Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, July 06, 2007
Lorie Byrd :: Townhall.com Columnist
Finding the Good News from Iraq
by Lorie Byrd
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


I would love to see more “Arthur Chrenkoff” in my news today. An Australian blogger who wrote a series of blog posts (also carried by the Wall Street Journal) called “Good News from Iraq,” Chrenkoff filled a niche those in the media too often left unaddressed by giving readers information about news from the region that did not consist merely of casualty figures. Chrenkoff scoured media reports and military sources and compiled the “good news” that was often being buried.

The first installment of the “good news” series appeared on May 19, 2004 and ran three pages long. Jeff Jacoby described the “good news” series in a 2005 piece in the Boston Globe: “Chrenkoff’s summaries became must reading for anyone wanting to keep up with more than just the violence and debacles in Iraq… it offered a respite from the grim litany of insurgent violence, Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse, and coalition casualties that the mainstream media’s coverage of the war tends to dwell on.”

He went on to describe a few examples of the kind of news in Chrenkoff’s series that was difficult to find in big media reports. “In Iraq… there was news to cheer: the democratic election of town councils in Dhi Qar province. The publication of 51 million new Ba’ath-free textbooks for Iraqi schoolchildren. The ‘‘brain drain in reverse’’ that was bringing thousands of educated Iraqi expatriates back to their homeland to teach. The revival of Kurdish music, long suppressed under Saddam. The reflooding of the ruined southern marshes. The 3-1 upset soccer victory over Saudi Arabia that meant Iraq was going to the Olympics. And more.”

The “good news” series ran until September 2005 when Chrenkoff began working for an employer whose policy did not allow him to blog. The final installment was 44 pages long. Almost two years later there is still no big media equivalent of the Chrenkoff reports. There is still good news from Iraq to be found though, especially in the new media.

Those telling much of the good news from Iraq today are the milbloggers. Current and former members of the U.S. military, as well as their spouses and parents, are telling their personal stories and those of their friends and loved ones serving in Iraq on blogs. Independent journalists like Michael Yon and Bill Roggio, are doing some incredible reporting from Iraq. Their reports, which include the good, the bad and the ugly from the region, are very popular with those getting their news from the internet.

Those in the “big media” do report some of the progress being made in Iraq -- most recently reporting results of the ongoing troop “surge.” Still too frequently, though, good news from the region is ignored. There is no shortage of casualty “milestones” being reported in the mainstream media, but the amazing feats of the men and women of the U.S. military receive far too little attention.

Earlier this week, Tony Snow held a press conference which he began by describing some developments in Iraq. As John Hinderaker at Powerline blog noted, Snow reported that the President had phone calls with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the three other members of the presidency council about ongoing political progress and developments in Iraq. Snow said that the members of the presidency council in Iraq reported that “they have now transmitted to the council of representatives, their legislature, the oil law, and are hoping quite soon to have a related piece of legislation, one that has to deal with the distribution of oil and hydrocarbon revenues, before the legislature quite soon.”

Snow went on to talk about high re-enlistment rates, highlighting a ceremony on July 4th at Camp Victory in Baghdad in which more than 500 troops serving in Iraq, including many on their second or third tours of duty there, re-enlisted. Snow cited numbers indicating that troops who have served in Iraq continue to re-enlist in higher numbers than those throughout the military generally.

Hinderaker wrote that Snow then opened the floor to questions, but that the White House press corps had not a single question on the reports from Iraq. Instead what followed were 92 questions about Scooter Libby. Those were not the only questions though. There were some about other topics – a total of three non-Libby questions.

Jeff Jacoby quoted the following from Chrenkoff’s farewell post: ‘‘I don’t know what Iraq and Afghanistan will look like in five or 10 years’ time, but I hope for the best. If, despite all the horrendous problems and challenges, both countries manage to make it through and join the international family of normal, decent, and peaceful nations,’’ many people will wonder how they managed to get there. ‘‘But you, who have read these round-ups for the past year and a half, will not be surprised.’’

Unfortunately there are far too many relying only on the mainstream media for news from Iraq who would be incredibly surprised to learn there is any news from there other than complete disaster and despair. Bad news captures most of the headlines. The public deserves the whole story from Iraq – including the good news.

 

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lorie Byrd is a Townhall.com columnist and blogs at Wizbang and at LorieByrd.com.

Be the first to read Lorie Byrd's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

It Seems Strange...
..that the great standard bearer for the war in Iraq, Fox News, seems to have given up on reporting from there. Admittedly I only see what they are covering on the website, the television coverage might be more comprehensive. The good people there seem to prefer instead to keep us abreast of the slalcious activities of Ms Spears, Hilton, Lohan etc.
As I have said previously on these pages, I don't know whther the MSM in the US is liberal/conservative but whatever else it is, it is certainly vacuous and facile. Sady we seem to be following a similar path in the UK

be realistic--and skeptical
Of course I want us to win in Iraq.

But I want to be realistic about the situation there.

Bill Roggio's "reporting" isn't what the mainstream media would call good reporting. He doesn't verify things from two independent sources. Instead, his "reporting" often consists of paraphrases of official Multinational Forces communiques. For example, follow the links off of this story of his:

http://billroggio.com/dailyiraqreport/2007/07/iraq_report_courting_the_tribe.php

and you'll see they point to dispatches from the official website http://www.mnf-iraq.com/

So Roggio is often nothing more than a mouthpiece for the Pentagon's official account. And I don't need him for that, since I can go to that website (or to the Pentagon main site http://www.defenselink.mil/) whenever I want.

Looking back over what Roggio wrote in past years, one could never tell from what he wrote that anything was wrong in Iraq: We're winning, the enemy is retreating, the Iraqis are rebuilting, we're winning, the enemy is retreating, the Iraqis are rebuilding, over and over, that's all he ever wrote about. You couldn't figure out from what he was "reporting" that Bush was going to admit to the nation in January 2006 that things weren't working out; that Bush was going to fire Rumsfeld and Casey; that Bush was going to completely change tactics and order a surge.

The much-maligned, liberal media did get this one right. Maybe not for the right reasons--they've always hated Bush--but they did get it right: Bush's early projections and plans for Iraq did NOT work out as he had hoped, and they were the first to report it.

Iraq is not South Africa
tanabear writes: "They need optimistic appraisals regarding Iraq for political reasons."

There actually is good news coming out of Iraq--on the battlefield. The surge has defeated al-Qaeda and chased them out of a number of neighborhoods where they were strong before.

The problem has never been with our military--they can defeat any adversary on an open battlefield, in a one-on-one contest. Even liberals have no doubt about that.

The doubts come in with the nation-building aspect. Does the Shiite-dominated Baghdad government want to govern like a pluralistic democracy, or like a Shiite-dominated semi-theocracy? Do they want reconciliation with the Sunnis, or do they want vengeance?

Bush was apparently hoping for something like South Africa: The black majority took power from the white minority that had oppressed them, but they did not wreak vengeance on the whites but instead decided to live in peace.

But Bush forgot one thing: Nelson Mandela had preached reconciliation, not jihad.

That's one of those little cultural issues about Islam that Bush tries hard to overlook.

tanabear
You lack a fundemental understanding of the reality of war. There is good news aplenty, but you have to go and blog with the soldiers to hear it. As to the surge...How do you know whether it's working or not? You don't since very little has been reported on it. I know they have cleared out some Al Qaida, but little else.

The MSM is LYING!
Whou Woulda Thunk It?

SteveL
You are correct and incorrect. It wasn't that Casey and Rumsfield were totally inaccurate. It was we do not have the patience for that kind of war. I do agree a change of plan was well in order. Neither could win for losing in this situation. If we had completely leveled that country, which we are capable, then what would the MSM do? Hoot and holler to high heaven. Bremmer's mistakes also seriously wrong footed the game plan and made it difficult if not impossible to recover. Petrawus is the man for the job. Question is can Bush put enough pressure on the Iraqi govt. to get their act together? Considering the Muslim mentality I wonder.

Awww, come on!
Let's get real.

The most logical explanation for the fact that there is very little good news out of Iraq is that very little good is happening in Iraq.

Unless of course you happen to be a Shiite religious zealot in Iran.

It is stupid to blame the MSM for this. The NY Times for example has published a number of stories about good things during the surge buildup, many on the front page. Such as Sunnis beginning to work with our military against Al Qaeda, and signs that in many areas a heavy US troop presence can lead to a decrease in Iraqi vs. Iraqi violence.

So they DO report the good news when it happens. The point is that it doesn't happen very often.

As for the oil law passage touted in the article, it is just not time to say this is a success yet. It has been in the works for almost 2 years at least and is still a long way from being accepted by all the parties in Iraq and actually implemented.

tanabear
Good news is us killing terrorists. Don't cha think it's just a little funny that four years into this I can not think of one article or tv news report that has reported how many of the enemy we've eliminated? If we kill five hundred terrorists tommorrow and eight Americans die in the process then all we here at home will be about is how eight Americans died for a pointless war for oil to benefit Bush. And since you have no recognizance of history, let me remind you that we did not go to Iraq just because of WMD, even though Saddam had them (and we know this because he used them on his own people). WMD was one of about five reasons we went there, and if you would have listened you would know that Bush has said over and over and over and over that this is a conflict which will last far beyond his own presidency.

Hank, that's part of the problem...
Who are the terrorists? Who are our enemies? Who is just getting caught up in the crossfire. Are the militias, charged by default with protecting their land since the central gov't is not capable of doing it, terrorists? The former Baathists, are they terrorists?
This points to why this war is such a disaster and one more reason it should not have been initiated. If we point our incredibly effective armed forces at the enemy, we will always win. Problem is, in a war environment like this, we can't tell who the enemy is. Terrorists don't exactly wear uni's. So we are left with estimates of over half a million Iraqi dead.
If I told you twenty thousand of those were terrorists, would that make you happy? I sincerely hope not.

Peace be with you.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/

Good reporting
I remember laughing at every article I read in the American media.

American reporters regularly assume that every person they talk to, anywhere in the world, is protected by the bill of rights. Hence, when reporting from places where this principles don't apply they often end up repeating what people afraid, coerced, and blackmailed say, not because is the truth, but because they are too afraid of the consequences of not saying what is safe to say.

Secondly, American reporters, like the rest of Americans, are obssessed with not appearing bias, racist or discrimminatory against non-Europeans. So they will respectfully report as Gospel the most outlandish expressions from any non-white pond scum.

Example; The US media would not report China's interventionism and neo-imperialism in Africa.

China's cuddly relationship with the regime in Sudan is a well kept secret.

tanabear
Why so quick to discount any good news the troops know? Because it doesn't fit the template. We knew early on what we saw and new for a fact wasn't getting told. Since the libs love he body count so much how come we never get a count on the number of insurgents sent to their just reward? When I went to leadership school we ran the numbers during WWII the average loss was 300 a month. By lib standards we should have quit a few months into this thing. Libs want this lost and are doing everything possible to ensure a loss. Everything they have said mirrors what the terror organizations have said.

Tanabear WMD's were not the sole reason for going to war there were 17, but I ask you we knew He had them before even Pres. Clinton,VP Gore, Kerry, Hillary and other Dems are on tape saying as much and saying Saddam must be stopped. What happened to the WMD's? Did Saddam just turn into a loveable little smurf and destroy them. The Oil for Food program wasn't working, he cheated and beat it 8 ways from Sunday. What happened to the WMD's?

I digress, what the troops say and have seen is of no merit, yes trust the MSM "troops are desecrating the Koran a Gitmo" story which turned out to be false.

The template is "its all bad, the war is lost, Bush is like Hitler, I thought it was the the work of Nazis, Stalin, or Pol Pot, Bush is lying, if you don't go to school you'll end up in Iraq (doing something stupid like fighting for your country).

I not saying you have to agree with it, just don't help the enemy.

I know if you can stick it to the Pres. then its worth it for the Dems.


KC
MSGT USAF (Ret. 2005)

General warns against Iraq withdrawal

As much as I think Bush’s strategy has been a failure in the Middle East I fear a pullout with no plan would lead to a disaster. The key is changing our goals to stabilizing Iraq not forcing tribes that have been killing each other since 700 AD to function as a representative democracy!

Michael O’Hanlon, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Edward Joseph of Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies both warn that an early withdraw of troops could lead to an regional civil war. Yet they disagree with Bush’s strategy of forcing a strong central government in Iraq. What do you think?

WASHINGTON (AP) — As pressure builds for a change in Iraq policy, a top U.S. commander there warned Friday that drawing down troops too soon would leave the country “a mess.”
“You’d find the enemy regaining ground, re-establishing sanctuary, building more” roadside bombs, Maj. Gen. Rick Lynch told a Pentagon news conference. “The violence would escalate. It’d be a mess.”

Lynch was responding to a question on the possible effects if officials were to decide not to extend beyond the summer the troop buildup President Bush ordered early this year.
Bush sent an additional 30,000 troops to try to pacify Baghdad and wants Congress to wait until September for an assessment on how it’s working. But an increasing number of U.S. lawmakers are already convinced the policy is failing and should be changed.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/general-warns-against-iraq-withdrawal

“Islam vs. Islamist”
I found this review of the movie called “Islam vs. Islamist” on a blog called “A View from the Right”. The movie is very controversial, in fact PBS who helped fund the movie, refused to show it during prime time.

The part I find interesting about this review is that it points out the flaws in NEOCON logic, as well as the LEFT, on the Middle East. NEOCONS think we can convert the culture to be like the West and the LEFT believes in “happy talk” about the issues with Islam. Please read and tell us what you think.

“Islam versus Islamists: Voices from the Muslim Center,” a movie that was produced by Frank Gaffney for the current PBS series on Islam but was then rejected by PBS, was shown in a special screening in a Manhattan movie theater last evening to which I was invited. The movie is very good, and it is a scandal that PBS has spiked it. It consists largely of interviews with various hard-line Muslims in North America and Europe who explain very clearly what they’re about: the Islamization of the societies in which they live, something to which they are commanded by their religion and which, as one of them happily puts it, their host societies have given them the “margin” to pursue. Alongside these very confident and articulate exponents of sharia, several moderate Muslims, the heroes of the movie, are featured. In a telling pattern (the significance of which the filmmakers themselves don’t seem to catch, see below), after the movie describes and interviews each of these moderates, we are told that the entire Muslim community in the city where each moderate lives is against him, is hostile to him, and sees him as not a true Muslim. In one instance, the moderate Muslim in Paris has a 24 hour a day security detail to protect his life from his fellow Muslims who he revealed in a film he made about them.

READ MORE

http://controlcongress.com/uncategorized/%e2%80%9cislam-vs-islamist%e2%80%9d

Thank You Lori Byrd
I thank Lori Byrd for your article. It was appreciated by this father of a U.S. Army First Lieutenant (with Ranger tab) serving as a platoon leader in Iraq. Those of us who have flesh and blood in the fight know that there is good news and know the courage of our military men and women in harm's way.

As for you left wing defeatist trolls on this site, go to h3ll.

Islam is not a peaceful religion
The violence in Iraq will continue until one of the versions of Islam takes complete authoritarian control of the country, or until it becomes an insignificant political force anywhere in the region. Muslims seem to settle every matter in their whole society with violence. They even fire weapons into the air to possible kill someone, when the bullet lands, when they are happy. We are not talking about our definition of civility here.
Could it be, though, the large number of Americans who are not supportive of the war could be the result of some biased reporting by the downstream media, meant to do just that? The jumping to conclusions, exaggerating, and straight up lying about Iraq is also being done by some members of our government. I gotta go throw up.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.