Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, March 02, 2007
Matt Barber :: Townhall.com Columnist
Planned Parenthood: Dialing for death
by Matt Barber
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With unemployment at 10.2%, what will happen by the end of Obama's first term?



Although it’s a sound concept in terms of fundraising techniques, Planned Parenthood’s latest scheme to profit off the backs of young, impressionable women by sacrificing their children to the god of convenience reminds us once again that it’s not so much about a woman’s sacred “right to choose” as it is about the abortion industry’s unholy “rite to schmooze.”

In a recent press release, Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) announced that it would be “giving customers the power to make a difference with every [cell phone] call they make.” Tragically, however, when Planned Parenthood talks about making a difference, we know it’s the difference between life and death.

In what it bills as “a unique wireless [cell phone] program that enables consumers to choose where their mobile phone dollars go without sacrificing quality service,” the abortion Goliath – already enjoying an annual budget of nearly one billion dollars – boasts that the plan “will provide an impressive 10% of revenues generated directly to PPFA, transforming a simple phone call into a personal act of support.”

The abortion provider innocuously calls the fundraising effort “Planned Parenthood Wireless.” The cheerful tone of the press release is uncanny. Read between the lines, and it shamelessly chirps: “you make a call, we kill a baby.” And in light of the many acts of abortion violence Planned Parenthood commits each year, “Dialing for Death” is a more fitting banner.

But the latest 411 on Planned Parenthood’s money lust only underscores the fact that the organization already benefits tremendously from a government mandated, taxpayer boondoggle.

Addressing Planned Parenthood’s new venture into telecommunications, Wendy Wright, President of Concerned Women for America, said, “Planned Parenthood constantly demands more tax dollars, even though they already make money from charging for their services, corporate grants, aggressive mailings, fundraisers and other revenue streams. This newest marketing ploy provides evidence that Planned Parenthood is capable of making lots of money, and taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize Planned Parenthood and their hefty salaries,” said Wright.

But somehow, Planned Parenthood’s latest fundraising ploy just seems to smack of tasteless arrogance. It’s not that the concept is illegitimate, but rather that the dark nature of the organization employing the concept makes it creepy and unseemly.

And the fact that “Planned Parenthood Wireless” offers a “family plan” drips with morbid irony. In view of the group’s twisted interpretation of “family” and the millions of lives it snuffs out each year (fueled by that phantom “right” to unfettered abortion on demand), this plan will apparently have no need for roll over minutes, and every dropped-call will amount to a precious life spared.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
J. Matt Barber is Director of Cultural Affairs with Liberty Counsel and also serves as Associate Dean with Liberty University School of Law.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
small mass of 2...16 cells.
"But I don't see how you can accept a 2-cell organism as a full human- how about when there are identifiable fingers and toes? That sounds like a human much more than a small mass of 2, 4, 8, 16 cells, etc."

Well, the fact that the "small mass [of] cells" is a human being is a biological fact. So the question is whether or not such a human being should be protected.

When you take a look at a 7 week (Most surgical abortions happen at 8 and 9 weeks.) pre-born baby, you see arms, legs, hands, eyes, etc. You see a miniture human being. A lady at work told me that she was ok with abortion until she saw a 7 week embryo. This is because it's easier for us to identify with someone who looks like us. This gives us an emotional attachment to that little person.

Now, when someone doesn't look like us, we find it more difficult to relate to that person. Your comments confirm this. But remember this is exactly the philosophy behind racism and bigotry. "They don't look like us." Therefore, they can be exploited and trampled upon.

How do I call a human who looks like a "small mass [of] cells" my equal? By realizing that we shouldn't base human rights on appearance.

Proud Lib
"The 'public shaming' is an extrapolation "

In other words, you just made up out of thin air. Then you continue your tripe about condoms. You discredit yourself by attacking views that none of us are pushing. Go find someone who claims condoms are wrong and argue with her instead. Fair?

"How about all the eggs that are sloughed off when they don't get fertilized?"

Eggs aren't human beings. At conception, a change occurs and until that change occurs there is no human being present. Biology 101.

"I can't equate a fertilized egg with a full-term baby"

Why not? You have to admit that a newly conceived embryo is a human being. Not admitting it would make you look foolish or completely ignorant. So what is difference between a newborn human and an embryonic human that you see as morally relevent?

"through comprehensive and honest sex education"

Yes, including a complete scientifically accurate portrayal of human development in the womb. When people see for themselves the humanity of the unborn, it makes them understand that abortion is wrong.

"a better world for women and children"

Women and children have never had it better than they have it in America and yet, we kill 1.3 million unborn babies every year.

"liberals do support personal responsibility."

that's tripe. Abortion is avoiding responsibility by killing an invited guest.

"However, I'm not going to hold up pregnancy as a punishment for irresponsible behavior"

You obviously don't understand the difference between punishment and natural consequence. Pregnancy is not a punishment but a natural consequence of sex. What do you think is the basis of parental obligation?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.