Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Sunday, February 04, 2007
Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD :: Townhall.com Columnist
Radical Liberal Themes
by Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Certain neurotic themes are dominant in the radical liberal mind’s perceptions of the world. All of them portray the citizen as a suffering child who is victimized, helpless and in need of rescue. All are evident in various liberal platforms. They represent the liberal mind’s transference of childhood dynamics into the world of adult relationships. As expressed in his most passionate political pronouncements, the radical liberal mind believes that:

  • A very large portion of the population is suffering; they are suffering because they are deprived, neglected, exploited or abused.
  • They are suffering because of certain injustices inflicted upon them.
  • They are helpless to stop their suffering.
  • Bad people, such as capitalists and the rich, cause the victims to suffer by depriving, neglecting, exploiting and abusing them.
  • These bad people are villains who must be stopped from preying on their victims.
  • The villains are ruthless, powerful, selfish, cruel and mean spirited.
  • The bad institutions supported by the villains are economic, social and political in nature; they include free market capitalism, basic property rights, strict moral and ethical accountability, reasonable social decorum, personal and financial responsibility, individual sovereignty, and justice based on merit and desert.
  • These bad institutions promote economic enslavement, social discrimination, political disenfranchisement, exploitation of minorities, forced pregnancies, and coercive advertising, among other things.
  • The people are innocent victims; they have no important role in causing their suffering.
  • Modern liberals are heroes whose mission is to rescue the victims from the villains.
  • Modern liberals are compassionate, wise, empathetic and nurturing.
  • Modern liberals are devoted to saving the victims from the villains just as nurturing parents protect their children from harm by others.
  • Like children, most citizens cannot adequately direct or manage their own lives.
  • Most citizens need a powerful liberal government to direct and manage their lives.
  • Because the villains and their institutions are ruthless and powerful, the people need a powerful liberal government, The Modern Parental State, to protect them from the villains and the institutions supported by the villains.
  • The Modern Parental State is the answer to problems created by the villains.
  • The Modern Parental State will rescue the people and protect them from the villains and from other misfortunes.
  • The Modern Parental State will nurture the people by providing for all their needs and desires.
  • The Modern Parental State will blame and punish the villains for their deprivation, neglect, abuse and exploitation of the victims.
  • Much of the suffering of the victims comes from too much freedom in economic markets, which allows the villains to exploit the victims for unjust gain.
  • Proper controls instituted by The Modern Parental State to regulate the markets will prevent the villains from economically exploiting the victims.
  • The Modern Parental State will cure the deprivation, neglect, exploitation and abuse of the victims by taking the wealth, power and status of the villains away from them and redistributing it to the victims.
  • Some of the suffering of the victims comes from too little social freedom and too many restrictions on behavior in social situations.
  • The Modern Parental State will lower the standards of social conduct in order to free the victimized citizen from guilt and from adverse legal consequences when he acts criminally, irresponsibly or offensively.
  • By remaking the institutions of society, The Modern Parental State will liberate the victims from exploitation and oppression by the villains.
  • The libertarian structure of ordered liberty grounded in basic property and contract rights allows the villains to exploit the victims.
  • The Modern Parental State will eliminate these individual rights and create a new political architecture for a secure society modeled on the loving nurturing family.

These and related themes of deprivation and neglect, exploitation and abuse, domination and control, blaming and punishing, caring and caretaking, protection and security, rescuing and nurturing—all are the radical liberal mind’s unconscious projections of early childhood dynamics transferred into the political arenas of adult life. These projections define the transference neurosis of the radical liberal mind:

  • They are the liberal’s projections of a painful neurotic disorder; they are the legacy of his childhood.

  • They represent his desperate longings for attachment, attention, affection, empathy, significance, esteem, adoration, recognition, indulgence, relatedness, guidance, direction, belonging and love.

  • They represent his desperate efforts to heal real emotional wounds that he suffered when he was, in fact, significantly deprived, neglected, exploited or abused.

  • They are his efforts to defend against his suffering by constructing an idealized world of loving care and exemption from responsibility; he seeks a world that will compensate him for the traumas of his childhood, relieve his neediness, indulge his impulses and heal the enduring wounds to his soul.

  • They are distorted perceptions of the real world of economic, social and political processes; the liberal agenda is based on these transference perceptions.

Unfortunately, all of the radical liberal’s efforts based on these perceptions are badly misguided. Because he does not understand the childhood origins of his pain, he projects his neurosis into a contemporary world of imagined villains, victims and heroes. Once he locates himself in this world, he hopes to find in the ministrations of the Modern Parental State what he missed as a child. He may not admit to himself or others that he did, in fact, suffer early wounds. If he does admit this fact, he will not realize that his wounds drive his political views. If he realizes this causal connection, he will not admit it to others.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr, MD is the author of The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago and served for two years as a psychiatrist in the United States Army. He is currently in private practice in the Chicago area.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Lyle Rossiter's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Liberals Diagnosed ---
That Doc is Sick!

There are many Claiming to be Liberal, that don't Fit The REAL Meaning! & Some Conservitives that Harmonize with the Real Meaning Of Liberal.

The Origional Meaning Was: Free Love!(offensive to Control Freeks!!!)

FLM
*** "My point is that it's unwise to dogmatically reject any consideration of having the Governemnt do some new task or service simply because that is Socialism. Each new task must be considered individually. I can't give you a definitive set of criteria to apply against each potential new governemt function, but just by considering examples as I've done above you can recognize that some things are best done by the govt, others by the private sector." ***

Thanks! This is a clear, self-contained idea that we can debate.

I would propose that the "definitive set of criteria" to be used to determine _Federal_ governmental roles is contained in the Constitution.

The Constitution defines the form of the Federal government. Along with establishing election rules (e.g. president must be natively born and older than 34), the constitution defines the roles that the _Federal_ government has. The Ammendments to the Constitution includes the Bill of Rights which provide a set of protections of the citizen from government (e.g. the right to free speech, bear arms, etc).

The Constitution is a set of principles that specify the shape of the _Federal_ government. It doesn't matter if you drive a horse-drawn buggy or a warp-drive spacecraft, the _Federal_ government is responsible for defense and foreign policy. You are protected from indiscriminate search and seizure. You get the idea.

I keep saying _Federal_ because, of course, the shape of the state government is determined by the state, where it doesn't conflict with the specifically enumerated roles of the federal government.

What happens if we decide to expand or contract the role of the federal government? The method proscribed is to change the Constitution through Ammendments (e.g. term limits for president).

This is where the idea of "living and breathing" constitution comes in. New roles have been given to the government without changing the Constitution (e.g. welfare). New rights have been "found" by reinterpreting the Constitution (e.g. the right to privacy).

IMO, these have happened due to political expediency at the time.

What do you think George Washington would have said if he were told that in 200 years, the Federal government would be responsible for retirement and health plans for all seniors?

You may say that Social Security and Medicare are wonderful things that we as a country should do. That's debateable. If you believe Social Security and Medicare should be a federal responsibility, put it in the Constitution.

If you can circumvent the Constitution for your "nice" causes, others can circumvent it for not so nice causes. Look at what has just happened in Venezuela.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.