Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Monday, March 03, 2008
Lee  Culpepper :: Townhall.com Columnist
Charter Schools: The Marine Corps of Public Education
by Lee Culpepper
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


Marines advocate decentralized command more than any other service. Its philosophy pushes important-decision making down the chain to the lowest-ranking Marines in the trenches. Such responsibility forces Marines to be incredibly knowledgeable and competent. Marines stress accountability not only for personal actions and decisions, but also for subordinates’.

Charters operate similarly, as they function independently from district schools. Charters simply have a more efficient approach. They streamline administration and eliminate bureaucratic red tape. They place greater responsibility directly on teachers. In fact, if charter-school teachers are ineffective, they cannot hide behind tenure, which protects district teachers. Charter teachers have one-year contracts. Staying employed motivates them to teach and produce results. Conversely, once tenured, district teachers have little internal pressure to perform -- as teacher-union jihad ensues if principals dare attempt firing incompetent teachers.

Furthermore, teacher unions insist  “certified teachers” are essential to learning. But charter school results prove differently, as does pragmatic research. For example, three professors -- representing Harvard, Columbia, and Dartmouth -- expose the insignificance of teacher certification in “Photo Finish.”  Unfortunately, most competent teachers who want to teach in public schools cannot escape the politically correct indoctrination and state-supported extortion of credentialing programs. Then again, charter schools can save some from the legalized shakedowns that teacher-certification programs are.

Opponents also accuse charters of draining funds from district schools. This is simply untrue. District schools receive money only for enrolled students. In other words, when families opt for charter schools, they actually give traditional schools what teacher unions demand: smaller classes and reduced teacher workload.

Finally, regarding racial diversity, no practical evidence exists that racial diversity improves learning. In fact, research by Harvard’s Ronald G. Fryer suggests the opposite. In “Acting White,” Fryer reveals that black students who do well academically in racially integrated schools face banishment and even violence from other blacks. He writes, “It’s less of a problem in the private sector and in predominantly black public schools.” He also states, “[his] findings with respect to Hispanics are even more discouraging.” Furthermore, most minority parents want the right to choose their children’s schools. But politicians who boast about looking out for minorities are the same representatives denying minorities that right.

While no one will ever mistake charter schools for the Marine Corps, charters’ ability to “accomplish more with less” deserves greater recognition. Traditional schools should try replicating the philosophy instead of plaguing charters with failed practices. The Marine Corps made the ability to improvise, to adapt, and to overcome famous. If teachers will strive for that ability, their students stand to profit.

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | < Previous
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lee Culpepper is a former Marine and high school English teacher. He is currently working to complete his first book, Alone and Unafraid: One Marine’s Counterattack Inside the Walls of Public Education. Visit Lee’s website at www.leeculpepper.com.

Be the first to read Lee Culpepper’s column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
Sign up today
To formerlyknownasHomeschoolMom:
You raise valid concerns. I would be willing to bet you, though, that if the NEA-500lbs gorilla and other union monkeys were all euthanized today, public schools would improve tomorrow. Union meddling is a primary cancer ailing public schools.

I would also wager that euthanizing "teacher colleges" would also improve schools immediately. Teacher certification is another real cancer -- along with tenure. Of course, both stem from union ideology.

The fact that a former colleague’s husband -- a surgeon -- would not be considered “a certified teacher” this very moment illustrates the idiocy of public schools. The man can perform surgery and educate fellow doctors, but he’s not qualified to teach a bunch of teenagers biology or chemistry until he forks out serious cash to be indoctrinated in politically correct BS.

Pardon me, I'm throwing up.

All right, I'm back. Maybe unions simply don't want "their teachers" to have to compete with men like Dr. Cutler who would like to teach when they retire from another career.

Simple are good plans. Start with some no-brainer solutions and improvise and adapt as necessary.

Give parents options, and give principals the power to hire and fire as they see fit. Success depends on leadership. Incompetent principals, like incompetent teachers, would not last.

I say, "Let the competition begin."

Respectfully,
Lee


Wary of unintended consequences 2 of 2
6. Which of the many standardized test available will be required, and who will decide? What will be the minimum test score standard required of the students? What will happen if the standards are not met?

7. What entity will monitor the schools and their performances? Will it be a government agency? A private agency? How much will it cost in tax dollars to fund monitoring? Exactly how will they monitor schools?

8. What implications will requirements and monitoring in the private institution sector have in the most private form of education-homeschooling?

9. Can anyone actually prove increased regulation and monitoring directly affect academic performance for the better? If not, why do it?

10. If more people have more funds available to them, will the tuition of private institutions most in demand increase? If private institutions financially invest in facilities, staff, and programs anticipating increased demand, will the government have the upper hand and ultimately control by determining who receives funds?
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.