Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
TOP NEWS   LeftArrow - Townhall.com   RightArrow - Townhall.com  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Thursday, March 06, 2008
Matt Towery :: Townhall.com Columnist
McCain Must Seize Economic Issue While Democrats Fight On
by Matt Towery
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What do you think of John McCain's selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his running mate?



Last week, our firm, InsiderAdvantage, became the first independent pollster to indicate that Hillary Clinton was leading the Texas Democratic primary. After she won both Texas and Ohio, numerous GOP pundits were gleeful over the prospects of a likely Democratic battle all the way to the Democrats' convention this summer.

While conventional wisdom might suggest that such a protracted intraparty battle would give Republican John McCain lots of time to raise money and catch his breath, there is another side to the situation.

We are in a political season unlike any that we have seen in most of our lifetimes. People are watching political debates in numbers usually reserved for pop singing contests or television ballroom-dancing battles.

The Clinton-Obama war is providing both political junkies and everyday Americans with plenty of entertainment. And with no GOP contest to follow, the Democratic fight is truly the only show on the air. Neither uncomfortable press conferences with President Bush nor endless speculation about who might be the next Republican vice-presidential running mate will keep John McCain in the limelight.

McCain has been unfairly characterized as a man who does not understand economics, and who has been a lifelong traitor to conservative approaches to national economic policy.

With all due respect to those who deride him, let me recall my years as a partisan, and a very involved one. I recall that my friend Jack Kemp, who once campaigned for me, was never one to be viewed as anything but a bedrock conservative. He worked with a young John McCain on a conservative Republican economic agenda long before certain columnists and pundits darkened the doors of Washington, D.C.

I'll freely admit that McCain's failure to originally support the Bush tax cuts was a serious error, but I will also note that he truly was consistent with his longtime mantra that spending must be reigned in at the same time that taxes were cut.

McCain has good advisors and supporters -- as did Kemp -- who could serve as the nucleus of a dynamic economic summit in which the brightest minds of not only the GOP, but of a host of nonpartisan organizations, could meet to determine a realistic and dynamic plan to turn our nation's economy around; not just for a year, but for many years to come.

Has anyone noticed that Hillary Clinton, who clearly seized on the economy and her asserted experience in dealing with "hard times" to appeal to voters in Ohio, is using the slogan "Solutions for America." I bring this up because former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich left the presidential race behind in favor of his think-tank effort called "American Solutions." Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Matt Towery is a former National Republican legislator of the year and author of Powerchicks: How Women Will Dominate America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Matt Towery's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Subject: Ray - Didn't read the link, didja?
--
No further comment needed.


For more information pertinent to the Fourteenth Amendment's impact upon the Second Amendment (where the issue of BoR restrictions imposed upon the governments of the several states is particularly important), other readers are advised to consider:

1) http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/freedman.html

2) http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/2nd_Amend/fourteenth_amend.h tm

3) http://law.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5660&co ntext=expresso

...among many, many, many other sources of scholarly discussion.

Ray, you just keep on digging that funky stuff out of your navel and searching it for insights.

Go with your well-practiced aptitudes, okay?





---------------
"[T]he Clinton administration launched an attack on people in Texas because those people were religious nuts with guns. Hell, this country was *founded* by religious nuts with guns. Who does Bill Clinton think stepped ashore on Plymouth Rock? Peace Corps volunteers?"

-- P.J. O'Rourke









----------------
"As I sit in my poverty-stricken home, looking at the place where the piano used to be before I had to sell it to pay my income-tax, I find myself in thoughtful mood. The first agony of the separation from my hard-earned, so to speak income, is over, and I can see that I was unjust in my original opinion of the United States Government. At first, I felt toward the U.S.G. as I would feel toward any perfect stranger who insinuated himself into my home and stood me on my head and went through my pockets. The only difference I could see between the U.S.G. and the ordinary practitioner in a black mask was that the latter occasionally left his victim carfare."

-- P.G. Wodehouse


The Rule of Law
SJ Doc's reliance on the 14h Amendment over the 13th is telling. The 13th, proposed by a Republican Congress 1/31/1865 and ratified 12/6/65, outlawed slavery and involuntary servitude. Lincoln's stand against slavery in the Lincoln-Douglas debates and at Coopers Union is not mentioned, nor are the many Republicans who backed him to the death who did so to preserve the Union and to outlaw slavery, at least in the North. The Roger Taney Supreme Court 1857 Dred Scott decision had made slavery legal in all states and declared the black man a mere chattel, like horse or a dog, ineligible to vote.

The 14th Amendment on the other hand has been used to foster an alien invasion by creating anchor babies; and to make the Bill of Rights binding on the States, something - beyond a reasonable doubt - the Congress never intended. So much for "the defense of individual rights and the concept of civil government under rule of law." Where in the Constitution is judicial amendment sanctioned? It isn't, except by agreement by conduct of all three branches (otherwise known in criminal law as conspiracy). And let us never forget that the separation of church and state judicial amendment, overturning 150 years of precedent without comment, and in direct contradiction thereof, was created by 9 Masonic Democrats, one an ex Ku Klux clansman. Nor only did the court not follow precedent, the rule of law, it did not follow the intent of Congress in drafting the 14th Amendment, another rule of law. Further, it fraudulently twisted Jefferson’s words to the Danbury, Conn. Baptists to infer support for separation of church and state, despite Jefferson regularly attending Christian services at the Capitol on Sundays during his presidency and not ever being a member of the Constitutional Convention.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone: