Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, August 24, 2007
Lorie Byrd :: Townhall.com Columnist
Gwen Stefani Dresses Down
by Lorie Byrd
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
What was the biggest suprise of Election Day?



Recently pop singer Gwen Stefani made news by making what she referred to as a “major sacrifice” by performing her concert in Malaysia with shoulders, legs and belly completely covered. The reason for ditching her usual attire, which often consists of short skirts and midriff-revealing halter tops, was in reaction to protests from the 10,000-member National Union of Malaysian Muslim Students who said such clothing would clash with Islamic culture and values and provide a poor role model for Malaysian youth. The revealing costumes routinely worn by Stefani and other performers are not only found offensive by Muslims. There are many Jewish, Christian and other religions and cultures that discourage immodest clothing, too. Some groups representing those religions have even complained in the past about the bad example being set for girls and young women by so many in the entertainment industry.

So why would Stefani respond to the protests from a Muslim group, while ignoring similar complaints from Christian and other groups? About 60 percent of Malaysia's population is Muslim, while those in the United States identifying themselves as Christian is over 75 percent. The reason Stefani would bow to Muslims protesting her dress therefore could not be about numbers.

Maybe it is an example of the squeaky wheel getting the oil and Christian and other groups have just not complained as loudly as some Muslim groups have. Perhaps no other groups have ever directed their pleas for decency in the entertainment industry specifically at Stefani. Speaking of the protests from the Malaysian Muslim group, Stefani said, “I’ve been in the music industry for 20 years and this is the first time that I’m facing opposition from people who have misunderstood me…I’m not a bad girl.”

Michelle Malkin said Stefani is not a bad girl, “just a dhimmi.” “Dhimmi” is a term used to refer to a non-Muslim living in a country ruled by sharia law who entered a contract to pay respect to and acknowledge Muslim supremacy in return for a guarantee of safety. In other words, maybe it is not a matter of Stefani respecting Muslims more than Christians, but rather a matter of fearing them more. Only she knows whether her decision was made more out of respect for another religion and a foreign culture or out of fear for her safety, or simply if this is the only time anyone specifically asked her to cover up her bare parts. It could just be that simple.

For six years I attended a Christian school with a dress code that required girls to wear skirts no shorter than just above the top of the knee. Girls were allowed to wear slacks to after-school events, but were not allowed to wear shorts. Most visitors to the school honored the dress code as well. There is nothing wrong with voluntarily paying respect to another person or group’s idea of what is appropriate. It does make me wonder, though, what it would take for performers in this country to start showing more respect for the beliefs and ideals of Christian, Jewish and other religions. Leaving aside the religious or cultural aspect even, I wonder what it would take for some of today’s entertainers to listen to moms who don’t want their daughters emulating singers performing in what look like bedazzled undies. Would a protest, or maybe even a boycott, do the trick, or are threats of violence the only thing that gets results?

In the rare instance when individuals today commit violence in the name of Christianity, as some of the abortion clinic bombers in the United States have done, you will hear most Christian groups loudly renounce that violence. Denunciations of violence committed in the name of Islam, whether it be bombings or beheadings of people who refuse to conform to sharia, are generally more scarce and less loud.

I have no quarrel with Gwen Stefani, or anyone else, who makes the decision to dress more modestly out of respect for another’s culture or religion. In the case of an entertainer like Stefani who has many young female fans looking up to them, it can actually be a very good thing. I just wish that it did not take a protest from a Muslim group in a foreign country to make it happen. There are plenty of moms that I hear from on a regular basis right here in America who would like to see a whole lot less of the women their daughters idolize.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lorie Byrd is a Townhall.com columnist and blogs at Wizbang and at LorieByrd.com.

Be the first to read Lorie Byrd's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

reply to dyerje
I, too, hope you come back and see my reply to you. YOu haven't convinced me, because I am well aware of the history of persecution associated with Christianity, as are others. The prominent German historian, Ernst Nolte, goes so far as to atttribute Nazi hatred of the Jews to the everyday exposure to Christianity which most Germans had, and finds that the history of Christianity and the history of anti-Jewish hatred are pretty much different sides of the same phenomenon. Certainly it's no problem to come up with historical examples of Christians imposing all sorts of things on people by force.

You beg the question when you write: "Organizations bearing the name "Christian" that have done that in the past were acting on unbiblical human ideas, not anything found in the gospels, Acts, or epistles."

YOu've already understood Christianity as an embodiment of kindness, goodness, etc. and so you remain oblivious to its other side.

Since no one has shown me that they know the true essence of Christianity, I say that Christianity includes the full range of beliefs, thoughts, values, and actions of human beings who identify themselves as Christians. That means the Inquisition and Mother Teresa, Torquemada alongside the local Methodist church, the snake-handlers in Kentucky and Sir Isaac Newton. All of that is Christianity, historically speaking and all of these folks would argue that they see the truth.

Gestell
This is days late and you probably won't see it, but you are categorically wrong about Christianity in comparison with shari'a.

Christianity does not envision using secular human power to impose its tenets of dress on all. Period. You are projecting Islamic shari'a onto Christianity when you insist that a true Christian would advocate such a thing.

It is not only possible but empirically demonstrable that monotheistic religions differ from each other. There is nothing in Christianity that envisions or justifies using human force to impose the outward signs of belief on people. Organizations bearing the name "Christian" that have done that in the past were acting on unbiblical human ideas, not anything found in the gospels, Acts, or epistles.

Persuading their fellow citizens to vote in ways that accord with Christian principles is the aspiration of American Christians who get involved in politics. Christians have peacefully accepted the decisions of secular government that they find objectionable, even when -- as is often the case -- they are arrived at not through the ballot box but through judicial fiat. Christians nevertheless continue to exercise their right to get political topics readdressed, if that is possible through lawful means.

You're free to imagine what you will about what Christians "should" be doing, but you are not free to attribute those intentions to me, without being countered.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.