Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Mary Katharine Ham :: Townhall.com Columnist
Economics is for Lovers
by Mary Katharine Ham
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


The following article is from the February issue for Townhall Magazine.  To subscribe to twelve issues of Townhall Magazine and receive a free copy of Andrew McCarthy’s Willful Blindness:  A Memoir of a Jihad, click here

The love story of Milton and Rose Friedman is one like few others.

“During Milton’s and my honeymoon, I completed drafts of my Ph.D. thesis on the contributions to capital theory by Longfeld and Senior,” Rose once recounted.

Theirs was a marriage that was more monetary policy than mushy anniversary cards, more inflation theory than intrigue, but that didn’t keep it from being “something of a fairy tale,” in Milton’s words.

As luck and the alphabet would have it, young Milton Friedman was seated next to Rose, director in a Price and Distribution Theory class at the University of Chicago in 1932. The seating arrangement created one of the most important partnerships in the history of economics.

They were married June 25, 1938. Between that day and Milton’s death in 2006, it’s hard to overstate the impact they had on 20th-century economics and the cause of liberty, turning the first half of the century’s Keynesian statism on its head with a simple idea—“the promotion of human freedom.”

After a short period of Keynesianism for both, which they have attributed to a combination of the spirit of the times and youthful indiscretion, each embraced free-market libertarianism when libertarianism was decidedly uncool.

They believed fervently in freedom and free markets, not just for their efficiency, but for their morality. The “deregulation of industry and private life to the fullest extent possible” was their goal, and their unwavering focus on it in the big-government enamored Great Society made them an oddity.

They argued for school choice in the 1950s, were early supporters of an all-volunteer military, and argued for limitations and accountability in government spending long before the Bridge to Nowhere was a twinkle in Ted Stevens’ appropriating eye. Milton’s arguments for competition for the postal service makes him the intellectual father of FedEx.

The Friedmans persevered and eventually their original ideas and enthusiastic communication of them turned what was once deemed drastic into the eminently sensible. In the 1960s, Richard Nixon declared, “We are all Keynesians now,” as if Keynesian economics were an immutable fact of existence, but by 1980, the Friedmans had helped change the facts and what had been “radical” became the rule in Reagan’s America and Thatcher’s Britain.

***

This article is from the February issue for Townhall Magazine.  To subscribe to twelve issues of Townhall Magazine and receive a free copy of Andrew McCarthy’s Willful Blindness:  A Memoir of a Jihad, click here.

***

Milton often said that economists are not made, they’re born—trained or not, there are certain people who simply understand the principles innately.

For those who aren’t natural economists, Milton and Rose Friedman were eager teachers. Their 1980 book Free to Choose was the best-selling non-fiction book of the year. Both the book and the PBS series of the same name have been translated into more than a dozen languages.

The power of their teachings lies in the Friedmans’ ability to communicate, not like academics, but like storytellers. Milton uses the simple story of a pencil’s production to explain how free markets not only “promote productive efficiency, but…foster harmony and peace among the peoples of the world.” He sits outside the last working one-room schoolhouse in Vermont to illustrate how loss of parental control leads to failing schools in the New England countryside and the inner city alike.

Rose, who George W. Bush once jokingly called the “only person to ever win an argument with Milton,” was co-author on several of his books and a collaborator on all of his projects. In a 2006 interview with the Wall Street Journal, they were asked whether their both being economists had helped their marriage:

Rose (nodding affirmatively): “Uh-unh. But I don’t argue with him…very much.”
Milton (guffawing): “Don’t believe her! She does her share of arguing…”
Rose (interrupting): “…and I’m not competitive, so I haven’t tried to compete with you.”
Milton (uxoriously): “She’s been very helpful in all of my work. There’s nothing I’ve written that she hasn’t gone over first.”

From their newlywed days as renegade free-market economists, studying all night and sleeping late, to their days as international celebrities and public intellectuals discussing “consumption function” by the evening fire, the Friedmans were optimistic about their mission.

Both children of Jewish immigrant families from Eastern Europe, they faced persecution both for their religious and academic beliefs, but used the freedom America afforded them to inspire dissidents behind the Iron Curtain they had escaped. After the Curtain came down, Dick Armey once asked an Eastern European leader how his country had enacted a free-market society so quickly. He responded simply: “We read Milton Friedman.”

On Milton’s 90th birthday in 2002, longtime Friedman acolyte Donald Rumsfeld offered a tribute to the couple in which he suggested that the title of their 1998 joint memoir, Two Lucky People, ought to have been reversed.

“We indeed are the lucky ones and have benefited from the lifetime of collaboration,” he said.

Milton was once asked whether there is a romantic side to the study of economics, as there is with the study of history or literature. “No, I don’t think so,” he replied, but his own story gives lie to his answer.

Once upon a time, Milton and Rose Friedman fell in love, worked hard for what they believed, and changed the world. What’s more romantic than that?

This article is from the February issue for Townhall Magazine.  To subscribe to twelve issues of Townhall Magazine and receive a free copy of Andrew McCarthy’s Willful Blindness:  A Memoir of a Jihad, click here.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Mary Katharine Ham is a contributor to Townhall Magazine.

Be the first to read Mary Katharine Ham's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

ANYBODY CATCH CAVUTO??
Neil Cavutto had Mitt Romney on today..and he came on real strong about eliminating all this bull of sending billions of dollars to foreign countries that build resorts with our tax monies and this country is in deep debt! Romney knows economy..big time! Mitt says spend it here on american needs!
elvis

Kris Kristofferson
Freedom's another word for nothing left to lose. For moral economics you need a few laws and regulations. Corporate raiders have proven disastrous for stockholders, employees and pensioners. The environment also suffers when guidelines are not set, take auto safety in the last 40 years, each year there are more cars on the roads but fewer deaths. Go figure, Nader came in handy for something. When it comes to the economy neither theory will work 100%. It takes careful balance to walk the tightrope, people parish with one false step.

Some Flunked Friedman Economics
I did a search and discovered that Milton Friedman won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976. He certainly deserved it for his teachings benefitted the entire world. Sadly, there was one powerful group that ignored his theories and continue to ignore them--leaders and members of the Democrat Party.

high school economics
ALL high school economics classes should teach the Friedman's economics. It is easy enough to understand. The students would use this class
for their entry life.

hitchhiker
I couldn't have said that better myself.

Trickle down
I get furious when I hear basic economics branded as "trickle down". There are really only two ways wealth is distributed through a society, naturally by market forces, or artificially through some kind of "central planning". The proponents of Socialism continue to push their discredited theories by denegrating the other viewpoints.

We would all benefit from a higher economic IQ. Maybe if our so-called leaders read more of the Friedmans' work some common sense might "trickle down" into their heads.

Milton & Rose - Freedom's Lighthouse
Always a pleasure to read anything by or about the Friedman's. Their writings are the guiding lighthouse for Freedom!

Marx?
The very antithesis of Friedman. The guy who gave us the economic fallacies of economic and social slavery that the left has bought into and uses to screw up this country on a daily basis... That Marx an intellectual giant?
Or are you referring to Groucho?
That I can buy.

Milton Friedman
Along with with other 20th century intellectual giants like Freud, Marx and Einstein,Friedman and his wife were great students of Economics and excelled in teaching the logical illogical science, so many of us, in our own self interest could see the wonderous movement of the "invisable hand". We were so blessed by their presence and if their love affair contributed to their understanding and teaching, they are role models to emulate.

A Ton of Love and enough Money!!!


You talk about love and economics, here is a story about the most possible love, and enough economics to finance a wonderful 55 years.

===============

A Sweetie shopping delay, was a synonym for momentary.

===============

When Sweetie was shopping, my rule was; If my Sweetie wants it, I will buy it.

I am lucky that the only really, for real, actual, ridiculous item Sweetie ever wanted, was me.

============

Sweetie was shopping for a dress on the Isle of Capri, and offered a price.

The dress salesman indicated agreement, then quickly kissed Sweetie on the neck and said “Bella, Bella.”

But when she indicated a lack of interest in what he was really trying to sell, he showed a lack of interest in selling the dress for that price, so no buy, and no sale either.

==============

For Sweetie's 50th birthday I gave her 50 tiny pieces of gold, and 50 small emeralds, in a glass vial, held by a chain.

For her 70th birthday I had a necklace with 70 stones made especially for her.

================

Sweetie and I knew each other for a total of exactly 55 years and 13 days.

My Sweetie passed away from complications of Alzheimer's disease.

Her illness lasted nearly 9 years, with me as her nurse, the last few years on 24 hour duty.


1udagudguys
I know what ya mean. But, what tingles too many other people sends shivers down my spine. The ample evidence of the triumph of Friedmanism over Keynesianism is ignored by so many as the forces of politics push us ever deeper into the Keynesian morass of socialism. The government cannot spend us into prosperity libs. No one can possibly plan anything nearly as efficient as the free market creates. Give it up already. Stop allowing politicians to capitalize on your ignorance. Be like that Eastern European official and read Milton Friedman. Okay. Lecture over. Liberals, you can go back to chanting we are the change we have been waiting for. Woohoo.

Very good article MKH
Another insightful article!

The Friedmans were a great testament to what you can accomplish if you use the freedoms you have in this country wisely. Everyone has the same clean slate either the day they are born here or the day they arrive. What you do with your time and engery is entirely up to you!

I get a tingle down my leg ...
... any time someone speaks about the Friedmans.

Well writ stuff.

MKH
A better title would be "Capitalism is For Lovers; Communism is For Haters".

Milton Friedman

Thank you for reprinting this. Imagine, an intellectual love affair for the betterment of mankind. Now that is what marriage is all about.

To bad a large portion of our population doesn't understand that the longevity of their marriage lent to the depth and breadth of their success. They were free to choose and they choose each other and we all benefited from their decision.


Economics is for lovers
I know, that is the first thing I said when I took Economics in college.

How about that supply and demand? Mmm hmm. And then you can, ahem, lower those...

taxes, woohoo! That won't cause inflation, but something will get bigger!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.