Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
Mary Katharine Ham :: Townhall.com Columnist
In Defense of 'Kid Nation'
by Mary Katharine Ham
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


I must admit my outrage trigger is not as sensitive as some people’s. But, you would think, when it comes to child abuse, I’d get upset pretty quickly, right?

And yet, when people started yelling “child abuse,” “child neglect,” and “child labor” over CBS’s new series, “Kid Nation,” I just couldn’t get that angry.

If you’ve somehow managed to miss the story—which would be quite an accomplishment at this point—CBS had 40 kids out in a New Mexico ghost town this summer to film a reality show in which the children, ages 8-15, were to build their own society, compete for prizes, bicker, befriend, and of course, be filmed.

CBS is now under fire because, due to some serious mistakes on the network’s part (and allegations that it tried to conceal those mistakes by deflecting inspectors), the production may have fallen afoul of New Mexico’s child labor laws. There were also four injuries on set. One little girl, whose mother has filed a complaint against CBS, was splashed with grease while cooking. Three other kids were treated after ingesting small amounts of bleach from an unmarked bottle. None of the injuries were serious, and they were all treated promptly.

So, why am I not outraged? Isn’t this a blatant example of our Hollywood-ized culture asking kids to grow up too quickly and endangering them for a cheap TV thrill? It’s obvious, isn’t it? Nah, I don’t think so.

First, there’s the question of the law. The state’s attorney general is investigating, and if CBS broke the law, it will pay the price. And, it should.

CBS’s mistake is amplified by the fact that it seems “Kid Nation” could have been exempted from the child labor laws it’s now accused of breaking had it applied to be exempted as New Mexico’s summer camps do each year. If it weren’t for the legal loophole, Boy Scout camps like the rugged Philmont could not operate because carrying wood, cleaning campsites, and the like would be considered labor.

CBS messed up, but the chorus of folks calling the show “revolting” and “abusive” is a little much. The headlines are fraught with pathos and hand-wringing hell-in-a-handbasket predictions for our society: “Who’s to blame for Kid Nation?,” “Who thought this was a good idea?,” “Kid Nation could spell disaster for reality genre.”

So what did the kids do in “Kid Nation?” They carried water, cleaned outhouses, cooked their own food, and attended town meetings. They governed and bartered, identified problems and fixed them.

Each of their parents signed a contract that allowed them to participate in the extreme experience. Another batch of headlines has screamed, “What were the parents thinking?” Here’s what one parent had to say:

“I know I speak for most of the parents when I say we are just mystified by this uproar and I guess it’s because people like to read sensational headlines,” Lori said.

Lori told Access that she and the other parents are angry that media outlets, to whom they have granted interviews, continue to focus on the negative. “Every time they show them, they cut out anything that might put the show in a good light, and it was such an amazing experience for these kids,” she said. “We really are so mystified by it. My daughter has nothing but great things to say about it. They had the time of their lives. I’m perplexed.”

I don’t think I’m crazy to wager that probably more of the parents feel this way than not.

If you flip through the kids’ bios on the “Kid Nation” page, you’ll find they’re from all over the country. They’re thoughtful, they’re interesting, they’re country and city, red state and blue state. I particularly like a 10-year-old girl who cited Jimmy Carter as one of the worst presidents because he “gave away the Panama Canal.” So young, yet so wise.

They don’t act like the children of stage parents just rarin’ to get their kids into any TV production, no matter what the risks. They seem to be the children of intelligent, sensible parents who are capable of reading a contract and thought “Kid Nation” could be a once-in-a-lifetime, rewarding experience.

As for the injuries—stuff happens. Being outdoors, being active, and doing work are inherently risky prospects. A million kids and parents undertake such risks every summer when they take part in the tradition that is summer camp. When I went to camp, I dug my own latrine and cooked over an open fire. I was 10. When my brothers went to camp, they hiked down and back up the Grand Canyon in one day—a hike that has been known to kill those ill-prepared for it. They were 13. Some kids fly fish. Some kids do hours of drills and soccer. Some kids canoe through Minnesota’s 1,000 lakes.

Some kids get poison ivy. Some kids break a leg. Some kids get dehydrated. Tragically, some kids even drown. It happens every summer.

The idea that the kids of “Kid Nation” were truly as unsupervised as the show’s advertising suggests—40 kids. 40 days. No adults.—is ludicrous, but there sure are a lot of people out there who are suddenly utterly credulous of the claims of reality TV producers.

In fact, according to producers and in true reality-show style, the show is not exactly what it purports to be. “Kid Nation” had pediatricians, paramedics, lawyers, child psychologists, and plenty of cameramen on set at all times, according to CBS. Children were evaluated and asked every day whether they wanted to continue on the show. They had the option to leave whenever they wanted.

In the end, the lawyers will work out the legalities. Should the kids have been paid as “actors” or “reality show participants?” Were they doing “work” or attending “camp?” If CBS broke the law, it will pay a price, as it should.

The show, debuting Sept. 19, will give us a better idea of what the kids went through, and America will decide whether it wants to watch.

In our risk-averse culture, some tend to think any kid not helmeted, medicated, and insulated within an inch of his life is risking his life. Most kids will tell you it’s when they’re cut loose and rough-and-tumble that they’re having the times of their lives.

To me, “Kid Nation” looks like it entailed the same risks and hard work of some serious summer camping. To call it “child abuse” is more than a bit…outrageous.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Mary Katharine Ham is a contributor to Townhall Magazine.

Be the first to read Mary Katharine Ham's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

KID NATION OR KID KOMMUNE?
I know nothing about this program other than the publicity that the show is going to happen.

My first impression was that the leftists running tv would see to it that it turned into Kid Kommune in order to prepare the kids for the promoters' vision of the future Amerika.

I really don't know that I want to watch to find out.

suggestion for LeishC:
LeishaC writes: I'm a teacher (and prom sponsor) now, and I have to tell kids everything. I'm trying to teach them to take ownership and do it for themselves, but it's a foreign concept.
\==============

The secret is letting them scrape a few ledges but not hard enough to sink the boat. I am not so sure that your cheerleader advisor wasn't quietly watching in the distance.

What I usually do is let the kids not handle things until they are just at the point when they realize that they are in over their heads and then give them a list of things to do. I may quietly make the "shadow arrangements" -- call a vendor and tell them that the kids will be calling sometime in the near future and this is what they want and this is what they have to spend.


There are advantages to learning stuff..
> eddred writes: Dig your own latrine.

This actually suprised me because the move since the 1970s increasingly has been "no dig" camping so as to prevent the problems of hundreds of people digging (and filling) hundreds of holes.

> Did you have to build the little house
> that goes over it to?

If there is no one else around, you don't need the little house...

> Ham and the gang were roasting squirrel
> they had bagged earlier during a varmit hunt.

I actually had road-kill woodchuck once, not something I would order in a resturant but not all that bad. This was, of course, in a wilderness survival course...

> she was so intrigued with the bathrooms in
> her dorms with their indoor plumbing

*I* was -- of course I was in the dorm for my father's graduation and was about 5 years old at the time -- and I had never seen a row of 20 sinks, all working, all of which could be turned on at the same time...

Reply to SizzleLean
Good Morning, SizzleLean. Oops, you're right I made a typo in "sociological." Sorry. Having been the sole ultra-conservative in my ultra-liberal social/ecological justice-promoting school's new media psych program, one benefit has been my skin has been thickened further.

I agree with you about the proliferation of lawsuits for any purpose that can be thought up. I agreed with MK that rough and tumble should be part of a child's life and the "hey, put a bandaid on it and get over it" attitude.

I just wanted to point out that these parents are sending their children into an environment where the parents - in exchange for a little money - have no input on what is occurring with their children's lives. This show is a little different from a camp that can be researched,etc. To send an 8 yr old child into an environment that could even possibly produce occasions to become infected with HIV, etc. just doesn't sound right to me. I don't think summer camps have this type of disclaimer (HIV, pregnancy, emotional distress, etc.) but perhaps I am wrong.

I am not a clinician so I don't usually use PhD after my name; I hestitantly did on my post because I was referencing something I had posted elsewhere that was related to my field of interest. I did not intend, nor do I believe I implied, that it somehow made me unique from the other posters. I apologize if that was the impression. I wish you the best.
Rachel Bishar


Okay, here I go
First, I can't imagine a parent who thinks putting their kids on TV in this manner is a good idea. Is it always harmful? Probably not. Does a real risk exist that the publicity effects will end up that way? Yep. Some risks, even in childhood, are necessary. Making your kid a TV personality isn't.

However, there is NOTHING about this situation which is different in kind or extent from Hollywood child actors. Yet no one considers that abusive. As long as it happens in glittering Hollywood among our human idols, it's apparently okay. Just not on TV.

This is a silly controversy. It demonstrates (and capitalizes upon) two unfortunate human characteristics -- the willingness to shut off our reason and jump on the 'offended' bandwagon, and the unwillingness to apply rational standards to the glittering human gods we make for ourselves in Hollywood.

10,000, not 1,000
Nice column, but it's 10,000 lakes in Minnesota, not 1,000. I canoed through a couple of them, but I don't know anyone who did much more than that.

Kids need self-sufficiency
Kids these days have no idea how to do anything for themselves. Parents, teachers, counselors have to tell them step-by-step how to do everything. (Here I go with a "when I was a kid..." story, but...) When I was in junior high, I was a cheerleader. We had a sponsor in name only. She never came to practices, and rarely had any contact with us about anything. We organized our practices, raised money to go to camp, got our parents to take us to camp, where we stayed without a chaperone (and behaved). We weren't allowed to ride the team bus to games, so we organized a parental transportation schedule ourselves. We made our rules and enforced them. When I was a junior, we were in charge of the prom, but had no parental or teacher support. We scheduled meetings, raised funds, negotiated contracts, handled all the financial dealings, and pulled off a beautiful prom. I'm a teacher (and prom sponsor) now, and I have to tell kids everything. I'm trying to teach them to take ownership and do it for themselves, but it's a foreign concept.

My thoughts
My family loved to camp, and both I and my brother went to boy scout or YMCA camps most summers. It was similar to what Mary Katharine describes, not like eddred doing paper machie' while the scoutmaster fired up the propane stove...

Stoic Patriot, "Seeing the toil and strife of children is not something that I consider worthy of having bread and circuses over." Well, I guess that depends on whether their toil and strife ended in miserable failure or proud accomplishment. I was a swimming instructor for the National Youth Sports Program while in collage, and I always taught beginners. My kids worked very hard and some had to overcome serious fears, but they passed: every last one of them. The course ended with Parent's Night so they could show off their new skills, and those kids were walking 10 feet tall they were so proud.

I was pretty darn proud of them myself, as you can probably tell.

Mary Katharine
You forget that you grew up in the South. Although Southern coulture is being slowly destroyed by television we still believe in letting kids go outside to play. In fact, some of us ran them outside to play to get them out from in front of the tube and MTV.

Ant to a lot of you other people. You missing the point of her article. It wasn't whether or not the kids should have been paid what ever actor's scale is now. It was whether or not they were endangered making the show.

Yeah, Utah,
'Bout as real as TV wrestling; choreographed to the hilt. lol Even the arguments and "dislike" were put-up jobs.

Any one of them drown or freeze on screen? Or was it always "a friend of a friend"? Did they pick any one of the actors out of his cab on the bottom? Or were the trucks always empty when they broke through? Did the trucks even get there under their own power or were they towed then sunk?

The only "reality" is their arrogance; that's too typical of the breed. Not always true across the board, mind you, just typical...

You want reality TV?
Ice Road Truckers

It's the only reality show on TV

Kid Nation
We are destroying our children by trying to protect them from everything in life that has a potential for failure. We don't want to destroy their self-esteem so we lie to them and tell them they are great at everything which takes away their drive to succeed. I don't know how I survived my childhood. We rode bikes without helmets! There were no seatbelts in cars. I fell down and got cuts and scrapes. We are protecting our children into being hopeless, helpless, dependent, functional idiots. Kids need challenges to grow. These kids on KidNation were lucky they had the opportunity to think and make decisions on their own. They saw the consequences of their actions. They saw the fruits of their labor and I'm sure they were so proud of themselves when they succeeded. I bet they grew tremendously from the experience.

First I heard of this one, Ms Ham.
And the feat was quite easy, actually. I seldom turn on The Box, other than to watch Bones, Eureka, or The History Channel. DishNetwork and DVRs are great.

As someone said early on, this featured show has already been done...as The Lord Of The Flies.

Undoubtedly much better the first time around, knowing TV as I do.

Without even seeing it, I'm guessing this is how it goes/went -- provided there is/was no "adult" giving direction behind the scenes so everything is/was played out as predetermined:

- Boys form "tribe", strongest leading through brute force, someone doing the shaman role. Pecking order established.

- If girls are allowed on board, one ends up the power behind...etc.; another plays her games, unconsciously perhaps, and stirs the male pot. Things get primitive.

I think we all know children can be the real monsters, left to their own devices. I mean, come on, look at our society.

Next post I'll tell you what I really think. lol

M-Kat you are right
I grew up as a Boy Scout in an active troup. I am proud of being an Eagle Scout. Heck I never considered camping as being work. Sure there was always work to do, but come on. Get paid for camping? Wake up and smell the coffee. That's part of the experinece. We did over nighters every month spent a week at summer camp, went hiking four or five times a year (we even formed an Explorer post, so mothers and sisters could join us on the hikes. And yeah we got hurt. Splatter with grease? Get real, that's nothing. I get that camping with the family (still do that, too.)

Eddred, ZB2 is right. Simply bad manners, uncalled for and rude.

To: eddred
Your whole post was simply bad manners and uncalled for.

The North Pole
A new reality show, where all of our Senators and Congressman and congresswoman are dropped off at the North Pole at an altitude of 45,000 feet. After landing they are to make there way back to D.C., if they can. they have to battle: Polar Bears, harsh weather conditions, unruly Inuits. when nearing the Arctic Circle they have to dress up as Harp Seal Babies (Ted Kennedy, Harp Seal Baby (Scary Image)) and make it by the Seal Hunters. Crossing back across the Border will be no problem, thanks to themselves. Upon completing this trek, they are treated to a BBQ with George W.

I will guarantee that there is
not one parent who isn't hoping for some kind of instant stardom to eminate from this Kid Nation opportunity. That's not necessarily bad, but may not be all that good either, depending on the parents' goals.

I'm actually looking forward to seeing this show, not that I expect to be a forever fan of it. But kids learning to take care of themselves,feed themselves, cook, solve problems -- those are all useful life skills, and somehow I don't think the experience is going to be a scarring or traumatic one for them.

What's needed to be said...
Has been said. The kids were out there voluntarily, and could leave whenever they wished. I don't think this can even be construed as exploitation because the kids retained a choice concerning whether or not they wished to be there throughout the show's filming.

The only thing which disturbs me about this is that such television can actually be viewed as "entertainment." Seeing the toil and strife of children is not something that I consider worthy of having bread and circuses over.

Rachel Bishar, PhD-you're an idiot(imo)
The contract wording is pretty standard. It is worded like it is because there are no absolute guarantees in life and people love to play the tort lottery if anything ever goes wrong in their life. Even with a signed contract, it can be nullified for a variety of reasons - ultimately because no one ever wants to be responsible for anything bad that ever happens to them and there are any number of judges and juries who are ready to sock it to people with deep pockets for anything. To constantly screech about every little thing that it appears you are wont to do merely reinforces the mindset of the attorneys to include everything under the sun in the contract exemptions. For a PhD you're pretty lacking in common sense (IMO). Now run along and find a "darker socialogical (sic) aspect" somewhere else to get your panties in a wad over. And be sure to include the PhD after your name in all of your communications for your self gratification (have you ever asked another psychologist about what makes you do this odd behavior).

Something to consider
Here's a little twist to the argument. MKH states in the article that the kids are Working together, and solving problems.

Libs in the media can't stand to see anyone, let alone Kids who are able to solve their own problems. If we were all self sufficient, why do we need liberal "protectors"?

While I'm no fan of "reality shows", this one actually has a slight potential of being worth watching. If nothing else I bet the kids came away with a new-found sense of self sufficiency,
and that is always a good thing.

But then I'm 47 :op

Safe??? Children must be Safe???
In truth the lawyers and the libs are doing their level best to make life as a child as BORING as they possibly can.

Swimming holes (the kind with a rope on the branch of a tree) are disappearing faster than joints at hempfest during a raid.

Horseback camps are harder to find than a clean shirt in a homeless tent city.

I'm just waiting for the liberals to come out and be honest they want to, stated in its simplest form, make having fun illegal.

jd


Right on, M-Kat!
I've seen child abuse - REAL child abuse... this does not EVEN come close to the real thing. Let's reserve our outrage for the sub-human vermin that do UNspeakable things to children... JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN!

Look beyond the surface - it is chilling
Mary Katharine, please at least consider my take on this travesty:

http://mediapsyched.com/2007/08/23/pimping-my-kid-part-2/

http://mediapsyched.com/2007/08/17/exploitive-class-distinction-in-kid-nation/

When you're in a financial deal, you need to run the numbers to get the truth. For business agreements, READ THE CONTRACT. These "parents" are basically offering up their children for the pursuit of secondary fame.I agree with your take on the rough and tumble normalcy of camp. But there is a darker socialogical aspect of this whole venture.
All the best,
Rachel Bishar, PhD
Media Psychologist

Neglect
Leaving Bleach in an unmarked bottle COULD BE considered neglectful. However, THIS IS CBS! I'm sure Bill Burkett has documents proving their innocence.

Neglect
Leaving Bleach in an unmarked bottle COULD BE considered neglectful. However, THIS IS CBS! I'm sure Bill Burkett has documents proving their innocence.

Info for Ed Morrissey
Child actors or performers on TV shows (as well as radio, theater, etc.) are exempt from the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. CBS was under no legal requirement to limit hours worked per day.

I wouldn't call it expolitation either. Assuming the hours and pay you listed are correct, that would come out to $8.33 per hour which is far above the federal minimum wage ($5.85 per hour) and higher than a lot of adults are making.

Loner
BTW: Thanks for the funniest post I've read in a long time! Great Humor! ...but what do I know? I'm 53!

Kids learn by doing
Wow. The kids learned a few things by doing? Maybe we should send Congress to a deserted town and let them figure things out.

Growing up would be a good thing.

I wonder how much the hands-off approach was implemented with all the producers, cameramen and psychologists around, but, hey, anybody that thinks the parents' signed agreement that exempted CBS from liability in the event of death has simply not been paying attention in our litigious society.

I don't for one second believe that they were being cavalier with the kids' health. They wouldn't dare have been that stupid.

I will say, though, that they must have had a stupid lawyer not to find the "summer camp" loophole. OOPS.

my 2 cents
Who did the camerawork? Kids? The whole thing sounds like the next chapter of pathetic

If you don't like the idea then DON'T WATCH THE SHOW.


iow - FOLLOW THE MONEY

If the show's rating's tank c BS will tank the show just like that.

FOLLOW THE MONEY

Next question

FYI - I have thought since they first started that reality shows are pathetic and nothing has happened to make me change my mind. I have NEVER watched one for more than five minutes and never will. To me they are simply based on the fact that there is a virtually inexhaustible supply of people out there who are willing to endure humiliation in order to get their 15 minutes, and for every one of them willing to risk humiliation there are probably a few mill of folks just drooling at the mouth to watch it.

In other words - pathetic.

Kid Nation … Why Growing Up Is Hard
In the early 1990’s, before Rudy Giuliani became the Mayor, radio talk show host, Rush Limbaugh would always describe New York City as the place where every liberal dream was tried and had come true. Liberal thinking and governance had failed in allowing the city to be a nice place to live.

When people are asked … how did they arrive at looking at politics from a conservative viewpoint - they generally state … well, I grew up and I have responsibilities.

To read some of the quotes attributed to the "Kid" cast members of a new reality television show to be aired on CBS one begins to gain insight to why growing up and taking on responsibility might be a good thing.

Take the following example of an eleven year old kid from Upton, Massachusetts named Guylan. He is quoted as thinking that Fidel Castro is a world leader that should be admired. The specific reasons he sites are Fidel's accomplishments that include the overthrow of a government, the instillation of a socialist system, and his ability to remain in control against every effort put forward by the United States to remove him.

Remember, Guylan is only eleven years old ... in his bio, he wonders why we are in Iraq ... considering that he was only about five years old when the World Trade Towers were taken down with hijacked passenger jet airplanes on September 11, 2001, how could he ever be expected to connect the dots.

“Kid Nation” should be renamed “Lib Village”!

Kid Nation is being played out everyday in our urban public schools. The challenges there, however, are how to make the adults agree with their point of view and thinking.

After reading most of the "bio" information at Kid Nation, I believe the kids are winning … which isn’t all that good … who is there to challenge them, you know, give them a different point of view?

From Original Posting:
maxine-log.blogspot.com/2007/08/kid-nation-why-growing-up-is-hard.html

Where is the real in "Reality Shows"?
1) Reality Shows? I'm 52 years old and any "reality" show I have ever seen...must be somebody elsees reality. What is real about walking around all day with a camera in your face? But then I am 52. I grew up with Lucy.

2) Letting kids learn to work, deal with other
people, and learn the basics of getting along in
the world...is a bad thing? I had paper routes,
helped around the house, worked summers...but then again I'm 52

3) Mary Katherine, you are the best. Lordly, I
wish I was 32 again...but then I'm 52.

4) Number 3 should have been number 1...but then
again....I'm 52.

Oh It's Abuse Alright
Mary Katherine, How could you have missed the boat by so far.

This latest rendition of "Reality TV" is abuse alright, simply by being the latest rendition of "Reality TV. Watching clips of the earliest editions of this kind of show caused me to take a solemn vow to never watch one of these garbage shows. So far I'm managing to hold out...it's real easy.

The abused are not the kids or other participants in these fiascos but the TV viewers. The cost of talent is a major cost of producing a TV program. Totally eliminate all on screen talent and you eliminate a major cost. The people who make fortunes producing TV shows have no trouble at all finding an audience for their garbage. Viewers give a free pass to the purveyors of any and all varieties of this crapola.

Anyone who spends more than 30 seconds looking at this stuff is being abused. The scary part is they don't get it.

Those who produce these shows are almost like a bunch of kids themselves, playing adults. "Hey guys, lets make a TV show, we won't need any talent and the rest will be easy".

Disaster for reality genre?
M. Sederoff said it twice, but it's worth saying again:

"We couldn't be that lucky."

Good riddance
" “Kid Nation could spell disaster for reality genre.” "

We couldn't be that lucky.

Good riddance
" “Kid Nation could spell disaster for reality genre.” "

We couldn't be that lucky.

Real Child Abuse
This is not child abuse. Mary Katherine hit the nail on the head. This has turned out to be the all to common way to file lawsuites.

The real child abuse, which seems to be reported by few media outlets is the more than numerous times that children are sexually abused, some by the same person over long periods of time, only to have activist judges give them absurd prison time or probation because they feel these scum can change their ways.

This is the real child abuse!

Whatcha gonna do?
Hey, it's August, a slow news month. The newsies have to fill up all that dead airtime and all those empty papers with SOMETHING.

The parents involved knew exactly what their children were going to be doing, and gave their permission. It's not as though the participants were kidnapped off the streets, or left to unsupervised mayhem.

Now, we're going to be treated to the spectacle of legal gamesmanship, complete with the usual exaggerations, which is what this is really all about.

Yawn.

Why not use your kids for 15 min fame?
Is it not the only feverish dream of every child and adult in the US of A to get on teevee for even 1 minute during its lifetime? Do we not see even the most serious and life threatening situations being reported on with hordes of jumping, grinning monkeys behind the broadcaster who cannot wait to call home on the cell phone and squawk “DIDJASEEMEONTEEVEE?”

Whyever not start pimping your kiddies at the age of 8 to feed their fever dream of stardoom by getting their faces on the Screen for that 15 minutes of fame?

I look forward to next seasons production “Toddler Nation” with its added titillation factor that toddlers are very fond of appearing stark nekkid without warning!

Would I let my kids take part in something like this? Not on your life.

Lord of the Flies
I'm just grateful that a _Lord of the Flies_ scenario didn't ensue.

Where do you draw the line?
Summer camp primarily serves the needs of kids. Television productions primarily serve the needs of advertisers and broadcasters. Merely calling something educational does not exempt it from following the law. Using this logic, any television show could be called "educational" to kids and therefore the labor laws bypassed. I'm sure the stars of "Full House" found their experience educational -- but that shouldn't have let the producers off the hook for limited work hours, etc.

Had CBS decided to go to Camp Ahwahnee to film a documentary, it would have been no problem. That's not what was done here. They created the camp for the purpose of putting on a television show, which means that the kids were working for CBS -- and the network paid them $5,000 for 40 15-hour days in a row.

Is it abuse? No. Is it exploitation? Of course it is.

Hysteria
Although I loathe reality TV (too contrived), I have to agree that the brouhaha about Kid Nation is way over the top.

We have come to a point in our litigious society where we are afreid to risk anything going wrong, no matter how small. Kids can hardly even play at school recess anymore for fear one of them might get hurt.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.