Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Thursday, April 03, 2008
Lisa A. Rickard :: Townhall.com Columnist
Arbitration Ain't Broke, But Trial Lawyers Want to "Fix" It
by Lisa A. Rickard
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


 A short article appeared in The New York Times on June 13, 1925 headlined “Federal Court Cases Double in Ten Years.” From 1915, the number of cases had risen annually from nearly 63,000 to about 126,000.  Despite their best efforts, the federal courts were drowning in cases, but change was coming. Four months earlier, Congress had passed the Federal Arbitration Act.

In the ensuing eighty three years, arbitration has proven to be a quick, fair and efficient alternative to lawsuits and, as a result, it has become a preferred alternative way to seek justice for millions of Americans.

But hold on! Some are now suggesting that perhaps arbitration isn’t the success story it appears to be, and they want to take it away.

Last fall, for example, the pro-lawsuit special interest group Public Citizen released a paper purporting to show that arbitrations find against the consumer the majority of the time. Unfortunately, Public Citizen tortures the statistics to try to make their case.

For a complete analysis of how misleading the Public Citizen report is, click on the link to the report: Arbitration – A Good Deal for Consumers by Dr. Peter B. Rutledge.

Nonetheless, the plaintiffs’ bar is taking up the Public Citizen’s report as proof that consumers are being denied their right to access the courts – and thus their access to justice – because of pre-dispute arbitration requirements.

Their timing, never a coincidence, was carefully coordinated to coincide with the introduction of the Feingold/Johnson Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007, a proposal that would effectively outlaw arbitration in virtually all consumer, employment and franchise contracts, leaving the courthouse as the only option for settling disputes.

That may be good for lawyers, but not so good for consumers.  Why?

First, consumers get disputes resolved faster in arbitration than in court.  The American Arbitration Association and other groups show that arbitration takes on average anywhere from four to 10 months to resolve a case. The federal courts take two years, on average, to get a case to trial, with state court backlogs showing similar delays. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lisa A. Rickard serves as president of the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), where she provides strategic leadership to ILR's comprehensive program aimed at changing the legal culture that has resulted in our nation's litigation explosion.

Be the first to read Lisa A. Rickard’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
Not in mainstream media
Nothing about this is in mainstream media for probably the same reason so many things aren't: the media is beholden to corporate America, and in some cases outright corporate owned. Corporations love binding mandatory arbitration clauses in consumer contracts. It keeps their wrong doing out of public light! If this wasn't a procedure favorable to corporations, then corporations would not be using it industry wide for things like phones, cars, houses, medical care, credit cards, computers, software, and so on. Consumers have no realistic choice because we need these things, and everyone in the industry's got an arbitration clause. FEW consumers really understand what it is until it's too late.

I believe the Chamber's study was very skewed, and mostly showed people's ignorance of arbitration. Industry studies always conveniently show what the industry wants it to show. The study sounds as biased as their repeat business arbitrators!

What's wrong with this picture?
Here in the United States we have about 5% of the world's population and 85% of the world's lawyers.

There are two big reasons why health care costs so much. One is government involvement and the other is lawyers.

Lawyers are the only 'profession' you have to hire to protect yourself from other members of the same profession.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.