Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 27, 2006
Mary Katharine Ham :: Townhall.com Columnist
Hey, Liberals! Lecture me about racism when you've stopped creating more of it
by Mary Katharine Ham
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you feel the leaked information from a global warming alarmist organization is meaningful?



I’m a racist. You’re a racist. He’s a racist. She’s a racist. Wouldn’t you like to be a racist, too?

This election cycle has sounded like a sicko version of that old Dr. Pepper ad. So many people are racists, it’s hard to keep up!

Let’s take a look at this week’s charges of racism, which come from the Left. They focus on two ads in the Tennessee Senate race. This race features Republican Bob Corker and Democrat Harold Ford, Jr. Corker is a white, former mayor of Chattanooga, and owner of a successful construction business. Ford is a black Congressman from a prominent political family in the state.

Here’s the TV ad in question. Go ahead and watch it. I’ll be here when you get back. The alleged racism lies in the fact that a white, blonde woman says, “I met Harold at the Playboy party,” and entreats him to call her at the end of the ad. The theory of those crying racism is that the idea of a white woman fraternizing with a black man was meant to conjure up some good Old South feelings about interracial dating.

It’s a serious reach to assume that was the intent of the Republican National Committee. Had they featured a black woman asking him to call her, I’m sure there would have been some coded message there as well, like, “Harold Ford should stick to his kind.” I don’t know how the liberal mind works, but I’ve gotta believe if it weren’t this racial overreach, it would have been another one.

People disagree with me on this. Republicans disagree with me on it. Ken Mehlman said he understands the other side’s point of view and Corker disavowed the ad on the grounds that it was “tacky.” Others have told me it was a Republican gaffe, racist or not, because it could be read as racist. Well, frankly, if we limit our political advertising things that won’t offend liberals, we will have no political advertising.

Try the other one on for size. It’s a radio ad, once again anti-Ford. Listen to it, here.

Now, the “racist” story behind this one is that there are drums as soundtrack to the parts of the ad that talk about Harold Ford. Liberal blogs have referred to them as “tom-toms” and “jungle drums,” and suggested that they’re meant to evoke images of Africa, the Dark Continent, thus turning off lily white Southern voters. Of course, it’s hard to make the argument that the anti-Ford ad is accentuating Ford’s ethnic “savagery” when the ad copy refers to his prep-school education and Northeastern roots.

Is it just me or does it feel more likely that the people who see and hear these innocuous ads and immediately jump to accusations of racism are the ones with the racial hang-ups, not Republican Southerners?

All of their theories, of course, are predicated on the idea that Tennesseans, and all Southern conservatives, are troglodytic racists who are boorish enough to vote against a man because he’s black and simultaneously sophisticated enough to pick up on very subtle coded political messages about his race.

I just don’t buy it. Listen, I understand that white Southerners are not wholly undeserving of such suspicions. Neither, certainly, are Republican operatives. I’ve lived in the South my whole life. I have seen much racial strife. But I’ve also seen much racial strife overcome.

The South is a resilient place full of warm people who don’t spend all their time thinking about race. It’s a place where black and white people live side by side, in greater percentages than any other region in the country, and where peace between them is the rule, not the exception.

Tennessee, in particular, was the first former Confederate state to ratify the 14th amendment and it had an anti-Klan law as early as 1868. It elected its first black member of the state General Assembly in 1873—Sampson W. Keeble.

More recently, the state has also elected Harold Ford, Jr. and his father before him to represent the 9th Congressional District from 1975 until now. Those are just a few things you can learn about Tennessee from a quick Google search. The same can be done for any Southern state. The South and its people are not the caricatures the Left makes them out to be. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Mary Katharine Ham is a contributor to Townhall Magazine.

Be the first to read Mary Katharine Ham's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Politically correct
You decry a double standard on perceived racism, pointing out liberals make racist commentary and don't get called on it like conservatives do. I agree even though I am a liberal.

I wholeheartedly agree that racism abounds without distinction between political persuasions.

You castigate Steny Hoyer for using "slavishly" to describe Lt. Gov. Steele's support of the Republican agenda. It was politically incorrect because of the root of the word. It would be political suicide in Maryland to have publicly uttered a racial slur with obvious intent and I think Mr. Hoyer is too smart to have meant it in a racial, pejoritave manner.

Not every utterance that is politically racially incorrect is intended as a slur. You used the expression Steele outshined Cardin. That's about as racist as one can get if the reader would take out of context or wanted to manipulate the words against you. Of course that would be outrageous, but all is far in love, war and politics.

If a Liberal blogger conceding that Steele badly beat Cardin and used those words Steele outshined Cardin, would that revoke an outrage in the Steele camp?

It's OK to be passionate in your politics, but let's not construe everything as an intentional slur by one side and not by the other. I guess that is your very point. Just follow it.

BTW, qualifying Allen's use of "macaca" as questionably racist is insulting to any open minded reader. He used the word twice. he denied knowing the meaning, suggesting that it was a spontaneous utterance, never having heard the word before. If he didn't mean to be racist in uttering the term twice, why try to make such obviously lame excuses?

BTW, Steele is a very magnetic personality whereas Cardin has an extremely blah personality; that will stand well for Steele. I support Cardin because he represents my values and political beliefs and he took a courageous stand in voting against the war in Iraq. He was proven correct on every score. Much to Cardin's credit, he researched the reported intelligence, pouring over classified documents open to congressmen. Virtually all other members ignored independent sources for whatever reason. I will take a cold fish who does his own critical thinking on my behalf anytime.

Good luck for your candidates next Tuesday; it should prove to be interesting.


It's A Goldmine!
If you are offered huge sums of money to solve a problem, are you actually going to solve it? Put yourself out of a job? Silly goose...of course not! It's like the Welfare Sysem. If 3 Case workers each handle 30 cases and they eliminate 10 each, who are not qualified for benefits, one of them is out of a job. It's not rocket science.
Racism is job security for way too many people. Just think of the unemployment lines! First, you start with legitimate complaints - voting, education, jobs. Of course!! Then, there are problems with voting (one must read or show ID, Racism), the education system (standards are way too high, Racism) and obtaining jobs (Affirmative Action, Reverse Descrimination). Now, of course, more money to solve these.
Every Citizen should be entitled to the same Constitutional rights. Now comes "Civil Rights". Just exactly what are these? The right not to be offended? The right to have every stranger you see smile at you? Hmmm...only my friends can offend me since they are the only ones who actually know WHAT will offend me. Get it? Then comes "collectively offensive"...what??? If the shoe fits wear it, if not...big deal.
If anyone is offended by my comments, it's due to their opinion of themselves, not mine!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.