Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Matt Towery :: Townhall.com Columnist
"Frost/Nixon" Deserves Academy Award for Best Picture: From a Man Who "Interviewed" Richard Nixon
by Matt Towery
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Hollywood tilts toward mega-action films with plenty of special effects but little in the way of special entertainment. That changes with the brilliant "Frost/Nixon." Director Ron Howard brings together a flawless cast with a team of exceptional writers to present us with a rare contemporary cinematic jewel.

And I feel somewhat qualified myself to comment on the essence of the film, given an almost "Forrest Gump-like" encounter I had with former President Richard Nixon.

Howard's film takes some creative license with history, but presents a compelling story of how British talk show interviewer David Frost -- a stateside media pop star in the '60s and '70s -- managed to bag a startling post-resignation interview with Nixon.

Frost is portrayed as a playboy whose career has hit the skids. He decides to revive it by raising the money to produce hours of interviews with Nixon and breaking new ground by selling the interviews through syndication.

Those who have read advanced copies of my new book, "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of The 2008 Fight For The Presidency," will recall my coincidental encounter with Richard Nixon in 1983. The essence of that chance encounter explains much about Nixon, including the Nixon portrayed in the new movie.

In it, Frost conducts hours of mostly benign interviews with Nixon, who appears to charm Frost and to cast himself as highly likeable. Even Frost's own production team felt that the interviewer known for glib chitchat wasn't up to parry-and-thrust sessions with the likes of Nixon.

I won't give away the plot, but allow me to recount a critical scene. An inebriated Nixon phones Frost at his hotel room and starts rambling about what it is like to be "an outsider" and how, even in the ongoing interviews, either Nixon or Frost will "win." He basically challenges Frost to take him on.

The burr under Nixon's saddle is his deep-seated notion that anyone who isn't from an "aristocratic" background -- be it British or American -- necessarily must feel resentment towards their "betters," and probably have been treated badly by them.

Having researched Frost, Nixon asks him how badly he was treated as the son of a minister studying among the gentry at Cambridge. He picks at Frost, trying to see if he, too, shares the resentment for the so-called "elite" that haunted Nixon. Frost doesn't bite.

Fast-forward to real-life. It was 1983. I had worked as an aide to a Republican U.S. senator, but was completing my degrees at David Frost's same Cambridge University. Back in the United States on holiday, I was at a well-known private establishment when a group of prominent Republican fundraisers spotted me and insisted that they had "Dick Nixon" with them in the next room. I thought they were joking, but instead, as they opened the door, there he stood, larger than life.

They told Nixon that I had worked in the Senate, but was now at Cambridge, studying toward an advanced degree in International Relations.

Nixon didn't miss a beat. First the charm: "Most Americans think Oxford is the best but all the smart guys go to Cambridge." As with Frost, Nixon had charmed me in a flash. But in the course of our chat -- Nixon clearly enjoyed talking international relations -- he asked me an odd question in a newly sincere tone: "Are they treating you OK there?"

I guess with my Southern accent and lack of sophistication, he assumed that I, too, was a victim of highbred elitism.

Ironically, just like David Frost in the movie, my response shocked him. I felt totally at ease with the university and my many friends. Nixon shrugged off the subject and proceeded to allow me to question him for my dissertation. I had lucked out.

And therein lies the essence of this stellar film. Richard Nixon could be both a charmer and his own worst enemy. In displaying his insecurities about a real or imagined world of "elites," he was an early embodiment of the "Paranoid Nation" I describe in my book.

I guess the only difference between most people he met and me was that I still admired much of what the man had achieved and I appreciated that he tried so hard to be loved.

Take the time to see "Frost/Nixon." It will be as special as a chance encounter with the man would have been; and it will bring him to life far better than my meager words can alone.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Matt Towery is a former National Republican legislator of the year and author of Powerchicks: How Women Will Dominate America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Matt Towery's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Roadmaster is Right (and also correct)
At the National Geographic initial showing, Howard made remarks regarding George Bush 43's (in his view) criminal behavior equaling Richard Nixon's. His comments were so egregious that Chris Wallace felt compelled to stand up and defend George Bush.

There is no way I'm spending my hard-earned money to put a penny in Howard's pocket.

Nixon who?
Today's "youth" under forty have no recollection of Nixon He did not exist except for his 'library' in Yorba Linda CA.

Why Howard would invest and do this film is beyond any fiscal reasoning. I admit I have not seen any of the film except for a few seconds of movie ad's and trailers.

It is boring to anyone other than a political geek. You want the evidence? This is Reply #8. I think Ann Coulter is up to #438 at this same moment after publication of today's TH.

Awards
The only way this movie will win an award is if Howard makes Nixon out to be criminal-like.That is Hollywood.

Since Howard fell under Obama's swoon,I doubt he will be fair with his movie.We will see.

Coincidence?
The left viewed Nixon with "Fear & Loathing." He won two POTUS terms.

The left viewed Reagan with "Fear & Loathing." He won two POTUS terms.

The left views GWB with "Fear & Loathing." He won two POTUS terms.

Alone of all non-GWB GOP politicos, the left views Sarah Palin with "Fear & Loathing."

Whom should we be already pressing for in 2012?

Don't freak out everyone!
Just click on the link to Michele as a columnist and click on her archives link. You will find the entire text of the UAW column she recently posted there. There is no commie plot underway at TH.com

How about Matt's column?
Interesting, but having placed Ron Howard solidly in the category of loony, lefty Hollyweirds, I don't force them to take any of my hard earned, hated conservative money. Opie seems like a really nice guy, but he's been immersed in the biz for so long, he's only slightly less disgusting than Mikey Moore or those total idiots, Redford, Penn or Streisand.

Excellent column
Michelle's column for today is 5 star, but I can't find it on TH.

WAKE UP !
IGNORE THIS AT YOUR PERIL !


Please Wake up people !

Michelle malkin's column was pulled from the TownHall postings last night!

JANUARY 1, 2009, TownHall Became Pravda. Now all your news and comments will come from Pravda or Tass.

"OFFICIAL NEWS IS OK, ANYTHING ELSE WILL NOT BE PRINTED."

I know, no one will notice the difference at first. Wait a few weeks.

~~~~

WHY?

It is obvious that her opinion pi$$ed off the UAW, and the Democrats.


Who is next?

If you care about reading opinions from Conservatives, you should be outraged !


Don't care about Malkin?

Who do you care about?

TownHall has already become softer in the last 2-3 years. Who is next?

Your favorite columnist may be the next to go.

I can tell you, from many years of observation, that all conservatives are in the center of the Bullseye.

Dodge or duck, or verbally shoot back. Lest ye die.


Does anyone out there care ?

~~~

It is my Opinion that TownHall is starting to act like PRAVDA.

They censor conservative voices, and allow any tripe except a few curse words, in order to seem fair.

Only about a dozen Columnists here are true conservatives, and the rest are RINOs.

TownHall is morphing into a left-wing site.

Does anyone else besides me care?




Who Would Think ?




~~~


Really Curious !

"PRAVDA TH" JUST PULLED THE MICHELLE MALKIN COLUMN FROM THEIR SCREEN.

The last post I saw was :

@ Reply # 275
Date: Jan 1, 2009 - 12:28 AM EST ...

~~~


My last post was :

~~~~
Is it just my screen?

The fine Michelle Malkin Column is no longer shown on my screen with the Photo, and the other options.

Her column is NOW, shown ONLY at the top of my screen where only the Name of the author, and title of the article are shown.

Hmm?

~~~

Hey, Michelle! YOU ARE DIRECTLY OVER THE TARGET !

Please drop your full load of Bombs!

You have a BIG following here at the, more and more, leftist, PC adherent, and just irrelevant 'Town House' site.

~~~

GEEZE ! Town Hall !

WHY? WHY Are the commie posters are treated with more respect than many of our best Columnists and posters ?

~~~
I did celebrate the 'New Year' with celebratory noise.

I lifted my left Cheek and gave all the commie trolls a kiss of a vaporous combination of Methane, CO2 and other emanations, to revile the senses.

And, Pravda TH, here is another, just for you ! OK, Just One More... !@#$%^&*() DANM ! Now I have to go wipe on TH er TP.

~~~

OK, I may be banned forever, from 'PRAVDA TH', but I have to say this !

If the UAW has now become more powerful than the Ist Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States, this Once Fine Country is already dead!


TownHall AKA 'Pravda TH' has just pulled Michelle Malkin's column from their screen!

Why? Because she dared to criticize the UAW !

I have worked under the thumb of the UAW for 43 three years, and I can tell you, She is 100% correct on every account! Yes! I can tell you stories if you want them!
email @
rattusamericansis@yahoo,com

I can also tell you, she understated their vile doings in every one of her comments!

Doubt it? I can tell you stories, but if I had any condemning PROOF, I would not still be alive.


Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.