Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
Mike Gallagher
|
Mary Katharine Ham
|
Hugh Hewitt
|
Michael Medved
|
Michael Barone
|
Thomas Sowell
|
Tony Blankley
|
Ann Coulter
|
Dennis Prager
|
More
Wednesday, August 28, 2002
Exquisitly sensitive journalists
by
Marvin Olasky
0
Marvin Olasky's Email
|
Marvin Olasky
|
Author Biography
Read Comments
|
Post Comments
Forward
Print
Share
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+]
Text
[-]
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?
Yes
No
Maybe/ Don't Know
Yes (58 %)
No (21 %)
Maybe/ Don't Know (21 %)
Whole lot of hate speech goin' on this summer, our press tutors say. The New York Times reported that former Southern Baptist Convention president Jerry Vines' critique of Islam is "hate speech against Muslims." The Times complained that pointing out the Koran's militaristic emphasis and questioning the holiness of Mohammed's life has "become a staple of conservative Christian political discourse." The Washington Post emphasized its "disgust" with "anti-Muslim bigotry." Other publications have chimed in. My, my. If the Times and its brethren insist that Christians should demur to Muslim sensitivities, are they consistent in protecting religion? Let's just pretend that an artist were insensitive enough to paint a portrait of Jesus' mother Mary using clumps of elephant dung and cutouts from pornographic magazines. If such a vile thing were to happen, wouldn't the ever-so-sensitive Times decry the perpetrator for not respecting Christian sensitivities? Not exactly. Here's how the Times described on Oct. 5, 1999, Chris Ofili's "The Holy Virgin Mary," exhibited at the Brooklyn Museum of Art: "witty ... attractive ... colorful and glowing. The first impression it makes, before you decipher the little (porn) cutouts, is that it's cheerful, even sweet." Another Times reporter pointed out that "While news reports have described his paintings as being splattered with dung, the clumps are actually carefully placed." Whew, that's a relief. Or say -- again, just as a theoretical possibility -- someone were to put on a play portraying Jesus as a homosexual. Major newspapers certainly would criticize someone who mocked Christian sensitivities in that manner, wouldn't they? Nope. The Washington Post in 1998 asked about the play, Terrance McNally's "Corpus Christi," "What's wrong with letting individuals decide what they want to see?" The Chicago Tribune praised an "earnest and heartfelt play that pleads for the acceptance of gay sexuality within the Christian mainstream" and stated that "those who are uncomfortable with -- or opposed to -- the linking of gay themes with the narrative of the synoptic Gospels would not want to attend this particular show." Contradiction watch, anyone? Why hasn't The New York Times noted that hatred of Christ and Christians is a staple of culturally liberal artists? Why didn't the Chicago Tribune point out that Jerry Vines' comments were no big deal because those uncomfortable with criticism of Islam would not want to attend a Southern Baptist conference? Why didn't The Washington Post indicate disgust with the "artistic" immersion of a cross in urine? I'm not pushing for such comments because I think we've had too much talk about "hate speech" generally. In this free country, all of us should be free to criticize political and religious views. Ministers should be free to criticize other religions, and artists and playwrights should be free as well. A free press supplies vinegar, not syrup. Christians should be salt, not sugar. I do point out inconsistencies. Newspapers that claim to be "objective" shouldn't be protective of one religion while declaring open season on another. Many secular liberal reporters are clearly hostile to Christianity; nothing new there, but I wish they would admit it, instead of pretending to be neutral. I also wish that journalists would study Christianity enough at least to know how Christians think. The Austin American-Statesman recently profiled Dayna Curry and Heather Mercer, the two young missionaries freed late in 2001 from Taliban captivity. The newspaper was indignant about their desire to return to Afghanistan: "How dare these Americans endanger their own lives -- and those of innocents -- by tempting fate yet again, carrying Christianity to cultures that forbid it?" The two young women are daring because they do not believe in "fate." Instead, they trust a God who does what is best for all who believe in him. In this summer of exquisitely sensitive journalism, can we find a major newspaper that is sensitive to Christian understandings?
Share:
Digg
Del.icio.us
Facebook
Newsvine
My Web
MySpace
Forward
Print
Single Page
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
About The Author
Marvin Olasky is editor-in-chief of the national news magazine World, provost of The King's College, and a professor of journalism at The University of Texas at Austin. For additional commentary by Marvin Olasky, visit www.worldmag.com.
Be the first to read Marvin Olasky's column.
Sign up today
and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
News Articles On This Topic
AP Interview: SC senator stumps for climate change
Senator places hold on bill over custody battle
It's now Democrat vs. Democrat on health care
Mullen arrives in Iraq
Adm. Mullen says hacked drones caused no damage
Wrap-up bill clears Senate hurdle
Pentagon: Insurgents intercepted drone spy videos
11 baby deaths now linked to Simplicity cribs
Highlights of Senate wrap-up legislation
Obama, Medvedev to meet on nuclear weapons talks
Popular Articles By
Olasky
Morality Without God?
Candidate of the Future
Academic Perestroika
Join The Debate!
Post Your Comment
(
0
comments so Far)
View in ascending order
View in descending order
(
Read all 0 comments
)
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click
here
to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note:
Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.
New Blog Posts
Video
Audio
Obama's soundbyte heard 'round the world... (of talk radio...)
posted at 05:49 PM
Al Franken Denies Lieberman Extra Minute To Speak -- McCain Fires Back
posted at 05:04 PM
"Be careful what you ask for, because you just might get it."
posted at 05:00 PM
Morning Market Update
posted on:06/05/2009
Keepin' Away the Skeeters
posted on:06/05/2009
Man vs. Animal
posted on:06/05/2009
Panel Discussion: Remembering Reagan
posted on:06/23/2009
Chris Daggett
posted on:10/07/2009
The Headliners Hour 2
posted on:12/12/2009
Today's Columns
Fields :
When 'Spiritual Elevation' ...
Chavez :
Climate Hubris
North :
Be Afraid, Very Afraid
Tucker :
The Rising Tide of Red Ink
Buchanan :
Shakedown in Copenhagen
Goldberg :
Global Wealth Can Heal th...
Malkin :
Welcome to the Democratic P...
Krauthammer :
An Anniversary of Sort...
Limbaugh :
Radical Is as Radical App...
Charen :
Giving Thanks for Life
Bandes :
"Prediction: Pain" for Demo...
Gerson :
A Draconian Step in Uganda
Bozell :
TV and the Soft Eshoo Bill
West :
How a 'Surge' Fails Us, Part ...
Reagan :
The Haze of Copenhagen
May :
Save the SEALs
Harsanyi :
Hide the Decline ... and ...
Will :
When the Charm Rubs Off
Elder :
ObamaCare: Does It Cover 'St...
Gingrich Cushman :
A Woman's World
All Columns
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Save my list
THANK YOU
Your email has been sent.
News
Video
Audio
DINA CAPPIELLO : GOP: Obama can't act on climate without Congress
SAM HANANEL : Unions frustrated with Senate health care bill
Today's Cartoons
Friday, Dec. 18
Michael Ramirez
Eric Allie
Lisa Benson
Gary Varvel
More