Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, November 09, 2006
Marvin Olasky :: Townhall.com Columnist
Voting out the mean-spirited party
by Marvin Olasky
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


"You saw the idealism, and then you saw people lose a little focus, and you saw the corrupt influences of power affect Republicans." That's how Rep. John Shadegg of Arizona put it, and he's right.

"I'm a lifelong Baptist and vote for Democrats. One reason? Democrats are serious about alleviating poverty." That's what North Carolina basketball coaching legend Dean Smith said in newspaper ads, and he's partly right.

He's only partly right because Democrats, although often serious, have been ineffective -- and how serious are those who repeatedly choose what sounds good over what is good?

But Republican failures made Coach Smith's statement look right to many voters. Republicans paid for their inability, despite Congressional majorities, to move ahead a compassionate conservative agenda. They did not advance alternatives to the failed faith that we measure our concern for the poor by the size of our governmental appropriations.

Not to say that poverty fighting was a major issue in the campaign. Certainly Iraq was No. 1, although the election was by no means a mandate to give up. (A New York Times/CBS News Poll just before the election showed 55 percent of Americans wanting to send more troops to Iraq, and 62 percent thinking the United States will have to stay in Iraq beyond two years.)

But we tend to vote for those with whom we feel comfortable -- and for many Americans, Republicans over the past five years have once again become the party of corporate suits. That didn't matter politically as long as folks thought the GOP was leading well concerning national security. Once that bulwark was gone, though, many voters looked to see if there was any other reason to choose Republicans -- and concluded that there was not.

Reality eventually trumps image. Karl Rove in the 1990s saw the political potential of compassionate conservatism: It blasted away at stereotypes about mean-spirited Republicans and left many among the warm-hearted feeling that they were not selling out by voting for those their parents had scorned. But the GOP showed it was not serious about alleviating poverty when it did not push through a decentralizing mix of anti-poverty tax credits and vouchers.

By just playing politics it opened the door to campaigns such as that of ordained minister Ted Strickland, who became Ohio's first Democratic governor in 16 years as he went around quoting Micah's injunction to do justice and love mercy. Just playing politics made some voters hope they could trust House Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi, who bragged that her party had a 42-member Democratic Faith Working Group.

It's right that some Republicans lost after they betrayed the principles that brought the GOP to congressional power in 1994 and elected George W. Bush as a compassionate conservative. It's good that some moderate Democrats won. It's sad that some good Republicans became collateral damage.

Now congressional Democrats have to govern. Democrats for Life wants the party to change its abortion position and hopes that Bob Casey, Jr., will lead the way -- but how will Democrats for Death respond? Will Democratic leaders take seriously evangelical concerns, or will they be like those who last year held a seminar at the University of California, Berkeley entitled, "I Don't Believe in God, But I Know America Needs a Spiritual Left"?

It will be fascinating to watch Democrats trying to make their tent bigger without alienating their Christophobic base. I hope they succeed, because America could use two parties that respect Biblical belief, so that evangelicals aren't captive to one. It will be fascinating to see if President Bush will start vetoing spending bills filled with pork and earmarks. I hope he becomes the fighter on domestic policy that he was supposed to be.

I also hope that the new Congress will take to heart the speech departing Sen. Rick Santorum gave late last month. He spoke about America's need to "come to grips with the terrible fact that we are at war. There is no escape because our enemies are fully committed to our destruction." That reality transcends this election.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Marvin Olasky is editor-in-chief of the national news magazine World, provost of The King's College, and a professor of journalism at The University of Texas at Austin. For additional commentary by Marvin Olasky, visit www.worldmag.com.
 
Be the first to read Marvin Olasky's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Compassionate Conservative
Jack Kemp defined compassionate conservative as not those who measure compassion bt how many are on the government dole but by how many aren't. Conservatives are interested in getting government out of the way so that people can succeed and enjoy their success.

Bush's terminology was to reconize that conservative have long reached out to others not through government programs but by individuals efforts and giving outside of government.

Remember Kerry and Hillieary talking about how moral they were for wanting to increase government programs for the poor? They just don't get it that people are much better at being compassionate than government.

When the Eurocrats complain about other countries giving more per captia that the US, they were only counting government relief efforts, not private donations.


Dean Smith may know basketball but he doesn't know compassion. When was the last time you saw compassionate basketball?

Compassion
Why are there so many people who need the government to support them? Why do they not work like the rest of us? How much do we owe them, and for generations? Should that be a political agenda for either party? You think slavery is over? No, I think there are still slaves down on the plantation sitting and waiting for the next handout...and the party who gives them the most is the most compassionate and deserves to be elected? Somehow none of this computes.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.