Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, June 22, 2007
Lorie Byrd :: Townhall.com Columnist
Vice President Steele?
by Lorie Byrd
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


Even though the 2008 presidential campaign is in full swing, I have not heard a lot of talk about who the most likely vice presidential candidates will be. So far that talk has been largely limited to discussion of the second (and third) tier presidential hopefuls who have been getting exposure through the debates. I expect my favorite though, Michael Steele, will be getting plenty of VP buzz as the election nears.

Since February of this year, Steele has served as chairman of GOPAC. Among other things he was an attorney, founder of a business and legal consulting firm, and Chairman of the Maryland Republican Party before serving as Lieutenant Governor of Maryland beginning in January 2003. In 2006, he was the Republican nominee for United States Senate in Maryland.

I have been a big Steele fan for several years now. On election night 2006 I knew Republicans would be taking some big losses, but was hopeful that Steele would win the Maryland Senate race. Steele’s loss in that race was the toughest of the night for me. The fact that he was competitive in an overwhelmingly Democratic state was impressive, which made the loss in some ways even harder. Although he did not win the race, Steele ran an excellent campaign, which included some amazing ads. His performance in the debates was impressive, as well. During the course of that campaign Steele showed himself to be a star on the national stage.

The Republican candidates for President and Vice President in 2008 need to be excellent communicators. One of the biggest failings of the Bush presidency has been the inability to effectively communicate. Michael Steele is one of the best communicators the Republican party has today. Not only did I see that in his innovative television advertisements and campaign appearances, but in a speech I watched him give in North Carolina recently.

In April I attended the Civitas Institute's Conservative Leadership Conference and heard some excellent speakers, including presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani. No one, however, was any more impressive than Michael Steele. In the speech he talked about the opportunity he found in the Republican party. He was funny and energetic and got a wildly enthusiastic response.

Steele came from a family of Democrats, but was attracted to the Republican party. He once said "I grew up in an FDR-JFK-LBJ household and I was a Democrat for maybe 15 minutes. The first election that I could vote in was 1976. I was impressed by the peanut farmer from Georgia, but even more impressed by Ronald Reagan. He had the same values as my mother. It just clicked with me." That makes him more qualified than most to explain to others what the party can offer them.

Most impressive to me was the optimistic way Steele described conservatism. He also used humor to good advantage, telling a joke that illustrated his belief that the Republican party offers opportunity, while the Democrats offer only hope. He gave an amusing illustration with the joke about a conservative and a liberal walking down the street and coming upon a homeless man. He said the conservative handed him his business card and invited him to come to his office to talk about a job, then he handed him twenty dollars. The liberal, not wanting to be outdone, pointed the man to the nearest welfare office and then handed him fifty dollars -- from the conservative's pocket.

If I had any doubt, that speech convinced me that Steele is as excellent a communicator in person as he is on television. Scott Elliott of Election Projection.com watched the speech with me and later wrote that Steele would be an excellent president. I won’t say Steele is “articulate” because evidently you are not allowed to use that word to describe a black person without being branded a racist, but he is an incredibly powerful speaker. I guess I forgot to mention earlier that he also happens to be a black Republican.

Dick Morris believes Hillary Clinton has a good chance of winning the presidency even though her poll numbers can’t seem to break the 50 percent mark and she has high negatives among likely voters. Morris says that traditional polls don’t matter as much in her case because the fact that she is a woman means that many of those who do not usually bother to vote will turn out to vote for the first woman president.

I expect the same will be the case when it comes to a black candidate for president or vice president. Steele increased the percentage of black voters pulling the Republican lever in Maryland in 2006. I have no doubt he would do the same nationwide. What I love about Steele though is that he does not run as an “identity politics” candidate.

During his Senate run, Steele was asked if being African-American, Republican, Catholic, and pro-life put him into a box. He answered, “It puts me in the mainstream of America, baby. What you just laid out is one way to describe Michael Steele. The other way to describe him is he's a brother who cares about the working man and woman. As an African-American, I think it's time that we respect the fact that there is a wide range of opinion and diversity of thought.”

In response to a question about whether or not conservatism has appeal in the black community, he said, “Everyone will tell you, at least off the record, that the majority of African-Americans are conservative. They’re God-fearing, church-going conservatives when it comes to a host of issues. I get sick and tired of seeing people trying to pejoratively put us in a box and say we all think and feel and believe the same thing, the same way. Black leadership is very different from everyday black folks — trust me.”

One last point for those who are still not convinced that Steele would be an amazing addition to a presidential ticket -- he is young and tall and good looking. Those things probably shouldn’t matter, but we all know they do.

Michael Steele is a proud conservative Republican who not only knows why he believes what he does, but he knows how to explain it to others in such a way that it makes sense. If that is not what is needed in the Republican party today, I don’t know what is.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lorie Byrd is a Townhall.com columnist and blogs at Wizbang and at LorieByrd.com.

Be the first to read Lorie Byrd's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Steele as Veep
I couldn't agree with the writer more. I have found Michael Steele an impressive speaker since I first heard of him during the last Republican convention. I think he was by far the best speaker. He was however, overshadowed in the press by Arnold and from the other side by Obama. His speach was impassioned and very motivating. He is a truly eloquent speaker who can get the conservative message through to the masses.

I would love to see a Fred Thompson/Michael Steele or Newt/ Steele ticket in 2008. I think intellectually either one of these would destroy either Hillary et al.

Great choice, he scares the socialists.
He'd get my vote.

We in the GOP need solidly grounded conservatives, joyful warriors in the battle of ideas.

Mr Steele so terrifies the left that during the MD Senate campaign, Senator Schumer's goon squad illegally obtained his credit report to look to smear the man. ( http://michellemalkin.com/2005/09/22/a-despicable-democrat-dirty-trick/ )

A great choice for either part of the ticket, he doesn't have much less experience than the leading Democrats in the race.

Palin or Steele, Yes
The two candidates for vice president that I've mentioned the most are conservative Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska and conservative Michael Steele of Maryland. The problem for the Republican "base," which consists mainly of white males and women without a college education is that they're not especially friendly to a female candidate or, heaven forfend, a Black one. They have to get over that.

My support of Palin and Steele is based on the fact that the Republican is a shrunken shell of its former self (in fact, of what it was in 2004). As one of my readers put it, "the (tiny) base has grown while the Party has declined." To get this point across to the base itself is a little like trying to teach trigonometry to an orangutang, but every survey reflects the fact that it is accurate. The 2006 election illustrated the point.

But why not our usual ticket of two aging white males in gray suits? Because you don't beat a dynamic ticket with a lethargic one. And the Hillary ticket (Clinton-Obama? Clinton-Richardson?) is going to be a dynamic one and hard to beat. Even Rush Limbaugh has said that Mrs. Clinton has an 80% chance of getting elected.

I've been a strong proponent of Mrs. Palin because, with her attractiveness, atriculateness, and political toughness, she could change the equation. She could indicate by her presence that the Republican Party wants to reach out to groups in addition to our beloved white males -- who themselves are less inclined to vote Republican as we found in 2006.

The U.S. Census Bureau recently said that that one-in-three Americans is a member of a minority group, mainly Hispanics and Blacks. What do we offer that group? If our answer is two geriatric Caucasians, 9 in 10 will turn away from us. What about another group we have trouble with, women professionals? Lorie Byrd will vote for the Republican, but I can't think of many more professionals who would. We've also had trouble recently with younger voters and and some evangelicals.

Sarah Palin would appeal to these groups -- all of them to a greater or lesser degree. So, I admit, would Michael Steele.

You don't win elections by expressing your anger and scratching your ideological itches. You get it by reaching out to people in such a way that they're inclined to vote for you. If you don't do that, you get to sit on the sidelines and complain, which appears to be too many people's stock-in-trade.

In any case, I salute Lorie, who's terrific, for writing an essay that should cause people to think. Without fresh faces, we're going to end up with some very sad looks.

steve

can't nominate two Northerners
Both Giuliani and Romney are Northerners. If either of them becomes the GOP, that alone is jarring enough because the GOP's center of gravity is in the Sun Belt, as we all know.

Then to have a running mate like Palin of Alaska or Steele of Maryland who is not from the Sun Belt either would be doubly jarring, since that's not where the GOP is. The GOP's strength isn't east or north, it's south and west.

So if Giuliani were the nominee, you had better find him a running mate from the Sun Belt somewhere.

VP?
The GOP does not have the luxury of thinking about the VP spot. No election has ever been won or lost because of the VP on the ticket.

The GOP does not have a candidate who can win the nomination and can then win in the general election. Thompson, maybe.

Get on the ball, GOP, or get ready to say "Madame President" for four years.

Michael Steele
I agree with Lori Byrd. A couple of months ago I emailed Mr. Steele and invited him to move to Virginia so he could challenge our RINO in residence, John Warner, in the 2008 Republican Senatorial primary. Michael Steele is impressive as a speaker, a candidate, and as a man. His race has nothing to do with that: I don't know whether being "a person of color" will be a positive or a negative in a national race, but I think his attibutes will make all Republicans again proud of their party. How can it not? He came close to winning in the People's Republic of Maryland.

Michael Steele
People I know, which includes me, are completely unimpressed by the official candidates for nomination in both parties (beyond disliking Hillary of course.). That is the reason Thompson is so popular - the complete lack interest in the announced candidates. Steele would change that. He would make a great candidate and, hopefully, a better presidential candidate than we have seen recently. (When you cry about Bush, think of the alternatives the Democrats presented.) Bill D.

I support the Man of Steele
Nilsson, simmer down. I immediately know to discridit an opinion when I see the term "neocon" thrown about.

Could Steele be President? He'd make a better one than any of the Democratic candidates. You appear to be stuck in Democrat race-pandering mode. Noone here cares that Michael Steele is black. We care about him for his solid conservatism and effective communication abilities. Since he is black, yeah, his opinions on a few issues are going to be different than his caucaisian Republican brethren, it's called "thinking with your own mind." Your kinds of rants show that you've given in to the race baiters of the left. The GOP is the white male party? Uh, yeah, say hello to the Reid/Kennedy/Clinton/Edwards/Kerry/Schumer/Pelosi run democratic party. Rich, White, and Liberal is the name of the game.

And is anyone really going to criticize Steele as the posterboy for the White Man when they're so busy lauding Barack Obama? As you said, the two are basically the same in background, the difference being that Barack is a bought-and-sold socialist and Steele is a didicated conservative.

Besides Nilsson, the "Threatening Negro" has already run several times in the form of Al Sharpton. If you actually recall Steele's campaign, he got the black leaders in New Jersey to stand in support of him. The man can make things happen. Were he not in an ultra-blue state, he probably would have been elected easily. As it was, the election was down to the wire.

NO MORE SOUTHERNERS
I cannot listen to another "SOUTHERNER"!For the past 12 years,that I have been in America,there has been a President from the "SOUTH".I would rather vote for the "DEVIL" than VOTE for another SOUTHERNER..Maryland was the center of the RACIST SOUTH.Therefore,I could NEVER vote for Mr.Steele or any other "SOUTHERNER".NOOW YALL COM BRACK!HEAN!What is that "STUPID"?

Killer
I have something equally as intelligent as your comments to say to you: Bite my southern A$$!

White Bush-haters sank Steele
Steele, along with Governor Erhlich, had a respectable term in office, one worthy of vaulting him to a Senate seat.

The only reason Steele lost his senatorial bid in Maryland was the strong anti-Bush vote. Were it not for the media-manipulated, fickle voters who supported the war and then turned on the President, Steele would be doing an excellent job as a U.S. Senator today.

Popular Baltimore radio talk-show host Ron Smith--an insufferably arrogant, quasi-erudite, Ron-Paul Libertarian--has sabotaged the conservative movement in Maryland, diminishing the viability of virtually any Republican who doesn't publicly denounce Bush.

Steele did increase the black vote for the GOP. It was the idiotic, anti-war white folks who turned on Bush that sent Ben Cardin to the Senate.



killer
You are a stereo-typing ignorant bigot. Get off this board!

For steve
The US' "Florentyna Kane"*** ain't gonna come out of the current crop of Dems either.

***The first female US president ever mentioned in fiction, courtesy of Brit author Jeffrey Archer in "The Prodigal Daughter" and "Shall We Tell The President?".

Great article
Had never thought about Steele before. My lead two for President are Thompson and Newt. I always hoped that Newt could at least get the VP nod. However Steele would make an excellent addition to the ticket.

VP Steele
Congrats, Lorie, for your insightful column on potential VP Michael Steele.

I made a point of speaking to him at the Media Research Center's gala here Inside the Beltway last March, when I startled him (he graciously laughed) with my dream ticket for 2008: Thompson/Steele (Fred/Mike, if you will).

If the Republican powers-that-be manage to get their act together (alas, no guarantee), we would indeed have an extremely strong national ticket.

Geographic problems...
Michael Steele is extremely impressive, but unless the nominee is Fred Thompson or John McCain, it won't be geographically feasible.

Replies
Chopper John – Born & Raised in Appalachia Dittoes!
LoLo – To the point as ever :)!
Killer – You are so stupid that you have to study for a Blood Test.
TownHallers– In a Midnight Navy Blue State, Steele got 48% of the vote. I checked the numbers and it look like what cost him was apathy, stupidity or laziness. He & Bob Ehrlich solidly carried Maryland in 2002 but lost in 2006 by 8% COMBINED! Steele is sharp, self-made and CONSERVATIVE! You know he is good when Schmuck Schumer sends his Liberal Goons to dig up dirt on him.

PS Schumer’s Goons couldn’t find ANY DIRT!

Bill D.
I agree, and I think Steele as a prez candidate would bring a dynamic to the debates that isn't completely missing but definately isn't there in large quantity.

Steele is very well spoken and in that department would whip Giuliani, McCain... well, let's just say he's on par with Romney in that department.

Steele/Thompson or Thompson/Steele would be an unstoppable flying freight train on the speech circuit. The cure for your everyday Obama platitudes and Hillary's polylinguistic shreiking.

Speaking of
Obama and Hitlery, check out this t-shirt:

http://www.tshirthell.com/store/product.php?productid=927

May have to pick up one or ten.

Steve,...
...you don't get out much do you? To make the claim that:..

.."the Republican "base," which consists mainly of white males and women without a college education is that they're not especially friendly to a female candidate or, heaven for fend, a Black one."...

...is just not true.

Dr. Condoleezza Rice could easily be elected president of the United States by conservative Republicans, her Bush baggage notwithstanding.

Your condescending and arrogant attitude toward conservative Republicans is misplaced. In my experience, its the Country Club Republicans, both male and female, that are the real closet racists and misogynists in the party. Your slander the "base" reveals a lot about yourself. You are nothing more than a white collar bigot.

liberals
We all know from experience that liberals are less tolerant and more ignorant than conservatives. The definition of being a liberal is three-fold: 1) Being close-minded and not listening to criticism, 2) Be easily duped by calls for emotional radicalism, and 3) Having never taken a class in classic economics.

Good Idea
I really, really like Michael Steele. He is a good man and a strong conservative. He would make an excellent VP. I want Thompson to have the nomination and for sometime I have wanted Duncan Hunter to be the VP. But the more I think about it, Steele would make a good choice too. Hunter is invaluible to us in the House. His work their is exemplary. Having him be the VP would undermind what he could do for America.

Well just thinking out loud. Any thoughts, anyone? I don't know if this Sarah Palin has the name recognition to help much.

Oh and one last thing, Hillary won't win. Dick Morris has been in the belt way too long. In France the socialist woman Royal didn't win and even lost the women's vote by like 4 points. Many people don't want a our first woman president to be Hillary. I won't mind a woman in the oval office, as long as she is a conservative Republican...

Palin and Steele - Building a Bench
For those who say a VP nomination doesn't matter, I'd disagree. The Republicans have done a horrible job at picking VPs, so one could argue they don't matter, since we seem to win most of the time, despite our proclivity for poor choices.

But the VP pick does add (or subtract) energy and momentum for a ticket. Gore's choice of Leiberman was what made him competitive in 2000. Before that, he was getting beat handily in all the polls and had no shot in Florida. So, yes, the VP choice can and does matter.

Palin and Steele add a daynamic energy to the ticket and help us in our weak spots - center-right women and minorities. They also show the party is moving away from the tradition of election boring white men who do more harm than help to the ticket.

Let's face it, what the GOP has been doing in the past when it comes to picking running mates isn't working. Dole, Quayle, Kemp... Palin and Steele are better than any of those choices.

Also, and equally important, giving Palin or Steele a national platform will give the GOP energy going forward. We need to be thinking of this election, and also the elections to come. Cheney has been a good VP, but Bush wasn't looking to the future when he made this choice. We need to look at the future.

It's time to stop thinking geographically and start thinking in terms of what kind of party we want for the future. This article is an excellent step toward looking long-term thinking.

VP
I agree that the VP choice really can make a difference. I think the choice of Cheney helped Bush in 2000 when there was concern that Bush did not have the experience. Cheney provided that experience to the point that many joked that Cheney really ran things.

I don't get some of the comments on southerners above(and I am southern). First, I have never thought of Maryland as a southern state. Maybe those in the north think of it that way, but being from NC, I think of Maryland being borderline yankee territory. Probably just my bias though. I don't think the GOP has to have a southerner on the ticket because they will win most of the red states easily anyway. The Dems are the ones that have needed a southerner on the ticket.

I didn't make the point directly in the column, but with some candidates running for president that are either pro-choice or squishy on the subject, Steele would provide a great pro-life addition.




As a Virginia resident...

The only time I wished I lived in Maryland was during the last election -- so I could have voted for Steele. His TV ads were outstanding! They were fresh, humorous, and highly original-- not the uusual "Vote for me -- I'm not him" stuff that passes for campainn spots these days.

The idea of a Vice President Steele is absolutely
BRILLIANT! And, best of all, four to eight years later he could become PRESIDENT Steele!

Way ta go!!!

TYPO ALERT

I meant USUAL -- not UUSUAL. (I DID proofread, but the font is so darn small....)

(Rev.) Jackson's Worst Nightmare
Michael Steele appears to be everything this country needs in a vice-president, regardless of his skin color; maybe enough so to swing many politically moderate votes to the Republicans. This could scare that very LOUD segment of the left; the ones who will simply declare ANY conservative Black candidate an "OREO," no matter what his qualifications are. If it's Democrats, it's "diversity;" if it's us, it's shameless pandering.
It could be exciting; Run Michael Run!


Agreed
Mr Steele would be the "chicken soup for the conservative's soul" as a VP candidate. This is a choice that signifies that the RNC is serious about listening to their base. I would also like to see Rick Santorum considered as a true conservative choice but he does bear the stench of the GOP-led congress and their profligate spending.

An Excellent VP Choice
Steele as VP on the Republican ticket sounds like a real winner to me. Some posts in the past have suggested J C Watts and, although I don’t know either man in depth, I assume both to have the conservative attributes that would be attractive to the majority of Republican voters. With such excellent black candidates, I think it’s time to bring one of them to the Republican ticket as VP - and then go on to President in 8 years. I’m not talking about a token black on the ticket to try to get the black vote. Steele’s experience and perspective would be valuable in addressing all of the issues facing our nation. Republicans (and conservatives) have a big opportunity to turn things around and head this country in the right direction if we nominate and elect candidates who have what it takes to get the job done right.

For those who think Southerners won’t vote for a black, I say: Wake up! You aren’t living in the real world! The majority of white Southerners vote for candidates based on their support of traditional American values – not based on the color of their skin.

If not now...
when? The R's need to do something bold this time around or say goodbye to the White House. In 08 most of the states are set on who they will go with. The R's need to plan accordingly. Throwing up the same old will not get it done. Great thought on Steele. Keep digging and let's find as many options as possible.

Fast Learner

Michael Steele: "I grew up in an FDR-JFK-LBJ household and I was a Democrat for maybe 15 minutes. The first election that I could vote in was 1976. I was impressed by the peanut farmer from Georgia, but even more impressed by Ronald Reagan. He had the same values as my mother. It just clicked with me."

Fifteen minutes? Speaking as another mid-40's guy who also "grew up in an FDR-JFK-LBJ household" it took me fifteen years! And I didn't have to deal with the societal assumptions that command American blacks to think and vote only one way.

What am impressive guy. I would be delighted to see Mr. Steele as a VP candidate, or frankly in ANY position of leadership for our great nation.

Terrific article, Ms. Byrd.

Go Mikey!
Your "base" wont go for Mr. Steele -- not any more than a Mormon, a Libertarian, or a cross-dressing New Yorker. Well, maybe if he was on a tv series . . .

It would be great entertainment if he ran, though!

Black Courage
I have previously stated that I asked Thomas Sowell to please get every Black clergyman and leaders in general to join with us to decry this bill S 1348 or child of it.

I, also, think Mr. Steele, as described, would make an excellent candidate for the Repubs. We need leadership and appeal to the voters. Dole lost, for as much as anything, lack of appeal to a large cross section of the populace.

We would be remiss if we didn't support any good candidate who has speaking ability, wit, presence and is youngish. Sorry McCain and brethren. If you're much over sixty (I am), white with white hair, talk like a politician, spent too much time inside the beltway and generally suck; well you're not going to get the votes.

Steele is good, BUT
I prefer J.C. Watts as the VP choice. However, assuming Obama is going to be the democratic option I'll settle for anyone with an IQ over 40 is all it'll take to expose him as the lover of communism he is. The problem is in this sad day and age about 40% of Americans are communists although they prefer the label progressive.

Ellison
“Black” as I used it is a noun. It is a synonym for “African-American.” I wasn’t aware that it was such uncommon usage. I looked it up in my dictionary, and it is listed as such there.

Ellison

Bitter and frightened -- the quintessential Democrat.

Mr. Steele
A little history. I am a black conservative (I know very rare these days). I oppose everything al, jesse, "the new black panther party" do and say. I remember hearing Mr. Steele Speak one day on the radio before the last election. I was so impressed. I thought wow..this guy has his stuff together..and not just b/c he is black (would not have known unless the radio announcer pointed it out). I hope that Fred runs and picks up Mr. Steele as his running mate. I think they would make a great ticket.

RoddRepublican - Chicago

Response
Ellison

Wow..ellison...I did not know the "dems" needed help. I thought America wanted a change and they put "dems" in power this time around....oh..that's right...the "dems" suck! Look at your poll numbers (since that is what most dems do). If the President at 30% can look down on you...you are in serious trouble.

BTW...no one that starts a sentence with "only" should try to correct anyone. Speaking of community college, maybe you should just complete that GED and shut up. Just a thought.

Vice President Steele?
What a great choice Michael Steele would be for VP. Like Lorie Byrd, I also have been a fan of his for several years, and have found him to be a most articulate (sorry about that) conservative spokesman. He could only add to a GOP ticket. Now let's resurrect Rick Santorum to run with him. I would sprint to the polls to cast my ballot for that dynamic duo, (Santorum/Steele, or Steele/Santorum).
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.