Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, July 10, 2008
Matt Towery :: Townhall.com Columnist
Let McCain be McCain
by Matt Towery
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


I saw this one coming a mile away. Slowly but surely, the crew that battled and outsmarted the GOP establishment to propel John McCain to the Republican presidential nomination is being shoved aside and replaced by old-hand Bush-Cheney political operatives. Oh, happy days for McCain.

It's all about money. Up until the changes in staff that put longtime Bush folks in charge, the "establishment" side of the GOP -- those who backed former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, for example -- have been sitting on their wallets. They've been playing coy about whether and how much they would support McCain.

Trust me. The deal has been cut. Those who danced with McCain -- those who "brung him here" -- are playing secondary roles. And that makes me all the surer that no matter how many speeches Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty gives, or how many women Florida's Gov. Charlie Crist proposes to, Mitt Romney will be McCain's running mate, whether McCain likes it nor not.

Here's the big problem that no one wants to confront: The Republican electorate didn't vote for Mitt or Rudy Giuliani or the rest of the GOP field in the primaries because they are just plain tired of the same warmed-over GOP robots. They wanted someone who could appeal to moderates and mavericks. They wanted a sharp-tongued, quick-witted, no-games-playing nominee. They wanted John McCain.

The problem for McCain was that no one in the GOP establishment, as it has been reshaped and maintained by the Bush administration, wanted McCain. He beat them at their own game.

Their retribution is to withhold their full support from him and to make him tap dance for money. Some of them have pondered whether to just let him sink beneath the waves, as a way to clear the decks for a candidate more to their liking four years from now.

They want to rein in McCain, to bring "order" to his campaign. As Dr. Evil of the "Austin Powers" comedy films would say ever so slowly, "Right."

Who among this group or Republican elites came up with the brilliant idea of sending McCain to Mexico on the Fourth of July? Is this really in the candidate's best interest?

Who has him suddenly dropping the sharp rhetorical edge he used to display so brazenly, trading in it in for a more buttoned-down approach, as if he were someone's retired uncle?

These campaign engineers want McCain's famed "Straight Talk Express" to run on time. The question is, where is it headed?

I could tell the same old crowd had taken over when our firm released a poll showing Barack Obama seriously challenging McCain in the usually reliable GOP state of Georgia. Rather than admit that this one Southern state might be a concern because of its huge African-American vote, huge voter base of young people, and its own former GOP congressman running as the Libertarian candidate, Team McCain trotted out two Georgia U.S. senators to say that McCain had a 10-point lead in the Peach State, so not to worry.

Now that makes a lot of sense, doesn't it? Rather than use the potential tightness of a race to energize your base, you instead try to convince your voters that there is no reason to put up signs, donate money or try a little harder. That's the team I've known from the past: too proud and self-satisfied to bend their strategy to take advantage of reality.

The GOP had better wake up and realize that the best thing it has going in the McCain campaign is McCain himself. Try to turn him into George W. Bush, and he will lose in a landslide. Try to "choreograph" his statements and control his personality, and it will be the inside-job political assassination of Bob Dole in 1996 all over again.

John McCain doesn't have a lot of true friends in the GOP. South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is one of the few. My advice to McCain: Let Graham watch your backside. Because if the "new leadership" overseeing the McCain campaign is allowed to body-snatch the real McCain and replace him with a Republican drone, it's going to guarantee even larger Democratic House and Senate majorities next year, and a crushing defeat for McCain himself, who is a much better candidate than any of them seem to recognize.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Matt Towery is a former National Republican legislator of the year and author of Powerchicks: How Women Will Dominate America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Matt Towery's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
B..........S..........!

A total crock.

The whole primary mechanism was set up to marginalize conservatives and minimize their impact on the process, to grease the skids for McCain or Giuliani, the two candidates who could do the one thing Towery got right in this brain-dead column:

"They wanted someone who could appeal to moderates and mavericks"

They didn't want a conservative, so they threw no support toward Hunter or Tancredo, or even Thompson (once he got off his butt).

We had winner-take-all and open primaries, the kiss of death for real conservatism because of the force multiplier it applies to non-GOP participants in GOP primaries, like unregistered "independants" and Dem crossovers.


Towery's got his head firmly buried on this one. But, of course, no surprise, as he's one of the most flagrant McCain apologists.


Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
The head robot, John McCain and his pet, Lindsey Graham, are leading the GOP to defeat.
His acceptance of global warming and push for illegal amnesty are driving voters away.

We deserve a much better candidate than McCain.

FOLLOW THE RINOS OVER THE CLIFF
John is a RINO leading his party over the cliff. He was nominated because split their votes in the primary as the Republican Establishment hoped they would. For at least 10 years, John McCain has not been a conservative. He thought of becoming a Democrat in 2002 and shold have become one> He votes and talks ilke one. I am almost 55 years old and will be voting for Bob Barr to throw the RINOS over the cliff to prsseve the conservative movement which John McCain is out to destroy. I have voted Republican all of my life, but not for John McCain. The only way I will vote for McCain is if he picks Romney as his VP. CONSEVATISM WINS and John McCain will lose and lose badly because he is not one.

I can't agree with Mr. Towery either.
Why McCain got the Republican 'nod' was not because Republicans wanted a maverick, moderate attracting candidate. Fact is, none of the candidates showed much spunk. Those who seemed qualified failed to follow the golden rule "Thou shalt speak no ill of a fellow conservative." and thus shot one another in the foot until only McCain came limping home with the prize.

Whether it was religious bigotry fired deep into Romney's instep, or Huckabee's foot-in-mouth disease or Thompson's self-inflicted wound because he hates to campaign, only McCain survived.

Had someone actually been a Reagan, believed in Reagan principles, fought a Reagan campaign, and inspired the country in a Reagan like manner, neither McCain, nor Obama, nor Clinton, nor Huckabee, nor Paul, Hunter, Tancredo or any of the candidates in either party would have had a prayer.

But those days are, apparently, gone. So we get McCain who fails to inspire... or Obama, who guarantees the further deterioration of American principle and American life.

Great choice, don't you think?

'Way back before Iowa
the Republicans (or someone) drew up a list of each candidate's programs but without their names and polled a slew of voters. Duncan Hunter won overwhelmingly, and I think McCain was about third of the 8 or 9 running at the time.

The Republican Electorate didn't want a maverick, we wanted a Republican who could beat Hillary or Obama.

There was a terrific, awful cartoon back in April of McCain saying, "I have about as much chance of winning as Bob Dole did." So true.

Romney is campaigning for McCain
BETTER than McCain is. Every time I see him, he's right on target, saying exactly what needs to be said, forcefully, yet ever so politely.

Tonight I saw McCain with Charlie Gibson and when asked if he thinks Obama is a flip-flopper, McCain hesitated and then weakly mumbled, "Oh, I haven't really been paying too much attention, blah, blah, blah."

Gee, what an opportunist! We're in trouble here folks.

I don't think he has any choice at this point but to choose Romney and thank Heaven.

Hi elvis! Hope you are feelin just great!

A Good Idea
Let McCain Be McCain. There is no better way to ensure that the Republicans lose this election if Senator McCain acts like Senator McCain. He has already gotten the Conservatives to not vote for him. Does he think that the Democrat friends that put him over the top in the primaries are going to vote for him in the general election? They may have helped in the primaries, but they will vote the Democrat ticket in the general election. This begins to look like a landslide year for the Democrats.

promises promises
wonder what mccain had ro promise to get that assistance and that money. wonder the same thing about obama though. someone should tell mccain and his crew that winding up as the presumptive candidate for the republican candidate for president carries with it certain responsibilities. . One of these is sticking around. it is not a license to take extended e=rest and recovery time while you opponent is beating you over the head every day. the 75000 attendance
figure for obama might shake aomebody up. mccain should realize that even though all 200 of those who listen to him speak at those fund raisers give money, and monry is important, they still only have 200 votes. . sometime he is going to have to face the crowds that he hopes will show up if they are not busy attending speeches by obama , and the press which he has shown a marked aversion to dealing with . for a man who promised the equivuilent of a press conference a week after he gets elected, he is getting very litle e practice now and he sure can use it.

I agree with Towery.
McCain's advantage is that many Americans see him as a decent man with integrity. AND THEY HAVE KNOWN HIM FOR MANY YEARS. Obama's past indicators of his character, what few there are, include associations with a terrorist, an embzzler, and a hate-monger (for 20 voluntary years). His having moved toward the "base" during the primaries endangers his appeal.
This forum isn't representative. Yahoos here scream "amnesty", despite several non-giveaway hurdles to citizenship in that immigration bill. It's biggest error was its lack of a requirement that the borders be protected first. The mantra here resembles the extremists on the other side who keep saying that McCain wants to keep troops in Iraq for 100 years. The big question is whether both misinterpretations are willful, or just ignorant.

Article is out of touch with GOP voters!
McCain has gotten no money from us this year - we are waiting...The only folks who have received money from us this year are mostly Veterans running for offices in different states. We have been contributing to those folks in other states running a STRONG conservative message. That is the only way the GOP is going to listen to us - hit them in the pocketbook. And I tell them that every time they call for donations! Surprisingly they actually listen to my 2 minute soapbox speech about how we will NO LONGER support a candidate unless they espouse conservative ideals. And I campaigned for McCain when he ran in 2000, and he taught me what a mistake that had been afterwards! And they have been asking if we would support McCain based on who is his VP - yes, we would - if it was Romney or Jhindal, somebody like that. As a woman (who likes being a woman), I desire that the men who are responsible for running this country have a pair of...how do you say "Cahones" (sp? trying to learn spanish in case Obama gets elected, bare with me here....) to stand up for conservative values without apologizing for it!

Oh Robert, don't be sorry...
be afraid. The vast majority of people out there seem to have no problem with socialism (even they are too uneducated to recognize it as such. I for one, love this country, and I will not help it go down (whether quickly by the left or more slowly by the supposed'right'). At least, at the end of the day - I will be able to stand proud - on the very principles that (once) made this country so great! I don't want to be a European....no matter what the left says - go there...heck even EU leaders are telling their citizens to get off their lazy, government hand out butts and work! And I never said McCain wasn't raising money...just not from us. Take a look at where he's getting that money too....telling.

McCain be McCain
Shauna, I for one will not provide any financial aupport to the McCain campaign, nor to the Republican party this year simply because they have detrayed us conservatives. I will vote for McCain since he has pledged (I hope he will honor his pledge) to appoint judges who will interpret the constitution for what is says and not what the Europeans think it should say.
This country is in for some rough times, where is the candidate who will pledge to get us moving in the right direction, for example, the Dems are aginast the trade agreements since they claim that they take American away and ship them overseas. Of course this is nonsense. The union support this. Where is the candidate who will SAY and live by "we need to drill for oil here in the USA, including ANWAR, and develope our indepence from foreign oil". How can we continue to send our valuable resouces (our hard earned cash) to the likes of Chaves and the arabs. Does not make any sense to me.

What a Crock
I saw this one coming a mile away. Slowly but surely, the crew that battled and outsmarted the GOP establishment to propel John McCain to the Republican presidential nomination
__________________________________________

Obviously you can't even see the nose in front of your face.

This idiot has been sliding downhill for a long time but now he has reached Wir status. Too bad we don't have negative ratings.

"Let Graham watch your backside"
Impossible. Graham's nose is far too close to McCain's backside for him to SEE anything.

BrianR has it right (as usual)
Towery got it backwards.

The party "establishment" is the same group of worn out, used up, Rockefeller Republicans who couldn't win Congress away from the Democrats for 40 years; who are embarassed by fundementalist Chrisians and gun owners; who cringe every time a liberal cries "racism" instead of firing back. The "establishment" got the candidate they wanted over the desire of the base.

Here's the crux of the whole discussion. Towery claims that "The Republican electorate didn't vote for Mitt or Rudy Giuliani or the rest of the GOP field in the primaries because they are just plain tired of the same warmed-over GOP robots."

But if the "Republican electorate" got what they wanted the GOP wouldn't have any trouble raising money, would they? Instead we have the RNC (apparently) being revamped to de-emphasize the candidate Towery says the "Republican electorate" wanted. Why? And the the NRSC (who called me yesterday to try to convince me to send them money), and NRCC have already abandoned McCain and are concentrating on the down-ticket to try to regain the majority in the Senate and/or House to combat what they believe will be an Obama Prsidency.

The Rockefeller Republicans got their way, which is the way of defeat (see "Gerald Ford" and George H.W. "no new taxes" Bush for more on this). But they get to keep their own positions of political power, which they care about more than their governing philosophy (which consists of little more than reading polls and getting the MSM to say nice things about them). They are weenie RINO moderates, and apparently so is Towery.

One thing more
I notice that Towery and the other RINOs who got the candidate they wanted don't want to accept the responsibility for that candidate's failures, only his successes.

This is a disgusting liberal characteristic. So they are following the liberal playbook in dealing with it - blame it on Bush. According to liberals Bush was responsible for hurricane Katrina, global warming, no WMD in Iraq, economic suffering by unnamed victims, and every other malady, real or invented, that has occured since Bush announced his candidacy in the Fall of 1999.

Now we have alleged Republicans like Towery blaming Bush because their man, McCain, is despised by the conservative base of the GOP and can't get them to donate to his campaign.

Towery and his ilk need to either up or switch parties.

Let McCain Be McCain (D-Lite)
Let's see him get elected by the illegal aliens he's pandering to. Did anyone tell him that illegal aliens can't vote legally? Oh, that's right, he doesn't understand the word ILLEGAL.

GOP=Whig

The Stupid Party

The RNC wanted an amnesty candidate.

Don't vote for one.

Another amnesty will result in Democrat majorities for decades, or until they are supplanted by the La Raza Party, why doesn't the RNC know that? How stupid do you have to be to import voters for the opposition at the same time you alienate your own voters? Nominating any of the amnesty supporters is a losing proposition, we will not support them. If the GOP intends to surrender our sovereignty and abandon the rule of law, they will find in November 2008, that they still have their big money/cheap labor donors, but they do not have voters. GOP-RIP

Obama Supports Infanticide
This is according to Jill Stanek:

"Barack Obama is so radically pro-abortion he supports infanticide, as evidenced by his active opposition to the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act. This makes him further left than any U.S. senator and even NARAL."

It really doesn't matter what he says this week, Obama voted for infanticide when he opposed the Illinois Born Alive Infants Protection Act. No pro-lifer should be fooled into thinking that Obama has changed his position on abortion in general and late-term abortion specifically. No pro-lifer should vote for Obama.

McCain being McCain
Many americans see McCain as an Angry old man with integrity. I saw how his gang of 14 betrayed the president and how many conservative judges that McCain promise to appoint, how many have been confirmed thanks to McCain?

He's done so much I can't hear his words.

If he had ever lived the promises he's spouting now, I'd consider him. He criticized the administration at every turn, and he happened to be right a couple of times, like on the surge and the war strategy. But did he have to be so vocal and running to the press about it all the time? If congress and other figures attack him the way he undermined Bush he's going to be an angry old man much of the time, if he makes it into the oval office. And if he gets there, it won't be because some 'incumbant protectionist' column tricked me into it.

We've Made Our Bed...
Now we have to sleep in it! Sorry folks, that's the way it is!
Because of the GOP's "want" of a nominee (because the MSM told us that is what we wanted) that had the right flavor of religion, we are left with Mr. Juan "I love La Raza" McShame.
I hear many of you now saying, "I will only vote for McShame if Romney is on the ticket". Where were you before when there were actually some "conservatives" running for office? Where was our support of actual CONSERVATIVE candidates?
Face it, the GOP took it like a hungry sucker...hook, line, and sinker from the liberal media, that we wanted a moderate RINO and that is what we got!
Now we are left with NO choice at all;liberal A (D) or liberal B (R).
Personally, I shall write-in Romneys name or vote for Bob Barr and hope for a better and enlightened GOP in 4 years.

VaPat Right ON!
Yup, I've been saying this since before McShame clinched. See my blog, click the underlined name above.

Towery (how apt) is plain FOS and I don't believe a word he, or his polls, say.

I (bold underlined italic emphasis) have NO desire to move the most tiny step toward the Moronic Mythical Moderate Middle. That's what's brought us to the brink of the Socialist Abyss.
Mac the Knife is the Death of Reaganism. To hell with that.
I've divorced the spouse abusing GOP as represented by Ivory Towery and his Gilt Bird Cabin Conservative Free GOP. Let them appeal to the Roberts of the electorate--I know Socialism Lite when I see it and reject its slower surer poison.

Shoot down Maverick and send him back to the Poliltical Hanoi Hilton where he belongs.

The Big Mick

2 Points ATT Kent
This may be a resend. I think I hit a miskey, either sent it partial or lost it.

Kent, we got lots of choices. Boycott, write in (my choice would be Bobby Jindal after seeing him on Oh?Really?). I'm researching writing in "none of the above". That would be the ideal vote, make all of em do it over with a decent candidate. Ideally we would all agree on a candidate if we were to write in or vote another party so the "to hell with Mac the knife" message would be clear.

Point 2. If IvoryTowery think Mac the yBitchie appeals to moronic mythical "moderates" all he has to do is look at the poster girl for Mods--Old Maid Aunt Mort Con Drak he. He practically wets himself any time a harsh word is used in his hearing.

Note the rating Ivory Towery is getting, TOWNHALL TAKE NOTE! Death to McHo's and their "moderate" Socialism Lite. DEATH! (politically and rhetorically speaking, of course---right.)

the big mick

Kent
Dump you sour grapes.
Romney lost my vote when he told me his Heterodox Mormon Doctrines were none of my damn business. And his supporters lost him my vote when they dogsheite piled on that.

If he'd had the balls to say "Yeah, I know it sounds screwy but that's what I believe with all my heart, it's part of my faith." I could have respected that. The circling of the wagons and iron curtain of secrecy doomed him.

And I don't believe he was really a Reagan Conservative any more than Mac the Knife is. He WAS a flip flopper. He was somewhat more acceptable than Mac the Knife. SOMEwhat.
And he's too damn plastic haired--the GOP John Edwards.

the big mick

BrianR#1
There's the nugget, Brian. The next step after shooting down Maverick. (At all costs, even voting Hussein--see my blog--click underlined name) is to rid the GOP of the "winner take all" ANTI-Conservative structure. Winner take all is for Robber Barons, NOT WF Buckley or RReagan Conservatives. Real Conservatives believe in the FREEDOM of the Market Place of Ideas, NOT MONOPOLY and Stifling (sp?) of Competition like the Robber Baron Establishment Machine Party Bosses (EMPBs).

the big mick

Big Mick
Consider voting for whatever third party candidate is on your ballot. Write-ins are not even tallied in many localities. We need for the RNC to be able to see where their votes went. Libertarian or Constitution Party accomplishes that.

Matt; What a wonderful summation
Of our Parties inner party politics. The very same minds that could not unseat JohnMcCain in the primaries will have their revenge on him and those of us who have support him from the start.
Leave McCain to run his campiagn correctly and distance himself from the millstone that Bush/Cheney's administration has done to us.
I fault Cheney more than the gaulable George W. on how the disasters of Iraq and everything that followed happened. It was his shifty greed for power, oil and money that drove us into that war not one thing more. Chasing Osama Bin Lauden was not proffitable to him, Haliberton or his buddies. But he did not pay for ite CnC, his CS, State and DOD all paid while he shoots govenors hunting.
Let McCain and his team win in November, just put the cash there for us and WIN another 8 years in the WH.

You're Right
You're absolutely correct -- none of the GOP base voted for Romney or Guilliani. Romney couldn't spend enough to make himself attractive to the GOP BASE.

BUT THEY DID VOTE FOR HUCKABEE!!!

McCain's only hope is to select Mike Huckabee to be his VP. If he chooses Romney or another RINO he's sunk!


We wanted this guy?!
I wanted Thompson or Romney as a fall back candidate, I never wanted McCain! I do not understand how Matt Towery could be so wrong about what the GOP voters wanted...and as has been stated elsewhere, if we wanted him so badly why is he so far back in fundraising? I don't think that a candidate like Thompson or Romney would be out there having to dance for their supper like McCain does, because the base would willingly support those people.

As for McCain's fixation on his honor, that's all fine and good...but it doesn't win any elections. Elections are won not on your personal honor but on your ideas, ideals, and ideology. Heck, Barack Obama is fithful to hois wife and loves his kids, but that doesn't mean he's fit to be President. And judt because McCain stood tall in captivity doesn't mean that he is the best choice for the presidency either. And if you want to see what relying on personal honor gets you politically check this link out: http://spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13489


Dumb article
Let McCain be McCain? Are you nuts? He’d be a Democrat. If he had been himself he wouldn't be the Republican presumptive nominee. It's apparent no one really likes McCain, whether he behaves "liberal," or tries to pass himself off as a "Republican." Does anyone higher up in the GOP ever read the negative comments after a McCain story?

Mr. Towery made one good point. Why was McCain in Mexico on American Independence Day? Perhaps, Cinco de Mayo might have been a better time for him to go, considering McCain's politics.

It's sad watching news clips of McCain failing to seize opportunities to demolish Obama's candidacy. Maybe, McCain should direct the same kind of nasty, critical rhetoric he uses on Republicans against Obama. He might inspire a few conservatives to vote for him and maybe even throw a few bucks his way.


We'll see the VP any day now


Towery's dreaming if he expects Romney to return on the GOP ticket.

In fact; he makes the case against Romney by bluntly saying the money-changers were all behind McCain's delegate victories.

They furnished little if any of Romney's primary expenses. It's public knowledge he spent a sizeable fortune of his own, getting hardly anything accomplished.

Now this pundit declares they're giving Romney the tap for Vice-president? But they owe him nothing!

Wishful thinking is permitted in election campaigns. But McCain intends to win. Not along those lines, however. He'll call upon a smart and electable young Republican who'll unite the Party. I see that as Mark Sanford of SC.

After one term, McCain will pass the torch to the incumbent VP, who should come on like gangbusters in 2012.

That ought to please every relevant Republican; IMHO. Forget what wishful thinkers expect.

Hey if it walks, acts, and looks
like a duck, then let the duck quack.

Anyone who has watched McCains pitiful performance in his town hall meetings can't stop laughing at your absurd suggestion. Mr. Towery, if you truly believe what your saying, you are part of the problem.

Most have seen the cut of the lady yelling at McCain about taxes and getting off our backs. What does he do? He thanks her as if she were complimenting him and doesn't address her concern in the least. Unbeleiveable.

That being said, Mr. Towery, I agree with you. Let the duck quack. Let McCain be McCain so all can see his true colors and what a pitiful candidate he represents for small government, liberty minded people.

Either way, whether he is himself, or improves on his acting lessons he'll never receive my vote.

Here's what it takes to
vote for McLame

http://getdrunkandvote4mccain.com/

Yes let McLame be Lame
This is what he wants with his amnesty and open borders. Note that the effected States are all high in illegal migrants.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,379388,00.html

thank you, myles in ca


If you're unwilling to back Sen. McCain; that's OK. It's your vote, cast it anyway you want.

But you're to be commended for posting here like a responsible adult. You state your opinion using his true name; not snide little digs, as in "McLame," or other juvenile aliases.

People who come here to Toon Hall more often behave like Beavis and Butthead. It seems they're sniggering at their keyboards thrilled at their joke-writing attempts, and not realizing what mutts they really are.

When these idiots have done what they THINK is damage, they go back to their insipid lives; and on election day they don't even bother to vote.

I hope you won't forego your opportunity to vote, Myles. I am definitely going to. Mine will be for John McCain; the next President of our United States.

Wrong, Towery!! You Go Home Now!!
What primaries were you watching, Towery? McCain stumbled his way to the nomination. Had there not been five or six legitimate conservatives splitting media attention and the primary vote while McCain garnered liberal Rep attention, McCain would have been McDead. McCain has performed so badly thus far that one gets the sense that he has destiny on his side, given that he is in a near dead heat with Snowbama, who by the way much of centrist America distrusts as a closet anti-white racist. One hopes that from this point forward the adults take do, indeed, over the McCain campaign.

And, by the way Towery, the Romney choice is an IQ test for McCain--you've already flunked. Romney delivers MI, tightens the West up, connects money to the RNC coffers, salves the wounds of value and conservative voters, and shines as the smartest economic stump speaker of all the candidates who've run this year.

Do they pay you for writing this kind of ill-conceived crap? Surely no one antes up good money for poiltical consulting from you.

McCain is being McCain
BWaaah! Ha! CCOMNLOL (Coke coming out my nose Laughing out Loud)

The method behind the stupidity is that McCain is being McCain - he thinks this is the way to win!!!


McCain being McCain II
Actually I think the most accurate thing I have heard on McCain is that he doesn't really care if he wins the presidency or not - his goal was to a) get the nomination and b) destroy the Republican Party. He's succeeded on both fronts - there is no game plan beyond the convention.

This column is so true.
The surest way to make sure Obama is elected is to name Romney as VP and let the GOP establishment run the McCain campaign. If McCain would just be himself and run towards the middle, he could win.

Virginia Patriot #27
You're right (as usual). In Ill. the write-in candidates have to be registered with the election entity...each precinct ... in order to be counted if someone does write in his or her name. They won't be printed on the ballot; just listed on a separate paper so a voter can check the spelling of the names.

On Super Tuesday we had only Dem, Rep and Green parties on our ballots. So Barr (of the ACLU) and the Libertarians better get busy if they expect to run anybody in St.Clair County.

It's getting so it's almost too much to ask voters to pay attention to what they do, when they register, whom they vote for, and why. They can recite the rules for voting on American Idol, but some of the folks who most strongly don't want an Obama Socialism intend to stay home and thus not vote the down-ticket contests.

Voting for Dr. Sauerberg will get rid of Dick Durbin. Now, isn't that more than worth it?

wasted votes on the right fringe


The political deade end of write-in and 3rd party voting is well-proven. We have a 2-party system; and it works quite efficiently.

Not that we always get what we think is right. But it comes always from the party of the Left or the opposition party from the Right. Everything else is wasted votes. Especially write-ins. They don't mean ZILCH.

On some ocassion such as happened with H Ross Perot; the 3rd-party name was famous and well-financed. Yet even Perot was swamped easily. The only thing he accomplished was a split of the Right's eventual vote; enabling Bubba to squeeze into the White House with a bare 39% of the total. And PEROT was immensely popular.

The names you people mention are DOA. Dead On Arrival. Nobody is going to waste the time to run out to the polls for those MUTTS.

McLame has thrown
Phil Graham under the bus now because he told the truth about the economy.

If I was PG I would resign and blast McLame.

dreadnaught
are you really Peter Wirs?

p.c....and others
I feel better when folks out there zing Juan!
A lot of true things have been said against Mc
Cain..!
My son is so stubborn..he refuses to accept the idea that Juan will choose someone else
other than Mitt...durn kids just will not listen to their KNOW IT ALL PARENTS.! Since he's
6'6" tall and weighs about 260 lbs. I just humor him..by saying 'YEAH,YOUR RIGHT'..gulp...
The other day he just shoved me playing..I went clean accross the kitchen.and ended up in the sink.! He had to spoon me out of the sink!
So when he says to me" Mitt is going to be the VP"....being ELVIS..I just say"OHHH, YEAH,
UHHHHH HUHHH!" And get out of there!If Mitt isn't chosen...Iam going to hide in the trees
for a week! Thanks for the comment, P.C.
elvis

Ha! elvis - I've got you beat!
My son is 17, 6'5" and 340! I don't tell him what to do either - good thing he's a pretty good kid. The guy is, of course, a football player, (powerful legs like tree trunks) but his real passion is basketball and he is awesome, has been since he was a little tyke. My other son is 22, 6'5" but only around 200 - also good at basketball and his passion is golf. Iv'e got 3 young adults voting for the first time this year and it's darn shame their only choice is McCain!


p.c. ..wow!
Isn't it great that your sons can vote for
a demorat!!! ha ha ha ha!
Geez, we gotta let johnnie be johnnie..BURP!
Wow! Being a mormon you are supposed to be doing your GENEOLOGY...HA HA HA! IS KING KONG RELATED TO EITHER YOU OR YOUR HUSBAND..?
YOU KNOW THAT BIG DUDE THAT CLIMBED THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING..! With your sons size..
what kind of water are they drinking from niagra falls!?
ELVIS

elvis, yeah, it stinks
,to have to hold your nose on your first go-round. Hey, my first pres vote was for Reagan- what a pleasure that was.

My husband and I are both of Danish and English descent. His side has some pretty tall fellows, but all fairly thin, so we don't know where our son came from exactly! He is one strong dude, though.

Yea, I know McCain is a hard pill to swallow, but I'm going to. I know it's not necessarily in Romney best interest to be tied at the hip to McCain, but I still hope he is VP for the good of the country.

Hope all is well for you and your family!

Plastic Coin-Op "Maverick" Kiddie Ride
"The Republican electorate ... wanted someone who could appeal to moderates and mavericks. "

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

This is just TOO hilarious. Many of the people who nominated Mack did not necessarily want him to be elected POTUS; they wanted to sabotage the GOP. More wanted to help defeat conservatism. The ones who brung him were mainly the pop media. "Moderates" are code for crossovers & the indifferent. Yeah, right, look to THEM for contributions. Good luck.

As to "mavericks" and the "Bush-Cheney machine" what makes you think McCain is some sort of rebel? The pop media? Your precious "maverick" has bucked against only one thing and only one segment of the electorate, & that's conservatism & conservatives. Truth is, he eats out of the hand of the "establishment," drinks its Kool-Aid, lives on its reservation, & parrots its mantras. Of course he'll use the inhouse team once he's in place.

Apparently they think the electorate is so utterly stoopid it'll elect a GOP company man because the talking heads say he's a maverick & a rebel, without 1 iota of evidence that is so.

The real problem w/ the Bush Administration was its failure to stand up for conservatism. Mack will not correct that defect in any way. If Georgie had the spine to veto McCain-Feingold, this problem might not exist now. A McCain administration would be everything that is wrong w/ the GWB regime, plus a whopping helping of overt fascism (supression of campaign speech, energy rationing) & a giveaway of American soveriegnty partly via open borders.

The real agenda for this election, as BrianR pointed out, is to alienate, estrange, freeze-out, & marginalize conservatives & any conservative agenda from the GOP, regardless of which candidate wins.

I can't see that Romney, or anybody else, even Ron Paul, much less that weasel Huckabee, would as VP in any way make up for Mack.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.