Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, October 26, 2007
Linda Chavez :: Townhall.com Columnist
Say Goodbye to Family Friendly TV
by Linda Chavez
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will Sarah Palin make a run at the GOP Nomination in 2012?


Am I imagining it or is television becoming even more family unfriendly? For years now, primetime television fare has offered a steady diet of comedies that depend on sexual innuendo and situations for laughs, crime dramas that make the world seem like it's filled with sadistic predators and perverts, often within our own homes, and cable "news" programs that spend as much time dissecting the bizarre antics of this week's celebrity bad girl (or boy) as they do covering real news.

But avoiding objectionable material has become more difficult, despite V-chips, which allow parents to control access to certain programs. And one of the more toxic areas is now the ads.

Not only do commercials try to use sex to sell everything from automobiles to soap, it seems half the ads on TV now are marketing sex itself in the form of sex-enhancing drugs. And there's no avoiding the ads, no matter how careful you are with selecting your programming.

You can block "Desperate Housewives" or "Sex in the City" reruns, but what do you do about the ads in family programs -- like Major League Baseball? I was astonished at what aired between innings of the fourth game in the National League Championship Series between the Colorado Rockies and the Arizona Diamondbacks, for example. The usual impotence drugs led the pack, as they do for most sports programming. You wonder how many kids out there turn to Dad to explain what "ED" stands for.

Then there were the liquor ads, and since the game aired on cable, these were for hard liquor, not just the usual beer commercials. No matter what messages the advertisers tack on to "drink responsibly," pushing alcohol consumption to young audiences is destructive.

But the worst offender during the NLCS was by far Levi's. Remember when the company used to sell its blue jeans with rugged cowboys outfitted in its signature 501 style denims? Now the emphasis isn't how sturdy the pants are but how quickly randy couples can get out of them. The NLCS Levi's ad featured a series of young couples, some appearing to be teenagers, ripping off their shirts as they moved toward each other to reveal yet another hot guy or gal underneath. That is until the last couple embrace, bare-torsoed and wearing only their Levi's.

And it's not just sex, drugs and alcohol that offend decency. Many of the ads are downright horrifying for adults, much less kids. Since its Halloween season, there's the usual Hollywood release of the latest slasher film ad to frighten all ages, plus the many gruesome images used to advertise network shows like "Bones," the various "CSI" and "Law and Order" incarnations, "Close to Home," or others.

The networks plug their own shows relentlessly, as do the supposedly advertising-free premium channels. And if you happen to subscribe to channels like HBO because you're a fan of some particular series (in my case, "The Wire," which may be the best drama ever produced for television), you can be watching something unobjectionable only to have soft-core porn flash on screen in the form of a promotion for another of the network's shows.

Even the program guides that list channel offerings can be a challenge. You may block offensive programs or channels, but just perusing the on-screen guide looking for something decent to watch can be a minefield. Recently, the PG animated movie "Happy Feet" aired right before "Cathouse," which the guide helpfully describes as a documentary on "the Moonlite Bunny Ranch . . . a legal brothel in Nevada." And if you're looking for entertainment after 10 p.m., you'll find listings for shows like "Real Sex," "Sin City Diaries," or the latest HBO affront, "Katie Morgan on Sex Toys."

You don't have to be a child, or even have children in your home, to find this intrusion of Hollywood values into your living room troublesome. But unless you're willing to throw out your set altogether, there doesn't seem much you can do about it.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Linda Chavez is chairman of the Center for Equal Opportunity and author of Betrayal: How Union Bosses Shake Down Their Members and Corrupt American Politics .

Be the first to read Linda Chavez's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

©Creators Syndicate
Modelling Morality
Dear SSB: There's nothing immoral about feminine beauty. Nor is there anything INHERENTLY immoral about young women modelling clothes. How they're doing it and with what message is the linchpin for consideration. This is especially true when dealing with the increasing depravity of another related endeavor... children's modelling. I further refer you to Citizen Carrier's remarks of October 27th.

A case in point
We were all -- I do mean the entire church -- gathered around the TV at a a member's home a couple of years ago watching the Super Bowl when Janet Jackson decided it would be a good time to show us all her breast. Because it was half-time and Janet Jackson (ugh!) several of the adults had wandered off to replenish snacks, leaving the TV to the kids and one of the elder women of the church. When Janet decided to do her strip-tease, Pat tried to shut the TV off, but since it wasn't her home, she didn't know how to work the remote or get past the control panel lockouts (she finally ended up unplugging it from the wall), so that by the time she disconnected the signal, everyone of our children ages 6-14 had seen Janet bare her chest.

TV has its place in American society and it would be somewhat hard to live without it. We make use of the V-chip and our kids have rules, which they seem amendable to following. And, personally, there are some shows out there that I don't want my children watching, but I don't think adults need to be sheltered from. Yeah, I'm an agist -- I think age appropriateness matters. It would be very nice if the networks would voluntarily keep their smut, including advertising, to the later hours of the evening, specific cable networks, and provide warning when a show might contain objectionable materials. I don't think that's too much to ask. Those of you who want to watch smut are welcome to do so after the kids are in bed or on networks I know to block.

How would anybody have been hurt if there'd been a warning before Janet's striptease -- this halftime presentation contains nudity? We would have turned it off and come back for the game. What is the problem with that?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.