Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 18, 2007
Mary Grabar :: Townhall.com Columnist
Another Famous Literary Atheist
by Mary Grabar
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
With unemployment at 10.2%, what will happen by the end of Obama's first term?



He is a man convinced that he is right and he is very angry that most of the world refuses to recognize it.

One person he hates in particular is Jerry Falwell whom he called an “ugly little charlatan” and “bully and fraud” on the day of his death. He began his interview on CNN with Anderson Cooper by proclaiming, “I think it’s a pity there isn’t a hell for him to go to.” Christopher Hitchens, sophisticate and contributing editor to Vanity Fair, joins Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins and others who have written bestsellers claiming that religion causes hatred. His is called God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.

That’s the thing about atheists: They greet death with great relish and glee. Along with their loss of an overall sense of sanctity goes their respect for the sanctity of the occasion. I imagine they have the neighborhood gossips giving the dirt over their own mothers’ ashes. Or upon the death of a spouse, perhaps they quickly dispense of the body and resume the pursuit of their next pleasure, which is the only solace they have in their little kingdoms of one.

The twentieth-century was one of the reign of terror by atheists. On a global scale we have seen this in the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, China, and numerous principalities around the globe.

But before such egomaniacs come into power the groundwork has to be laid by such “progressives.” We begin with Marx and then proceed to the early twentieth-century apologists for atheism. Such men capitalize on world crises. The present company of atheists is capitalizing on Islamic terrorism.

They enjoy their own moments in the spotlight as they boldly declare their contempt for God and freedom from the fear of death.

But their personal lives reveal something far different.

Mark Twain, funny and talented fellow that he was, spent his last days penning bitter tracts. Sinclair Lewis, for all his glib satirizing of bourgeois small-town life and gullibility of those who follow preachers, ended his life in lonely dissipation and drink. He, like today’s atheists, demanded God prove his existence. Lewis stood at a church pulpit and gave God ten minutes to strike him dead. Needless to say, God did not follow Lewis’s orders.

Today’s atheists repeat these same tired tactics and arguments that Lewis and others used in the 1930s and before. The difference is that they do it on television and in “debates” on college campuses. The difference is that people are even more gullible today than they were back then because they are more ignorant of the Bible.

And they are ignorant of the misery that atheism causes in this life.

I could get through only half of Theodore Dreiser’s diaries of a life of “free love” in Greenwich Village back in the 1910s for fear of lapsing into my own depression. His days seemed to be filled with meaningless sexual encounters, hostility from girlfriends, and frequent visits to a clinic for therapy and medication.

Women fare worse, for sometimes pregnancies result from affairs, and then abortions. Edna Saint Vincent Millay may have been a brilliant poet and a role model of an early liberated woman for feminists, but I would not want the emotional turmoil of her open marriage and numerous abortions.

Ernest Hemingway, after his fourth marriage, and facing his sixties, put a gun to his head. Most recently, in 2005, a protégé, Hunter S. Thompson, did the same and gave instructions to his widow and friends to have his ashes blasted from a cannon.

The symbolism of the ashes heading up into the sky is obvious, but the physical laws of gravity (the only laws atheists ultimately obey) require that what goes up come back down.

I will not presume to know where Hunter S. Thompson is now, just as I do not presume to know God’s reasons for allowing 9/11. I do recall, though, the wonderful description of Satan being hurled from heaven in Paradise Lost: Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mary Grabar earned her Ph.D. in English from the University of Georgia and teaches in the Atlanta area. She is a Pushcart Prize-nominated poet and published fiction writer. Visit her website and get on her mailing list at marygrabar.com
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Atheists consider themselves all knowing
The columnist is wrong, atheists don't consider themselves all knowing anymore then christians who don't believe in a purple tiger circling a planet 40 light years away don't consider themselves all knowing. Atheism-non belief in God, agnosticsm, non-knowledge of a God. Neither contradicts the other. One can be both and virtually everyone doesn't believe in purple tigers circling far away planets, but one doesn't have to be all knowing to have that logical opinion

religion is the parallel postulate ...
Personally I prefer the more complex and nuanced non-Euclidean Conservativism of Hitchens, Dawkins, et. al. They've arrived at it through rational thought, hard work teased out from a few sensible premises while the nabobs of religion seem to be up to something else entirely. While a dime store psychologist might say they're all up to "will to power" ... these limousine televangelists are really off-putting, exploiting their gullible flock who apparently can't spell, with no qualms.

This observation in no different than Grabar's observation that literary talent and intelligence may in fact be genetically related to being prone to depression (undoubtedly when the real world doesn't behave and succumb to one's reason, intellect, and rational thought: idiotic northeastern liberal elites like Bush; coopting a Southern accent, cowboy boots, and "god bless America" while espousing open borders, spending our hard-earned dollars like a drunken sailor, and selling our country down the toilet for instance, while nominating his cronies like Alberto and Harriet and entrusting our ports to gulf emirates ... excuse me but how was any of that different than Hillary(care) and her travel office coup?). Heck even Clinton was more aggressive in Kosovo than Bush has been so far in Iraq.

Anecdotally speaking, the greats of literature seem to be disproportionately represented in the ranks of the clinically depressed and emotionally unstable: Plath, Genet, Hemingway, et. al.

In general I read Buchanan and Coulter "religiously;" I truly love their patriotism and faith in America in spite of some of the above but personally I cringe every time they mention religion with no sense of irony. They fail to consider that many who agree with their demonization of the Democrat (sic) religion can't abide their own wholesale adoption of this same sort of "faith"-based knowledge system which is clearly a retrograde alternative to the proven set of unknowability principles as embodied in the science of Godel, evolution, and quantum mechanics.

I've found that almost everyone who truly understands Godel, evolution, and the hard sciences is at least familiar with religious thought; including those who may have rejected it down the road for other strains of thought including atheism, OTOH there are legions of religionists who just have no conception of rational thought and the hard sciences beyond "that's what the bible says."

Regardless of whether you believe in the deconstructionists or not, the bible reads no differently than any set of man-made allegorical writings and in this regard; the quality of these writings whether you believe them to be fiction or non-fiction (ontologically speaking would they be even better as literature were they actually true?) is often inferior in quality to the writings that were implicitly about "the bible" and religion as embodied in the greats of literature and philosophy: Dostoyevsky and the great philosophers who've tackled religion and religious issues: Descartes, Spinoza, Nietzsche, et. al. all seem to have more interesting things to say about religion than the de facto religious texts themselves: the Bible, the Koran, Confucius, etc. I'll take my religion through my own exegesis and hermeneutics thank you; I don't need one of these polyester preachers as my interlocutor ... and if that's an insult to Jerry , Jim, Tammy Faye, Orel, Pat, et. al. then so be it. The difference between them and Hitchens and Dawkins is that you might actually learn something if you understand the thought processes of the latter two, while the rest seem to be about empire building for the sake of themselves and their own empire.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.