Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, July 13, 2007
Lorie Byrd :: Townhall.com Columnist
How Bush Can Save Iraq
by Lorie Byrd
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Over the past four years President Bush has failed to effectively communicate to the public the importance of succeeding in Iraq, and now some Republican senators are going wobbly in the face of low poll numbers. They appear prepared to deny our military even the few months they were told would be given before the September report on the progress of the counteroffensive. The President needs to use everything at his disposal to make the case to the American people that failure in Iraq is not an option. He needs to do it immediately and in a bold fashion.

President Bush held a press conference Thursday morning to discuss the state of operations in Iraq. It was a start, but it is going to take a lot more than talking to reporters in a morning presser to get the message through to the American public. There are too many misconceptions that have been allowed to exist for too many months. It will take a bold and focused effort to be sure the public gets all the information they need to make an informed opinion about the correct course of action to pursue in Iraq.

There are a few points the President needs to hammer over and over again. First he needs to educate the public about the true nature of the “Surge” -- especially that the increase of troop levels in Iraq is only part of the larger counter-offensive effort. In a RedState editorial it was explained that “the increase in troop levels, requested by General Petraeus, was one of many components …or “strategic shifts”… necessary to implement the sweeping new strategy, which radically altered our country’s course in Iraq and sought to solve the problems and shore up the weaknesses which four years of fighting had created and exposed.” Too many Americans believe (because they have been misled to believe) that the surge is simply a matter of throwing more troops into a losing effort to make the same mistakes over and over again, rather than a completely new strategy that is already yielding some progress.

The second thing the President has to do is get the stories of progress through to the public. The Democrats and the media have told the public repeatedly that the war in Iraq is lost -- a failure and a complete disaster. Slowly some reports of progress in Iraq are making it into major media outlets, but they are still not being reported as prominently as they should be. Not only do most Americans not know about the success stories taking place in Anbar province, once considered a lost cause, but many are not aware that any progress is being made anywhere in Iraq.

Another thing the President needs to get across to the public is a point he discussed in the press conference quite effectively. The point he made was that the debate today is not between those who want the troops to come home and those who want to keep them in Iraq. He said that everyone, including him, wants to see them come home and that the debate today is between those who believe the fight is lost or not worth the cost and those who believe the fight can be won and that as difficult as the fight is, the consequences of defeat would be much higher. He needs to explain why a drawdown of forces not linked to success of operations would be a disaster. He also needs to keep repeating that such a determination should be made based on information from military commanders in the field rather than political considerations at home.

Every bit as important as what the message is, is how and when it is delivered. The time to capture the attention of the American people is not at 10:30 in the morning. A prime time television address, or preferably a series of addresses, is the only way to get an unfiltered message through to a large segment of public.

The way the message is delivered is also critical. As passionate and determined as the President is on the subject of Iraq, he often fails to convey that in formal addresses. One format which has been successful for him in the past is to get out of the Oval Office and in front of a live audience. Whether that audience is one assembled somewhere in the White House, or a cheering group on a military base, the feedback he gets from a live audience seems to give the President an energy he never has when reading from a teleprompter. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lorie Byrd is a Townhall.com columnist and blogs at Wizbang and at LorieByrd.com.

Be the first to read Lorie Byrd's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Lorie,
I watched C-SPAN in the wee hours this morning and heard Lt. Gen. John Sattler address the Defense Forum Foundation. He is the man under whose command the peace in Fallujah was secured, and he is now the Joint Chiefs of Staff Strategic Plans and Policy Director.

I recommend him as an excellent speaker who can deliver the goods, so to speak, if the WH decides to take up your wise proposal. Fellow THers will find the speech inpiring, as well.

I was so "charged" after listening to him describe our mission in Iraq, our progress, and the way forward.

Visit C-SPAN.org, Featured Topics, Iraq, and click on Defense Forum Found., Speech on U.S. Strategy in Iraq to view video of event held yesterday.

Iraqi Commitment to Solution
Well, they delayed it a little bit.

The Iraqi parliament decided to ONLY take the month of August off instead of the months of July and August.

So for all the administration supporters of the war, you want to help me explain to the troops why they are fighting so the Iraqi parliament can go on VACATION?

If they aren't worried about putting their government together so we can get out of there as soon as possible, why the hell should our troops be putting their lives on the line?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.