I -- I -- eh -- Just one thing that, uhh, I was thinking about as I was, uhh, -- as I was -- getting off the, uhhh, copter 'cause, I -- uhhh -- you know, it was hard for me to believe you were entirely serious about that socialist question." (Hat tip to Rush Limbaugh's team for the painful transcript.)

Obama continued, "Uh, and so I think that, uh, it's important just to note, uhh, when you start, uhh, hearing folks, uhh, throw these words around, thaaat, um, uh, we've actually been operating, uh, in a way that, uh, is entirely consistent with free market principles, uh, and that, uhhh, uh, some of the same folks who are uh, throwing the word 'socialist' around can't say the same." And he wasn't done yet: "I -- I -- I -- I just think it's c-clear that by the time we had, uhhhhh. By the time we, eh, uh, got here, uhhh, ummm, there already had been, uh, an enormous infusion of taxpayer money into the financial system, aaand, eh, eh, eh, y-y-yuh-y-y-yuh.... The thing I constantly try to emphasize to people is that, if coming in the market was doing fine, nobody would be happier than me, uh, to stay out of it. Uh, you know, I -- I -- I have more than enough to do, uh, without having to worry about the financial system. Uh, and the fact that, uh, we've had to take these extraordinary measures, uh, and intervene, uh, is, uhh, not an indication of my ideological preferences."

End of quote

Responses...
Some trolls come here and think they are shining some self-constructed 'beam of light' on the world as the spew ridiculous nonsense on these threads (many to feed their own warped egos, as phylo admits on his own web-blog).
To those on the threads whose brains have not been washed and repainted, you merely look like tools wielded by malevolent hands (and dull ones at that).

You're out, alright.
Waaay out there.

boo
oh, that's embarrassing.

Can we have the cowboy back?

Sharon
The Republicans came out with their budget yesterday. I heard all about it. It is considered a total joke because it has no numbers in it. It's all empty slogans about supporting the private sector and being responsible with taxpayer money. They can't even tell you what the deficit will be with their plan.

Even Eric Cantor is distancing himself from what Boehner put out yesterday.


Don
I gave up on that website because i don;t have the time to keep it up and promote it. But if you're willing to help me promote it, maybe I'll reconsider.

phylo
Your opinion.

Given your previous opinions posted here, I think I'll pass.

Phylo's easily impressed...

Phylo: “Ummm, sounds to me like that's a person who knows how to string together a coherent thought, David. Notice the lack of ums and ahs.”

Ummm, sounds to me like you’re a person who cannot see the forest for the trees. Are you really so impressed with Obama’s ability to complete a coherent sentence that you are oblivious to the actual text of what he’s saying?

If the first place, he makes the case that AIG cannot fail because it is not FDIC insured, as the banks are. Well so what? If AIG had gone to bankruptcy, as it should have in the first place, and if the bankruptcy had jeapordized the banks, THEN FDIC insurance could have rightly come into play. And it probably would not cost us any more than what we’ve had to spend (and will continue to spend) to prop up AIG, except now we’ve made a mess of everything. So the FDIC argument makes no sense.

Furthermore, as Obama’s own economic advisor, Christine Romer, said in an interview with Fox News, allowing AIG to fall into bankruptcy would have enabled the company to renegotiate the infamous bonuses that the Obama administration failed to stop when it bailed the company out.

Obama is using the crisis and current state of fear in this country to make a dangerous power grab for the ‘government.’ As a liberal you’re incapable of seeing this objectively but understand this: the ‘government’ is simply another name for the people who get to make the rules. You may be happy with the people pulling the strings right now, but when the music stops and people switch seats, you might finally understand what’s wrong with giving away your power to the ‘government.’

David
I've given you two of Obama's off-the-cuff answers from his most recent press conference. Do you still want to claim that he can't string a decent sentence together without a teleprompter? The facts refute your claim so thoroughly that I hope you have the integrity to admit your error. I could find countless other examples of his eloquence if you like.

I hope you don't have a powerful position. Someone with your lack of discernment should be no where near the levers of power.

Obama butt boy
Let’s be honest here, without the teleprompter, you got nothing but a stammering, stumbling Obama. This journalist, along with all the other Obama butt boys will continue to make excuses for this narcissist with not only his need of a teleprompter, but everything else concerning this empty suit.

This is so typical and so hypocritical of the MSM. President Bush was treated so viciously by the MSM. Yet, he took it like a man. He did not whine, or complain that conservatives or republicans should stop listening to them. He didn’t have his chief of staff or press secretary trying to shut up those who didn’t agree with him.

Not the case with Obama, who is a disgrace to the office of the presidency. He is wimpy, whiny man-child, who cares not for the American people or the country. You can take the boy out of the country, but you cannot take the country out of the boy… Obama is and always will be a community agitator from Chicago... a thug!

Ken
very well said.
And that's the truth.

CW
CW writes: Are you really so impressed with Obama’s ability to complete a coherent sentence that you are oblivious to the actual text of what he’s saying?

Phylo: No CW. I'm simply trying to refute the stupid charge made by David and every other person on this thread; that Obama can't complete a coherent sentence without the aid of a teleprompter.

So thank you for helping me to make my argument.

As for his actual answer, he is asking for the authority to do with AIG what the FDIC does with failed banks, which is a process that works rather well. Makes sense to me. I understand that you would let AIG fail. I don't think you've fully considered the ramifications of that choice. It would be a disaster. It might even lead to a total collapse of our financial system. You're prepared to accept that?

flap ears and his teleprompter
he needs the crutch of the teleprompter because his only skill is reading the talking points his handlers put on his machine.

With no management experience and no management skills he is both clueless aboput the problems and the solutions.

His has one remedy for everything, more gov't spending is needed for everything. The net result is more gov't and more gov't employees

But that's the problem for the country. We have out of control growth and spending by gov't. We have a congress comprised of special interest lackeys who act as though the treasury is their persoanl piggy bank.

The messiah promised no pork spending under his administration yet analysts tell us 90% of the $800 billion porkzilla is just pork and there were 9,000 pork projects in the supplemental spending that flap ears had to have to address the economic meltdown we are experiencing.

So flap ears gets in front of his teleprompter, reads his talking points and the trols and the msm swoon at his supposed speaking gifts.

But it seems that will they are in hypnotic trance from his speaking style they are unable to discern the meaning of what he is saying.

Unfortunately when his words are fully analyzed it will be too late

Mike
I used that "Moniker" because only a child, would follow this path. How long will the "Idiots" decry the president and his use of a teleprompter. The explaining of complicated issues requires certain "Aids". The American people deserve information that is correct. President Obama is not an "Economist",as is the case with most Americans. We all know, that Americans, are the least knowledgeable when it comes to economics. At the age of 47,President Obama is using the "Tools" of his generation(Technology). If he is a little too "Uppity",then maybe you should take away his "Toys". He's already gone too far for some of your "Good Americans". If the republicans are to have any chance in 2010,someone might start defining some "Issues". Ya Think...

Sharon
Don't take my word for it:

Posted: Thursday, March 26, 2009 2:43 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: Congress, Republicans, Economy
From NBC's Mark Murray
Yesterday, House Republicans made a pretty big deal about unveiling their budget alternative.

In fact, we received this email from a House GOP spokeswoman, "Given the President’s comments [Tuesday] night that, 'we haven’t seen a budget out of [Republicans],' we wanted to make sure to make you all aware that we are introducing our Republican Budget Alternative tomorrow."

And then what happens today? House Republicans release a 19-page document that contains no hard spending numbers or deficit projections. Per the AP, "One of the few hard bits of information is a promise to simplify the tax code and cut income tax rates to 10 percent for people making $100,000 or less down. They also promise to cut domestic spending below current levels but don't say whether they are exempting Social Security. It's impossible to determine the projected deficit based on their offering.


Of course, that's only coming from the mainstream media, not far right talk show hosts, so you probably won't accept it.

Now the Republicans are saying that the "real" budget is coming next week. Ah huh.

Phylo
The stupid charge? It's obvious to everyone. As long as he can read then he sounds intelligent. You have your head so far stuck somewhere you can't see the light!

phylo
you said a mouthful when you said the liberal media said it. NBC to be precise. They, like you, will say anything to protect the Kenyan president.


Phylo
your a complete idiot. I don't even know why I bother to respond to you. I have had actual work to do, so have been away for a while, but you have continued to drivel away trying to annoy me. Guess I hit a nerve huh? Guess my job is done. Doubt if I actually accomplished anything except to point out what every one on here already knows...your an imbecile!

Ken
From Wikipedia: Michael John Gerson (born May 15, 1964, New Jersey) is an op-ed columnist for The Washington Post and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.[1] He served as President George W. Bush's chief speechwriter from 2001 until June 2006, as a senior policy advisor from 2000 through June 2006, and was a member of the White House Iraq Group.[2]


Ken says that Michael Gerson is an Obama "butt boy". And Sharon says: Very well said Ken."

Yes, clearly, the former Bush speech writer is blinded by his love for Obama.

That is too precious. Keep up the good work, you two.

Ken then says: "This is so typical and so hypocritical of the MSM. President Bush was treated so viciously by the MSM. Yet, he took it like a man. He did not whine, or complain that conservatives or republicans should stop listening to them. He didn’t have his chief of staff or press secretary trying to shut up those who didn’t agree with him."

Go see my post at 10:21 am Ken. That's Bush "takin it like a man?" And are you forgetting that he and Cheney had Wilson wife exposed as a CIA agent because Wilson wrote an op-ed?

You have a lot to learn Ken.

you just gotta see this

That's fine...
But it can also indicate great insecurity and vanity, if not pronounced ego. It could perhaps show a President so focussed on his image that substance is lacking...which seems to be the case here.

killer the clown
again with your never ending need to display stupidity.

The thing flap ears and the dims fail to explain is the long term cost of his never ending deficits.

Fools like you fail to understand the long term effects of these deficits, their costs and how they will be repaid.

You are just that stupid that you think passing on the debt to children and grandchildren yet born is how to pay for flap ears dream of a socialist agenda.

But the reason the messiah needs the teleprompter is because he ain't bright enough to explain anything without a teleprompter. But he can read the talking points his handlers put in front of him.

That the fool requires a teleprompter to introduce someone proves he is of very limited intelligence and that he becomes a mumbling idiot without his best pal proves he is an idiot

Thus if these issues are that complicated why should anyone believe flap ears understands them even when his handlers explain them to him

Phylo Ignoramus
Ok, Phylo. Forget that we all actually know who let slip Valerie Plame's identity as a spy. The reporter actually backed up the facts near his death. I won't tell you, but since you love Wikipedia so much, why don't you take a look there.

Good point Mr. Gerson
I grant your point that writing allows one to be more precise in their thought process. Allow you make a good point in stating that a stray word can be deadly to a politician.

However, left unstated a glaring problem with the President's use of the teleprompter. That being the fear that the words on the teleprompter are not Obama's. That we're hearing someone else's thoughts while Obama is simply the puppet being used to convey them. As long as many believe this, Obama will have a bit of a credibility problem.

Cactus
The average IQ at Harvard is 160! I was in the class of 94... Being "Old" and "Stupid" does not assure a bright future....

No teleprompter
Off the top of my head!!!!!

"We must invest in education! Our destiny is tied to our children and when we invest in their education we will all see a brighter future for this great country. We cannot and we will not let our children fall behind in the race for academic excellence. Investment in youth developement must be this nation's highest priority!"

Rough translation into real English. Those SOB's in the teacher's unions are my biggest supporters and if the absolute BS that higher pay for teachers equals better education then I will spout this crap to my dying day!

"Clean energy is the only answer to the climate crisis facing our world. My plan for energy independence will create 3,000,000 new jobs and will insure that our children and grandchildren will inherit a planet that can support human habitation. There can be no more debate on the fundamental issue that without clean energy we all face a future in which human life itself is in peril. My opponents offer no plan and no hope but my plan offers clean renewable energy. This basic change is something upon which our children's lives may depend."

Translation: Those ecoloons/greens are another of my biggest backers and if this is what they want me to parrot so be it. Don't confuse me with any facts about nuclear power, the planet actually cooling over the past decade, clean coal, drilling in ANWAR or off shore etc. When I've made up my little mind I don't change it.

The Teleprompter-In-Chief
We all know Obama needs his crutch to make a speech. We have seen him trying to articulate a few sentences without his prop.Um,er,ah,etc.

We know all this but what we don't know is why. I think he needs the prop because it is giving him a message someone else wrote.

I have said many times he is a salesman ,a frontman,if you will. This plot to overthrow the government was hatched long ago and it has slowly been perfected.

It was convenient for Bush to ask congress to give Paulson money for the bailout. That way,both administrations would be complicit in the overthrow. How many times have we heard Obama say he 'inherited this mess'?

The congress over the years brought this on themselves by interferring with the monetary system,businesses and Wall Street. We, who kept electing incompetent people share that blame and we will share the pain that follows.

Phylo: evil or a dupe? Hmmm...

Phylo: “I understand that you would let AIG fail. I don't think you've fully considered the ramifications of that choice. It would be a disaster. It might even lead to a total collapse of our financial system. You're prepared to accept that?”

Re-read the question posed by the reporter in the example you cited earlier: “why do you think the public should sign on for another new sweeping authority for the government to take over companies, essentially?”

“SWEEPING AUTHORITY FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OVER COMPANIES”

Mull that over for a second, Phylo. Now go back and read Obama’s response. Notice how he did not deny or in any way try to back away from the premise of her question.

So in response to your comment above, I say the following:

I understand that you would allow a leftist government to take power from the people and put it in the hands of politicians. I don't think you've fully considered the ramifications of that choice. It would be a worse than a disaster, it would be a tragedy and a catastrophe. It might even lead to a total collapse of our financial and political system. You're prepared to accept that.

killer the clown
since flap ears applied as an affirmative action candidate exactly why should we believe he could have gain acceptance on his under graduate record which no one has yet to see,

But Iq is no indication of actual intelligence. But as you readily approve you lack the ability to understand the issues as well.

Kerry and swimmer kennedy are also harvard graduates and they aren't examples of having much intelligence either.

But like all the trolls and idiots who defend flap ears you have yet to make the case the fool knows what he is doing.

But we heard you cry baby lefties wail when bush had a $200 billion deficit and yet you are quiet when flap ears and his fellow dims will run a $2 trillion deficit this year alone.

But like the dims you hate this country to the extent you will condemn those just starting out in life with massive debt and a bleak future.

So I guess like flap ears you are another loser from harvard clueless over the economy and his reckless spending

Phylo
So what is your point? Many people on both the left and right have become as you put it blinded by their love for Obama. I would put it simply they have been deceived with his lies, and his teleprompter is what is helping to accomplish his plan to deceive the American people.

Obama is nothing more than a puppet. Soro and other billionaires brought the presidency for him. They said we will buy you the presidency but you will follow our direction and do this and that. The teleprompter is a tool given to him so he can convey their message. Obama is lying every time he opens his mouth. He has managed to deceive many people.

The teleprompter is fast becoming something to make fun of Obama, However, we are in serious times, and so much stuff is happening behind the scenes and many are not paying attention. I believe Obama is a dictator. You look back in history 70 years ago (Weimar Republic) where Europe was on the verge of an economic collapse. A dictator named Hitler rose to power. He deceived the people by leading them to believe he was their only solution. Fast forward to day, I believe Obama will run the economy into the ground and bankrupt it, and claim he has a solution and people will not I am certain see any other choice but to believe him.

I am certain you are not aware of this.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Expanded-Americor ps-has-an-authoritarian-feel-41889742.html

Wake up America. You will under Obama one day not be able to leave your street without showing your papers to the brown shirts at the end of your block.

The accidental teleprompter president!
What the public doesn't seem to completely comprehend, and the MSM won’t point out, is each time Obama talks about the economy he reveals that he doesn't have a basic understanding of economic principles. If our national economy is $15 trillion, and, Obama runs up national deficits of $9 trillion, and the interest to service the debt is $1 trillion, how is the country going to balance the budget?

Obama's entire economic policies are based on an illogical assumption. Obama’s illogical assumptions reveal he has been around and influenced by socialist and he has accepted the socialist economic dogma without "logically reasoning" the dogma out in his mind. Obama, in his crazy mind, thinks that his economic policies (universal health care, green energy based on cap-and-trade, and universal college) will end all future economic cycles of expansion, recession, leading to expansion.

Recessions,"cull the herd" creating opportunities that position economies to experience the boom, the expansion stage of the cycle.

Obama thinks by massive spending he can cause government to end economic cycles! Obama doesn't understand the only way to achieve this is to kill the economy! In the nature world all things go through cycles! This process is called “entropy.” Recessions are the entropic phase. Booms are the negative entropic phase of the economic cycle. Obama states over and over, "...no longer can we allow Wall Street wrongdoers…No longer can we allow special interests to put their thumbs on the economic scales…that leads only to disruptive cycles of bubble and bust....It is time to set a new course for this economy, and that change must begin now..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/08/obama.conference.tra nscript/

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/obama-will-not-accept-ec onomic-cycle

http://dallas.craigslist.org/ftw/rnr/1072469468.html

killer 2
so you claim that thew average iq of harvard is 160. That rate occurs in in less than 1 100th of 1 percent of the population. Or roughly 1 in every 11,000 people.

It seems like the grade inflation that harvard has been criticised for is likewise inflating the iq of it's student body.

Your contention is that the average student at harvard qualifies as genius. I don't think so

Ken and CW
Ken, you need professional help.

CW, you are a conspiracy theorist like Ken. Take off the tinfoil hat and start getting your information from people other than the far right loons on the internet.

How many
of us have sat in pews listening to a Pastor/Priest drone on and on from a prepared sermon? Some cases they aren't even their own but handed down through the denomination, in fact I believe the Rick Warrend Purpose Driven Church Growth offers such sermons to Pastors dumb enough to subscribe to them. I mean after about 15 minutes of those sermons I am crosseyed and bored. Whereas, when I have been in meetings where the Preacher is speaking
using just notes or just speaking from their hearts..I am not bored, I am engaged and attentive and
have listened to great preachers sermons for longer than the usual 20-45 minute ones. In these instances the preacher is relying on the Holy Spirit to guide him.
And it was the same when Renaldo Magnus gave a speech, it was from his heart, his core values
so that we hung on his every word..no so with this puppet. I am crosseyed and bored BEFORE he opens his mouth to "preach" his own prewritten by someone else's speech.
As much as I cannot stand to see or hear him, I feel sorry for him, "what does it profit a man
to gain the whole world, and lose his own soul"
He has about the emptiest eyes of any person I've ever seen.

phylo
In response to other questions: I see no problem with Bush’s exchange with the media woman. The media badgered him all the time. He knew this; he did not let it bother him. He had a good sense of humor, and he could give back as good as he got when he wanted too. This was tame, I rather enjoyed when he toyed with the media.

Ambassador Joe Wilson exposed his wife himself.

You can call me what you want. However, the writing is on the wall. I am paying attention to what is going on behind the scenes.

You can continue to bury your head in the sand and worship Obama, as for me I am not fooled by him, I am staying locked, cocked and ready to rock!

I disagree
The continual use of a teleprompter to me means that Obama, and anyone else, isn't speaking from the heart... he/she is just reading what someone wrote for them. I find this unsettling to say the least. Cue cards are fine, but simply reading a speech shows incompetence.

I find it hilarious watching
Republicans and conservatives flail around trying to be outraged and, at the same time, try to distance themselves from the failures of the last 8 years.

Is that the best you have?

"Obama uses a teleprompter"

You guys are getting pwned by Phylo. It's kinda hard to argue when someone simply lists the facts.

pop ya colla
so the black victi9m who thinks he is being hip with his ghetto name makes another appearance to defend his black messiah.

Listen fool return to you middling job at the warehouse and leave the serious thinking to the people who understand that flap ears coming deficit of $10 trillion is a disaster for the country.

Since you are one of those at the lower end of economic strata what do you care about the coming tax increases and the hyper inlation that will result when flap ears can't borrow more from the muzzies or the chicons and starts running the printing press at the fed 24/7

But even worse you are just another loser who hates his children that much that he would rather support your messiah and his irresponsible spending and not care that he is condemning children and grand children to a very bleak future with fewer opportunities and higher taxes.

But then why would someone like you worry. You came from the ranks of the welfare parasites, it won't be hard for you to go back

But it seems when pop looks in the mirror, he looks at an idiot and says, hi fool

pop ya colla 2
plus it is a total moron that talks about himself in the third person.

But like your messiah you have delusions about your limited mentality.

It is obvious you are just as clueless concerning basic economics. But like all brainless trolls you parrot the talking points your handlers give you about bush because you lack the mental acumen to think for your self.

The naacp, the race hustlers all tell you whites are racists and the cause of all black misery and you stupidly believe it

Likewise your masters tell you buish was evil and you fully buy into it. But now think that flap ears is going to provide miracles and make you feel good about yourself and raise your pitiful self esteem.

To the genuine crackhead
First, you might think he's a messiah, but I don't. So you can sling all the 5th grade name-calling you can. It doesn't bother me one bit. I truly understand why you're upset. I'd be mad if I was anchored to an outdated, useless, narrow-minded ideology as well. Now, let me put you in check, real quick *cracking knuckles*

That "middling job" I have, pays my mortgage and feeds my family. Im blessed to have it. As opposed to others who have fallen victim to "trickle-down economics" and other dumb conservative policies. As far as my concern for the economy, I proudly make 40,000 a year at my job and because of Obama, voted for the 1st time in my life this year....The first of MANY TIMES TO COME...Like sooooooooooo many people like me. So suck on that.

I won't even dignify your comment about my children with a reply because it warrants none and I hate to tell you....but the #1 consumer of welfare in the United States are caucasians. Specifically, rural middle-aged white men. *probably like yourself*

But I understand your anger, truely. You see, im 29 years old, and am a supervisor at my "middling warehouse job." I tell old white men like you what to do, ALL DAY, EVERY DAY. Trust me, i see it in their eyes that it kills them to have to do what I say when Im young enough to be their son. In that same way, you hate for Obama. It's OK. You can't expect to when a verbal gunfight when I have a gun and you have a knife.

Ken
You really think you know what's going on behind the scenes Ken?

Really?

You've got it all figured out, do ya? The rest of us are just dupes.

Tell me, how did you come by your special powers of perception, Ken?

Is it a gift from God? Do you have special magic decoder ring?

hail to the chief
Great response #2. The Messiah is so shallow and out of touch with America it is pathetic. He sounds like he came out Lee Strasbergs acting school using the method style. He is fake,boring, and totally in love with himself. this phony has not accomplished one thing on his own, and he still needs his machine behind him. He is President in name only, and his controlled by,Ram Emanuel, Frank, Reid, and Pelosi. The four stooges. The Chicago machine has moved to D.C., and the puppet is Obama.

PopYaCola
Can you believe these nut jobs?

How is it possible to be that frickin clueless?

Most of them seem to think that Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are more reliable sources of news than the New York Times and The Washington Post.

Absolutely amazing. Stunning beyond belief.

What does Harvard
Have to do with public speaking? Harvard frequently admits students that can't formulate intelligent sentences. See many of their gradutates for evidence.