Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Maggie Gallagher :: Townhall.com Columnist
Rights Activists Ignore China's One-Birth Policy
by Maggie Gallagher
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Death tolls from the Chinese quake now top 65,000. Hollywood's Sharon Stone wonders aloud whether "karma" explains the tragedy because (she said) the Chinese are "not nice to the Dalai Lama, who is a good friend of mine."

Amnesty International reports hopes are fading that the Beijing Olympics may lead China to reform, warning in an April report: "It is increasingly clear that much of the current wave of repression is occurring not IN SPITE OF the Olympics, but actually BECAUSE OF the Olympics."

But to me the most shocking reminder of how horrifying the Chinese government remains lies latent in this week's headlines: "One-Child Policy Has Exceptions After China Quake," as the Associated Press wrote.

Families with only one child killed in the earthquake "can obtain a certificate to have another child, the Chengdu Population and Family Planning Committee in the capital of hard-hit Sichuan province said."

The government will give you a certificate so you can have another child? How big of them.

Tibetan Buddhists have their friends in Hollywood, and the international human rights community still frowns on torturing political activists. But China's brutal oppression of women's bodies and basic disrespect for human life generates a collective yawn in the Western human rights community.

Throw an AIDS/HIV activist in jail? International outrage, naturally. But who really cares about the right of an ordinary Chinese woman to have her baby?

Chinese population policies spawn an ambivalent (at best) reaction in the West because so many agree with the goal, they tend to downplay or ignore the means.

In China the government owns everything, including women's bodies. Women must apply to their work unit for permission to get pregnant, and whole groups can be punished if one woman gets "illegally" pregnant. The "illegally born" are a serflike caste who can be denied equal access to a whole host of government services necessary for life under communism. "One Extra Birth, Whole Family Sterilized," warns a government propaganda poster (examples of which are collected and translated by the Laogai Research Foundation).

How does this "policy" work? One woman, a Muslim ethnic Uzbek in China named Mahire Omerjan, testified to the Laogai Research Foundation what it was like to "illegally" conceive her second child in the 1990s.

"Those at our company who were in charge of our planned birth knew I was pregnant. ... A few months later, they said, 'You can't have this child. It's not in keeping with the spirit of related documents.' ... 'I'm five months pregnant. We have our religious faith. By our religion, abortion is not permitted. It's a crime," Mahire replied.

The company bureaucrats didn't care.

Mahire pointed to laws permitting ethnic minorities to have more than one birth, pleading for her baby's life: "Many times I spoke with my bosses, requesting permission to have the child."

Alas, policies were violated; action must be taken.

"Finally, my unit decided to take me by force to the hospital for an abortion. I was then six and a half months pregnant."

Company officials tried to get Mahire to see reason: "'If you don't do what we want, we'll suspend your wages, cancel your bonuses, levy a 2,500 RMB penalty on you, suspend all benefits you are enjoying now. And your child will never have a residence permit. He'll be a nobody.'"

This is what a "non-forced abortion" in China looks like.

In the end, three company officials showed up at Mahire's house with a Nissan van and drove her to the hospital. When she saw the needle they were about to insert into her belly, "I told the obstetrician, 'Doctor, don't give me the shot. I want to go home. I want my child!' ... But the two nurses started pressing my arms with all their might. One of the nurses said ferociously, 'Who told you to get pregnant! Who told you not to act according to the planned birth policy!'"

Remember Mahire when you read about other human rights violations in China and when you watch the world's athletes come together in Beijing this spring.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Maggie Gallagher is a nationally syndicated columnist, a leading voice in the new marriage movement and co-author of The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially.

Be the first to read Maggie Gallagher's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

chinas policy on one birth
hey. its their football. they get to make the rules.. you dont wnt to play by them, thats your business go home. we have no right to criticize what they believe if s correct then they would have to stick their nose into our private affairs. they could, for example. ask why our goveernment is not organized in such a way so as o insure that presidents who ahve run out of and kind of dnocratic approval are allowed to ramain in office.

Boycott The Olympics
There is little any ordinary citizen can do about the barbarity of the Chinese leadership toward their own people. However, since China sees the Olympics as a means of "proving" that they are a major world player and a country worth respect I believe that those people who see through the lies to the barbarity beneath should refuse to play along.

Please join me and my household in a complete boycott of all things Olympic this year. We will not watch one moment of coverage, not even of our favorite events. We will not read news reports about the Olympics. We will not buy any Olympic-related merchandise.

Let us show China what civilized people think of their attempts to whitewash the brutal inhumanity of their policies by turning our backs upon the false front they're erecting to hide the stinking cesspool of their human rights violations.

Maggie
Why don't "US", start sending some of the "UNWANTED" children we have in America, to China?We could start with those in our Detention centers.I guaranteed they won't break any laws in China!"US" have our own problems,isn't borrowing their money enough,now we want their problems too.Where will it end MAGGIE???

To all Liberals
This is not a case of "Pro-Choice" or "women's rights." The women who have abortions in China, by and large are NOT given the option. They are required to do so by the government. There is no choice. There are no rights.

There are exceptions granted to the "one-child" policy, presuming you are a good communist, but unless you are among the politically correct, you don't qualify.

There are they who would like to see this policy implemented around the world, especially in areas where there are "undesireable" populations. Margret Sanger wanted abortion to be primarily marketed to and performed on blacks to lessen their population.

We joke in this country about requiring a license for some people to have children, usually people we regard as too stupid to raise a child (often those on the opposite side of the political spectrum) but in China, it's no joke. It's all too real.

Reality
China had a choice. They could pull the country out of poverty into the modern world, or they could continue being overwhelmed with an ever expanding population. They have 1.2 billion people. And they've stabilized that population in order to build an industrial state. If they had not done what they are doing, their population today would have at least another 400 million mouths to feed. Some here consider it barborous not to permit unlimited and uncontrolled procreation. Yet it is equally barbarous to fail to understand the causes of poverty in 3rd world countries. We have the examples all around us in such countries. Much of populations of the middle east, Africa, and of some parts of central South America are mired in poverty. Their nations are unable to break out of the cycles in which they are involved due to the simple fact that their populations grow faster than their economies. And many have already expanded beyond the capacity of their agriculture to produce the food necessary - making them permanent wards of the world. 100 million people will starve - of which most are children.

It's very easy for those in industrial societies who have the education and the infrastructure already in place to hold their noses and pontificate about such decisions. Unless, of course, you spend time in Guatemala, India, the Middle East, Africa, and the like.

From where I sit, China made the right decision. The inability of a family to feed and clothe their family is an imposition on the state and the rights of all other families.

The issues the US has with immigration today is directly related to the fact that Mexico and Central America's populations have expanded by a factor of almost 4 X since 1950 - whereas ours has only doubled. And some of the doubling is directly related to the migration of these people to the US. Mexico had 29 million people in 1950, today she has 110 million. Adn so they flee to the US.


Redlac,
If you admire China's policies so much then you should have the courage of your convictions -- go to China, become a citizen, and submit yourself to the government control of all aspects of your life that you think is so appropriate.

If you don't then your post is the very definition of arrogance and bigotry -- claiming that violations of individual rights which you would not dream of submitting to in your own life are fine for those people in other countries. You have no right to sit there in freedom and prosperity while casually declaring that other people are better off enslaved.

China's birth control
People here would scream bloody murder if the Government imposed controls on reproductive rights. but liberals seem to think Chinese women deserve what they get. It's ok for the Chinese government to impose birth control on women who don't want it, but how dare the US government tell an American woman what to do with her body. Most on the left don't seem to care about the baby,

MRBMRB WRITES:
we have no right to criticize what they believe if s correct then they would have to stick their nose into our private affairs.

To the contrary we have every right to criticize the way they treat their people just like they have the right to criticize our form ov government. As for Redlac, the reason those countries have little progress is because the government controls everything for the benefit of the ruling party. If Mexico and Central America had open honest government and free enterprise they would not have the problems they have. The same goes with China. What disturbs me is there are people in this country and on this site who agree with it and would impose this on Americans if given the authority to do so. As of Sharon Stone and her ilk they may be good entertainers but I don't take anything they say seriously.

one individual vs another individual
As unpopular, or unfair?, as it may be, I do suppose that the way the world's population is growing that it is not out of the question that governments may have to control the propagation of their populace...though with movement/migration easier/faster than ever, it is also more likely that the overflow will naturally go toward an already established fully functioning area where there is better chance of "survival" rather than into wilderness where they would truly be on their own and have to struggle for their own survival. And so, I also think that it will not only be a "natural" response but a necessary one for countries to have to control the overflow coming to their shores.
It is only natural and instictive to "go on." But there is only so many any country can take in and take care of w/o undue burden to those already there...so I suppose that it will be commonplace for any country to evolve rules and regulations that will benefit the general society...thereby it stands to reason that individuals may loose their own individual rights.

As it is, my rights are infringed on when I struggle to pay my own bills, cannot afford health care for myself….but am forced thru taxation to provide for fully able bodied individuals?

Fair or Unfair? My rights or theirs?

To all Population Control nuts
There's enough room in this country alone to give the entire planet a place to live. The problem with food shortages comes primarily from the corruption of governments that have the greatest food problems. We have a glut of food in the US. In fact, we have farmers subsidized to NOT grow food in an effort to control prices. We already feed something like 50% of the world, anyway, with our exports of grain and other foodstuffs. And that's just American agriculture.
The "Population Bomb" has not exploded, and is unlikely to. A dramatic reduction in population will cause problems no one is even thinking about. When the population of the elderly exceeds the population of the workers (and thus contributors to government pension plans like social security) we're going to see everyone taxed into poverty. Then we'll be hearing that we need to start killing people when they reach a certain age so the rest of us can survive.

Besides all of that, population control is a fantastic justification for race-based genocide. It sounds good on its face (helps the environment, prevents starvation, whatever) but who gets to decide who lives and who dies? When are there exceptions and who gets them? Do we reject freedom of religion (as China does) to force people who believe abortion to be a great evil to commit abortions in the name of population control? Do we start favoring one political party, or race, or religious belief over another when handing out exceptions?

enough food?
the U.S. had to buy wheat this year for the first time...Australia too as its wheat crop was destroyed by a disease...and with more people, more land is cleared to build houses...potable water is already in shortage...bees & bats are dying off, moths are disappearing...the little things that feed the bigger things.

China's population
China's population control is a bit heavy handed, yes but look at their options. They have a population of 1 billion and it was due to double in a few decades if they had not stepped in and taken action.

Happy Jake is living in the past with food surpluses and subsidies to lower food production in this country. Has he missed the food riots in Egypt, Haiti and other countries. There is a rice shortage plus high fuel prices is pushing the price of food out of reach for people living on $1.00 a day. Australia one of the major rice produces is in its 7 year of severe drought and did not export any rice this year. Bangladesh was hit with a typhoon at harvest time and lost their rice crop. plus Mynamar with their typhoon has lost much of their food storage. One would conclude that the severe storms, droughts and floods warned by climate change scientists might be beginning.

Just how are we going to support the growing population? More mouths to feed, unpredictable climate events, less land to grow crops on as cities sprawl into the country sides. Plus we are running out of fresh water supplies. More people means more demand fuel(what was the last price for a gallon of gas?) , more demand for living space. Go for it Happy Jake. How do you suggest we do it.

population exceeds
When the population of the elderly exceeds the population of the workers...

just see what happens when the 50 to 70% of H.S. dropouts have to go on the rolls cause they can't get decent paying jobs to support themselves in the lifestyles to which they're accustomed.

Typical Liberals
Reading some of the threads here confirms what I have thought about libs for years. You people will go to great lengths to justify any measure the communists take "for the common good" yet when your own President takes a few mild steps to protect the country including you from islamic fanatics he is "shredding the Constitution". No matter what the Chicoms do you approve. Tianimin Square; no problem. Great Leap Forward; they were necessary sacrifices. Cultural Revolution; What ever must be done to preserve the system. I have a radical idea. How about granting the populace freedom? I bet it just may work out do ya think? You people had better be watching what is happening over there because it may find its way over here. A government which has the power to provide everything also has the power to take everything. National healthcare sounds good until you realize some overweight bureaucrat with a bad combover will decide who does and who does not get treatment. As Adam Smith said over two hundred years ago "there is no free lunch somebody pays".

Population and War
Personally, I feel sorry for the people there that can't have more than one child - and I'm glad they can't.

If their population had continued to grow as it was (as many kids as possible rather than one) they would be out of food by now. But there are other countries, such as this one, with food. You can either let your people starve - or go conquere someone with plenty of food. And, when you do, to make the food go further, kill all the captives as well.

I'd rather have the population control than have my own family killed so they can have plenty of food. Sorry but there it is.

Happy Jack:
Yes, we sure do feed a lot of the world. India, for instance, gets a huge portion of their food from us. If they didn't, they would starve since they certainly can't grow enough to feed themselves. Their government tried to place a limit on children too a few years back although not as strict as China. But our government refused to send them the food they needed if they did.

So we give them billions of dollars worth of food a year at our expense. Even then many starve. Is this right? Why are we paying for other people to have children when it is too expensive here to have more than a couple of children? Why do you think the population of people with several generations in the U.S. is shrinking? They have to pay for everyone else to have children. The only growing group in the U.S. that has been here for more than three generations are those on Welfare - where they are paid extra money for each child they have up to eight.

A few years ago it was suggested that instead of giving more money to Welfare recipients if they had more children that they should cut the amount given by $5. There were acusations that the U.S. was trying to commit genocide.

If you are forced to work to support someone else so they can live a life of ease without working, you are a slave. Are you a slave or a master?

Population decline
The alarmists on this thread have conveniently overlooked that Malthus has been irrefutably debunked. Populations actually decline with an increase in wealth and plenty. Underpopulation is the most serious concern facing many western nations. All China needs to implement is increasing economic freedom. Demographics will react accordingly.

The left has adopted an increasingly opportunistic position on China. Why on Earth would a feminist even care about women's rights in America when briefed of their plight in China. This atrocious government's anti-female population control policies have produced an unmanageable gender disparity. 30 million hopeless bachelors will redefine human aggression.

On the plus side, the nature/nurture argument over homosexuality will be definitively solved within 20 years. Thanks China.

Chi-Com's "Bloggers" Worldwide
Reading some of the threads above reminds me of what Judi McLeod said in her latest article:

Scores of stories have been written about the cyber cops who keep bloggers from posting anti-government stories to the Internet in China under penalty of imprisonment or worse.

Little is ever written about the estimated one million secret special editors and commentators trained by the Chinese Communist regime to control `opinions’ on the web around the world.

For details, go to
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/3262

200 million babies murdered there
The mystic dragon is ferocious and forever seeking to crush, devour and trample. Likewise the Regime is ravenous for power and brutal towards life, as we all know.

Talking about brutality, about 80 million people have been killed by the Regime in the “political” upheavals since 1949. And up to 2001, the Regime has murdered 200 million babies by forced abortions, partial births and infanticides under its “one child policy”.

Above is quoted from "Behold, 666 is Here."

Disgusting but anyone wants to know about "baby soup" in Communist China?

China loved by GOP
No owerful labor unions, no gov. regulations, no minimum wage enforcement, this is GOP dreamland. No liberal bloggers, a conservative gov't., all GOP dreams. Polluters controlled by the free market, coal miners safety not protected by Democrats. TV and radio is like Fox News, conservative loyalists. One day China will be changed from inside like the USSR was, and the GOP will proclaim credit, just like they have with Reagan. They lie. lism is the enemy of totalitarianism, be it the USSR, Cuba, China, Bush, Al-Quiada, or Townhall.com.

Realman is right,
the GOP does like minimal regulations, no minimum wage, no labor unions. Now here's what liberals love about the Chinese gov't - forced abortions and gov't clampdown on all liberties that don't conform to what the gov't proclaims thinks.

Hey REALMAN
This is exactly what Obama believes in..Read the link below and check his Illinois voting record.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51 121

eddie...spring hill...fl

Mind our own business
We should stop trying to be the world police and stop sticking our noses in every other country's business. If China wants to have a "one-child policy", then that is their business. Frankly, I'm not even opposed to the one-child policy. China has used it effectively to control it's out of control population boom. As a matter of fact, we could probably use a similar policy here in America to help control some of these women that have 2, 3, 4 children or more out of wedlock with multiple fathers; in some cases by the time they're in their early twenties.
So no Maggie, I'm not going to think about Mahire or the one-child policy when I watch the world's athletes come together in Beijing. I'm going to put politics aside and I'm going to watch and enjoy the Olympics for the athletes and the competition.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.