Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, March 26, 2007
Michael Barone :: Townhall.com Columnist
Gore's Faith Is Bad Science
by Michael Barone
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Al Gore likes to present himself as a tribune of science, warning the world of imminent danger. But he is more like an Old Testament prophet, calling on us to bewail our wrongful conduct and to go and sin no more.

He starts off with the science. The world's climate, he reports, is getting warmer. This accurate report is, however, not set in historic context. World climate has grown warmer and cooler at various times in history. Climate change is not some unique historic event. It is the way the world works.

Not this time, Gore says. What's different is that climate change is being driven by human activity -- to wit, increasing carbon dioxide emissions. Which means, he says, that we have to sharply reduce those emissions. But what the scientists tell us is that some proportion of climate change is caused by human activity and some proportion by natural causes -- and that they can only estimate what those proportions are. The estimates they have produced have varied sharply. The climate change models that have been developed don't account for events of the recent past, much less predict with precision events in the future.

To which the prophet replies, with religious intensity, that all debate should be over. Those scientists with inconvenient views should be defunded and silenced. We should replace scientific inquiry with faith. We should have faith that climate change -- "global warming" -- is caused primarily by human activity. And we should have faith that the effects will be catastrophic, with rising oceans flooding great cities and pleasant plains and forests broiled by a searing sun.

Even The New York Times bridles at this. After Gore won the Academy Award for his film on climate change, the Times printed an article in which respected scientists -- not Republicans, not on oil company payrolls -- charged that Gore has vastly exaggerated the likelihood of catastrophic effects.

When you read the fine print of even the scientific reports that Gore likes to cite, you find the same thing. Gore foresees a 20-foot rise in sea level -- 240 inches. The IPCC panel report foresees a maximum of 23 inches. Gore says that "our civilization has never experienced any environmental shift remotely similar to this." Geologist Don Easterbrook says there have been shifts up to "20 times greater than the warming in the past century."

Science says that we should learn more about possible bad effects of climate change and calculate rationally how we can mitigate them. As the economic journalist Robert Samuelson points out, there is little that we can feasibly do in the short term to reduce carbon emissions, though over the long term we may be able to develop substitutes for carbon fuels. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Michael Barone is a senior writer with U.S. News & World Report and the principal co-author of The Almanac of American Politics, published by National Journal every two years. He is also author of Our Country: The Shaping of America from Roosevelt to Reagan, The New Americans: How the Melting Pot Can Work Again, the just-released Hard America, Soft America: Competition vs. Coddling and the Competition for the Nation's Future.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to receive Michael Barone's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Wanda gag
“If we turn a scientific investigation into a theological argument the science doesn't matter any more and nobody wins.”


If we turn to science only, it seems the only real winners are the bureaucrats. (well right, I cannot say that does not matter) Here is an idea: lets put a “hindcasting” model of bureaucracy in and crank it up to warp speed, sort of give it the scientific test. (it might make a better thesis for “evolution” of bureaucracy.)

How Hot is It?
Since the temps. in the Arctic range from -40 below to -100 below, how much do they have to rise in order for all the ice to melt? And the tilt of the earth would have to drastically change in order for enough sunlight to raise the temps to that degree. There are so many aspects of the theory that just doesn't pass the logic test. Just what does an "average global temp" have to do with anything?? It's warm, cold, hot, mild in different places all over. If you heat up a board to 212 degrees on one end at cool it down to 32 degrees on the other, you average 122 degrees. Does that tell you anything about what's actually happening on the board?? So, the average temp went up .6C over a century, a lot of assumptions have to be made. One being that it is accurate. Does anyone doubt that temp measuring has improved greatly over the past century? Where were the temps taken? There are only about 100 weather stations in all of Antarctic, a area the size of Mexico and U.S. together. There can be NO accurate measurement of temps and you certainly can't say that temps are increasing.

They stated that Greenland temps had increased by 11 degrees. It was only on a small portion of Greenland where that temp was measured, YET they stated it as the entirity of Greenland. Their theories are full of statements of half-truths, outright lies, and distortions.

AGW'ers will say that one season or one month of above or below average temps mean nothing, but in the same sentence will point out how Jan. was really hot and ignore the fact that Feb. was one of the 5 coldest on record. They also point to hot summers and hot winters to back their theory, but when YOU point out how certain seasons or months were either normal or very cold, they flippinly point out that it "means nothing". That is simpily "weather", not "climate." There's no sense in arguing with a closed minded socialist!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.