Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Larry Kudlow :: Townhall.com Columnist
Sarah Palin, Our Energy Answer
by Larry Kudlow
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Was the Copenhagen Global Warming Summit Walk-Out a Win for the U.S.?


The number-one economic issue this election is gasoline prices at the pump. The tax-hike effect of surging oil on global markets that has translated to a huge spike at your local gas station has drained the economy of its vitality. It has damaged consumer purchasing power, made it tougher to pay mortgages on time, worsened the credit crunch, raised the inflation rate, undermined corporate profits, and thrown stocks into the first bear market in five years.

Of course, with all the political hoopla from the Denver Democrats, it’s easy to forget the populist revolt against high gas prices at the pump. Sen. Obama never mentioned skyrocketing pump prices or their devastating economic impact on ordinary working-class folks. But this is the energy election. It will determine our future peace and prosperity. And Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has the energy answer: Our abundant country can produce more energy at lower cost if government gets out of the way.

Coming from the natural-resource rich state of Alaska, Palin is an experienced energy expert. She knows more about the economics of energy than senators McCain, Obama, or Biden. And in this year of the oil-shock economy, Palin’s role will be absolutely crucial.

"Obama is way off-base on all that. I think those politicians who don’t understand that we need more domestic supply of energy flowing into our hungry markets [are] living in la-la land. And we’re in a world of hurt if they’re agenda continues to be to lock up these safe, secure, domestic supplies of energy."

That’s what Palin told me in a CNBC interview in late June. I call it drill, drill, drill. But in fact it’s a full-throated America-first energy policy that will create millions of high-paying jobs with complete government deregulation and decontrol of the full menu of energy sources: oil, natural gas, nuclear, clean coal, shale, and the alternative fuels of wind, solar, and cellulosic.

Why aren’t all the candidates talking like Palin? How can this great country put its future growth and prosperity in the hands of enemies like Tsar Vladimir Putin, Ahmadinejad, and Hugo Chavez. Well, get ready for Sarah America to take on the fight against all comers.

The plain-talking governor is even tough on John McCain. The senator has said it’s too pristine to drill in ANWR. But Palin told me in June that "Sen. McCain is wrong on that issue. . . . We’re talking about a sliver of the coastal plain of Alaska being explored and drilled for oil. It’s about a footprint of a 2,000-acre plot of land. That’s smaller than the footprint of LAX."

Palin was pleased that McCain came around on the Outer Continental Shelf. But she intended to talk him into ANWR. Expect Mr. McCain to listen carefully. And she made this key point: The price of fuel will fall quickly in the expectation of more energy supplies, just as soon as Washington permits.

And when I interviewed her again in late July, she was justifiably furious that Congress was going on summer recess without a vote on rolling back its drilling moratorium. "Well," she said, "with all due respect to Congress, it’s pretty pathetic." Meanwhile, she was taking action: Palin had just gotten the Alaska legislature to agree to a new natural-gas pipeline that was 30 years in the works.

The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that there are nearly 100 billion barrels of oil in the Arctic, with roughly one-third under sovereign U.S. territory in Alaska. There are at least 10 billion (and perhaps close to 20 billion) barrels of oil in ANWR, while old estimates suggest between 800 billion and 2 trillion barrels of oil in the Rocky Mountain shale formations.

It’s also worth noting that 1.8 billion acres of the Outer Continental Shelf -- with roughly 100 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 400 trillion feet of natural gas -- are off-limits because of the congressional moratorium.

Palin grasps the strategic importance of all these domestic reserves. She’s also a governor who fully understands the energy- and foreign-policy designs of Mr. Putin, who sits right across the pond from her native Alaska.

Meanwhile, Obama railed against drilling in his Denver convention speech. He is opposed to ANWR. And shale. And nuclear power. He’s constantly bashing oil companies. And all he talks about is a windfall profits tax. That’s why he has no real economic recovery plan. He has no interest in reducing gasoline prices at the pump. He even sponsored legislation to prevent 3-D seismic technology and other research efforts to correctly measure our undersea oil deposits.

In other words, he just doesn’t get it.

That’s why the pro-life, tax-cutting, drill, drill, drill, family-centered, corruption reformer Sarah Palin will be a powerful weapon in this election. Don’t tell me she won’t make a difference this November.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC's Kudlow & Company

Be the first to read Lawrence Kudlow's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Beyond the pale
It's absolutely preposterous that we continue to pay billions of dollars to enemy states when we have the energy literally lying beneath our feet - and all because of a cowardly Congress who kowtows to PC and environmentalist lunatics.

Absolute sheer insanity.

McCain/Palin '08

Palin / McCain WILL DRILL< DRILL

300 million citizens need ENERGY::: ENERGY:

heat, lights, gas to get to work:

since Obama has been in the Senate our food and energy prices have doubled:

HE makes us burn our food in our gas tanks;
He wants to ration our heat, lights, food, gas, transportation
USE A BIKE to haul your 4 kids around he says:
Inflate your tires:
TURN OFF YOUR HEAT, LIGHTS, eat less he says:

McCain / Palin know that 300 million citizens need heat, light, gas, food:

FEED THE CORN TO THE COWS to get dairy products
FEED the corn to the chickens to get eggs:
USE corn to make bread etc.

Obama says we have to burn more food in our gas tanks:

I've been looking for the next Maggie
Thatcher, and I think that in Sarah Palin, we have found her!

I honestly believe that men generally make better national leaders, but that on rare occasions there are women who are such great leaders, they deserve to serve at the top.

Unlike the Democrat(ick) ladies, who try to ride into the White House on the coattails of their husbands, the American Maggie Thatcher would serve in politics wearing her own coat! Hilary Clinton is the first to never serve in public office until she made a name for herself as first lady, and I believe that Michele Obama has the same stealth ambitions.

But Sarah Palin, like Maggie Thatcher, got into politics under her own power, and started at the local level, gradually working her way up the food chain.

Like Maggie Thatcher, Governor Palin seems aware that she is a woman in a man's rhelm, instead of trying to deconstruct and reconstruct our entire society to make way for her ambitions. Like Maggie Thatcher, Sarah is a man's woman, who seems to admire men and the things they do, unlike the feminazis who hate men and want to emasculate the men of America.

Sarah is a real woman of the West, and it is no wonder that the Lefties are so livid at Mrs. Palin's nomination.

B2slim -- Don't Go So Easy on McCain
When it comes to Ethanol, both Obama and McCain have been more-or-less in agreement. My research shows he's only recently "flip-flopped" on that issue.

Of course, he "flipped" from the *wrong* position to one that's more correct. But keep a watchful eye -- he may well "flop" right back again.

The energy hoax
It is a fact that Alaskan oil can be brought online in 2 years or less. In 5 years off shore will start its impact. The dims and T Boonedoggle talk about the US usage of 26% but what they don't tell you is the 74% is going to keep doing business as usual eating up our money and dirtying our air. Do you get it? You can't clean the air. The US can't clean the air. Stop being useful idiots. Use our resources to cut the money to our enemies and open up all other energy alternatives as they become viable economically. Dump corn ethanol and the detriment on our food prices. Palin is the answer and the future. Vote in senators and reps to help her. Vote out dims and rinos.

ANDREW, ARE YOU DRUNK?
That was four identical posts. I have double posted once or twice by mistake, but FOUR!!

Hey dimmy dipwit
Your off the subject and in over your head. What don't you head to the basement and light up another toke?

Family Values
My top priority is family values and i want these facts to be known. That is why i reposted these.

Sorry
Sorry, but i am a devote christian that does not believe in drug use. This is why i want to spread the word of her drug use and her husband's alcohol abuse. My top priority is family values.

Andr-u-u-w
What's that smell? Are you smoking pot again?

No, Mom!

Have you found a job yet?

You know God's bolts hit in CA, too.
I would be careful mocking.

John and Cindy
I also recently learned that John Macain met Cindy Macain in a bar while he was still married to his ex-wife. This type of behavior disturbs me greatly.

100% Republican
I am a 100% christian that has always voted republican. I desperately want to vote for Macain but because of these low family values that he embraces in Palin i cannot vote for him. I there for will vote for Ron Paul or write him in if he is not on the ballet in any form.

By the way i do not smoke pot or drink. These are sins.

If anybody is paying attention
to the typical Oblabite, Android, and his mentality with these childish posts then you know why we must defeat them massively. I mean 20 point spreads over the ACORN felons and dead people votes and all the La Raza illegal votes to show them where they belong. In Canada.

indyconantidim
I am a god fearing man. If he chooses to strike me down that is his wish. Please pray for Palin's granddaughter/son that was conceived in sin.

Wow, 100% Republican
That last one must have hit close to home. Not a peep.

What's your denomination?
Andrew?

Ron Paul
Please join me in voting for Ron Paul. He is prolife, procapitalism and has better judgment than choosing a VP with low family values like Palin.

indyconantidim
I feel sorry for you if you do not have good family values. I for one question a woman with a 17 year old pregnant daughter that is unwed.

Lutheran
Lutheran

Andrew, the subject is energy
What is Ron Paul's position on that?

Tell me, Andrew,
Do you know about the theology of Rev. Wright and Oblaba? Is that OK with you?

indyconantidim
No it is not OK with me. That is why i am voting for the only true republican, ron paul

The enerfgy hoax
It is a fact that Alaskan oil can be brought online in 2 years or less. In 5 years off shore will start its impact. The dims and T Boonedoggle talk about the US usage of 26% but what they don't tell you is the 74% is going to keep doing business as usual eating up our money and dirtying our air. Do you get it? You can't clean the air. The US can't clean the air. Stop being useful idiots. Use our resources to cut the money to our enemies and open up all other energy alternatives as they become viable economically. Dump corn ethanol and the detriment on our food prices. Palin is the answer and the future. Vote in senators and reps to help her. Vote out dims and rinos.

Energy Hoax?
Both parties and Ron Paul, wherever he may be, have failed our great nation in refusing to address our energy problems for over 30 years. With gasoline at $4/gal, they still refuse to address the issue. Their only concern is their reelection and special interest legislation.

Even if we drill, drill and develop the shale oil which could make us totally energy independent for 250 years, as soon as we eliminate our demand for imported oil, the world oil price will drop to below our costs of producing domestic oil. Saudi oil was once produced at a cost of about $1/bbl. Even if Russian oil costs $10/bbl, it would be much cheaper than $95/bbl shale oil. When the world oil supply becomes excessive, the price will decline to the point that our greed for cheap imported oil will destroy the economic production of our domestic supplies.

Do we have the political will to protect the domestic industry from cheap foreign oil? I doubt it. Our historical god of Ronald Reagan with supposed "oil man" George Bush at his side presided over the last melt down of the oil industry in 1982-1985. That short sighted policy of hands off destroyed the oil industry which destroyed the real estate market of Texas and surrounding states which destroyed the savings & loan industry which destroyed the banking industry that cost the Feds (that’s us) hundreds of billions of dollars to correct.

Palin might have the knowledge and the guts to lead us out of the wilderness. I am certain none of the other people running for executive branch offices have a clue. I also know I will never vote for an incumbent in either party until the congress begins to address the issues of our nation rather than their personal agendas.

America doesn't own the oil
How can drilling help America if it gives land to international oil companies to drill and sell the oil they find?

When they find oil, they will sell it to the highest bidder on commodity markets deregulated in 2000.

So if China and India need it to fuel their cars and are willing to pay $200 a barrel for oil, America will pay $200 a barrel for oil.

So all you globalization devotees chew on that---you can give American land to international oil companies to drill, but when they find oil they will sell it to the highest bidder. Oil companies are not charities and will not donate oil to America to drive down gas prices. They will gladly let oil producing countries control prices through outdated financial market practices, then adjust their output to maximize shareholder profits.

gas prices
You could reduce the price by eliminating all the taxes, and replacing them with ONE proper tax to collect all revenue for each level of government..

Eliminate the 18.4 (soon 28.4) cents per gallon federal pump tax, and the 32 cents per gallon, PA State pump tax. Eliminate all the other taxes (plus Obama’s intended “excess profits” tax) in existence, on all levels of government, which add up to one-third (1/3) of the price – of everything.

You could greatly reduce the price by writing a law which declares that ALL OFFSHORE OIL BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and hiring the oil companies to drill, pump, refine, and deliver all petroleum products to us for the cost of processing plus 10 cents per gallon profit.

This would eliminate the foreign nations’ price per barrel, the speculators’ add-on charge, the oil-tanker-ship charge, the oil spills when the tanker ships run aground, and the clean-up cost thereof. This would reduce the price for refined petroleum to well under a dollar a gallon, and make us independent of the Arabs and all other oil-selling peoples.

Energy Policy and Corruption
It would be very helpful to see publication of a serious study of the relationships, if any, between the politicians who oppose development of America's domestic energy resources and the foreign government beneficiaries of our non-existent energy policies. Our energy policies are too stupid to be sustained by anything other than by political corruption.

J Howard & Ron from PA
J Howard - I'm not a Texan but (like you say) I wish I were. Straight talking and level headed thinking is what I like the most about Texans. You nailed it.

Ron from PA - You presented a very interesting proposal and got me thinking. I'd be curious to get the oil industry take on your idea. It could just be the sort of political middle ground that could span the Dems desire to socialize the oil industry (among others) and the conservative view of free markets. Thanks for the thought.

Apparently Uninformed voter:
The government owns the land in question, and they do not GIVE the oil but lease (sell) the rights to companies that extract, refine and market it. Besides that, they tax the hell out of the finished product that is sold on the market.
The 200 dollar figure you come up with is a fantasy. With the increased supply, the price will fall--for everyone.
But the main thing is that the US will have control of all that oil, and we will not be beholden to the OPEC cartel that artificially keeps prices high by curtailing the amount of oil they put on the market.

Palin should talk to McCain
He's the candidate, and he's the one that does not support drilling in Anwar - the easiest most accessible and cheapest to drill source of oil we have.

Economic ignorance
It is an absolute shame that the typical American is absolutely clueless about economics.

This is never made clearer than when you hear people talk about the price of oil and what drives it. Everything is conspiracy theories as opposed to basic supply and demand, rational behavior, and expectations. It's no wonder the politicians can so easily play us off against each other.

PV
It's not just economic ignorance, it's the tragically uninformed such as the writer with the handle "Informed Voter." The even greater tragedy is that those who represent “Informed Voter” in our congress are equally mystified by the huge energy problem we face. We probably will not develop our domestic oil resources until the foreign supply of oil is denied us, or becomes prohibitively expensive. That day will come and all the windmills and solar panels provided by today's tax give-a-ways will demonstrate the idiocy of our current congress and administration.

a little history
It is amazing how the evil of those who sell us oil was completely irrelevant to conservatives when the subject was auto fuel efficiency. I thought I read that Palin imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaskan oil production. Wouldn't that make her a Marxist like the Democrats?

Personal Attacks
Despite the personal attacks by honorable posters they have not offered any evidence to dispute the point. The oil drilled by oil companies does not belong to the US Government or its citizens---we are a capitalist country. Experts who have studied the impact oil drilling will have on the current price (a US government Energy Commission) and have concluded it is negligible.(the market impact) So unless you subscribe to laughable supply-demand theories by obscure college professors (mostly left wing) you are off base. Policy and politics are serious business and idealogical cheerleading is un-patriotic, shallow, and ineffective in the face of a serious national challenge. Both Democrats and Republicans are paying $4 a gallon for gas, it is not an issue that needs politization to solve.

So America is a capitalist country and if you advocate taxing oil companies out of existence by exhorbinant oil leases or royalties, you are missing what makes business work---profits. The idea of massive government intervention in the oil markets is contrary to free market principals.

The Palin Choice
McCain's choice of Palin proves him incompetent and reckless. McCain had only met with Palin one time before he chose her to be his running mate. His staff had not vetted her. And yet he chose her to be a 72-76 year old heartbeat away from the presidency of the United States of America. McCain's poor judgement mirrors that of Bush's. Palin (and all republicans), continue to give big oil ownership of America, your wallet, and eventually your mortgage. Not to mention the fact that conservative republicans despise the Constitution of the United States, (not that Americans really care about small details like that - their main concern is being able to afford milk right now.)

Palin's energy economics 101
Governor Palin is correct: "The price of fuel will fall quickly in the expectation of more energy supplies, just as soon as Washington permits." Open additional off-shore prospects to exploration. Put ANWR in the mix. Stop the downward slide in domestic production.

Democrats have a defeatist attitude: Don't open new areas to exploration 'cause it will take too long to get the oil to market. Don't bother drilling for new supplies 'cause it won't have an immediate affect on gasoline prices. Don't exploit new prospects 'cause it won't make a significant difference in the global oil supply/demand balance. Just keep increasing our dependency on foreign oil, that's what. Just move further into the loving arms of Hugo Chavez, that's what.

Gosh, I'm glad the vast majority of American voters have more sense than that!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.