Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Mel Martinez :: Townhall.com Columnist
No more partisanship: The Protect America Act should be reauthorized
by Mel Martinez
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


There is no higher responsibility for anyone elected to federal office than keeping Americans safe from foreign attack. We have a variety of tools for doing so, from our brave men and women in our Armed Forces, to our diplomatic corps, to our intelligence services.

Of all the people who spend their days and nights working to keep us safe, none are as important as those who collect and analyze intelligence about our enemies. No weapon in war is more powerful than information. And that is why the upcoming reauthorization of the Protect America Act might be one of the most important congressional debates we undertake this year.

Here’s where we stand today. The Protect America Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by the President just a few months ago. It was designed to modernize how our intelligence agencies collect and share vital data in an era when our enemies are as likely to communicate via email or cell phones as they are to meet in person. The provisions of the act allow for American intelligence services to monitor electronic communications coming in or out of the United States without having to wait for a court order. In other words, if al Qaeda is calling a sleeper cell in our country, the Protect America Act makes sure our government can monitor that call without any undue roadblocks. The Act sets very specific procedures for such surveillance, and ensures the independent intelligence court system is kept fully apprised. In other words, it was carefully written to give the men and women in our intelligence community the tools they need to keep us safe while still protecting the civil liberties that keep us free.

Throughout the history of our republic we have always been concerned about the proper balance between security and freedom. Those who are generally concerned about the power of government to trample on the rights of free citizens when necessity dictates are right to insist on maintaining the individual civil liberties afforded by our Constitution, most especially in times of crisis. The Protect America Act now being contemplated by the US Congress is precisely concerned with maintaining such protections. Indeed, this Act is simply a modern update to more effectively implement the goals of the original FISA law as passed in 1978.

Unfortunately, Democrats in Congress decided that the provisions of the Protect America Act should only be temporary. Right now, they are set to expire in February, and the bill that Democrats are proposing to replace them is inadequate. It will severely weaken the ability of our government to perform its most critical duty: keeping Americans safe in our daily lives.

The safety of the American people cannot be a partisan, political issue. Members of Congress must come together to present the President with a bill he can sign: a bill that will let us sleep more soundly at night, knowing we maintain the vital tools to defend ourselves against a ruthless enemy intent on killing Americans. We must come together to create a bill that equips our intelligence community with the tools it needs to protect our citizens.

The obvious starting place for any legislation to keep us safe is the bill passed last August. Democrats were willing to vote for it then. But now, they are changing their minds as the liberal elements of their party begin to make noise. They’ve decided that the provisions passed in August – provisions that are working right now to keep us safe – are too tough. But how tough on the terrorists is too tough? As long as we protect our own civil liberties – and the bill passed in August bends over backwards to do exactly that – then why soften it? Why create more loopholes that will put roadblocks in the way of our intelligence services as they work to protect us? We need a permanent solution that will ensure that the men and women working to keep us safe are given every advantage we can offer in fighting a brutal enemy.

Of course, protecting the civil liberties of American citizens is also important to all of us. We must work together to find a balance that guarantees our rights and freedoms without engaging in a suicide pact that unnecessarily allows our enemies to take open advantage of our free society. We must not allow the terrorists outside our country to benefit from the rights and liberties Americans fight for and celebrate. We have placed freedom as the cornerstone of our way of life, but to extend the protection of our constitutional liberties to foreign terrorists who seek our destruction is grossly unwarranted and unwise if we are to be successful in combating international terrorism.

We have made significant progress in securing our homeland since September 11, and we have learned valuable lessons about the enemy along the way. Now we must strengthen our ability to perform the most essential duty of governance, and to protect ourselves from those who seek to do us harm. Reauthorizing the Protect America Act instead of watering it down is the right way to do that.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

“Mel” Martinez is Florida’s thirty-third United States Senator and is the first Cuban-American to serve in the U.S. Senate.

Be the first to read Senator Martinez's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Martinez
By the way, Martinez, 86% of Republicans and 72% of Democrats opposing amnesty for illegal alien invaders/criminals is about as non-partisan as it gets.

You and your globalist friends seem to be the only ones who don't "get it". I can think of three excuses for that right off the top of my head:
A. You and they can't comprehend the definitions of 'criminal' and 'law'. How stupid would that be?
B. You and they think that we in the general public are too stupid to comprehend those definitions. How arrogant and stupid would that be?
C. You and your friends don't care what the definitions are because you have an agenda to destroy the Constitution of the United States (which would eliminate all U.S. laws) and replace it with a 'Commission' to govern all of the North American continent - Canada, the U.S., and Mexico.

I think it's "C".

Not goners yet!
We're not goners yet! In fact, we have a good opportunity to both take our government back and put the globalists in their place. What we have to do is to go to the polls and VOTE in the Primary elections. Ignore Guiliani, Thompson, McCain, and Romney and vote for Hunter, Paul, or Tancredo. When one of our candidates is selected, instead of one of the globalists', they will get the message.

They DO listen to us when we YELL LOUD ENOUGH! They heard us when we yelled loudly about the Scamnesty Act (oops, I mean the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007). We flooded them with emails and faxes, and CRASHED the capitol telephone system. We can do it again any time we try.

The immigration problem is a big one, but it isn't the biggest. The biggest problem is NAFTA. I think it's not a treaty (possibly not ratified by the Senate), but just legislation like all other laws. If I'm correct, then all we have to do is get the legislation repealed. Dump NAFTA and most of our other problems go with it. The illegal alien problem, the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC), the NAFTA Superhighway... each is based on NAFTA. Also, if the NAFTA is just legislation, the repeal can be initiated in the House of Representatives where we have a lot more influence. The coming Primary and General elections gives us more influence, too. Now's the time to mount an aggressive campaign in the House and Senate!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.