Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Matt Towery :: Townhall.com Columnist
Could Edwards Spoil Hillary and Obama's Party in Iowa?
by Matt Towery
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Let me start by admitting that John Edwards is not the sort of candidate I would necessarily consider voting for in a presidential contest. I don't dislike him. I just don't care for his political views.

I say that to emphasize that I never allow my personal feelings or opinions to influence my analysis of our polling.

A second example of our work was the poll we conducted in Florida just prior to the recent CNN/YouTube Republican presidential debate in that state. It was the first poll I know of that showed former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee moving into second place among GOP candidates in any state.

I thought we would be butchered by the press for showing this sea change in the presidential sweepstakes. But this big change was a real one. And after the debate -- right after two more of our polls showed that both Floridians and Iowans thought Huckabee was the winner -- Huckabee indeed began his rapid ascent across the country.

Now we have put our neck out even further with a poll earlier in the week that showed Edwards is virtually tied with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama among highly likely participants in the Iowa Democratic caucus.

Even more significant, Edwards is the second choice of those who support the other Democratic candidates, and by a fairly strong plurality.

That's important in the Iowa Democratic caucus system. If the candidate you vote for doesn't get at least 15 percent of the vote, you must then choose from among those candidates that did get at least 15 percent.

Edwards' lead on that "second ballot" could make him a real threat in what so far has been characterized as a fight between Clinton and Obama.

If Edwards were to win in Iowa, then the Democratic nomination process could start to unravel. New Hampshire voters love to vote in ways contrary to what might be expected. They might just decide to join with Edwards as the dark horse candidate.

And a more competitive Edwards would likely cost Clinton in South Carolina, where African-Americans make up nearly 50 percent of the Democratic vote. Blacks there are starting to side with Obama, with Clinton and Edwards battling for the white vote.

It could be that, much like the suddenly struggling Rudy Giuliani for the Republicans, Clinton's only shot at turning the race around is Florida. Clinton has consistently led in the polls in Florida, and it might be hard for Edwards to overtake her in the Sunshine State.

However, Florida's biggest Democratic power is no longer the teachers unions, but the association that represents the state's trial lawyers. And there is no mistaking that trial lawyers throughout the nation are supporting one of their own -- Edwards. If Edwards started to gain real momentum in the Democratic race, and if the Florida Trial Bar threw its considerable weight behind him in that state, Edwards might have a shot at overtaking Clinton.

That would put him in a sweet position going into the Feb. 5 quasi-national primary, a.k.a. Tsunami Tuesday.

Admittedly, polling in Iowa this year is very tough. And our poll is the only one we've seen that shows Edwards even close to Obama and Clinton. But when someone like Iowa's top political writer, David Yepsen, writes that he believes Edwards might pull off a shocking victory there, it's tough not to believe that the poll is, at minimum, a sign that Edwards is more of a factor in Iowa than was believed just a week ago.

What would it mean to a potential GOP nominee if Edwards actually won the Democratic presidential nomination?

It might help the Republican nominee's chances. Edwards is by far the most liberal of the three major Democratic candidates. His passionate leftist positions might make Huckabee or Mitt Romney appear to be the moderate in the race. And Giuliani would be in safe territory with both conservatives and moderates were he to face Edwards.

Remember, a chief knock against Romney is that he's too plastic, too fake. But by contrast with Edwards, Romney looks like a model of sincerity.

If the rap on Huckabee is that his views are too extreme, Edwards' views would make him seem like a centrist.

And if the youthful-looking and handsome Edwards matches up against Giuliani, the former New York City mayor would suddenly look like his opponent's wise and experienced father.

In other words, a nominated Edwards could give the GOP a shot at keeping the White House.

If Clinton survives all of her baggage and all the potential bad news from early caucuses and primaries, and goes on to win the Democratic nomination, it's my guess that she would defeat any of the major GOP candidates.

If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, all bets are off as to one general election outcome or the other.

But if it's Edwards, and the GOP can throw in a little bit of luck, they might survive George W. Bush and cling to the presidency for another four years.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Matt Towery is a former National Republican legislator of the year and author of Powerchicks: How Women Will Dominate America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Matt Towery's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
Edwards Love-Child Story
Is this the work of Hillary Clinton with Edwards surging? What should Edwards do?

HP-The National Enquirer has gone political in their most recent issue, alleging that John Edwards has fathered a love-child with a filmmaker who once worked on a series of webisodes for his One America Committee. Rumors of the affair between Edwards and the filmmaker, a 43-year-old divorcee named Rielle Hunter, have been denied by both parties.

Now, as the Enquirer has published photos of a clearly pregnant Hunter, she has gone on the record confirming that she is pregnant but denying that Edwards is the father. She claims that the biological father is Edwards operative Andrew Young, a married man who confirms both his extramarital affair with Hunter and that the baby is his. Hunter, who lived in New York, has recently relocated to a gated community in North Carolina near Young and his family. But, the Enquirer claims that Hunter is privately telling friends that Edwards fathered the baby.

Edwards on infidelity

WATCH VIDEO

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/edwards-love-child -story




ther missus clinton and her nagatives
if she is polling poorly now it is because the dims habit of standing in a circular firing squad. The real fireworks haven't even started and accoprding polls 40% claim they could nev er vote for the clintons under any circumstances. Make no mistake any victory for the missus clinton retunrs bubba to the presidentcy. The only necessary tactic is to give the clintons the podium and their own words doom them. Perhaps the msm will attempt to do it's public function and ask some real questions. If the missus clinton wants to be pres. she needs to stand up to some hard questions and explain her role in past clinton functions. It isn't old news if it hasn't been fully vetted

Edwards spoil it?
Not if his recent love child has anything to say about it. Guess not only does Edwards believe in Two Americas, he also promotes Two Families.

"Spoil the party"?
More like f--k up the junkyard.

Socialist Reptile
This iguana-like, sculptured-haired, cold-blooded opportunist makes Hillary Clinton seem sincere. Ann Coulter said that if Democrats had any brains they'd be Republicans and the slate of candidates the Dems are putting up this time is ample proof of that. But among that raft of crooks, buffoons and losers that threaten our nation's very existence from the debate podium Edwards stands out as an especially egregious example of left-wing idiocy. He doesnt make sense. His anecdotes and justifications of his hard-line, anti-freedom policies are incoherent and embarrassing. Have the Dems declined so much that a schmoe like this could be considered a plausible steward of the economy or our foreign policy?

shells
I guess we can see in edweirds that his alledged devotion to his dying wife is just more lawyerly blathering that he is addressing to the electorate rather than just a jury. That is if the story has truth to it. Based on past clinton actions and those of the operative bootlickers are various hireings the story may be just that. But it may be just a bit more hypocrisy on the part of the pretty boy. But you would think he would have the decency to wait until the wifes body is cold prior to his philanderings, again if that story is true. I am starting to scare myself. I sound lkike I might be more like a dim apologist

Wildwest
Who knows if the allegations are true, but for fun times before the holidays, let's suppose they really are!

Edwards has been using his dying wife as a tool during his entire campaign. When he speaks, he waves his left hand which boldly shows the bright yellow band he wears. Everything is a show for the public, the jury, the voters.

Considering Edwards is a democrat, having un-protected sex and not worrying about the consequences seems normal to me, don't you think so? What was odd was that she chose to keep the baby instead of aborting it, since she too is unmarried, a democrat and works on his campaign.

I guess she liked the look of his house and thought keeping the baby would gain her a wonderful house as well. It may just still.

The Breck Boy
Just thinking about this slimeball getting anywhere near the White House makes me want to lose the food I've eaten thus far today.

ginny
you have now become number three on the list of those edweirds plans to sue when he doesn't become president. I maintain this ambulance chaser is secretly planning on suing america to become preident. Should he actually become president he probably will inform congress they are all subject to legal action if they don't enact his agenda

What
No wonder the DEMS are pushing for FREE MEDICAL CARE for all. They need it to take care of their half breeds. Just another DEM PUNKING THE HELP I SEE.

If It Aint True...
If this story is untrue why are the woman and the supposed father in hiding? Wouldnt they be eager to call a press conference and demand a genetic test (I dont know if its possible before birth) if they were the parents? After Edwards pandering about his wife's illness this should convince all but the most idiotic that he's not even fit to be a trial lawyer.

They can sample amniotic fluid
while a baby is in utero for possible congenital defects. I'm sure they can get DNA from it.

Otherwise, I am very happy Edwards is under assault while his wife is dying of cancer. Makes him all the more the smarmy courtroom hypocrite he is.

But as for ALL THREE DEMS. BEING TIED--WOWIE!!!

Maybe they can have a menage a trois while Bill watches. It would embrace all the elements the left holds so dear: multiculturalism, all sex at all times (the younger the better), public display of matters best left behind closed doors, challenge the Sup. Ct.'s acknowledgement of porno when they see it but can't define it legally, and show how inclusive they-all can be.

None of them shot get a shot at beng pres, of this country.

Eh, Deadwards got arse kicked by CHENEY
So, no chances of his winning nomination.

Primaries need repair
This country badly needs to address its antiquated and archaic system of electing an American president. The ballyhoo that grabs media attention and prominence every other minute, stemming from Iowa, is ridiculous.

Iowa, no less. What the heck is Iowa? Representative of the United States as a whole? Sorry, Charlie, not by a long shot. Neither is New Hampshire, neither is South Carolina. Each of these states has a very specific complexion that, unfortunately, due to our archaic system, actually seems to drive who gets the nomination nod.

For myself, I don't care what Iowans think of Mike Huckabee. For me, he is the absolute last candidate I would vote for. I only hope Edwards DOES upset the apple cart and even that he gets the nomination. Then a GOP victory is a given.

Edwards needs a miracle
Edwards needs more than a win in Iowa, he needs a miracle.

Nationwide, Clinton is leading Obama by double digits, and Obama is leading Edwards by double digits. So if Edwards does NOT win in Iowa, he's road kill. The only way he can even survive until Super Tuesday is if he pulls off a surprise upset in Iowa, which seem unlikely.

And even if he does pull a surprise in Iowa, he has no structure in any other state, and probably won't be able to leverage his win. He's probably hoping a surprise win brings unanticipated support out of the woodwork so he can continue his efforts. In my estimation, it simply ain't gonna happen.

Huckabee's a different story, for the simple reason that Huckabee is a lot more sincere. He's already gathering the kind of momentum that will produce more than adequate funding, and the national numbers show it.

The more accurate comparison would be with Fred Thompson, who is showing the same sorts of numbers as Edwards nationally. Thompson has sensed an opportunity in Iowa, but even if he manages to pull almost even with the leaders there, it's unlikely he'd be able to leverage that into a big win anywhere else.

(Unrelated to this topic, please read my political blog, "Plumb Bob Blog: Squaring the Culture" at http://www.plumbbobblog.com. Thanks.)

Matt Towery's article
sounds more like he's predicting a beauty contest than a political election.

I don't think the sleaze lovechild story is worth a comment at all, especially since it was posted by Konop. I followed one of his links once, and found the video to be completely the opposite of what he touted it to be. I think he assumes people will just read his tout and not bother to follow the link. I quit bothering to even read his tout- he's on my scroll-by list.


Skep41: You say he (Edwards) doesn't make sense.
To you and me, maybe. But unfortunately, he probably makes perfect sense to alot of liberals.

wildwest: circular firing squad!! Love that.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.