Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Friday, May 02, 2008
Larry Kudlow :: Townhall.com Columnist
Bush's "R" Is For "Right"
by Larry Kudlow
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Will the Dems' health care Christmas Present to America be an improvement or detriment to our health care system?


President George W. Bush may turn out to be the top economic forecaster in the country.

About a month ago he told reporters, “We’re not in a recession, we’re in a slowdown.” At a White House news conference a few weeks later, despite the fact that reporters pressed him to use the “R” word, Mr. Bush refused. And on Friday, after the most recent jobs report -- which produced a much-smaller-than-expected decline in corporate payrolls, a huge 362,000 increase in the more entrepreneurial household survey (the best gain in five months), and a historically low 5 percent unemployment rate (4.95 percent, to be precise) -- the president told reporters: “This economy is going to come on. I’m confident it will.”

We’re in the midst of the most widely predicted and heralded recession in history. Problem is, so far it’s a non-recession recession. Score one for President Bush. In an election year, it could be a big one.

First-quarter GDP growth came in at 0.6 percent. It wasn’t the widely predicted decline, and economists expect that number to be revised up. GDP growth for the fourth quarter of 2007 was also up slightly, while the prior two quarters averaged over 4 percent growth.

My pal Jimmy Pethokoukis quotes Stanford professor Robert Hall, who heads the recession-dating committee at the National Bureau of Economic Research: “It seems unlikely that we would ever declare a peak-date when real GDP continued to rise.”

Interesting -- isn’t it? -- just how durable and resilient our low-tax, free-market, capitalist economy truly is. Hit by soaring food and energy prices, a bad housing downturn, and a Wall Street credit crunch, the economy continues to expand, albeit slowly.

The bad news bears always focus on areas of economic weakness. But parts of the economy are doing splendidly. This includes agriculture, energy, export firms operating in the global boom, and all manner of private-sector business, professional, health, and education services. Incidentally, these are the exact sectors producing the highest-paying jobs. What’s more, at 154 million employed, the civilian labor force just hit a new all-time high.

Another significant data point: Corporate profits are outperforming all expectations. With three quarters of the S&P 500 companies reporting, profits outside the banking system have increased 10 percent over a year ago.

Profits are a dirty word on the campaign trail. Hillary and Obama, who blame American corporations for most every problem under the sun, want to tax profits heavily. With ExxonMobil and other oil companies reporting strong earnings, Democrats are now calling for a windfall profits tax. Last time we tried that -- under Jimmy Carter -- foreign energy imports rose 8 to 16 percent and domestic energy production fell 3 to 6 percent. (This according top a study by the Congressional Research Service.)

A Senate Republican group led by Pete Domenici has a much better idea: Expand drilling and production both offshore and in Alaska. Domenici’s group estimates this would produce up to 24 billion barrels of oil, enough to cover five years of U.S. energy use without a single import.

It’s a vastly better plan than penalizing American businesses and their profits, which are the mother’s milk of stocks, jobs, and the economy. Senator John McCain gets this. His plan to slash the corporate tax rate is the single-best proposal on the campaign trail. McCain also understands that you don’t raise taxes during a slowdown. Nor do you raise taxes when the economy is bouncing back.

Right now, optimism seems to be returning to the stock market. None other than the New York Times ran a front-page story stating, “Wall Street Sees Signs of Sunshine.” That’s like the Daily Worker announcing the end of socialism. But let’s credit the old Gray Lady with reading the tea leaves right.

As a result of mighty efforts by the Federal Reserve, the credit crunch is easing and bond-market risk spreads are falling. The stock market just finished its best April since 2003, with the Dow running above 13,000. The Fed has come to the end of its rate-cutting cycle, and the U.S. greenback is starting to gain strength. With the dollar turning stronger, gold and other inflation signals are coming down.

Even tax rebates for working people will help a bit, although I’m no fan of temporary tax cuts. The much better idea is to make President Bush’s investment tax cuts permanent. McCain is for it. Hill-Bama is against it.

Whose call is it going to be?

Recessions and slowdowns come and go in the free-market economy. But even so, it looks like President Bush -- against all odds -- may have the last laugh. If he’s right on his no-recession prediction, Sen. McCain and Republicans down the electoral ladder are likely to benefit.

Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author

Lawrence Kudlow is host of CNBC's Kudlow & Company

Be the first to read Lawrence Kudlow's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.

Bush's "R" Is For "Right"
Sam wrote, "Technology (which I am a part of) and manufacturing are leaving this country are being redistributed towards India and China."

Did you know that China has cut many more manufacturing jobs than we have? Globally, about 13% of manufacturing jobs have been lost. China too.

Automation is the main reason; not cheap wages in foreign countries. Outsourcing accounts for only a small fraction of the loss of manufacturing jobs.

Bush's "R" Is For "Right"
Mr. Kudlow coined that phrase and I say it fits perfectly.

Dr. John Lott (Univ of Maryland) published an op-ed just about a week ago evaluating the MSM coverage of the economy. He compared media coverage under GWB and Clinton. The disparity was huge. GWB has been given much, much more negative coverage even though GDP fell in 3 of 5 quarters in 1998-99 while under GWB it hasn't fallen even once. The agenda of the MSM is all too obvious to the educated.

concession by anti intelligent design
although i don not belieee in the introduction of intelligen design into the science classrom, i will, after consultation with my gods (six out of seven of them anyway. there always has to be one who is contray) to accept and even fight for the right of those who consider intelligen design as a possible counter to evolution, ti introduce it in every science classrom. this would be done with appropriate gyuarantees on the part of the staff and the adnministration of the school to moffer it to the student with as unbiased a presentation as possible.
youm, on the other hand must allow me to presen the absolute incontravertable evidence i have for the cause of this intervention as being 3 out of 7 of the gods i believe in. they have spent many years convincing me that they are the gods respomsible for creating the world and most everything in it (they wont trake credit foe the thousands of creation causing imposters). they have definite proof (both objective and subjective) listen to them and you will have a hard time disbelieving. they have even had a movie med about their work (unfortunately it was a flop at the box office, unless you include all goats, sheep, mice etc who attended as part of th attendance.
this way you get a chance to establish yours, and ill get a chance to present mine. as for the 3000 or so other ideas around the world who have some crazy notion that their belief about interlligne design and the intelligen designer... to hell with them.,. literally. we can handle this explosive problem bu compromise. i should mention that all of my gods are former vaudeville performers and their presentation are accompanied by extensive sklits, dances and comedic routines from thos days. i hope yiou dont think this gives us an unfair advantage... waiting to hear from you

mcclain will solve our budget problems
fiscal conservatives, run for the hills. someone has done an analysis od mccain proposed budget changes. you should remember that the campaign hasnt even started yet. hes got a long way to go taxes to cut busy busy busy, money to spend busy busy busy1. extend bushs tax cuts 228 billion annulayyy

2. proposed tax cuts slash corporate tax rate 2a eliminate alternative minimun tax
2b. double exemption for dependent children 2c. cost 225 billion annually

3. proposed business tax break credit for 1st year expenditure for equipment estimated ocst 140 billion annually

4. proposed new motrgage refinancing program cost about 5 billion

5. suspend gasoline tax for the summer cost 9 billion

6.proposed new student loan program cost Unknown

7.propose tax writ off for companies that provide internet service to rurawl areaas cost unknown

how to pay for above. spending cuts (please see above)

2. close corporate tax loopholes (please see every campaign promise made by every politicain for the past 80 to 100 years)

3.kill congrwessional earmarks dont know how much

4.freeze on spending increases. he was very enthusiastic about this until someonme asked him what programs he aould cut. very sarcastic reply.

in total not sure and impossible to compute until he get much more specific but estimated that it will come in about 3.00 less then obamas budget proposed changes and about 7.00 less than clintons propsed budget . this will enable republicans to truthfully use the same old canard about tax and spend liberals that they have used for many years. however they have ad=vised mccain to be very careful in what he proposes from now on because they dont want to lose that slogan.

anyone for a fiscal conservative. if you find one please let me know,

natural superiority of white american ma
i wonder how much easier the rest of the world, including those in the USA would have if they truly understood and acepted one simple fact. "i am a white american male. i am superior to you by 10 or 15 percent in anything you choose to measure. i will not give up this advantage under any circumstances until you come and pry it out of my cold dead hands.

price of oil
ive just gone through all that is on this page and noticed a lot of what is being written deals with the price of gas, and oil. almost everyone who discusses this, somewhere finalyy gets arouns to "world establised prices" and "midle Eastt suppling oli" and especially saudi arabia. i understand that they should take these thing inot account. what i dont understand is what none of them say anything about Canada. Canada supplies us with more oil than any other single country (including Saudi Arabia_. Canda has proved reserves as large or larger than any other country in the world. add the oil locked inot the oil shale (which according to the latest pronuncements from the oil industry is now recoverable at a profit giiven the rising price of oil. given that reserve and add it to proven reserve there is NO PART OF THE WORLD NOT JUST NO COUNTRY THAT CAN COMPETE WITH cANADA AS A SUPPLIER OF OIL. would it make any difference to those who are so concerned about the oprice of oil if, when they discussed it, they realized that that the major supplier, was not a sheik in lon flowing gown whose sons are raising hell with oil money living it up in Paris or London or las Vegas, o=r the d supplier was a p man with w corporate business suit, smoking a cigar, white, talking with a slight french (Montreal Cnadian) accent. to read what they write you would think that as far as oil and gas are concerned Canada did not exist.

price of oil
ive just gone through all that is on this page and noticed a lot of what is being written deals with the price of gas, and oil. almost everyone who discusses this, somewhere finalyy gets arouns to "world establised prices" and "midle Eastt suppling oli" and especially saudi arabia. i understand that they should take these thing inot account. what i dont understand is what none of them say anything about Canada. Canada supplies us with more oil than any other single country (including Saudi Arabia_. Canda has proved reserves as large or larger than any other country in the world. add the oil locked inot the oil shale (which according to the latest pronuncements from the oil industry is now recoverable at a profit giiven the rising price of oil. given that reserve and add it to proven reserve there is NO PART OF THE WORLD NOT JUST NO COUNTRY THAT CAN COMPETE WITH cANADA AS A SUPPLIER OF OIL. would it make any difference to those who are so concerned about the oprice of oil if, when they discussed it, they realized that that the major supplier, was not a sheik in lon flowing gown whose sons are raising hell with oil money living it up in Paris or London or las Vegas, o=r the d supplier was a p man with w corporate business suit, smoking a cigar, white, talking with a slight french (Montreal Cnadian) accent. to read what they write you would think that as far as oil and gas are concerned Canada did not exist.

to ken
thank you so much for making me aware o the defects in my understanding. you use the word global. please what does that mean.
? i am dyine to learn i notice you didnt go into too much detail about what in hell you were talking about. are you sure you know?

to ken
thank you so much for making me aware o the defects in my understanding. you use the word global. please what does that mean.
? i am dyine to learn i notice you didnt go into too much detail about what in hell you were talking about. are you sure you know?

to finlay
yea ther are a couple left they call them congressmen and senators. and there are at least a couple more of them then the other guys

to mrbmrb
CONSERVATIVES PLEASE TAKE CARE
i am a died in the wool liberal...

You lost me after that.....

It's too bad, because you have so much passion and so little understanding of the reality of global enterprise. Compasion and diversity doesn't pay the bills.

Thanx for exposing (overexposing) the true liberal mindset.



CONSERVATIVES PLEASE TAKE CARE
i am a died in the wool liberal... please try to kepp from fainting and continue. we , especially our candidates have been accues of fosterig every evikl plan and machination possible, AS SOCIALISTS, by you people. if we pee more that twice a day we are acused of some plot to make sure women in burkas replace the marine guard at th Whit House when we enter in January.
B ecareful what you say. words have meaning. we will win in november. before all thie suss atarted about some rev or other, almost evry objective observer said the 10 democrats will certainly win the senate, and have a 2/3 veto proof majority. 2/ although a little less certain it is very likely that democrats will win the house although not quit with a 2/3 majority, but almost certainly a large majoority 3/ unless god interferes democtrats will almost certainly win the presidency riding in on the coattails of a speedily departing Bush, whom thwy will certainly choose as the reublican candidate for president. again, this is who they will run against anyway, by the time november rolls around mccain wil have disappeared, relpace by bush standing on th deck of an aircraaft carrier talking nonsense. nothing in politics is for certain . but this seemed to be to concensus, even among right wingers who appeared to be talkng candidly. so STOP USING THE LANGUAGE YOU ARE USING AGAINST US. IF YOU ARE WISE. I AMA LIBERAL, AND KNOW MANY LIBERALS, HAVE READ INFO FROM MANY LKI=LIBERALS, AND DO NOT KNOW ONE SOCIALIST AMONGST THEM. NOW IT IS YOUR RIGHT TO CALL US WHATEVER YOU WISH, I CANONLY ADVISE. STOP IT. GTHERER IS A THEORY IN SOCIOLOGY THAT ESSENTIALLY SAYS, CALL A PERSON SOMETHING OFTEN ENOUGH, DO IT WITH ENOUGH PEOPLE, CALL HIM IT ON SITUATION AFTER SITUATION, AND THERE IS A STRONG TENDENCY FOR HUMAN BEING TO BEHAVE AS IF WHAT YOU CALLED HIM WERE TRUE. YOU YOIURSELF, BY THE INDISCRIMINATE UES OF VITUPEROUS LANGUAGE WILL CREATE THE MONSTER YOU SO WISH TO AVOID. AND THEN WE'LL GET CHA

to broadlest corporate tax rate
you might want to check your figures in other sources just to see what happens. Mother Earth is about as unbiased to the left and you kipplingers is to theright. mayby you ought to take an average
if wi owned stock in a corporartion and at the annual meeting the auditors announced that we had paid a tax rate of 40 per cent, there would be loud peals of laughter from the other stockholders, then a monpment of silence as we learned that he really meant if, the lastly, the screms fo the aufditors and his staff as we drewand quarterdedm them for their incompetance. and he would deserve it. the figur is noinsense, in fact it is so far away from reality that conservatives who want to complain about the high reat of corporate taxes wwont even use that figure or one close to it to begin lying about how muh they do pay.
these companies that you suggest would move their operations to foreign countries to avoid paying our taxes. they must be foreign corporation who have taxable operations here in th united dtates,, surely no american corporation would do a thing like that. after all they made their money by being in a country that favored conditions to allow them to make it. tioeave under those conditions woiuld br or should be tantamount to treason.. they are affording aid and comfort to our enemies , rel and potential, by deliberatly damaing our economy. perhaps we should start thinking ofmit in those terms. it might make them think twice about what damage they are doing to the country that gave them birth and nurtured them for so long/ go with my blessing

to broadlest corporate tax rate
you might want to check your figures in other sources just to see what happens. Mother Earth is about as unbiased to the left and you kipplingers is to theright. mayby you ought to take an average
if wi owned stock in a corporartion and at the annual meeting the auditors announced that we had paid a tax rate of 40 per cent, there would be loud peals of laughter from the other stockholders, then a monpment of silence as we learned that he really meant if, the lastly, the screms fo the aufditors and his staff as we drewand quarterdedm them for their incompetance. and he would deserve it. the figur is noinsense, in fact it is so far away from reality that conservatives who want to complain about the high reat of corporate taxes wwont even use that figure or one close to it to begin lying about how muh they do pay.
these companies that you suggest would move their operations to foreign countries to avoid paying our taxes. they must be foreign corporation who have taxable operations here in th united dtates,, surely no american corporation would do a thing like that. after all they made their money by being in a country that favored conditions to allow them to make it. tioeave under those conditions woiuld br or should be tantamount to treason.. they are affording aid and comfort to our enemies , rel and potential, by deliberatly damaing our economy. perhaps we should start thinking ofmit in those terms. it might make them think twice about what damage they are doing to the country that gave them birth and nurtured them for so long/ go with my blessing

limiate the media
title says it all. reading all the bull---- i have ben reading since i started reading stuff like the above, i have truly learned some things about our system.
if we are ver to have fair reporting, unbiasesd and clear, foxfair and ubnbiased, etc etc etc, the only way to accomplish this is to do away immeiately with all the media. this will insure that all of theabove happen, surely a worthwhile goal. it will also cut down the number of letters written to explain ether parties defects and problems. letter writers wont have the media to kick around any more. i mean all media even thi o

limiate the media
title says it all. reading all the bull---- i have ben reading since i started reading stuff like the above, i have truly learned some things about our system.
if we are ver to have fair reporting, unbiasesd and clear, foxfair and ubnbiased, etc etc etc, the only way to accomplish this is to do away immeiately with all the media. this will insure that all of theabove happen, surely a worthwhile goal. it will also cut down the number of letters written to explain ether parties defects and problems. letter writers wont have the media to kick around any more. i mean all media even thi o

corporate tax rate
funny just yesterday old newt gingrich was on one of the talk sj=hows and admitted that the tax rate for corporations was really about13 to 14 per cent. leiberals have been saying this for years, consevs say 40 percent in fuigures compiled by survey taken by one of the most non partisan non conservative, non prejudiced, definitly middle of the road, publications, ever. look it up, its just below.pld newt of course als o hasnt a biased boe iin his body. anybody out there who understands newt admission, and his partial conversion tio climate change. har to talk about rest homes and treatment centers but if i were the dems i would watch nim. just when you think you ve got the snake turnuing one way he ia sly and cunnimg enought o whip around and bite you on th ankle

Corporate Taxes (Part 2)
Now compare corporate income tax rates and put yourself in the position of managers who are tasked with the job of increasing after-tax income for their real bosses ... the shareholders (that is, you and I) ... or be replaced. Keeping in mind that it's not your business, but the shareholders ... wouldn't you find ways of moving lucrative portions of your businesses overseas -- especially exporting, services, manufacturing and assembly work? Wouldn't you raise transfer prices (prices charged between a company's subsidiaries or sister companies) to highest possible level, in order to move taxable income out of the United States?
Top Corporate Income Tax Rates (%)
1996–2002 (national plus state or provincial taxes)
United States 40%
Canada 38.6%
Germany 38.4%
Mexico 35%
Netherlands 34.5%
France 34.3%
Average for 30 OECD countries 31.4%
Luxembourg 30.4%
UK and Australia 30%
Switzerland 24.0%
Iceland 8%
Ireland 16%
Source: KPMG, “Corporate Tax Rate Survey

Corporate Taxes
Why are jobs, economic growth and taxable income are flowing out of the United States? Well, I've worked in international finance for decades now and have seen many intercompany agreements (agreements between companies and their, often foreign, subsidiaries) implemented that effectively move jobs and even more taxable income out of the United States. Why is this happening?
1. Lower-cost, highly-educated and highly-skilled workers elsewhere
2. Modern infrastructure to support newer technologies elsewhere
3. Significantly lower corporate income tax rates on businesses elsewhere
We can do little in the immediate-term to stem the tide related to the first and second points, although we can improve education, encourage employee profit-sharing to reduce to the prevalence of old-world labor union activity, thus improving productivity.
Having been to second- and third-world countries like India and Mexico and seen new promise in a sea of poverty and I say more power to them ... let the rising economic tides lift their boats as well (improvements in the environment and labor safety will follow as the masses are able to turn their attention from having enough to feed their families to other issues).
Certainly, we must continue to improve our infrastructure such as roads, the power grid, alternative energy sources and related technologies, but these too will take some planning and investment.
However, we can make a major positive change for our economy in a New York minute, if the public demanded it ... drastically reduce or eliminate corporate income taxes. It seems counter-intuitive ... a paradox, but our economy and our tax revenues would jump dramatically and steadily as personal incomes, savings and both corporate and personal investment and spending rise.
Just Google "Ireland's Economic Boom" sometime ...

3 wire and christain baiting
i would delight in baiting christians. trouble is in 73 years i havent found one. any suggestions?

Bush get an R
This is the first time in years that the media called for a recession and nobody came.....

atheist
ill add a little math to that...100million people voted last election...people who claim they are republican probably vote because to claim a party probably means you do. so...68% of 50 million...well thats about 38million...which is about 13% of the country's population. where did the other 17% come from? means there are more people that are not republicans approving of bush than of republicans approving. very interesting don't ya think?

i would also like you to explain the survey where people think the economy is doing bad, but they personally were doing good overall.

oil company profits.
they had good reason yo expect congree to buy hthios outlandish proposal becaued they have had a buddy buddy realtionshoip with congree and camo[paign finance lwas for many years. lets just say it is not unusual for the oil companuies to get what they want from congeree Keep your eye on the campaign fund bubble.
but this time they went too far. congree to toil companie chagin , and even to their own grabbed an area right about where the groin starts and sid NO. this is even more than i can tell the people about.
to make a long story short. they both pulled out a very privat part of their biody, waved it at each other to see wjos was biggest, and they are still waving. neither will give in. oil company because theirs is bigge, congree because for once in their life know they wouldlook like idiots if they did it. so there you are. make sanse? im not any where near an economist. i never even try to balance my check book because i hate the intensde dissapointed feeling i used to get when i tried. this does make sense to me, which shoukld sound alarm bells to anyone el=se who may feel the same way. so let me know whereim wrong. but be sure to answer the question "why no new refineys when it makes sense for them to build them. why send oil back across the border to Canada to be refinned, because our are running at capacity

oil prices.
tio supplanment the above... ii shiould smphasize that i have been told this is true but i have no proof other than the word of a person who was in a position to know.
about 45 years ago oil comditions were essentially the same as the are now. high demane, less supply, huigh prices etc. oil companies came to pres and congree. told them, we can refine much more oil if we build more refineries, bu tht e only way we build them is if you agree to give us tax credite equal to the cost of building the refineries. this wouldmdeaan that they would get the refineries for nothing. they had ever rason to do what seems at first glance tobe

oil company profits
number 7 as a choice is classical economic theory working. it is what according to all the theories is supposed to happen.
8. or they can lower or keep relatively constat the supply. since demand is not going to go down, this will mean less oil available in the world, and , guess what? higher proces and higheer profits. so if they pick this choic they can produce less of their product then they have and still maintain record prices and profits. this is of course because they are working together (Illegal under US law) fixing quotas and prices. it makes absolute snnse for them to do this. the one major advantage to no 8,. is that it almost guarantees them a staedy or increasing profit, but under this the life of the supply is extended and they can make the profit longer. thereris plenty of proof for this but the nmajor proof is the lack of new re
fineries. it makes absolutely no sense unless 8 is right cause for nationalization. iof course

oil company profits
number 7 as a choice is classical economic theory working. it is what according to all the theories is supposed to happen.
8. or they can lower or keep relatively constat the supply. since demand is not going to go down, this will mean less oil available in the world, and , guess what? higher proces and higheer profits. so if they pick this choic they can produce less of their product then they have and still maintain record prices and profits. this is of course because they are working together (Illegal under US law) fixing quotas and prices. it makes absolute snnse for them to do this. the one major advantage to no 8,. is that it almost guarantees them a staedy or increasing profit, but under this the life of the supply is extended and they can make the profit longer. thereris plenty of proof for this but the nmajor proof is the lack of new re
fineries. it makes absolutely no sense unless 8 is right cause for nationalization. iof course

oil company profitss
5, refinery space is so limited in the usa that even though we import more oil from Canada then from any other country )including Saudi Arabia) we are sending 1000s iof gallons back across the border for refining, and then back to us as refined product.
6. there is nothing to indicate that demand will lower at any time in ther near or evn far f7. oil companies can choose between two alternnatives. . the can increase to supplym, increase the amount of refined product, and since the damnd and the price are already so high, they would stand to,make more money. greater the demand greater the price. greater the price greater the supply next frasme

oil company profits.
Follow the bouncing ball kiddies: theme" the united states must nationalize the oil industry as soon as possible. the major reason for this is expaline dbelow
1. oil capacity is finite. no matter whse figures you use ther is an end to it.
2. demand for oil is at an all time high and every economic indicator we have seems to show that this dincrease in demand will continu
3. the price of oil, like almost evreything is controlled by, mainly, the laws of supply and d2.
4. oil company profits are at anm all time high or at least near it and have been there for about 40 years.0next frame if youre interested

ron writes
then who would subsidize the loan you used to get through college. the imortgage payment on your house. the army. navy etc. about 40 percent of the scientific research that don for drugs in the USA. TVA and the electricity is supplies to so many people. disablilyminsurance for people who because of no fault of their own find that they are paralyzed. what a silly idea that s

Rush Ratings
I doubt that there are any higher ratings than Rush's anywhere...of course he gets his in the FREE market, where people listen because they so choose...are there any Liberal hosts that can make it in the free market?

Uh huh!
"McCain also understands that you don’t raise taxes during a slowdown. Nor do you raise taxes when the economy is bouncing back."

That's funny, because McCain admitted himself that he doesn't understand the economy. All of a sudden he's an expert I suppose.

Larry,Stay on TV
Larry pretends he's still an economist. Q1 growth showed declines in durables and nondurables which doesn't bode well since these components are the basis for consumer spending. Inventory growth was negligible but services and exports drove the indicator higher.
"In other words the only thing that saved the Economy from going into the tank badly in Q1 was a weak dollar along with gov't spending." Gov't spending,the engine of the last 8 years as GwB has presided over the largest growth ever in government spending and in government employment. GwB exceeds even LBJ with his wealth transfers and the war.

carter vs bush
its getting pretty pathetic when the only thing that the conservatives can do to rescure geroe w bush from his horible favoribility ratings, is find someonme who they believe is worse than him and compare them/ what they are saying is that bush cant be so bad no matter how many people disapprove of him because there is at least one other president in our history who we believe is worse. granted if we didnt have carter to kick arounf then we would be in trouble, but as long as weve got that benchmark the worse that bush casn be is the seconf worse president in histriy. terrific. thats like saying the bullet wound in myy head is really that bad even though it will probalbly kill me because there is a bullet wound in my chect that im sure will kill me. always try to look on the bright side.

John Konop:
Glad to hear you're not an Olbermann fan; maybe
you would consider not promoting his ignorant
leftist garbage.

I agree Bush is no real conservative, but scum
like KO offer nothing constructive in the way of
intelligent criticism. His microscopic ratings
reflect that fact.

tax increases under bush
i dont know much about economics so if i write something wron below i hops somone will let me knthe basic idea is that all other tihing sbeing equal. increases in the National debt are really just disguised increased taxed. the national debt has risen about 65 trillion doll;are under Bush. this is how much he has caused taxed to rise.
year one national budgetr 100.00
year one actual wexpenditures 100.00
annual deficit zero
taxes necessry to pay budget 100.00

year two national budget 100.00
tear two actual expenditures 110.00
year two annual deficit 10.00
year two national debt 10.00
taxes (if there is no increase) 100.00

year three national byudget 100.00
year three actual expenditure 110.00
year three annuakl deficit 10.00
national deby 20.00
national debt 20.00
taxes necessary to pay for annual budet and National deby 120.00
\ how is this not a tax increase.?

Economy
Those who take responsibility for themselves know that "The Economy" has nothing to do with their own personal economy...those who depend on "The Economy" or the Government for their well-being will always be wanting...the economy is what one makes it, personal choices etc.

The Truth

Bullgod

I am not a big fan but his show is growing. The reason he is growing is because the GOP is sticking with a sinking ship! The truth is Bush is not conservative and he has ruined the movement for years. Until the GOP deals with the truth it will keep going down hill!

Atheist Provocateur
Praying for you. I'm really sorry that you feel you have to hate someone to disagree with them. Where did you learn that?

A math exercise
Ok, here's a little distraction.

70 percent of Americans disapprove of Bush. However, 68 percent of Republicans approve of Bush.

If there are 380 million Americans, of which 70 percent disapprove of Bush, 68 percent of Republicans approve of Bush then how many Republicans are there in this country?

Bonus points for figuring out what percentage of the total Republican population weekly listens to Rush Limbaugh and are "ditto heads".


hUgs AnD KiSseS
Oh, you guys are so cute. Thanks for the warm thoughts. MMMm smooch.

Hey, you are guys are so smart, let me ask you all question.

If the economy is going so well and the Iraq war too, then why does Bush have the highest disapproval rating in history? Even higher than Carter and Truman? Wow, the public disapproves of Bush more than Carter. Tsk tsk tsk. The only question now is just how low can Bush get, will he break his own records?

I'm just kinda curious as to what world you all live in. Is it space monkeys? Are there space monkeys driving the public crazy?

Is it the devil himself...the MSM? Have they mesmerized the American public into BDS?

Please, oh generous, wonderful ones, enlighten us as to why we disapprove of Bush if its not the economy or the Iraq war.

Oh, and thanks again for the special thoughts.

P.W. Bonus points if you can explain how the 70 percent disapproval rating held by Americans of Bush without saying Americans are voting against their own best interests the way Obama accused them of being "bitter". Obama says, "Guns, god and religion", you all say "MSM". It gets a little old. Bonus points for something novel. Like space monkeys.

John Konop:
Is it fair?

Well, no; it's Keith Olbermann! Spewing his usual
liberal tripe.

The best thing about KO and MSNBC is that
nobody's taken in by their propaganda - because
nobody's watching!

Mike
You've got that one right. I live in Arizona and 55mph is practically standing still. And getting shot is a real possibility, road rage is very high here. You made me laugh.

It amazes me how the libs love to see
the negative. I didn't live in the US during Clinton's years, but did they complain and whine as much as they do now. We are not in a recession with a positive GNP. It may be small, but maybe you should be grateful instead of so angry and vengeful. A recession is what happened in Carter's years. Punish the oil companies for profits get gas lines 14-24% interest rates etc. If you haven't lived during Of course lets blame Bush for high gas prices well if that's the case you might as well blame the Clinton's too. What did his Presidency do to keep prices low by alternative forms of energy. NOTHING

Olbermann Rips Apart Bush Economy Speech

Radical
The next president is going to inherit the same kind of economy that Jimmuh inherited for mostly the same reasons. Bush inherited a terrific economy in large part because Clinton ran 3 straight years of balanced budgets and was paying off the national debt (the Treasury not only stopped issuing 30-year treasuries but was buying them back). The economy was pretty good at the end of LBJ's "Great Society" boondoggle too. Bush is coasting to the end by printing money and bailing out all of the problems. This is only beginning. All 3 of the presidential candidates are advocating more of the same (yes, McCain too - look at his big gov health care plan). If you think this economy is strong, you just aren't paying attention. The pain index is high and climbing fast. If it weren't for the tens of millions of government jobs the Bush crowd created and the cheap labor brought in illegally, there would have been a very large net loss in employment. This has been liberal big government of the highest order and we are headed for more of it. Get ready for stagflation again.

Dear Radical
Most of us conservatives know this administration is not conservative. But there are very few real conservatives left because it's so much easier to feel than think. Liberal Republicans are no different in that respect. None of them are thinkers and they'd rather be liked than stand up for any sort of conservative principles. I agree that "W" is no conservative on fiscal and some social issues. But he's what we have until we get another liberal Republican in the WH. Then we can start trashing him, too. But talking down the economy won't help. Windfall taxes on corporations (whose profit MARGINS are still only about 8-10%) won't help, either. What happens when they pick up their marbles and move away like many businesses in California did when they tried that stupid experiment in government control of money.

I agree with Realist. Most folks don't know a bad economy. Look around your house, people. You think you're poor? HA!

Anyone
...who believes this is a bad economy hasn't lived long enough to know the difference. Anyone who thinks "W" is the worst President in history needs to get a memory transplant. You don't have to go very far back to find Carter's high inflation, high unemployment, and high interest rates. Not to mention Wilson, LBJ, and -- yes, the Democrat Icon -- FDR if you want to really pick a few scabs. But of course I waste my time: never try to teach a pig to dance.

Economy
I want to start by saying I voted for G.W.twice.Is this guy Larry on crack? When G.W. took office gas was $1.40 a gallon. The numbers he sites are government generated buy the same bunch that keeps telling us that we can fix BAD DEBT [The sub prime mess} WITH MORE DEBT {HOLY VOODOO ECONOMICS}.When he took office we had the safest food {tainted fish} and prescription drug {heprin} supply in the world we no longer do.He has overseen the largest exodus of manufacturing in history.We have become financially indebted to the likes of comminuist China.The dollar is in the craper and all the boot licking republicans can't see this stuff through there partisan rose colored glasses.You can never fix a problem if you don't recognize it.THIS IS NOT A CONSERVITIVE ADMINISTRATION !!!!!And calling it that won't make it true.If we are going to fix this we have to stop accepting the garbage the party offers and making excuses by saying it's better than the alternative. Signed The Radical

loco
What world do you live in? If we were to drill in Alaska, we WOULD be paying global prices. Why would anyone cough up the kind of capital required for such a project to chase inferior returns? And oil is a fungible commodity. We may not even be the one who accepts shipment of that oil. Users don't shop for oil geographically, they buy futures contracts which get traded. If ANWAR oil was put on the market based on your terms, there is no telling who it would be benefiting. Probably China which is the closest port because it is cheaper to ship oil than pipe. You have to come up with real-world solutions. Richard Branson of Virgin Airlines thought he had the solution to expensive fuel too when he declared he would be refining his own oil. What ever happened to that? Reality set in.

naysayers
please be sure to come back here in 3 months and bring something to drink-- crow is hard to swallow.

This is the best economy we've had for consecutive quarters of growth,

Of course if you were too stupid to buy oil and gold- or even any commodities up to 2 years ago- well sorry but your boat has sailed.

Don't blame others if you couldn't save your video game money, your flat screen, your 4X4 etc.
to invest a few dollars.

One thousand dollars would be worth 42,000 today.

Golly - but I'd have had to take a risk !!

ughhh-losers

Ron
I'm all for what you suggest but the price of gas will not go down as a result. The price of gas is where it is because you are willing to pay that price.

There seems to be
some serious optical rectalitus in this country that is spreading like a cancer.

Even a cursory look at the Carter years with a minor side by side comparison to George Bush years will tell you who is the worst president. Bush's numbers even dust Clinton's.

Get over yourselves.

Fascinating
When Clinton had 3 months of Economic DECLINE, all the libs said, "Quit talking down the Economy!"

Now I'm no Mathemitician, but isn't 3 greater than 2?

Bush has had Zero months of economic decline, and all the libs say Recession.

Again, I'm not a Mathemitician, but isn't 0 less than 2?

just my thoughts.

jd

Wow, the weirdos are out early!
Agree with you, Mike P! The rudeness really annoys me, too. My grandmother always used to tell me that if I had to resort to name calling, my vocabulary wasn't big enough!

You can talk an economy up - remember the tech rise in the 90's fueled by little more than optimism? And you can talk an economy down - we're slower but we're not down and out. I live in an area that is very rural, and always off the radar, but we're surviving and in fact, building has increased, employment is at an all time high and those that are in need are being taken care of by their community, not the government. Of course, as more Californians move here, that will change!

We talk about big corporations - we need to start talking about big government. That's our money they're throwing around. They need to go on monetary diet, just like I did when I retired. Funny how you can get by when you have to!

oil prices
Eliminate the 18.4 cents per gallon federal pump tax, and the 32 cents per gallon, PA State pump tax. Eliminate all the other taxes in existence, on all levels of government, which add up to one-third (1/3) of the price – of everything.

You could greatly reduce the price by writing a law which declares that ALL OFFSHORE OIL BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and hiring the oil companies to drill, pump, refine, and deliver all petroleum products to us for the cost of processing plus 10 cents per gallon profit.

This would eliminate the foreign nations’ price per barrel, the speculators’ add-on charge, the oil-tanker-ship charge, the oil spills when the tanker ships run aground, and the clean-up cost thereof. This would reduce the price for refined petroleum to well under a dollar a gallon, and make us independent of the Arabs and all other oil-selling peoples.

You could also reduce the price by no longer wasting our oil and wasting our food supply by diluting our gasoline with alcohol and making it inefficient. Gasoline provides energy by exploding in the engine, while alcohol burns and does not explode, providing no energy.

All of this would also end the budget deficit, put the balance-of-payments in our favor, and enable our paying off the national debt. What would increasing taxes on the oil companies do for us? Nothing good would come of it, only higher taxes, shortages, and more dependence, which is just what you liberals want most.

Tax reform
We the people pay all taxes, and we are the sole ultimate source of all tax revenue. Regardless where government initially collects the money, all tax money ultimately comes from us, the people, even though business has to pay thousands or millions of dollars at one time, and get it back from us one dollar at a time.
Since we the people are the one and only source of all tax revenue:
There should be only one tax to collect all tax revenue.
It should be a single, simple, fair, direct, graduated, individual, full-income tax levied on living persons for each level of government: One Tax and Done.
The best thing that government can do to help the country, the people, and even government, is to repeal all of the many hundreds, or thousands of existing taxes, fees, and charges. These taxes are the federal deficit. These taxes are the high price of everything. These tax eliminations are spending cuts. Every tax that is eliminated is a tax that we the people no longer have to pay. These taxes are the difference between the price we pay for health care and everything else, and the price we would pay if these taxes were repealed. Eliminating these taxes will remove them from the price paid for everything by everyone, including government.
One Tax and Done will provide many benefits to all, even government:
One Tax and Done will stop reductions in tax revenue because people reduced their use of water, sewage, and other governmental services.
One Tax and Done will reduce the price paid for everything by one-third.

As for real estate empires
Some economies that amass concentrated wealth on real estate empires: Mexico comes to mind. I hear Putin and Castro are also real estate billionaires. The problem with real estate empires is that they don't contribute much to a societies COMMONwealth.

How wrong can you be Kudlow?
Bush's economic plan is based on cheap illegal labor, gigantic expansion of government jobs and printing new money to pay for it. In the short run, everyone seems rich because we are in the spending phase of running out of borrowed money and living beyond their means. We are going to pay for it big-time once hyper-inflation kicks in. We need to go back to rewarding innovation (and not the kind of cleptocratic innovation that has looted our banks and Wall Street conglomerates). We once fought a civil war to end a cheap labor economy. Why do we have to back track and relearn THAT historical lesson? Let's go back to being innovative economic world leaders. The Larry Kudlows may not like it because real estate empires don't benefit so much from technological innovation as from cheap labor, but the greatness of this country was not built on Kudlow-like real estate empires.

Redflac
If we drill in Anwar and off shore, we will not be paying the world price. We would be paying our price as well as encouraging the middle east to lower their price.

Mike Pitzler
Mike Pitzler writes: Saturday, May, 03, 2008 8:05 AM
55 mph
My friend Bob suggested we drive at 55 mph, create an oil glut, and drive prices back down. Would that work?


No it will not work. We are using less oil than we used last year. yet oil is still going UP in price. Around the world places like China and India are using more oil which is driving the demand up and hence the price. What we need is drilling in ANWR

Optimistic
Larry's an optimistic sort who pops up occassionally when conditions, having declined, stabilize over the short term or even tick up a little. Recently, he bragged about the Fed's intervention in the mortgage crisis - precisely because he had one of those loans that were going to come due on his million dollar plus house, and the Fed's action saved him several thousand a month. Of course, he didn't care that someone had to pay for his benefit - or that he didn't need it, only that he got it. The dollar, which had steadily weakened, then began weakening further as the low interest rate began to undermine it. He never commented on that either. Rather, he waited until it stabilized, at least temporarily. Now he says it is strengthening. Of course, the more practical reality is that it is still worth less than it was before the Fed dropped interest rates. And, he doesn't point out that this policy, in combination with Federal spending, is the reason that oil prices are so high.

Europeons paid 60 euros per barrel in 2003 when the dollar was trading at $1 per Euro, and today, at $118 per barrel, they are paying 75 Euros. Americans, on the other hand, were paying $60 per barrel in 03, and are now paying $118 per barrel. All because that same Euro is now worth $1.55. So, they convert to dollars and buy oil. Our oil prices have essentially doubled, and theirs, and much of the rest of the world, have increased by only 20%. And Larry, being Larry, doesn't like to dwell on these things - so looks at the short term.

I certainly support adding Anwar, but those that think it will make much difference in the price of gas at the pump need to keep in mind that oil prices are set internationally, and that Anwar isn't a large enough field to have much effect on the world's consumption - meaning, it won't have much effect on what we pay for oil. After all, the oil industry charges the same price whether they take it out of Alaska or the Middle East.

Scream out!
Now is the time in the midst of this oil problem to scream out and force our timid politicians (mostly Democrats and McCain) to go against the special interests groups (environmentalists) and do the right thing like drilling in Anwar and off shore, building refineries and nuclear plants.

Force them with your voices and emails to stop promising the public alternative fuels are just around the corner.

Bush's R is for "'Right".
To My Pet Goat, I can't imagine how miserable your life must be!

Amazing...
How we can even be in trouble with so many brilliant economists in this country...or do they all post only on TH? You guys know it all. MikeB, Vindex, Sam, Boutte, My Pet Goat (what's up with that?), Atheist Provocateur, Anna, Kimberly, JamesB, TeeHall showed us their brilliance here today...:) Your display of intelligence and knowledge only reinforces the need for some kind of voter IQ and basic knowledge test. There would never be another liberal president in this country.
BTW did you see what happened in England? Labour and the idiot Brown got massacred in local elections and the commie Ken Livingstone lost to the first conservative mayor of London in 30 years.

The media tells the sheep what to bleat.
The public hears about the economy from whom? The media. What does the media actually understand about economics. Not much.

So--they ask the sheeple of the U.S. what they think about the economy and they say, "Baaaaad!" Then they ask how the sheeple feel about their own sheepfold and they say, "Good!"

Well, there you are!

Of course all the liberal idiots will
come on here and deny the obvious. They will push the big lie in the face of evidence. He idiot liberals, the big lie doesn't work on the internet, it only works with the MSM. Go peddle your lies somewhere else.

Larry, Listen Up
Whatever you want to call it, that's okay with me. The Bushes and Kudlow are members of the Council on Foreign Relations and that means go with commerce irrespective of what happens along the way. Down with borders and sovereignty - and bring in the illegals. McCain is a member. So nothing changes if McShame is elected. If one of the others is elected, we replace the red in our flag with pink. Lastly, Kudlow - if McCain is elected, he gets no benefits of whatever you said - he inherits the woes of Bush, 31 years of trade deficit (as in "free" trade which you love) and above all, he will have the opportunity to work with a Demo Congress, to which he can reach across the aisle over and over. McCain and Kennedy, Feingold, Lindsey Graham - aka Little Jerk, Pelosi ---- all pals of McCain.

55 mph
My friend Bob suggested we drive at 55 mph, create an oil glut, and drive prices back down. Would that work? I've been trying that out here in Arizona, but I think I'll get shot soon if more don't join in. A compromise plan is to drive behind the slowest vehicle on the freeway. It's somewhat safer.

By the way, why are there so many rude comments? Do you guys talk to you mother's like that? I hope not. Easy does it.

One of the reasons oil prices
are high can be blamed on the dems and their "green" friends. Back when carter was prez, we had those long lines and alternate days etc, once oil hit a buck a gallon we were awash in the stuff,that was on the oil companies. But all we got from the peanut was wear a sweater and turn down the thermostat, real leadership there. We should have begun building nuclear plants and new refinaries then and we wouldn't be in this mess now. The environuts will sue to block a plant, lose and re-file the same suit worded differently and block it again ad infinitum. We need a prez who authorizes new plants by executive order and damn the consequences.

We have oil up the wazoo in ANWR and the gulf and coal for another 200 years, I'm sure the caribou won't mind if we do a little pumping, it might chase the mosquitos away...that's all that's up there.

Bush grade: Domestic, C-, Foreign, F.
Stockmarket has been doing pretty well recently.

Lots of Americans have some investments in the market.

But I sense alot of angst out there in the heartland.

Costs for almost everything are going up and up. Gasoline, food, health care, just to name a few.

Value of the dollar has plummeted, making crude oil much more expensive.

Rate of growth of the economy under this administration has been poor, compared with most administrations.

I don't see what Kudlow is crowing about.

I agree with the Senate Republican group, including Pete Domenici, about drilling in anwr and along our coasts.

The Dems have alot of bad ideas on energy.

But G.W. Bush will forever be tied to Iraq.

And his legacy will always be in tatters on account of that fact alone.


Atheist Provocauteur
What, did you go to church or something? Oh, I bet you are sacrificing a goat by taking its virginity. Come out of the woodwork, and answer my request.

Atheist
want to hear another survey?

most people think the economy is worse as you stated...but when surveyed about their personal financial situation they were by and large better off...so it seems that #2 on your list proves true lol

check my blog
for an update on what our roots would think about today! lets hear the insight from the founding fathers.

hyperinflation?
boy you guys are lost out there aren't ya...i don't agree so much with this, but hyperinflation? do you even know how to spell economics let alone what it means?


this recession has been much better than expected because the liberal media had drummed it up to make GW look even worse. Well, lets see if it backfires or not. We will have a small recession and am at the front side of it right now I think, but I do not think it will be as bad as the liberal media portrays. Heck if we drilled in ANWR we would lower gas prices to less than half what it is...being I spend a couple thousand per year on gas...thats like a tax break and they only have to use our resources, which are renewable anyways. (yes oil is, how did it get there? renewable)

I know saying drilling in ANWR is like telling someone that using both hands for everyday use is better than one, but they just don't seem to get it do they?

Atheist Provocateur
Hey Hotshot, I thought you only baited Christians. Now you are preaching communist drivel about the "recession." FYI, Mr. Genius, a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. Which, of course hasn't happened yet. So, notwithstanding your wish that the country go to hell, it hasn't and it will not.
On another subject, I see you are real good at trashing Christians and their beliefs, so I have a few web sites that I wish you would visit and post your drivel, you know your atheist beliefs, and taunts against believers:
http://www.cair.com/http:/;
http//english.aljazeera.net/; and
http://www.islamonline.net/english/index.shtml
Be sure in your rantings against "true believers" to give them your home address.
Christians will pray for you. These guys will prey upon you. So go coward, show us your true colors. Or are you only capable of attacking those that will not respond in kind?
I thought so.

gdp
Does any American here realize that in five years one fifth of our entire economy is going to be health care costs. Help the USA, get sick now!

Nice
I love it when Republicans call up down and black white.

Hey Larry, you forgot to add that we've already won the war in Iraq!

Americans disapprove of the way the economy is being handled by a whopping 60 percent or better.

Which means Larry asks us to believe one of two things.

1.) People can't count the money in their wallets.

2.) The mainstream media has worked a terrible dark spell on the public to get them to believe the economy is whacked.

Ho ho ho! Keep saying uP! is Down! you wacky Republicans. Obama is sure to get elected.

You people and your wacky MSM conspiracy theories, just as delicious and 9/11 conspiracy theorists.

The economy and Iraq war will both insure a Democrat gets elected. Add some arrogant denial by the likes of Larry and the Democrats are assured another 50 year run controlling Congress.



Mr. Goat...

You just repeated the line many of my inlaws live by, "this has been the single worst President in our entire history."

Of course this group of inlaws have some things in common: All have cheated on their spouses, got divorced, got re-married, and cheated on their new spouses. They drink too much, their kids are a mess, and the words "adult children of alcoholics" is an understatement.

In simple terms... Idiots usually come to the same conclusion.

So, can we assume you need therapy?

My hope and prayer...
...is that W lives a very long life after he leaves office.

I want him to see his failed Administration thrown onto the dung heap of history. I want him to see the rest of the world and all of history agree that this has been the single worst President in our entire history.

Free Market Economics RULES!!!
I really don't understand some of the wacko comments that Larry always attracts.
If there is a more astute observer of the economy, please post him, but no one has been more right in the past 5 years concerning GDP Growth, Stock Market performance, Corporate Profits, the Housing Market, etc.
I am a huge fan of Larry Kudlow because he not only knows his stuff, but is a FIERCE advocate of Free Market Economics AND Supply Side Economics!

Larry Rocks!

No Enforcement/No Votes


We the People of the United States of America have the right to have our borders and our laws respected and enforced.

Citizens of other countries illegally in our country have no right to demand anything from our government. They most certainly have the right to petition the governments of their home countries for change if they are unhappy with their home country. If they want to be Americans, we have a path to citizenship, more generous than any other nation, and it starts in their home country.

We need to insist on the equal protection, application and enforcement of the law or devolve into anarchy. Our Republic only functions if everyone follows the same rules. We should not change the laws to accomodate those breaking them.

If America annouces to the world "We can't stop you, so come on in" with another amnesty, the deluge will be overwhelming. If 3,000 a day didn't get your attention, then wait until it's 10,000 a day. We cannot sustain this influx and survive as a nation. We must speak up and speak to each other about this and not let false claims of racism or bigotry be used to intimidate us into silent assent. America is not Congress' to give away. America belongs to We the People. Speak to your neighbors, speak to your coworkers, but please speak up to your Congressmen and Senators. It's O.K. for us to enforce our laws, no really, it is.

Someone please tell Sen. McCain.

Never
let the criminals investigate their own crimes.

And if you do, and are actually surprised when they find themselves 'not guilty' then you are an idiot.

And you get an R for
Ret.... Never mind, If you think a 0.6% growth rate was a real reflection of the market maybe you are an R.
Considering how businesses hold out profits over years, it will take at least 6 months before we know what really went on this quarter.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.