Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, January 02, 2009
Matt Mayer :: Townhall.com Columnist
The Rove-Bush Reading Contest
by Matt Mayer
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


So, now we can all sleep better at night. We can forget about the six figure losses in our retirement and college education accounts. We can forget about the growing losses in our home equity. We can forget about the lost lives and years we spent in Iraq before the Surge. We can forget about the increasingly disintegrating stability in Afghanistan. We can forget about the runaway federal spending of the last eight years. We can forget about lost Congressional majorities, governorships, state houses, and the wreckage of the conservative movement.

It turns out President George W. Bush is smart. He reads a lot of books. He has averaged sixty-two books a year over the last three years. With everything going on in America and the world, that is what Karl “Permanent Republican Majority” Rove felt we had to know in a recent Wall Street Journal article. Wow.

Not, as one friend chided me, to be too Ann Coulter-ish, but since Rove thought it important enough to waste the valuable space he has each week in the Wall Street Journal to tell us about President Bush’s reading habits, a reaction is warranted. A few caveats are called for:

First, I voted for President Bush twice. Like most conservatives, I wouldn’t vote for an idiot. I am not sure who Rove’s audience was for his piece, but only far left diehards like Frank Rich and Maureen Dowd think the President, whose SAT score and grades bested Al Gore and John Kerry, is a dunce. Nothing Rove says will change their minds.

Next, I put my family’s future where my vote was and moved from Colorado to Washington, D.C. in March 2004 to work for President Bush as a political appointee in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Had he lost the 2004 election, I would have been out of job. As I have often said to my liberal friends who have never voted for a Republican and yet voice “anger” at how the Bush presidency turned out, those of us who actually voted for him and left our outside the Beltway lives to work for him are the ones who have a right to be angry. We are the ones left picking up the pieces of the conservative movement.

Lastly, I am an unrepentant bookphile. I collect books. Read them insatiably. Consider the really good ones friends. I think one of the most important things one can do is read good books. History is packed with lots of lessons we too often forget, so reading serves to remind us of those lessons.

Caveats aside, I am stunned that President Bush has the time to read so many books. While I know the President doesn’t really “run” the country and he has thousands of people working for him to burn both ends of the candle, I guess I always assumed given the schedule of the two secretaries I worked for at DHS that President Bush’s day was packed with telephone calls, meetings, briefings, events, and Oval Office time to read memorandum, briefing papers, and reports. Of course, he has lots of travel time, but what is the point of secure communication equipment and an Air Force One Oval Office if not to continue working?

During his most “productive” year in 2006, he read 95 books, or almost two books per week. He apparently didn’t keep track of 2005. When I left DHS in May 2006, despite my love of reading, I had read one book (“Uncle Tom’s Cabin”) in the previous twenty-six months. I had a four foot stack of back issue periodicals and another three foot stack of the four newspapers I subscribed to, but rarely had time to consistently read. It took me nineteen months to work my way through the backlog. Between daily DHS fires, Hurricane Katrina, and my family, I simply didn’t have time to read – even knowing that some of the lessons in those unread books and periodicals could have helped me formulate better homeland security policy.

Out of curiosity, I asked several colleagues from the upper echelons of corporate America, think tanks, government, and non-governmental organizations how many books they read in 2008. Some in the group actually got paid to read books. Some had kids at home. All lead busy lives. Only one reacted to Rove’s column positively. Of the group, three individuals were able to read between thirty and seventy books, but the rest all read between ten and fifteen books. I managed to read twenty-three books.

According to First Lady Laura Bush, President Bush wakes up at 5:30 AM, eats breakfast and reads the newspaper, and gets to work around 7:00 AM. The Bushes reconvene for dinner at 6:00 PM, watch a movie or read, and then “go to bed early.” Long hours, of course, don’t necessarily translate into a successful presidency. After all, Ronald Reagan was not a night owl and his presidency is rated among the greatest; whereas, Bill Clinton was known to engage in endless policy debates into the wee hours of the night and his presidency is rated as mediocre.

I don’t mean to be mean-spirited or belittle him, but, after all that reading, President Bush ends his presidency having advocated for a $700 billion feckless and opaque federal program and giving inefficient and ineffective Detroit automakers $17 billion so they can survive until Barack Obama and congressional Democrats effectively can nationalize them. It would have been nice had he learned a few lessons from history about massive federal spending programs – they rarely work and come loaded with unintended consequences that tend to do more harm than good.

Like all of us, President Bush needs time to read as he, too, needs to learn the lessons and wisdom contained in books. He also needs downtime to recharge his batteries. Being the president is draining. While it is unfair, one has to wonder how different things might have been had President Bush read half the books on his list and spent the time instead diving a little more deeply into issues like counterinsurgency, financial markets, monetary policy, housing policy, and government spending.

As Roman philosopher Seneca said, “It is quality, rather than quantity that matters.”

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Matt A. Mayer, President & CEO of Provisum Strategies LLC and Adjunct Professor at The Ohio State University, is the author of the book “Homeland Security and Federalism: Protecting America from Outside the Beltway” available in June 2009.

Be the first to read Matt A. Mayer’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
Bush's reading habits
As a lifelong Republican and former Reagan appointee, I have a profound sympathy for Matt Mayer's remonstrance. However, I think no one -- not even Karl Rove -- would be talking about Bush's book list had his presidency ended on a high note instead of the financial markets implosion we all experienced. Does anyone know or care what books George Bush senior read? Byall accounts of the best historians, it si the knowledge, temperament and principles a persons bringsto the job that will determine the success of his actions, not how many of the NY Times bestsellers he can get through in a given month. Any man in high office needs "down time," and if Obama chooses to spend that time playing basketball instead of reading a biography of Peter the Great, more power to him.

Bush's reading habits
Is he counting comic books? I'm highly suspicious of the book-reading claim!

A cheap shot at best.
The $700 billion bailout was only the first downpayment on what will be a much larger cost to stablize the US banking system. If George Bush hadn't done it then the banking system and most of the credit markets would have totally frozen back in September,2008.


The $17 Billion to keep the three US Auto Companies alive till Obama can be inaugurated is just that. A step toward making their needed downsizing and reorganization feasible and the responsibility of the President Elect since he will have to live with the consequences.

Maybe reading a lot of books seems a waste of time to you or an impossible task for a man with so much responsibility but perhaps you have forgotten that maybe he needed a healthy escape at night from the insane level of pressure that comes with the job.

To read the books he claims in several hours of time before you go to sleep at night is not an impossible task. One I can well understand he might need to find solace in with so many of his critics taking endless cheap shots at a man who kept us all safe for seven years after 9/11. Something that everyone forgets but no one expected to have happen.

Still a dunce
How many books did he read prior to 2003 concerning the history of the ME, and specifically, Iraq? Better yet, how much time did he spend thinking about post-war planning?

I know this author is peeved about having to spend $ on American industry (the horror!), but what about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$ spent on foreign wars of choice?

Bush's Reading Habits
Lngstreet OH

Bush's Reading Habits
Longstreet OH
Mr. Rove's column is not to be taken seriously. I am reminded of an anecdote from the heyday of speed reading--a whiz kid was expounding on his ability to zip through "War & Peace" in three days. When asked what the book was about, he replied "It's about Russia" I always severly discount such braggadocio from high profile people. If Bush were in fact reading and COMPREHENDING that volume of books, it's small wonder his Presidency was a complete failure--he had no time for the demands of the office.

Bush is a mental midget ...
Nice try, Matt, but the story just doesn't fly.

Bush is a dangerous combination of arrogance and ignorance. By his own admission, he was a "C" student.

Your efforts to help the Bush Legacy Project only make YOU look foolish. How stupid do you think we are, anyway?

I deserve the dunce award
for defending Bush against all the rabid dems here in L.A.. Face it - our own guy led us into socialism. But first he helped break the bank with a war that got thousands of our guys killed. Instead of any reimbursement we get shoes thrown at us.

That said, the guys calling him an idiot or mental midget are people to ignore.

bizarre
There is something truly silly about thinking the important thing about book reading is quantity. But then the Bush Administration is at its least bad when it is merely silly.

Neal_Bush_from_Silverado
By your definition then Kerry and Gore were also mental midgets. And no one has seen Obama's test scores or transcripts - wonder why?

I'm not sure how old your are, but if you are under forty you were not graded the same way say someone currently in their 50's or 60's was. Grade inflation is the norm.

I think if we look at SAT's we can see that Bush is not stupid. And then there is the fact that he just kept besting the oh so brilliant Democrats and getting everything to go his way.

I am not a Bush supporter -- he's a flaming liberal in my opinion, but to simply call everyone you disagree with stupid says more about you than it does about them.

For those of you who say that you can't
read that many books and still have time for other things I would suggest that either you are not readers or that you use your leisure time for other pursuits.

I work full-time and raise my child without the help of daycare, nannies etc. I alsoi do all the cleaning and errands for my household, and somehow I manage to read about 5 books a week.

Message to LuLu ...
you seem to be quite pompous.

What exactly did I write in my posting that you disagree with? I said Bush is a dangerous combination of arrogance and ignorance. By his own admission, he was a "C" student.

For your information, I'm in my fifties and I voted Constitution Party in '04' and '08. I supported Pat Buchanan in '92, '96, and 2000. Last Republican I voted for was Dole (another version of McCain).

George W Bush has been a disaster as President. This Bush Legacy Project nonsense of spinning how brilliant and decisive he is/was just doesn't fly.

Simply put: Do you think the country is better off than it was 8 years ago?


Neal_Bush_from_Silverado
I suggest you answer your own question on whether we are better off than we were 8 years ago. Remember September 11? I would say that we are much better now, and all indications were that plot began under the noses of the Clinton Keystone Kops, AKA the FBI and Asst AG Jamie Gorelick. So, to be fair, let's ask the question on September 12, 2009.

As far as the economy, Bush's real problem is that he went along with the Democrats who ran the Senate for 4 of his 8 years (Daschle and Reid) and had help like John McCain to beat back the liberal insanity. The result is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac along with Democrat strongholds like the financial houses killed the economy. And in the meantime, Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Chucky Schumer stonewalled legislative changes to oversight. So, Neal_Bush_from_wherever, congratulate your buddies on a tremendous October Surprise, which was tanking the economy. Nuff said.

FLAT OUT LIARS

Reminds me of the story Bush told about watching BOTH airliners crash into both Trade Towers...

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/04/se.04.html

"...you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

There was no footage of the first plane hitting until the next day. He cannot have seen anything


FLAT OUT LIARS
Reminds me of the story Bush told about watching BOTH airliners crash into both Trade Towers...

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/04/se.04.html

"...you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

There was no footage of the first plane hitting until the next day. He cannot have seen anything like what he described.


Pointless Column
I see absolutely no point to this column. There is no indication Bush's reading was a detriment to his presidency or decision making, or that not reading would have made his decision making better. This being the case, why did Mr. Mayer write this waste of space?

And for those who don't believe Bush reads as prolifically as stated, I refer you to Teddy Roosevelt. As president, TR would read two to five books per day. That's right, between seven hundred to eighteen hundred books per year.

Now, I'm not a big Bush fan, but I'm pretty sure he's smart enough to read approximately 3.5% to 5.5% of the books TR would read per year.

jo: you're the liar
How the hell does that remind of you the story Bush told? I watched the footage of both planes hit on that day. I remember it as if it were yesterday.

I don't know if I quite agree with the author of this article, but I'll at least concede that Bush seems to have been reading the wrong books. Whether he had the time to read as many as he claims really depends on how quickly he reads them. I read mostly for enjoyment and tend to read fairly slowly, but I get through technical books rather quickly. The president has a lot of staff to attend to things that most mortals need to do themselves. No surprise at all that he should find time to read, and the president has a fair amount of pressure and needs to unwind somehow.

POST OFFICE TO ISSUE BARACK OBAMA.....?
THE MEDIA CLAIMS OBAMA IS THE SMARTEST, MOST POPULAR, MOST EVERYTHING PRESIDENT. NOW THE POST OFFICE IS GETTING INVOLVED. READ IT AT, http://stopthepresses2.blogspot.com/2009/01/post-office-to -issue-barack-obama.html

Readers are Leaders
Reading is actually going to school.....and is mental discipline. If someone reads, that indicates he/she is curious.....which is the number one indicator of success. I don't agree with every decision that President Bush made, but we have been kept safe from terrorism in our land, we do have two more strict-constructionist Supreme Court Justices, we have had a President who is genuine and professional and treated the Presidency as it should be treated.....with humility, awe, and an understanding that compromises are a part of the landscape)

And.....I, personally, was gratified to read in Rove's article that President GW Bush reads through the Bible every year and reads devotions every day.

Yeah, but *what* did he read?
Because great literature, history, or political philosophy are one thing, and mass market thrillers or fluff are another. I'm not impressed if the man read through the complete works of John Grisham.

Just What Was He Reading?
Exactly what was he reading, certainly not the U.S. Constitution or American history. He may be reading, but it appears his comprehension could use a little work. Insofar as this writer's reference to being in the beltway working for DHS, I think he should have gotten off the beltway and headed down to Arizona and personally starting working on the fence back in 2000, maybe it would be finished. Instead his Department, in Bush's last 100 days in office, granted VISA waivers to over 34 countries for online VISA clearances with less than 24 hours security checks. Now THAT is Homeland Security alright. I'd like a tax refund, please for the past eight years of this travesty of an administration and Congress, and Department of Homeland Security. In fact, I have a great many medical bills now that I have insomnia since my former Governor, who had those 9/11 pilots also right under her nose while AG in Arizona, and has fought the border fencing every step of the way, is now going to be in charge of domestic security for the entire country. I filed my claim, and it should be on her desk as soon as she takes her oath of office.

Karl Rove is a Marketer
Rove is a marketer and will say anything that might get him a little attention. He works for Murdoch now, as that other media hound, Bill O'Reilly, and spins the truth just as readily.

CORRECTION
Since the DHS wasn't created until 9/11 (another big government increase in bureaucracy that was hardly necessary) I misspoke. As soon as that Department was created it's first mission should have been getting our borders security. We were in a foreign war with a wide open back door, which has victimized the border state residents in terrorism from drug traffickers and murderers for years, and it took a 9/11 to get any of the other states to begin to notice. Do you wonder why the drug use and trafficking in the Midwest have increased since the 70's....the open southern borders are the reason. And DHS just threw open the gates wider, with Bush giving his appeasement speech in the Rose Garden, supposedly because there were so many complains from foreigners about the delays for their business trips. Just wait until the CAFTA countries are included under Napolitano. You think the drug problem is bad now, just watch.

#3
Those banks didn't need a bailout. Please go to OpenSecrets.org. The banks that were claiming financial ruin actually are the owners of the Federal Reserve. Congress's approval ratings are so low that most couldn't finance their own campaigns so took out interrest bearing loans from Morgan Stanley, Lehrman Brothers and Chase...which actually are the owners of the Federal Reserve itself. They simply took out loans through campaign donations and then billed the tab to the American people painting themselves as saviors of Joe Citizen's 401(k). It was the latest in the creative skirting around the weak campaign finance laws...and both Obama and McCain took part.

Wake up.

Better Off
We would all be better off right now if Bush had read "The Road to Serfdom" and stooped right there.

Correction
Stopped, of course, not "stooped".

strange
I find it strange that George Bush takes the blame for everything. It sounds to me like the majority of people on this thread do not know how their own government works.
George Bush probably did read a lot of books. For you people out there that think it is impossible to read that many books, do not read books. The fact is George Bush is very intelligent. He flew jet fighters in the
Air Guard and unforgiving ones at that. Military pilots have to know much more than the average pilot to fly high performance jets. They do not let stupid people fly those jets. It is only common sense.
People seem to forget that the congress has been run by the Democrats for the last two years. They have been in charge of the purse strings not the President. The Republicans have never held a super majority in any house when they came into power back in the nineties. George Bush made his mistakes by reaching across the isle to the Democrats. If a bill did not have socialism in it they would not vote on it and there were enough republican former democrats to effect the way spending bills were drafted and passed. The President had to sign those bills to get the funding he needed to prosecute a war. In effect he had to take a poison pill.

Gross exaggeration
Those who work for presidents like to portray their boss as a genius, with the implication that they themselves are surely great thinkers, too. According to one of his Whitehouse staff, Jack Kennedy had a photographic memory that allowed him to memorize an encyclopedia volume by simply thumbing through the pages. Clinton aides report he would work NY Times crossword puzzles, in ink, while a roomful of experts discussed arcane details of trade policy, and then astound the group by drawing brilliant conclusions that never occurred to nobody else. Just as Democrats like to believe those stories, lots of Republicans will believe Bush read 95 weighty books during one year of his presidency.

To Semperfi/par
Well said.

Unfortunately 99% of the people (especially voters) are "LOGIC & KNOWLEDGE" disadvantaged. Furthermore whatever "KNOWLEDGE" they get is from even "DUMBER" newspaper editorials and/or from a "VERY BIASED ACADEMIA"; remember William Ayers is a tenured Professor in a State University in Illinois.

Most "MEDIA IDIOTS and ACADEMIA MORONS" hated George W. Bush because he was far far more intelligent than all of them put together.

Semperfi/par
The problem with Bush all along has not been intelligence but ideology. He is not a conservative so was not guided by principles that would have put him at odds with the liberals in congress. He had a Republican majority for years and had he pushed a conservative agenda would have been successful.

Going to the people and being able to articulate the reasons behind vetoing all the BS sent to him by congress would have worked. He actually was pushing for expansion of the welfare state. There were not enough conservatives within the Republican party to deny what he wanted.

Government has grown dramatically under Bush because he pushed for it. We are in worse shape now than when he became president and for that he bears a great responsibility.

Mayer column on Pres. Bush's reading
Mr. Mayer, it's too bad your insider position in a tumultuous presidency has left you bitter and struggling to find fault. I'm thankful we had the leadership of a fine man who kept us free and safe, waged a war to free foreigners from tyranny, and did what he could to alleviate social and economic ills which were put in place before his terms. Now that you are back in academia and consulting, I hope you will be able to regain your perspective---without going over to the viewpoints typical of your resumed professional connections.It may be that President Bush's extensive reading has contributed to his grasp of what was really important: to defend our country and the people who live here. This he has done, and many of us can see it clearly. Your essay reveals pique that a non-academic has been intruding on your preserves, but history may find that President Bush, well-read and broadly humane in his actions,was the President we needed at this time.

b
Do you honestly believe that expanding the size and cost of government at a time the exact opposite should have been pushed for was a good thing?

Bush and Books
Matt Mayer was in the Department of Homeland Security, fighting the war on terrorism on our side?

Vocabulary
An "unrepentant bookphile" would, at some point, probably have come across the word "bibliophile", making the nonce coinage "bookphile" unnecessary.

On the other hand, I suppose I should be thankful for being spared "bookaholic".

5 books a week?
Lulu claims to work full time, and be full time mom and errand runner. AND she claims to read 5 books a week.

I do not believe that. 5 books a week would be difficult if you did nothing else, let alone breathe, eat, and sleep.

you need to prove this. Unless you are skimming the books, it's not happening.

I suspect that is the case for Bush. If he reads that many, and I don't believe he does. Rove was just yakking, But if Bush is reading non-fiction, oftimes they can be skimmed through very quickly. In one sitting, in an hour or less.

thank you Semperfi
Bush gets blamed for every little thing. When Clinton was president, and anything went "wrong," we were told, "well, the President doesn't really have power. He's more of a figurehead, really."

Bush even gets blamed for hurricanes. I pray that history will be kind to Bush and the years ahead will show what a good leader he actually was.

Missed "Hurricane Response for Dummies?"
Theory:
Most common lie for men: height.
Most common lie for women: age.
Most common lie for men and women: books read.

Thomas Andres
Sierra foothills

Taking the Challenge
After Reading Rove's article, I too felt compelled to take on the book challenge. Even if I only read ten books, it's more than none. I too started with "Uncle Tom's Cabin."

Bush Books
It is claimed that Bush averaged sixty-two books a year over the last three years. Did he read the contents or just the titles? I am willing to believe that he is reasonably smart but not willing to believe that his governance was smart.

President Reagan's favorite author was Louis Lamour; hardly a profound read. On the other hand, President Reagan's governance was replete with ingrained wisdom.

Too Smart to Be That Clueless

Re Karl Rove's column, "Bush Is a Book Lover": That George W. Bush is smart and well-educated is a fact. No matter one's opinion of Yale and Harvard, you've got to have something on the ball to have negotiated those institutions as Mr. Bush has.

So it's totally incomprehensible that, as recounted on page 260 of the 9/11 Commission Report that Pres. Bush would have interpreted as "historical in nature" the Aug. 6, 2001 report contained in that day's Presidential daily Brief (PDB). According to the 9/11 Report, Mr. Bush had been well aware of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden. So much so that he had directed the CIA to advise him whether the threats which abounded during the summer of 2001 pointed to an attack upon the United States.

In response, two CIA analysts via the 8/6/01 PDB warned the President that "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." was "CURRENT AND SERIOUS." How could Pres. Bush possibly have interpreted that dire warning to be "historical in nature?"

Conservative journalist James Pinkerton on April 9, 2004, in his column, "Pre-9/11 Doings Are Coming to Light," wrote, "President George W. Bush got a blunt warning five weeks before Sept. 11 and he did little or nothing."

Pinkerton, who worked in the White House under Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, also wrote, "Plenty of people in Washington had their 'hair on fire' about the terror threat in the summer of 2001. But not Bush, apparently. On Aug. 4, he went off on a working vacation to his ranch in Texas." To read books with Karl Rove, no doubt.

Didnt know ...
what he didnt know. And boy did he (Bush) have much to learn. Mayer offers us an honest introspection to a certain enlightenment in the Bush entourage. I suspect Rove will be, like Nixon, the last wall to crack and be the highest paid to do it.
As a person who has worked in manufacturing the last thirty years (you talk about uphill!) and having three companies go from under me due to trade policies or bad management (same thing, same result), I can relate to Mayer's 'enlightenment'.
So as I go forth and finish my third academic degree to gain more 'enlightenment', I wish Mr Bush well as he labors on doing the research for his upcoming cash-in book writing. I wonder what Mr. Bush read ten months ago? I think that was when the light came on and Bush has made decisions for the country instead of the neocon party.

Bush bashing.
A National past time.
We are going to have to listen to this incessant Bush bashing crap for at least another four years when the Liberal News Media blames Bush for all of Obamas screw ups.

Bob, No
MSM is a for profit business. You know, the god that conservative thought bows to.
The one who will be making money on his mistakes is Bush. The estimate on Bushes first book is $10mil. Karl Rove - $15.
Guess who is being hunted most? Rove will be the center of attention for generations.
The media that you call home has already moved on.

President Bush should put down thel
book he's reading and pick up the complete report from his prosecutor buddy, the Border Patrol, witnesses FOR Ramos and Compean, a random hadful of TH comments starting in 2006, the investigations done by FAIR, Numbers USA, the Free Ramos & Compean groups, etc. etc.

His cursory "I had the Justice Dept. study the matter, and they concurred with the court's lawful decidion." was balderdash.

Oh, come on. Pardon the guys. Why not? Afraid the New York Times might write an ugly editorial about it?

MARTIN LUTHER'S READING WISDOM
When it comes to reading, Mr. Bush would have been well advised to heed Martin Luther's advice. Luther told his disciples one day while chatting with them that they should not read a large number of books. Rather should they read a small number of the very best books many times in order to master their extremely helpful, wise contents.

Had Mr. Bush read Ann Coulter, Pat Buchanan, Larry Elder and a few others of like mind repeatedly over the years, I suspect he would have had a vastly different presidency. He would have made far fewer serious mistakes and many more wise decisions.

Reading too many books gives us a traffic jam in our brains with much too much undigested information sloshing around in there leading to what I call "fried brain syndrome." Our brains cannot take the abuse anymore, so they call in sick or go on strike with picket signs and loud noises. When it happens to us, it is not particularly crucial, but when it happens to our president, it is a calamity of the first water.

Mr. Bush is not stupid as many believe; he is simply trying to deal unsuccessfully with far too much information developed from constant speed reading and little or no reflection or re-reading. His greatly abused brain has been on strike for at least three years and probably much longer. That explains an awful lot, doesn't it?

reply to #11 LULU five books a week
Must be cheap paperback romantic novels. Nothing worth retaining,,,,

Bush bashing.
A National past time.
We are going to have to listen to this incessant Bush bashing crap for at least another four years when the Liberal News Media blames Bush for all of Obamas screw ups.

Spead reading
Spead reading has been good to Bush and Rove but not to us. Thanks for the info Karl.
While Bush should have been using the bully pulpit to inform and lead he was speed reading
Wow I'm impressed! If only those idiot demos had run someone besides Kerry in 04 we may have been spared the last Bush term.

No$
So Rove and Bush are going to make money from their books, more power to them. Envious are you? Some body has to make money so you can tax the hell out of them. Think about all the people that are indirectly going to make money from these books. You don't want to hear about that do you? You would rather they donate all the proceeds to your favored charity the Government. How much has sleek Willy ( Hillay) amassed from books and speaking engagements and nefarious dealings with the Saudis and other foreigners since he left the Presidency? Last I heard it was about $500 million.

Reading About The Border Wars
If the president read that many books,he was reading when he should have been involved in the present.

Reading books is fine in your leisure,but he had too many irons in the fire that demanded attention.

He should have been looking at the consequences of the open borders and the harm it is causing and will cause in the future.

No one in real power cares about closing the borders. They are all One World People and will do what it takes to get there. Even at our expense.

Bob its ok
I dont care if Rove Bush make money. I wont buy the book. And I dont have the power to tax anyone, I am not a county, state or country. Why did you respond so defensively? The printers and marketing people will make money from the books. But arent they the same as the msm? Book printers are notoriously leftist. My point is that the world is symbiotic, without a liberal there can be no conservative, without a capitalist there can be no socialist. The point of Mayers article was that Bush has made lots of mistakes and he will write books, but you seem to think that it is Bush's right to profit from misjudgement in office. I Dont. And dont hand out the next line about Clinton again, he was impeached and it cost him quite a bit. Your comparison is a weak defense. And may I quote you:" A National past time. We are going to have to listen to this incessant Bush bashing crap for at least another four years..". While looking in the mirror substitute Bush for Clinton.
I am not going to do that. When Bush leaves office I will stop, until then hunker down cause it is pile on time.

EDUCATING A WILL-OF-THE-WISP PRESIDENT
Many years ago Maggie Thatcher realized that her education was not sufficient in all areas to equip her to lead her country extraordinarily well. Since she was truly an intelligent lady, she hired expert tutors to come in daily to instruct her in everything she needed to know. Tutoring is much more effective than reading books because a tutor can get right to the needed information and make sure his student fully understands every aspect by interacting in-depth with it. As we all know, it worked tremendously well for Mrs. Thatcher.

Of course, Mr. Bush could have done the same thing and that greatly to his advantage, but instead he took extraordinarily bad advice from Karl Rove and fried his own brain with too much unassimilated information from speed reading vastly, vastly, vastly too many books--and many mindlessly unhelpful ones at that by all indications.

Not having been able to develop strong convictions as to either conservative or liberal political and economic principles, Mr. Bush simply went with the prevailing winds of sentiment and lousy advice on everything. This was clearly demonstrated again ad nauseam when he admitted going against conservative principles recently by bailing our the auto companies with 17 billion of our stolen dollars.

Mr. Bush had an extremely rare opportunity to do great good for our nation. However, he largely squandered it because he did not know what most people would consider an unimportant thing--how to gain in-depth understanding and wisdom about important things. Too late now and too bad.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.