Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, November 16, 2006
Matt Towery :: Townhall.com Columnist
Lott avenges media double standard
by Matt Towery
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


It's funny how political missteps can destroy some people, while leaving others standing, even smiling.

Thank goodness Republican Mississippi Sen. Trent Lott -- one of those once nearly destroyed -- proved this week that media's plunging, twisting knives can be extracted.

No, I'm not a "neocon" -- a term I despise -- for defending Lott against 4-year-old charges of racial insensitivity. I'm just being fair.

So fair that I'm even understanding of a far more virulent overstatement presented recently by some civil rights icons. I point out this contemporary gaffe to make my point about media character assassinations by way of comparison.

Just days before the recent elections, Congressman John Lewis (D-Ga.) and former Congressman, Ambassador and Mayor Andrew Young lent their voices to a radio ad designed to promote the African-American Democratic candidate for chairman of Fulton County, Georgia's largest.

The ad partly said and partially hinted that should the Republican candidate be elected, blacks would see their lives returned to the days of being fire-hosed in the streets, among other Jim Crow-type sufferings.

Lewis himself warned voters -- mostly black ones targeted by ads on predominantly black radio stations -- that their "very lives" depended on their supporting the Democratic candidate.

The ad aired late in the campaign. Maybe that's why local and national media hardly noticed its excess, even though some of the most liberal local reporters covering the campaign were shocked that few watchdogs noticed the ad. But many who heard it called the ad pure race-baiting. The text and subtext of the radio spot insinuated that a band of 1950s thug policemen and vigilantes would find a way to beat the daylights out of listeners if the Republican were elected.

Again, let's be fair. People who actually know John Lewis, Andrew Young and current Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin, who also contributed to the ad, will attest that they're all honorable, experienced public servants. Lewis may continue to indulge in the notion that he is still being beaten on the infamous Edmund Pettis Bridge in Alabama during a historic civil rights march decades ago, but nevertheless, he is kind and goodhearted. Mayor Franklin works well with all ethnicities and races in her diverse city, most notably the white business community. And Young is far too worldly to purposely participate in racial harangue.

In truth, this ad was a patchwork of comments that were edited into a distasteful final product -- so we could declare it without malice and move on.

Such a balanced assessment wasn't afforded Trent Lott in 2002, however, when he tried to flatter 100-year-old Sen. Strom Thurmond at his birthday party by saying America would have been better off had Thurmond been elected president when he ran in 1948.

Instead, ravenous, righteous media reminded us that Thurmond had run as a segregationist.

Never mind that it had been 54 years previous. It might as well have been 54 days. A pound of flesh was exacted by the liberal inquisition. Worse, many of Lott's colleagues abandoned him and ran for cover. He had to resign as majority leader of the Senate. It was the most despicable railroading of a public official I've ever witnessed.

Now I read media reports of Lott's return to power. He has scored an upset win over Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee to become minority whip of the U.S. Senate.

One report this week paraphrased Lott's 2002 Thurmond comments as having said the nation would be "better off had it elected Strom Thurmond president in 1948, when he ran on a segregationist platform."

The quotation marks encase the journalist's words, but those words might as well have been attributed directly to Lott.

This characterization is like too many others. They take what was meant to be harmless praise to a very old man and turn it into a sort of verbal Klan ride. Lott never even mentioned segregation.

We will never end the media mentality that takes causal leaps to connect Republican or conservative stumblings with abominable intentions. Nor will we ever see liberal misstatements treated in a like manner.

The sweetest redemption for having been lynched by opportunistic media is renewed success. Way to go, Trent Lott. You beat them all.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Matt Towery is a former National Republican legislator of the year and author of Powerchicks: How Women Will Dominate America.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Matt Towery's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
 
©Creators Syndicate
This deliberate twisting of words
reminds me of what I saw in Newsweek today. It said that Allen had called his opponent's staffer "a macaca" instead of "Macaca." There's a world of difference, and these people who've spent their lives studying writing know it. It's absolutely perverse.

Ah...one problem with this article...
It wasn't the liberal press that did Lott in; it was the Laura Ingrahams and the Peggy Noonans...who said that he had to go...Noonan even wrote an article months after Lott lost his position, lamenting that Lott didn't seem to be putting himself out there for his fellow Republicans--and commented that considering the way they, INCLUDING her, had treated him, she couldn't blame him.

If they had supported his right to make an off the cuff remark and not turned it into a big deal...America would have gotten over it and moved on. (Look how quickly the Kerry statement disappeared--and the guy didn't even make an honest apology.)

For days the RINO press complained about the Foley and Hastert issue--yet it was THEY who kept bringing it up, not the MSM.

Oh and let us not forget the full page ads they ran about Miers...a woman who made fabulous choices for judiciary appointments, but wasn't "bright" enough to serve.

I do not think I am alone in believing that the RINO media has lost all credibility--In fact in the last couple of days, I've heard a few politicians who survived the mid term elections, get rather snippy with talk show hosts...no more kow towing to the rEPUBLICANS iN nAME oNLY...and why should they...looks like the base wasn't all that powerful after all.

While others pray for a REAL Conservative Congress and President... I pray for a Republican media that understands words like loyalty, honesty, and support.

Someone wrote a post about a litmus test for Conservatives...here's mine:

Anyone who calls himself/herself the "base" of the GOP but denies being Republican...preferring the term "Conservative" as though they are too "smart" to belong to any political party is not my kind of Conservative.

There's something very shady about this kind of double talk and "using" a group to get your agenda across should make every Conservative...every decent human being...cringe.

Lets get real.
There is no question that the roof fell in on Trent Lott, when others who were just as egregious in their statements got a pass from the MSM. It is simply a fact of life that conservatives and Republicans will be ripped apart by the media and Democrats will get a pass.


Towrey makes no sense to me when he talks about what really nice people John Lewis, Andrew Young and Shirley Franklin really are. Towrey does the same thing for them he did for that racist lunatic Cynthia McKinney. He shows us the good side of these race baiters. I think Towrey may have been dropped on his head when he was a baby.


No matter how various statements by these three individuals were cut and pasted to make up that dispicable campaign commercial, they are in fact racists in their politics, and in Lewis's case he has a history of outrageos statements like this one.


What really gripes me about this is that Trent Lott got exactly what he deserved. I just saw the clip of what he said at the bash honoring Strom Thurmand. Lott said that he voted for Thurmond when Thurmond ran for President. He went on to say that if Thurmond had been elected we would not have had a lot of the trouble we had in the years following that.


It could not be any more clear. Trent Lott was saying that if Thurmond had won, the whole civil rights struggle would not have happened. I think he meant it , and I have contempt for what he said. When he claimed that he was only trying to make the old man feel good I think he probably was.


I just don't think Strom Thurmond deserved that kind of praise for his racist , evil actions as a Dixicrat. Sure, time has passed, and the country has changed. Strom Thurmond wound up having considerable support from blacks before he retired. He was forgiven. Fine. That is the Christian way.


But for Trent Lott to claim that things would have been better if Thurmond had won as the slimy racist that he was is incredible. Lott played the fool. He was in a job that definitely does not need a fool. Trent Lott is a white man from Mississippi who voted for a Dixicrat. He should have had better sense than to say what he did. I didn't feel sorry for him when he was forced to step down, and I don't feel sorry for him now. I don't trust him either.


Of course I would feel more comfortable with him in office than the traitorous Democrats who control the government now. Politics today seems filled with unpalatable choices on election day. That is just the world we live in. Too bad.

Humble Pie
It's also an interesting contrast in character between conservatives and liberals that when humiliated, conservatives will display a possession of conscience.

Whereas when liberals are humiliated, well, you can't really humiliate a liberal - to them there's nothing base, everything is acceptable under the right circumstances (of which they will be the judge) and they will actually just turn up the arrogance.

When liberals hold conservatives to our values, we realize when we fall short and even step aside (per conscience, above).

When conservatives try to hold liberals to their values, the values are so slippery that nothing holds.

Conservatives may seek redemption, but liberals - and this includes the MSM - refuse to grant it. Liberals, of course, don't see the need to seek redeption (see arrogance, above).

skip
Oh please...that's the lamest spin I've ever heard...how do you extrapolate the whole civil rights issue from a birthday toast?

There were all kinds of things happening back when Strom was running for president...like most people were grateful to those who served in the military....cops were respected....little boys wanted to grow up to be firemen...people helped their neighbors...children were blessings.

How do you know that isn't what Lott meant when toasted a man who had lived a century...you really need to ask yourself why you RINOs and the RINO press has to turn everything into a negative?

merrygoboy
Ok, here's your "basic" lesson Sanity 101...Republicans are supposed to look out for REPUBLICAN concerns...if you are a here today and gone tomorrow supporter, then you can't be around long enough to make an impact.

Thus you will always be frustrated...always angry...and you will always lose.

no Lott
Why Lott is back I don't know. He caved in to the Democrats time after time when he was majority leader...Hillary has the FBI files on Lott, he is stalemated.

All I know is
we lost a good man in Michael Steele...and I believe the the Trent Lott thing is going to ruin us. I keep remembering the 900 FBI files and I am positive that his file is among them....so, the BEAST owns him....Republicans are just not street fighters and will lose every time they give the dems an even break. I am remembering when Lott was Speaker and he wanted to bring the dem into leadership positions....and so what did that get him?....a chance to step down because of a remark that was made in jest......The Shame is that Republicans can't lead whether they are in the minority or the majority....can someone please teach them how to dirty fight....it's the only way.
PS..Anyone watch the Glenn Beck thing last night?
Just wondering?

Sandy: Disturbing Glenn Beck Show
"PS..Anyone watch the Glenn Beck thing last night?
Just wondering?"

Yes, I saw it & it basically confirmed what I've suspected for years: apparently our BETTERS in the MSM have arbitrarily decided to shield us weak minded PROLETARIAT from the reality of Islamic Fundamentalism in the form of anti- American, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian propaganda routinely aired by Middle-eastern, state-run television stations. God only knows- we might go out and burn down a Mosque…

On a side note, Glenn Beck did cite some dissenters who have publicly critized said Islamic-Fundamentalists- at their own peril.

Please explain the difference...
Amulek...I have no idea what the difference is between those two phrases, and I suppose, neither do many others....for me, please point out the difference...I am sure there was a lot of 'dust up' made over nothing.

And, Demosthenes....
My vote would be to show it on each of the main stream meida's news outlets...NO? I wonder WHY?

Wanted new guy...not Lott!
I really believe we needed new blood in leadership. I do think its good that Lott got to get back at his detractors by getting a leadership position back, but I was hoping for some younger blood and new thinking on the Republican side. Better luck next time!

I don't think Lott ment anything racial by his statement at the birthday toast, if I thought he did, I would want his head too. His comment did not say he wanted the civil rights to end then, he was trying to make a old man feel good on his birthday.

But then the media just ran away with it on every major paper and tv station over and over again. Day after day for a few days. Oh but Kerrys (messed up joke) one word missing (22 I believe words if you read his web sites retelling of what the joke was supposed to be)from his attack at Bush and not the troops. It does not matter who the joke was intended to hit, it hit me and most of the "underprivledge" and "poor" of our country that Kerry and his like care about. I did not get through college and neither have most of the poor and underprivledged. So we are all too stupid and if we were in office I guess we would be bogged down in Iraq

Wanted new guy...not Lott!
Sorry did not finish "sTuped s wat Stopid duz".

I guess I would be bogged down in Iraq as well. But all the major press put it on the back page. The TV reporters passed it as an obvious joke "ha-ha". If anyone conservative misspeaks it’s an attack and he got caught. If a liberal does it it’s a misquoted statement, or an accident. My problem is not Kerry, after hearing it in context for the 5th or 6th time I believe he misspoke. I believe he should have apologized immediately for what any troops might have thought he was implying only and then it was meant to attack the president. I would have a much less problem with it, even though I do not like the attacks against the president while we ARE fighting "radicals"! But that is neither here nor there.

But I do think this is what Kerry thinks! Listen to his statement on the troops after he left Vietnam, or our current troop’s atrocities. And far be it from me to say that our president, Rumsfeld, or our generals have not made mistakes. They all have lots of them.

But name me one ongoing war or conflict in the history of the world where there were not; mistakes made, accidents to civilian, atrocities, and friendly fire?


not a big deal
Senator Lotts words were not that big a deal, ...said in humor and caring for an old man on the verge of death, an old man who stood for more than segregation of more than 50 years ago. He grew as do we all. Lott knows the senate and how the rules are played. He is a conservative who knows when to fight and when to concede. He is strong. Frisk who followed him didn't know how the rules were played, was too nice for that political milieu and not a leader.

Dishonest media and Democrats.
It is interesting to note that throughout the history of the Democratic Party, they have unambiguously been racist.

Following the signing of the Kansas-Nebraska Act -- the bill that brought slavery to the Western Territories, a bunch of disgruntled abolitionists from the Democratic and Whig Parties formed the Republican Party.

Following the Civil War, the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments got unanimous support from Republicans, and unanimous rejection from Democrats.

In the 1870s, the Democratic Party was forced to admit that they formed the Ku Klux Klan as a means of stopping the spread of the Republican Party.

Democrat Franklin Roosevelt was one of the biggest supporters of the Klan. His first appointee to the Supreme Court, Hugo Black, was a life memeber of the KKK. Harry Truman, whom FDR named Vice President, joined the Ku Klux Klan in 1923.

Speaking of Truman, most of his cabinet were members of the Klan.

During the civil right battles of the 1960s, Democrats Strom Thrumond and Robert Byrd set records for the longest fillibusters in history to try to prevent the Civil Rights Act from passing. Eventually, the Act got the support of over 80% of Republicans, and barely 60% of Democrats.

Contrary to the common misconception, following the Act's passage, most segregationist Democrats either left politics altogether, or were forced to reject their former racism (As Strom Thurmond did. Thurmond was the major backer of the Martin Luther King holiday, was the first senator to hire a black staffer, and was given numerous awards from the black community for his work promoting civil rights following his segregationist days).

There were two major examples, though, of segregationists refusing to reject racism. The first is current Democrat West Virginia senator, and Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan, Robert Byrd. The other is the author of the Southern Manifesto, former Democrat senator from Arkansas, William Fullbright, whom President Bill Clinton awarded the highest non-military distinction that can be awarded (the Presidential Medal of Freedom), and who Clinton claimed was a hero of his while he was growing up.

Today, a number of racist policies are still supported by the Democratic Party.

For example, abortion. The founder of Planned Parenthood -- one of the biggest providers of abortions in the US -- Margaret Sanger was an infameous eugenecist who believed that the "black, brown, and yellow races" were inherently inferior, and believed in forced sterilizations and abortions were the "solution" to their "infestation". Today, over 80% of Planned Parenthood facilities are located in majority-black communities.

Another example is the minimum wage. The first minimum wage was imposed in the 1930s on the construction industry for the sole purpose of increasing unemployment among blacks. At the time, there was a massive black migration out of the deep south to the northern states. Most were relatively unskilled. These blacks came to the north and began underbidding the more skilled white construction workers. The minimum wage was imposed in order to remove the incentive -- lower cost -- to hire the less skilled black workers.

One other example is "affirmative action". Modern day affirmative action is essentially the granting of special priveleges to certain groups based upon things like skin color because those granting the priveleges thinks thise they are giving them too are inferior and need extra help to compete with the rest of us. Democrats believe that blacks are too stupid to compete fairly unless they are granted special perks to "level the playing field".

Democrats and the media can point the finger at Republicans all they want, but the facts contradict their baseless accusations.

Donaldd
If you ever get curious about what is being left out or added to your MSM, check these links.
I know you are smart enough to know that ALL NEWS can't possibly ALWAYS be good news for Democrats.
Closer examination will show you why Republicans mistrust MSM. Regular close examination shows photos are altered, incidents staged, and outright fabrication of news.
When you see how you have been duped it will not please you much either. If you had been checking during the last Israeli war you would have seen enough to be permanently torqued at MSM.

http://www.mrc.org
http://www.hotair.com
http://www.foxnews.com
http://www.cnsnews.com
http://www.newsmax.com
http://www.newsbusters.org
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/

Trent Lott, Mr. Appeaser
No, not in the vein of Neville Chamberlain.

Sure, he's a senator and compromise is how they do business in the US Senate, but when he was majority leader he was giving the Democrats everything except lap dances.

That's the REAL reason no Republican came to his defense over the Thurmond miscue.

Bush at fault AGAIN??
Donaldd--It is quite stunning to hear how Pres. Bush not only CAUSED Katrina, and every other disaster in this WORLD--you know he brought on the tsunami, too, right?? Well there is not one president who has EVER been so powerful!!! Just think of it---when he is no longer in office, can we dare to think there will be NO more disasters, real or imagined, no more scandals in the senate or house, no more of anything to upset our daily rituals. H-m-m-m-m-m-m-m-m--think on it!!!

beowulfe
Stop confusing liberals with facts. It hurts their heads and messes up some really good rants. They are like 8 year olds who whine and carp and when they have chance at having a sayso, take their toys and go home crying that it's not fair!! There is no debating the likes of Kimberly, r2, or donaaaaald, they are hopelessly lost to reason. Use the scroll wheel when encountering their venomous drivel.

Lott's First Mistake

.....Matt...

.....was apologizing for something that needed no apology....

.....Democrats never apologize (not really)...the Marxist/Libs use apologies as admissions of guilt...just like the Communists always got the accused to sign a confession even though everyone knew he was going to Siberia anyway...

.....it was disgraceful the way fellow Republicans (including the President) ran from Lott as if he had a contagious disease...Republicans have a lot to learn if they want to govern...Remember the Democrats congregating on the Capitol steps to show their support for Clinton after the Monica thing blew up?...I hope that Lott and his fair weather friends have learned a lesson...voting him back as minority whip is a first good step...

.....what Lott should have said when the NAACP and the MSM demanded that he apologize was..."I was paying a compliment to an old friend...I have nothing to apologize for".....COLOSSUS

Matt Towery wrote . . .
that, "[Andrew] Young is far too worldly to purposely participate in racial harangue."

What!?

Young can't mouth more than one sentence without race-baiting. He's cut from the same mold as JJ, Sharpton, and all the rest of the racist blacks.

He's prejudiced against Jews, Koreans and Arabs. Sure, he knows how to talk the slick talk (he's the black "Slick Willie"), but he's no friend of anyone, other than people who have the same skin color he does.

Dishonest Media and Democrats

.....beowulfe...

.....It doesn't matter...a large majority of blacks have bought the Socialist Programs of the Liberal/Marxists and are quite content to be the wards of Big Daddy in Washington...

....forget about blacks goint to the GOP anytime this century.....COLOSSUS

Strom's Daughter

.....When the MSM found out after his funeral...that Thurman had a black illegitimate daughter...they brought her before the cameras and asked her if she resented the fact that Strom had never acknowledged her publically...

.....She said, "No! He was in politics and I knew the way things were back then. He was my father and I loved him"...

....After that the MSM dropped her like a hot potato...they weren't satisfied with just denigrating Strom as a racist and a segragationist in his early years...they wanted to bash him into the grave...when his daughter wouldn't play along...they had no further use for her.....COLOSSUS

merrygoboy
No, YOU don't get it. The 3rd party wannabes are over. All of us have one political collateral--just one, our vote.

You waste your vote when you sanctimoniously refuse to budge on ANYTHING. In the business world, in the ADULT world, it's called being extremely stupid and short sighted. Yes, there are lines you draw, issues that you will not move on but you have to have SOMETHING that you will yield on or you will never get anywhere.

For Bush it is 3 things: the war, taxes, the courts. If the RINOs (you, anyone that deny being Republicans except to tell the Republican party what to do to make YOU happy) had stuck to those 3 issues--as they had in 2004, the GOP would have presented a united front to the 60% independents that make or break elections and the GOP would have swept the midterms and be in a great position to keep the WH in 2008.

But noooooooo, you all had to add the spending (I don't know if you get this but we're in a war...wars are expensive...war time presidents don't normally have great economies, much less cut federal spending.) And the illegal immigration issue (that has been around BEFORE Reagan's time and in the 5 years since 9/11 and REALLY could have waited a few more years).

Tell me something...be honest here...doesn't it bother you the way Bush has had to fight EVERYONE...the MSM, the Dems, Foreign nutty leaders, Cindy Sheehan, Hollywood elite, CIA and FBI "sources", Collin Powell, and then AFTER Bush could no longer run for another term...the RINO press, the so called "base" of RINOs...?

I mean this is not just OUR president...this is a WAR TIME president. You claim to be an American...the back stabbing, no support, whining should ENRAGE you.

Or is calling yourself an "American" another convenient name you use?

Donaldd
You may have some information on this, but I don't recall GW Bush getting into the Trent Lott cat fight. He may have commented on it after the fact, but I can't remember him ever adding any fuel to the fire.

Also find it humorous that you use terms like "the good old days of slavery". Guess you have more in common with Strom than most of us knew. You don't happen to vote in West Virginia do you?

And as far as judging who will make the best stooge, I will bow to your superior knowledge of stooges.

A New and Improved Trent Lott?

.....I have to admit that I wasn't too sorry to see Lott lose his job as majority leader because I thought he was too wimpy and tried too hard to get along with the Democrats...

.....however his replacement (Frist) was worse and really did a lousy job...

.....maybe having spent his time in purgatory...Lott will come back as a better minority whip than he was as Majority Leader.....COLOSSUS

baseballdoc
On the Republicans slow and very feeble attempt to come to Lotts defense, I think a lot of this was self inflicted. The man immediately started to back peddle instead of instead of defending himself. His explainations were all give in a half hearted manner instead of firmness.

It is the Democrats trade mark for everyone else to rush to do your talking for you. Republicans want you to defend your own actions, show them worth defending and then we will lend support. You know, stand on your own two feet.

You step in to pull a dog out of a fight when he's loosing don't expect him to ever learn how to win.

Trent Lott...
is probably a pretty good guy and I like him, but his problem all along was that he was too nice. Being nice to Sen Thurmond got him in trouble, but even before that he was too nice to dems in the senate. I'm sure there was a lot going on behind the scenes that we don't and won't ever know about, but he simply didn't give one confidence that he was going to do anything but play nice with the dems. And like Pres Bush and others have discovered, there simply is no playing nice with dems. You simply have to play hardball and let the chips fall where they may. Libs control the media whther they control anything else or not. And the media is always going to put the republicans under the worst light and the dems under the best light. And the dems have neither honor nor shame and play that advantage for maximum effect.

lewis and young
i do know much about the mayor of atlanta but
young and lewis are and always will be racist.
lewis is still looking for the slaves that
were tossed overboard making the sharks follow
that route till this day.still trying to get
the lunches that the republicans took from the
school childen.
do not try to make them anything else .

Strom's youngest voter
Skip writes: Thursday, November, 16, 2006 1:55 AM

"What really gripes me about this is that Trent Lott got exactly what he deserved. I just saw the clip of what he said at the bash honoring Strom Thurmand. Lott said that he voted for Thurmond when Thurmond ran for President. He went on to say that if Thurmond had been elected we would not have had a lot of the trouble we had in the years following that."

He was just being nice. He did not say he voted for Strom, and he did not vote for Strom.

Trent Lott was 6 or 7 years old when Strom ran for president.

When liberals say questionable things they are given the benefit of the doubt, when conservatives say questionable things the worst possible interpretation becomes the only interpretation allowed.

I am glad Trent Lott is in as whip he and McConnell will certainly be an improvement. Frist was so inept, and I doubt Lamar Alexander would do a better job than Trent Lott.

Worse Than That
Maybe John Lewis' comments were out of line, but perhaps a better example is the media's treatment of the "Honorable" Bob Byrd (D-W.Va.). Byrd was a member of the KKK and even attributes his getting into politics to his taking leadership in that organization. Yet, when I searced Lexus-Nexus, only 15 of the 75 articles on the first three pages of a "Bob Byrd + Ku Klux Klan" actually mentioned this affiliation (or the KKK at all). ALL of the articles in the first three pages of a "Trent Lott + Strom Thurmon" search mentioned Trent Lott's comments. So, according to the mainstream media, its much more horrendous for a conservative politician to pat a 100 year old colleague on the back than for a liberal politician to have been an active, leading member of the KKK. But hey, Democrats are the only ones who care about African-Americans, right? I mean, as long as you're in support of Affirmative Action and relegating an entire segment of the population to a life of government assistance and no personal responsibility (as well as all the other issues Democratic leaders try to play off as "black issues") then a little Klan membership is no big deal.

Insanity102,
How in the world can you connect cops being respected and little boys wanting to be firemen to what Trent Lott said?

Lott stated that there would have been a lot less trouble, or things would have been better if Strom Thurmond had been elected Preasident on a racist, segregationist platform. How do I know that that isn't what Lott meant when he proposed his toast to Thurmond? How do you know it was? Lott didn't say anything remotely connected to the things you mentioned.

You then go on to suggest that I ask myself "why you RINOs and the RINO press has to turn everything into a negative?" I am a RINO? The press is RINO? What universe do you inhabit? Are you off of your medication? Do you know what a RINO is?

Talk about spin, if you stood up after you submittred that asinine post you must have been dizzy. Or perhaps that is your perpetual state of mind.
---------------------------------

Beowulfe, thanks for the history lesson. I have been aware of the facts that you outlined, but seeing it laid out the way you did is helpful. It is too bad that history as it is presented in the schools today, if it is presented at all, will never address that perspective. Too many lefties are teaching for that kind of truth to be diseminated to students.


Odds N Ends
When Andrew Young was first elected to congress from Georgia, he won that election in a majority white district.

Clyde9

DavidMac you're right: You said.....
Thursday, November, 16, 2006 10:47 AM
"Trent Lott, Mr. Appeaser
No, not in the vein of Neville Chamberlain.

Sure, he's a senator and compromise is how they do business in the US Senate, but when he was majority leader he was giving the Democrats everything except lap dances.

That's the REAL reason no Republican came to his defense over the Thurmond miscue."

In addition to that is something people seem to have forgotten. The House of Representatives in 1999(?) braved the slings and arrows of an outraged media by impeaching Clinton (who should have been impeached for treason instead of blow jobs under the Presedential Desk). But the Republican controlled senate, under the "leadership" of Trent Lott refused to try him and make the impeachment stick. It was Lott himself who refused to air the evidence of treason that the media had kept quiet. Lott should have been canned for that, but was instead canned on a verbal gaff. I was happy he got what he deserved, but I hated that it was based on PC idiocy.

Lamar Alexander
Frankly as a fellow Tennessean I was hoping the Senate would elect Lamar Alexander. He ran on a platform of change.

It's about time on both sides of the aisle to boost out the good ole boys (or girls, Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton) from positions of power in the Senate and the House.

To find out more about Senator Alexander go here:

Lamar Alexander
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamar_Alexander

Go to the site for the whole biography.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Senior Senator, Tennessee
Term of office:
2003–Present
Political party: Republican
Preceded by: Fred Thompson
Succeeded by: Incumbent (2009)
Born: July 2, 1940
Maryville, Tennessee
Spouse: Honey Buhler
Religion: Presbyterian

Andrew Lamar Alexander (born July 3, 1940) is the junior United States Senator from Tennessee and a member of the Republican Party. He had previously been the 45th Governor of Tennessee from 1979 to 1987 and U.S. Secretary of Education from 1991 to 1993 under President George H.W. Bush. He received a B.A. Degree from Vanderbilt University in 1962 and a J.D. from New York University Law School in 1965.

Alexander's parents were Andrew Lamar Alexander and the former Genevra F. Rankin. In 1969, he married Leslee K. "Honey" Buhler; the couple have four children: Andrew, Leslee, Kathryn, and William.

Contents

1 Early life
2 Political career
3 Return to Senate
4 Controversy and criticism
4.1 TRACS criticism
5 Notes
6 External links

Lame Lamar
Lamar is a nice guy, too nice in fact. He is not aggressive enough to be in any leadership position. He is not a TRUE conservative, just a go along to get along Republican. His wife is a Betty Ford liberal. I too live in Tennessee and had Lamar for governor.

Solid gold!!
Pricey in the OP opines:

".... you can't really humiliate a liberal - to them there's nothing base, everything is acceptable under the right circumstances (of which they will be the judge) and they will actually just turn up the arrogance."

Priceless quote. I'll have to steal it. You've been warned.

Lott--spineless
Lott has only one problem, and it seems to be pronounced among Repulbicans of late--NO BACK BONE!!! He was a spineless Majority Leader, and a worthless Minority Leader. Tom Daschle, the shameless conniving backstabbing jerk that he was, never the less, was more effective in advancing his adjenda, and styming that of the Republicans as Minority Leader, than either Lott or Frist were as Majority Leader.
For instance if Lott was such a great Majority Leader, why did he cede control to the Democrats, then let Jeffords jump ship. I am not an elected official, but if the Majority Leader is supposed to be such a powerful person, how come Jeffords got away with jumping ship, making Daschle Majority Leader? You will note that Republicans lost all their chairmanships under Daschle. Now for the woulda, coulda, shoulda---"Had I been Majority Leader, when Jeffords jumped ship, he'd have hung from the yardarm". In fact, Had I Been Majority Leader, Daschle would have known better than to even try to make that happen.

skip
Do YOU know what RINO stands for? Republican In Name Only...Since the GOP bashers deny being Republicans but claim to be the base of the party of Republicans...what does that make them?

And if you refuse to call yourself a "Republican" but think you have a God-given right to expect something from the party of the Republicans...what does it make YOU?

And please...don't start with the generic term "Conservative"...that's about a sincere a label as the Liberals calling themselves "Progressive".

What you are is a hard line, 3rd party wannabe...and in the ONLY poll that counts....YOU DIDN'T DELIVER.





merrygoboy . . .
as usual, just doesn't get it.

"Neocon" refers to former liberals who were fed up with the extremest radicalism of the left during the 1960's. They (moderate liberals) didn't want to be called "conservative" so they settled for "neocon".
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.