Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, December 08, 2006
Lorie Byrd :: Townhall.com Columnist
Who's in denial?
by Lorie Byrd
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Sometimes it is difficult, even as a seasoned observer, to make sense of the political world. A president leaves office with a recession, the 9/11 plot in place and having acted in such a way to inspire the phrase “doing a Lewinsky,” yet he still enjoys high approval ratings. A president who liberates 50 million people, leads the country out of a recession, enacts tax cuts that result in record economic growth and cuts the deficit in half several years earlier than he promised, constantly struggles to maintain public support. Evidently public opinion of a presidency is not all about “the economy, stupid.”

Public opinion over the past few years has depended less on the economy and more on the situation in Iraq. Even if voters were naming the economy as their number one issue though, President Bush might not be faring much better. Many public opinion polls show Americans rating the economy negatively in spite of most all economic indicators showing a booming economy. I chalk it up in large measure to the way the media have covered economic news. Every piece of good news for the Bush economy, if it even gets reported, gets passed along with warnings of doom and gloom to come, in stark contrast to the rah-rah reporting the economy received in the Clinton years.

If the tone of economic reporting has influenced public opinion, consider how much more significantly the news from Iraq and the war on terror might have. While the spin put on economic reporting has resulted in a public perception at odds with economic facts, in some cases the reporting from Iraq and the war on terror has gone far beyond spin and entered an alternate reality completely divorced from facts.

In August, Mary Katharine Ham listed dozens of reasons conservatives don’t trust the mainstream media, many of them going beyond the bias long tracked by the Media Research Center and others, to reach the level of full-fledged fabrication. Included in her list were instances of “fauxtography” -- photographs faked by computer, and then sold to Reuters and other news agencies and published in news stories all over the world. Since then, the list of such examples has grown even longer.

Recently the blog Flopping Aces exposed yet another case of faulty reporting from Iraq. Not only had the Associated Press source of the widely reported story of the burning of six mosques in Iraq and the live burnings of several individuals been the source of dozens of other AP stories over the past year, but Hussein was not who he said he was. In fact, the elusive “Captain Jamil Hussein” who turns out to not be a captain with the Iraqi police, was the source for 61 AP stories.

Bob Owens explains just how wide reaching this latest story could be. “This developing Associated Press implosion may go back as far as two years, affecting as many as 60 stories from just this one allegedly fake policeman alone. And Jamil Hussein is just one of more than a dozen potentially fake Iraqi policemen used in news reports the AP disseminates around the world. This does not begin to attempt to account for non-official sources which the AP will have an even harder time substantiating. Quite literally, almost all AP reporting from Iraq not verified from reporters of other news organizations is now suspect, and with good reason.”

What I find interesting is the reaction of many in the media to questions about their reporting. I believe Dan Rather and Mary Mapes’, “fake, but accurate” still takes the prize for most incredible reaction, but some others are running a close second. When the credibility of Captain Jamil Hussein was questioned, the reaction of AP International Editor, John Daniszewski, was to lash out at the U.S. military. “The attempt to question the existence of the known police officer who spoke to the AP is frankly ludicrous and hints at a certain level of desperation to dispute or suppress the facts of the incident in question.”

Bill Roggio, reporting from Iraq, described the reaction of many in the military to the reporting they have seen coming from there. “In nearly every conversation, the soldiers, Marines and contractors expressed they were upset with the coverage of the war in Iraq in general, and the public perception of the daily situation on the ground. They felt the media was there to sensationalize the news, and several stated some reporters were only interested in "blood and guts." … This isn't the first time I encountered this sentiment from the troops. I experienced this attitude from the Marines while I was in western Iraq last year, and the soldiers in the Canadian Army in Afghanistan also expressed frustration with the media's presentation of the war.”

While many in the media have included as part of their Iraq reporting editorial comments about President Bush’s denial of the reality there, it is many in the media who now seem to be denying reality. The bias that so many have complained of for years has now been supplemented with something even worse, stories that appear to be made up altogether. Until the Associated Press and others in the media decide to seriously address the problems being uncovered with their international reporting, their credibility will remain in question.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lorie Byrd is a Townhall.com columnist and blogs at Wizbang and at LorieByrd.com.

Be the first to read Lorie Byrd's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Not quite...
A Day In The Life of Dave Republican



Dave gets up at 6:30am and has a bottle of spring water. Even though there is no guarantee that this water is safe to drink, it is certainly safer than drinking it from the tap. Because Liberals would rather spend time pushing for federal mandates on abortion and gay marriage, no attention or funding has been provided for states to tend to the needs of local water departments. Budgets keep getting slashed under both administrations (to be fair) that undermine the ability for local governments to adequately take care of the citizens of their cities. Dave does not drink coffee because he has no need for caffeine, tobacco, or any other potentially addictive substance--- he prefers to think clearly.

He takes medication rarely, because he his cautious and responsible enough to take care of his body (sure, things happen beyond our control... granted). His medications may have to be bought overseas, should he need them, because the federal government has made it more difficult over the past 12 years or so for pharmaceutical companies to be competitive. Capitalism is being legislatively horse-whipped in favor of "fairness for all." Dave will have to pay the price for this fairness one way or another, even if he is fortunate enough not to have to take these meds.

All but $10.00 of his medications are paid for by his employers medical plan because some liberal union workers fought their employers for paid medical insurance, but now Dave takes home less of the money he earned, and has no say in who is medical care providers are, and the insurance companies continue to raise premiums because they know "insurance" will pay the bill, regardless of who is paying that insurance. If Dave were allowed to keep every dime of his paycheck, he would be able to shop around in a more competitive market for the care he needs. Dave does not fit the Liberals' image of the typical American. He is smart enough to know how to take care of himself.

David eats granola bars and fruit for breakfast. He knows he will need the carbs for energy, but does not want all the grease and salt Joe likes in his diet (but it's a free country, so Joe may load up on the trans fats if he wants to). Joe's bacon and other processed meats would be safer to eat regardless of who claims power in the house, as long as the congressmen listen to their constituents. People are more likely to tall the government what they want if they know the government will actually listen, instead of treat them like they are all kindergarteners who don't know better.

Dave takes his morning shower without reaching for shampoo. A bar of soap does the trick. Most consumers don't have enough of a chemistry background to know what the label on a shampoo bottle is really telling them (though a list of know allergens that may irritate the skin of some is a good idea). It might be better if Dave knew whether or not the collagen in some cosmetic products is still the by-product of aborted fetuses (human and animal), or if the ingredients were tested on animals first.

Dave dresses, walks outside and takes a deep breath. The air he breathes is so-so, but the town in which he lives is drying up. People are moving away because some tree hugging liberal fought for laws to stop industries from polluting the air, even though the factories were trying hard to comply with ever-changing EPA standards. Main street is now full of empty buildings because the town's economy was ruined by the loss of the factories. People had to move away to find other jobs.

Dave drives to work in a Chevy Suburban. He needs this vehicle to haul trailers, kids, and miscellaneous items for work and home. Some Liberal curses him at the gas pump and tells him that when the Democrats take back all of the government, his "gas-guzzling" SUV will be banned from the streets. Dave is aware of the need to conserve fossil fuels, and does not drive this vehicle anymore than he really needs to. The steering wheel of this SUV will have to be pried from Dave's cold, dead hands. This is still America. The terrorists in the Middle-East are far more responsible for the cost of gas than Dave is--- what are the Liberals willing to do about it? Until we are allowed to drill on our continent, the terrorists will control most of the world's oil supply. And those who complain about potential environmental hazards should know that most spills occur when transporting oil from 6000 miles away, and that Mexico has oil rigs just a few miles from North America, and has less stringent safety and environmental regulations than the United States.

Dave begins his work day; he has a good job with fair pay, medical benefits that are sub-par because he cannot shop for his own provider, retirement that is governmentally controlled and subsidized (with no guarantee that any money will be there when he retires), and paid holidays that would be unnecessary if he were able to keep more of his earnings. Dave resigned from the union because some Liberal union uses his dues to support a national political agenda with which he does not agree. He is doing just fine with no union representation, and has actually found that his employer is more likely to negotiate with him personally, because he does good work and does not hide behind union muscle to get the employer to bend to his every whim. If Dave were allowed to keep more of his earnings, he could easily take care of his own insurance, and set aside money in personal accounts and investments to take care of any unforeseen illnesses or emergencies. He might also be able to "buy" vacation days from his employer at a better rate than what the unions have negotiated for him in his contract. Consequently, Dave has decided to donate the money that was formerly deducted against his will for union dues to a charity this year. He believes the charity will make better use of the money than a Liberal union.

Its noon time, Dave needs to make a Bank Deposit so he can pay some bills. Dave's deposit is only about 72% of his total gross earnings. The federal government is taking too much of Dave's paycheck, and he finds himself funding pork projects that benefit people in congress for whom he did not vote, knowing that they would continue funding unnecessary projects that will be of no benefit to Dave or his community (all for the "common good"). Insured banking is fine, but does Dave little good because he seems to have so little to put in the bank thanks to out of control spending by both parties in Washington.

Dave does not need to pay Fannie Mae underwritten Mortgages, etc, because he knows they are a rip=off. He will go to a local bank or credit union and negotiate the best rate he can get on a loan (but would be able to pay much of it in cash if he could pocket more of his own money to invest in mutual funds or high-interest accounts). Some Liberal decided that Dave should become as dependent as possible on the federal government, and is making it harder for him to privatize accounts and negotiate his own terms in the marketplace. The cost of education and housing would decrease if consumer driven competition replaced guaranteed payment of whatever institutions want to charge (knowing that federally insured loans with outrageous interest and finance charges added in will more than make up for any losses they may experience).

Dave is home from work. He plans to visit his father this evening at his typical suburban home.
When Dave gets there, however, he sees bulldozers razing his old boyhood home. His father sits at the curb sobbing. "Eminent Domain" has claimed yet another person's private property in order to build a new country club that will increase tax revenue for the city. The Liberal mayor can be seen from his mansion window, wringing his hands in contemplation of the new project that will run the "less desirable" class from his town. He does not care that Dave's father built that house in 1932, while working three jobs to support his family. He only cares about the tax money to be had. If the Liberal mayor would have supported initiatives like the fair-tax plan, or done a better job balancing the city's budget (instead of embezzling money or pushing for his own salary to be raised every year), Dave's dad may not have had to surrender his property against his will.

Dave is doing his best to help support his dad financially, because his Social Security is barely enough to support him. His dad's business filed Chapter 11 just before he was to receive his first pension check. Now the hundreds of thousands of dollars he earned are gone because of unscrupulous business practices or because of a union that demanded too much. Dave's dad worked for an auto maker who eventually went belly up because of the outrageous benefits Liberal union members were expecting. Dave's dad would have been a millionaire by now if he had been able to keep and invest his own money, rather than relying on the government or his former employer to take care of him when he retired. Dave sadly helps dad walk to the car, and starts the long drive home.

He turns on a radio talk show, the host actually makes sense, and gives facts to support any claims he makes, good or bad. Dave knows right away that this must be a Conservative radio host. There are few instances of name-calling, no bleeped expletives, and the host has intelligent, thoughtful callers who help confirm to Dave that there are intelligent people out there still who have pride in their country, love their freedom, and are willing to give their neighbors the benefit of the doubt in knowing what is best for them (and for their families) without having to have legislation introduced to tell them what is best. Dave's dad manages to smile, and it gets them talking about the hope that people like the callers on this talk show will fight to keep America free.

Dave agrees with Joe's comment from above, "We don't need those big government Liberals ruining our lives; after all, I'm a self made man who believes everyone should take care of themselves, just like I have---" and adds, "but I wish the government would stop passing laws (or allowing judges to write them from the bench) to tell me how I can or cannot live, and I wish they would let me decide what I can or cannot do with my money. We'd be a better society if we were expected to be responsible, exercised more common sense, and were allowed to take care of our own".



Those media meanies
What would you guys do without the "liberal media?" What a fantastic tool: rallies the troops, works the refs, instantly discredits inconvenient news, and provides an all-purpose excuse any time conservatives and their causes lose. "Why, we'd win all the time, b-b-b-but, those liberal media...."
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.